Skip to main content

tv   Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer  CNN  February 14, 2017 3:00pm-4:01pm PST

3:00 pm
happening now, broken trust. the white house says president trump asked for michael flynn's resignation after he lost confidence in his national security adviser. tonight, members of both parties are demanding investigations into flynn's contacts with russia, his misleading statements and president trump's response. 18 days. the white house confirms the president was warned nearly three weeks ago that flynn wasn't telling the truth. what changed between then and now. and why was flynn allowed to stay on the job? russian provocation. moscow deploys spy ships and missiles even as u.s. relations with the kremlin are under scrutiny. is vladimir putin trying to test president trump in new ways tonight? and inside north korea. we have a live report from kim
3:01 pm
jong-un's capital as his regime makes new advances toward producing a nuclear weapon that could strike the u.s. we want to welcome our viewers in the united statess a and aro the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news tonight. growing momentum for new investigations into michael flynn's contacts with russia, as the white house confirms the president knew for nearly three weeks that flynn wasn't telling the truth. press secretary sean spicer says mr. trump finally asked for flynn's resignation as national security adviser overnight because of a lack of trust. he says the white house counsel determined flynn did nothing illegal by discussing sanctions with the russian ambassador to the united states before mr. trump took office and then denying it happened. tonight, a white house official tells cnn the fbi interviewed
3:02 pm
flynn in the early days of the new administration about his phone calls with the russian ambassador, and that could raise the legal stakes for flynn as lawmakers push for new investigations. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell now says it's highly likely that the intelligence committee will look into flynn's russian contacts. some democrats want a broader investigation, and they want flynn to testify about the trump administration's relations with moscow. questions have been raised about whether the president instructed flynn to discuss sanctions with russia. the white house flatly denies that. as for the president, he hasn't said anything publicly about the exploding scandal, despite multiple appearances today. he did tweet earlier suggesting that leaks to the news media are the real story. i'll talk about all of that and more, with senator mark warner, he's the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee. he's standing by live along with our correspondents and analysts as we bring you all the news
3:03 pm
that's breaking right now. let's begin with our senior white house correspondent, jim acosta. jim, there's a lot of ground to cover on this breaking story. first, what are you learning about the fbi interview with michael flynn? >> reporter: well, we are told, wolf, that the fbi did interview michael flynn, the national security adviser, when he was still at his post in the early days of the administration. not clear yet what the fbi did with that investigation or with that information that they drew out of that interview, but the white house laid out its version of events today, wolf, surrounding the resignation after national security adviser michael flynn, after senior administration officials told reporters that flynn stepped down on his own. the white house now says president trump asked for flynn's resignation. press secretary sean spicer said the white house was contacted by the justice department on january 26th about its concerns regarding flynn's conversations with the russian ambassador. spicer says white house counsel don mcgann immediately briefed the president on the matter.
3:04 pm
all of that means the president has known about all of this for nearly three weeks. still, spicer says it was yesterday when the president finally lost confidence in flynn. >> he needs to rely on a national security adviser to give him advice and i think at a certain point, that guidance, t that trust eroded and the president as he does on all matters ultimately decides when he's ready to make a decision, he execute executes. >> reporter: now, getting back to white house official confirming that the fbi did interview flynn in the early days of the administration, we should point out that was before the justice department warned the white house about flynn's contacts with the russian ambassador and wolf, another wrinkle in all of this, we are told it wasn't until february 9th that the vice president was made aware of the justice department's concerns, of course, that is very important because the vice president vouched for michael flynn during that appearance on cbs during the transition, but the white house insists tonight, wolf, that pence was not being kept out of the loop.
3:05 pm
wolf? >> pretty surprising that he was, in fact, out of the loop until february 9th for all practical purposes. jim, what about spicer? what did he say about whether flynn intentionally lied or misled about the information to anyone inside the white house? >> reporter: i think it's a key question, wolf, because they repeatedly said today the reason why flynn wases let go, or forced to resign,s was that he misled top officials inside this administration including the vice president, but sean spicer said time and again that while he had misled top officials at the white house, he would not say whether or not flynn had intentionally misled officials. here's what he had to say. >> are you saying that the national security adviser was intentionally misleading the president, the vice president, yourself, when he made these comments to -- >> no, look, the trust is given by the president. it's a relationship between he and any individual. and so as i mentioned in the
3:06 pm
comments, maybe it was because -- i don't know that it was intentional. he may have just forgotten. i think at some point, trust isn't just -- >> forget the conversation -- >> that's the point, jim. at some point, that trust eroded to a point where the president did not feel comfortable with him serving in that position and asked for and received his resignation. >> reporter: now, the president has not commented on the departure of his national security adviser today. he was asked about it during one photo opportunity, wolf. he declined to comment on it. the only response from the president today came in the form of a tweet that slammed the leaks coming out of this administration to the press, wolf. it may be valentine's day but you cannot feel the love around here. officials contradicting officials. different stories coming from officials as to what happened and still more questions for this president. he has a news conference with the prime minister from israel, benjamin netanyahu tomorrow. perhaps tomorrow we'll hear from the president. >> jim acosta, thank you. tonight we're also learning
3:07 pm
more about the typeliimeline of events, the exact state donald trump was warned michael flynn might be vulnerable to russian blackmail. our justice correspondent pamela brown is joining us to break it down for us. the situation escalated weeks ago on january 26th, right? >> that's right, wolf. the white house saying today for the first time the president has known for several weeks now that his national security adviser, michael flynn, was withholding the truth about his conversations with the russian ambassador and tonight we have learned from law enforcement sources that the fbi interviewed flynn before that warning weeks ago from the justice department to the white house. tonight, cnn has learned the fbi interviewed michael flynn in the early days of the trump administration. on january 26th, the white house says it was first warned by the justice department that flynn misled the president and top administration officials about his communications with the russian ambassador. at the same time, the top official at justice also told the white house counsel she was
3:08 pm
concerned that the national security adviser was potentially vulnerable to russian blackmail because of his denial. >> the president was informed of this. he asked the white house counsel to reveiew the situation. the first matter was whether there was a legal issue. we had to review whether there was a legal issue, which the white house counsel concluded there was not. >> reporter: but it wasn't until nearly three weeks after hearing from the justice department that the white house says president trump asked flynn to step down following news reports last night of doj's warning and his reds ig nation letter to the president flynn wrote "unfortunately because of the fast pace of events i inadvertently briefed the vice president-elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the russian ambassador. i have sincerely apologized to the president and vice president." back in december, flynn had the conversations in question with the russian ambassador around the same time the u.s. was imposing sanctions fenintense
3:09 pm
russia for its interference in the u.s. election. january 15th, vice president mike pence defended flynn saying unequivocally he had not discussed sanctions. >> what i can confirm having spoken to him about it, those conversations that happened to occur around the time that the united states took action to expel diplomats, had nothing whatsoever to do with those sanctions. >> reporter: 11 days later, doj alerted the white house flynn was withholding the truth. a discovery the fbi made during a broader ongoing probe of ties between trump surrogates and russian officials. more than two weeks after that, the "washington post" published an article saying sanctions were discussed. president trump was asked about the arldticle aboard air force one. >> what do you make of reports general flynn had conversations with the russians about sanctions before you were sworn in? >> i don't know about it. i haven't seen it. what report is that? >> reporting he talked to the ambassador of russia before you were inaugurated --
3:10 pm
>> i haven't seen that. i'll look at that. >> was he aware of a "washington post" story, he hadn't seen that at the time. of course he was involved. >> reporter: today the white house is putting the blame on the justice department. >> this idea of why did it take so long, i think the first question should be where was the department of justice in this? >> reporter: so it's still unclear what happened in that gap of time of doj finding out about the flynn calls and alerting the white house, but what's also still unclear is what changed between january 26th when the white house was warned, and trump asking for flynn's resignation yesterday. other than the news reports. wolf? >> all right. pamela, thank you. pamela brown reporting. also tonight, quite a few senate republicans are now supporting an investigation into michael flynn's contacts with russia. let's bring in our senior congressional reporter manu raju. you had a chance to speak with the senate majority leader, mitch mcconnell. >> reporter: yes i did, wolf, about the idea of investigating exactly what happened here and mcconnell made clear he supports this investigation that's happening in the senate intelligence committee right now
3:11 pm
about russia and russia's meddling in the elections but also saying that that is a venue in which the michael flynn's contacts with the russian ambassador will also be explored. take a listen to what he had to say. >> are you confident that president trump did not direct mike flynn to talk about the issue of sanctions with the russian ambassador? >> look, i -- you'll have to ask those -- the white house those kinds of questions. i think the fundamental question for us is what is our involvement in it and who ought to look at it? and the intelligence committee is already looking at russian involvement in our election. senator blunt has indicated it is highly likely they want to take a look at this episode as well. they have the broad jurisdiction to do it and any questions as to why the president did what he did ought to be directed to the white house. >> reporter: now mcconnell made clear he does not support a separate bipartisan committee to
3:12 pm
look into this. something that is inkbent depenf the existing committees in congress. that's what a lot of democrats are calling for. he did go further than paul ryan, the house speaker who i asked today do you think the american public deserves to know whether trump directed flynn to talk to the russian ambassador about sanctions? he would not go there other than saying it was a right decision for flynn to step down, wolf. >> also today, manu, the house oversight government reform committee chairman jason chaffetz sent a letter to the white house chief of staff, reince priebus, asking questions about the handling of sensitive information at the mar-a-lago club in palm beach over the weekend. what can you tell us about that? >> reporter: yeah, of course, this came after our colleague reported over the weekend that after that north korea missile test that the japanese leader as well as trump talking in this public setting about information, appearing to be talking about this missile test
3:13 pm
in this public setting. this has raised a lot of concerns about whether or not there was any discussion of classified material, whether any of these classified discussions were, protocols were breached in any way. jason chaffetz sending this rather pointed letter to reince priebus asking for a number of things including an explanation of whether proper security protocols were followed. he wanted to know the specific documents they were looking at at the dinner, looking at it on flashlights and whether there was any classified information discussed. now the white house has said there was no classified information discussed, but chaffetz, a republican, who actually has been resistant to investigate other aspects of the trump administration, believes this is one area to push on, so we'll see if the trump white house complies and if it does not comply, what does he do then? does he subpoena, does he call for hearings? we don't know yet. a first step in a process, but a sign that that move by the trump -- by trump on the eve of his first foreign policy crisis has caused some concern on capitol hill. wolf? >> all right, manu. thank you.
3:14 pm
manu ra jurks reporti raju reporting from capitol hill. let's bring in the vice chairman, mike warner of virginia. senator, thanks for joining us. >> yes, wolf, you actually can't believe all this stuff. it is pretty remarkable, isn't it? >> it certainly is. i know you've been briefed. you got a lot more information than we have. talk a little bit about what you've learned, i know there's sensitive information, classified information. but do you think that the former national security adviser, michael flynn, acted alone when he spoke with the russian ambassador about sanctions? >> well, we don't know the answer to that. first thing we've got to look at is the transcript of what happened between flynn and the russian ambassador. then you got to back up from that, assuming that it is what the press has reported is accurate and there was a discussion about taking off the sanctions, and remember, this was coming immediately after the obama administration had put on sanctions because of the massive
3:15 pm
russian intervention in the election. that raises huge concerns, to me. then you've got the series of questions of what did the president know, did he know about it beforehand, did he instruct him? how was the vice president informed or not informed or was he left basically to hang out to dry and had to put forward positive comments about flynn without knowing what's going on? this gets more and more complicated. it's one of the reasons why this investigation that we're conducting is so important. we're looking at russian intervention in terms of false information and fake news. we're looking at russian intervention in terms of selective leaking of hacked information from the dnc and john podesta's e-mails and most importantly, we're looking at actions between potential contacts from the trump organization or the trump campaign and russian agents both before the election and after the election as we see in the case of mr. flynn. >> have you actually seen, read the transcript of what flynn
3:16 pm
told the russian ambassador in washington on that day when the obama administration launched those sanctions against russia and expelled 35 russian diplomats? >> we have not seen the transcripts yet. i know we will see them and frankly we should have seen them by now in terms of normal reporting of counterintelligence. one of the reasons we've not seen them is something i need to get to the bottom of as well. >> were there also, as far as you know, encrypted communications between flynn and the russian ambassador in addition to the phone conversations? >> i'm not going to comment on the type of intelligence we may have, but i would say this, anybody with even a basic security clearance should understand that if they're talking to somebody at the russian embassy, chances are that conversation is monitored. >> explain what you know about the potential for the russians supposedly to be able to blackmail michael flynn because that was the warning the justice department gave the white house when they brought that
3:17 pm
information to the white house counsel. >> well, i don't want to speculate, but there are a couple of different options e s here. you may have the case of where mr. flynn did not represent truthfully to the american public, we don't know what he said to the president about the nature of his conversation with the russian ambassador. we also have, in my mind, a number of unanswered questions about general flynn's contacts and relationships with r.t. news which is an organ of the russian disinformation campaign. we've got questions about general flynn's visit to moscow where he was seated next to leader putin. there are a series of questions and the russians are experts at trying to get compromising information about an individual and using that for their intelligence purposes. now we don't know whether that's happened in terms of general flynn, but it is clearly far of this investigation and should give us all a great deal of pause. >> do you know how much he was paid to make that trip to russia
3:18 pm
for r.t., that russian tv station? and when he had that dinner seated next to putin in moscow? he went on a paid speaking engagement, if you will. >> wolf, these are all things we've got to get to the bottom of, and that's one of the reasons why we already have asked the fbi, the cia, director of national intelligence, the nsa, to give us all the relevant information. we've got a team looking through that information right now, but virtually every day we hear new information, we hear new facts that come to light. we've got to get to the bottom of this as quickly as we can, and let me guarantee the american public, we're going to make as much of this public as possible because the american public deserves to have these answers. >> flynn, himself, insists he crossed no lines. today the white house press secretary sean spicer said general flynn did not do anything wrong and that he was well within his duties to have these kinds of conversations. does that concern you that the
3:19 pm
white house seems to be more focused right now on leaks to the news media than the actions of flynn? >> let's let the justice department make that adjudication of whether what general flynn did was appropriate or not. all i know is this, that the then-president of the united states, president obama, put sanctions in place to go after russia for their unprecedented intervention in our elections. to have at that point a private citizen in effect contact the russians and in effect ftry to undermine those sanctions, that raises huge concerns to me. again, the justice department will have to make the judgment, but that does not sound appropriate in any size, shape or form to me. >> senator, cnn now reporting that the vice president didn't learn that general flynn had misled him until february 9th, that's 14 days after the president was told and according to our reporting, the vice
3:20 pm
president only learned about this because of the public news reports that coming out. we did some checking, february 9th is when the "washington post" broke the story. are you concerned that the vice president appears to have been kept in the dark about all of this? >> wolf, we've got to find that out as well. i mean, the unfortunate thing is if the vice president who put his credibility on the line by defending general flynn when it was clear that flynn knew that was not accurate and it may be clear the president knew that was not accurate, really raises a whole host of additional questions that i think, again, we need to get to the bottom of. and i would think the administration, if they want to remove this cloud that's over the whole administration in terms of these contacts and ties with russia, they need to cooperate with this investigation in every way because we've got a lot of questions that we need answered as policymakers, and quite honestly, the american people deserve answers, too. >> are you going to call on general flynn to testify?
3:21 pm
>> we first of all have to make sure that the transcript verifies what the press has reported but if the transcript verifies that information, i think it's absolutely appropriate that general flynn testify before our committee. >> senator, stand by. there's more information coming into "the situation room." we'll continue our conversation right after this. boost it's about moving forward not back. it's looking up not down. it's feeling up thinking up living up. it's being in motion... in body in spirit in the now. boost. it's not just nutrition. it's intelligent nutrition. with 26 vitamins and minerals and 10 grams of protein. all in 3 delicious flavors. it's choosing to go in one direction... up. boost. be up for it.
3:22 pm
3:23 pm
3:24 pm
tech: at safelite, we know how busy your life can be. mom: oh no... tech: this mom didn't have time to worry about a cracked windshield. so she scheduled at and with safelite's exclusive "on my way text" she knew exactly when i'd be there, so she didn't miss a single shot. i replaced her windshield giving her more time for what matters most. tech: how'd ya do? player: we won! tech: nice! that's another safelite advantage. mom: thank you so much! (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company.
3:25 pm
with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. we're back with senator mark warner, the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee. we're following the breaking news on the ouster of the national security adviser, michael flynn. senator, i want you to stand by for a moment. we're learning some more now about new and very provocative actions by russia challenging president trump, even as his
3:26 pm
relationship with moscow is under enormous scrutiny right now. i want to go to our chief national security correspondent, jim sciutto. jim, what are you learning? >> two provocative step, wolf, both mill staitary steps, one, is crucial, deployment of a new type, more advanced cruise missile, this is a cruise missile the u.s. believes violates an existing arms reduction treaty between the u.s. and russia. it was tested during the obama administration, but this is the first time it's actually been deployed. at the same time, russia deploying a spy ship close to the u.s. coast, both of these signals being read as challenges to the trump administration. tonight, national security adviser michael flynn's resignation is raising new questions about the trump administration's ties to moscow. in particular, when flynn spoke with the russian ambassador about u.s. sanctions, was he acting on orders from higher up? >> did general flynn do this by himself? if he didn't do it by himself, who directed him to engage the
3:27 pm
russians? >> reporter: and did any direction go as high as the president, himself? >> it certainly begs the question of whether flynn was doing exactly what the president wanted. whether he was doing it with the president's knowledge, with the president's approval. >> reporter: today white house spokesman sean spicer said emphatically, no. >> no, absolutely not, no, no, no. but that -- no. >> reporter: still, the fbi is now leading multiple investigations of current and former trump advisers and ties to russia including a year-long investigation of former trump campaign chairman paul manafort and his alleged connections to pro-putin figures in ukraine. and alleged meetings between former trump adviser carter page and russian individuals under u.s. sanctions. m manafort and page denied any wro wrongdoing. the fbi continues to investigation a 35-pace dossier compiled by a former british intelligence agent alleging russia has compromising personal and financial information about donald trump. cnn was first to report on
3:28 pm
friday the intelligence agencies have now corroborated aspects of the dossier, specifically calls between russian officials and other russia nationals known by u.s. intelligence for sharing information damaging to hillary clinton and helpful to donald trump. former top obama adviser ben rhodes tweeting today "when campaign chairman and national security adviser both resign over russia ties, there is more. manafort and anyone have nothing in common except russia and trump." president trump for his part continues to make public statements seemingly defending vladimir putin telling fox news he respects the russian leader earlier this month. >> putin's a killer. >> a lot of killers, we got a lot of killers, what, you think our country's so innocent? >> reporter: today the white house said the president is, in fact, tough on russia. even if the statements are coming from staff other than himself. >> his ambassador to the united nations nikki haley stood before the u.n. security council on her first day and strongly denounced
3:29 pm
the russian occupation of crimea. >> the president certainly hasn't lacked opportunity to call out russia for provocative actions. recently, we've had a pickup in military activity inside eastern ukraine, the u.s. believes that's being directed by russia and now the deployment of this new cruise missile, both of those things that the president has yet to comment on publicly to criticize publicly from the bully pulpit, wolf, of the white house. >> jim sciutto reporting for us, good report. thanks very much. we're back with senator mark warner, vice chairman of the senate intelligence committee. reacting to jim sciutto's report, is your committee now, democrats and republicans, looking into all those issues that we just discussed? >> wolf, every one of those issues we're looking into, and every one of those issues we're going to follow the facts wherever they lead and the american public deserves answers. in terms of those investigations with some of the individuals that were named, in terms of the fact of why this continual
3:30 pm
efforts of president trump to compliment vladimir putin at every chance, we've never seen an american leader in my lifetime ever treat a russian leader with such kid gloves and now you're seeing potentially putin try to take advantage of this new president. this raises enormous serious concerns in terms of prior relationships, in terms of russian interference, and now in terms of some of these provocative actions. the good news is, and this may be one of the few things where there's still broad bipartisan support, democrats and republicans alike realize that vladimir putin is no friend of the united states. he's got a horrible human rights record and he needs to be viewed as an adversary, not as someone that the president is trying to buddy up with. >> i know you've suggested you may want flynn, himself, to testify before your committee, but you also plan to subpoena his phone, for example, for any
3:31 pm
evidence of conversations he may have had with russians. >> we absolutely expect to get the transcript so we can know the accurate information. again, we're hearing this secondhand. we owe him the obligation to see what was actually said, but if the words that he said reflect some of the news reports, it really raises a whole host of questions. why was he trying to undermine then-president obama's current policy, when did the president know, why did he not inform the vice president and leave the vice president hanging out to dry, making him in effect vouch for him when he knew that was incorrect information? how far back does this go in terms of flynn's contacts with russia and the r.t. news? how much money was exchanged? the list goes on and on, and this is just vis-a-vis flynn. as your reporter just mentioned, there are a series of other individuals that were affiliated with the trump campaign or organization that also have very
3:32 pm
unusual ties to russia. all of which we need to get to the bottom of. >> i just want to repeat the question, though, whether transcripts are one thing but the physical phone could contain other evidence, especially if there were what some are suggesting now encrypted conversations between flynn and the russian ambassador or other russians for that matter. so let me rephrase the question. do you want to actually get ahold of that phone? >> we want to make sure that we have all of the information and, again, as you realize for these devices to work, you have to have encryption on both ends. i'm not going to get into sources and methods on this show or any time that's appropriately kept confidential. >> soinds like yunds like you hf work. we'll be watching it every step of the way. senator warner, thanks very much. >> thank you, sir. there's much more breaking news we're following here in "the situation room." did bad publicity drive donald trump's decision to fire michael flynn? plus the half brother of the
3:33 pm
north korean dictator kim jong-un dies suddenly reportedly under mysterious circumstances. awards than any other car brand. and they received more last year too. and the year before that... wow! and the year before that... in fact, chevy's received more j.d. power initial quality awards than any other car brand, four years in a row. impressive! current qualified lessees can sign and drive this chevy equinox for around $232 a month. plus, find your tag and get an additional $750 lease cash on select equinox vehicles in stock. find new roads at your local chevy dealer.
3:34 pm
with the deduction findingombine superpower of ibm watson? ah! you get more money. that's what you could get. h&r block with watson. get your taxes won.
3:35 pm
i realize that ah, that $100k is notwell, a 103fortune. yeah, 103. well, let me ask you guys. how long did it take you two to save that?
3:36 pm
a long time. then it's a fortune. well, i'm sure you talk to people all the time who think $100k is just pocket change. right now we're just talking to you. i told you we had a fortune. yes, you did. getting closer to your investment goals starts with a conversation. schedule a complimentary goal planning session today.
3:37 pm
we're following the breaking news, the white house now confirmed president trump was confirmed january 26th that michael flynn had not told the truth about his phone call with the russian ambassador to the u.s. mr. trump waited 18 days to
3:38 pm
demand flynn's resignation after deciding he had laost trust in his national security adviser. jim sciutto, the justice departme department, as we say, it informed the white house legal counsel on january 26th that flynn had misrepresented his phone conversation with the russian ambassador, yet flynn remained on his job, a very sensitive job, for a full 18 days before resigning last night under pressure, under orders from the president. wasn't until public news reports began to emerge that the white house took action. did bad publicity drive the president's decision? >> listen, it's a fair question, sean spicer's answer to that question from the podium today was we were doing due process, in effect, that we had to explore every end of this, first we eliminated that there was a legal problem then it became clear over time that it was sort of a critical mass of this being a trust problem, but there's still some hard questions about that because it didn't really come to a head until it appears
3:39 pm
they got a phone call from the "washington post" that they're about to go with the story, to go public about this and that was -- seemed to be -- or at least that happened at the same time as there was an acceleration in the decision to push him out. now, is it also possible just the president decided with the wealth of evidence before him that he couldn't stand this anymore? it's possible, but the timing certainly raises questions. >> ryan, ryan lizza, some have suggested that flynn's context with the russians were directed from the president, himself. the white house has denied that accusation. is there any evidence to support that theory? >> none that i've seen yet, but it is the obvious question sort of hanging over the whole chronology here because, wolf, as you -- i think you pointed this out before, in yf you go b to december, the crucial period here that sparked this entire episode on december 29th, the former president, barack obama,
3:40 pm
publicly made known what the sanctions against russia were going to be for the election hacking. that included the, you know, expulsion of the diplomats and closing of two compounds. as soon as he announced that, the entire russian system put out statements saying that they would respond in kind. the foreign minister, the foreign minister spokesperson, vladimir putin's own spokesperson, the twitter feed of the russian embassy in america, they all said we will respond in kind and laid out very specific steps they would take. well, by the following morning east coast time, afternoon in russia, vladimir putin shocked everyone and said, no, he was not going to do any of that. so what happened in between obama's announcement and putin's pullback? well, that's when michael flynn was talking to the russian ambassador and had some half a dozen phone calls at least that we know about so far and that's why everyone suspects, of course, that there was some kind
3:41 pm
of discussion of these sanctions made, that may have influenced putin's decision and of course that's why lots -- as your question indicated, many people are asking, well, if that happened did he, indeed, do that at the direction of the president? now, there's a lot of speculation embedded in what i just said and that's why it needs to be investigated and we need to get to the bottom of what was the true nature of those phone calls. >> and it was followed, don't forget, the next day by a tweet from the president-elect at that time congratulating putin for his decision saying he's also a very, very smart guy. >> exactly. >> there you see it, "great move on delay by v. putin, i always knew he was very smart." all right, jeffrey, sean spicer insisted the president's decision to ask for flynn's resignation was based purely on a lack of trust, not on the possibility flynn could be in any sort of legal trouble for his actions. is that an accurate statement? >> well, it's -- i mean, it's
3:42 pm
really preposterous. i mean, it's now quite clear that flynn and the entire trump campaign has been under fbi investigation for quite some time and that's a very significant fact that quite appropriately would be something that donald trump would consider in deciding whether to fire him. there is so much here that we don't know and so much here that cries out for investigation. that doesn't mean, of course, that flynn or anyone else is guilty of any crime, but there is such a great deal of smoke here that any reasonable person would say, look, this calls for continuing investigation and michael flynn would certainly be one of the main subjects of that. >> all right. everyone, stand by. there's more that we need to report on and assess. we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. your path to retirement may not always be clear. but at t. rowe price,
3:43 pm
we can help guide your retirement savings. so wherever your retirement journey takes you, we can help you reach your goals. call us or your advisor t. rowe price. invest with confidence. won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. [he has a new business teaching lessons. rodney wanted to know how his business was doing...
3:44 pm he got quickbooks. it organizes all his accounts, so he knows where he stands. ahhh...that's a profit. way to grow, rodney! visit
3:45 pm
3:46 pm
3:47 pm
we're back with our political, legal and national security experts. we're following the breaking news on michael flynn's resignation as the president's national security adviser. it now looks increasingly likely that the senate will investigate flynn's contacts with russia. rebecca berg, sean spicer, the press secretary, also claimed during today's briefing that the president has been, in his words, incredibly tough on
3:48 pm
russia. what did you make of that statement? >> well, sean spicer's only evidence of that, wolf, was nikki haley and her remarks to the united nations that she made a couple of weeks ago. he didn't point to anything that donald trump has said or done to back up that statement and frankly, any of us would be hard pressed to think of anything donald trump has said or done that has been particularly tough on russia. really, all of it has been from people like nikki haley, or rex tillerson or general mattis in his administration, not from the top of this white house. so i think the question moving forward is going to be what does donald trump do when presented with his first big test on russia? just today we learned that they've used a ballistic missile in violation of a treaty with the united states. is he going to address that issue? and there are going to be more and more tests down the line. will he keep the sanctions in place that were put in place by the obama administration? we don't know the answers that this, but all of that will be a
3:49 pm
lot more telling than anything trump has said to this point, but of course, what donald trump has said to this point has been actually quite positive regarding russia. >> it certainly has been. all right. ryan, the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell says it's highly likely that the senate intelligence committee will, in fact, investigate flynn's contacts with russia. so what might that investigation look like? >> well, i think as senator warner was stating on our air earlier, it all starts with making public the transcripts of the phone calls that are at the center of this drama. you know, it might be that what flynn did is completely innocent, right? that he -- it's not unusual for incoming national security unusual for incoming national security officials to have contacts with important countries. we shouldn't jump to the conclusion just because he talked to the ambassador something unsavory went on. to clear it all up, it starts with letting the public know
3:50 pm
exactly what was said and did he cross a line in those conversations, did he promise anything to the ambassador with respect to sanctions. and, you know, did -- you know, if he didn't, then his only crime is of course lying to his superiors at the white house. but i think that's where -- that's obviously where the investigation has to start and obviously they need to hear from michael flynn. and you might get into some executive privilege issues if they call him to testify. jeff might know this better than me. i don't know if executive privilege actually applies to the period before the president and flynn were in office, but certainly it does with when he was, you know -- after january 20th. >> all right, jeff. what's the answer? >> i think the answer is you need to be the president to be able to assert executive privilege, and so anything before january 20th would not be covered by executive privilege. now, there might be issues with classified information and what the national security agency wants to release.
3:51 pm
they are very sensitive about disclosing the kind of monitoring that goes on. but as for executive privilege, i do think after january 20th there could be some very complicated questions about that. but before i think it's a nonissue. >> hold on, hold on. we're running out of time. i just want to alert our viewers there's new information we're getting, we're about to go inside north korea at a very sensitive time just days after new missile launch that's testing president trump. a live report from pyongyang in north korea. will rippley is standing by. sy . mom: oh no... tech: this mom didn't have time to worry about a cracked windshield. so she scheduled at and with safelite's exclusive "on my way text" she knew exactly when i'd be there, so she didn't miss a single shot. i replaced her windshield giving her more time for what matters most. tech: how'd ya do? player: we won! tech: nice!
3:52 pm
that's another safelite advantage. mom: thank you so much! (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace.
3:53 pm
that $100k is not exactly a fortune. well, a 103 how long did it take you two to save that? a long time.
3:54 pm
then it's a fortune. i told you we had a fortune. get closer to your investment goals with a conversation. why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis.
3:55 pm
getting heartburn doesn't mean i means i take rolaids®. rolaids® goes to work instantly neutralizing 44% more acid than tums® for fast, powerful relief of your worst heartburn. i trust my rolaids®. r-o-l-a-i-d-s spells relief.
3:56 pm
tonight the half brother of the north korean strong man kim jong-un has died suddenly and mysteriously in malaysia. there are substantiated reports he may have been attacked. >> malaysian say they have no suspects in the death of kim jong-nam. he was 45 years old. police tell reuters kim jong-nam took ill at the kuala lumpur airport. they say he felt like someone grabbed or held his face from behind. but he felt dizzy and asked for help at an airport counter. he died on the way to the hospital. analysts are divided over whether kim jong-nam was actually a threat to his younger half brother. there have been some incidents inside north korea recently indicating there is unrest in kim jong-un's inner circle. the north korean leader recently fired his minister of state security. that's a key position in charge of rooting out spies, of interrogating prisoners, and he was responsible for the personal security of kim jong-un. also, there's been a rash of
3:57 pm
high-profile defectors recently from north korea including the number two official at north korea's embassy in london. so, wolf, kim jong-un has dealt with some real turmoil in his inner circle recently and this could be seen as a move to get rid of any potential rival if, in fact, kim jong-un was involved in his half brother's death. wolf? >> quick question, brian. who was supporting and protecting the half brother? >> analysts are saying china was actively supporting kim jong-nam and that they were protecting him. he lived in macau and in beijing. he was known as a playboy and as a gambler, known to frequent the casinos and dance clubs of macau. analysts say there have been rumors the chinese were kind of keeping kim jong-nam in reserve in case something might happen to kim jong-un, but kim jong-nam had been in exile for more than a decade since he was caught in 2001 trying to sneak into japan on a fake dominican passport, trying to go and visit tokyo's disneyland.
3:58 pm
>> i just want to point out to our viewers we've been trying to get in touch, reconnect with will rippley, our correspondent who's now in pyongyang. we've got some technical issues going on. as soon as we reconnect with him, we'll go there. the whole disappearance, the whole death now of this half brother raising all sorts of questions as you accurately point out and it comes at a very sensitive moment in the international relationship with north korea based on its recent ballistic missile test which has the clearly alarmed south korea, clearly alarmed japan and the trump administration as well. >> absolutely, wolf. this is a very, very dangerous time in the korean peninsula. a couple days ago the north korean test fired an intercontinental ballistic missile. it went about 500 kilometers into the sea of japan. condemned of course by the united states, japan, by south korea. the trump administration is viewing this as a very serious matter. this is considered a real test of the trump administration. this is kim jong-un's pattern.
3:59 pm
he does things like this when a new administration takes office. this was a real case as seen by the allies out there and making many of the allies including the south koreans pushing hard for this new missile defense system, which the u.s. and south korea want to install inside south korea. it's called thad. it's designed to shoot missiles like this out of the sky. the chinese and russians have been resisting that. there's a real push now today to deploy that missile system and now this development tonight with kim jong-un's half brother just adding to the intrigue. is there turmoil in the inner circle. big question tonight. >> a lot of people think north korea represents the major national security threat to u.s. at the start of this trump administration. i want to alert our viewers the tens of thousands of northern californians are being allowed back into their homes right now as that potential dam disaster is avoided. once again, at least for now. workers rushed to shore up a
4:00 pm
damaged emergency spillway in the nation's tallest dam amid fears of catastrophic flooding. authorities say the water level at lake oroville is dropping. residents are are being warned the threat could reescalate. a series of storms forecast for later this week. "erin burnett out front" starts right now. "out front," new details about the fbi questioning michael flynn as we're learning the president of the united states knew for weeks flynn lied act his call to a russian ambassador. why didn't he fire flynn sooner? and more breaking news, the government ethics office telling the white house tonight to investigate kellyanne conway. is conway becoming too much of a distraction? and undocumented immigrants now going to churches for refuge, living in fear. let's go "out front."


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on