tv CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield CNN March 19, 2017 12:00pm-1:01pm PDT
just in to cnn, three of those holdouts were spotted meeting with white house senior staff yesterday at mar-a-lago in florida. house speaker paul ryan insisted this morning he's not worried about the bill passing. >> the president is being -- bringing people to his table, and i'm impressed with how the president is helping us close this bill, making the improvements that we've been making, getting the votes. we feel very good where we are. >> we're covering all the angles with our team of reporters and political experts. let's begin with cnn washington correspondent ryan nobles. so ryan, what are lawmakers saying about alleged ties between the trump campaign and russia leading into tomorrow's hearing? >> reporter: yeah, these hearings are really going to mark a flash point in the ongoing controversy about russia as they tend to influence the american election. and while there's been a lot of attention paid to the president's claim that president obama tapped him at trump tower, the bigger reveal may be if investigators have found any evidence of the russians working directly with the trump
campaign. this is something the administration has forcefully denied. the republican house chair of the intel committee, devin nunez, says there's not evidence of collusion, but his democratic counterpart, adam schiff, is not so sure. listen to him on "meet the press." >> there is circumstantial evidence of collusion. there is direct evidence, i think, of deception. that's where we begin the investigation. i don't want to prejudge where we ultimately end up, and of course there's one thing to say there's evidence, there's another to say we can prove this beyond a reasonable doubt or there's enough evidence to bring to a grand jury for purposes of a criminal indictment. but there is certainly enough for us to conduct an investigation. >> reporter: and this is important because this is really where the divide could break down this congressional investigation. if the findings of the committee break down over party lines, that's where there is danger that the whole probe could be just written off by critics as
being too political. it's something the leaders of both the house and senate intel committees have promised that they will work to avoid. we may find out tomorrow at this hearing if keeping that promise will even be possible. >> all right. ryan nobles, thank you very much for that. let's discuss this with my political panel. joining me, patrick healy, cnn political analyst and deputy culture editor for "the new york times." david rhodes, cnn global affairs analyst and national security investigations editor for reuters. good to see both of you. this chorus of now said getting louder on the eve of the pivotal testimony from fbi director james comey. just listen. >> president doesn't go and physically wiretap something. so if you take the president literally, it didn't happen. >> no evidence of any wiretapping of trump tower? >> no -- there was no fiza warrant that i'm aware of to tap trump tower. >> i hope we can put an end to this wild goose chase because what the president said was just patently false, and the wrecking
ball it created now has banged into our british and german allies, it's continuing to grow in terms of damage. he needs to put an end to this. >> so james comey is under a lot of pressure. how much detail can he reveal when he testifies? >> there's going to be real reluctance. i mean, traditionally the fbi director does not speak about ongoing investigations. that's something that director comey could be citing here. but the issue is is that for millions of americans, there's going to be still pretty fresh memory about how director comey talked about the investigations that hillary clinton was under back last summer, in 2016. and then as he made his statement in a letter just before the november election, sort of saying that, well, they were still looking into questions regarding hillary clinton. i think you'll see a lot of democrats challenging director comey if he decides to say, you
know, i'm going to keep this general, i'm not going to go into whether even president trump or his campaign is under some kind of investigation regarding russia. but what you can be guaranteed is that both republicans and democrats are going to want answers from their different angles. and one of the things that unites them is this wiretapping question that is still out there. and it sounds like director comey does want to address. he wanted the justice department to knock it down. so whether he's willing to go on record and really kind of undercut the president and the white house is one of the main things we'll be looking for. >> right. and one has to wonder, david, since he went to the attorney general, the justice department to say, hey, knock this stuff down. that didn't happen. if he feels even more compelled to try to put this to rest, try to reveal as much of -- of these allegations that he can, you know, possible especially after you have this chorus of those
who say there is no evidence. >> yeah. i think he will speak out. he had, frankly, a disastrous summer. people close to him told me that he -- he made the first statement in july, criticizing hillary clinton's handling of emails. but not charging her with any criminal wrong doing. he thought his own personal stature would end the controversy. that didn't happen. the letters that patrick talked about has democrats angry at him. i think he will be open tomorrow in an effort to kind of defend the credibility of the fbi. that's what he claims is his main mission. >> so meantime from the president's point of view, by pushing these claims despite no evidence, you know, how much is the president hurting his relationship with republicans? i ask this because, you know, this is what some of them have said this week. >> i think the president should -- president obama is over an apology in that regard because, you know, if he didn't do it, we shouldn't be, you know, reckless in accusations that he did.
>> a president only has so much political capital to expend and so much moral authority, as well. any time your credibility takes a hit, i think in many ways it weakens the officeholder. >> if the president has evidence, i wish he could share it with us. i haven't seen evidence of mass voter fraud, and i have not seen evidence of wiretapping by president obama. >> all right. patrick, all this at a time when republicans are also, you know, trying to push through their agenda. is the president hurting that confidence, credibility, not just of himself but the entire party perhaps? >> the credibility issue is -- is real and is significant. it seems like i think what a lot of those republicans who we just heard from, you know, who we talked to, they're trying to send the message to the president more about his twitter behavior, i think, than suggesting, well, because of this behavior we're not going to pass your budget or we're going to, you know, have a problem with you on repealing and replacing obamacare. the reality is republicans want to enact an agenda that
president trump has largely signed on to. they want to enact a new health care law. they want this hard look and hit on discretionary spending, at least -- at least some of them do. they want tax reform. they're not going to write off the president because of, you know, some of his tweets. but what they want to do is basically send a message that says you're not helping us, you're not helping the party, you're not helping your agenda, and you're not helping your own credibility, president trump, when you tweet out these things and don't have any evidence. >> and then, david, there's the credibility of the united states on the world stage. might these hearings help repair some damage caused? >> they might. i mean, i -- there's a danger it will just devolve into a political divide with democrats saying there's evidence of collusion and republicans saying there's not. but back to this point on president trump -- we just, you know, broke investigative story this weekend. the president said in the past he had no business ties with
russia. we looked into, you know, who had bought into his buildings in the united states. we found nearly $100 million in investment from dozens of members of the russian elite just in his buildings in florida. we didn't find any wrongdoing on the president's part. again, he makes these statements -- i have flow business ties with russia, his organization wouldn't sort of disclose to us how much money he made personally from these investments. and it's just this problem of sort of overstatement, a lack of disclosure that does undermine his credibility. it wastes political capital as those republicans said. >> it will be a bigger problem if collusion, as we heard adam schiff, says -- as we heard him say if it's substantiated in any way, that's a bigger problem. president trump remains pretty defiant on the wiretapping thing. that the president -- the previous president obama is to blame. this is trump on fox just last night. >> been very nice to me personally, but his people haven't been nice.
and there's great animosity out there, there's great anger. leaking is just one example of it. in some cases, a very serious example of it. but leaking and the -- the level of anger is hard to believe. so while he's nice personally, there doesn't seem to be a lot of nice things happening behind the scenes. >> david, is this more personal than it is political? >> i think it's political. i mean, these are -- this is a former president and the current president of the united states. look, it's political. it's calling into credibility -- questioning the credibility of the people who are leaking these things to the news media. i -- i got a leak -- we wrote a story about president trump's first phone call with president putin. there was some details the white house didn't like in our story, they said they were going to do a leak investigation. that source was for me, was a sort of a public servant who was, you know, disturbed by the tenor of that call. but you know, the white house is going to discredit those -- that kind of person as somehow being
pro-obama. in this one case, and i can speak about this one case, this is a longtime public servant, served republicans and democrats. but yes, it's political, it's whose message is going to win out. >> patrick, do you agree? political or personal? >> i think it ultimately it's political. i mean, you have only a couple weeks to go, president trump saying -- weeks ago, president trump saying president obama was a bad or sick guy. now he geeoes on fox and says w get along pretty well personally, but it's these unnamed figures behind the scenes who are leaking and trying to discredit me. i mean, you can't go from calling your predecessor, former president of the united states, a bad or sick guy and flip and say, no, we get along okay. and it doesn't seem political. >> yeah. previous, even on inauguration day, he talked about how gracious and kind he was. something eor some things have changed. >> if it's saturday, one thing. if it's monday, another.
the question is does it help a president's credibility? a lot of republicans say no. >> thank you very much, gentlemen, appreciate it. tonight is cnn's special preview of tomorrow's all-important hearing on capitol hill. john berman kicking off our special at 11:00 p.m. eastern time right here on cnn. also happening this week, the house will vote on the obamacare replacement plan. and cnn is learning that three key gop holdouts of that plan met at mar-a-lago with senior white house staff just yesterday. what that may signal for the fate of the bill next. two become one. then you're a couple. think of all you'll share... like snoring. does your bed do that? the dual adjustability of a sleep number bed allows you each to choose the firmness and comfort you want. so every couple can get the best sleep ever. does your bed do that?
right now, find queen mattresses starting at just $899. plus, free home delivery on select mattresses. ends sunday! only at a sleep number store or sleepnumber.com >>psst. hey... where you going? we've got that thing! you know...diarrhea? abdominal pain? but we said we'd be there... woap, who makes the decisions around here? it's me. don't think i'll make it. stomach again...send! if you're living with frequent, unpredictable diarrhea and abdominal pain, you may have irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea
or ibs-d - a condition that can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi. a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage both diarrhea and abdominal pain at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have or may have had pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a blockage of your bowel or gallbladder. if you are taking viberzi, you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d... with viberzi. ( ♪ ) upstate new york is a good place to pursue your dreams. at vicarious visions, i get to be creative, work with awesome people, and we get to make great games. ( ♪ ) what i like about the area, feels like everybody knows each other. and i can go to my local coffee shop and they know who i am. it's really cool.
new york state is filled with bright minds like lisa's. to find the companies and talent of tomorrow, search for our page, jobsinnewyorkstate on linkedin. search for our page, has been a struggle. i considered all my options with my doctor, who recommended once-daily toujeo®. now i'm on the path to better blood sugar control. toujeo® is a long-acting insulin from the makers of lantus®. it releases slowly, providing consistent insulin levels for a full 24 hours, proven full 24-hour blood sugar control, and significant a1c reduction. and along with toujeo®, i'm eating better and moving more. toujeo® is a long-acting, man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. allergic reaction may occur and may be life threatening. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens, even if the needle has been changed. the most common side effect is low blood sugar,
which can be serious and life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily while using toujeo®. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose or type of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor if you take other medicines and about all your medical conditions. insulins, including toujeo®, in combination with tzds (thiazolidinediones) may cause serious side effects like heart failure that can lead to death, even if you've never had heart failure before. don't dilute or mix toujeo® with other insulins or solutions as it may not work as intended and you may lose blood sugar control, which could be serious. toujeo® helps me stay on track with my blood sugar. ask your doctor about toujeo®. a crucial vote on the house gop's health care bill happens this thursday. president trump has a lot riding on its passing. the teams and leaders are working overtime making changes that could woo undecided lawmakers. cnn has learned that three
leading conservatives who have opposed the bill in the past were meeting at mar-a-lago on saturday. athena jones was there, and do we know if minds were changed? >> reporter: hi, fred. not yet clear on whether though minds were changed. i'll get to yesterday's meeting in one moment. just the big picture here. let's play what house speaker paul ryan had to say about all of this this morning on fox news. he sounded confident that they were going to succeed in getting enough gop members on board to get this bill passed. take a listen. >> we feel very good where we are. we're still having conversations with our members, we're making, fine tuning improvements to the bill to reflect people's concerns, to reflect people's improvements. the president, you say people being at the seat of the table. the president is being -- bringing people to his table. i'm impressed with how the president is helping us close this bill, making the improvements that we've been making, getting the votes. we feel very good where we are.
>> reporter: so there you heard speaker ryan talk about conversations that republican leaders on capitol hill and white house officials are having with members. that's exactly what went down at mar-a-lago yesterday. three conservatives, ted cruz and mike lee and congressman mike meadows, vocal in their opposition to this bill, people who have been arguing that it doesn't go far enough in undoing the affordable care act. those three came down to mar-a-lago and met with the president's chief strategist, steve bannon, and chief of staff reince priebus. we're told the meeting lasted for three hours. and that the the -- an aide, a senior republican aide familiar with the meeting told my colleague, lauren fox, that the meeting was intense and productive. they said that steve bannon was receptive to some of the concerns these conservative members of congress talked about. priebus is, reince priebus was pushing the approach that house speaker paul ryan is advocating. we know that they want more done to repeal the affordable care
act. among the ideas offered during the meeting, the idea of phasing out medicaid sooner. that is something conservatives want to see. so far that's not changing, although they are making other changes to how states handle medicaid funds and the program. these -- these members of congress also wanted to see other regulations repealed like the requirement that health plans cover certain essential health benefits and the provision that 26-year-old children can stay on their parents' plan until the age of 26. they want that undone. that's something the president supports. that seems less likely. the point here is that the white house and republican leaders on capitol hill are doing their best to try to allay the concerns of folks in their parties so -- so they can cobble together enough votes to get this bill through the house. >> all right, athena jones, thank you very much. so the proposed changes to medicaid have been a key sticking point of the president's american health care act. republican critics say states want more flexibility within the
program. health and human services secretary dr. tom price defending the plan this morning with jake tapper. >> it sounds utopian. but i have to say, you criticized the medicaid program bounce one in three doctors don't -- because one in three doctors don't take medicaid patients, but the reason that they don't, according to experts, is because the reimbursement rate is so low. i don't know how you're going to improve medicaid if you're taking money away from medicaid. the problem is that doctors are not getting paid enough, and you're saying, okay, but we're going to do better with less money. and i don't know an economist who thinks that's going to work. >> every time you -- you peel back that onion a little and you drill down and look at it specifically, you can see where there are wonderful opportunities for improvement in the system. the medicaid program actually covers four different groups in our population. seniors, disabled, healthy moms, and kids. and yet what the federal government says to the states is, you must treat those healthy moms and kids. you must have a plan for those
healthy moms and kids that's exactly the same as the seniors and the disabled. that doesn't make sense to anybody who's looking at this -- not just health care economists or individuals who are experts on financing and delivery of health care, but the common american ordinary people say, well, that doesn't make any sense if you're caring for moms and kids in the same way you're caring for disabled and the aged. so think about -- imagine a system, if you will, that actually responds to the needs of those healthy moms and kids in a much more flexible and responsive manner. you could save huge amounts of money so that you've got greater resources to care for those who are aged and disabled. >> here to discuss mit economics professor jonathan grouper. he is one of the key architects of obamacare. all right. so you just heard from dr. price there. and he talked about how it -- it's not cost effective for a healthy mother with children to be paying the same or benefiting in the same manner as a disabled or elderly person.
is he right? >> well, first of all, he's wrong that they're treated the same. the medicaid program is not one monolithic program. indeed, the first thing about the medicaid program is 80% of people in medicaid get their care from private managed care organizations. it's not even a government-delivered plan anymore. those managed care organizations deliver care very differently to children and mothers and the elderly and disabled. so he's wrong. second of all, if there are problems in medicaid -- and of course there are problems. any program could be improved. there is no evidence, none, that cutting the program by 25% which is what this proposal does, would improve the program in any way. jake tapper pointed out it already pays physicians and hospitals poorly. therefore, if you cut reimbursement, what's going to lap to nonpartisan cbo is they're going to kick people off the program. >> do you think that a revision in obamacare should be that perhaps more doctors' offices would provide -- providing more of an incentive so instead of just one out of three medicaid
patients being cared for, that the number would increase? >> well, first of all, it's -- one-third of doctors don't see medicaid patients. let's get the facts right. two-thirds do. it's two out of three doctors who will see it. i think that if you pay doctors more -- in fact, i've done research to show that if you pay doctors more, more doctors will see medicaid patients. i think ideally we would. but it's basically a budget game. you've got to decide how to devote your dollars. right now i think medicaid is working well. actually, if you ask medicaid recipients, they have a higher satisfaction with their plan than those with private insurance. once again, you hear all these horror tales from price and others about medicaid's terrible. but you know what, ask the people, you ask the people and they are more satisfied with medicaid than people with private insurance. i think our first priority is not to take that away, but rather to build on it. >> what are the areas that you believe need to be built on? how in your view should this plan, obamacare, since you were the architect or one of the architects behind it, be improved? >> i think the first step is to
actually implement obamacare. what do i mean by that? obamacare featured medicaid expansions to ensure that every low-income american had access to affordable health care. 20 states or 19 states have still not unacted medicaid expansions. if they do, three good things happen. first of all, low-income americans get health insurance. second of all, states get a massive injection of funds from the federal government, improving their state economies. and third of all, you get a situation where sick people come out of the exchanges into medicaid, improving the health and exchanges and lowering premiums. >> the vice president -- go ahead. >> and the second thing is once again, republicans have undercut this very law because this law included money to insurers to help them function in this new volatile market. republicans have not honored those obligations, and that's part of why prumts have gone up -- premiums have gone up, as well. >> yesterday, the vice president while visiting in florida said that federal funding should not help support medicaid, but it really should be up to states to
address that. why do you dispute that? >> well, i dispute that because states can't afford it. look, the federal government has always helped fund medicaid -- >> it sounds like you're saying they can. >> well, they can't. i mean, literal at the's just -- this is already the biggest budget item in every single state or most states. certainly, nationally it's the biggest item. the fastest growing item. if you pull the federal support back, states can't fill that in. they literally can't. they -- and that's once again, that's not just me, that's all experts, the correctional budget office saying if you pull that support from states, they will kick people off the program. this is not a simple, oh, there's some magical efficiencies that tom price talks about and obfuscates and says there's four different groups. forget it. the bottom line is you have a program which is bare bones, which if you cut it, people will lose the program, and there's no other alternative. >> professor jonathan gruber, thank you very much for your time. >> my pleasure. all right. trump's pick for the u.s. supreme court heads to capitol hill for his confirmation hearing tomorrow. up next, the biggest hurdles ahead for neil gorsuch.
president trump's pick for supreme court will be on capitol hill tomorrow for the start of his confirmation hearing. and neil gore simpsuch could ber several days of intense questioning. the president tapped the colorado appellate judge to replace the late antonin scalia. on the eve of the hearing, many democrats are expressing serious doubts about gorsuch. >> i think many of my colleagues are skeptical but waiting for the hearings. i have touched base with a good number of my colleagues after the hearings. i intend to make my views very
strongly known to them. each member will make his or her own decision. but i think there's a great deal of skepticism in the caucus about judge gorsuch based on his record. >> let's talk more about this with cnn supreme court reporter arianna vogue and legal attorney page pate. so what is expected tomorrow? >> you know, these supreme court confirmation hearings, they represent the first and really the last chance for congress to grill a potential nominee. remember, if gorsuch is confirmed, he gets life tenure. he's almost untouchable. so you'll see the republicans going hard on his paper trail, examining his opinions. they really like opinions on religious liberty and other issues. democrats, they're kinds of -- they're kind of in a tough position. they're furious that obama's nominee, merit garland, didn't get a hearing.
they also know here that they're basically replacing a conservative with a conservative. they're returning the court to the status quo before scalia's death. they may decide to save some firepower in case trump gets another retirement sometime down the road of a more liberal justice. >> so page, you know, on gorsuch, chuck schumer said there's a lot of skepticism. is there large concern about whether gorsuch would be able to rein in the executive branch, particularly as it pertains to potential upcoming cases involving the travel ban? that there may be favoritism. is that why there might be skepticism? >> i think they're certainly concerned about the potential for that. these days, everything is going to be confrontational in washington, especially with a supreme court pick. i think with neil gorsuch, you get a judge who is a little bit hostile to the idea of an expansive executive power. he has ruled in other cases that he does not think the courts
should have to defer to an agency's interpretation of its own rules. so in that way, you may see him push back against a president. when he was in george w. bush's justice department, he was one of the key legal backers of the enhanced interrogation and the memos that they wrote on the war on terror. in that way, i could see him as a big proponent of what trump is trying to do in connection with the muslim ban. >> so senatored at the cruz talked about -- senator ted cruz talked about the upcoming hearing and felt confident that republicans can confirm him despite democrats' skepticism. here's what he had to say this morning -- >> you know, i think it's 50/50 whether the democrats filibuster it. they don't have any good arguments against gorsuch. they're furious that we're going to have a conservative nominated and confirmed. i'll tell you this -- judge gorsuch will be confirmed. he will either get 60 votes and be confirmed, or otherwise whatever procedural steps are necessary, i believe within a month or two, neil gorsuch will be an associate justice of the
supreme court. >> so what is the potential about a potential filibuster even? >> well, you know, it -- it's hard to tell. and it depends how hard they will go at him in these hearings. you'll know there's a ritual that goes on in these confirmation hearings. the senators try to get him on hot button issues, abortion, gay marriage, immigration. he's likely to dodge those kind of questions, to guard his impartiality. but when we see the tenor of the democrats monday and really tuesday, we'll get a sense of how hard they will go at the end of the day and whether they're going to really try their best to block this nominee or save something for a potential next nominee. >> and oftentimes you don't know much about the personal opinions about the supreme court justice or even a nominee, page. so in the case of gorsuch, we did get a chance to hear that he was disappointed with donald trump's criticism of judges, particularly, you know, as it pertains to issues that donald
trump has been passionate about. might that bode well for him, particularly among those who are skeptical of him? >> i think so. i think that was a critical comment. it really shows you what he thinks as a judge. and almost any judge was going to be upset by what the president said about a so-called judge. neil gorsuch is a judge's judge in many ways. he's very faithful to the rule of law. even if you don't agree with him on certain political issues, i think you're going to find that he is probably the best out of the possible picks that we could have gotten for this president, as far as someone who's going to try to weigh both sides and try to decide a case based on the law instead of politics. >> all right. thank you very much, page. appreciate it. hearings start tomorrow. north korea is calling last night's successful testing of a new high-thrust rocket engine a great leap forward. what does this mean for u.s./north korea tensions? that's next. nosy neighbor with a glad bag, full of trash. what happens next? nothing.
i trained as hard as i could to stay alive. i have more than 30 pieces of shrapnel still in my leg. but i still push myself to the limit. if it weren't for my tempur-pedic, i wouldn't be able to sleep on my left side at all. my unit put in a special request to get one and i realized that tempur-pedic was exponentially better than anything else. it gave me a huge performance advantage, it still does. tempur-pedic. this sleep is power.
won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car
and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. an unlimited data plan is only as good as the network it's on. and verizon has been ranked number one for the 7th time in a row by rootmetrics. (man) hey, uh, what's rootmetrics? it's the nation's largest independent study and it ranked verizon #1 in call, text, data, speed and reliability. (woman) do they get a trophy? not that i know of. but you get unlimited done right. (man 2) why don't they get a trophy? (man 3) they should get something. (woman 2) how about a plaque? i have to drop this. my arm's getting really tired. unlimited on verizon. 4 lines, just $45 per line. with 9 lobster dishes.est is back try succulent new lobster mix & match or see how sweet a lobster lover's dream can be. there's something for everyone and everyone's invited. so come in soon.
an attack in afghanistan has left three u.s. soldiers wounded. u.s. officials say they came under fire from an afghan soldier who was killed by coalition forces. the attack happened near a military base in helmand province. no word on the condition of the three soldiers. in southeast asia, secretary of state rex tillerson is on his way home after meeting with chinese president xi jinping this morning. xi urged more coordination on what he called regional hot spots. it's being called a friendly meeting, but cnn has learned that away from the cameras, the conversation between the two turned very candid. hours before the meeting took place, north korea claimed success in testing a new type of rocket engine. the u.s. has repeatedly called on beijing to use its leverage to help rein in north korea. tillerson said on his trip that the u.s. is prepared to consider military options if provoked by north korea. and in russia, all eyes will be on tomorrow's congressional
testimony in the u.s. where fbi director james comey will answer questions over the trump campaign's possible collusion with russia during the 2016 election. cnn's fred pleitgen is in moscow. fred, what is the mooted on the ground there in -- the mood on the ground in in terms of how closely people will be watching? >> reporter: it's interesting because we asked senior russian officials just that -- how concerned were they about things that could be mentioned or said during the congressional hearings. they said in the form of the spokesman for putin that they wouldn't be watching the hearings at all. that they had other things to do and believed nothing new would come out of them. of course, they are going to be watching them very closely. we expect that there will be reactions to some of the things that will be said tomorrow. you can feel the us fromration in moscow among the russian leadership. many of them hoping that the topic about the possible ties between donald trump and the russians would simply go away. here's what we found out when we were on the streets of moscow.
does president trump really have any ties to the russian government? did russia really meddle in the u.s. election? questions that persist in the u.s. but that many russians wish would just go away. we got unnerved reactions on the streets of moscow. "no, of course we're not interfering in any election," this woman says. and this man adds, "in russia, we have an old saying -- a bad dancer always has an excuse. the americans blame russia for everything. it's not true." "i like americans," he says. "they're normal people, but this is just crazy. if they say all this, it means that russia is more powerful than the u.s." russian mostly state-run media has been lashing out at western coverage of the trump/russia relationship especially at cnn. vladimir putin's spokesman lamenting what he called american hysteria. >> fact that russia is being
demonized in that sense comes very strange to us. we are really sorry about that. >> reporter: all this after both donald trump and vladimir putin expressed mutual admiration during the campaign. >> translator: he is a brilliant and intelligent person without a doubt. >> in terms of leadership, he's getting an a. >> reporter: russian officials acknowledged they were pleased when donald trump beat hillary clinton in the u.s. election. they also expected results -- better u.s./russian relations and possibly an easing of sanctions slapped on russia over the ukraine crisis. now that hope is fading, one expert says. >> they were giving him a chance. they still are giving him a chance. but they're becoming more realistic about trump, about the united states and more generally, i think that basically they're not looking for a major breakthrough. >> reporter: the narrative about russia being demonized by the u.s. was some of the things
being said. that is something that is broadly used here by russian politicians. of course, also by that russian state-owned media. again, many people here had been hoping that with the trump administration and office that there would be real progress in u.s./russian relations and that progress would have started very quickly. of course, that hasn't materialized yet. >> so in your conversations with people, largely is there a feeling that these accusations about russia's potential involvement really does kind of embolden or even make putin appear to be more powerful or even popular? >> reporter: yeah, that's one of the interesting things that we found out when we've been speaking to people. that it certainly hasn't hurt his popularity in this country. many people believe that he seems a lot stronger than they had even thought before. many saying that if the americans really feel that russia meddled in their election, that russia could have maybe changed the outcome of the election in the u.s., that it
would make vladimir putin appear very, very powerful. it certainly hasn't hurt vladimir putin at all. you can feel a lot of people rushing to vladimir putin's and the government's defz whense wh the accusations come out. >> fred pleitgen, appreciate it. tonight, john berman has a live review of james comey's testimony on russia and trump's wiretapping claims. at that tonight, 11:00 p.m. eastern time here on cnn. we'll be right back. ♪ announcer: get on your feet for the nastiest bull in the state of texas. ♪ ♪
why are you checking i want to see if it changed. credit scores don't change that much do they? really? i'll take it! sir, your credit... is great, right? when was the last time you checked? yeah, i better check my credit score. here, try credit karma. it's free. alright, no more surprises. credit karma. give yourself some credit.
my name is danita seaton. i'm a gas service representative for pg&e here in oakland. when i work in oakland, i feel like i'm home, because i grew up here in oakland, my family still lives here. every time i go to the customer's house, i treat them like they're my family. if they smell gas, or they don't have hot water, i'm there to ensure that by the time that i leave, they feel safe and they can go back to their day to day life. to learn more about gas safety in your home, visit pge.com/safety together, we're building a better california.
tonight in "believer," raza ventures to haiti to explore the roots of voodoo and the rising influence of evangelical churches. >> how did you reconnect with voodoo? how did that happen? >> they got connected to me. >> they found you? >> yeah. for me, was really a defining moment because i wanted to come back to haiti. >> i feel like catholicism in haiti has come to terms with voodoo in a way that protestant christianity has not. >> you're still the devil for them -- >> you're still the devil for them. but haitians are believing it and adopting that message. >> true. because it's drilled into their skull. they're giving them food for faith, but i do believe that we need to be respected because i don't go and attack their religion. just respect the fact that i
worship my ancestors. they were free people in africa minding their business. invaders came and took everything from them. the only thing that they brought with them was voodoo. and i believe that their lives and the sacrifice of their lives was not done in . >> reza aslan joining me now. what was the most eye-opening experience for you in haiti as it pertains to voodoo? >> i went to haiti with so many preconceptions about voodoo, what you see on tv, and what i found was a deeply beautiful religious tradition that has deep roots, not just in the afro caribbean tradition, but especially in haiti, voodoo is
how haiti became free, it's how it broke off the shackles of slavery against the french, so it goes to the core identity of what it means to be haitian and it's under attack right now. >> i think the misconceptions when people think about voodoo dolls, the manipulation of someone's soul, that sort of thing. what did you discover? >> here's the thing about voodoo, voodoo believes that there isn't a separation between the spiritual and physical world. that they are part of us. if you invite them, they will take over your body and give you an opportunity to connect with the world beyond ours. all you have to do is ask, and it's called mounting and it's sort of the goal of a voodoo ceremony and i got an opportunity to experience what that is like. >> what do you mean?
>> up close and personal. i mean i took part in a 10-hour voodoo ceremony which was just one of the most incredible spiritual experiences of my life. and during that ceremony, various people around me were mounted by these spirits. and i could see that everything about them changed, not just their facial expressions, their very essence changed, being close to that, it was an extraordinary experience. i could feel the power that was emanating from that temple, from that ceremony, it was unlike anything i ever experienced. >> was there ever a moment during all of that when you were even doubting it or you had a hard time believing it was true or did you embrace it all the way because of the subject you were talking about, being mounted? >> i take faith very seriously. i go in very open, it's sort of
the deal that i make with these communities, let me in and i will be a part of it. but i'll be honest, i'm seeing these things around me and i don't know how to respond, but when i see a mounted priest come up to me and start to feed me the blood of a sacrificed animal, speak to me in a language i don't understand. put his hands on me and try to get me to feel what he feels, there is a part of me in the middle of that experience that is just taken over by it, car carried away by it. and it really pops off the screen. we did a lot of amazing episodes, this one is my favorite. >> voodoo is one thing, you also talk about the role of the evangelicals during the earthquake in haiti. >> the vast majority of evangelical groups are doing a great job rebuilding haiti, but
there's a core group who are there to rid the island of vi o voodoo, they believe that all of haiti's problems is what they would refer to is a pact with the devil that haitians have made as a result of voodoo. so there's a concerted effort to really strip the island of voodoo all together. and we have this group of voodooists doing earning in their power to make sure that doesn't happen, they talk to their children, it's everything but a losing battle. they have the faith, but they don't have the money that these evangelical missionaries have. >> thank you so much, good to see you. >> take care. >> so in tonight's new episode of "believer" reza is in haiti to explore the misunderstood religion of voodoo and to tap
into the evangelical influence in haiti as well. that's tonight at 10:00 here on cnn. we have so much straight ahead in the newsroom right after this. approximate ♪ hi, i'm frank. i take movantik for oic, opioid-induced constipation. had a bad back injury, my doctor prescribed opioids which helped with the chronic pain, but backed me up big-time. tried prunes, laxatives, still constipated... had to talk to my doctor. she said, "how long you been holding this in?" (laughs)
that was my movantik moment. my doctor told me that movantik is specifically designed for oic and can help you go more often. don't take movantik if you have a bowel blockage or a history of them. movantik may cause serious side effects, including symptoms of opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain and/or diarrhea, and tears in the stomach or intestine. tell your doctor about any side effects and about medicines you take. movantik may interact with them causing side effects. why hold it in? have your movantik moment. talk to your doctor about opioid-induced constipation. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.
( ♪ ) it just feels like anything is possible here in upstate new york. ( ♪ ) at corning, i test smart glass that goes all over the world. but there's no place like home. there's always something different to do like skiing in the winter, jet skiing in the summer. we can do everything. new york state is filled with bright minds like samantha's. to find the companies and talent of tomorrow, search for our page, jobsinnewyorkstate on linkedin.
. hello again, everyone. president trump gears up for what could be one of the most consequential weeks of his presidency. it all starts tomorrow on capitol hill when fbi chief james comey testifies before congress. the focus, the trump campaign's possible ties with russia during the election and president
trump's claims that he was wiretapped by president obama. republicans are distancing themselves from the president saying there's no evidence. >> was there a physical wiretapping of trump tower? there never was. >> there's no evidence of anything that you just described. >> do you know of any evidence to support that allegation? >> jake, not that i have seen and not that i'm aware of. >> also happening this week, the preside president's pick for supreme court has his hearings. and the question remains, can trump court reluctant members of his own party? just yesterday, three of those holdouts met with white house senior staff at mara la go. house speaker paul ryan insisted he's not worried about the