tv State of the Union With Candy Crowley CNN October 26, 2014 6:00am-7:01am PDT
competitive into the final stretch. republicans trying to get over 40, closer to 250, now spending late in massachusetts in the sixth congressional district in florida and the 26th, yes, the senate gets most of the attention but some fun house chess to play as well. that's it for "inside politics." thanks thanks for sharing your sunday morning. "state of the union" with candy crowley starts now. after a manhattan doctor from new guinea returns from illinois, new york, new jersey and illinois trump federal regulations with their own regulations. today dr. tony fauci on whether the states are on to something the feds should have been and an exclusive with the chair of a key house committee who blasts the central government response as bumbling. >> i think we all know that the system is not yet refined to to where we can cosay it's working
properly. this week's focus on the lone wolf, the internet and isis. >> their propaganda is having some effect. >> an interview with dianne feinstein. plus tick tock, nine shopping days left 'til the elections and fear is selling. republican and democratic party chairs reince priebus and debbie wasserman schultz join us. then our political round table gives us predictions for mid terms 2014. this is "state of the union." good morning from washington, i'm candy crowley. new york, new jersey and illinois abruptly imposed mandatory 21-day quarantines on all health care workers returning from west africa. the first person to be quarn to an end a nurse wrote in "the dallas morning news" of her concern for workers returning to
the u.s. "i am scared like me they will arrive and see a frenzy of disorganization, fear and most frightening quarantine." here joining me dr. tony fauci, long time director of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases. you let go one of the nurses from dallas this week. >> right. >> cured of ebola, so i no know that's a big relief to you. >> inteed. >> we have a doctor quarantined up in had new york and that apparently is what prompted these new rules from new york, from illinois, and from new jersey. what do you think of them? >> well, i think there are two principles we need to stick with, one, protecting the american people is paramount but to do that -- >> they did agree with you on that. >> you have got to make your decisions and policy based on the scientific data, which tells us people who are not ill, who don't have symptoms with whom you don't come into contact with body fluids they north a threat, they are not going to spread it.
we have to be careful when we make policy we don't have unintended consequences where you group everyone in the same category, that just because you came back from there, that therefore you're in this category. we do have stratification of risk and stratification of monitoring. that's critical, based on scientific data. i'm concerned of the disincentive for the health care workers and it's interesting i think people lose that the best way to protect us is to stop it in africa and one of the best ways to stop it in africa is to get health workers who are going there and helping them with their problem. when they come back, they need to be treated in a way that doesn't disincentivize them from going there. >> this nurse sounded she was surprised by this as is everybody else. worker goes to africa, deals with ebola patients knows when they come back they'll be in a 21-day quarantine. >> right. >> what is the harm with that? >> the harm it is totally disruptive of their life.
even if you put a person no risk to everyone else. >> but so is going to west africa to treat ebola patients one would think. >> we want them to go. they help protect america by going over there. people need to understand the scientific evidence tells you you're not going to transmit it. we don't want to be cavalier, candy. there are ways of monitoring people, there's passive monitoring, there's active monitoring. >> there is monitoring now at the airport. >> yes, but i'm talking about when they come home and they're in their home, if, in fact, they're at a certain risk they will then be actively monday to ared in the sense of somebody taking your temperature, asking you if you have symptoms. there's a big, big difference between completely confining somebody that they can't even get outside and doing the appropriate monitoring based on scientific evidence. >> but this is based i think on a doctor who came back, had been treating patients in guinea. he comes home and fine for four, five, six, seven days, begins to
feel tired. the night before he comes down with a fever he's out bowling and eating and doing ordinary things and obviously gets a fever, they come get him. you would eliminate a lot of that, you would not be worried about his fiance, you would not be worried about the bowling alley. the new york governor would not have to walk down the streets to prove everything is just fine in the subways if it you had, say look, a doctor, you've been treating ebola patients, time for to you take 21 days off. >> there are monitoring guide lines that tell you how you can do that and accomplish the same goal. for example, the monitoring would have picked up at the time he got symptoms and a temperature. before that, he was not ineffective to anyoinfec infective to everyone. you want to be completely 100% free from everything. when do you that you might have the unintended consequence of people not wanting to go over there and if that's the case, they're not going to do very well if they don't have doctors
and nurses that are helping them. >> so to you the primary reason here would be that you are discouraging health care workers from going and stopping this where it would count. >> right. >> i want to read you something governor chris christie of new jersey, one of those who joined in this mandatory isolation and quarantine for health care workers "i am sorry" speaking of nurse "i'm sorry if in any way she was inconvenienced but inconvenience that could occur from having folks that are symptomatic and ill out amongst the public is a much, much greater concern of mine." so certainly nothing was done spengsally to try to inconvenience her or try to make her uncop fortable." >> the key word symptomatic and ill, she was not. that's the thing we have to keep emphasizing the scientific data tells you if you are not ill, if you don't have symptoms, if someone doesn't come into contact with your body fluids, diarrhea, vomit, they're not infective. >> people don't believe the federal doctors or the federal government on any of this.
>> that could be the case trying hard to get people to understand why the scientific data is the thing that should drive our policy, drive our decisions. there's not a cavalier attitude. our first goal is to protect the american people, but you want to do it in a way that has a scientific basis to it. >> i guess the question is, as you know, it is widely perceived that the beginning of this, at the dallas hospital and the cdc and what americans felt they were told about all of this got botched. >> right. >> and now the states certainly three governors don't trust that the guidelines are tough enough, that really will keep the folks in their state safe. >> right, well first of all, we could go reexamine the early part that was difficult. obviously there were some missteps there but again, you don't want to make a blanket change in something that might have negative consequences. you want to continue to make the safety of the american public paramount but it is critically important that you do that based on scientific evidence and data,
and it tells us who can transmit and who can't. >> another governor, florida governor rick scott has said that starting from now, he wants to have, to put folks that have come from west africa, be they health care workers or otherwise in the three affected countries at this point into 21-day health evaluations with his department of health. so twice daily they would take part in these health evaluations. >> right. >> here's what he said when he put out this at the same time, "we have asked the cdc to identify the risk levels of all returning individuals from these areas" moving into florida, "but they have not provided that information. therefore, we are moving quickly to require the four individuals who have returned to florida already and anyone in the future who will return to florida from an ebola area to take part in twice daily 21-day health evaluations. "anything wrong with that?
>> again -- >> see it's a in tmistrust of t cdc. >> that's unfortunate. the fact is there are different levels of risk, there's high risk, and minimum risk. you have to look at it in a stratified way. someone is high risk you want to be more aggressive. some but not zero risk, low risk but not zero risk and no risk. all of those things have to be taken into consideration. you want to make sure that you understand that you don't want to have negative consequences, but you have to underscore the first principle is to protect the american people so don't let anybody get the idea that that's not a concern. we're only concerned about the convenience of health care workers, that's not the case. first principle is always protect the american people. >> right now can you tell the american people, with he should say you're the person the administration wanted to have come talk about this. >> right. >> can awe sure the american
people that absolutely everything is in place. >> right. >> that will keep them safe? >> it's a dynamic process, and you can continue to reevaluate and you make changes in fine tuning. it would be foolish to say to anyone under any circumstances that everything is absolutely perfect. the government, the cdc, the administration continually finetune answer makes sure we're doing it right. we want to get it right. that doesn't mean from the get-go, it's 100% right, but you want to keep going there. >> if you're the person that gets the ebola virus, hopefully you get it right, it's kind of -- >> look at the evidence. who has gotten infected outside of the health care setting? the two people, one of woman i took care of, got infected because she put herself in harm's way of a patient with advanced disease. you've got to keep looking at the facts, not what the what if, what if, what if. if you do that scenario, you can have any situation that you could create in your mind. >> what about a travel ban? >> again --
>> same thing? >> well, what you need to do with the travel ban, you got to look at what the possible negative consequences are, and what is the issue that you're trying to address. >> again your concern is that we treat this in west africa. >> right, get it settled in west, the best way over and over again, the best way to protect american people is to stop the epidemic in west africa. >> tell me as honestly as you can, is there something that is not in place that you believe should be in place? >> well, i think that as we continue to gain more experience, i don't think that there's something egregiously out of place, that should be in place, but you continue to every single day take a look at where we're going, is there something that needs to be changed? i think the american people need to understand that this isn't something okay check this box and walk away. every single day you continue to make sure you're doing the best to protect the american people. >> dr. tony fauci thank you so much for coming by. this is getting to be a habit with us now. as soon as we lick this thing you have some time off. >> indeed.
thank you, candy. this week the president took more steps to deal with ebola, but are they good enough? the outspoken chairman of the house oversight committee joins me next. about 55. where you headed at such an appropriate speed? across the country to enhance the nation's most reliable 4g lte network. how's it working for ya? better than ever. how'd you do it? added cell sites. increased capacity. and your point is... so you can download music, games, and directions for the road when you need them. who's this guy? oh that's charlie. you ever put pepper spray on your burrito? i like it spicy but not like uggggh spicy. he always like this? you have no idea. at&t. the nation's most reliable 4g lte network. what does an apron have to do with car insurance? an apron is hard work. an apron is pride in what you do. an apron is not quitting until you've made something a little better.
what does an apron have to do with car insurance? for us, everything. [ female announcer ] we love our smartphones. and now telcos using hp big data solutions are feeling the love, too. by offering things like on-the-spot data upgrades -- an idea that reduced overcharge complaints by 98%. no matter how fast your business needs to adapt, if hp big data solutions can keep wireless customers smiling, imagine what they can do for yours. make it matter. and cialis for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment is right. cialis is also the only daily ed tablet approved to treat symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess.
side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any allergic reactions like rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a free 30-tablet trial. ♪ [ male announcer ] united is rolling out global, satellite-fed wi-fi to connect you even 35,000 feet over the ocean. ♪ that's...wifi friendly. ♪
visit tripadvisor rome.ndly. with millions of reviews, tripadvisor makes any destination better. so visit tripadvisor.com now. what more does the president have to do to keep ebola out of the u.s.? in the past week the administration announced additional screening for travelers coming from west africa, requiring them to self-report their temperatures and symptoms to state and local health departments. the president's new ebola czar
started work ogen a "seamless response plan" and the cdc continuing examining and refining procedures and protocols for degree with ebola. with me now congressman darrell issa. let's talk first about the first three states that have imposed mandatory isolation for health care workers who have dealt with ebola in west africa. we now have one nurse under the new rule in new jersey who is in isolation in a hospital. what do you think of it? >> i think governors of both parties are reacting to an absence of leadership and absence of belief that the federal government really does know what they're doing. these missteps and some of them brought out by the energy and commerce committee hearing and some by ours and others really do concern people that it's a 35-year-old disease. if you don't know now how to fight ebola, why are you changing protocols after 35
years and after we're told that the only way to get it is to preach protocol if you are auy' nurse. >> i'm not a doctor so i won't play one on tv. >> nor am i. >> their experience with ebola has not been in a modern medical setting and there were mistakes made coming into it. >> but candy, modern facilities are inherently better than where we've been fighting it in africa. they're saying in africa, we know how to beat this. the fact is, the nurses who in some cases were not fully covered when somebody threw up on them, you go how could the protocol have to be changed, just a few days ago. >> in africa i'm told a lot of it has to do with inserting iv fluids and less about dealing because they have so many cases that are dying, more about dehydration than about most other things. say i have two non-doctors forget the conversation for a moment.
i'm not sure you answered the question. the question is, we understand why the governors may have done it. is it a good idea? >> science has told us if we are to take them at their word that if somebody does not have an elevated temperature or the other later symptoms, that we can rely on them not being contagious. if that's true, then immediate isolation of people for 21 days is not the answer. again, trust matters. if we had begun this process by saying you have to monitor people continuously coming into this country for ten days, now we think it's 11 or 12, and know whether their temperature rises to know if they were exposed and we're doing that, then i think the public would have confidence but in this case we didn't do that, we had mr. duncan come in with elevated temperature. we weren't checking it and now we're playing catchup. the important thing is, we need to agree that we made mistakes. government needs to have a plan,
and some of the plans are pretty straightforward. when i was coming in, i looked and i said, you know how many apps arou s are on the iphone t can monitor your temperature continuously? we need to ask how are we going to have everyone coming into the country who may have had contact, how are we going to make it easy, predictable and verifiable that we're knowing their temperatures for those next "x" amount of days? if we do that then we have a monitoring system that can prevent this kind of individual action by the states. if we don't do that, then the american people are asking their governors to protect them. >> so if i understand you correctly, you don't think that this was a good idea, that you do understand why the governors may have reacted. i want to read you something that the mayor of new york -- >> our hearing indicated from the people we had that it wasn't a good idea. democrats and republicans pushed back and said yes, but you've said these things and now you're not credible. that was the problem we saw in
our hearing. obviously the energy and commerce committee saw changes after they held their hearing that showed that the protocols were not yet accurate, so again, this is about public confidence, the way you restore public confidence is first you have leadership, then you admit -- >> the president's done a lot of things -- >> he appointed a lawyer, if this was an election problem i would be a little less worried. the fact is, i'd much rather he find a four-star general or admiral to coordinate these people who said things that turned out to be inaccurate, made mistakes and don't want to admit them. the doctor you had on he's still playing we didn't make any mistakes. >> he said there were problems and there were mistakes going in, but i mean he did say that, dr. fauci. >> they were so sure they were right and now people are dead, people are infected and governors of both parties are reacting because there isn't a trust in the leadership of this administration. getting that back is doable.
it's our responsibility to do it, but it's also our responsibility now to second-guess at our level the things that are said to us to make sure the american people do have watchdogs. >> i want to play you something that the mayor of new york said, he did not know that this isolation regulation was going to be put into effect in new york and here's what he had to say. >> these individuals who are going there to serve are the people who will end this crisis. we can't have the illusion that we can turn away from it and someday it may end. if we took that attitude, if nations around the world took that attitude this would be a truly devastating global crisis. >> it's the same point that dr. fauci made, that we can't discourage workers from going there, because where this stops is in west africa. would you agree with that? >> absolutely. the fact is that we've got to beat it at its source, just as we have, and i use this analysis or analogy in my hearing, just as the global war on terror is
fighting isil outside of baghdad, outside of erbil and so on, you have to go on to where this is. at the same time, the american people want to know that our 3,000 or so military personnel are being properly protected, that we're watching for them and that we have a plan for the inevitability that one or more of them will become infected and we've got to protect them. >> congressman, it's a final question. you know that we were in the middle of midterms, one of the major -- >> heard a rumor. >> you heard that rumor. one of the major themes of republicans has been, this president mishandling isis, mishandling ebola, sort of that fear theme. so how do you help bring confidence, which you say the american people need in a system, and these are doctors, these are not politicians that came out here and said these things that later proved might not have been exactly right, so how do i not look at your
hearing, how do i not look at the continuing criticism of the president, who you say he was late to the game but he's now trying to, you know, put some procedures in place, how do we not look at that through a political prism and say this just fits right in to the republican talking points. >> my ranking member, mr. cummings, and i asked for a hearing because we needed to get the transparency and make it available to the american people. that's the beginning of the fix. if this administration opens up, which has not been their way of doing business and they make witnesses available and they allow the information to be made available to congress and congress then makes a decision with the president that we're doing the right things, then confidence is restored. that's what we're doing with the war if you will, the battle against isil, where now there's an engagement and members of congress and others like myself are going over to see how things are going. the american people expect their congressmen to in fact be part
of that process, to come home, even during elections and say they made mistakes, but they are getting it right or they're getting closer to having it right and we will look other their shoulder and make sure they get it right on behalf of the american people. i think that's what we're doing and i think considering we're only a few days away from an election, we're doing it at an incredibly not partisan basis by all the committees. >> just quickly, would you call on the governors of new jersey a republican new york, a democrat illinois, a democrat and say stop, this isn't necessary, it's confusing. you may discourage workers, would you tell them it's not a good idea and be done with it? >> certainly it's a good idea to monitor temperatures of people coming here from that region. >> but put them in isolation, would you tell them to stop that? >> they have to have a viable alternative that they can field. as i said if they have the ability to monitor for 21 days as science is telling us, the temperatures of these individuals, so that the moment it spiked, they could go and bring these people into
isolation, then i'm sure they would look to that. >> that's exactly what happened in new york. with the doctor. >> no, actually it didn't happen until a while afterwards and when they go around and they disinfect places he's been, that says they didn't catch it quickly. again, continuous monitoring, so that you can quickly put these people in, could be an alternative, but that's the leadership at the top. the governors are asking the white house and the administration to give them answers, if they give them answers that are better than what they're doing, then these governors i believe will do it. until that time they're doing what they think is right. >> i got to run, congressman darrell issa thanks for coming by, appreciate it. next up the head of the senate intelligence committee joins us to talk about the danger of lone wolves, both cracking them and stopping them. [ male announcer ] it's a warning. a wake-up call. but it's not happening out there. it's happening in here. [ sirens wailing ] inside of you.
even if you're treating your crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, an occasional flare may be a sign of damaging inflammation. learn more about the role damaging inflammation may be playing in your symptoms with the expert advice tool at crohnsandcolitis.com. and then speak with your gastroenterologist.
with the expert advice tool at crohnsandcolitis.com. (receptionist) gunderman group is growing. getting in a groove. growth is gratifying. goal is to grow. gotta get greater growth. i just talked to ups. they got expert advise, special discounts, new technologies. like smart pick ups. they'll only show up when you print a label and it's automatic. we save time and money. time? money? time and money. awesome. awesome! awesome! awesome! awesome! (all) awesome! i love logistics.
even develop a customized energy plan for your company. think of it as a way to take more control over your operating costs. and yet another energy saving opportunity from pg&e. find new ways to save energy and money with pg&e's business energy check-up. it's a fresh approach on education-- superintendent of public instruction tom torlakson's blueprint for great schools. torlakson's blueprint outlines how investing in our schools will reduce class sizes, bring back music and art, and provide a well-rounded education. and torlakson's plan calls for more parental involvement. spending decisions about our education dollars should be made by parents and teachers, not by politicians. tell tom torlakson to keep fighting for a plan that invests in our public schools. i want to bring in senator
dianne feinstein, the democratic woman, chairman of the senate intelligence committee. thank you for joining us. >> you're welcome. >> when you see in a single week we saw what happened in canada when a single gunman kills a soldier, we see a hatchet attack, of all things, on police officers in queens. both men seemed to have some affinity for, inspired by somehow violent jihad. you add in a woman in moore, oklahoma, who was beheaded by a disgruntled worker who had recently "converted to islam." you have the attacks in ft. hood. you have the boston marathon bombers who went online and seemed somewhat inspired by violent jihad. is this one big problem or is it separate problems? >> oh, i think it's one big problem. i think one of the problems is that the internet as well as
certain specific muslim extremists are really firing up this lone wolf phenomenon, and these attacks and the multiplicity of attacks in 2014 show that their propaganda is having some effect. my view of isis is, i think people do not see the evil and the vicious side of it. i don't see, think they see the beheadings of children -- >> yes, they're on, they do see beheadings, they're online shoot soldiers in a ditch, beheading journalists and others. >> i saw this, but essentially, i mean, for anyone that has any kind of value of a just system, isis doesn't make that case. isis is essentially a fighting force of 30,000 to 50,000 people, sophisticated with
commanders, with some heavy weapons, and they are on a march now, and they are going to slay everything in their way. >> in the propaganda wars it does seem that isis is quite sophisticated so let me, i want to talk to you about that and how to fight that but i if, want to ask you about these lone wolves which basically show many of these attacks have been. and by definition, there's no known tie to a terrorist, direct tie to a terrorist organization of any sort. they're kind of one person cells at this point. what is the defense against that, senator? >> well the only defense is intelligence, and that is that you have to ferret it out. you have to be able to watch it, and you have to be able to disrupt them. now, this is hard to do, because it takes technical means, and americans don't necessarily like technical means. >> right, or spying is the
definition of technical means. >> well, that's right, and this in the united states, this falls under the jurisdiction of the fbi, not the cia, and i've been briefed by director comey, and i believe the fbi is making every effort to stay on top of this lone wolf phenomenon. i think the white house is cognizant of it and is working very hard to see that we have the ability to be able to find them and stop them. >> in the muslim community, the peaceful muz lslim community th would tell you in the u.s. that they feel some of the outreach that's being done by the feds, by the homeland security department and others feels like what the u.s. really wants is for the muslim community to become their spies within their community in the u.s. and that is offputting, when they do feel targeted because of their religi religion, how do you bridge that? >> let me say this. the muslim community is a part of america, and as such, it has
all of the protections of any community in america, and one of america's goals has been to integrate an immigrant community into our society and see that they have opportunity, that they're able to be productive, able to live without any kind of harassment and there are very few countries in the world that actually do that, united states does it. >> let me ask you, because i know that you lost two deputy sheriffs in sacramento over the weekend. >> yes. >> but we've also seen, and that does not seem, that seems like to be street crime as opposed to anything that's related to terrorism, but do you feel, looking at what we've seen on the internet, some of the appeals from isis, that folks in police uniforms, that folks in soldiers uniform, whether in canada or the u, are now under
an even bigger threat than their jobs would lead to you believe? >> i believe that to be true. i believe word has gone out into these communities that a strike target would be somebody in uniform, whether it is police or whether it's military, and i think you're correct in that assessment. >> and what's to be done about that? >> well, what's to be done about it is, i think the police and military have to be on guard. i think this is very difficult. i think halls of government have to be on guard the way the parliament and canada was penetrated. in canada, you had an armed sergeant-at-arms who took action and killed the perpetrator, and i think we need to think in some new ways. i don't particularly want to discuss it on television, but one thing's for sure, we are going to protect our
institutions of government. >> and i cannot let you go, senator, without asking about an article i read that posited that michelle obama would like to run for the senate in california, and that she has her eye on your seat in 2018 because the feeling is that you may retire at that point, and so i thought i'd get your reaction to that story. >> oh, did you? well, i have no idea what i'm going to be doing in 2018. that's four years from now, and that's one of the nice things of a six-year term. i've served two years of my term and you know, i'll make a decision in due time. i'm flattered, if that should be true. somehow i do not believe it is true, but i would be flattered if it were. >> senator dianne feinstein, i don't know what i'm going to be doing in 2018 either. >> good. >> but i appreciate your being here. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. oh, you're welcome. go giants. >> oh, go royals. >> i got it in.
i got it in. next, the fear factor, we'll ask the chairs of both political parties if the election is about anything other than what or who scares you the most. (woman) the constipation and belly pain feel like a knot. how can i ease this pain? (man) when i can't go, it's like bricks piling up. i wish i could find some relief. (announcer) ask your doctor about linzess-- a once-daily capsule for adults with ibs with constipation or chronic idiopathic constipation. linzess is thought to help calm pain-sensing nerves and accelerate bowel movements. it helps you proactively manage your symptoms. do not give linzess to children under 6, and it should not be given to children 6 to 17. it may harm them. don't take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain especially with bloody or black stools the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away.
other side effects include gas, stomach-area pain and swelling. bottom line, ask your doctor about linzess today. isis gaining ground, terrorists committing mass murder. ebola inside the u.s. americans alarmed about national security, what's president obama doing? making plans to bring terrorists from guantanamo to our country. >> state after state, people are doing all they can to scare you, not because it it's almost halloween, it's because it's almost election day. so what is this election about? joining us now, congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz, chair of the democratic national committee and her counterpart, reince priebus, chair of the national republican committee. thank you both for joining us. >> thank you, candy. >> you're welcome. >> how is this not a wild scare tactic?
this is like ebola, isis, they're all coming to get you and it's at president's fault. is that your theme? >> no, i think people are scared though. i think national security whether it be overseas, whether it be the economy, the bordebor. here's the thing, i think ultimately what this election has got do with bad management, mismanagement, the lack of management, managers that can't manage and the president's at the head of all of this. i mean, the question really is, the president's policies. it's not really the president, but the president's made it very clear this past week, and i think i will be interested in what debbie has to say about this, but is the president's policies on the ballot, and i think they are on the balloball. that's one question. the second question should we pass a budget in this country, should we pass one of 350 bills sitting on harry reid's desk? yes, it is about the president and yes it's about his policies but the democrats don't want to
admit that the president's policies ory ies are on the bal. >> congresswoman is this election about president obama's policies. >> this election is about making sure that we elect a congress that will focus on the priorities that people care about the most, and that's creating jobs, getting this committee turned around, investing in education and health care, making sure that we can focus on a foreign policy that keeps people safe from harm. candy, i represent 750,000 people in the united states congress. my number one priority is to make sure that we can help kick this committee into even higher gear domestically and keep people safe, and so i agree with darrell issa, my colleague -- >> the question is the president's policy -- >> no, no, reince, i let you finish. debris with darrell issa and what darrell issa said about the ebola crisis is that we need to make sure that we recognize that
we have to keep our people safe, and we have to have policies that make sure that we can do that by not overreacting. >> candy, you -- >> so when we're -- excuse me. so making sure that we have a balanced rational policy where there's not overreaction, where we can keep people safe and make sure that we can eradicate ebola in the countries where people are coming from is important, and let me say what's on the ballot is our domestic policy that we need to have a congress that has people's back, keeps people from harm and the republicans are focused on extremism -- >> let me pick up the extremism for one thing and give you a shot at this, because the word extremism is used fairly liberally in a lot of ads that we're seeing against -- well, candy -- >> let me pop in here, congresswoman, for one second. i want to play you something. this is an ad not from you all but from your democrat counterparts in the senate and
this is against colorado senate candidate cory gardner, about his stance on abortion. i want to play a brief clip. >> gardner wants to ban abortions even in cases of rape and incest. >> that's extreme. >> gardner is sponsoring a bill to ban all abortions right now. >> cory gardner is wrong. >> cory gardner is way too extreme for colorado. >> so we've heard this in previous elections, too extreme, too extreme, tea party, we can't work with them, so it seems that the democrats overall message is yes, ice sis scary, yes, ebola's scary but republicans are a lot scarier. >> well, that's right. cory gardner is a sponsor of a bill that would prevent women from being able to get access to make their own reproductive choices even if if the case of rape or incest. >> okay, now hang on a second. >> the last thing we did before we left for the recess was vote to sue the president for doing his job. when the republicans won't even do their job.
they won't work with us. >> debbie still hasn't answered the question. first of all she still hasn't answered the question as to whether or not -- >> hang on one second. -- >> -- the president's policies are on the ballot. >> reince what's on the ballot are democratic and republican candidates. >>:o, well -- >> hang on one second. congresswoman, tell us what this election is about, what's on the ballot, are they the president's policies? >> are they the president's policies or not, are the president's policies on the ballot? >> maybe you can let candy ask me the questions rather than you. >> she's been doing a great job of it so far. you haven't been answering them, though >> so what's on the ballot is a choice for voters between democrats, who are running for congress, and i'm one of them, that's running for congress that's focused on creating jobs, on making sure that we can help people reach the middle class, by focusing on investing in education and health care, and infrastructure and the choice between republican candidates who support a tea party agenda,
who do like cory gardner, cosponsor legislation that prevents women from making their own reproductive choices even if the case of rape or incest, that sues the president for doing his job, that shuts the government down. >> this is like a ten-minute commercial here. >> that's the choice. no, what it is is reality, the reality that voters face in the next nine days, reince. >> here's the deal -- >> republicans who put ex-screamism at the top of the agenda. >> this is a one-sided conversation. >> hang on one second congresswoman. >> in diagnosis the venner have post" and the union leader" said the democrats are beclowning themselves with this operation talking about putting teenagers in jail. what about the fact that charlie crist it was discovered the other day has been taking thousands of dollars from strip club owners in florida. is debbie going to call out charlie crist on that? >> oh my gosh, you are unbelievable. rick scott. >> what about the governor of
new mexico that debbie defended. >> candy let's talk about the florida -- >> hang on one second. >> because a person that was accused of beating up his wife, this person was accused of ransacking his other wife's home. and what does she do, she defends these people. she defends them and then talks about this -- >> my turn, candy. >> this isn't possible because i can't even hear what's going on. this is ridiculous. >> i'll give you 30 seconds. wait one second, congresswoman. i've got 30 seconds for each of you and then i want to ask you something. i understand what you all are talking about here, reince is talking about you all say the republicans have a war on women and he's pointing out some things that republicans find objectionable. >> no, women are worse off today than ever been under this president. >> let me ask the question. >> see, reince just wants this to be a monologue because they don't have anyish use. >> -- what voters want them to
talk about. >> a monologue, the monologue is coming from south florida. >> rick scott at the other debate admitted he delayed an execution of an inmate on death row because he wanted to make sure that pam bondi, our attorney general could attend a fund-raiser. that is the type of decision rick scott has disqualified himself from being gchb of this state. >> congresswoman, i have to -- >> you have republicans who don't take care of the priorities that people care about which is jobs and the economy and what this election is going to turn on. >> debbie still hasn't answered the question whether the president's policies are on the ballot. yes or no? are the president's policies on the ballot? >> jobs and the economy are on the ballot versus your candidates which are focused on extremism. >> we'll continue this throughout the break and i'll let you know who wins. coming up a brand new set of
predictions straight from the guy crunching the numbers, we'll ask our political panel what else they're seeing in their crystal ball. at t-mobile you can hook up the whole family for $100 bucks. get 4 lines with unlimited talk and text and up to 10 gigabytes of 4g lte data. plus get the brand-new samsung galaxy note 4 for $0 down. no question about that. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your
medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any allergic reactions like rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a free 30-tablet trial. (receptionist) gunderman group is growing. getting in a groove. growth is gratifying. goal is to grow. gotta get greater growth. i just talked to ups. they got expert advise, special discounts, new technologies. like smart pick ups. they'll only show up when you print a label and it's automatic. we save time and money. time? money? time and money. awesome. awesome! awesome! awesome! awesome!
we are nine days from what was once predicted to be alt least by some a republican wave election. is it down to ripples? joining me, newt gingrich and stephanie cutter along with sam wong. and a.b. stoddard. so first, i want to start with you, sam. because you've made quite a bit of news about predicting pretty heavy odds that democrats would win the senate. where are you now on the senate race and who will come out on top? >> thanks, candy. as a scientist, i use the same lab methods to analyze senate and governor races and the democrats were running slightly ahead of expectations all summer. they dipped in september, and right now, it's where it was in june, which is where democrats and republicans to take 49, 50, or 51 seats which puts us on the knife edge. it could go either way.
>> you see it as 50/50? >> absolutely. >> and governors always seen as a big democratic plus in this election year, where on the governors race? >> both governors and senate races are more close races, races within three points, more governor and senate seats than the last two midterms put together. it's a super suspenseful year. republican governors and democratic senators have it on the line. >> the deed. so tell me on the ground, because we just heard the two, how is this playing out now? i think we have felt that things were always close before an election, but this was a close election. what does it feel like in the reporting of a specific race? >> what we saw in 2006 and 2008 were huge, and 2010, were huge movements. 1994. we have experienced huge power shifts. the electorate can't find something that they feel will make things better. they can't find change. they're disgusted with both sides. they're not motivated to vote.
that's why we're on the knife's edge because there's not a clear answer for a very anxious electorate on either side. >> there doesn't appear to be a clear theme. >> i think democrats and republicans have different themes, which is typical in a close election. democrats, at least in the senate campaigns, are really talking about local issues. and the differences between the two candidates in terms of their age agendas. you see that in north carolina, one of the big reason s kay hagn is repeatedly ahead of her opponent, because she's focusing on the issues important to carolinians. for the republicans, they want to make it as much about president obama as possible. the what we did in 2006 when we took back the house and senate from republicans. but it doesn't seem to be working. i think public opinion is set in on president obama, but they're not giving voters anything additional to vote on in terms
of appealing to an electorate. >> what i find in elections is generally the party that is worried that they're going to lose, say it's all about local elections and what's going on there. part of it looks to be winning, says no, there's a national wave here that's coming. which is it? >> well, look, i think first of all, you can tell which party is nationally on defense because the party is talking about local elections. second, i think the real question and this will decide whether it's a close race or not, is turnout. if you can look very, very good, and '98, there were certain districts where the clintons did a brilliant job of targeting african-americans and on election night, we had turnouts that were presidential level, and we lost seats we didn't even think were in contention. kept the house but lost seats. you look at a state like wisconsin. i don't think 3% of the state is available to either party. i think wisconsin is frozen. it's frozen at about 48/48, but
the question is, do both 48s turn out equally? >> you're talking about the governor's race? >> governor, or does it turn out differently because walker and burke are polarized, but can burke turn out the two counties she has to have. >> the rule of thumb, any race that is within two points could go either way. there are so many races on the line. >> i think you're safe to say that nobody today knows what the final outcome is going to be, and in that sense, you don't know. i can also tell you, 1994, on monday night before the election, there was not a single national correspondent who thought we would win the house. because it was inconceivable. this race could be the democrats' come back miraculously. they could lose every one of these close races. >> in 1994, the republicans picked up 11 governorships. this year, it looks like maybe
no change. >> to his point, before the '94 election, we did see signs of a wave. and maybe people didn't think it was going to result in taking over the house, but there were a lot more clear signs about republican victories than there are now. if you look, you know, both of you had said that the party on defense talks about local issues. well, the party on defense, you're talking about the democrats, they're actually in the face of historical headwinds, every historical data point working against them, are either winning or holding their own in these states. so talking ability local issues seems to be what voters are looking for. >> a.b., tell me where -- i'm going to ask all of you this. where am i going to be surprised election night? >> well, i think some of the surprises could come from turnouts in states where the governors races are closely contested or favoring a democrat. so that's going to help some of the senate races. that could help in georgia, that
could help in kansas. that could help in colorado. that's the kind of thing -- those are the surprises i'm looking for. i think that the states colorado, iowa, arkansas, montana, west virginia, alaska, and pretty much louisiana, that look gone. i agree with sam, we could be surprised by 3% to 5% point swings, but i think there's going to be surprises, newt is right, about which ground game actually gets people out. and romney's pollster has a great line about waking up the morning after the election in 2012 where he learned a low propensity, low enthusiasm voter is still a vote that counts as much as a high enthusiasm voter. this is not work for democrats in midterms. they have not turned out the obama coalition ever in midterms. the obama coalition is very fragile right now, only women,
probably, i think of young people and african-americans, are going to turn out, and women are disapproving of president obama in high numbers in the key states right now. >> i have to get you to do this quickly. is there a race, being it senate, governor, house, that early on will tell you how the night is going? >> i'm going to be watching north carolina because libertarians and undecided could break, and that would alter things for ckay hagan. >> i would say kansas and georgia. >> i think colorado. >> that's not early. >> but it is a vote. >> i think north carolina is key. i mean, because she's held on for so long, but it really could go republican. >> thank you very much. a.b., sam, newt, stephanie, thank you so much. before you go, i want you to check something out. i'm going to do my first twitter chat, this thursday at 4:00 p.m. eastern. i'll answer your questions about
the midterm elections. if you tweet to me at crowle crowleycnn. we'll be right back. the lightest or nothing. the smartest or nothing. the quietest or nothing. the sleekest... ...sexiest, ...baddest, ...safest, ...tightest, ...quickest, ...harshest... ...or nothing. at mercedes-benz, we do things one way or we don't do them at all. introducing the all-new c-class. the best or nothing. thanks for watching "state
of the union." fareed zakaria gps starts right now. >> this is gps, the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. >> i don't know. next question. >> we'll start today's show with the attack in canada's capital. it brings up key questions. are lone wolf attacks the new normal? does canada have a jihad problem? >> plus, ebola, isis, terror. is barack obama responsible for the sense people have that the world has gotten crazily unsafe? what does it mean for the midterm elections and for the rest