tv Smerconish CNN October 22, 2016 6:00am-7:01am PDT
♪ i'm michael smerconish, coming to you lye from philadelphia. we welcome your viewers across america and around the world. 17 days until election day, who are we kidding? it's already upon us thanks to early voting and people are thronging the polls. is it over before it begins? in the final sprint with the numbers against him, donald trump is not giving up. he says his election will be brexit times five. whoever wins, what does the morning after look like?
plus, widespread condemnation of trump's debate refusal to accept the election outcome but pat buchanan is here and says criticism comes from an establishment terrified they'll never get trump supporters back in the fold. and julian assange has been on a vendetta to topple hillary clinton. but as he gone too far? are all the private e-mails he's releasing actually undermining him? but first, so often you hear from my colleagues and me that there are x days left until the election on november 8. today that number is 17. but in this presidential cycle, that number is misleading. election day is now. already more than 5 million votes have been cast, balloting is well under way by mail or at the polls in 34 of the 37 early voting states. and america has been utilizing the opportunity at a rate far outpacing 2012. more than 45 million people are expected to vote before election
day or as much as 40% of all votes cast. many endorse early voting as a means of boosting participation, but one of my guests believes it has a negative impact on the democratic process, james huffman, a visiting fellow from stanford university's hoover institution. first, while we can't see the ballots that have been cast so far, they nevertheless give us clues as to who is winning and ludsing. for that, i turn to michael mcdonald, associate professor at the university of florida and fellow at the brooks institution, specializing in elections and methodology. we do know things. what do we know? >> we know in some states if there's party registration in the state we know the party registration of the people who have voted. we can make a comparison to 2012 in many cases and then other states we know age, gender and in a very limited number of states we know the race of the people who have voted so far.
>> and you certainly know the party affiliation, right? so you can look at a particular state that allows early voting and you know who has shown up from what party or what absentee ballots have been requested from republicans as compared to democrats and presumably if they're supporting their party nominee that will give you clues. >> you would have a good suspicious that if you're a democrat you're probably supporting clinton and if you're republican you're likely supporting trump. >> i want to show you on the screen a graph that tracks the escalation of early voting in the united states. i mean, look at that. that's pretty stunning. if you go back to the 1992 cycle it's less than 10%. and as i represented at the outset in this election, 2016, we may get as high as potentially 40%. why is that the case? >> well, it started back in 1980 when california adopted no excuse absentee voting.
slowly out in the west coast a number of states adopted mail balloting options. then in the mid 1990s, texas, tn and florida adopt nod in person early voting. that's another phenomenon that spread on the east but of course some places on the west as well that use in person early voting. as states have adopted these more permissive forms of early voting, what we've seen is an expansion just as people use the option but then overtime you see once the state has adopted an early voting option, more and more people tend to use it over time. for example, in oregon, people were so accustom to using mail balloting that they decided to run their elections all by mail back in 2000. >> something that troubles me on the screen right now, people voting in georgia, where lines were up to two hours. i thought the whole idea here was to facilitate, make it easier for folks to vote. why go out and vote early if i still have to stand in line for two hours? >> you know, funny thing is if
you go back to our very founding we had in person early voting. we ran the election over several days to allow people the opportunity to get to the polling location. now what's happening right now in some of these states like georgia and north carolina is that by choice local election boards have decided to curtail the early voting option -- opportunities by reducing the number of polling locations. now, those number of locations will expand in the week prior to the election, but right now you've got a lot of people interested in voting and they're trying to get through this one bottleneck of maybe like in georgia only one polling location to vote. >> okay. so you've given us a nice primer. now let's devil into the data. tell me if i'm donald trump, is there reason for optimism in any of the early voting patterns thus far and if so, be specific, talk states. >> yeah. right. well, first of all, let's be cautious here, right? we still have a couple more weeks, 17 days.
lot can change in the election and we've still got a large volume of early voting to get through. we're at 5 million, but we're going to see over 40 million when it's all said and done. there's a lot of voting yet left to be done. that all said, when you look at the numbers, clinton is looking strong on the east coast. we can see that democrats are outperforming, at least we suspect they're outperforming in some places because we don't have party registration but in places like virginia, maine, we can see that democrats are outperforming their 2012 levels. same with florida, although it's a little complicated. and then due to various law changes. then in north carolina, what we're observing is that i think due to those bottlenecks the levels are slightly down for the democrats, but they're much further down for the republicans. and so we might suspect that there's a bit of enthusiasm gap that's actually working against the republicans in a state like north carolina. now, so that's the good news for the democrats, for clinton, is
that there's strengths so far in the east coast. we'll get some numbers on the west coast soon. they're starting to vote and we're starting to get numbers there. but it's preliminary. so, that's the good news for the democrats. the bad news for the democrats is the midwest. we've seen this in the polling all throughout this election cycle that even as the national numbers have moved towards clinton, there's been real resistance to that movement, national movement in places like iowa and ohio. when we look at the early voting numbers, we can actually see as well that democrats are not as engaged as they were in 2012. so it's just the opposite story of what we see along the eastern sea board. we see that it's democrats who are disengaged in the midwest and it's republicans who are engaged at the same levels of 2012. iowa and ohio. and i suspect because of some of the things that we can look at under the hood in iowa that some of that weakness in iowa bleeds over to south western wisconsin and that may be also why we see, although we don't have the good
comparison numbers, it's just a hunch that we have that wisconsin also we've seen clinton has a lead but it's not nearly the lead that she should have if we were thinking that there was going to be this big national swing towards the democrats. >> let me make sure we've got it for the take away. early signs for donald trump that are good, iowa, ohio and wisconsin. early signs that support hillary clinton, virginia, north carolina and florida. am i right in saying that that could represent a realignment of the parties? >> yeah. that's interesting, right? so why is it why sit that one part of the country is moving one way and another part of the country is moving another way? we first saw this back in 2008 when appalachian moved in the opposite direction of the national numbers in the waive election for the democrats in 2008. it may be that what we will see is that further sort of waive of places like virginia, north carolina moving more in the democrats direction, even though
we're going to see places like west virginia, which is in 2008 moved towards the republicans. then we see these midwestern states moving back towards the republicans as well. that is what we would think -- if that's persistent. maybe this is just a trumpb phenomenon that lasts for one election and it's gone. if it's not a flash in the pan, that may represent a fundamental change in the party coalitions that could have long-lasting effects on our politics. >> michael mcdonald, thank you for the analysis. we appreciate it. is this trend toward no excuse early voting a problem? it presumes that much of the campaigns and discussion falls on deaf ears because people already know for whom they'll be vote nothing matter what emerges. sit a threat therefore to our democratic process. james huffman is visiting fellow at stanford's university hoover institution, dean amare us the. dean huffman, you don't like this sflend is that fair to say? and if so, why not? >> that is fair to say.
and let me just summarize quickly three or four or five reasons why. i think as you've already indicated it really means that the debate that's taking place in the campaign is irrelevant to all those voters who voted early. so, the president of the united states case, he voted on october 7th. that was before the last two presidential debates. now of course we can imagine how he would vote. but what really concerns me about the debate is the down ballot candidates. i can't imagine that the president had a good read on all the down ballot candidates in illinois when he voted. so that concerns me. secondly, i think it increases the costs of elections because you don't have a peek. in oregon where i vote, you have a three-week period when ballots are being cast. thirdly, i think things can happen in the future. candidates can even die. they can change their positions. they can be revelations as we've seen about their past. fourthly, i think -- and now the
two most important points to me, one is that it's a civic event. it used to be the election. when i was a kid, i would go with my mother to the ballot place. it had some real significance. now we're basically voting alone. we're voting when ever we choose and i think that civic part of is critical. lastly it contributes to partisanship. the presumption is that people are going to know how to vote before they even know who the candidates are. they're going to vote straight party tickets. that's certainly true of some people, but i think the presumption that that's true of everybody contributes to the partisanship that ewith see in our politics. >> dean huffman, one of the arguments in support of early voting is that it boosts turnout. does the data support that argument? >> the data does not support that argument in oregon. in oregon, if you look at the ten elections before volt by mail was instituted in 1992, the
turnout was 72% by average. if you look at the turnout after 1992 the turnout was 74%, exactly the same. in primary elections turnout has gotten worse. ten elections before vote by mail the turnout was 52%. in the ten elections since, 43%. so certainly in oregon there's no evidence that it helps with turnout. >> let me just say that i agree with you that some vote too soon. the idea that in minnesota you could vote a month and a half before election day is too much. but at the other end of the spectrum is my home state of pennsylvania where it all gets done on one day and but for a showing of cause, you need to vote on that particular day. somewhere in the middle lies the proper number, perhaps it's at the conclusion of the third and final presidential debate. you get the final word. >> i think i could agree that a shorter period of time would obviously be better. maybe the last week or
something, but i think that we still shouldn't be focussed entirely on turnout. we should be focussed on having an informed electorate and an election that really is about the importance of the democratic process and the civic nature of that. >> james huffman, thank you for being here. >> it's my pleasure. thank you. what do you think? tweet me @smerconish and i'll read the best later in the program. still to come, when donald trump wouldn't say if he accept the results on election day he septemb set off a fire storm in both parties. why? pat buchanan says it's because trump scares the establishment. wikileak keeps coming providing secret embarrassments about how politics operates. is there a longer term issue? when you have something you love,
you want to protect it. at legalzoom, our network of attorneys can help you every step of the way. with an estate plan including wills or a living trust that grows along with you and your family. legalzoom. legal help is here. but...my doctor recommended prilosec otc 7 years ago, 5 years ago, last week. just 1 pill each morning. 24 hours and zero heartburn, it's been the number 1 doctor recommended brand for 10 straight years, and it's still recommended today. use as directed i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me...
with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do... release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. trulicity is not insulin. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you or a family member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area.
serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. with a non-insulin option click to activate your within. sprint? i'm hearing good things about the network. all the networks are great now. we're talking within a 1% difference in reliability of each other. and, sprint saves you 50% on most current national carrier rates. save money on your phone bill, invest it in your small business. wouldn't you love more customers? i would definitely love some new customers. sprint will help you add customers and cut your costs. switch your business to sprint and save 50% on most current verizon, at&t and t-mobile rates.
don't let a 1% difference cost you twice as much. whoooo! for people with hearing loss, visit sprintrelay.com. with another new flavor you never saw coming... grilled, glazed korean bbq shrimp. and try as much as you want of flavors like new parmesan peppercorn shrimp. just come in before it ends. ♪ well, the midnight headlight blind you on a rainy night ♪ ♪ steep grade up ahead slow me down makin' no time. ♪ but i gotta keep rollin', for the mornin' ♪ introducing the new turbocharged golf alltrack with 4motion® all-wheel drive. ♪ ooh, i'm driving my life away. ♪ soon to be everywhere. ♪ lookin' for a better way. the big headline out of the final presidential debate had nothing to do with policy, instead donald trump set off a
fire storm in the media and both major parties by refusing to say whether he would accept the election day voting results. the reason for that hysteria, my next guest pat buchanan says it's fear. in his latest article, an establishment in panic, he writes the establishment is horrified at the donald's defiance because deep within its soul it fears that the people for whom trump speaks no longer accept its political legit masy or moral authority. former presidential adviser and republican presidential candidate pat buchanan joins me now. pat, i have a different take. i think instead that the concern about what donald trump said in the final debate is about the problem that he poses for the will of the people as expressed at the ballot box. he seeks to undermine that without even knowing what the results are. how am i wrong? >> you're wrong in this sense. i don't know if the vote is going to be rigged, but i certainly do know this, michael. the system is rigged against
trump. and the fact that the hysterical reaction of the establishment to a comment that someone says, look, i don't know if i'm going to accept it, what do they think he's going to do? he's going to march on washington as the head of coxsy's army? is he going to burn down the capitol or something? is he going to say i don't accept the results and i'm not going to phone hillary rod ham clinton and express congratulations. what explains this panic over a simple comment? my belief is simply this, michael, i think the establishment is terrified that the country does not believe in its leadership and for three basic reasons that trump has raised, the establishment has left the borders open and millions of people have walked into this country and changed its character. secondly, it has exported our manufacturing base millions and millions of american jobs have been shipped overseas, dispossessing the american middle and working class. third, they got us into one war
after another after another after another. they cannot win or end. and the country has risen up against the establishment in both parties. >> you've just raised three legitimate points for public debate in the context of this election. but none when the people speak through and including on november 8 are a justification for undermining the properly chosen successor to barack obama and that's what he seeks to do. >> let me give you some reasons. number one, bernie sanders ran a fair, tough fight. was not the outcome fixed against him by the superdelegates and the national committee working with the clinton administration as well as the white house and as well as the media working against him? donald trump and ted cruz won 75% of the republican vote. a vast majority of the country, 75% says we would like dramatic change in washington and we're going to wind up with no change in washington if the election
goes the way it's going. now you tell me that's not a rigged system. >> pat, it's not a rigged system. i mean, debbie wasserman schultz may have had her thumb on the scale relative to the dnc, but i don't think she effected the outcome of the election. you're giving way too much credence and credit to her ability as the head of the dnc to play favorites and influence the outcome. >> let me tell you -- look, the country wants change and it's not getting it. one of the major reasons is the media. now the 19th century marx said power is the control of the means of production. arthur said about 1960, power is control of the means of communication. the left in the establishment control 85% of the communications in the united states. they have overwhelmingly weighed the scales against trump. they have attacked him. look, trump made a statement about rapists when he came down that elevator. it's been repeated 10,000 times. hillary clinton has called half
of trump supporters racist, sexist, home foebs, irredeemable. which of those two quotes has cnn used more often? >> you are con florida stating the rigging of an election with media bias and that is something -- let me finish now because i've been fair to you. that's something that donald trump has done without being challenged on it. you reference in your current piece the clinton cable. i assume that's a shot at cnn with regard to the way in which we covered trump's statement in the debate the other night. let me show you "the wall street journal." "the wall street journal" is not clinton cable. here is what the journal, a republican or kal said that again is mr. trump's ego talking, a man who doesn't like to lose refusing to take responsibility for his campaign, voters on the right and left want to have faith in the elect torl system. that's my argument. you're setting the stage for people to wake up on november 9 and question the legit masy if it's hillary and if she's won
fair and square. that's not right. >> look, i'm telling you -- i don't know that the vote would be rigged. i didn't say that. i said the system is rigged. >> you used the rigged word, pat. >> the system is rigged. okay? you said cnn. now you mentioned "wall street journal." editorial page horribly hostile to trump. new york times, washington post, you can't -- pick up that paper without reading anti-trump stuff. the free networks, the cable networks except for fox overwhelming the left in the establishment control the media and they are controlling the outcome of this election and the very fact -- what are we supposed to do? get up and salute? i'm in virginia. the governor of virginia six months ago says i'm going to make 200,000 convicts voters by november and by executive order. i'm supposed to salute that and say isn't this a wonderful example of democracy. the point is go back to the basics. the borders have been opened up. millions of people brought in to change the character of the
american electorate to where the conservatives and middle america can never win again. that's the point of my column and it is the truth. >> your argument about the media ended in 1992. the media today is whatever you want it to be. it was liberal. today it's breitbart, it's drudge, it's a.m./talk radio. it's all of that if you want it to be. whatever you want to find it's out there. here is what i'm saying with regard to your three items of substance which i think are legitimate issues, go and win it fair and square. and if you can't win it fair and square, then don't whine about it when it's over and say, well, the whole thing was rigged. >> you tell me why 75% of the american people want a dramatic change? they want it in the democratic party. we saw what happened to bernie. they got it in the republican party. we're getting the same people who brought us the wars, who brought us open borders, who exported american manufacturing, who gave away all those jobs,
who are responsible for the arresting of the working americans. do you think all those folks out there in middle america are enraged and turning out at trump rallies, bringing him to a point at one point where he was not only even with hillary rod ham clinton but looked like he was on the verge of victory despite the worst and most savage beating i've ever seen by the media against the candidate. you think all that is some kind of accident, michael? >> that beating has been administered to donald trump with his own words and actions. ten women hadn't come out and said that he sexually assaulted them, there would be nothing on that score for us to be reporting. come on, pat. >> now why are you running -- you guys spent all this time figuring out why trump should not have said that miss usa to spend all her time in burger king at the same time you've got all kinds of great problems going on in this country. you focussed on trivial pursuit. i admit you have these little misdemeanors. what is important about this
country? the big issues. are you guys focussed on those or focussed on the running around gathering up these women to make trump look bad? i mean, the point is if you think that trump has a fair deal in this election, i don't know how you can say that. you're not watching the same media the rest of america is. why is the media's reputation so low, michael? why are they so detested out there in middle america? >> 17 days are left. this ought to be plenty of reason for people to go and vote. they can choose their side and act accordingly. by the way, i'm not on either of these sides. i just want full participation. all right. patrick, thank you. get your final word in. >> i've watched you on tv. i think i know who you're going to vote for, michael. i think the other viewers do as well. >> i don't think so, patrick. that's why there are curtains on that ballot booth. thank you, my friend. >> thank you. keep tweeting me. @mer skonish. still to come, we learned a
lot from wikileaks recent live, but at what cost to our democratic process. dan abrams is here to discuss. b? try align junior probiotic. so she can have a fraction dominating... status updating... hello-yellow-belt kind of day. get 24/7 digestive support with align junior. the #1 doctor recommended probiotic brand, now for kids.
went up the waterspout. down came the rain... ...and clogged the gutter system creating a leak in the roof. luckily the spider recently had geico help him with homeowners insurance. water completely destroyed his swedish foam mattress. he got full replacement and now owns the sleep number bed. his sleep number setting is 25. call geico and see how much you could save on homeowners insurance. when they thought they should westart saving for retirement.le then we asked some older people when they actually did start saving. this gap between when we should start saving and when we actually do is one of the reasons why too many of us aren't prepared for retirement. just start as early as you can. it's going to pay off in the future. if we all start saving a little more today, we'll all be better prepared tomorrow.
prudential. bring your challenges. - i was diagnosed with parin early 2013.lly it took awhile to sink in. we had to think a little more seriously about saving money for the future and for the kids. - the income of airbnb really helped to mitigate the stress. - but we have that flexibility of knowing that if you know things get worse, we have this to help keep us afloat. - so that's very, very important for us.
♪ we have wikileaks to thank for the release of hillary clinton's paid speeches to wall street and a presidential debate conversation as to her desire for hemispheric open borders she says with regard to energy. arguably that information added to the public discourse. but what about a 2015 e-mail wherein john podesta referred to bernie sanders as a dufus or the e-mail which revealed that bill clinton went out to buy his granddaughter baby wipes. what public service was served with that revelation? what's most troubling about the hakt vichl of found eer julian
assange. he has been on a vendetta threatening to release materials so damaging to hillary clinton she could never get elected. my view is that many have cheered the document drop because it suits their short-term partisan political interests without thinking through the long-term privacy implications. marco rubio is an exception. he warned his party away from using such material saying today it's the democrats. tomorrow it could be us. so what is the future of such elicit hacks to our democracy, our privacy and the electoral system. joining me now the founder of media lite and law news news with a z and abc news legal analyst dan abrams. i was eager to have you back, dan, because your sights publ h published some of the wikileaks information about colin powell and you had second thoughts about it. >> well, i had second thoughts in the sense that i thought we needed to have this discussion the one that we're having.
look, with regard to wikileaks, my sites have been publishing that information as well. the most important thing to me when it comes to something like this is let's not just say wikileaks is releasing this. let's call it what it is. hacked, stolen documents. stolen e-mails. and now it is clear likely at the hands of russia. i think that needs to be part of the discussion. does that mean it's not accurate? you have the clinton camp sort of winking and saying, well, we can't verify. and the media organizations have to say, we can't verify. of course they're true. if they weren't true, if it wasn't real, they would be coming out and saying we can't -- instead of not -- we can't verify they would be saying this stuff isn't true. this stuff is made up. so let's accept the fact that what's in there is true. when you do that, it's tough not to report on it.
but i also think there is an obligation to keep reminding people that it's a really bad thing that the russians, it seems, are hacking into our political figure's private e-mails to try to influence the election. doesn't mean the information is not true. doesn't mean we shouldn't use it. does mean we should be highlighting it. >> does the requirement therefore become for the media to take it all? i want to run through a couple of recent revelations and ask dan abrams is this the sort of thing that should enter the public domain? here is the most recent, donald trump says this is evidence of a quid pro quo. it involves the clinton global initiative and whether she would go and meet with the king of ma rock koe in return for allegedly reportedly a $12 million endowment from the king to cgi. that would seem to have great relevance against the backdrop of trump's pay to play allegations.
yet let me show you another one. here comes -- put up number two. this is the baby wipes. bill is picking up charlotte for baby sitting. they had to go out and sanitize the whole house. seems a bit ridiculous that that would be in the public domain. number three, just two or three more -- is the comment about bernie sanders. this is john podesta. can you believe that dufus? this seems to have some legit masy. this is the hemispheric common market open trade and open markets the open border one. then finally -- that's i guess enough of them. so dan as a media outlet or proprietor of media outlets, do you take them a case at a time? what do you do? >> in a different day and age, let's say 30 years ago. more importantly before the internet, media organizations would go through and very, very carefully decide is this important enough? is this in the public interest? is this private? the reality is that now a media
organization can decide -- npr for example is going through great hand wringing over these wikileaks disclosures and yet the reality is whether npr does or doesn't report on some of the more mundane and private aspects that you're talking about, it's out there. i know it's a cop out answer, right, to say you know what, it's out there any way so what are we going to do, but it's also the reality. the reality is the minute in this day and age that wikileaks is releasing it, everyone is going to have it. if a handful of media organizations say, you know, we're not going to disclose this piece of information or that piece of information, i get it. that's a nice principled position to take, but it's also living in an alternate universe where the media sort of leaders had the power to decide what the public got to see. those days are over. >> dan abrams, thank you for
your analysis. >> good to be with you, michael. >> donald trump last night said the election will be brexit times five that he's going to up end all expectations. thomas frank says that many brits fear the same and blame journalists. we'll find out why. and jd vance is here. plus, everyone has election day november 8 circled on their calend calendar. i'm worried about the day after. how can anyone put the pieces back together again? [alarm clock beeping]
donald trump's debate refusal to say that he'll accept the election outcome only heightened my worry about november 9, the day after the election ends. the only certainty is that slightly less than half the nation will wake up in a funk. according to polls, even many who voted for the winning candidate will have done so reluctantly. our reaction and that of the candidates will set the course for the next four years. so here are a few thoughts.
first, from the sit senary, we need to let go of all his rhetoric and let him start from scratch. if clinton wins, we must put to fix the fix asian with benghazi and her e-mail server. it's too much to ask that their past will be forgotten but reasonable to request that they move on in the name of national unity. as for the candidates if trump wins, he needs to be magnanim s magnanimous, he should immediately retire his twitter account and banish the term crooked hillary from his lexicon. his cabinet and senior staff appointments should include people of color. he should accept the legitimacy of his fate with grace. clearly a tall order for him. clinton wins, she should immediately reach across the aisle. she should request that the senate confirm merrick garland to the supreme court in lieu of her selecting a pick of her own. should she lose, she must be
gracious and give trump the opportunity to show that actions speak louder than words. as for the new congress, the nation can ill afford another con fab where a leader tells his party that it's quote the single most important goal to make the opposition a one-term president. it's healthy for one party to wish to defeat another. but the nation just can't afford the type of attacks president obama has endured being redirected toward his successor. is an uneasy truce realistic? i have the perfect guests. welcome back, jd vance, author of the best selly "hill billy eligible" and thomas frank. thomas frank, react to my naivety? >> well, i think civility is important. it's a very important value. it will be a relief to get a little of it after all this is over. but i think issues are more important. i think that dealing with the
crisis that a lot of people are facing in their lives that we've seen via the trump movement that that's more important. that's my view. >> jd, you heard perhaps at the outset of the program professor michael mcdonald he thinks there's potentially a realignment taking place in this country largely along the divide of education. you are so plugged into the trump constituency, what becomes of them should donald trump lose? and i'm speaking politically. >> yeah. well, i think a lot of people would obviously be very frustrated. they'll still fundamentally be a part of the political party. if donald trump decides to make this election about how it was stolen from him, then folks will be angry and they will be less engaged in the political process than they otherwise would be. i hope he follows your advice and acts mag nam nan mouse. >> do they necessarily follow his leadership? does donald trump have control
of that constituency that you write about from appalachia by way of illustration or was he just right place at the right time? >> i think it's a little bit right place, right time. because of that he definitely has a certain leadership role within this community because he's been the person who sort of thumbs his nose up at the elites. and that makes him pretty popular among this group of people. so i don't think that people will necessarily follow donald trump, but i also think he has a certain place just because of the way this election is unfolded and i hope he uses it well, which maybe he will, maybe he won't. >> thomas frank, pat buchanan was here earlier and talked about the rigged nature of the election in his eyes. and i wonder if things that he said about bernie sanders you speak so well for the liberal community, things that he said about the bernie sanders constituency, did that represent a rare agreement between you and pat buchanan? >> by the way, i really enjoyed that interview. i've never heard someone in american television refer to
coxsy's army ever before. that's the first time. there's -- you know, i think that -- so the cover story in the latest issue of harpers is something that i wrote about how the media specifically "the washington post" treated bernie sanders. and you know, yeah, there's a sense that it was really unfair, but look, this is you're asking about the larger question about whether or not people should accept the results even though it's unfair. well, of course they should, you know. no question about that. that's how the system works. >> well, jd, if we saw a repeat like the year 2000 where there was a divide between the popular vote and the electoral college, i would of course expect mr. trump or mrs. clinton to hang in until the very last vote is counted. i'm worried and what i tried to express is i'm worried about the undermining of whomever is elected by the will of the people on november 8 because there will come a november 9.
what's your idea of how we best move forward? >> yeah. well, i think you're absolutely right that there's a difference between using the legitimate judicial process to challenge the results of an election versus actually questioning whether is that election was rigged or whether the outcome once the courts decide it's legitimate actually going after the outcome. i think that's a really serious problem and the way that we have to move forward is i think on the republican side, republican leaders just have to do a better job. i think that trump is fundamentally a result of their political failure in the first place, the failure to recognize that these voters who are part of their constituency feel very underserved. and they have an opportunity, i think, on november 9th of 2016 to do a job by these folks. if they don't, we'll continue to have some of the same problems that plagued us in the first place. >> there's a consistency now to the polls, thomas, both the national polls and the swing state polls. donald trump said last night, hey, this is going to be brexit
times five. you were just in the uk. what's the view from over there? >> well, they're scared. i talked to many, many people -- by the way, i spent most of my time in london, but not all of my time. but i couldn't -- i didn't meet a single person who supported the brexit. this had come to everybody i met as a terrible shock, a terrible event. and every single one of them is convinced that trump is going to win. i would say to them, well, you know, he's well behind in the polls. and they say, well the polls don't mean anything anymore. and i would try to explain the electoral college and that sort of thing. no dice. they were absolutely convinced that this guy was going to win. it was really strange. >> jd, among those you write about in "hill billy eligible" they're hearing how this appears to have turned in the last couple weeks. how are they rationalizing that data? >> well, i think a lot of folks
think that the polls just don't reflect reality, they see trump is six or seven or eight points behind. no, at his rallies or online polls on cnn or so forth he is actually winning and don't recognize obviously that those aren't especially scientific methods of choosing the candidate. so i think that a lot of folks if trump loses as the polls tell us he will i do think a lot of folks will be very surprised and again it falls back on the political leadership to say, look, it's not good. we wish he hadn't lost but he did and we got to move forward as a country together because if we don't do that, if the republican party doesn't at least serve that role then who knows how people react. at the end of the day, people follow political leaders. >> i agree with you. i've got as i say november 9 the day after circled for that reason in the name of national unity we need to come out of this. thank you, gentlemen, as always. i appreciate you being here. still to come, your best and worst tweets. can we put one up?
what do we got? buchanan just watched you put a smack down on smerconish. thank you for saying what we are all saying. well, i don't think it was a smackdown. but i appreciate having pat here as i always do. make sure the germs they bring home don't stick around. use clorox disinfecting products. because no one kills germs better than clorox. i'm raph. my name is anne. i'm one of the real live attorneys you can talk to through legalzoom. don't let unanswered legal questions hold you up, because we're here, we're here, and we've got your back. legalzoom. legal help is here.
legal help is here. sprint? i'm hearing good things about the network. all the networks are great now. we're talking within a 1% difference in reliability of each other. and, sprint saves you 50% on most current national carrier rates. save money on your phone bill, invest it in your small business. wouldn't you love more customers? i would definitely love some new customers. sprint will help you add customers and cut your costs. switch your business to sprint and save 50% on most current verizon, at&t and t-mobile rates. don't let a 1% difference cost you twice as much. whoooo! for people with hearing loss, visit sprintrelay.com. i spent many years as a nuclear missile launch officer. if the president gave the order, we had to launch the missiles. that would be it. i prayed that call would never come. self control may be all that keeps these missiles from firing. i would bomb the [ beep ] out of 'em. i want to be unpredictable. i love war. the thought of donald trump with nuclear weapons scares me to death. it should scare everyone. i'm hillary clinton and i approve this message.
you can follow me on twitter if you can spell smerconish. here's what came in during the course of this program. smerconish, graphic wrong for early voting, north carolina. we apologize. it did start october 20. what else? smerconish, you are a rude man. the way you yelled at pat buchanan today was disgusting because buchanan was right and you are not. holly, i pride myself on civility. i don't think i was rude. i was disagreeing with pat buchanan and that right i will
not surrender. pat to me like donald trump conflates media bias a legitimate subject of debate, with the rigging of an election for which i have seen absolutely no substace to support trump's arguments or pat's. next tweet, please. smerconish, nice job. look at this. there it is. so pat now comes across as bully. i think that these two tweets back to back just show that in these partisan times people see and hear what they want to see and hear. by the end of this program i will be accused for some for carrying water for the right and some carrying water for the right. somewhere in the middle lies the truth. smerconi smerconish, don't give wikileaks any validation and don't report it. you are abetting stolen goods. i think there's a tendency to rush all of these leaks presumably stolen by the russians right in to our media platforms without first starting to say, well, how did this
actually get obtained. it troubles me. i think those who are cheering the release of data about hillary today will regret it tomorrow when it's about the republicans. thank you for watching. sweet me @smerconish. i'll see you next week. to bring an entire stadium to its feet. you missed it, buddy. it's all good. weet me @smerconish. i'll see you next week. tweet me. i'll see you next week. bounty is two times more absorbent. more "sit" per roll. so one roll of bounty can last longer than those bargain brands. so you get more "life" per roll. bounty. the long-lasting quicker picker upper. i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me that i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity.
trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. it should be used along with diet and exercise. trulicity is not recommended as the first medicine to treat diabetes and should not be used by people with severe stomach or intestinal problems or people with type i diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. trulicity is not insulin and has not been studied with long-acting insulin. do not take trulicity if you or anyone in your family has had medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 or if you are allergic to trulicity or its ingredients. stop using trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of an allergic reaction, such as itching, rash, or difficulty breathing; if you have signs of pancreatitis such as severe stomach pain that will not go away
and may move to your back, with or without vomiting or if you have symptoms of thyroid cancer, which may include a lump or swelling in your neck, hoarseness, trouble swallowing, or shortness of breath. medicines like trulicity may cause stomach problems, which could be severe. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and any medicines you take. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney failure. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option, click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. abdbloating?in? you may have ibs. ask your doctor if non-prescription ibgard is right for you. ibgard calms the angry gut. available at cvs, walgreens and rite aid.
how good to see you. i'm christi paul. >> i'm victor blackwell. "cnn newsroom" begins right now. battleground blitz. that's what we're calling it this morning. hillary clinton and donald trump zeroing in on pennsylvania, ohio, virginia today as we enter the final stretch to election day. >> here's the game plan as we know it for both candidates and the surrogates. in just a short time donald trump is going to kick off the