tv The Best of The Situation Room CNN June 22, 2013 3:00pm-4:01pm PDT
with no tether. this crossing is life or death and it is important i'm mentally in control of everything. >> well, nick will step out on that steel cable tomorrow at 8:00 p.m. eastern. you have to tune in at 7:00 one hour from now. it's going to be a great show. i'm don lemon, cnn world headquarters. see you back here in one hour. new evidence in a mysterious and deadly airline crash. investigators say the official cause is wrong. the feds release a video of bombing in times square. they want your help finding the attacker. and the surprising ingredients in many burritos. a major fast food chain comes clean about its menu. welcome to our viewers in the united states and around the world. wolf blitzer is off today. i'm jim acosta. you are in "the situation room." we begin with what senators are calling a border surge, a breakthrough deal to double the size of the border patrol and hundreds of miles of security
fence. it may be the best hope for passing immigration reform. the senate will need a big enough vote to give the bill momentum because in the house immigration reform is a very tough sell. here's cnn's chief congressional correspondent, dana bash. >> reporter: for republicans in particular it's all about border security. that's why they call an immigration deal to beef it up a breakthrough. >> the border should not be an issue if this amendment passes. >> reporter: it includes doubling the number of border agents to 40,000 and completing the 700-mile southern border fence. republican supporters emphasize border security measures must be completed and certified before some 11 million illegal immigrants can get on a 13-year path to u.s. citizenship. >> 11 million people live in the shadows, and they live here in defacto amnesty and, by god, they are being exploited every single day. >> a bipartisan bill to fix our broken immigration system.
>> reporter: president obama wants immigration reform for his legacy. many republicans want it to keep the party viable in the future since hispanic voters are fleeing the gop. only 27% voted for mitt romney in 2012, a precipitous drop since george w. bush won 44% in 2004. he also tried but failed to get immigration reform. still, much of the gop base opposes any path to citizenship. many republican senators will still vote no. >> amnesty will occur. that's the one thing we can be sure of and it will be first. >> we asked florida republican marco rubio, elite gop supporter, about conservative criticism. for someone like you from a diverse state with likely higher ambition politically, this is important. for somebody who is in a conservative, very red state, voting for something like immigration reform hurts them rather than helps them. how do you overcome that? >> well, i understand why conservatives are upset. they've seen all these promises in the past that haven't been
delivered. that's why we're saying that nobody can become a legal, permanent resident of the united states unless these border measures pass. we shouldn't do this for politics. i can tell you politically this is as much a negative as it is a positive. people are really upset and i respect it and i understand it. >> reporter: few politicians have as much at stake here as rubio, a cuban american with presidential aspirations, who would need those upset conservatives to win a gop nomination. in all candor, how much of your personal credibility and viability is on the line here? nobody talks about this without talking about marco rubio in the same breath politically. >> i honestly have not analyzed it that way. >> reporter: come on. >> no. because if i wanted to do something political the easiest thing to do politically is not deal with the issue. give a couple speeches and not get involved. i'm dealing with this because this is hurting our country badly. >> reporter: many of rubio's fellow republicans are simply not buying that argument. positions there seem to be hardening against immigration reform rather than softening for it. the house speaker john boehner
even compared immigration reform to obama care, which does not bode well for a passing a republican led house and eventually going to the president's desk. dana bash, cnn capitol hill. okay. let's bring in chief political correspondent candy crowley anchor of "state of the state the union" and senior political analyst ron brownstein editorial director of "the national journal" and peter hanby joining us from san jose, california the site of the net roots nation conference going on out there. candy, first to you. this was billed by several senators as a big breakthrough on this issue of immigration reform but it's still got to go through the house. >> a big breakthrough for getting it through the senate which tells you how difficult this issue is. and here is the biggest problem. when you mention marco rubio or john mccain, these are national politicians looking at a national picture. you go over to the senate and -- i'm sorry -- you go over to the
house and there are people that don't have ambitions to be president or to be the spokesman on, you know, the republican spokesman on the fence, whatever it happens to be. they're interested in their district, and their district is not interested in a bill that doesn't toughen, number one, penalties for those in the country without documentation. they favor just a wholly different thing. >> a couple things. the question is whether they have ambition to work with another republican president. that is really the debate and the challenge in the republican party between the macro and micro politics. there is no question at the leadership level of the party there is a broad understanding that unless they improve their vote among minorities it is very difficult to win the white house. mitt romney won a higher share of white voters than ronald reagan did in 1980 and he lost. there is that understanding. on the other hand as candy points out 80% of the house republicans are in districts that are more white than the national average. in this gerrymandering they've segregated themselves from the democratic charges that are making it hard to win the presidency. the interests are very
different. even in polling, our exit polling during 2012, most republican -- most rank and file republicans believe there needs to be some pathway to legalization. deportation is a minority position even among republicans. >> i've heard that from several conservatives in the house. hey, barack obama won a second term. hey, i want another term in the house. so, you know, what's the big deal? i mean, there is another problem in the house in that john boehner, we saw this week with the failure of the farm bill, he has a very tough time, still, corralling this raucous, caucus, sometimes unruly house members that don't want to listen to leadership. >> i don't think he has much control. certainly as compared to other leaders he does not have control of this group because they're really not beholden to him in the way that in the olden days, say, ten years ago, people were beholden to the speaker for various things. this is a group quite willing to go out on their own and they turned down a farm bill that they thought -- republicans thought would pass.
they're blaming democrats. >> what happened on the farm bill could be precisely what happens on immigration. they passed a very conservative amendment on foodstamps trying to mollify the conservative critics. that, then, grove away democrats on final passage and the conservatives, 60 of the conservatives, still voted against the final bill even after they got the amendment. you can imagine the exact same dynamic where very conservative amendments on enforcement are added to the bill to try to mollify the conservative critics of immigration and many oppose it anyway and democrats can't fight with that, you know, with that brick in the meal. >> at the heart of this issue is border security. that is what beefed up that bill on the senate side. looking at our latest cnn/orc poll 62% favor border security in the immigration bill. 36% prefer a path to citizenship. that's what's more important to those voters who were sampled in that poll. but as it turns out, this is all about border security. if those measures aren't beefed up enough to satisfy a lot of those conservatives in the
house, it's going to be trouble. >> and for that they probably would blame ronald reagan because the mantra you hear constantly is see we had immigration reform during the reagan years and this was going to fix everything and what did we end up with? 11 million plus however many undocumented workers here. so what they're looking for is a certain thing. and the fact is this is a very -- border security is a very hard thing to guarantee. >> we talked a little bit about 2016. let's talk about that a little bit with our peter hamby who is out at the net roots nation forum. and, peter, you had a chance to catch up with former presidential candidate howard dean and, you know, he said something about 2016 that made a lot of people in washington say, whoa. wait a minute. what's going on here? howard dean might actually run for president again? i want to talk to you about that, peter. of course we have to remind our viewers why this may be a little far fetched for the former vermont governor. let's take a look. >> we're going to south carolina
and oklahoma and arizona and north dakota and new mexico. we're going to california and texas and new york. we're going to south dakota and oregon and washington and michigan. and then we're going to washington, d.c. to take back the white house! now, peter, did howard dean say it just like that to you when he was talking to you about this? >> really surprising. he said it just like that. it was weird. no. i sat down with him yesterday. he makes the rounds of liberal gatherings like this one, net roots nation here in california and he said, i asked him at the end of an interview about the state of the democratic party if he would be open to running again and he repeatedly refuse today rule it out. i found him surprisingly engaged on the question. he said he has mixed feelings about it. but he is refusing to close the door, jim. he said he would run if he saw a space to sort of agitate for issues on the left if he didn't
see the candidate who is the front-runner talking about the issues and of course the pew to the front-runner for the nomination if she decides to run would be hillary clinton. dean said that, quote, she will not get a pass if she runs for president sort of promising that she will have a primary on the democratic side whether it's from him or somebody else. you know, it sounds far fetched to people in washington perhaps, but he does still connect with liberals, activists out here. we're totally excited to see him when he arrives. so it's not totally far fetched on the left side of the democratic party, jim. >> howard dean did get kind of a raw deal on the scream thing. if you go back -- candy, you were there that night and you remember how loud it was. but i've seen people show that video again and if you isolate the audio, sure it sounds like howard dean is screaming but he is basically screaming at the volume level of the -- >> and the man behind him, tom harken. howard dean had lost and harken said to him before you go out there pump them up.
get them going. you know. so it did not play in the room the way it played on tv. i can tell you that. we didn't know until we arrived in new hampshire that it had gotten such play. we all just got on the plane, oh, that was interesting. having said that, there are comebacks and i mean people get into a presidential race for a couple reasons. one is you think you can win and one is you want to help drive the agenda or you want to push the party to the left. i can see howard dean wanting to get in to drive the agenda. it's so hard to be yesterday's news in a presidential election unless you're -- >> what about this? you know, a lot of people talked about 2016 as being a cornation for hillary clinton on the democratic side but there is always that opening. >> yes, sure. >> barack obama was really -- >> he was at the coronation last time. >> someone will run. from hillary clinton's point of view it is fine if it is someone like howard dean. >> she would prefer that. the most likely outcome is you
get a gad fly type opponent as opposed to someone more from the center -- from the main stream of the party. someone out there to make a point as candy is saying. i mean, she is as prohibitive a favorite as there has been and often that goes right before a fall but right now it looks more like if she gets an opponent it would be more likely to be someone like this who is coming from kind of the edge of the party to make a point than someone who could try to grow into a genuine competitor. >> peter, one of the things you also pointed out is that they played this video from president obama to the folks there in the room and there wasn't exactly wild applause for the president. what was going on there? >> jim, there is a lot of anxiety here at this conference started in 2006 as sort of a spin-off of the liberal blog culture that emerged during the bush administration. senator obama came to this conference in 2007 and was sort of beloved by the bloggers and liberal activists here. last night during the opening session the white house sent along the youtube video that they ran in between a speech
from howard dean and women's activist sandra fluke. it was sort of met by polite applause. look, you know, there are a lot of issues here that the -- that liberals take issue with. in d.c. we talk a lot about the president not, you know, meeting in the middle. out here the concern is that the president hasn't gone far enough. you know, on issues like the keystone pipeline on foreclosures, on bank regulation. the most popular politician here, you know, talking about 2016, perhaps, is elizabeth warren. there is a group here giving out elizabeth warren t-shirts and bumper stickers. she is the massachusetts senator who sort of endeared herself to the left talking about student loan reform, talking about regulating wall street. and, you know, president obama is almost kind of an after thought here, which is kind of startling given the way he sort of captured the hearts and minds of liberals five years ago, jim. >> well, time moves on and i guess the parties as well or at least the base of parties. peter, thanks for that from san jose. appreciate it.
candy crowley, ron brownstein thanks for your perspective. up next cnn is on the front lines of serious civil war with pro government fighters openly angry at the u.s. and senator john mccain joins us to vent his strong differences with the president over syria. that's coming up. i am an american success story. i'm a teacher. i'm a firefighter. i'm a carpenter. i'm an accountant. a mechanical engineer. and i shop at walmart. truth is, over sixty percent of america shops at walmart every month. i find what i need, at a great price. and the money i save goes to important things. braces for my daughter. a little something for my son's college fund. when people look at me, i hope they see someone building a better life. vo: living better: that's the real walmart.
at university of phoenix we kis where it can take you.cation (now arriving: city hospital) which is why we're proud to help connect our students with leading employers across the nation. (next stop: financial center) let's get to work. what'the truth is, americans are already seeing the benefits. she's seeing more seniors for free wellness visits. he received a $150 rebate from his health insurance company. and next year, she can expand her small business, thanks to tax credits that cover up to half of her workers' health insurance. better coverage and lower costs. that's what obamacare means for them. get all the facts at: barackobama.com/healthcare
folks have suffered from frequent heartburn but now, thanks to treating with prilosec otc, we don't have to suffer like they used to. [ bell dings ] ♪ [ horse whinnies ] getting heartburn and then treating day after day is a thing of the past. block the acid with prilosec otc, and don't get heartburn in the first place. we've sure come a long way. ♪ [ male announcer ] one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn.
syrian rebels say they've received heavy weapons including antitank and antiaircraft missiles from what they call brotherly nations that back the revolution. there is no word yet from the obama administration on what kind of weapons it plans to give the free syrian army but the military aid comes as rebels are losing ground to pro government forces. cnn's inside syria with some of the forces fighting for the assad regime. >> reporter: the urban combat is fierce. in a suburb of damascus close to the city center. we're on the front line with palestinians fighting for the assad regime. snipers do much of the fighting
and death can come any second. >> this is a pro government sniper position and this fighter here just told me he sees the snipers through his scope from here. so we'll wait and see what happens. the man said that shot took out a rebel fighter. yarmuk which was set up as a palestinian refugee camp by the assad regime decades ago bears the scars of war but the pro government fighters tell me like on other front lines in syria they are now turning the tide, winning background. i asked the commander who his enemy is. they are mostly islamists from al qaeda, he says, mostly foreigners from the emirates, from afghanistan, and pakistan. but also syrians and palestinians. a lot of the fighting happens inside the houses and here only
a wall of sand bags separates the two sides. the pro government militia men say the rebels knock these holes into the walls when they owned this turf and rigged some of the passages with explosives when they fled. the men tell me they've recently retaken this house and as you can see the fighters from the other side booby trapped this entrance with what looks like a hand grenade or something so anybody who would have gone through there and triggered that wire would have been killed. the pro government fighters say they're angry at the u.s. after the obama administration's announcement that it will help arm the opposition. we will keep fighting until we get rid of al qaeda and all other insurgents in syria and we're sure that god will be on our side. in breaks from combat the pro government militia men sing the praise of syrian president bashar alasa.
emboldened by reecent victories on the battle field. >> senator mccain makes a passionate case for giving much stronger u.s. military support to syria's rebels along with a no fly zone to help even the odds. listen first to president obama and then my interview with senator mccain. there are some very sharp differences. >> if you haven't been in the situation room, poring through intelligence and meeting directly with our military folks and asking what are all our options and examining what are all the consequences and understanding that, for example, if you set up a no fly zone, that you may not be actually solving the problem on the ground. >> senator, it sounds like you're not getting your no fly zone or even something close to it. does that mean the rebels are doomed in syria? >> i don't believe the rebels are doomed but i don't think there is any doubt that on the
battle field the advantage is clearly with bashar assad. why wouldn't there be? tons of russian equipment coming in, the iranian revolutionary guard, jihadists from all over the region, 5,000 hezbollah fighters, and he is still calling it a civil war. what it's turning into is a regional conflict, and the deciding factor on the battle field is air power. we have got to -- and just as the israelis have shown with stand off missiles they are able to hit targets that they want eliminated. it is shameful. >> would you like to sit down with the president and talk about this? >> i have. i have already. >> what is his response when you make that case? >> he said he understands my points and he respects it. just as i respect his position. but obviously he has not agreed. and the influence -- >> is it just that he's maybe an anti -- just anti-war to some extent? he came into the white house being the anti-war candidate as
you know, very much opposed to the iraq war. he said in germany he is the president who is all about ending wars not starting wars, made that comment. is he philosophically opposed to ratcheting things up in syria do you think? >> no. i think he has beliefs that are genuine and sincere and obviously different from mine and most other experts. look, the middle east is about to erupt. this is turning into a regional conflict. lebanon is destabilized, jordan, the king of jordan can't last. the conflict is spreading throughout the region. hezbollah is all in. this is becoming a sunni-shia conflict, iran/saudi arabia, russia/u.s. it's an unfair fight. >> what about that video of the rebel fighter? you've seen it on youtube. it shows a rebel fighter eating a heart of a syrian government
military service member. why would we want to get involved in something like that? >> i think it's terrible. i think it's horrible. i think civil wars are probably the bloodiest and worst of all. the difference between that individual and that atrocious act is that that was an individual act by a deranged individual. bashar al assad has a strategy of rape, torture, and murder. there are mass graves that have been found all over syria. so it is -- his people and hezbollah and others are trained to inflict torture and to indulge, engage in mass rapes in order to cow the population and commit mass murder. that's the difference. we're talking about 93,000 people dead. the president said now we know chemical weapons killed a hundred people. what about the other 92,800 and whatever it is? look, this is an unfair fight.
it's shameful. if bashar assad stays in power and the iranians are able to make sure that happens, imagine the position of power that iran has in the region and look what happens if bashar assad fails. it is a great blow to iran the greatest in 25 years and they're cut off from hezbollah which means hezbollah would die on the vine. that's why they're all in this conflict. now we're talking about giving them light weapons. light weapons do not do well against scud missiles and tanks. it's just shameful. >> senator mccain we know where you stand on this issue and appreciate your time very much. we'll be talking to you soon. thank you, sir. >> thanks for having me on. up next, a look at what is in your food, specifically your fast food. chipotle says many of its ingredient are the products of gene tweaking. we'll look inside. and that means jobs, lots of people,
making lots and lots of things. let's get your business rolling now, everybody sing. ♪ norfolk southern what's your function? ♪ ♪ helping this big country move ahead as one ♪ ♪ norfolk southern how's that function? ♪ if you have high cholesterol, here's some information that may be worth looking into. in a clinical trial versus lipitor, crestor got more high-risk patients' bad cholesterol to a goal of under 100. getting to goal is important, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over time. and that's why when diet and exercise alone aren't enough to lower cholesterol i prescribe crestor. [ female announcer ] crestor is not right for everyone. like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness,
feel unusually tired, have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. is your cholesterol at goal? ask your doctor about crestor. [ female announcer ] if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. well, everything but palm trees, sunshine and fruity drinks, that is. bulldog: ahh, the dog days of summer...
bulldog: ahh, the dog days time to celebrate with your mates... grill a few dogs... eh, hot dogs. bacon burgers... dachshund: mattress discounters' 4th of july sale!? bulldog: that cloud reminds me of... radio: the tempur-pedic cloud collection. bulldog: that's it! radio: ...now with 48 months interest-free financing... bassett hound: free financing? radio: or get a queen size sealy gel memory foam mattress for just $497. bulldog: that's a ringer of a deal! radio: the 4th of july sale is on now... bulldog: hey where is everyone going? ♪ mattress discounters
here is a question. would you like genetically modified ingredients in that burrito? it might be tough to avoid. chipotle, which may be among the more health conscious chains, admits some of its ingredients are products of gene tweaking. cnn's brian todd has details. i can't believe we're using the words gene tweaking and burrito in the same sentence but we are. >> a frightening thought, jim. chipotle immensely popular. one of the reasons chipotle brought in $273 billion in revenue last year is because it has marketed itself as a healthier alternative to just about every other fast food chain. well, chipotle's recent effort to be more transparent may also put a dent in that reputation. from its menu to its website to a short film it commissioned featuring willie nelson covering
cold play -- ♪ i was just guessing at numbers and figures ♪ >> reporter: chipotle mexican grill constantly promotes its commitment to healthy ingredients like naturally raised grilled chicken but has recently become clean becoming one of the first fast food chains to admit it has genetically modified organisms in many of its top selling dishes -- in chicken and steak, tortillas. genetically modified organisms. in english what are they and why should we be concerned? >> when foods are genetically modified, their genetic material has been unnaturally changed. >> reporter: that's because it has been processed and grown on factory like farms this nutritionist says. she contends the soybean oil that chipotle says it mariner ates chicken in can in high quantities lead to higher risk of heart disease or arthritis. soybean oil is also used in some other chipotle dishes. if you want a chipotle dish without genetically modified ingredients don't go with the
instinct so many people have with the standard burrito, chicken, steak, and rice. you'll have to order a dish with some pork, lettuce, beans, maybe some salsa. chipotle didn't provide someone to speak on camera but a company spokesman told us they're moving away from soybean oil in most dishes. recently they switched to sun flower oil to make taco shells and chips. better? >> oh, great. that's great news for people who love chips. because if they're made with whole corn and a healthy oil like sun flower oil, they're actually good for you. >> reporter: chipotle says the food industry in america is dominated by artificially processed ingredients, that it's hard to get away from them. how hard? on its website chipotle still places a g for genetically mod fitd next to its ingredients list for chicken, steak, tortillas, for half its foods. chipotle says it is constantly seeking ways to move away from all of this to healthier mixtures and that unlike so many other fast food chains at least it's telling customers about its artificial ingredients. we asked people coming out of
the chipotle if this would steer them away. >> absolutely. >> why? >> because i care about what i put in my body. >> no it wouldn't because the vast majority of u.s. produce is injected with chemicals. >> reporter: on the comments from the nutritionist that soybean oil in some chipotle foods raises your risk for heart disease or arthritis the soy foods association pointed us to an expert who flat out disputed that saying key omega acids in soybean oil actually reduced those risks. >> it would be great to see some of the other fast food chains follow suit. >> chipotle has to get credit for coming clean on the website. still to come a new documentary's controversial claim about a deadly air disaster, plus video of an unsolved bombing in the heart of new york city. ( bell rings ) they remind me so much of my grandkids.
it's been pretty tough since jack passed away. it's a good thing you had life insurance through the colonial penn program. you're right. it was affordable, and we were guaranteed acceptance. guaranteed acceptance? it means you can't be turned down because of your health. you don't have to take a physical or answer any health questions. they don't care about your aches and pains. well, how do you know? did you speak to alex trebek? because i have a policy myself. it costs just $9.95 a month per unit. it's perfect for my budge my rate will never go up. and my coverage will never go down because of my age. affordable coverage and guaranteed acceptance? we should give them a call. do you want to help protect your loved ones from the burden of final expenses? if you're between 50 and 85, you can get quality insurance that does not require any health questions or a medical exam. your rate of $9.95 a month per unit will never increase,
and your coverage will never decrease -- that's guaranteed. so join the six million people who have already called about this insurance. whether you're getting new insurance or supplementing what you already have, call now and ask one of their representatives about a plan that meets your needs. so, what are you waiting for? go call now! we'll finish up here.
demands are being made for a new investigation into the horrific mid air explosion of a twa jet that happened 17 years ago off the coast of long island killing all 230 people onboard. now a new documentary is fueling suspicions that a missile might have actually caused the crash. in the film six retired members of the original investigative team break their silence and challenge the ntsb's official finding that faulty wiring to a fuel tank was to blame. >> what would your analysis have been? >> the primary conclusion was the explosive forces came from outside the airplane. not the center fuel tank. >> would that statement have been in your analysis? >> if i got the right one. the agenda was that this is an
accident. make it so. >> the investigators won't speculate about the source of the explosion but the documentary suggests that crucial evidence has been kept under wraps. >> the family members need to know what happened to their loved ones. this investigation was -- not one single eyewitness was allowed to testify. that's unheard of. you know, let the eyewitnesses speak publicly at a government hearing. reopen the investigation and find out what really happened. and stop this facade that's been going on for too long. >> this has gotten a lot of people talking about this this week so let's dig deeper into the crash investigation and the doubt surrounding it. cnn's tom foreman joins us now. tom, there are some pretty startling claims being made in all of this that perhaps what we knew is not what we should have been told at the time. >> yes, pretty strong pushback against it because of the basic facts we've known for quite sometime. twa flight 800 took off at 8:20 on the evening of july 17th,
1996. it was still light out. the weather forecast for the flight to paris called for smooth sailing and for 12 minutes it was. >> we just saw an explosion out here. >> two other pilots were in the air and saw the explosion. >> just blew up in the air and then we saw two fire balls go down to the water. >> reporter: other eyewitnesses were on long island. >> it looked like a mile in the sky of flame coming down, you know, straight down. i thought it was coming from the ground up because the flame looked like it was shooting from the ground up if you know what i mean. >> reporter: 230 men, women, and children were aboard flight 800. everyone died. people thought terrorism immediately and an alert went out to the fbi. the navy sent state-of-the-art salvage ships. investigators ended up recovering 97.5% of the plane. in a giant hangar they actually put twa flight 800 back together and reconstructed the plane's last seconds. early on they determined the center fuel tank blew up, causing the nose and first class section of the jet to break off
and fall away. incredibly, the coach section kept flying for about 30 more seconds. evidence pointed not to one explosion but two. the second blast half a minute after the first erupted when the left wing tore away from the back half of the plane, leaking fuel from the much larger wing tank until something touched off a spark. that, they say, is why people saw a line of flames shooting upward. those eyewitness accounts of a trail of fire hit the internet less than 36 hours after the explosion. people speculated it was a terrorist surface-to-air missile. then a document began circulating on the web, taking the missile theory in a new direction. it said a u.s. navy ship accidently shot down flight 800 and a coverup reaching the highest levels of government was in play. it might have stayed an internet conspiracy theory had it not been for one man. >> it's a document that i got about five weeks ago from an
intelligence agent of france. >> reporter: in march of 1997, pierre salinger claimed to have verified the friendly fire coverup, specifically naming the u.s.s. normandy as the ship that fired the missile. but there was a problem with his claim. his proof turned out to be the same unsubstantiated document that had been on the internet for months. investigators concluded the u.s.s. normandy never fired any of its missiles and even if it had it was out of range. more than four years after that explosion, in august of 2000, the ntsb finally released its final report concluding that twa flight 800 was the victim of fundamental design problems with the engineering and wiring that cracked allowing high voltage into the center fuel tank full of highly explosive fumes. that remains the official story and one reason, jim, people
close to the investigation are pushing back so hard against this documentary suggesting otherwise. >> but it is a fascinating story and subject to go back and take a look at. and those images from that documentary that you had in your piece of them reconstructing the plane, so many americans remember that and obviously these questions are being raised. they'd like to get to the bottom of it. >> extraordinary work. these questions have been raised numerous times since then. this is just the latest iteration of them. >> thank you. up next a bombing in new york's times square, a case that's gone cold but there are new clues and investigators are asking the public for help. [ female announcer ] the only patch for the treatment
of mild to moderate alzheimer's disease is exelon patch. now with more treatment options, exelon patch may improve overall function and cognition. your loved one can get a free 30-day trial. and you can have access to nurses. it does not change how the disease progresses. hospitalization, and rarely death, have been reported from wearing more than one patch at a time. the most common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fall, loss of appetite or weight, application site redness, and urinary tract infection. the likelihood and severity of these side effects may increase as the dose increases or if patients weigh less than 110 pounds. people at risk for stomach ulcers who take certain other medicines should talk to their doctor as serious stomach problems such as bleeding may worsen. patients may experience slow heart rate. free trial offer for them. nurses to talk to for you. visit exelonpatchoffer.com.
investigators are asking for the public's help to solve a bombing right in the heart of new york city. the case has gone cold but there are new clues to share and cnn's mary snow has the latest. >> hey there, jim. you may remember this was a small bombing back in 2008. fortunately, there were no casualties, but it remains of concern to the fbi and the fbi has released new images with the aim of getting someone to talk. it says the bomber may not have acted alone, that there may have been as many as five people
acting as lookouts. a new push in an unsolved case of a possible serial bomber in new york city. the fbi is hoping surveillance video and a $65,000 reward will nab the person responsible for setting off a bomb in 2008 outside a military recruiting station in new york's times square. authorities also believe it could be linked to similar incidents. one in 2005 at the british consulate and another in 2007 at the mexican consulate. in the times square case the device was set off in the middle of the night and no one was injured. what is known is that someone was seen riding on a bicycle before the device was detonated. carlos fernandez is the fbi's acting special agent in charge in new york. how powerful is that device? >> it was, according to our forensics people and our explosive experts it was powerful and we're very concerned about a device like that going off in new york. >> reporter: the fbi says the
device was built using an ammuniti ammunition cap, black powder and a fuse. cnn was told bomb technicians say the times square bomb was stronger than the device detonated during the boston marathon in terms of destructive capability. but unlike the bombs used in boston, it contained no shrapnel. after the recruitment center was targeted, a possible motive emerged as being military related. the nypd's matthew pontillo says that is just one theory. >> that military type ammunition came as a very, very common device available in hardware stores and army/navy stores. essentially a steel box. and it may have just been something that was available to the person. but we really don't know for certain. >> reporter: the fbi is looking to the public for help. it's a tactic the agency used in other cases including whitey bulger. when a tip led to bulger's arrest after being on the lam for decades. now the fbi is turning to social
media, putting up hash tags and billboards hoping someone will come forward. so why is the fbi making this push now? it says when the five-year anniversary came up in the unsolved case it decided to appeal to the public. jim? >> mary snow, thank you very much for that. coming up next, my interview with senator rand paul. he says the director of national intelligence, james clapper, lied when he told congress in march that the government was not collecting data on americans. we'll have him explain that. i'm gonna have to ask you to power down your little word game. i think your friends will understand. oh...no, it's actually my geico app...see? ...i just uh paid my bill. did you really? from the plane? yeah, i can manage my policy, get roadside assistance, pretty much access geico 24/7. sounds a little too good to be true sir. i'll believe that when pigs fly. ok, did she seriously just say that? geico. just a click away with our free mobile app.
what'the truth is, americans are already seeing the benefits. she's seeing more seniors for free wellness visits. he received a $150 rebate from his health insurance company. and next year, she can expand her small business, thanks to tax credits that cover up to half of her workers' health insurance. better coverage and lower costs. that's what obamacare means for them. get all the facts at: barackobama.com/healthcare
folks have suffered from frequent heartburn but now, thanks to treating with prilosec otc, we don't have to suffer like they used to. [ bell dings ] ♪ [ horse whinnies ] getting heartburn and then treating day after day is a thing of the past. block the acid with prilosec otc, and don't get heartburn in the first place. we've sure come a long way. ♪ [ male announcer ] one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn.
reassure the american public that those recently disclosed and controversial surveillance programs are a good thing but not everyone agrees including one potential presidential contender. joining us now is the republican senator from kentucky rand paul. senator paul, thanks very much for joining us. let's get right to it. earlier today as you know at this hearing the head of the nsa, general keith alexander, said that the surveillance programs stopped a number of attacks over the last several years. he even detailed some of the attacks. let's take a listen to what he had to say and then get your reaction. >> in recent years, the information gathered from these programs provided the u.s. government with critical leads to help prevent over 50 potential terrorist events and more than 20 countries around the world. >> senator paul, general alexander, the other officials at this hearing, they said the surveillance programs stopped an attack on the new york subway system, on the new york stock exchange, and others. do you buy what the general and
the other officials were saying? >> well, frankly, they told us four months ago they weren't collecting any data on american citizens, which was an outright lie, so i think they're at a bit of a credibility gap at this point. the other question i have, and i've listened to them both in public and in private hearings. i haven't heard of a single case that couldn't have been captured or investigated with a traditional judicial warrant and looking at the phone calls of a suspect. to my knowledge, and i'm a bit at a disadvantage because they have all the secret knowledge and i don't have it but to my knowledge none of the people captured or prevented were traced from random numbers. they were traced from a suspect. so you have a suspect who makes phone calls. i'm all for looking at a suspect's phone calls with a judge's warrant and then the next person you look at their phone calls. my understanding is they like looking at all american phone records because they think it's easier and faster.
that's why i heard from them. easier and faster but not that they couldn't have done this with a regular traditional judicial warrant. senator, i want to make sure i wasn't misunderstanding you. you said the head of the nsa was guilty of an outright law. are you saying the general and other officials are liars? >> what i'm saying is that the director of national intelligence in march did directly lie to congress which is against the law. he said that they were not collecting any data on american citizens. >> you're talking about james clapper. >> and it turns out they're collecting billions of data on phone calls every day. it was a lie. what i'm saying is by lying to congress which is against the law he severely damaged the credibility of the entire intelligence committee. >> what should be done about that? i mean, i know that mr. clapper went on another network and said
that his response, and i know what you're talking about. senator ron wyden's statement. mr. clapper went on the andrea mitchell program and said it was the least truthful answer he could give. i'm guessing you're saying that is not satisfactory. should the president ask for his resignation? >> i can't imagine how you regain your credibility when you lie, come in front of the senate, and a senator asks you a direct question, which by the way he was warned of, according to senator wyden's office, they called the director of national intelligence and said, we are going to ask you this question. so even though he was told in advance he would get the question, he still lied in a public hearing. i think there needs to be an open debate and americans need to decide are you willing to give up the data on all of your phone calls every day all the time because of your fear for terrorism or do you think like i do that you can catch terrorists
and have the bill of rights at the same time? i think you can have both. >> so should mr. clapper resign do you think? >> the president has to decide that. i don't get a choice to decide. >> if you were president would you ask for a resignation? >> yes. he would not work in my administration because the thing is we have to be able to trust our officials and when do you this, you have the ability to completely destroy people's lives, the ability to actually kill people overseas. i would think that you really have to have the utmost trust and i think he's lost our trust by lying to us. >> you're obviously laying the ground work for a presidential run, senator paul. how do you plan on capturing your party's nomination when your views on some of these issues are at odds with people like dick cheney and some of the hawks in your party on surveillance? >> you know, there was a poll out just this week that said well over 60% of republicans think the nsa has gone too far.
that they think your private phone calls and your records you should have to have a warrant. so i think unless we have a fuller debate on these discussions you'll find not only republicans are with me on this issue, the youth are. president obama lost 20 points among the young voters in the last month and the reason he did so is they see him now as a hypocrite who is unwilling to defend the privacy of the internet. i think issues like this resonate beyond the republican label and i think they'll help us become a bigger national party and republicans will find out that i will and i do say that we do everything we can to protect our country consistent with our constitution. that's what we're defending. >> i just wanted to ask you, "the washington post" came out with an item today, described you as the most interesting man in the political world. i don't know if you -- you are held up with the most interesting man in the world and "the new republic" described you as president rand paul not being very subtle there.
you are running for president, right? >> well, you know, i think those are compliments but i think that i try to be genuine and honest and as a physician i look at things, i see problems in our country and i want to fix them regardless of whether it's a republican or democrat label, who is supporting them. whether or not what i do in the future, we're about a year away from making a decision but i want to help the republican party grow and be more inclusive of people of all races, all walks of life, with tatoos, without tatoos. i want everybody to think they have a place in our party. so i am trying to make the party bigger. >> all right. very good. thanks very much senator rand paul for your time. we appreciate it. >> thank you. >> in a minute find out why wolf is front and center in an italian newspaper. it's very well deserved. ( bell rings ) they remind me so much of my grandkids.
wish i saw mine more often, but they live so far away. i've been thinking about moving in with my daughter and her family. it's been pretty tough since jack passed away. it's a good thing you had life insurance through the colonial penn program. you're right. it was affordable, and we were guaranteed acceptance. guaranteed acceptance? it means you can't be turned down because of your health. you don't have to take a physical or answer any health questions. they don't care about your aches and pains. well, how do you know? did you speak to alex trebek? because i have a policy myself. it costs just $9.95 a month per unit. it's perfect for my budget. my rate will never go up.
and my coverage will never go down because of my age. affordable coverage and guaranteed acceptance? we should give them a call. do you want to help protect your loved ones from the burden of final expenses? if you're between 50 and 85, you can get quality insurance that does not require any health questions or a medical exam. your rate of $9.95 a month per unit will never increase, and your coverage will never decrease -- that's guaranteed. so join the six million people who have already called about this insurance. whether you're getting new insurance or supplementing what you already have, call now and ask one of their representatives about a plan that meets your needs. so, what are you waiting for? go call now! we'll finish up here.
...and we inspected his brakes for free. -free is good. -free is very good. [ male announcer ] now get 50% off brake pads and shoes at meineke. take a look at this. our wolf blitzer is honored with the urbino press award which italy gives each year to a distinguished american journalist. hundreds of people were on hand this week to watch the ceremony which included a procession. there is wolf right there. through the town of urbino. past recipients including david ignatious of "the washington post" and pulitzer prize winner tom freeman of the "new york times." wolf gave a speech about his career and world events and this
is just very well deserved. we're very proud of our wolf blitzer. congratulations. i'm jim acosta in "the situation room." the news continues next on cnn. welcome everyone. i promise you you're going to enjoy this hour of news. you're going to get the news here on cnn this hour but i ask that you sit down and i want you to watch without distraction especially the first half hour of this program. we're going to discuss what's garnering the attention of most of the country right now and that is celebrity chef paula deen accused of being a racist. can she recover from it? can anyone in her position recover from it? she is a million dollar empire, $20 million empire. but as you and i know this story goes far beyond paula