tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN March 6, 2017 8:00pm-9:01pm PST
incredulous, a source says, that's the reaction of james comey to president trump's outrageous twitter charge. he claims president obama ordered a wiretap of his phones during the campaign, without a wit of evidence. president trump signs the travel ban today behind closed doors. plus, where ben carson calls slaves immigrants and went on to say, those slaves had a dream that they might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land. >> let's get right to jessica schneider with more on president trump's shocking wiretap charge?
people on both sides are asking for proof, and it's really bipartisan be wilderment. members are saying they don't have any evidence to back up those wiretapping claims from the president. it's the fbi making the most public push nor clarification. tonight fbi officials are demanding a flat out denial from the justice department, but not yet getting one, this after president trump went on a twitter tie rate saturday. terrible, just found out obama had my wires tapped at trump tower just before the victory. how low has president obama gone to tap my phones. bad or sick guy. sources tell cnn, the fbi asked the doj to refute the claims. only a court can order a wiretap. >> the process to obtain a fisa application. involves many levels of senior loadership review, both within
the requesting agency agency and the department of justice, and ultimately the court. >> so far, the justice department isn't commenting on trump's twitter accusations. some are asking why comey is refraining from issuing his own statement. since he didn't hold back during the 2016 campaign. president obama vehemently denying president trump's charge. neither president obama or any white house official ever ordered surveillance on any u.s. citizen. any suggestion otherwise is simply false. james clapper also denying the allegation. >> for the part of the national security apparatus that i oversaw. there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. >> and at this point you can't confirm or deny whether that exists? >> i can deny it.
>> there is no fisa court order? >> not to my knowledge. >> of anything at trump tower? >> no. >> trump's team isn't buying it. >> sean spicer speaking extensively offcamera, defending the president's tweet, there has been enough reporting that strongly suggests something occurred. continuing by saying lawmakers have a lot to look into. there is information that affects national security that has been leaked out, that concerns him. homeland security secretary kelly in an interview with wolf, backed the president. >> the president of the united states said he has his reasons to say he has some convince iin that needs to take place. >> assigning a special prosecutor is a way to ensure the investigation proceeds impartially. >> in the ongoing house intelligence panel inquiry. leaders are setting an aggressive timetable. sending this letter to the director of national
intelligence. requesting the release of documents and in it person interviews by march 17th. the material to reveal any links between russia and individuals associated with political campaigns. the president is also renewing his calls to probe what he calls pervasive leaks that are undermining national security, that's all accord willing to his press secretary, sean spicer, spicer is still not offering up any proof from the president when it comes to those wiretapping claims. don? >> thank you very much, i appreciate that. i want to turn now to brian salter. brian, good evening to you, allegations from the president like this are explosive, we understand that he was furious about this breitbart article that was passed around the white house. could that lead to the president tweeting such unfounded information, falsehoods on saturday? >> i think so, it's the most logical explanation we have. all starting thursday. >> call that logical. >> yeah, silent cue, this was
the allegation on his opinion radio show. then on friday, there it is oorn breitbart. amplifying it further, adding more detail, picking up on news accounts from months ago, trying to connect the dots in ways that may or may not actually connect. and that article did land on the president's desk and the desks of other white house aids on friday, it's the best explanation for why trump lashed out on saturday. trump used some of the exact same words that are in the breitbart story. it's the best expansion we have for what caused the tweet storm. >> the former -- i mean, the current head of the fbi is incredulous about this. all he had to do was pick up the phone. he wojt say there's no evidence, he would say, i've been told by. >> he could have avoided a weekend's worth of headlines, perhaps these headlines benefit president trump. he gives his loyalists an explanation for what's going on,
this is all obama's fault. every time we're on the air saying, there's no proof obama wiretapped trump, we are repeating the idea that maybe somewhere, somehow this actually happened. there is a problem, almost a psychology in the coverage of the fact checks of the president. but specifically about what's going on here, opinion versus new. it's great to have opinion journalism out there. what they're doing is not real reporting, trying to figure out what actually happened. they're taking stories from elsewhere that have not been corroborated by the cnn's of the world. levin has been coming after me all day saying, why don't you believe the stories about fisa applications? i don't believe them, because cnn, the new york times, washington post, reporters have been trying hard to confirm it, and haven't been able to. >> in there taking a headline that's proof, but no that was
part of the ambassador who is often monitored, that's how flynn got caught. >> it's always fun to go cherry pick, isn't it? >> somehow they're twisting that -- >> that's what is going on all day long. picking out convenient information. and that's fine if you're an opinion host or columnist, it doesn't work in the news business. the broader problem here, what are we taught in grade school in the president is the most powerful person. when we have a president who's this reckless on twitter, it breaks that normal mold. >> his words need to be precise. here to discuss all of this a former white house investigator and john flannery. it's so good to have both of you on this evening. the fbi director was
incredulous, when he heard president trump's unsubstantiated allegations against president obama. james clapper says it's not true. the president put his reputation at risk. why do you think the president is making these accusations. >> it's typical. he's a one trick pony. he always does the same thing, he tries to cover up what is bad news, by making an outrageous statement, a thread, some trash talk, and hopes that drives us away, this time he's the victim, he had this search. there's no proof of it, he attacks the president. and when his spokespersons come forward, no one will own it, and he's gone underground, nobody
can talk to him today. it's an administration full of liars. we have the president lying, the attorney general lying to the senate, and we got rid of our national security adviser for lying to the vice president. if we really believe he lied to the vice president. this is -- to borrow john dean who was on earlier, there's a cancer on this president and he's spinning out of control trying to conceal whatever deal they had with the russians, whether it was to give them a buy on the sanctions or it was to make some business deal of his own. that's what the hypothesis should be for a special prosecutor, why is this happening. luckily, this guy is a bad liar. there have been better liars in the past who became successful december pots. >> there's been no credible connection between the trump campaign at this point. i know that -- what you said,
but that's your belief. >> no, i think there are facts -- i'm sorry, don. the facts are, the meeting that we had for the attorney general at the republican convention, core respondeded in the platform for senator cruz, which was to enhance the sanctions. and the trump campaign. >> that was already in the works. >> well, why was the national security head of his campaign present at that meeting and talking to the ambassador, those are the hypothesis we should be testing. we're not doing it now. they have us talking about this nonsense. >> i agree with you, and we're going to stick to russia, and that is our mission here. robert, wherever the story leads us, by saying president obama ordered his phones tapped at trump tower illegally. isn't he insinuating the intelligence community broke the law too and included against him by doing that? >> all of these things are dangerous inferences, what you
just heard from mr. flannery is the -- an attempt to try to argue proximity and draw inferences from proximity to the fact that there was collusion. i don't know what hand or what didn't happen, but it's a little -- it's no more ridiculous to argue that, than it is to argue that president obama authorized wiretaps of trump tower. >> that's wrong. who knows whether or not that happened. but i do know you have investigations to find out, and you often encounter the ridiculous, the implausible. the possible. and you sort out fact from fiction. i do think an investigation is warranted. there seems to be a bipartisan consensus for that, but it should be handled in the political process, which why congress should do it. the calls for a special counsel at this point are ridiculous. i'm not sure what a special council would be doing.
there hasn't been a suggestion at the moment that there's credible evidence to believe a crime has been committed. >> isn't the president saying that if someone did in fact order wiretaps, which means they would have to get a fisa warrant. there would have to be some sort of evidence that shows that president trump or someone associated with president trump may have been -- had some untore id relationship or dealings with a foreign entity? >> not necessarily so. you could be legitimately investigating to determine what the efforts were by foreign powers, including russia, to influence the united states, without necessarily believing that a crime was committed by either the campaign or members of the campaign. i'm not sure that necessarily follows, i don't think you're going to have to wait long before you find the fbi director is going to -- unless the
department of justice says something, he's likely to come forward and issue a statement on his own. i think based upon the person that i know, and i know him quite well and his reputation -- >> james comey. >> yeah. >> i want to play this. the fbi asked the justice department do knock down the allegations allegedly. a rebuke of a sitting president, and tonight sara murray asked sean spicer about the president's reaction, watch this. >> what's the president's view of james comey right now? does he have the president's full faith and confidence to stay on as the fbi director. >> i'm not, i don't think -- we've only heard unsubstantiated anonymous sources make that claim. i don't think director comey has commented on anything he has allegedly said. i'm not going to comment on what people say he might have said. the director is more than capable of speaking for himself. >> if the director comes out and
makes a statement, do you -- >> do you think he'd be fired? >> well, this president has a pattern of people who don't do exactly what he wants getting cashiered. it's very interesting, we have a president who's concerned about aknown mouse sources and fake news. and he's the author of the very thing we're talking about today, which is his smoke screen to avoid the underlying question about russia, that's the kind of consciousness of guilt and, you know, we have to emphasize time and again why would russia interfere with an election that helps only him, and conceals whatever negative information they may have had about the president? when you conduct an investigation, you begin with a hypothesis, and we have one here that's serious that resulted in a presidential ban against russia, throwing some of its representatives out of the country. and it appears there was an effort to compromise it by a citizen at the time.
>> maybe they did it because she disliked hillary clinton and not necessarily liked donald trump? >> i feel better if they were citizens of the united states, instead of a foreign nation state that has an antagonistic view of our sanctions against them for invading crimea. >> stand by. in my johnsonville commercial we open up in the forest. hi. i'm jeff. i'm eating my breakfast and all of a sudden a raccoon come up and ask me, "what are you eating?" i told him "johnsonville breakfast sausage, fully cooked." porcupine comes in and he says, "does that come in patties?" i said "yup" wolf comes in and says, "how'd you learn to talk to animals?" and i said "books" and we had a good laugh about that. [laughter] that's a commercial made the johnsonville way.
announcer: get on your feet for the nastiest bull in the state of texas. ♪ ♪ c'mohappy birthday! i survived a heart attack. i'm doing all i can to keep from having another one. and i'm taking brilinta. for people who've been hospitalized for a heart attack. i take brilinta with a baby aspirin. no more than one hundred milligrams as it affects how well it works. brilinta helps keep my platelets from sticking together and forming a clot. brilinta reduced the chance of another heart attack. or dying from one. it worked better than plavix. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor since stopping it too soon increases your risk of
clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. tell your doctor about bleeding, new or unexpected shortness of breath, any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. talk to your doctor about brilinta. i'm doing all i can. that includes brilinta. if you can't afford your medication, astra zeneca may be able to help.
[second man] ah,ah, ah. oh no! [first man] saves us some drilling. [burke] and we covered it, february fourteenth, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ president trump's accusation that the former president, braumd tapped his phones during the campaign, taking the spotlight off of russia. robert ray and john flannery. robert, to you, now. the attorney general had to recuse himself many his confirmation hearing starts tomorrow, why not put the investigation in the hands of an independent prosecutor? >> because it sends a terrible message, particularly early on in an administration. my concern is with the institution, the department of justice. if you lift the investigation
out of the department, it's essentially saying the department of justice can't do justice, and that's not a healthy think -- let's put this issue aside, institution ali, it's a bad idea, it's why the independent council statute was not renewed. the special council regulations envision a conflict with the department so so veer that not only is the attorney general recused, but the department of justice itself is not capable of conducting a fair and independent investigation. and that's not a good idea. >> john, you take umbrage to that, i can tell. >> the justice department as we now have it is headed by a person who lied to the senate who promised them an explanation, he hasn't given them, who wouldn't even talk to the press today, when they were rolling out the new immigration policy and does america trust that department? that's why you have an independent investigation. there are so many conflicts in
every direction. one of the obvious ones, we have comey seeking the department of justice to make an announcement saying there were no wiretaps, nobody there will take responsibility. the department is not working on that simple and complicated issue. how can we expect them to run an investigation? >> what would you have them do, john? >> i would have an independent council appointed. there are a variety of ways to do it, one of them may be to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. but -- and, you know, it should have a charter, the charter is pretty obvious, any and all contacts with the russians in connection with the recent election, and the sanctions both before and after the election, and to examine the apparent false statements or outright lies we've had from a variety of people -- >> okay. and to see if the data points cone side to criminal activity or misconduct or perjury. >> i've got to move on to
another subject. i want to get your input on this as well. let's talk about this new ban. the order bans six countries, takes iraq out of it. it's still based on refusingentry to people from predominantly muslim countries. do you think this is going to make it through the courts? >> it's not going to make it through the courts without review. obviously, we're in an environment now with two administrations where we're essentially pursuing executive action through executive orders, opposed to traditional legislation. i don't see any reason to think they won't be tested. this one has a better chance of addressing some due process issues, it doesn't apply to green cardholders, i think with regard to issues involving
whether or not there's a first amendment question, it will be dressed by the court in an appropriate fashion. >> green card and visa holders are exempt. the preference for christians is gone. syrian refugees no longer indefinitely banned. the government has made a case the ban is needed to prevent terror here. >> it doesn't give a clean bill of health. there are going to be issues raised. >> they'll be challenged in the courts. >> people still don't like it, but this is a very watered down version, the president makes -- feels this makes him look weak because he had to water it down. >> i'm sure he thinks that, but they should have read the decisions we had from the ninth circuit. no one has been saying in terms of what we were doing for extreme vetting didn't work.
and this proposal still has an attack on muslims, it's a ban on muslims, it basically admits they were wrong. >> you think it's going to hold up in court? >> no, i don't think so. in the report, we don't want you to have a tro, we don't want you to stop it the day it starts. we're all going to be at the airports again, and we're going to protest it, and we're going to be in court, and it's going to be frozen again. >> and i'll be here moderating a discussion between the two of you. >> hello, it's a new administration, it will be tested, it will be found to be just fine. dr. ben carson. the new housing secretary exposing commenting he made today about slavery. if you need. it's like having the power of a trading floor, wherever you are. it's your trade. e*trade
serious accusation at his predecess predecessor, is the 45th president obsessed with the 44th? here to join us eric dyson. let me get your take on what happened. >> let's not sit here on television and pretend this is normal. and people pretend it's normal. this is not normal, the president of the united states does not usually do something like this, this is bipartisan craziness, people from the left and right have said, this is not normal, this is not what we expect of a leader, the most powerful man in the world. the inability to have deferred gratification or the discipline to impose on oneself. don't say everything you think. a lot of people have thought crazy things, donald trump is channeling what their inner ego, their innerself is about. there are no facts to match what
his suppositions are, and his assertions, when he just spews this, he is just using twitter as a means to display his paranoia, his presumptiveness and his obsession with barack obama. he can't let him go. >> that's what i was going to ask you, he claims -- his words were, that the former president wiretapped trump tower, they're spinning it now saying, oh, no, it was the administration, he said, the president. and then the evidence to that, that he didn't mean the administration, he said sic, this is like watergate, he was talking about comparing the former president to nixon, specifically saying he was sick. he said the former president ordered the raid on yemen when the navy s.e.a.l. was killed. this president's like under the bed, he thinks he's going to grab him in the middle of the
night. >> here's a man who made us believe that barack obama was the boogy man. he spent years of his life trying to convince america this guy is illegitimate, ilconformed and tried to abort him from the womb of democracy. now he's calling him richard nixon? here's a guy who's incapable of acknowledge that the paranoia is his own. richard hoff stetter talked about it in the '50s, this is the living embodiment of what he's speaking about, and donald trump's obsession with the man he thinks is inferior. if he's so bad, why you obsessed with him, as the streets might say, and the preoccupation with him, is the ruin of american politics. >> this is what i said about him, under the bed, a piece in politico. there seems to be a true sense in trump's mind that obama is practically sitting beneath the
floors of the west wing chipping away at the west wing. trump should know obama never left the white house. he's in the closet, he has says ars. >> well, that's steven king, who was gracious enough to give me a nice word for my book. here's the thing, he's not under the floorboards, he's in his mind. now the guy he claimed to be inferior and illegitimate is now at the center of the american political imagination according to donald trump. and the paranoia grows and the delusions that are attached to that paranoia are scary. he's castigating his own intelligence community. james comey has begged for the department of justice to say, this is not true. while the white house is begging the fbi head to say there was no collusion between russia and the campaign. >> and general hayden who was served under democratic and republican presidents has said,
you know, this is -- i have seen nothing like this, the intelligence agencies are there to serve the president. and he is basically -- >> undercutting them. >> here's what people meant when they kept begging us at the beginning, don't normalize this. they didn't have to worry about this, there's no fear of normalization. even those who begged for the normalization to take place, acknowledge this ain't real and this ain't normal. >> why do supporters make excuses for him? >> because they're complicit. he's not the product of himself, if we're sticking to horror, frankenstein is the name of the doctor not the monster, the people who produced him, there's a relationship organically between donald trump, and some of the previous incarnations of republican ideology. when mitch mcconnell said, we want to make him a one term president and everything he does we'll stop. that's organically related to what donald trump did. >> speaking of doctors, i want to get this right, housing and
urban development secretary ben carson talked about immigrants coming from ellis island while speaking to department employees earlier. listen. >> that's what america is about. a land of dreams and opportunity. there were other immigrants that came here, on slave ships that worked even longer and harder for less. they too had a dream that one day their sons, great granddaughters might pursue prosperity. and happiness in this land. >> who knew that martin luther king jr. was enslaved in america, and speaking about his dream. this was one of the most atrocious acts of historical revisionism that one might imagine. again, from a man that was at
the height of the american power, as the secretary of hud, it's astonishing, first of all, these are forced immigrants at best. these are people who were compelled to come here. they came over on slave ships where they were con scripted to serve not as indentured servants. they didn't have a dream, their dream was to stay in africa. they were rudely extricated from african soil to serve the legacy of american slavery, and dr. carson has turned them into willing immigrants who came here in search of a dream. >> you know one of his advisers, personal advisers in armstrong williams, when i read this, i texted armstrong. he's referring to involuntary immigrants. he directed me to his radio show tonight, which dr. carson was on, and he explained it this way. >> i've seen people need to look
up the word immigrant. whether you're voluntary or involuntary, if you come from outside to the inside, you're an immigrant, whether you're legal or illegal. you come from the outside to inside you're an immigrant. slaves came here as involuntary immigrants. but they still had the strength to hold on. >> does this clarification change anything for you? >> not at all. let's give him the positive recognition there, it is true, that the enslaved people did have the forbearance and the fortitude to hang on, but again, to confuse the matter by suggesting there was a relationship between immigrants who came here from eastern and western europe and africans who were brought here in chains is as the great philosopher mike tyson would say, ludicrous, it's astonishing that dr. carson, a well known neurosurgeon of the highest order would then try to work a kind of surgery on us,
where he confuses us with terms, and if terms mean nothing. they have no meaning, and to say they are involuntary immigrants, to be sure. immigrants suggest a kind of willfulness, an agency exercise, they were not engaged in the act of coming here, with their own, if you will volition, it was against their will. and i think dr. carson has distorted the entire process. they weren't looking at the statue of liberty going, things are going to be great for us. >> exactly right. thank you, sir. >> what's the book again? >> tears we cannot stop. >> yes, sir, thank you. >> thank you so much. we're going to continue this conversation and more with our group of panelists when we come back. it's not something you do now and then. or when it's convenient. it's using state-of-the-art simulators to better prepare for any situation. it's giving offshore teams onshore support. and it's empowering anyone to stop a job
if something doesn't seem right. at bp, safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better. at bp, safety is never being satisfied. weeds. nature's boomerang. at roundup®, we know they keep coming back. draw the line. one spray of roundup® max control 365 kills weeds to the root and keeps 'em away for up to one year. roundup® max control 365. so we know how to cover almost alanything.ything, even a "truck-cicle."
[second man] how you doing? [ice cracking] [second man] ah,ah, ah. oh no! [first man] saves us some drilling. [burke] and we covered it, february fourteenth, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ hey ron! they're finally taking down that schwab billboard. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index investing for that low? that's three times less than fidelity... ...and four times less than vanguard. what's next, no minimums? ...no minimums. schwab has lowered the cost of investing again. introducing the lowest cost index funds in the industry with no minimums. i bet they're calling about the schwab news. schwab. a modern approach to wealth management.
secretary. it may not be going exactly as he planned, so let's discuss now, kayleigh mcenany is here. here we are back to the fun and games, everyone. good evening, thank you for coming on, i'm sure you heard the conversation i had with michael eric dyson right now, i want to play the comments from ben carson, where he appears to compare slaves to immigrants. he begins to talk about the photos of people who came here to ellis islandp 3. >> not eight hours a day, but 10, 12, 16 hours a day, no such thing as a minimum wage. they worked not for themselves but for their sons and their daughters. and their grandsons and their granddaughters that they might have an opportunity in this land.
that's what america is about. a land of dreams and opportunity. there were other immigrants who came here, on the bottom of slaveships who worked even longer, even hard irfor less, but they too had a dream, that one day their sons daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, grandsons, great granddaughters, great grandsons might pursue happiness and prosperity in this land. >> can you give us some insight as to what he meant here and why he would say that? >> look, don, dr. carson has released a statement that was posted to his facebook page about an hour ago, where he did collar phi the remarks that he made earlier today, when he was addressing the staff, the career staff at the agency. and in those remarks, he made it -- in that clarification, he
made it very clear that in no way was attempting to compare the slave narrative to the immigrant narrative, the two are extremely disper ate. and the fortitude our ancestors displayed when being forced into this country is not something anyone would attempt to challenge. >> i know what you're saying. >> hold on, don. hold on. >> nope, nope, nope, nope. it doesn't work that way. you said he wasn't attempting to, but that's exactly what he did, by comparing people from ellis island. slaves couldn't even come through ellis island or see the statue of liberty, because it wasn't during that time, that's the point. there were two different experiences. he himself he was comparing it, maybe in his explanation he said that. >> i'm not disagreeing with the facts as it pertains to slavery and immigrants coming from european countries into america. that's not what i'm attempting to do, i'm saying dr. carson
made a statement. clearly, he's recognized that his statements were not the best statements at that time, and collar phied those statements, once on armstrong williams show. >> okay, i get what you're saying. >> don. >> he further collar phied it on facebook. >> i played the sound bite from the armstrong -- i get what you're saying. you're saying you think he misspoke, he didn't say it properly. >> he collar phied. we have to give him credit for clarification. >> simone, what do you think? >> i think this is absolutely ridiculous. i think what dr. carson did today should not be overlooked or cast aside as misspeaking, this was an attempt at revisionist history, what the trump administration has done before. we can look at betsy devos. we have to be careful and say dr. carson cleaned this up and made it clear. i am more confused by dr. carson's statement, i don't think he understands the grave
grave -- just egregious misstep he made today. >> do we have -- >> hold on shamichael. if we have the thing from the armstrong show, let me know, and we'll play it. quickly, i want to get kayleigh in here. >> i don't think it's fair to say dr. carson doesn't have an understanding of slave history. i can't find any african-american who doesn't understand the -- >> well, as -- >> simone, simone. hold on, hold on simone. i can understand why people found dr. carson's statement to be problematic, and clearly dr. carson recognized that, which is why he has corrected his orge analogy statement simone -- >> okay, you said that, you said that. you said that. >> the point he doesn't understand -- >> there are a lot of people who may not -- just because you're black doesn't mean you understand slave history. people go to schools just like everyone else. people go to schools, sometimes
they're not taught black history, they don't understand black history. >> that's not the premise of my point don, what i'm saying is, dr. carson is an intelligent person, dr. carson is a good person, throughout his career, his number one goal has been serving others, at the core, that's who he is. a servant leader, and in knowing dr. carson, he would never do or say anything with the intent to hurt or malign people. i think he misspoke, and i think he recognized that, which is why i believe he provided further clarity on his facebook page an hour ago. >> we're going to play what he said on armstrong's show and let kevin and kayleigh get in right after this. ♪ we've got the beer ♪ miller beer
won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call
knowing where you stand. it's never been easier. except when it comes to your retirement plan. but at fidelity, we're making retirement planning clearer. and it all starts with getting your fidelity retirement score. in 60 seconds, you'll know where you stand. and together, we'll help you make decisions for your plan... to keep you on track. ♪ time to think of your future it's your retirement. know where you stand. back now with kayleigh mcenany, symone sanders, kevin
madden, and shermichael singleton. all right, mr. madden, i know you want to get in on this. we talk about these subjects all the time and i want to play what is dr. c dr. carson said on strom williams' radio show. >> i think people actually need to look up the word "immigrant." whether you're voluntary or involuntary, if you come from outside to the inside, you're an immigrant. whether you're legal or you're illegal, you come from the outside to inside, you're an immigrant. slaves came here as involuntary immigrants. but they still had the strength to hold on. >> okay, so, an immigrant is a person who comes to another country to live voluntarily for a long time, who comes. and then he, shermichael said, he wrote about it on facebook, but he never said, i messed up
or what i intended to say was, he just said, the two, that immigrants and slaves, the narrative that the two share spiral different experiences, and they shouldn't be conflated. i'm paraphrasing here, but that's kind of what he did. what do you think? >> well, i don't think it's -- it helps a lot to be trying to parse or litigant his use of the term "immigrant." i think the original remarks were disagreeable and wrong. they're easily proven wrong. and he should move on to that. i thought shermichael did as good a job as you can do in pointing out that secretary carson was speaking extemporaneo extemporaneously. he would have chosen different words if he could have, and move on. but that's one of the mistakes in this response, is to go round and round over the use of the term immigrant. look, my parents were immigrants. they came here from ireland because they wanted to. they were not sold into bondage like so many african-americans were. there's a big difference there. understand that difference and move on. >> kayleigh mcenany? >> yeah, i mean, i don't think
it's harmful to parse his every word, either. and in fact, when i look at someone's statement that comes under fire, i like to look at the heart of what he was trying to say. and clearly, i think what he was trying to do, even though his comparison was inept, was to compare, you know, struggles that his ancestors went therero and compare them to struggles that immigrants go through. and he clarified on facebook and pointed out some of the huge differences there he wished he would have pointed out in his speech. but the last sentence he said on facebook is the heart of what he was trying to say. we should revel in the fact that although we got here through many different rauts, we have many things now that unite us. i think that's what he was trying to do and i think lambasting the guy for making an inartful comparison isn't help p ful. >> and to kayleigh's point, the people who were in the room and heard these comments live, it didn't even strike them, at first. i think it's because it goes through this whole new level of scrutiny that he's taking a hit
on this. >> hmm. >> any can comment really quickly, his remarks in their entirety was relatively well received at the career staff at hud. even towards the end, there was a woman who stood up and said, you know, i wasn't too sure about you, but having hearing your remarks in their entirety, i have great comfort. and that should provide a lot of credence who those who are watching. >> when you're the hud secretary, your remarks are going to be seen further than that roop. >> no one disagrees with that. >> ain't will have time left. go ahead, simone. >> whether it's the hud secretary, the secretary of education, or the president of the united states himself. this administration has to take more care in the words that they use and under no circumstances should we gloss over the fact that today, the secretary of housing and urban development tried to equate people who were brought to this country in chains with immigrant who is voluntary come here. this administration has some work to do. >> yeah, it's -- um, listen, i
understand when everyone says, america's a country of immigrants, but we got here in different ways. >> and we all acknowledge that -- >> and those ways do matter. in a big way. thank you, all. >> no one's disagreeing with that. >> thank you all. i'll see you next time. good night. wow. you grilled that chicken? yup! i did... n't. smartmade frozen meals. real ingredients, grilled and roasted. it's like you made it. and you did... n't. are upgrading their watere filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids... pour it through brita's two-stage filter... dissolved solids remain! what if we filter it over and over? oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.
say goodbye to extra taxes and fees on your wireless bill and hello to t-mobile one. right now, get 2 lines of unlimited data for $100 bucks taxes and fees included. 2 lines, $100 dollars. all in, all unlimited. switch today. afoot and light-hearted i take to the open road. healthy, free, the world before me, the long brown path before me leading wherever i choose. the east and the west are mine. the north and the south are mine.
all seems beautiful to me. imagine if the things you bought every day earned you miles to get to the places you really want to go. with the united mileageplus explorer card, you'll get a free checked bag, 2 united club passes... priority boarding... and 50,000 bonus miles. everything you need for an unforgettable vacation. the united mileageplus explorer card. imagine where it will take you.
good evening. thanks for joining us tonight. there is still no more evidence to support mr. trump's latest unfounded claim that president obama wiretapped him than there was the moment he made it on saturday morning. there is, however, a full-blown firestorm ranging over it right now in washington. first, the genesis of the claim that prompted james comey to go so far as to ask the justice department to refute it over the weekend. think about that for a moment the nation's top lawman asking for a public denunciation of the sitting president of the united states. that's where we are tonight. let's take a moment to look at where we got here. saturday morning the president is at mar-a-lago according to "the washipo