tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN March 8, 2017 2:00pm-3:01pm PST
ban will hurt the potential for the u.s. and somalia to fight terror. jake? >> our thanks to david mackenzie. that's it for "the lead." i'm jake tapper. i now turn you over to one mr. wolf blitzer. he is right next door to me in a place i like to call "the situation room." thanks for watching. >> happening now, breaking news. more questions. key lawmakers get a look at cia intelligence on russian meddling in the presidential election, and they have more questions after seeing evidence of actions favoring one candidate. and as lawmakers move forward on president trump's claim that he was wiretapped and his demand for an investigation, should he be careful what he wishes for? massive difference. when damaging leaks helped his election campaign, donald trump proclaimed, quote, i love wikileaks. now that wikileaks claims to have released documents on cia hacking, the white house says there is a massive difference between the two cases. tough sell. president trump goes all out to
push the gop's obamacare replacement plan, but conservatives are dead set against their party's plan. can the veteran deal maker close the deal? and son of none, in hiding from the north korea regime, the son offers a new video speaking out for the first time since his father was publicly assassinated. is he also on a hit list? i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news, members of the senate intelligence committee visit the cia and pour over raw intelligence data on russia's interference in the election campaign. one senator tells cnn there is evidence of arc tichlt favoring one candidate. he won't discuss allegations of trump campaign involvement, but says the lawmakers have more
questions. meantime, president trump has called for an investigation of his unsubstantiated claim that he was wiretapped during the campaign by president obama. now he's got one. leaders of the senate subcommittee are asking the justice department to see any documents that may exist on such surveillance. and they are prepared to use their subpoena power. leaders of other panels have said they will also investigate the claim. officials say a federal criminal probe has been opened into the publication of files by wikileaks which claims the documents revealed methods the cia uses to hack into smart phones, tvs, and other devices worldwide. and the white house says president trump is in full sell mode on health care. but congressional conservatives aren't buying. the president will bring critics to the white house and hit the road to push the obamacare replacement plan, but he'll need to study up on the art of the deal to win over opponents who have already declared the plan dead. i'll speak with iraqi democrat on the intelligence
committee. congressman adam schiff, and our correspondents, analysts and guests, they're standing by with full coverage of the day's top stories. investigations are gathering steam right now into russia's campaign meddling and the president's claim that he was wiretapped by his predecessor. let's begin with our senior congressional reporter manu raju. manu, why are senators personally now going over to cia headquarters? >> reporter: well, wolf, tonight the intelligence committee are pushing forward into investigations on russia's involvement. whether or not there were campaign contacts with trump officials when russian officials at that time while russia was trying to apparently help elect donald trump, that in the view of the intelligence community. now, today four senators went to cia headquarters in langley, virginia to pour over raw intelligence to look at exactly what russia was doing. one of those was senator mark warner, the top democrat in the committee who told me that it
looks like from that data that russia was trying to help one candidate over another. >> a lot of what we saw today was the evidence underlying how russia manipulated the news, how it hacked into the dnc and john podesta and leaked out in favor of one candidate against another candidate. but i think these efforts beyond even the whole question about whether there were contacts between campaigns and the russians, but this underlying assault on our democracy, i think americans need to know about this. >> reporter: is there anything that suggests that the trump campaign was involved in coordinating that release of information? >> at this point i'm not going to get into that part of the discussion. that's part of our investigation. it's always been about the misinformation. it's been about the hacking and selective release of e-mails. >> reporter: now, wolf, two things that mark warner did point to was a change in the republican party platform to
discuss russia's treatment towards ukraine and more favorable terms that russia perhaps would like. and also donald trump's praise of vladimir putin when i asked him about any evidence of coordination. and those are issues that some members want to see here publicly, a public hearing now being called for by another member of the intelligence committee. that's susan collins of maine telling me earlier she wants a public hearing to discuss the issues because this committee often operates in secret, wolf. >> manu, at the same time this other committee is demanding information over the president's claims that former president obama wiretapped him, what do we know about that? >> reporter: yeah, that's right. two top senators, senator lindsey graham of south carolina, senator sheldon whitehouse, a democrat of rhode island who head a key subcommittee, are asking for information from the justice department and the fbi for any warrants or any applications to suggest that the obama administration was at that time trying to spy on president, now
president trump as the president is suggesting. i talked to lindsey graham about that and here's what he said. >> the president has asked congress to look into whether or not his campaign was wiretapped by the obama administration. i will take up that challenge and we sent a letter to the department of justice and the fbi asking them for any information that they may have used to obtain a warrant. the whole purpose of this is to find out if a warrant was issued, directed at the trump campaign. >> reporter: and if they don't provide this information? >> then i'll have done my job. either they are lying to me or there is no information, and i don't believe they would lie to me about this. i expect them to come forward as to whether or not a warrant was obtained or sought. >> reporter: and will you subpoena this information if they don't comply? >> yes. >> reporter: now, wolf, lindsey graham actually had lunch with president trump yesterday at the white house. i asked him, did you talk about this issue of wiretapping? he said, well, we actually talked largely about the issue
of russia, talking about lindsey graham's tough approach, hard line approach to russia. he believes after that conversation president trump may take a tougher tone towards russia after they discussed this issue in-depth, wolf. >> all right, manu, thank you. manu raju up on capitol hill. meantime president trump being called on to use his deal making skills to rescue the republican leadership's obamacare replacement plan, strongly opposed by many conservative lawmakers. let's go to our senior white house correspondent jeff zeleny. jeff, the president certainly has his work cut out for him right now. >> reporter: he does, wolf. and he's beginning at actually at this hour with many groups who are opposed to this health care plan, conservative groups. he is going to be meeting in the roosevelt room here at the white house in the next several minutes with people from heritage action, tea party patriots, club for growth, some key core conservative groups who are opposed to this bill. he hopes he can win them over and he hopes they spread the message to conservative republicans against the plan.
president trump's movement carried him to the white house, but can it save his health care plan? that is the question today from the west wing to capitol hill. as conservative criticism rises over the republican plan to remake the american health care system. >> i think he's in a very much of a sell mode. >> reporter: it's the biggest sales pitch of the young presidency. white house press secretary sean spicer says the president is ready to twist arms and hit the road to make his case. >> this is going to be a very, very aggressive comprehensive approach to making sure that every american understands that there is a major problem and that we are here to fix it. >> reporter: never mind the democratic defiance. >> trump care is a health care handout for the wealthiest americans and fake health care for everybody else. >> reporter: it's the fierce republican opposition the president must first overcome. >> work quickly. >> reporter: appoint his making privately to skeptical gop lawmakers. >> i got elected to a certain extent, i would say, pretty good
little chunk based on the fact repeal and replace obamacare. and many of you people are in the same boat. very important, so, let's get it done. >> reporter: that was the president's message to gop leaders on tuesday. but today for the second time this week, he had no public appearances at the white house. the vice-president was taking his turn at explaining the plan publicly, hitting the airwaves in six states across the country. all of which he and mr. trump turned red in november. house speaker paul ryan dismissed the criticism from within his own ranks saying lawmakers are simply learning how to govern with a republican president. >> i think what you're seeing is we're going through the inevitable growing pains of being an opposition party to becoming a governing party. >> the gentleman from ohio, jim jofrd an. >> reporter: some of the loudest resistance is coming from jordan in ohio, tea party who railed against him on the campaign trail. >> let's make america great again. >> reporter: but now he has this to say about president trump's
health care bill. >> i believe when you look through it is obamacare in a different form. >> reporter: the president's health care message could be undercut by a fight over his credibility. in the wake of unfounded claims he made that president obama wiretapped his phones last year at trump tower. when asked today whether the president believed he was the target of a counter intelligence investigation, spicer initially said, a congressional probe would reveal that answer. but later after an aide handed him a note of clarification, spicer said this. >> there is no reason that we should -- that we have to think that the president is the target of any investigation whatsoever. >> reporter: meanwhile cnn has learned that former president obama was irked and exasperated by the stunning suggestion he was spying on trump. an aide called the claim simply false. with all of this wiretapping conversation going on on capitol hill, the president is trying to sell this plan. wolf, he's going to hit the road we're told as soon as this weekend likely traveling to kentucky, the home state of
senator rand paul who has been one of the most outspoken republicans about this. wolf, the whole question here is what are the consequences for republicans for standing up and defying their president? that's one of the things that he will try and express to them, it's one of the things they will find out if they do. wolf? >> all right, jeff, thank you. jeff zeleny from the white house. let's get back to our breaking news. joining us now the senior democrat on the house intelligence committee congressman adam schiff of california. congressman, thanks for joining us. >> you bet. >> so, you just heard the white house press secretary sean spicer say the president is not the target of a counter intelligence investigation. so, how could he have been wiretapped? >> well, you know, of course, he couldn't have been and i don't know what this means now as sean spicer now acknowledging that what the president said over the weekend was flatly false. and if so, don't you think the president owes an apology not just to the former president, but the entire american people? we will have director comey and others, i hope, coming in for
our open hearing march 20th. we ought to be able to put this to rest once and for all. but i don't think sean spicer can get away with just saying, well, okay, there is nothing to see here, let's move on. the president of the united states just levelled an unprecedented accusation of illegality at the former president and the country deserves an answer about just why he did that. >> republican senator lindsey graham on the judiciary committee said, this is an issue for his committee as well, his subcommittees. are you aware of any evidence at all that president trump was the target of the criminal investigation? >> i'm not aware of any evidence of any wiretapping. whether there were any counter intelligence investigations going on, that's not something i can speak to at this point. but i'm not aware of anything targeting mr. trump. and for the president to suggest that he was the target of
wiretapping i think was grossly irresponsible. and if the press reports are accurate that director comey wanted the justice department to speak out on this, we are going to give the director the opportunity to do that quite directly. so, we will be able to put this to rest. the president as of i think 24 hours ago [ inaudible ] to investigate this. we are going to oblige him and on march 20th i think we'll have ample testimony that this claim was nonsensical, false, reckless, and scandalous in its breath taking dishonesty frankly. >> do you know if there was any wiretapping going on, not of then president candidate trump, but others at trump tower who were associated with donald trump? >> well, you know, it's quite a separate question from what the president alleged. that is, were there counter intelligence investigations going on, or even non-counter intelligence investigations, but our own review of what foreign
spies are up to that incidentally captured or either corroborated information, pointed to some collusion or captured conversations with u.s. persons. that is not something i can comment on, but that is not what the president alleged. and we shouldn't let his staff or surrogates by means of subterfuge try to confuse what it is the president accused his predecessor of doing. whether there were incident -- that is a completely different matter and not something [ inaudible ]. >> you accepted the request to investigate the president's claims. president obama illegally wiretapped him during the end of the campaign [ inaudible ] trump tower in new york. have you actually asked the white house to provide your committee with any and all evidence of whatever they might have to back up the president's tweets? >> you know, i don't know that we've made that formal request, but we have made a request of
those who would have been in place at the time to come testify in open hearing. that's what the subject of this will be. we have asked director clapper, director brennan, director comey, sally yates, among others, to come in and i think we will be able to resolve this very quickly. but i can only imagine the answer that we would get back from the administration if we went directly to them with that question. >> has the white house officially reached out to you about this, or is it your investigation just based on that statement released by the white house press secretary sean spicer, that they want congress, the house and the senate intelligence committees to investigate? >> you know, they certainly haven't reached out to me. whether they have reached out to majority, i don't know, but frankly i think there is a national interest that knowing whether our president just leveled a completely false allegation against his predecessor. and this is among the very easiest allegations to
investigate because it's simply a matter of putting those questions to people under oath who would have been in position to know. and we should have all those persons present on march 20th. >> i spoke earlier today with one of your colleagues, democratic house intelligence committee member jackie spear of california. she said, even looking into all of this gives credibility to president trump's claims. does it? >> well, i don't think there is any credibility to these claims. you've heard from mitch mcconnell and other republican leadership as well as rank and file. no one has seen any evidence of this. so, i don't think it has much [ inaudible ], but they have asked us to look into that and be careful what you wish for. i'd like to have those that were present at the time be asked the question, was the president of the united states being honest? was he being accurate when he accused his predecessor of wiretapping he and his
associates? because there needs to be some repercussion to this kind of reckless allegation. and in this case, i think the repercussion is that we will have high ranking current and former officials telling the american people whether the president was truthful with them. >> so, when you say be careful what you wish for, as far as the president is concerned, i'd like you to elaborate what you mean by that. >> well, president asked us to investigate that and now he's going to get what he wanted because he's going to have the director of the fbi, the former director of the cia, people from the justice department, all able to testify about whether he was telling the truth. i'm not sure that's exactly what he wanted when he asked us to investigate because this won't be done in a closed private session. it won't be done away from the public spotlight. no, it will be done while the country is watching. and i'm not sure that's exactly what they had in mind, but that's exactly what i hope they are going to get. >> well, does this open the door, congressman, to subpoena
donald trump's business records, his tax returns, for example, is that something you're looking to do? >> well, you know, again, i think that we ought to follow the facts where they lead. if ultimately the facts have led in a direction that the russians or other used financial entanglement with the president or his organizations as a means of exerting influence over him, then it would be within the scope of our investigation. but we have a lot of spade work to do i think before we're ready to draw conclusions about that. and there's plenty of work that's already underway. but, again, this is going to take us time to figure out just what are the credible allegations here, where does the evidence lead, what witnesses do we need to bring in, what documents do we need to obtain, and i think the way that this investigation can be credible and can add value is if we can find a way to do this in a non-partisan fashion. the last thing we want to do is
do an investigation where the majority issues one report, the minority issues another. this is going to be obviously enormously challenging given how politically fraught it is. but that would be in the national interest. if there is a way we can find to go through this political thicket and do the job the american people really need us to do. >> congressman, i want you to stand by because there are more questions on the breaking news we're following right now. stick around. we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. [vo] quickbooks introduces rodney.
but when joint pain and stiffness from psoriatic arthritis hit... even the smallest things became difficult. so i talked to my rheumatologist... and he prescribed enbrel... to help relieve joint pain and help stop further joint damage. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis... lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders, and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common... or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. get back to the things that matter most. ask how enbrel can help relieve joint pain and help stop joint damage. enbrel, the number one rheumatologist-prescribed biologic.
♪music continues [daughter] papa! [father] i missed you! [daughter]did you bring new ones? [vo] you work hard for more than just you... [daughter]you went to montana!? [father] i did! i went to montana... [vo] working together, we'll help you save for her future geology degree. wells fargo. we're back with the senior democrat of the house intelligence committee, congressman adam schiff of california. congressman, you're chairman of the house committee chairman.
devin nunez said they have made visits to cia headquarters in langley, virginia regarding the probe into the trump campaign's ties to russia. have you gone out to langley and seen the raw data? >> i'm going to be going out to langley, i hope to get out there if not this week then next week. there is a mountain of raw data to go through. but there is a certain subset of the data that i want the agency to put together for me that's going to take time. so, i haven't been out there myself, but our staff has been out there to review the data and i'm planning to go very soon. >> the senate intelligence committee vice chair mark warner spoke to cnn about his visit to cia headquarters and he said he has reviewed lots of documents. he said it has prompted, in his mind at least, more questions, but he would not say if evidence shows that the trump campaign colluded with the russians during the campaign. have you seen any evidence of collusion between russia and the trump campaign? >> wolf, that's not something that i can comment on at this
point. it's still, frankly, very early in the investigation and i don't think any of us ought to be commenting on either the presence of evidence, the volume of evidence, the persuasiveness of evidence. i think it's very premature for us to do that and so i can't comment on it at this point. >> president trump, as you recall, as a candidate, he spoke favorably about wikileaks during the campaign because they were leaking damaging information as far as the democrats and hillary clinton were concerned. but sean spicer said this afternoon at the white house briefering, there briefing, there is absolutely no comparison. listen to this. >> there is a big difference between disclosing john podesta's g machine mail accounts about a back and forth and his uppndermining of hillar clinton and his thoughts of her and the leaking of classified information. there is a massive, massive difference between those two things. and i think it is, again, the interest and the outrage that occurred last year by a lot of
democrats when it came to leaks. it's interesting that we're hearing not as much outrage now when it comes to some of our issues of national security. >> as a lot of our viewers remember during the campaign, trump said, i love wikileaks. your response to what we just heard, the explanation from sean spicer? >> well, you know, i don't envy sean spicer's job. he's got a president who condemned wikileaks when they released the chelsea manning documents which were very damaging, applauded wikileaks when they released documents that helped him in his campaign that were stolen from the clinton campaign by the russians. and now is back to condemning wikileaks. it's enough to give you whiplash. but while i don't envy sean spicer's job, i also don't condone the way he's conducting that job because [ inaudible ] yes, there is a difference between the hacking and the leaking through wikileaks during the campaign. but both were wrong. both were serious injuries to our national security. in the one case you had russia,
a foreign adversarial power stealing documents and publishing them to help donald trump and to hurt hillary clinton. and donald trump applauded wikileaks for doing that, applauded them for being either a witting partner or as the russians would call a useful idiot in their campaign to undermine our democracy. that is one very serious violation of our national security interest. this present leak, if it turns out to be true -- and i can't comment one way or the other -- would be a different kind of injury to our national security. both are wrong. both should be condemned. and the president has a lot of explaining to do about why one with russian involvement help is okay, but the other isn't. >> congressman adam schiff thank you for joining ugs. >> thanks, wolf. >> still ahead, a bizarre twist in the killing of the north korean leader, a young man who claims he's the dead man's son is now speaking out.
hello, welcome. so chevy is the most awarded car company three years in a row. wow. really... let's see how quickly you can read through all their awards. oh gosh... lot of pressure. you ready? go! 2017 motor trend car of the year. kelley blue book 2016 best resale value... 2016 j.d. power highest quality breaking... ack. 10 best blah blah blah 2017 iihs...top safety. only about 90 more to go! 2015 2017 north american car of the year! that's a lot of awards! who would of thought? great, now i'm going to have to go buy a new car. this is my new alert system for whenever anything happens in the market. but thinkorswim already lets you create custom alerts for all the things that are important to you. i guess we don't need the kid anymore. custom alerts on thinkorswim. only at td ameritrade.
this hour's breaking news, leaders of the senate subcommittee now asking the justice department to see any documents that may exist on president trump's claim he was wiretapped during the campaign under orders from president obama. let's bring in our political national security and legal experts. susan, you're joining us right now. you used to work at the national security agency. you're now at brookings. talk a little bit about the legal aspects of all of this because the president, the white house, they are not backing down at all on his assertion in those
tweets saturday morning that president obama illegally wiretapped him during the campaign. now republicans, they want -- republican -- so far republicans on the investigative committees, all of them basically have said they have seen no evidence. if there was a wiretap of trump tower, walk us through how that would happen. >> all right. so, basically there are two forms of surveillance that might be implicated by president trump's tweets which were themselves rather vague. so, one is a title 3 wiretap. that's an ordinary criminal investigation. the other is a fisa warrant. that is an application made to the foreign intelligence surveillance court for counter intelligence or foreign intelligence investigative purposes. in elgt bo of those cases the department of justice and not the president submits an application to a federal judge. that federal judge assesses those applications against standards of probable cause. either that a crime was committed or an individual is an agent of a foreign power, and then issues that warrant. >> but if donald trump's tweet, one of the tweets when he said it's a fact that president obama
was tapping my phones in october at trump tower, a fact, he said, walk us through, how difficult would it be to get surveillance of a candidate under the orders from the then sitting president? >> so, if the department of justice was able to obtain a warrant, that would be very, very [ inaudible ] because it would mean that a judge had determined there was significant evidence that either he or someone involved in his campaign or someone in trump tower had demonstrated probable cause that they were either an agent of a foreign power or committing a crime. so, if that did happen, we would expect president trump to potentially release that fisa order, show to the american people on what basis that judge made a determination. >> but would the nsa, the fbi, would they have to notify the leadership, the gang of 8 as they're called, in the congress? >> right. so, this would be highly significant [ inaudible ] collection of something that was
a fisa warrant. and that is the kind of information that almost certainly would be disclosed, not only to the leadership, the intelligence leadership, dni, director of cia, head of nsa and others, but also to congressional oversight committees. >> the director est national intelligence clapper says there is no such thing. he flatly denies it. as you know, anynia, we are now reporting that former president obama was irked, upset by this allegation from president trump. do you expect him to go public and respond more forcefully to these charges? >> probably not. that's not really his style. you imagine first foray back into the public eye, probably not a good idea for him to have it be this. probably he's content with james clapper's comments, the former director of national intelligence, his denial, essie essentially sayi -- he is essentially saying there was no campaign mounted.
kevin lewis's statement, president obama's aide basically saying that what trump said was false. so, i doubt that he's going to come out here, former president obama, and try to get into a back and forth with donald trump over this. and obviously we see on the hill as well they are trying to get to the bottom of this, too, subpoena some of the evidence, if necessary, from the department of justice to see if there is any evidence. >> jeffrey, how do you see it, jeffrey? >> i mean, susan knows more about this process than anybody. and she just outlined how you get a wiretap either in the national security area or criminal justice. and the one thing that's in common between the two of them is that there's lots of paper. i mean, there is -- there are affidavits, there are applications. this is a very paper-heavy process. and those papers exist. so, if there is anything involving trump or the trump organization or the trump campaign, any sort of
application -- any sort of wiretap, there will be lots of records that will be relatively easy to find. or they will not exist, meaning the wiretap doesn't exist. >> and the president, president trump, susan, he would have access to those kinds of documents. if he wanted to bring forward evidence of what he claimed saturday morning at 6:30 in the morning, he could easily do that. >> right. that is a little astonishing about the tweet storm. the president, of course, the phone call, the director of the fbi called any head of the executive branch agencies and gotten answers to this question. the notion he would bring these allegations to the public without first knowing the factual basis is a little bit surprising and has aides really scrambling to come up with answers. >> but all indications are he never spoke to the fbi director before or even since he made those startling accusations. >> certainly president trump is the person in the best position to get very, very quick answers as to whether or not his allegations are true or false. >> he doesn't really need a congressional investigation.
if he had the evidence, he could release it within a few minutes if he wanted to do it. everybody stand by. there is more happening right now. we're getting additional information coming into "the situation room." we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. ore i'm in the kitchen. i need my blood sugar to stay in control. i need to shave my a1c i'm always on call. an insulin that fits my schedule is key. ♪ tresiba® ready ♪ (announcer) tresiba® is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which may cause dizziness, swtiting, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar. low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening. injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, fast heartbeat, extreme drowsiness,
swelling of your face, tongue, orhrhroat, dizziness, or confusion. ask your health care provider if you're tresiba® ready. covered by most insurance and medicare plans. ♪ tresiba® ready ♪ afoot and light-hearted i take to the open road. healthy, free, the world before me, the long brown path before me leading wherever i choose. the east and the west are mine. the north and the south are mine. all seems beautiful to me. to take advantage of this offer on a volvo s90, visit your local dealer.
on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. we're back with our political national security [ inaudible ]. susan, let me get back to you. you're a former nsa lawyer, national security lawyer. the leak of the latest cia documents by wikileaks, if
accurate, if true, how damaging could this be to u.s. national security? >> well, frankly it's not quite clear what we're dealing with yet so certainly the information that's already been revealed that haslem ted the potential to compromise sources and methods ongoing collection on targets the cia is currently undertaking. wikileaks has also claimed to have a lot more additional information, including cia targets and the actual tools themselves. not just the description that they have released. if that is true, that has the potential to be devastating in terms of the consequences to national security. however, in the past wikileaks has sort of exaggerated about the substance or significance of its leaks and, so, there is a reason to sort of be skeptical here until we actually see that additional information. >> whatever they have, though, potentially could be very damaging [ inaudible ] revealing sources and methods how the u.s. gathers this kind of information, very damaging potentially if enemies of the u.s. get their hands on this. nia, the white house today explained the difference, sean
spicer -- and i'll play the clip once again -- between why donald trump as a candidate was praising wikileaks -- i love wikileaks he said, as you remember -- why he was praising it then and now they're condemning wikileaks. >> there is a big difference between disclosing podesta -- john podesta's g-mail accounts and back and forth of undermining hillary clinton and his thoughts of her on a personal nature and leaking of classified information. there is a massive, massive difference between those two things. and i think it is, again, the interest and the outrage that occurred last year by a lot of democrats when it came to leaks, it's interesting we're hearing not as much outrage now when it comes to some of our issues of national security. >> he wants to have it both ways, but go ahead. >> he does. this has been a pattern for president trump and donald trump beforehand. did come out against wikileaks a
couple years ago with kelsey manning and some of those leaks, there ought to be some sort of death penalty or something related to those leaks and then of course during the campaign he was very glad to see these leaks because it was helping him. and now you see again this isn't good for him, it's not good for the cia, it's not good for his administration. of course he's going to come out against it. he also i think wants to put a spotlight on the leaks that have been embarrassing to him from the cia, from this white house. so, i think this is going to be what we hear from them, a condemnation of leaks. >> jeffrey, go ahead. >> if i can just add, then candidate trump was praising wikileaks for committing a crime during the campaign. hacking unclassified e-mails is also a crime, as is hacking classified e-mails. so, the idea that there is some big [ inaudible ] between hacking john podesta and hacking the cia, it's -- there is not. both are illegal and the president praised one and is
apparently horrified by the other. >> all right. everybody, stand by. there is more coming up, including a new twist in an international murder mystery. a young man claims to be the son of the assassinated half brother . north korean leader jim jong-un. he just posted a video. we'll tell what you he's saying. that's next. i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change with investment management services.
so this year, they're getting a whole lot more. box 365, the calendar. everyone knows my paperless, safe driver, and multi-car discounts, but they're about to see a whole new side of me. heck, i can get you over $600 in savings. chop, chop. do i look like i've been hurt before? because i've been hurt before. um, actually your session is up. hang on. i call this next one "junior year abroad."
get strange tryst twists in the kim jong-nam case. kim hong sol says in the video he's with his mother and sister but doesn't say where he is. tonight we have new information on the video and the mysterious group which is claiming is projecting kim hong sol. >> my name is kim hong sol from north korea, part of the kim family. here is my passport. my father has been killed a few days ago. i'm currently with my mother and sister. >> reporter: a bizarre video posted online of the son of kim jong-nam, the half brother of kim jong-un. >> we're very grateful to. >> reporter: in the 40-second heavily censored video he thanks people whose names are muted. >> we hope this gets better. >> reporter: he never says where he is.
the group which posted the video is called chill ima civil group. they responded to an emergency request from the family who feared for the safety after he was killed last month at the kuala lumpur airport. >> what this group is trying to do if it's a legislate group, is to send a radical message to senior north korea officials, which is if you intend to escape, don't worry. there is an escape route, we are here, contact us, and we will be here to provide you with protection and assistance. >> reporter: but the motives of the group are unclear. kim hong sol is in his early 20s and told an interviewer in 2012 he was born in pyongyang, moved to macau, but still visited nauks. >> when i was growing up it was isolated. >> reporter: the prime minister
accused kim jong-un of ordering the hit on the brother. president trump's ambassador to the u.n. questioning the sanity of the north korea's leader. >> we are not dealing with a rational person. >> reporter: kim jong-un is not taking credit for the killing. is the brother's son a threat as well. >> from kim jong-un, the one who can pose a challenge despite his age is the son. >> reporter: analysts wonder whether the group is protecting kim hong sol. >> if he is in the custody of a group that is going to try to bring him to south korea that is a very significant problem for the regime. there is no doubt and if that is the case his life is in quite immediate danger. >> reporter: analysts believe his life is in enough danger that it's unlikely he will
travel to malaysia to give a blood sample. the malaysians have required a kin to come in. the north korea insisted the body be handed to them no matter what. the stand by over the body will continue and he will remain in the morgue of the kuala lumpur. >> there is another standoff between north korea and the malaysia over this. >> 11 of its citizens are trying to get out of the area. kim jong-un is not letting them leaving. they said they were being held hostage but backed off the asserts in malaysia they're not letting off three north koreas. they're said to be hold up in north korea's embassy in kuala lumpur. >> coming up, will it be a case of careful what you wish for? lawmakers moving forward on
president trump's claim he was wiretapped and his demand for an investigation. hello, i'm an idaho potato farmer and i finally found our big idaho potato truck. it's been touring the country telling folks about our heart healthy idaho potatoes, america's favorite potatoes, and donating to local charities along the way. but now it's finally back home where it belongs. aw man. hey, wait up. where you goin'? here we go again. won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today.
[and her new business: i do, to jeanetgo. jeanette was excellent at marrying people. but had trouble getting paid. not a good time, jeanette. even worse. now i'm uncomfortable. but here's the good news, jeanette got quickbooks. send that invoice, jeanette. looks like they viewed it. and, ta-da! paid twice as fast. oh, she's an efficient officiant. way to grow, jeanette. new. get paid twice as fast for free. visit quickbooks-dot-com. guests can earn a how cafree night when theypring book direct on choicehotels.com and stay with us just two times? spring time. badda book. badda boom. or... badda bloom. seriously?
happening now. breaking news. not a target. the white house says there is no reason to believe that president trump is the prime focus of any investigation. this is top lawmakers race to review secret cia intelligence about russia's possible ties to the trump campaign. was it warranted? senator lindsey graham is asking the fbi to disclose any evidence related to the president's claim that he was wiretapped by president obama. will it take subpoenas to get
answers? full sell mode. the white house says president trump is determined to push the gop healthcare bill through congress. can they get in line or will there be a political bloodbath. and dinner cruise as the president tried to rally support. he's breaking bread with former rival ted cruz. will any offer be on the table. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in the "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. we're following breaking news on the investigation into russia's election meddling and possible ties to the trump campaign. the top democratic on the senate intelligence committee, mark warner, says he has even more questions tonight after poring over classified information