tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN January 23, 2017 11:00pm-12:01am PST
again, at the bottom of your screen. it's unitedwayswga.org. they clearly need a lot of help there right now. that does it for us, thanks for watching. "cnn tonight with don lemon" starts now. day four of the trump administration and the president is getting down to business. this is cnn tonight, i'm don lemon, breaking news to tell you about, mike pompeo confirmed by the senate. and sworn in by vice president pence. the president signs executive orders on trade, abortion and a federal hiring freeze. meets with congressional leaders and ceos at the white house. apparently turns a page on those so-called alternative facts about the size of the crowd. sean spicer saying, quote, our intention is never to lie to you. meanwhile, the fbi is investigating preinaugural phone calls. spicer saying the president
hasn't ordered intelligence agencies to hold an investigation. >> he's not made any indication that he would stop an investigation of any sort. >> let's begin with our breaking news. jim sciutto and jim acosta with the breaking news for us. cnn is it learning more about president trump's meeting with congressional leaders today, where he continues to make false claims about why he lost the popular vote in the 2016 election by almost 3 million. what's he saying? >> when you thought the white house had turned the page from alternative facts, donald trump was presenting one when he was talking with congressional leaders at the white house earlier this evening. it's not an alternative fact, just a falsehood. sources told cnn what was going on inside that reception. the new president said he would have won the popular vote had it not been for the millions of what he calls illegal votes. this is something he had said shortly after the november election. he said it in a tweet.
he would have won the popular vote, had it not been for the illegal ballots, which is a swipe at undocumented people in this country, accusing them of voting, which is something they cannot do. it's against the law. just again, when you thought they were turning the page. they had photo opportunities, showing the president looking presidential, meeting with advisers and with business leaders, so on. they've gotten themselves back into a controversy here. and not only that, but steny hoyer, a top democrat, who was at the reception, said that donald trump was talking about this inauguration crowd size issue. so, it seems he can't move on from some of these petty grievances he has about the election. >> jim sciutto, i want to talk about something also. when he talked with congress, he talked about 3 million to 5 million illegals voting. that's why he lost the popular
vote. that's just not true. >> no. it's not true. it's not the only untruth uttered by the administration today, and in the last couple of days. keep in mind, he went to the cia and went beyond talking about crowd size there. massively unimportant. he talked about how the media had manufactured the dispute with the intelligence community, when in fact, donald trump in public comments that exist out there in tweets and video statements, had undermined the intelligence community. questioned their loyalty, really. questioned their lack of bias. that was one. and that was one that sean spicer had a chance, today, to knock down and did not knock down. you have these -- these lies, really, of import, right? these matter. whether it's about the election and how it worked and these falsified fake voters about his dispute with the intelligence community. and undermining the intelligence community. these matter, these matter and
the administration continues to propagate them. >> it's tough, as i was sitting here getting ready to report this story, it's -- you know, you want to -- you must respect the office of the presidency, it's hard to say that the president is lying. so you say falsehood. when you say things that aren't true, they're just lies. jim sciutto, what about the people who are around him, the people who are advising him, why can't they just come out and say, mr. president, you should not be saying these things, because they're flatout lies? >> the truth is we don't know, it's early in the administration. but if we could look at the campaign and the period between the election and the inauguration, you see some patterns here. i think to some degree there is a belief inside the administration, the president, his advisers, that they're not getting a fair shake, right? and i think you see this in some of the public comments of the president himself.
the people -- he's said this in so many words. the media, others, democrats is trying to delegitimize his victory. these issues, whether it's russian hacking of the election, election related hacking, or the popular vote, or crowd size at the inauguration they get in that space, what seems to be a sensitive space for trump and the administration. now, they can make an argument that they're not getting a fair shake or there's a bias against them. they can make that argument, on the facts they can't argue the facts, right? whether it's the crowd size at the inauguration or there's not substantiation of even a dozen illegal voters, let alone 3 million to 5 million. those, as journalists, as americans, citizens, members of congress, you can't let those hang out there unchallenged. >> the weird thing is, is that the media didn't bring up russia, it was the intelligence agency. the media didn't bring up the popular vote, that was donald trump.
the media didn't bring up the crowd sizes was all the president's doing. that came out of the president's own mouth. you asked sean spicer about that today, and not getting a fair shake? >> i did, that's right. it was notable that during this press briefing today, they were really trying to move forward, and move past what was a pretty ugly episode that we saw on saturday, when sean spicer came out into that briefing room and went after the news media. during this briefing today, he was much more cool, calm and collected, answered a number of questions from various different reporters. at one point said, to one reporter that he has no intention to lie in that briefing room, lie to the press. and then at one point, toward the end of the briefing, i asked sean spicer, why is it that the president is focused on things, doesn't he have bigger fish to fry? here's what he had to say to that.
>> isn't that just part of the conversation that happens in washington? >> no, it's not. >> being president of the united states and looking at the white house -- >> no, i've been doing this a long time, you've been doing this too. i've never seen it like this, it's a little demoralizing. you are sitting there and looking out, you're in awe at how many people are there, you go back and turn on the television, and you see shots of comparing this and that, it's frustrating for not just him, but so many of us that are trying to work to get this message out. >> jim, he says demoralizing, which is interesting, because this is washington, d.c. this is the highest office in the land. there's a lot of scrutiny that goes along with it, this is only day four, and this -- our reporting does not happen in a vacuum. has he forgotten how donald trump conducted himself on the
campaign trail which warranted some tough coverage because of the words that came out of his own mouth? >> i think that's right, don. there are going to be demoralizing days at this white house. and they're going to have to deal with much bigger issues than inauguration crowd size. but what sean spicer was trying to do was get to this point that they feel there's this automatic default setting for negative news coverage. and he does garner a lot of negative news coverage, as you said, primarily this is because of things that have come out of donald trump's mouth. when you take today, for example, when he's signing these executive orders in the oval office. meeting with business leaders and so on, and he has the opportunity to turn the page, has a fairly successful news briefing, at the very end of the day, when they could just tie a ribbon around the whole thing and go home and crack open a cold one when they go home,
he has to go and ignite this controversy that seems to be pulled out of thin air. millions of people -- millions of undocumented voters did not cast ballots in this election. that's a falsehood, full stop. i asked sean spicer, did the president force you to go out there and make these statements? he did not answer those questions. he didn't want to get into private conversations with the president. people were feeling very good after that press briefing. tomorrow's press briefing is going to be dominated by the claims he made tonight. >> i watched the press briefing today. i thought sean spicer conducted himself with dignity. much better press briefing than the one he held on the first day. i thought this is a pretty good day. and then at the end of the day, this happens. jim sciutto, you know, the president and his team are trying to get back on track. you have new reporting for us on u.s. intelligence investigation into the president's national security adviser, what can you tell us?
>> that's exactly right. law enforcement and intelligence officials toll me and my colleague there's a continuing investigation of phone calls in late december between the national security adviser and the russian ambassador to the u.s. a couple key points about this, one still being investigated and two, it's not just that the phone calls themselves took place, apparently some of the content of those phone calls, some things that were said in those phone calls raised potential concerns which has led to this continuing investigation. i should make it clear that there has been no wrongdoing established by michael flynn in this investigation so far. i should make it clear these phone calls were monitored as part of the routine counter intelligence gathering of u.s. intelligence agencies targeting not michael flynn but foreign officials, particularly those in the u.s. as foreign intelligence agencies
would monitor the u.s. officials operating in those countries. it was in monitoring of those conversations they picked up these conversations with general michael flynn. and one final note here, don, the timing of one of those calls is material, because it was december 29th, the same day the obama administration was still in charge, was imposing new sanctions on russia, and expelling 35 russian diplomats. so that timing has raised questions as well. >> jim and jim, i appreciate it. thank you so much. when we come back, president trump delivering on a major campaign promise today. it's a great thing for american workers but also a great thing for china maybe? audi pilotless vehicles have conquered highways, mountains, and racetracks. and now much of that same advanced technology is found in the audi a4. with one notable difference... ♪ the highly advanced audi a4,
my advice for looking get your beauty sleep. and use aveeno® absolutely ageless® night cream with active naturals® blackberry complex. younger looking skin can start today. absolutely ageless® from aveeno®. oh, look! we've got fees ew, really? oh, it's our verizon bill look at them. line access fee, administrative fees, there are even taxes on top of them. decent people shouldn't have to live like this did i get it? t-mobile ends surprise fees and taxes that's right, with t-mobile one, taxes and fees are now included 4 lines, 40 bucks each. all unlimited, all in. isjust wanna see ifa again? my score changed... you wanna check yours? scores don't change that much. i haven't changed. oh, really?
it's the very early days for the trump administration. only day four. he's already signaling some major changes in the world order. let's discuss now. fareed zakaria, thanks for joining us. let's talk about the trans pacific partnership and trade agreement. he promised to get us out of it, today he withdrew. it's a great thing for the american worker, and i have to tell both bernie sanders and hillary clinton opposed tpp. i remember being in a debate, discussing it in flint, as well. what is the bottom line, what does this mean for the american people and the american worker? >> it's a very good deal and it's a very bad and sad day.
95% of the world's consumers live outside of america. about half the world economy at this point. 40% of the world economy was part of tpp. we already have a pretty open economy. the trans pacific partnership did, it opened up the other economies that were signatories, japan, vietnam, you know, countries like that, and huge reductions. american companies, american workers would have sold more into those countries. we're already open, so the concessions were mostly made by countries like vietnam, japan, for a country that -- donald trump has been railing against japan's closed markets since the 1980s, well, tpp for the first time significantly opened
japan's markets. so for the american worker, whatever the rhetoric, this is actually a bad deal. the second point is, from a strategic point of view, today is the day that the united states essentially handed over a share on a platter to china, there was a battle for influence in asia, it was essentially around trade, the united states had told all these countries, ally with us and we'll band together to protect you against china about we backed away, and the chinese have already proposed an alternative, australia, which was part of our grouping initially, has already said it's going to join the chinese one now. we would prefer to sign up with america, but if america is walking away, we'll sign up with china. >> mexico is going to do something else. they don't want to be so reliant on imports from from the united states. are we shrinking instead of expanding? >> yes, we're building walls while the chinese are going out
and doing deals that benefit them. >> mexico's part of the tpp as canada. it's countries bordering the pacific. mexico, because it borders the pacific. canada also. there are a lot of things that people have wished we could do with nafta, renegotiate nafta. there were some problems in nafta, the tpp actually fixed those problems, it got the mexicans to make concessions on labor standards on environmental issues, that we had always wanted ever since nafta. but they're gone now, because we walked away from the tpp. maybe the mexicans will make those same concessions in a bilateral negotiation with trump. they kind of made them in the
context of access to 12 countries, 40% of the world's gdp. it's not clear to me we'll get them, the irony is, we had them. we already had the concession, we had the renegotiation of nafta that trump is talking about, all he had to do was sign it. >> bernie sanders and hillary clinton were opposed as well. >> hillary was part of the negotiation of this, called it the gold standard of trade agreements. she was right there, in the campaign she flip-flopped, she thought she would lose union votes. don't flip-flop on principle, it's the wrong thing to do, and you never get those votes anyway. >> also on this one, there are many campaign promises that happen that people don't keep. or you evolve or sort of renegotiate, is this one that donald trump should have done that? should he have done that? >> i think so. if he had read the details of the -- if he had been briefed on it, he would have understood mexico makes all those concessions he wants. this is seeding ground to china in a big way. it's the other countries making these concessions, we already have an open market.
tariffs in the united states are about 3%. >> how would you have advised him? >> go to these countries and say to them, guys, i need a couple concessions sao i can go back and say we have a better deal. get those concessions and say, tpp was bad, i got these three very important changes and guess what, now we can sign it. we're going to sign it so china doesn't dominate the world economy. and you can sell your goods into japan, and you can sell your goods into vietnam. >> the white house press secretary, he talked about china's claims over islands in the south china sea, here's what he said about. >> i think areas in the south china sea that are part of international waters and international activities, the u.s. is going to make sure we protect our interests there. it's a question of, if those islands are in fact in international waters and not part of china proper, we
want to make sure we defend international territories from being taken over by one country. >> when he said defend, does that mean military action? >> presumably it does. the u.s. has always said it will protect freedom of navigation around the world. i don't have a problem with that at all. we should be protecting the freedom of navigation as we have done. the issue is, however, in asia, trade is the game. china is not going to be so stupid as to try to go around invading countries. what china's willing to do is dominate them economically. look at what china did in latin america. the president of china, while trump is talking about protectionism and tariffs and literally walling ourselves off from our southern neighbors. the president of china went to latin america, promised $250 billion of investment, signed 40 deals in a five-day trip. what he's saying is, you can't rely on the u.s., they're closing down.
they're turning inward, rely on us, we will be your engine of growth and investment, that's the game. talking about islands in the south china sea, fine. you defend them, while china's dominating the world economy. >> there's russia and a syrian piece i want to get in. sean spicer today indicated the trump administration may be willing to work with russia to fight isis. also saying he didn't rule out working with bashar al assad in syria as well. is this dangerous? >> what is dangerous is the illusion. if you can get the russians to do it, fine. the truth is, russia has done almost nothing against isis, it's very important to understand this. russia has mainly been supporting the assad government against a rag-tag bunch of free syrian armies, it's note really attacked isis. that's been part of assad's strategy, to let isis flourish.
you either pick me or isis. the idea that russia's going to change that strategy and go after isis, when it hasn't for five years. i think it will do something cosmetic, it will be a win for trump and show a certain amount of cooperation. it seems very unlikely. if we want to go after isis, the people fighting isis are iran, that's the irony here. the trump administration doesn't seem to understand who is really fighting isis. it's the united states, iraq and iran. >> i'm always smarter after you leave the room. thank you very much. i appreciate it, fareed. when we come back, a lawsuit filed against president trump today saying he's been violating the constitution since day one. is there a case there? i'm going to ask our experts.
he is a chief white house ethics lawyer under george w. bush and one of the lawyers bringing the lawsuit. nor brookbinder, through the nonprofit watchdog group. and the state ethic legal adviser. i can't wait to hear what you have to say about this. donald trump is violating the constitution. by allowing trump hotels to take payments and business from foreign governments. here's how president trump responded to your lawsuit. >> mr. president, reaction to the lawsuit today. >> thank you. walk out the side door, please. thank you, please. >> without merit. totally without merit. >> we think it has tremendous merit. the lawsuit, we're represented in this lawsuit by the top ethics adviser for president obama and president bush. top bipartisan exlerts by some
of the top legal scholars in the country. these people wouldn't have brought the lawsuit if we didn't think it had significant merit. you have a president who had an opportunity to sell business businesses, separate himself from his businesses, he wouldn't have these problems if he had done that. he didn't. now you have a situation where he's on a day-to-day basis, accepting payments from foreign countries which the constitution prohibits which puts you in danger of having him make decisions that are -- that benefit his business interests. that benefit these foreign countries. instead of being made in the best interest of the american people. >> senator bernie sanders spoke about the lawsuit on cnn earlier tonight. listen to this. >> we want a president who is going to make decisions based on the needs of the american people. not based on foreign investments and the people who own his debt. i think this is an issue that has to be looked at very thoroughly, and i do have
serious concerns. >> do you share his concerns? or do you agree with president trump that the suit has no merit? >> well, let's talk about the suit, the complaint has no merit. the interpretation of the clause that the complaint serves up has -- there's no -- there's not a single court decision or opinion of the office of legal council of the justice department that supports their interpretation. another thing, it's interesting, brief comments, introductory comments you made, and that noah bookbinder made, the complaint conflates the question of the emolument clause and natures the questions of the senator sanders comments, reflect this, too.
and the issue of the conflict of interest laws of the u.s. there is a very specific conflict of interest law. and it very specifically excludes the president and vice president from its coverage. so i think as we go through this discussion we need to keep in mind which it is that we're talking about. again, if you want to talk about alternative facts, noah bookbinder's comment that trump could have disposed of his assets are not true. his assets are tremendously complicated. and he couldn't have done it. >> noah, you want to respond? >> happy to respond. what he should have done is to turn over his companies to a trustee, and give the difficult job of figuring out how to dispose of them to that trustee, that kind of thing has been done. it's been done for other officials, it's a kind of thing that is doable. it would have been difficult. it wouldn't have been his problem, it would have been the trustee's problem. respectfully, while there are separate laws for conflicts and for these foreign payments that are addressed in the
constitution, the principle is the same. the principle is that you want the president of the united states or any american official making decisions based on what is in the best interest of the american people and of the country, not based on personal or financial interests. the principle is the same. >> richard, you sat by patiently. i want you to get in. we're talking about the emoluments clause. the government office holder can benefit financially from a foreign state. earlier this month, donald trump's lawyer said the clause doesn't apply here, watch this, and then we'll discuss. >> no one would have thought when the constitution was written that paying your hotel bill was an emolument. instead, it would have been thought of as a value for value exchange. not a gift. not an entitle. and not an emolument. >> correct me if i'm wrong. she's making a similar claim as ed here.
is she right? is ed right? >> no. that's not right. and the oldest conflict of interest laws in the united states are in the constitution, and they're focused on foreign governments, the founders are very worried about foreign governments. so worried they insisted the president be a natural born citizen. we certainly heard a lot about that from mr. trump over many years. this provision is far more important. it's the requirement that nobody holding a position of trust with the united states government can be receiving presents or emoluments. it refers to benefits from foreign governments. and if someone is buying and selling merchandise or leasing hotel rooms to foreign governments, that's fine. but that person cannot hold a position of trust with the united states government. that's what the founders intended.
and mr. trump knew this when he was running for president. now he's president trump. he cannot be making profits and other benefits from business transactions with foreign governments. and many of these transactions we don't even know about. it's not just hotel rooms, it's financing, bank loans from the bank of china. loans that may be coming into all of his businesses. we don't know what the debt is on his businesses? it's not disclosed in his financial disclosure form. it could have be from all over the world. that's the type of thing the founders did not want happening, they knew that european powers, other powers would want to interfere in our political system. great britain, france, austria, hungary and russia, and that's what's going on right now, we're not going to put up with it. >> ed, i'm sure you want to respond. >> i don't know where to start. i would ask richard, where in the complaint is there a court decision or an olc opinion cited
that supports that interpretation? to the contrary, i think if you look at the white paper that the trump lawyers put together, they cite several. in addition, if you do things such as look at the federalist papers which alexander hamilton and james madison wrote to explain the constitution to the people. they make a dozen or so references to emoluments. and it's used a couple times in the constitution, no interpretation that they give comes close to what richard just outlined. it's essentially a payment in respect of service performed in an office. >> so listen, this has never been litigated before, am i -- >> it has not. >> that's true. >> that's not the limit of emolument. that's the type of an emolument. it's not limited to holding on office. holding an office in the united states at the same time as
holding an office in a foreign country is not what they were talking about. they're talking about benefits earned from foreign governments. business transactions or otherwise. >> richard, let me ask you this, let me say that i stay at trump international in d.c. and i pay $491 for a room. the person in the next room is a diplomat from bahrain. why is my hotel bill a business transaction and hers a violation of the constitution, richard? >> both are business transactions, a person holding a position of trust with the united states government should not be making money on business transactions with foreign governments. there's too much of a potential for corruption there. the founders were very worried about that. they weren't going to say you can't take bribes from foreign governments, they can't prove that. they wanted to have a proffer active provision in the
constitution that you don't receive emolument, benefits, the latin term. >> you're saying not a certain kind of emoluments. all kinds. i have to get a break in. could this lawsuit force the president to release his tax returns? it's a tangle of multiple symptoms. ♪ ♪ trintellix (vortioxetine) is a prescription medicine for depression. trintellix may start to untangle or help improve the multiple symptoms of depression. for me, trintellix made a difference. tell your healthcare professional right away if your depression worsens, or you have unusual changes in mood, behavior or thoughts of suicide. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. trintellix has not been studied in children. do not take with maois. tell your healthcare professional about your medications,
including migraine, psychiatric and depression medications to avoid a potentially life-threatening condition. increased risk of bleeding or bruising may occur especially if taken with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners. manic episodes or vision problems may occur in some people. may cause low sodium levels. the most common side effects are nausea, constipation and vomiting. trintellix did not have significant impact on weight. ask your healthcare professional if trintellix could make a difference for you.
kellyanne conway say people don't care if trump ever releases his tax returns. but that's not what the poles are showing. gentlemen, welcome back. noah, you know, you plan to use this lawsuit to force president trump to release his tax returns. is that what this case is really all about? >> it's not. this case is really about ensuring that he complies with the constitution, and ensuring he makes decisions for the right reasons. however, if we're going to be successful, if we're going to establish what foreign payments he is taking and if a court is going to be able to make a decision and tell him he needs to stop taking those illegal
payments, we're going to have to know what they are. and right now, we don't have a comprehensive account of what donald trump's business interests are. a very good way to get a much more comprehensive account? is going to be to look at his taxes. that will be one of the things we're going to be asking for, otherwise, we can't get where we need to go in this case. i did want to mention that richard painter and his counterpart have written up a comprehensive account of the emoluments clause examining the law, and found tremendous legal support for the position we're taking. it's never been resolved by a court, because we've never had a president who has put us in this position. but we're eager -- >> what will the taxes show? >> well, among other things, the
taxes will give us a lot more information about what precisely his business interests are, and where they are, and how they work. we know about some of the foreign payments that he's getting. we certainly have no way of knowing whether we know about all of them or even a substantial portion of them. and his taxes can give us more information about. >> kellyanne conway said people don't care if he releases his taxes. we know that's not true. 74% say he should release his tax returns. including 49% of his own supporters. >> kellyanne conway has been talking about a lot of alternative facts recently. and i think the white house better get the message quickly, that alternative facts are not going to fly with the american people. and donald trump promised to
release the tax returns, many, many times he promised to release the tax returns as soon as this audit was done. and i think the american people are going to hold him accountable for that promise. that's not what this lawsuit is about, this lawsuit is about the emoluments, the unconstitutional payments to the president, the tax returns may very well tell us what those payments are. there are other ways to get that information. but the real facts are the american people were promised those tax returns and they're entitled to them, and he ought to live up to his promises. >> if the irs is auditing president trump's practices, as he and his people continue to claim, they have shown no evidence to that effect. and president trump is in charge of the u.s. now, is that a conflict? >> sure, i would think that that would be a specific party, particular matter for trump to weigh-in on the irs with respect to an audit, and he should recuse himself from anything like that.
you know, i -- i'm not sure i understand exactly the position. noah says this suit is about the tax returns, richard says it isn't. i'd like to -- if i could go back to one provision. >> i have 30 seconds, if you can do it then i would appreciate it. >> they make a claim that the trump is in violation of what's referred to as the domestic emoluments clause, the president can't be compensated by a federal government or a state government, in excess of his set salary. and if their interpretation is correct. president obama was in violation of it for receiving interest on treasury securities he owned. that's an example of the quality of this complaint. >> no, we're not claiming that at all. >> you are. >> with respect to foreign government bonds. not at all, this is about business deals. this season the about securities you buy on an open market. >> look at paragraph -- >> i have to go. >> this is about business
transactions. when we come right back, a wealthy businessman, reality tv star runs for office, does that sound familiar? wait until you see who it is. next. audi pilotless vehicles have conquered highways, mountains, and racetracks. and now much of that same advanced technology is found in the audi a4. with one notable difference... ♪ the highly advanced audi a4, with available traffic jam assist. ♪
just checking my free credit score at credit karma. what the? you're welcome. i just helped you dodge a bullet. but i was just checking my... shhhhh... don't you know that checking your credit score lowers it. just be cool. actually, checking your credit score with credit karma doesn't affect it at all. are you sure? positive. huh, so i guess i could just check my credit score then. oh! check out credit karma today. credit karma. give yourself some credit. sorry about that.
be the you who doesn't cover your moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. be the you who shows up in that dress. who hugs a friend. who is done with treatments that don't give you clearer skin. be the you who controls your psoriasis with stelara® just 4 doses a year after 2 starter doses. stelara® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before starting stelara® tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. always tell your doctor if you have any signs of infection, have had cancer, if you develop any new skin growths
or if anyone in your house needs or has recently received a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to stelara® or any of its ingredients. most people using stelara® saw 75% clearer skin and the majority were rated as cleared or minimal at 12 weeks. be the you who talks to your dermatologist about stelara®. you probably know my next
>> there has been that analogy. but i tell you why it's not a good -- obviously trump and i have some notoriety on reality television. but here is where this is different. i am actually an immigrant. i am half lebanon knees and half irish. if canada was building walls i wouldn't exist. canada is an inclusive country. it's got two languages, it's french and english. it's different than the united states. but we're the largest trading partner of the u.s. we've had a relationship with the u.s. for over 100 years. 38 states represent the largest trading partner that they have as canada.
so -- all of a sudden trump gets elected and he is way out of sync with our number one trading partner and canadians are very concerned now. and i'm one of them. >> you're talking about justin true dough, the current prime minister. since you mentioned trading, let's talk about nafta. donald trump has said he's going to dismantle nafta. you saw what he did with tpp today. he withdrew. are you concerned about how it will affect your country? >> very concerned. specifically, i listened to all the data coming out of the white house today because i'm obviously an investor globally. nafta is a big deal for me. what i heard the president say through his press secretary was,
i'm willing to negotiate within the confines of the agreement with canada and mexico. if i don't like that agreement, i'm tearing that up, too. so, he's looking at leverage. our country should be working together. let me give you an example. energy independence says you nokan da is one of the rich est countries on earth in natural resources. that excel pipeline we tried to build with obama cost shareholders up in canada $3.2 billion of failed initiatives for eight years. basically we got screwed around. i'm not happy about that. but i'd be happy to sit down with trump and renegotiate because i know he wants ownership and royalties. but that pipeline should allow the energy that's going to flow through it which gives security to every american and we're partners on this thing. we don't want to pay taxes on that. that should be a tax-free pipeline because it's a national interest to supply north american with energy. that's the kind of deal i'm worried about now that nafta is getting organized this way. soft wood lumber, another big deal for us, military procurement, we spend billions
of dollars buying weaponry because we're a partnership militarily. we need to keep our relationship open and we're good for 9 million american jobs in 38 states. >> is this why you said that we meaning canada need a leader who can actually deal with trump? >> i think globally, not just in the u.s. or canada, but look at britain and even colombia and south america. the body politic has decided that they would like people that have some executional experience. execution alex lens as it were. business leaders that make goals, set goals, get things done. that's what you do in business. that's how you define success. all of a sudden the traditional politician is not the favorite out come in many situations and i think that's going to happen in canada, too. i can't believe my country of canada, with the boundless resources it has, has to fudge itself into $1.5 trillion of debt. i have two kids, one is 20, one
is 23. there is no way i'm going to let justin trudeau do that. >> he's popular in canada. do you think you can beat him in 2019? >> there is such an amazing thing when you fall in love, particularly in politics. the first year is euphoria, then reality strikes. i don't know if you've been watching lately, probably not, but the canadian polls for justin trudeau are starting to fall. many people he's not getting stuff done he promised. he promised a $20 billion deficit and clear it up in 2019. we're over 38 billion. we're getting nervous. we're not happy with the performance metrics. that's the same thing that happened stateside. all of a sudden america said i want somebody in here, all the flaws he's got, that can get stuff done. and wow, in this 24-hour cycle, you have to admit trump has really got into his agenda. i've never seen this kind of speed. >> yeah. what did you think about he's
had a rocky start in his first full day. you say he's gotten into his agenda and done a lot. quickly, what do you think, how is he he doing? >> i think you have to leave the whole style thing alone and just measure the performance. i mean, trump is an unusual candidate no question about it. i like everybody else was amazed at what happened. but i think you have to give him his 100 days and see what happens. and i think he's going to perform well, which makes me nervous for canada because we need to sit down. i understand we're going to start negotiating with him next week. >> performing well, that's dpood for the u.s. but listen, if you do win and when you run, i mean during the 2019, come back to us and if you win make us your first stop. thank you. >> thank you. >> all right. when we come right back, millions of people around the world marched against president trump this weekend. but is it a moment or a movement and what will they do next? oh, look! we've got fees ew, really?
oh, it's our verizon bill look at them. line access fee, administrative fees, there are even taxes on top of them. decent people shouldn't have to live like this did i get it? t-mobile ends surprise fees and taxes that's right, with t-mobile one, taxes and fees are now included 4 lines, 40 bucks each. all unlimited, all in.
va is it a he moment or a movement? this is cnn tonight. i'm don lemon. millions of women along with men and children taking to the streets of cities across the country and around the world, but will the people who marched on saturday still be fighting for change tomorrow or the day after or the day after? plus, president trump's first few days in office didn't exactly go accordingo