tv State of the Union CNN May 20, 2012 9:00am-10:00am PDT
job. and then you walked over to this thing, it is totally original. this is why i'm here. >> turns out howard actually knows the difference between broadcast television and cursing his way through his sirius xm show. hey now. that's it for this edition of reliable sources. join us again next sunday morning, 11 a.m. eastern, for another critical look at the media. "state of the union" with candy crowley begins right now. character, capitalism, and controversy. just another week on the campaign trail. today who will define mitt romney? >> romney made sure the guys on top got to play by a separate set of rules. he ran up massive debts, and the middle class lost. >> the centerpiece of his campaign is quite clearly character assassination. >> exclusive interviews with obama senior advisor david
axelrod and republican national committee chairman reince priebus. also spending cuts, tax cuts, and what do women want in 2012 with senators barbara boxer and kay bailey hutchison. plus, an exclusive interview with nato secretary-general anders fogh rasmussen on the exit of afghanistan. and chewing over the week with jeff zeleny of "the new york times" and cnn congressional correspondent dana bash. i'm candy crowley, and this is "state of the union." while vice president biden questioned mitt romney's business credentials on the stump, the obama re-elect team pumped out a small buy ad with a big bite attacking bain capital, the equity firm romney founded. >> they made as much money off it as they could, and they closed it down, they filed for bankruptcy without any concern for the families or the communities. >> like a vampire. they came in and sucked the life out of us. >> within hours, camp romney was up with a web ad of its own and a story of its own. >> sti almost never got started.
when others shied away, mitt romney private sector leadership team stepped in. >> building a a dream with over 6,000 employees today. >> if it wasn't for a company like steel dynamic, this county wouldn't have a lot. >> joining me to discuss this week's tale of two steel mills and other campaign adventures, obama campaign senior adviser david axelrod. david, thanks for joining us from beautiful downtown chicago. we appreciate it. >> beautiful indeed. >> yes, it is pretty. i wanted to start out with something that mitt romney said, characterizing what your advertising is about. >> the purpose of the president's ads are not to describe success and failure, but to somehow to suggest that i'm not a good person or not a good guy. >> and do you quibble with that? is not the gist of the ad that is not the gist of the ad that you-all put out about bain capital, romney's former firm, that he is a rich, greedy guy who doesn't care about the
middle class? >> no, i do quibble with that. the point of the ad is to look at his business record. the only credential that governor romney has offered the people of this country for running for the presidency is that he was a businessman. he never talks about the fact that he was governor of massachusetts because when he was governor of massachusetts, they went from 36 to 47th in job creation, and it was a pretty much of a disastrous period. so that he doesn't talk about. he talks about being a businessman and hints that somehow the things he did there prepare him to lead the country and its economy, and so it behooves us to look at what exactly he did. and the fact is that he wasn't about job creation, and he and his partners have acknowledged in candid moments, our job wasn't to create jobs, it was to create wealth for ourselves and our partners. and they did it by any means necessary. >> well, it was to find -- he has had success stories, you will agree to that, but i mean what they are saying is, look,
this was a private equity firm, an investment firm. we invested in businesses. we wanted them to succeed. some of them did, and some of them didn't. doesn't that tell you this is a guy with a business background who understands -- >> some of them -- >> -- what makes businesses tick. >> some of them did and some of them didn't, candy, but he always walked away with money, and that was the point. the point was that he didn't -- they didn't fail with the company. they didn't embrace the failure. they loaded that company, gst steel, with debt, and then they bankrupted the company. moved -- the company was in kansas city. they filed for bankruptcy in north carolina so they could vacate some of their obligations to their workers. so the workers lost health care benefits and some additional benefits that they were -- that they had negotiated for that they were promised, and governor romney's team walked away with at least $12 million. that is not -- that is what vice president biden was referring to. it is not right when you have two sets of rules where the guys at the top prosper no matter what happens and the workers down the line bear the brunt of
it. that's the kind of dislocations we've had in our economy. it's what concerns people about what we're been. >> i want to move you on, since you mentioned vice president biden, to something that he talked about in youngstown, ohio. >> my mother and father believed that if my brother or sister wanted to be a millionaire, they could be a millionaire. my mother and father dreamed as much as any rich guy dreams. >> absolutely. >> they don't get us. they don't get who we are. >> do you understand why some people listen to that and do believe that the obama campaign is engaged in class warfare? that this was very definitely an attack on the rich? >> here is the point, we believe strongly, and most americans do, that we honor success, we celebrate success, but we want everybody to have a fair chance
at it, a fair shot at it. and the question really is, moving forward, what kind of economic policies do we want? if governor romney says that his business experience informs him about how he's going to move forward, look at that business experience and ask if episodes like gs steel are the ones that we want governing our economy. we want an economy in which people can get the education they need and the training they need. we want an economy where there are good middle-class jobs available, and not where those jobs -- where wages are cut, benefits are cut, and people can't live a good middle class -- >> this happens to a lot of businesses, does it not, and it's happened over the course of time, that businesses -- this was in a particularly bad time for the steel industry, as you know, and isn't failure every much as instructive as success in terms of giving you an idea of what makes -- >> candy, let me ask you a question. if you were a worker at that
steel mill and you lost much of what you worked for over a period of decades, and your pension, it turns out, was underfunded by $46 million, your pension system, and you then watch the people who loaded your company with debt walk away with a profit while you were left without what you thought you earned. would you feel that was fair? >> if i were that person i certainly wouldn't. >> of course. well, i think that's the point. >> how i feel about it sort of is not at all germane. i was wondering if you think that isn't a business experience? i mean, romney's job, as you said -- >> i think -- look, i absolutely -- if you ask me was romney good at making money for himself and his partners? yes. if you ask me whether i think that outsourcing of jobs, offshoring of accounts, bankrupting companies and profiting off those bankruptcies are a prescription for building
the american economy and is good for -- is a good vision for our future, the answer to that is no. >> let me move you to the other thing that happened this week, which was "the new york times" report that a proposal before one of these super pacs, in this case a fairly wealthy conservative, although he says he's listed as an independent, that perhaps they would bring up reverend wright in a series of ads in time for the democratic convention. i want to play you some of the response from democrats to that. >> if ricketts wants to do that, if the gop, they want to do that? well, then guess what? you're putting mormonism on the table. >> should we look at the leaders of mitt romney's religion and examine whether they affected his politics? fair question, isn't it? >> then we have to say what are the views on the church that mitt romney put forth, the views that black people were subsidiary to and inferior to white people? >> david, simple question in the last 30 seconds we've got.
does the re-elect committee repudiate the idea that mormonism should be on the table? >> absolutely, and we have right along. we've said that's not fair game, and we wish that governor romney would stand up as strongly and as resolutely, consistently to refute these kinds of things on his side. instead, he's amplified them in the past and put logs on that fire, and that's not leadership. >> he did repudiate the reverend wright thing though, right? >> tepidly and reluctantly he did, but in february, he actually raised the issue and said he thought it was fair game. so, you know, the problem is you have to be consistent in your position, and you have to be genuine and firm in your position. you can't be grudging in your position or you send the wrong signals and i think he sent the wrong signals. >> yet you-all did put out a fund-raising letter on this, suggesting that mitt romney was going to -- suggesting that republicans would use it, although the super pac in
question said we're not going to -- >> we put out a fund-raising letter because we're facing about $1 billion of super pac spending. this was one gentleman who was willing to write a $10 million check potentially to fund this campaign. that was the proposal. and we're facing that all over the country. karl rove has a $25 million campaign up right now with undisclosed money, money we don't know where it came from, running negative ads. and that is what we are trying to combat. he got one $10 million anonymous donor. our average donation is $55. it would take 181,000 donations to match the one donation karl rove got anonymously. that's why we reached out to our folks. we need to combat this kind of tactic. >> david axelrod, it's always great to have you on. i appreciate it. >> thanks, candy. good to be with you. the republicans' playbook for defeating president obama, the economy. >> where we're headed under this president is an economic decline, and what it is going to take is to have a president who is willing to lead and to fight. >> but highlighting a faltering economy may not sit well with
republican governors in some key swing states. that with the chairman of the republican national committee. plus, the breaking news from libya that the lockerbie bomber has died. stay with us. of any small business credit card! pizza!!!!! [ garth ] olaf's small business earns 2% cash back on every purchase, every day! put it on my spark card! [ high-pitched ] nice doin' business with you! [ garth ] why settle for less? great businesses deserve the most rewards! awesome!!! [ male announcer ] the spark business card from capital one. choose unlimited rewards with 2% cash back or double miles on every purchase, every day! what's in your wallet?
or double miles on every purchase, every day! would you mind if to be i go ahead of you?omer. instead we had someone go ahead of him and win fifty thousand dollars. congratulations you are our one millionth customer. people don't like to miss out on money that should have been theirs. that's why at ally we have the raise your rate 2-year cd. you can get a one-time rate increase if our two-year rate goes up. if your bank makes you miss out, you need an ally. ally bank. no nonsense. just people sense. the key is to have a good strategy. the same goes for my retirement. with the plan my financial advisor and i put together, a quick check and i know my retirement is on course. [ male announcer ] with wells fargo advisor's envision plan, you always know where you stand. in fact, 93 percent of envision plan holders say they will retire on their own terms.
get started on the plan you need today -- wells fargo advisors. together we'll go far. you walk into a conventional mattress store, it's really not about you. they say, "well, if you wanted a firm bed you can lie on one of those. if you want a soft bed you can lie on one of those." we provide the exact individualization that your body needs. welcome to the sleep number memorial day sale. where you can celebrate our 25-year commitment to a single mission: better sleep for both of you. never tried this before.
this is your body there. you can see a little more pressure in the hips. take it up one notch. oh gosh, yes. when you're playing around with that remote, you get that moment where you go, "oh yeah" oh, yeah! ... and it's perfect. they had no idea that when they came to a sleep number store, we were going to diagnose their problems and help them sleep better. and right now, you can save 40% on our innovative sleep number silver edition bed-for a limited time. once you experience it, there's no going back. wow. hurry in to the sleep number memorial day sale between now and june 3rd. only at the sleep number store, where queen mattresses start at just $699. i tell you what i can spend. i do my best to make it work. i'm back on the road safely. and i saved you money on brakes. that's personal pricing.
i am joined by republican national committee chairman reince priebus. let me start out with where i left off with david axelrod, and that is these outside super pac groups. you-all spent about a day and a half trying to distance yourselves from the notion that reverend wright would be brought up by one of these fabulously wealthy people that want to come in and have their say-so in an election in the form of tv ads. isn't there just a huge problem here for you all as you move forward that you don't have or are not supposed to have control over what goes up on the air in your name? >> i think both sides have the same problem, and -- >> you have a lot more super pacs than we do. >> we don't know who's got what and how it's going to shake out. certainly obama spends nights raising tons of money whether it's george clooney and hollywood or people on wall street. mitt romney repudiated this particular issue and what's amazing about it to me, a day and a half spent and that the
media and "the new york times" would pick up on a proposal to perhaps do something in regard to a particular subject. i mean, this thing is so strong out, and to take a day and a half talking about this. you know what -- >> you know how this works. this was a big -- >> oh, i know how it works. it's the democrats and barack obama that want the story out there. he wants this story to play out in the media because for every day that david axelrod and this president don't have to talk about their broken promises when it comes to jobs, the debt, and the deficit, and the more time they can spend about talking about hypotheticals that may or may not come true, is a day they want to win on. so, look, this president's got a bigger problem, and his problem is no matter what he puts out there, no mat wear distractions he puts out there, he can't change the truth and escape the reality of where we are in this american economy. and it's no good. >> you know, mitt romney has to go through a lot of battle ground states and obviously that
is the message. this economy is still bad. we spent a lot of money, still bad. i can do this better. and yet you have states like ohio, florida, virginia, iowa all battlegrounds to some degree or another with republican governors who are out there going, hey, the economy is getting better. how are you going to synthesize republican governors in states where they're trying to do some good things, where the economy is improving, with romney coming in and saying the economy is really horrible. >> it starts at the top. this is going to be a referendum on whether or not barack obama fulfilled the promises he made to the american people. i get your point, but the reality is things could be much, much better if we had a president that could actually make a promise and follow through on a promise. you have someone like mitt romney who spent his entire life making promises, keeping promises, understands how businesses work, understands how small businesses work. helped save hundreds of businesses.
companies like staples and sports authority and others. no matter what david axelrod may say, president obama's business experience hasn't seen the inside of a lemonade stand. i think it's time to put someone in the white house that understands how job creation works in this country. >> the president has in fact during his term created jobs when we were hemorrhaging jobs when we started. >> mitt romney has helped create more net jobs in the state of massachusetts as governor than barack obama's helped net create in the entire country. >> he had a pretty bad record, at least in terms of the 50 states, in job creation. he was down near the bottom when he was governor. >> not only did he help create more net jobs than barack obama, he helped save the olympics, he helped save companies out there that were hurting, and the fact is every state has its own unique challenges, candy, and we all know that. wisconsin has different challenges than tennessee. we have different laws there than alabama. so every state is different, but
as far as massachusetts goes in a vacuum, they're much better off with a mitt romney governor than many others. and so i would say this, if david axelrod and this president want to make this campaign about jobs, which is what we want it to be about desperately and we're going to keep going back to that, there's no chance that barack obama wins the presidency in november if the issue is jobs. >> is there anything at all that you give the president credit for in the last 3 1/2 years, something he did good? >> certainly, i think we're all grateful and blessed that bin laden is not alive anymore, and we give him that, but, you know, when it comes to this country's long-term economic safety and long-term economic health, he has failed in regard to capturing -- >> but it's better now, is it not, than when he took office? >> absolutely not. >> you don't think the economy is better now than when he took office and everyone was tearing their hair off and jumping off cliffs? >> i think it's all relative. i think people across the country that can't fill up the gas tank because gas is too expensive, they can't buy a full set of groceries. if you look at what's happening
in greece, in europe, across the atlantic ocean, we can all live -- >> we can't help what's happening in greece, can he? >> what i'm say something we can't keep whistling past the graveyard. we have the debt king for a president who had added $5 trillion to the debt, who has not done a thing about getting the deficit under control as promised. he hasn't followed through on promises. while we may whistle past the graveyard today, the day is coming when i believe that the debt bomb facing this country is going to be a big problem for us, and we need a person like mitt romney in office that can do something about it. >> quickly, as of a year ago, more than half the babies born in the u.s. were minority. what is the implications of a majority minority, as we call, it for a party that is still seen and still is in reality largely white and largely male? >> well, i think we've had great successes when it comes to hispanic communities across america. you look at marco rubio, susana martinez, brian sandoval, the governor of puerto rico, but
it's not just messengers. i get it. as party chairman, it's our job to get into the communities, to do our social victories headquarters, to do headquarters in places like kissimmee and hialeah. the metrics on the ground matter, which is making sure we go to door to door, getting ballots in the municipal clerk's office and checking our success with what we're doing on the ground. >> i got to run. i hope you'll come back. >> that's a big question. >> i know that reince priebus, chairman of the national republican party. thank you for being here. next up, pushing tough decisions past election day could cripple the economy, so why won't somebody in washington do something?
tomorrow. it should be engraved on capitol hill. seven big tax provisions expire tend of the year, including the bush era tax cuts and social security payroll tax cut. on the spending side, no sign of major movement toward finding $1.2 trillion in discretionary spending cuts agreed to last year. according to some analysts, failure to do the must-dos could eat into the gross domestic product by as much as 3%. oh, and the government could hit the debt ceiling at the end of this year or early next. speaker boehner said next week he won't agree to raise it again without more cuts and he would like to have the argument now. >> it is a line in the sands because washington has kicked the can down the road, kicked the can down the road, and americans think we are crazy. >> boehner is accused of threatening to unhinge the economy and that is where it stands. up next, senators barbara boxer and kay bailey hutchison. [ femr kids are getting a dependable clean in the bathroom?
that you had been involved in the release of megrahi, had wanted to look more into this. as far as you're concerned, has justice been done in the lockerbie case? >> i don't believe so, and i wasn't for him being extradited. i've listened to the families. they feel some type of closure, but they also believe that there are more leads that have to be followed. and one thing we know about our country, we'll come after you. so we need to keep on searching. we really do. >> senator hutchison, do you similarly agree that there is more to be done in what was such a hellacious thing? it's history now to some of the folks listening, but it still was an ongoing case to so many. >> absolutely it was because it was an outrageous act, the fact that no one else has been convicted, that we didn't have that kind of opportunity to really find out and that he was actually let out of prison early i think does leave a question
and i agree with barbara 100%. >> i want to talk to you about what is going on on capitol hill, which appears to be really pretty much nothing in terms of final results. senator boxer, first to you, senator hutchison wrote an op-ed recently, i think this wednesday, about the number and the sheer amount of tax breaks that will expire at the end of the year if congress doesn't do something about it. and in there she wrote, there has been a conspicuous lack of urgency from both the president and congressional democrats about addressing these tax increases, and here she is talking about the health care tax increases going into effect, as well as the tax increases that will happen if nothing is done to maintain the tax cuts. the white house strategy seems to be, one, do not nothing until after the november election, two, blame a government shutdown and economic meltdown on
congress if it doesn't approve higher taxes before the end of 2012. i wanted to get your response. >> certainly. well, we absolutely are going to look at these tax cuts because the democrats believe it's very important to ensure that the middle class and the working poor have their tax cuts renewed and maybe even have deeper tax cuts, but we are also for fairness and justice, and we believe people earning over $1 million, multimillions, don't deserve to have another tax cut, don't need it, and a lot of my people in california say they don't want it. so there's a lot of other things that are on our plate also, and we need to move forward with jobs, jobs, jobs. and i will say something very positive here. kay bailey hutchison and i may not agree on everything about who should get a tax cut and how much it should be, but we do believe in creating jobs, and we work together on the faa bill. she was a key voice there.
i'm on that committee. she's the ranking member. and now i'm the chairman of the environment of public works committee, and she's a very key ranking member in negotiating an agreement on highways, roads, transit, and you know that will be 3 million jobs. >> which is great except -- >> so, yes, we have to approach it all. >> except for the problem here, senator hutchison, isn't it that you all both agree this something has to be done to address these tax increases that are going to happen if congress doesn't do something, and yet we have a stalemate and it seems to me that's always the case. everyone says we agree on the ultimate goal, but we can't agree on how to get there, and the country just gets this feeling that the entire process has broken down. >> well, first of all, i want to say thank you to barbara and agree that we are working together to lead our country in building the infrastructure and the planning capability for our highways and roads.
she's taking the lead on that as the chairman of the committee, doing a great job. but on tax cuts, honestly, we do have a disagreement with the democrats in congress. right now 50% of the people in this country don't pay taxes, and so you are taking care of the working poor with that. but on the other hand, we've got 25 million people will go into paying the amt, these are middle class people who are working every day, trying to do a little better for their families, they're going to go into the amt at the end of this year if we don't address it, if we don't keep these tax cuts that we have had in place. it is going to increase the tax on capital gains and dividends, on energy. we already see how high the energy costs are. it will increase the cost of energy. small business people need to be able to plan, and they are scared to death to hire people when you've got the obama taxes and fines coming into place at the end of this year plus an increase in everybody's taxes, and they're not hiring, and
that's what's causing our employment to be so low. we want to hire people. >> i think what you and senator boxer are both saying is you do agree with your parties' main line on these issues, and i get that. i want to posit something actually via david brooks who wrote an op-ed on friday about congress and said, leaders today do not believe their job is to restrain popular will. their job is to flatter and satisfy it. a gigantic polling apparatus has developed to help leaders anticipate and respond to popular whims. democratic politicians adopt the mindset of marketing executives. give the customer what he wants. the customer is always right. do you think politics has become too election-driven, too poll-driven, and that it impedes remarkably great people, you know, i know you both, i know a lot of people on capitol hill
and it is mystifying to people why there cannot be some coming together in something so important as the budget process. do you agree with the brooks column? >> well, let me take a shot at this. let me tell you what i agree with. i agree with the fact that we're not meeting each other in the middle. i agree with the fact that why do we need to fight over passing a violence against women act and have the house over there, instead of taking our bill that was a bipartisan bill, start a big fight, leave women out. we don't need that. why do we need to be in this conference on the highway bill that i mentioned before where 3 million jobs are at stake? the house could have worked with us, picked up the senate bill and passed it. so i don't think it's so much poll-driven as it is just a decision. and this is my view and, of course, kay is going to disagree with it, but it is backed up by two scholars who just wrote a very independent study, they're
nonpartisan, that said the republicans simply are in their corner, they won't move forward. now, i think what i hear coming from kay is some kind of crisis about tax cuts when we agree we're going to renew a lot of those to the middle class, and by the way, in the house they are taxing the working poor. that's the ryan budget. >> i'm going to have to give you the last 20 seconds here on that. >> sorry. >> yeah. candy, look, the congress, both the house and senate, rejected the obama budget 100%, not one democrat even voted for it because it had so many tax increases. what we're looking for is a way forward, leadership from the president, that would provide us a way to go forward, create jobs, keep taxes low on our small businesses, make sure they have the opportunity without strangling regulation to get this economy going again. that's why i am supporting mitt romney, because he has had the ability to see the private
sector work. it's not big government that's going to create jobs. it is the private sector, and we need to take the shackles off. that's what we're talking about. >> senators hutchison and boxer, i have to leave it there. i hope you will come back. i so enjoy having you. >> thank you. vice president joe biden in attack mode? >> i resent the fact they think we're talking about we're envy, it's job envy, it's wealth envy, that we don't dream. and later, when does a commencement address become a stump speech? hint, in an election year. which, last time i checked, was most women. sprinkle as much as you'd like into the wash to boost the scent. gain. anything but ordinary.
but when i was diagnosed with prostate cancer... i needed a coach. our doctor was great, but with so many tough decisions i felt lost. unitedhealthcare offered us a specially trained rn who helped us weigh and understand all our options. for me cancer was as scary as a fastball is to some of these kids. but my coach had hit that pitch before. turning data into useful answers.
we're 78,000 people looking out for 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. [ music plays, record skips ] hi, i'm new ensure clear. clear, huh? my nutritional standards are high. i'm not juice or fancy water, i'm different. i've got nine grams of protein. twist my lid. that's three times more than me! twenty-one vitamins and minerals and zero fat! hmmm. you'll bring a lot to the party. [ all ] yay! [ female announcer ] new ensure clear. nine grams protein. zero fat. twenty-one vitamins and minerals. in blueberry/pomegranate and peach. refreshing nutrition in charge!
here so hash out the week that was in politics, "new york times" political correspondent jeff zeleny and cnn senior congressional correspondent dana bash. i want to start by putting a period on the story you wrote this week which is the consideration of a proposal by a super pac that would bring up reverend wright again, timed to go with the democratic convention.
in the aftermath of all that, did someone win and someone lose or was it a summer squall? >> i think this is a summer squall, but the romney campaign wants to talk about the economy and they have a bunch of potential renegade super pac and wealthy republicans who mean well, who want the same outcome, but they're not on the same message perhaps. and pore president obama voters, independent voters may find it distasteful to bring up reverend wright. we did talk about reverend wright again this week, so it's not necessarily a win for obama either, but it just sends the message that the campaigns are not in control of their election. >> big time. look at romney's first ad this week. it was positive. it was really on the issues, what he would do on day one. you know, it might be a little bit too cute by half in that he can do that, and he can still have sideshows talking about things like reverend wright. whether or not they're going to put out an ad or not, he can distance himself and put out a narrative. >> this proposal we obtained, it was pretty far in the discussion phases.
>> very quickly after the story appeared it was nobody's plan and -- let's face it, the democrats are, they were fund-raising on it, saying they're coming after us, holy cow, when, in fact, nothing had happened. >> right. >> so it was good for both bases do you think? >> i mean, perhaps -- >> or bad for both. >> i think it shows neither campaign is in as much control of the election as they would like. there are these outside forces that want to spend a lot of money and a lot of consultants who are eager to spend their money for them. >> and the republicans do make a good point, that anytime the obama administration is not talking about the economy, if they're attacking the republicans attacking them, that's okay with them. >> i want to play you something marco rubio, often thought of as a short list for vice president, but certainly a star in the republican party, had to say
last night in south carolina. >> the strategy that this white house and this party is employing is a destructive one that pits americans against each other, rich versus poor, men versus women. never have we seen such an effort to divide the american people in an effort to win an election as we have seen today. >> so as i said, when we get to the superlatives and never, we are really heavy into an election season, a general election season, which seems to me to have started nasty and early. >> it doesn't feel like it's may, does it, if you get the feel of things like that. i think the beginning of what he said, he might have had a point. certainly there's no hiding the fact that the campaign strategy in chicago, the obama world, is the populist message and the war on women. the fact that it's more than ever in history is perhaps stretching. >> perhaps in the history since he's been in the senate. >> five minutes.
>> i want to put a period on one other issue that came up last week. that is the president's personal support for gay marriage. this is something -- we saw the naacp, first of all, come out yesterday and say we also support gay marriage as a civil right, which is very important to president obama because there were those in the african-american community who were not supportive, so to have this big prestigious group come out and say we're with him is great and this is what newt gingrich had to say. >> it's unfortunate that he's so political but it eliminates any attack on romney ever flip-flopping with obama flip-flopping on something so big and doing it after the people of north carolina voted no. it was almost like he was insulting the people of north carolina. >> he's talking about the president came out with his personal support for gay marriage, even after north carolina came out and said, no, we're against it. net gain or net loss for president obama or net we don't know? >> i think we don't know yet,
but there's no question that the naacp's support for this is very important. it gives this president and vice president a lot of cover among some black leaders and pastors and things but we still don't know how this will affect the campaign in states like ohio, these working class voters who may not be as far along on this issue. >> if you look at the way republican leaders reacted to his change, the president's change, the fact they stood back and they didn't want to touch it, they don't know, they think it might be a wash, because it's a 50/50 issue. >> right. even if it's a 50/50 issue, it depends on who actually votes only on that. >> it's still about the economy. >> exactly, exactly. i'm sorry it's so short. come back. >> thanks. president obama is talking about the next phase in afghanistan, but will the u.s. have to foot most of the bill? from helping to revitalize a neighborhood in brooklyn... financing industries that are creating jobs in boston... providing funding for the expansion of a local business serving a diverse seattle community...
and lending to ensure a north texas hospital continues to deliver quality care. because the more we can do in local neighborhoods and communities, the more we can help make opportunity possible. last season was the gulf's best tourism season in years. in florida we had more suntans... in alabama we had more beautiful blooms... in mississippi we had more good times... in louisiana we had more fun on the water. last season we broke all kinds of records on the gulf. this year we are out to do even better...
and now is a great time to start. our beatches are even more relaxing... the fishing's great. so pick your favorite spot on the gulf... and come on down. brought to you by bp and all of us who call the gulf home. do you guys ride? well... no. sometimes, yeah. yes. well, if you know anybody else who also rides, send them here -- we got great coverage.
certainly in the minds of many americans is will other members of nato besides the u.s. pony up the amount of money the u.s. would like to see to help keep afghanistan stable after combat ends? >> yes, indeed. i am optimistic about fund-raising for the afghan security forces because at the end of the day, it is less expensive to finance the afghan security forces to do the combat than to deploy our own troops. nevertheless, a number of countries have announced substantial contributions to the afghan security forces, so i'm optimistic. >> does france share that view? does germany share that view? we get the feeling and they have monetary problems of their own at the moment, spending problems of their own. but is your optimistic view shared by the individual members? >> yes, indeed. germany has announced a significant contribution to
afghan security forces. this is a responsibility for the whole international community. not only nato. not only isaf, but, of course, nato and isaf countries will pay their fair share of the total bill, but countries in general in the international community have a responsibility and also have an interest in insuring that the afghan security forces maintain a capability to take full responsibility for security in afghanistan after 2014. >> mr. secretary general, when you were on our show last, we spoke about libya and you said -- you called the attacks on libyan civilians by their government outrageous and
systematic and said it's hard to believe that they would ever stop as long as qadhafi is in power. why isn't that same metric applied to syria as far as nato's response is concerned? >> there is a clear difference between libya and syria. we took responsibility for the operation in libya to protect the civilian population because we had a clear mandate from the united nations, and we got clear support from a number of countries in the region. none of these conditions are fulfilled when it comes to syria. >> and i want to read you something that was said about the future of nato as we move beyond afghanistan. this was written by our cnn foreign affairs correspondent, and she wrote the decade long nato involvement in afghanistan
has produced what some have described as collective fatigue among european allies and questions about whether nato should be involved in conflicts outside of europe's backyard. what is your feeling? should state nato, when it's necessary, be involved in conflicts outside europe? >> they certainly know fatigue. on the contrary. you are never seen so many european forces deployed overseas and out of area than today, and in today's world our allies realize that territorial defense of our populations and our countries may very well start beyond our borders, like in afghanistan. we are in afghanistan to prevent the country from once again becoming a safe haven for terrorists who can use that safe haven as a launching pad for terrorist attacks against europe and north america, so though territorial defense remains the core task of nato, we realized that defense of our borders may very well start far from our borders in today's world.
>> nato secretary general anders fogh rasmussen, we so appreciate your time as always. good luck to you in chicago. this programming note, afghan president hamid karzai will sit down with an exclusive interview with wolf blitzer. watch for it tomorrow, 4 p.m. eastern in the sways room. time for a check of our top stories. the only person convicted in the 1988 lockerbie bombing has died. in 2001 a scottish court found ab deal hakim al magrahi guilty of the attack on pan am flight 23. the libyan national was freed in 2009 and allowed to return home after doctors at the time said he had only three months to live. 270 people died in the lockerbie explosion. and at least seven people are dead after an earthquake in northern italy. the 6.0 magnitude quake struck overnight in bologna. at least 50 people have been injured. authorities are still assessing the damage.
the same area was struck by a 5.3-magnitude quake in january. next it is the end of a school year and the beginning of a general election campaign and you know what that means. >> hello, class of 2012! wwaandndaa sysykkees: ggaainin apappplle e mmaano isis iinsnspipireredd byby alalll yoyouu wn whwhoo hihitt ththee dadr aannd d sshhakakee wht yoyouurr m moommmamass ga. sven's home security gets the most rewards of any small business credit card!
how does this thing work? oh, i like it! [ garth ] sven's small business earns double miles on every purchase, every day! woo-hoo!!! so that's ten security gators, right? put them on my spark card! why settle for less? testing hot tar... great businesses deserve the most rewards! [ male announcer ] the spark business card from capital one. choose unlimited rewards with double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase, every day! what's in your wallet? here's your invoice. what's in your wallet? last season was the gulf's best tourism season in years. in florida we had more suntans... in alabama we had more beautiful blooms... in mississippi we had more good times... in louisiana we had more fun on the water. last season we broke all kinds of records on the gulf. this year we are out to do even better... and now is a great time to start. our beatches are even more relaxing... the fishing's great. so pick your favorite spot on the gulf... and come on down. brought to you by bp and all of us who call the gulf home. i saved a fortune on car insurance with progressive. now i'm just out here saving fortunes forward.
i want you to look into this ball right here. tell me what you see. savings. that's absolutely right. and it's in your future. close your eyes. man: all right. go to progressive.com. i see flo. that's a good sign. that's a good sign. it's your portal to the realm of savings. this is your heart line. this is your savings line. you see how they intertwine? yes. savings equals love, honey. yes.
it's graduation time in an election year, and you know what that means. a campaign trail running through commencement. >> we can assume that there were founding mothers whispering smarter things in the ears of the founding fathers. >> fresh off all that campaign chatter about the importance of the female vote, president obama went to new york to toast the graduating class at barnard, an all-women's school. >> i'm not saying the only way to achieve success is by climbing to the top of the corporate ladder or running for office, although, let's face it, congress would get a lot more done if you did. >> he railed against a cynical off-point media, a gridlocked congress, and ticked off a few of his priorities. >> we developed more clean energy, so we could use less foreign oil and reduce the carbon pollution that's threatening our planet.
>> when there are rules that stop big banks from making bad bets with other people's money. >> when insurance couples aren't allowed to drop your coverage when you need it most. >> 48 hours earlier, mitt romney was busy bonding with conservative christian voters at liberty university, founded by the late jerry fallwell, one of the most influential evangelicals of the 20th century. >> today, we remember him as a courageous and big-hearted minister of the gospel who never feared an argument and never hated an adversary. >> liberty is in lynchberg, virginia, which is, p.s., a swing state. >> strikes me as odd that the free exercise of religious faith is sometimes treated as a problem, something america is stuck with instead of being blessed with. perhaps religious conscience upsets the design for those that feel the highest wisdom and authority comes from government. >> so far as we can tell, liberty is romney's only