tv CNN Newsroom CNN March 4, 2017 2:00pm-3:01pm PST
members of his own administration. president trump tweeting, terrible, just found out that obama had my wires tapped in trump tower just before the victory. nothing found this is mccarthyism. he went on to clarify his personal phone was tapped. a spokesman for former president flatly denies the claims saying this -- a cardinal rule of the obama administration was that no white house official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the department of justice. as part of that practice, neither president obama nor any white house official ever ordered surveillance on any u.s. citizen. any suggestion otherwise is simply false. white house correspondent athena jones joins me live near mar-a-lago and cnn crime and justice producer shimon proquepez. what indications are you getting about these allegations at the
white house. >> white house officials in florida and in washington, we've been asking for them to provide any evidence to back up the president's unsubstantiated allegations. we have not received any evidence from them. my colleague, senior white house correspondent jeff zeleny did speak with a senior administration official in washington who said that white house colleagues learned of the president's tweet storm only after he sent them, early this morning. and it's not uncommon for the president to get up and be tweeting early in the morning. today he started around 6:30 a.m. this official pointed to a story on the conservative website, breitbart news that has been circulating in the west wing. that story followed up on comments from radio talk show host mark levin who claimed that president obama worked to undermine trump's presidential campaign and his administration, including through various investigations on russia and the possible ties between rauns and trump associates. this official said that breitbart news story infuriated
the president. and a couple of hours ago the president's social director tweeted out a link to that very same breitbart story. that lends credence to the idea that it was that story that president trump based his tweets on. we haven't heard any official comment from the white house staff. >> shimon, you've been speaking with a former u.s. official with direct knowledge of the investigation. what has been the reaction from the obama team on these wire-tapping claims? >> bigger than just the obama team. this is a former official who has direct knowledge of the fbi and the department of justice investigation. and there's been flat denial. and i'll read you something this person told me. which is -- this didn't happen. it is made up, false. wrong. there was no equivocation. it just isn't like oh, well maybe it happened here or maybe it happened there. or we may have been looking at
something else this person flatly denied that anyone at the department of justice had done this. had gone before a judge, to try and seek some sort of authorization to wire tap donald trump's phones. >> yeah. strong language from the official you spoke with basically saying the claim is false. athena, the top democrat on the house intelligence committee, adam schiff called the allegations outlandish and ba baseless, what are republican lawmakers saying? >> we are seeing some responses from republicans. for instance, south carolina senator lindsey graham had a town hall this morning in south carolina where he talked about this. listen. >> i don't know if it's true or not. but if it is true, illegally -- it would be the biggest political scandal since watergate. so -- it's my job, as united
states senator to get to the bottom of this. >> that sentiment about it being his job to get to the bottom of it, that sentiment is being echoed by other republican colleagues, including senator ben sass of nebraska who put out a statement saying the public needs more information about the president's allegations. he says that if there was wire-tappingings, it was either with or without a warrant from a special court known as a fisa court. if it was without that warrant then the president needs to explain what kind of wire-tap this was and how he knows about it. if it was with the legal court order, he says the president should ask that the application for surveillance be made public. to everyone, or at the very least to the u.s. senate. he went on to say, we're in the midst of a civilization-warping crisis of trust and the president's allegations demand the thorough and dispassionate attention of serious patriots. it's worth restating here,
pamela, what shimon was saying, that former senior officials are saying the idea that then-candidate trump's phones were wire-tapped are just wrong. one official said it was just nonsense. >> shimon, for the fbi to be able to wire-tap someone's phone. a u.s. citizen, it would have to go to the fisa court and prove why that needs to happen. a president can't just order someone's phone to be wire-tapped. which is what donald trump seemed to be saying in his tweet. that president obama ordered this. walk us through that process. >> this isn't something that would come even from the white house or a sitting president. obama in this case. so basically with a would have to happen is the fbi would have to go to the department of justice and the department of justice would have to go before a secret court known as where they do this, the fisa court and ask for permission, for
authorization to tap donald trump's phone. there's some argument about how easy is that. i think in this case and certainly from the source, the official former official with direct knowledge of the investigation, said it would have been tough for them to get this kind of permission. to wire-tap donald trump's phones. the other thing is if there was a criminal investigation, which was being handled by the fbi and the department of justice, they would have had to have shown that there was some sort of criminality to a judge or perhaps some sort of crime was being committed, there were allegations made. would have to go before a federal judge and try to get a warrant. various steps would need to be met before a judge would grant that this kind of authorization. it's a pretty tough burden to meet. it happens every day in federal courts, but i think given who donald trump was at the time, and who he is now, you know, this official stressed it would have been really tough for us to
get this kind of authorization. >> he stressed that it's false, not true. shimon and athena, thank you very much. i twoont bring in my panel, cnn's bob baier, a former c.i.a. operative, betsy woodruff, politics reporter for the "daily beast." bob, we're hearing from former c.i.a. analyst ned price who quit the agency a few weeks ago and donated $5,000 to the democratic party and hillary clinton's campaign last year. he tells cnn that this is either a calculated attempt to distract from the administration's multi-pronged and yet unexplained russian ties, or a fundamental misunderstanding of how intelligence and law enforcement authorities operate, either way. this outburst should frighten all americans. that's what he says, bob, do you agree, disagree, is this a calculated move in your view or misunderstanding or neither of those? what's your take? >> i don't know how much he calculate. but it's ludicrous to think that
obama went to the fbi, got a fisa warrant, fisa court agreed to tap donald trump's phone. first of all, there's no probable cause to ask for it. the fbi would go into full revolt. this would have been leaked. there would be a record of it. which the president could get right now. so it's ludicrous, and i think he's under a lot of pressure, under this russian, this russian thing which we still don't know what it is. and he's striking out against obama. to say his phones were tapped, you know, i would bet the ranch on it, they weren't. it's impossible. getting a fisa warrant is extremely difficult on a presidential candidate -- no way. i think he's lashing out. as he has been for so long. >> and betsy, he's not only saying that his phone was tapped, but also that the former president was responsible for it. i mean if this was true this would be a megascandal.
an affair with watergate -- we still haven't heard from the white house. it's been nearly 12 hours. what do you think about that? what should be said and what's your expectation? >> right. well to use a hallowed journalism cliche, these are what we call bombshell allegations in the big "if true" category. and the fact that the white house isn't supporting president trump in the twitter comment he made is telling. it suggests there may not be a "there" there. i think the larger issue that this points to is that the president doesn't seem to have a very sophisticated understanding of the way the intelligence community works. of course, president obama could not have asked a fisa court to authorize wire-tapping, that's not how it works. that's not how you get a fisa authorization. >> and the fbi can't do that, either. >> exactly. there's just no reason to think that this is specifically what happened. and this isn't the only example of trump and his team not seeming to know some of the
stuff that most folks who work in this world know about intelligence-gathering. for instance there's a lot of panic about the fact that leaked that mike flynn spoke with the russian ambassador. but in the intelligence community, it's common knowledge that the russian ambassador was being wire-tapped. that many ambassadors in the u.s. has fraught relationships with, those guys are getting wire-tapped. if you're an intelligence official and you call them, someone is probably listening to your call. the fact that trump, his own former national security adviser didn't seem to understand that, just points to what we've been talking about, the fact that the understanding of these issues is fairly thin. >> all of this comes on the heels of president trump's widely praised speech before congress on tuesday. let's watch that. >> the time for small thinking is over. the time for trivial fights is behind us. we just need the courage to share the dreams that fill our hearts. the bravery to express the hopes
that share our souls. >> so julian, does his predawn twitter storm wipe out that positive balance? i mean how do these unsubstantiated wire-tapping allegations affect the general public's perception of their new president? >> i think it was probably too much to make an argument that that address represented some pivot to a new donald trump. president trump is the same person he's always been and i think the tweets this morn respect much more of the kind of politician he's become. these are unsubstantiated claims. we're not hearing there's a lot of evidence behind what he's accused the former president of doing and the irony that he ends the tweet saying this is mccarthyism. it is, but it's what he's done, rather than what's being done to him this is about distracting people from the discussions of investigation into the russia connections, which have been
front and center all week. and suddenly, the conversation is turning to obama. so this is who president trump is. and i think that speech really didn't reflect the kind of shift people are talking about. >> so, bob, i want to go back to you, because you were a c.i.a. agent. how would anyone prove wire-tapping would take place? isn't the whole point of wire-tapping to keep surveillance covert, under the radar? >> you can't prove it, the implication is that the president went out and sort of a black bag operation with private operatives, you know, it would it involve a break-in? would it involve listening to a cell phone? he wasn't specific. how does he know this? i think he's been citing breitbart. and i read that breitbart report and there's some interesting things in it there's nothing about tapping president's phone. is the breitbart phone, if the fbi did ask for a fisa warrant on a campaign, a guy working for trump, that's something different. why did they do it, what was the
probable cause. but you know, getting into the bottom of this, he's making accusations he cannot prove. >> and just on that note, sorry to cut you off there. he sent this tweet this morning. said he just learned presumably he's not getting an intelligence briefing early on a saturday morning. so it does appear, betsy that this information came from the breitbart report or a right-wing radio talk show host. it appears once again he's relying on the right-wing media reports to make these allegations. the last time i recall it was about sweden in a fox news report it was all about attacks in sweden. do you think this is reckless? >> we know exactly what his media diet is like. he reads a lot of breitbart. he watch es fox and friends. and the reality is that breitbart has a so they record
in reporting things that are factually accurate. they draw lots of criticism for getting stories wrong in the past and in the past when steve bannon was running the site, for refusing to apologize stories that were incorrect. they ran a story about loretta lynch. said she was the loretta lynch named to run the jxtd that was completely wrong. the fact that the president is relying so overwhelmingly on this site for his news about pivotal national security issues and pivotal security issues is unprecedented. it's not the way most presidents get their information about intel and the larger root issue is that the president has long telegraphed an extremely low level of confidence in the american intelligence community. he's extremely skeptical. we know he's often been prone to believing conspiracy theories. believing there are nefarious forces at work that we don't have good information on and that's a level of suspicion and distrust that's very much of a piece that the way breitbart covers these issues.
it makes sense that he would rely on them. it's something that i imagine would give many observers pause. >> stick around. we have more to discuss, we'll be back in just a few. coming up, attorney general jeff sessions set to meet with the president next hour after days of heat about his contact with the russian ambassador. how trump administration is fighting untangle itself from the controversy. up next. you do all this research on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call
for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. we danced in a german dance group. i wore lederhosen.man. when i first got on ancestry i was really surprised that i wasn't finding all of these germans in my tree. i decided to have my dna tested through ancestry dna. the big surprise was we're not german at all. 52% of my dna comes from scotland and ireland. so, i traded in my lederhosen for a kilt. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story. get started for free at ancestry.com.
we're keeping a close watch on mar-a-lago. next hour attorney general jeff sessions will meet with president trump. tonight's meeting comes amid the growing controversy over sessions' changing story of his meetings with the russian ambassador. on monday, sessions is set to amend the testimony he gave before congress, concerning his contacts with the ambassador. all of this after the attorney general recused himself from any investigations into possible ties between russian officials and the trump campaign.
president trump calling the controversy over sessions' testimony quote a witch hunt. and is reportedly angry that sessions recused himself. so let's bring in my panel. bob bear, betsy wood roruff and jeremy salazar. apparently it was a last-minute decision for jeff sessions to join the meeting at mar-a-lago. what do you make of it? >> the way that sessions talked about recusal was wildly different than the way the white house talked about it i believe sean spicer said a few hours before sessions announced the recusal, that he would have nothing to recuse himself from. of course sessions disagreed with that. sessions told reporters on friday that he had been considering or maybe thursday that he had been recusing himself going through the typical doj process for weeks. before the "washington post" story broke so it's likely that will come up. however the larger issue might in fact be the fact that the president is poised at some point or we're hearing this week to release a new executive order
banning travel from certain muslim majority countries so that's definitely going to be a key issue that the white house and the justice department will need to be working on in the coming days. of course they've been saying that executive order was imminent going back for several weeks now so a grain of salt as far as the timing it certainly looks like we might get a new one this week. of course the justice department will be key in defending that executive order from the inevitable legal challenges. >> i have to ask you, julian, sessions recused himself saying because he was part of the trump campaign that it's only appropriate to recuse himself from any trump campaign investigations. do you think his recusal is enough to satisfy democrats? or the critics? >> no, i don't think it is. this point to have the second in command for example. at the justice department conduct this investigation. would not be satisfactory to democrats. nor are many democrats happy with the intelligence committee. run by republicans sympathetic
to the president handling this. so woos why this week you've heard more about the possibility of a special prosecutor or creating some kind of select committee. watergate style committee to launch a full investigation into the connections between russia and trump's advisers. if any existed that affected the election. so i don't think inn him recusing himself is going to end this kind of controversy. i think people are suspicious of the justice department handling this at all at this point. >> we do know, we have reporting that the fbi's counterintelligence division is investigating these ties between trump's associates during the campaign and the russians. when you look at a list of the meetings, bob bear, it's striking how many meetings that were between trump's inner circle and the russian ambassador, kislyak. that they had previously denied and those meetings included tormg jeff sessions, president's
son-in-law, jared curbe er kush. adviser carter page, ousted national security adviser michael flynn. >> meeting with an ambassador, the argument could be made there's nothing wrong with that. but the fact that they denied these meetings, what do you make of that? >> it's the push-back. as a former intelligence officer. the way i'm looking at it is the counterintelligence investigation. tough look at things like motivation. contacts with russia with the kgb, they've accused kislyak of being a kgb agent or possibly a co-optee. which is very important i don't know that, but the c.i.a. would. the fbi would. that needs to be looked into. for me, for any, in any counterintelligence investigation, what you need to look at is the money. is anybody getting paid. is anybody getting business favors. carter page, manafort has been
accused of taking money. in the ukraine, and even people the accusation is circling washington right now as we speak, that trump ultimately borrowed m eed money to support businesses from russia. maybe came through deutsche bank or somewhere else. to get to properly investigate this you have to take it out of the administration select committee or special prosecutor. this is not a partisan you know, view of it. you just have to. you have to get somebody who is neutral to take a look at this. at the end of the day, there may be absolutely nothing there but for a piece of mind in this country, we have to look into it, and somebody we trust. >> to reiterate the point you made, at this point there's no evidence that any of the accusations swirling around are credible. but of course there's an ongoing investigation. bob bear, betsy woodruff, julian sellser, thank you very much for coming on. russia and the trump
administration likely to be a hot topic tomorrow when house minority leader nancy pelosi and senator marco rubio join jake tapper on "state of the union." what shall we call you? tom! name it tom! studies show that toms have the highest average earning potential over their professional lifetime. see? uh, it's a girl. congratulations! two of my girls are toms. i work for ally, finances are my thing. you know, i'm gonna go give birth real quick and then we'll talk, ok? nice baby. let's go. here comes tom #5! nothing, stops us from doing right by our customers. ally. do it right. whoo! look out.
so we know how to cover almost alalanything.ything, even a "truck-cicle." [second man] how you doing? [ice cracking] [second man] ah,ah, ah. oh no! [first man] saves us some drilling. [burke] and we covered it, february fourteenth, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪
so how old do you want uhh, i was thinking around 70. alright, and before that? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? oh yeah sure... ok, like what? but i thought we were supposed to be talking about investing for retirement? we're absolutely doing that. but there's no law you can't make the most of today. what do you want to do? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. yea. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change. investment management services from td ameritrade.
well president trump this morning sending ripples through washington even before the sun came up. a tirade of tweets, one after another, claiming that he had been spied upon. his phones at trump tower tapped, he says, and in those tweets he blames one man by name -- former president barack obama. exactly what trump accused the
former president of overhearing or stealing, we don't know. and since those tweets, there's been no clarification or additional information from the white house. absolutely nothing. democratic leaders in congress outraged, calling the president's claims outlandish and destructive. and republican senator lindsey graham says he's worried that such allegations being made with nothing to back them up. i want to bring in cnn's polo sandoval. senator graham held a town hall this morning right after the tweets came out. what did he say? >> it was a fairly heated town hall and he defense straight into this issue of the latest trump twitter tirade as we heard from lindsey graham who was very skeptical of the latest claims made by the commander-in-chief claiming that the obama administration in some way had tapped into some of his phones at trump tower. of course that's a claim that the administration continues to
deny here. once you hear directly from senator graham about the latest tweets posted by president trump. >> if it is true, illegally, it would be the biggest political scandal since watergate. if the former president of the united states was able to obtain a warrant lawfully, to monitor trump's campaign for violating law. that would be the biggest scandal since watergate. i'm very worried that our president is suggesting that the former president has done something illegally. who is are two scenarios laid out by senator graham at clemson university. russia dominating part of the conversation as well. pamela. the senator, they're saying he supports an increase in sanctions against russia for hacking into some of those dnc emails and topics touched on from veterans' issues and
obamacare and the potential repeal of that, of obamacare. that by the way, pamela, did trigger a lot of boos from the crowd. so a mix of support and opposition in his home state. >> there's been strong support. strong reaction i say across the country when that's brought up at the town halls. polo sandoval, thank you very much. with me, robert zimmerman, a democratic strategist and former hillary clinton fundraiser. also cnn political commentator ben ferguson joining us. robert i'm going start with you, not a word from the white house since these tweets this morning. it's been almost 12 hours. >> these tweets and the startling claims about wire-tapping and the former president behind it. what's your take here? >> one of two scenarios, either the sedatives wore off from the state of the union or another tactic by donald trump it to try to change the focus and change the topic. we've seen that play many times before. his false claims about voter
fraud. bipartisanly rejected. his recent claims about sweden terrorist attack. his false charges about refugees and of course, the original strategy of bringing up the birther lie to try to change the focus and engage in character say sa assassination. you're seeing a bipartisan coalition emerge in congress calling for an independent investigation. some by darrell issa calling for a special prosecutor. because the issue about the contacts between donald trump and his campaign in russia are not going to go away. the intelligence wire taps picked up by europe and american officials, that's one example of them. the signals between wikileaks and the trump campaign is another. and of course the fact that his staff continues to either misstate the facts or continue to lie about their relationships with russian contacts, also just adds to it. >> okay, and we don't just to be clear, we don't know if any concrete links between wikileaks and members of his staff.
we, we do know that the fbi is investigating a lot of the contacts. >> we do, know, pamela. we do know that donald trump encouraged wikileaks to leak information about hillary clinton's emails. he bragged about doing that. >> he did encourage the russians, that is true. during the campaign. he did do that. i want to make sure that we're clear with our audience. but ben, i mean you know, he's -- >> let me say a couple of things here. what george said there was, a brilliant, i think that you know the sky is falling. commentary. not based on facts. the classic example is the last point that he made there that somehow the staff of donald trump was speaking directly with wikileaks, which is, there is no evidence to show that. that is just fear-mongering and i would say misleading the same way you accuse the trump administration of misleading people. second thing is this, let's be clear about something here. there is a very decent chance that what donald trump was implying today, the phones that
were tapped at trump tower, absolutely could have happened. i reason i say this is that you have a former obama speechwrite another said in a tweet that there's a chance while they were investigating russia if those russians were speaking with pawn ma manafort or other people at the campaign. that those actual phone calls could have been tapped and the conversations could have been tapped and the phone numbers they were dialing could have been tapped. there does need to be some clarification here from the white house very soon about this to make it clear. that i do not believe that you know, the president sitting obama would have called for that wire tapping. i do think that that is probably accurate. and what valerie jarrett tweeted out and what the president's spokesman said today. but neither of them denied there was any tap that was ever made that could have covered donald trump, donald trump's tower and his phone lines there. so i think that's where there might be some serious smoke on the story. >> just to be clear, again i got
to be the fact checker here, our shimon proqupez has been speaking to officials who say it was wrong that donald trump's phone was tapped during the election. there's a lot we don't know in terms of wiretaps that could have been part of the investigation. in terms of his phone, which is what he claimed in twitter, there's no evidence about it according to the officials. >> that's the rebound i think the white house needs to clear this. >> it's been 12 hours and they haven't. >> i think if you're donald trump and you find out all of a sudden that there's, apparently phone conversations between possibly you and also your top adviser staff members during your campaign, where a part of a, of a wiretap that involved whoever you were talking to. this isn't a funny matter -- i would be -- >> this is a pathetic matter. >> i would be outraged and furious about this. i think what you saw from the
president is someone who is very upset and angry that somehow his phone calls or staff's phone calls could have been listened to. >> okay. go ahead. robert. >> from any report that we have, the president is basing his twitter outburst between right-wing radio commentator and breitbart. which is a leading perpetrator of fake news. >> let's understand, if i can finish my point, ben. >> let robert finish and i'll go to you, ben. >> let me point out, if in fact president trump's conduct or his staff's conduct was so extreme that it merited a fisa wiretap, which is very, very, very high threshold to get. by the fisa court. very difficult, a very difficult wire tap to get by the fisa courts, all the more reason for us to have a independent special prosecutor to investigate this. to find out about the relationships and to find out most of all why the trump team
continues to lie about their relationships and lie about their meetings. >> it would not be extreme first off for the fisa court to give a wire tap that would cover russian individuals, including the ambassador, including anyone basically working with the russian government. if you look back in history, we've done a heck of a job on surveillance of the russian ambassador, every russian ambassador and almost everybody that's in this country that's representing russia. and you had the president that kicked out many of the people connected with the russian government recently right before he left office and they were under surveillance as well so this idea that somehow this would not have happened or that it is unprecedented for the fisa court to make a decision is absolutely absurd. this would be a very normal -- >> let's take a step back here, ben. because he tweeted it this morning, he said he had just learned about it. so presumably he wasn't involved in intelligence briefing before dawn on a saturday morning. we have reporting that this
breitbart report had been circulating around and that this right-wing radio talk show host had been talking about the breitbart report. and so, it appears that the president tweeted this based on these unsubstantiated allegations and these reports from right-wing media. what -- >> i would. >> can i just point out -- >> i would be -- >> i want to ask, i want to just quickly ask, though, i'll let you say what you want to say. what would you feel comfortable with for the president to have before tweeting out something like this, ben? >> i think if you look at what he probably has seen from this, also if you look at mark lee van who is not a guy who has been accused in his career of putting out false or misinformation, he's a guy -- if you're going to laugh about it then back about it. a hack job attack that you just did. you didn't give a fact here. i've known mark a long time.
he's a lawyer, constitutional lawyer, he's a lawyer that's fought very serious cases, very high up in the u.s. government. and he's won the vast majority of those. >> do you think -- >> he's put out misinformation, you've got to give me an example of it. otherwise you're just being a hack. >> ben, this goes to my -- it's unsubstantiated. in other words there's nothing to substantiate the allegations that president obama was listening in to donald trump's phone calls during the campaign. that's what was being said. it appears the president looked at these reports and tweeted about the allegations in these reports. that so i mean is that appropriate to you? >> look, this is what i would have done. i would have said to the president, mr. president, i think we need to look into this a little bit more and i don't know if you want to say that the president directly obama ordered this or implied that he ordered this. i'm one to say, i'm a realist on this stuff. i don't think the president ordered this. i do think it was under his administration and that is something that would be very
concerning for someone running for president of the united states of america, to have any of their phone calls or some of their phone calls being monitored by the government. that is very concerning. >> and really -- >> robert, i'm going get to you. i want to ask my producers, do we have that sound from the -- from mark talking about this? i would like to play it rather than me paraphrasing what he said. i'll get your reaction. if we could play that sound, guys, that would be great. >> how many phone calls by trump, if any, have been intercepted by the obama administration? and recorded by the obama administration? and all the other transition officials involved in foreign policy. and national security and defense policy? this, ladies and gentlemen is the real scandal. >> robert, your reaction? >> as i said before, my, mark lee van has a litany of lying and spreading false information about hillary clinton, about her record as secretary of state. >> you have to be specific,
then. if you're going to make that accusation. >> if i can finish my point. i would be glad to. his commentary about hillary clinton and for example on the benghazi probe. the claims he made about the clinton foundation. the attacks he made -- >> give me one example. >> you're basing generalities here. >> let him talk, ben. >> let me finish. >> this is a much bigger topic than mark la v.i.n. the fact that he spread false reports about the clinton foundation improperly benefitted or favors granted. the bigger issue is not here of mark lee van. the bigger issue is that russia is materially benefitting from the trump administration. if the donald trump was to clear this up, let him release his tax returns and disclose whether he borrowed money from russia and talk about it and stand up to the russian aggression and put sanctions in place to crack down on russia because they attack our democracy, that's what
donald trump could clearly do if he had any integrity. any commitment to clear up this issue. >> you got, you got -- you know the drill, ben, robert. we're out of time. i'm so sorry. i gave you, i was engineer rouse, too. >> give me one example of mark lee van backing up anything. >> we got to go. but we'll be sure to have you guys back on the show and we can continue the discussion. thank you, gentlemen. as the network it's on. and verizon has been ranked number one for the 7th time in a row by rootmetrics. (man) hey, uh, what's rootmetrics? it's the nation's largest independent study and it ranked verizon #1 in call, text, data, speed and reliability. (woman) do they get a trophy? not that i know of. but you get unlimited done right. (man 2) why don't they get a trophy? (man 3) they should get something. (woman 2) how about a plaque? i have to drop this. my arm's getting really tired. unlimited on verizon. 4 lines, just $45 per line.
unlimited plans with 5gb of high-speed data start at just $45 a month... ...on america's largest, most dependable 4glte networks. straight talk wireless. only at walmart. this i gotta try ldcats 'til we die... bendy... spendy weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct at hilton.com and join the weekenders. well education secretary betsy devos has been outspoken in her support for some controversial education programs. like voucher programs. and florida there are disagreements about whether it's helping students, cnn's laura sanchez reports. >> math, science, social studies. >> for 7-year-old lana mondeley, going to public school was miserable. she had trouble making friends, didn't get enough attention from teachers, and even hated the food.
her grandparents say that almost every day, ended in tears. >> so why are you crying, mommy, i don't like it here, i don't like it. >> so anna and anibal brought their second grader here to kingdom academy just outside miami where lana has flourished. but lana can only attend the school because of a controversial voucher program. one that's been at the center of a heated political battle in florida for 16 years. instead of paying taxes to the state, corporations get dollar-for-dollar tax credits by donating money to organizations like step up for students, who gave many of the 98,000 scholarships to lower-income students, enabling them to go to private schools statewide. >> i don't think that low-income children should have less opportunities than more wealthy children. kids don't get to choose their parents or choose the environment they grow up in.
why do we have all of these opportunities for affluent families and don't have the same opportunities for lower-income families. >> but opponents say it's leaving many students behind? >> we're at the point where we don't have enough books for each kid to take home. >> french teacher calibra reed says by not paying taxes, corporations are robbing public schools of funding. >> if the money that went to vouchers was reinvested into the schools we would have the schools that parents are looking for. and we wouldn't have the need for vouchers. by funneling this money away, it hurts the kids. >> program supporters say there have been eight different independent reports. and several court decisions that show the program does not cost public schools money. still frederick ingram with the state teachers union disagrees. >> you go to many schools in the state of florida, you see the lack of programming. the lack of band classes, the lack of art classes, fewer
vocational classes. you see teachers that are not paid what they need to be paid for doing the work that they do. >> >> reporter: despite the politics, there is no debate. >> if i did not have a choice, i would probably have to move to a place where i was able to choose. like i said, when it comes to my children, there is the sky's the limit. i will do whatever i need to relocate and do whatever i need to to make sure their needs are accommodated. >> and that was boris sanchez reporting. we'll be right back. stick around. runs on intel? that ride share? you actually rode here on the cloud. did not feel like a cloud... that driverless car?
i have seen it all. intel's driving...the future! traffic lights, street lamps. business runs on the cloud... and the cloud runs on intel. ♪ i wonder what the other 2% runs on...(car horn) nobody does unlimited like t-mobile. while the other guys gouge for unlimited data... t-mobile one save you hundreds a year. right now get two lines of data for $100 dollars.
with taxes and fees included. that's right 2 unlimited lines for just $100 bucks. all in. and right now, pair up those two lines with two free samsung galaxy s7 when you switch. yup! free. so switch and save hundreds when you go all unlimited with t-mobile. my lineage was the vecchios and zuccolis. through ancestry, through dna i found out that i was only 16% italian. he was 34% eastern european. so i went onto ancestry, soon learned that one of our ancestors we thought was italian was eastern european. this is my ancestor who i didn't know about. he looks a little bit like me, yes. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story. get started for free at ancestry.com
every year cnn heroes honors every day people doing extraordinary work to change lives. >> so proud of you. >> we crossed the globe to tell the stories of these amazing heroes. >> come on, go all the way to the end. >> we can't do it without you. we need you to tell us who you think should be a cnn hero. >> look how far we've come in a week. >> it's fantastic. >> you can nominate someone in just a few simple steps. cnnheroes.com and fill in the form to tell us about your hero. it's that easy. you could help make your hero a cnn hero. shine some light on their amazing work. >> thank you, thank you. >> well, thank you so much for being here with me. i'm pamela brown in washington on this saturday. i'll see you an hour from now live in "cnn newsroom." "smerconish" is next.
"how to win at business." step one: point decisively with the arm of your glasses. abracadabra. the stage is yours. step two: choose la quinta. the only hotel where you can redeem loyalty points for a free night-instantly and win at business. and now we unleash it onwerful your taxes.pecies has created. hello my name is watson. yep. h&r block and ibm watson together. come see us and get your taxes won.
go richard. >> i'm michael smerconish in philadelphia. a softened president trump gave a well received speech to congress but the afterglow was short lived. after a rough week of russian accusations, this morning president trump went on a twitter rant accusing his predecessor of wiretapping trump tower and comparing presidents obama and nixon. now attorney general jeff sessions who met wit