tv Erin Burnett Out Front CNN March 23, 2017 4:00pm-5:01pm PDT
police say the new zealand call, they got information it came from israel, as was australia. and as they got the investigation, it led them to this home and that is where police made that arrest this morning. >> oren liebermann in jerusalem. thanks very much. that's it for me. thanks very much for watching. our breaking news coverage continues with kate balduan filling in on "erin burnett outfront". >> "outfront" next, breaking news. republicans huddling right now behind closed doors after an embarrassing setback, calling off their planned vote on the very big health care bill. can president trump get this deal done? plus, a top democrat says he has seen new information on possible collusion between trump associates and russia, enough that it would warrant a grand jury investigation. and why was president trump in the driver's seat of a big rig today? let's go "outfront." good evening, everybody. i'm kate balduan in for erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, we have breaking news. no vote.
the vote to repeal and replace obamacare was planned to be up for an historic vote tonight. no more. the reason, republicans simply don't have the votes. cnn's latest count has 30 house republicans either definite nos or leaning that way. the math is simple. republicans can only afford the lose no more than 21 from their party, because, of course, democrats aren't voting for it. so, now what? the house speaker is huddling right now with his entire party behind closed doors to figure that out. a sign of just how high the stakes are for the president tonight, a full-court press from the white house. steve bannon, reince priebus, the budget director, mick mulvaney, all over at the capital, trying to twist arms, as well. the freedom caucus, a group of conservatives is the linchpin right now. the 40 members have frustrated the white house and congressional leaders, as they have the numbers to either push this thing through, or force the bill to fall apart completely. the question right now, though, is at what cost? moments ago with, the chairman of the freedom caucus says, they haven't given up yet.
>> i can tell you at this point, we are trying to get another 30 to 40 votes that are currently in the "no" category to "yes." once we do that, i think we can move forward with passing it on the house floor. >> the white house says there will be a vote tomorrow, but is that just wishful thinking at this point? sunlen serfaty is "outfront" tonight on capitol hill. sunlen, what can you tell us about this critical meeting that's happening right now? >> reporter: it is such a critical meeting, kate, happening behind closed doors. we've been watching lawmakers go in right at this moment. the republican leadership is trying to get a sense, in essence, from their conference, how many votes they have, where their members are, and as the white house is pushing for this vote to happen tomorrow morning, the leadership is not committing to that time frame much of that will depend on what happens in that room tonight. the republicans' health care bill thrust into a precarious state of limbo. >> they're not going to pass the bill. >> reporter: with no deal and no plan "b," speaker ryan is trying
to buy time, forced to delay a vote long scheduled for today. a signal he still doesn't have the votes to pass the bill. >> are you a "yes" yet? >> i'm not going to address that. >> reporter: the biggest obstacle, the hard-right house freedom caucus. >> we have not gotten enough of our members to get to yes at this point. under what we're currently considering. however, i would say, progress is being made. >> reporter: republican leadership in the white house making a major 11th hour concession, placating the group to get their support. agreeing to eliminate essential health benefits in the bill, an obamacare provision that requires insurers to cover benefits, like maternity, mental health, and prescription drugs among others. by after returning from a meeting with president trump today -- >> there were no new concessions. >> reporter: house freedom caucus members say, that's not enough. >> doing essential health benefits without changing other
parts of the bill would actually make the bill worse. >> what other parts do you want changed? >> you need to look at community rating and other aspects of the insurance mandates. you can't change one part. they all interact. >> reporter: the white house and republican leadership have been standing firm, saying this is their final offer on the table. it's up to the house freedom caucus to accept or reject it. which doesn't sit well with some. >> look, we've been told three weeks ago it was take it or leave it, so this is not a new -- that would not be a, you know, a revelation that that's what's being proposed. >> reporter: huddling back on the hill today -- >> in order to get to yes, we have to bend the cost curve down. that's as simple as it is. >> reporter: house freedom caucus members say they want a assurances in the white house that in the short-term, premiums and other costs will go down. but those last minute concessions to skrves risk the support among moderate republicans who were previously a yes. >> i never quite understood the mad rush. i think it's important that we
get this right, rather than get it done fast. >> and tonight, the congressional budget office is out with a new estimate of the cost and coverage of the changes of the bill. the revisions mean the bill would cost more and still leaves 24 million fewer people uninsured next decade than under the current law. and to note, this cost estimate is just based on those amendment. those changes that were made earlier in the week, not these latest revisions. these latest potential appeasements to members of the house conservatives to woo them to get on to the bill. >> we don't have a final bill, we don't have a final cost estimate. great to see you, sunlen. we're keeping an eye on all the lawmakers walking past sunlen into that room. here, mo brooks, a member of the house freedom caucus will be joining us in just one second. he just wrapped up a huddle before the house speaker before he's getting ready to walk into that meeting. jeff, is the white house still confident they can seal this deal tonight? >> kate, they are still
confident they can seal the deal, not only, and they're not sure when that will be. they still hope the vote will come tomorrow. but, of course, that is up to the scheduling of the republican leadership. not here at the white house. but it is one of the reasons, all the top advisers here have spent the last several hours or so on capitol hill, meeting with some of these lawmakers, and the message we are told from some of those republican lawmakers is, the white house top officials are saying, we are going to sit back and let you all work it out. so, really, this now has become a moment for the house republicans to come together. the conservatives on the right, the moderates in the middle. there is concern across the party here. but, you know, all of them know that their re-elections could potentially depend on it. there is some frustration that the, sort of the whole rush to get this done today for the symbolism of the seventh anniversary of obamacare may have rushed things too much. but the reality is, the president has given his officials, his top advisers an objective to get this done, regardless of when that is, and even frankly, regardless of what
is in the bill. but kate, so important to remember, this is not the end. this is the beginning. if the house passes a bill, which is still an "if" at this point, it must go to the senate. then they must reconcile. and have two more stages of this. so this is just showing you how very difficult this is. but it's not an overstatement to say that the entire agenda of this president is now resting upon how this vote will go. because if it fails, it means so many more difficult days ahead. >> i just heard a collective eye roll from all of our viewers. this is just the beginning? >> i know, i'm sorry. >> it's not jeff. it's not his fault. "outfront" now, republican congressman from alabama, mo brooks, a member of the house freedom caucus. congressman, thank you so much for the time. you're a busy man. you have been a "no" vote on this bill. you just left a meeting with the speaker. and i'm told also, steve bannon and chief of staff reince priebus. what did they tell you? >> well, there are three aspects of this bill that are important.
the focus was on primarily the third one. and i can go into number one and number two if you wish. but the third one deals with the cost of premiums to americans. we're supposed to be doing this in order to make health insurance and health care more affordable. unfortunately, this legislation, this massive republican welfare plan, does not do that, according to the congressional budget office, and the joint committee on tax united nations, health insurance premiums, if this republican health care plan passes, will go up 15 to 20% over the next two years. and so, the intensity of the discussion that we just had was, how are we going to do what needs to be done to lower the cost of premiums, not increase them? because increasing them is the exact opposite direction for a lot of struggling american families, who are trying to make ends meet. >> congressman, you any closer after that meeting to a "yes" tonight? >> no, ma'am, i am not. and if i could have a second,
let me explain why. i mentioned there are three things. one is we have to lower the cost of premiums and this legislation as it currently exists does not do that. but second, this is the largest republican welfare program in the history of the republican party. and we're being asked to vote for it. and ultimately that undermines the work ethic -- >> -- whole thing out. they've got to throw this whole thing out and start over to get you to -- >> this is what i would advocate and i have advocated. we need to pass the same repeal bill that passed the house and the senate just two years ago, that went to barack obama's desk. he vetoed it. donald trump would sign it. it needs to have an effective day some time in the future. now, this is important to break this action into two. repeal and then whatever you're going to have to improve the system. no democrat is going to vote for anything that has any semblance of repeal in it. even if it's only a partial repeal. once you pass the repeal, all of a sudden, all those democrat votes could become active
participants in whatever we're going to do to improve health care in the united states of america, hopefully, at lower cost to american citizens. so now you have a much bigger block of congressmen and senators you can work with, as you try to cobble together the votes that are necessary to get it through the house of representatives, which is relatively easy. and then to do the eye of the needle kind of thing with the united states senate, where they are hamstrung by these archaic, arcane rules that for the life of me i don't understand why they still agree to them. >> well, senator, they do kind of like those rules until they're on the losing end of oit. regardless, where we are right now, you've made no progress or they've made no progress with you, is what i'm hearing. right now, there's no talk of throwing this entire bill out. they want to work around the edges to try to win over some votes. when you head into this meeting then tonight, what are the chances, if you could guess, that y'all are going to come out with a deal? >> that is very difficult for me to evaluate, as i understand, the republican conference, it's going to be more of, this is the status of where we are, rather
than, we need to renegotiate the terms and conditions of this republican welfare bill. those kinds of negotiations will be taking place with the leaders of various groups, within the gop conference. each leader represents a certain interest in the legislation. for example, there will be some that represent the desire to decrease the premium costs so we can fulfill the needs of the american people. >> at the end of the day, if this fails, because you're going to demand changes. if this fails, what's to blame? you're not going to blame yourself. are you going to blame the house speaker or blame president trump? >> i'm not going to blame anybody. if this legislation does not fail, it fails because the position we were put in by obamacare in the first instance. and obamacare -- >> but y'all promised this for cycle after cycle, you guys get this done. you got the numbers, if y'all
could come together. >> well, that's why i suggest that we go ahead and vote to repeal obamacare with the same legislation that we had two years ago, a republican house and a republican senate passed that legislation. it went to president obama and naturally, he covets obamacare and he vetoed our legislation. but let's pass the same legislation, send it to donald trump's desk, and i'm pretty confident that president trump will sign that legislation. and then we can start working on what is necessary to improve our health care system, via separate legislation, where the democrats are now freed up to participate, cooperate, and help us improve what's going on. >> let's see if that's -- i'll be -- let's see if that becomes the plan "b" in the fallback from the speaker. >> i hope it does. >> mo brooks, thank you very much for your time. thanks for the time, before you head into this meeting. "outfront" now, the megapanel, i'm calling it. they're going to be here with me the entire hour, because i can't do this myself. former adviser to four presidents, including reagan and
clinton, nia-malika henderson, davidgerden, mark preston, jack kingston is here, amanda carpenter, and former democratic member of the south carolina house of representatives, bakari sellers. mo brooks is not moving. that's about the state of play for that member of the house freedom caucus. david, but he's deep in the details. pull us back for a second. what is at stake tonight, as they head into this meeting, for republicans and the president? >> well, one sixth of the american economy and the welfare of millions of americans, first and foremost, is at stake. you know, this is why it's so cli complicated. we're dealing with a massive piece of the american economy and trying to reorganize it. that's why so many presidents have failed at this. it is complicated, and hard to rally. but i think that donald trump's presidency to a significant degree rests upon pulling us out tonight. he -- pulling out before it's over to get a vote out of the
house, at least. because, you know, he's supposed to be the -- have the art of the deal, right? that's his play and his strength. he needs to show he can do that. but it's also going to cast a pall over the rest of his legislation. and if that happens, that brings possible problems on the economic front. we've had a huge trump rally. the stock market has gone up 10% since he was elected. and a lot of that was on a bet that he would be able to get his tax cuts through, his infrastructure plan through, and get it through this year. if that all get shoves into next year, that's bad in terms of the economy. >> congressman, in your former life, you were in charge of whipping, whipping members of congress, essentially. that's why it's called the whip. >> there were many wlhips. >> you helped rang l the votes and get everyone in life. how much are you sweating tonight? >> i'm sweating because of two things. you're hearing people like mo brooks say, reopen the entire
bill. >> that's going back to square zero. >> yeah, major surgery. and then on the other hand -- and i've seen that before. and sometimes you can nibble around the edges, make a few things different, but then there's also the question that leadership has, where you just power your way through. you put it on the house floor and see what happens. at one time when i was in the house leadership, we had a five-vote margin. and we honestly had to go to the floor many times, not knowing if the bill would pass or not. but sometimes, it takes that kind of pressure and realization moment for people to come to jesus, if you will. and then they say, okay, do i really, with my very safe district and ten terms behind me want to make some freshman walk the plank, so i can have vote purity with an outside rating group, or do i want to put my own politics behind and make them secondary and let's get this thing done? >> republicans, will they find religion in the face of this health care bill? guys, stand by. we've got a lot more to come to. "outfront" next, house republican meeting behind closed doors at this very moment.
can they hammer o out a deal to save the health care bill? all eyes on empty hallways and packed rooms. plus, a top democrat says he has new information on collusion between associates of donald trump and russia that would merit a grand jury investigation. senator lindsey graham is my guest. and it's been a tough week for the president. is he leaving town? gho jeanne moos has the story. eo ga. this is not a screensaver. this is the destruction of a cancer cell by the body's own immune system, thanks to medicine that didn't exist until now. and today can save your life. ♪ ♪ weeds. nature's boomerang. at roundup®, we know they keep coming back. draw the line. one spray of roundup® max control 365 kills weeds to the root and keeps 'em away for up to one year.
come on everybody. aleve. live whole. not part. that the essence of integrity is a promise kept. ♪ if you've got the time welcome to the high life. ♪ we've got the beer ♪ miller beer breaking news. house republicans behind closed doors right now battling it out over health care. the vote, postponed. the president's major legislative promise hanging in the balance. trump adviser kellyanne conway just seen arriving at the capitol just moments ago in those basement hallways. looks likes she's heading into that big meeting. dana bash is live on the hill outside that big meeting. dana, what are you hearing now from republicans? >> reporter: kate, they are meeting -- that's right, right behind these closed doors. this is a meeting that was supposed to happen hours ago, and it was a vote that was supposed to happen hours ago.
everything delayed, because they don't have the votes. and that is the bottom line. the hard, cold truth of what's going on, that the republican caucus is still fractured. what they are hoping that they can do is to figure out a way to find enough consensus to at least move forward procedurally tonight and at least begin debate tomorrow morning. i'm told that there is a lot of pressure coming from the white house, from officials there, who hope that at least by scheduling votes, that that will kind of get the ball moving. and a little bit of tension with some house republican leaders who have done this before, who have experience in pushing too hard before the votes are there, only having to pull the bill. and with something like this, the president and the republican's top legislative priority, the promise that they made in election after election since obamacare was passed into law, it is not something that republican leaders here want to mess with in terms of having
that kind of defeat. so, where are we right now? the republican house freedom caucus, that conservative group that has been sort of in a block, saying that they want this bill to move in a more conservative way, to move up some of the repeals, of, for example, the benefits that are essential, that are part of obamacare, they went to the white house today, as you know, and then they just met with steve bannon. the president's chief counselor and the president's chief of staff, reince priebus, as well as the onb director, mick mulvaney. they're trying to get them to "yes "yes." do you feel confident there are the votes to pass this now? >> i think we need a couple more to get together. the president had made great progress with individuals. we just need to make sure everybody is there and we'd be able to solve this problem.
>> reporter: they don't have it get, that's the baottom line, kate. the scramble is on and they don't know what's going to happen coming out of this meeting. it is so crucial, the outcome of the discussion going on behind closed doors to determine whether or not they're even going to start the debate, as their plan is tonight. and again, as the white house is really pushing thousands republican leaders to do, kate. >> what breaks up this logjam is unclear at this moment. dana, thank you so much. dana's there and we'll get back to her as things are changing on the hill, fast. the panel is with me. mark, as dana's talking about. kellyanne conway is on the hill, steve bannon is on the hill. we're huddling with speaker ryan and they're heading into this meeting. what does that tell you? it tells you that they are scrambling to try to get something done and try to get to 216 votes. you know, i think the biggest problem right now for president trump is that he has to legislate, right? and he's been able to get things done by fiat. he's been able to use executive order, which every president
does during their first couple months in office. but he always talks about being a good dealmaker and negotiator. he's at the point that he has to negotiate with over 200 republicans right now. he's not talking directly to davidg gergen saying, i want to buy this property. he has to -- let's put it this way. he is out of his league when it comes to figuring out how to deal with capitol hill. >> then what, nia? where are things right now? i mean, the chances that they come out of this room with a deal, if you listen to mo brooks, is zero. >> they're talking about flipping 30 to 40 votes from no to yes. that sounds really, really easy. so it's unclear. one of the things i think that's happened over the last 24 to 48 hours is that you had big money people come out, the koch brothers, essentially come out and say, listen. house gop, the freedom caucus, if you want to stand on purity and vote against this thing, then they have your back. the koch brothers have their back. and also, the chattering classes of conservatives.
people like laura ingraham and people like ann coulter. and interest groups like heritage action and the club for growth. they're all against this. so, with trump, you never saw him on the front end try to negotiate, try to build a consensus, try to build an eco chamber around this thing. they thought he could come in and muscle this thing and really by the force of his personality and the crowds that we saw, of course, in kentucky, they thought that would work, it hasn't work. >> there are a million sticking points on this right now, depending on who you talk to. but with the house freedom caucus, one of the big sticking points, first off, leadership aides say they moved the goalposts. but one of the things now is, they call them title 1 regulations. got to love the term, but it gets to some of the most important stuff, some of the most liked stuff in obamacare, like pre-existing conditions. now, if they're putting that on the table, everyone needs to remember exactly what the president has said about this amanda, and i want to get your take. >> when you replace it, are you going to make sure that people
with preconditions are still covered? >> yes, because it happens to be one of the strongest assets. >> you're going to keep that? >> a lot with the children living with their parents for an extended period. we're going to very much try to keep that. adds cost, but it's very much something we'll try to keep. >> and that's not the only time he said it. could that honestly be on the table right now? >> here's the thing we're seeing play out right now and was revealed in the interview you conducted with congressm maman brooks earlier. there's still debate rages between republicans and conservatives between straight repeal and repeal and replace. repeal and replace was kind of a message thought out by leadership because they didn't want to do too strongly against obamacare. trump kind of bought into that. then he won. nobody thought he was going to win. and he got with paul ryan and came up with this plan. i think paul ryan nougthought, , we can do repeal and replace and i will get donald trump to bring over the conservatives. that part never happened. donald trump never brought the
conservatives over. paul ryan never dealt them in. they're still on the outside saying, we want repeal. that's the sticking point. full repeal, not repeal and replace. >> so what are democrats doing at this moment? are they just at happy hour? >> it's too large of an issue. and it is a part of the legacy of barack obama, but even more importantly, what nobody's mentioned is that paul ryan and the republican leadership had seven years to dream this up, and they came out with a really bad piece of legislation. so you're starting with something that's really poorly written. 17% in the latest quinnipiac poll approve of this piece of legislation. it's more unpopular now than obamacare ever was. and so when you look at this bad piece of legislation, the freedom caucus talking about taking away essential benefits. you talk about maternity care, rehabilitative care, emergency services. all the things that make obamacare well liked, the bill is going from bad to worse. and lastly, from the democratic perspective. one of the things that you --
whether or not -- whether or not you like nancy pelosi or you do not, you saw how strong a leader nancy pelosi was. her pure leadership skills. paul ryan does not have that. paul ryan has a caucus that's running all over the place. and not only that, but you didn't see one democrat -- you don't have one democrat that's in the "yes" column for this piece of legislation. >> and i'm supposed to be shocked, how? >> in the past, you've had moderate democrats in swing districts that would come out and support a president or gop leadership. you don't see that, that's strong leadership by nancy pelosi. >> or you're being a little altruistic thinking any democrat would come over on a repeal and replace of obamacare. >> democrats got replaced by republicans that are swinging in the wind. >> congressman kingston will take us in the room and tell us exactly what the arm-twisting feels like. up next, new evidence pointing to trump associates coordinating with russians. and president trump defending his wild, baseless
claims, saying, quote, i'm president and you're not. well, that is -- well, that's true, i guess. ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. all while reducing america's emissions. with e*trade's powerful trading tools, right at your fingertips, you have access to in-depth analysis, level 2 data, and a team of experienced traders ready to help you if you need it. ♪ ♪ it's like having the power of a trading floor, wherever you are. it's your trade. ♪ ♪ e*trade. ♪ ♪ start trading today at etrade.com
more breaking news. the top democrat on the house intelligence committee says he has new evidence that may show collusion between associates of donald trump and russia. congressman adam schiff says it's the type of information that would merit a grand jury investigation. this as u.s. officials tell cnn the fbi also has information that may indicate associates of trump communicated with suspected russian operatives to coordinate the release of an information damaging to hillary clinton's campaign. jeff zeleny is "outfront" at the white house. >> reporter: the top democrat on the house intelligence committee says he has seen new evidence on possible collusion between associates of president trump and russian operatives. >> we continue to get new information that i think paints a more complete picture of at least what we know at the outset of our investigation. >> reporter: congressman adam schiff tells cnn's manu raju the new details, which he would not disclose, could merit a grand jury investigation. >> it's the kind of evidence that you would submit to a grand jury at the beginning of an investigation. and given the gravity of the
subject matter, i think that the evidence certainly warrants us doing a thorough investigation. >> reporter: tonight, this new development, as the republican chairman of the house intelligence committee telling colleagues, he's sorry, not for going to the white house to brief the president on surveillance, but for failing to tell democrats first. >> the bottom line is, is that i try to treat everybody fairly and republicans and democrats. but this is not an easy minefield. >> reporter: congressman devon nunes issued an apology behind closed doors today, helping to quell the uproar sparked by he has revelation wednesday that communications among members of the trump administration may have been unwittingly swept up by u.s. surveillance. he declined to say where he learned the new information or whether the white house helped orchestrate the bombshell. >> we have to keep our sources and methods here very, very quiet. the president didn't invite me over. i called him. i called down there and invited myself. because i thought he needed to understand what i saw and that he needed try to get that
information, because he has every right to see it. >> reporter: that answer didn't sit well with democrats. >> i think he has demonstrated very clearly that there is no way there can be an impartial investigation under his leadership on that committee. >> good afternoon, everybody. >> at the white house today, press secretary sean spicer tried to brush off questions about how nunes ended up at the white house on wednesday. >> i think that there should be a similar concern as to as opposed to whether he took a skateboard or a car here to exactly what happened and why it happened. >> reporter: yet the substance of the information shared with the president still largely remains a mystery, even though he says he feels partially vindicated. >> i somewhat do, i must tell you, i somewhat do. i very much appreciated the fact that they found what they found. >> reporter: now, to give you a sense of how difficult this investigation might be going forward, they cannot even agree on what the new evidence is. the republican chairman of this committee said that, look, i have not seen any new evidence at all.
he said he had no idea what adam schiff, the democrat, was talking about. and he says this new evidence points a whole new picture of this investigation. so this is one censor that this bipartisan investigation has been complicated with politics, of course. but kate, important to remember, the senate investigating on its own. the fbi also has its own investigation as well on the white house connections to any possible russia links. >> absolutely. jeff, thank you. "outfront" tonight, republican senator, lindsey graham. senator, thanks so much for the time. >> thank you. >> so you have seen cnn's new reporting, senator, that u.s. officials are saying that the fbi is looking into trump associates and that they may have colluded with suspected russian operatives to release information damaging to hillary clinton during the campaign. you, of course, have oversight over the fbi and your subcommittee. have you seen anything that points to this? >> no, i haven't. i've heard from director clapper that during his time, he saw no collusion between the trump campaign and the russians. now we know that director comey
says there's an ongoing criminal investigation, we have your report. and the one thing i would tell the country is i want to make sure we get to the bottom of whatever this is, that go where the evidence takes you, that i hope the house and senate can hold it together, and congress can do their job, but the main thing is, let the fbi do their job without political interference. >> senator, you said you hope the house and the senate can hold it together. that gets to this. the house intelligence community chairman, devon nunes, he apologized today to democrats on his committee for not briefing them before going to the press and the president about what he is seeing in this centennial, possible incidental collection of trump. is that apology enough? >> i don't know. it would be up to the democratic members of the house. the hearing they held was pretty impressive, i thought. good questions. i want to get to the leakers, too, but also, i'm glad now i know. it was senator white house and myself who asked a question to the fbi director about a ongoing criminal investigation, was
there a warrant issued, was there a wiretapping of the trump campaign? that hearing produced answers to both answers. there is an ongoing criminal investigation. the fbi director, the nsa director saw no evidence of wiretapping, so the house committee did their job well there, but when nunes went to the white house, he really fractured this relationship. and i think schiff as, at times, tried to guest there's circumstantial evidence about collaboration that i thought was inappropriate. i hope they can come back together and hold it together. the senate's doing really withber and warner. >> on health care, on the news -- news on this is changing minute by minute. >> that's right. >> tell me if you know where we are right now. >> no, i have no clue. >> when do you honestly think you're going to have a bill in front of you in the senate? >> here's what i honestly think. the process in place to produce a bill gives a turkish bazaar a bad name. what does it sound like? people are being threatened to vote yes.
they're being bribed to vote yes. it sounds a lot like obamacare to me. i have very little confidence that the process that i see playing out in the house is going to produce a very good result. and i promise you this, that if the bill comes to the senate, we're not going to do it the way the house did. we're actually going to be amend the bill and actually be able to read the bill and take a thoughtful approach to trying to repeal and replace obamacare. >> what does this say about the house speaker? you have little confidence they're going to send you a bill you can look at? >> i think it's sort of gotten out of hand. i really do. i like paul ryan a lot. he's got brilliant ideas about health care. >> who do you think is running the show? do you think it's ryan or trump? >> i think they're trying to -- the people running the show are the ones holding out their votes. >> i want to turn sfourt. the confirmation hearings during the judiciary hearings held this week. top democrat in the senate now, chuck schumer, says he's going to filibuster, democrats are, neil gorsuch. you said today that you would do whatever it takes to get him on the court. does that include the nuclear
option? the washington speak, senator, for changing the rules to make it easier to force through a nominee? >> so here's what i believe. if you filibuster judge gorsuch, you're telling president trump and every other republican, we don't care that you won. he's the most qualified person president trump could have chosen, beyond reproach, in terms of his qualifications. it would be basically setting aside the skplelection. >> will you sign on to the nuclear option for supreme court nominees? >> i'm telling my democratic colleagues, if you do not allow up or down vote on this guy after what i've done in the past, then you don't care about t the traditions of the senate and you don't care about president trump being treated fairly. i didn't vote for him. i didn't vote for obama. i haven't voted for a president who won in 12 years. but the one thing i will not do is allow president trump to be denied what every other president's had the ability to do, is to nominate qualified people. so, yes, i'm not going to play
the game two different ways. i hope i never have to get there. but i want you to know that i am not going to play the game where they get everything they want and we never get anything. >> that's a threat. i'll take that as a yes. senator, thank you so much for your time, as always. >> that's a promise. thank you. outfr"outfront" next, the breaking news, what's happening right now, seriously, behind closed doors right now on capitol hill. we have new details on the health care vote that was or wasn't. donald trump goes on the record defending many indefensible claims. could he, would he ever admit he's wrong? and the president behind the wheel. just where is he going and is he qualified to drive? jeanne moos looks for answer ss. box 365, the calendar. everyone knows my paperless, safe driver, and multi-car discounts, but they're about to see a whole new side of me. heck, i can get you over $600 in savings. chop, chop. do i look like i've been hurt before? because i've been hurt before.
um, actually your session is up. hang on. i call this next one "junior year abroad." [ om[ sniffs ]c ] youlittle girl: daddy! trapped by your unrelenting nasal allergies? [ meow ] [ sneezes ] try clarispray clarispray provides unsurpassed relief. it's 24 hour, non-drowsy and prescription strength. free yourself with clarispray, from the makers of claritin.
i wanti did my ancestrydna and where i came from. and i couldn't wait to get my pie chart. the most shocking result was that i'm 26% native american. i had no idea. just to know this is what i'm made of, this is where my ancestors came from. and i absolutely want to know more about my native american heritage.
breaking news at this very moment. house speaker paul ryan is meeting with the entire republican caucus. fro the promised vote, canceled. the answer to obamacare, completely up in the air. the president's agenda, on hold. and moments ago, reince priebus and steve bannon seen leaving that meeting. the chief of staff, reince priebus, is saying tonight, they're still feeling positive. a lot of work to do, understatement of the year. phil mattingly is "outfront" on capitol hill right now with all
of this. phil, what are your sources telling you about what actually went on in that meeting? >> the messenger is very clear, kate. the president wants a vote, he wants a vote tomorrow, and there will be no more negotiating. that's what mick mulvaney told the republican conference, according to a source in the room and made very clear, it was a message backed up by speaker paul ryan and majority leader, kevin mcarty, as well. they've very clear, despite what's been going on, despite the various options put on the table, the negotiating is over, the deal is exactly what was more or less proposed last night, stripping the health care benefits, the manager's amendment, and there will be no more. now, i'm told by a source in the room that was met with cheers, but the big question, obviously, remains, where does that leave the freedom caucus and those moderates who were very uncomfortable that this proposal was put out in the first place? that said, it was made very clear, kate, that the president himself was not just asking for a vote tomorrow, he's more or less demanding a vote tomorrow. the pressure is now on. they're making clear, this is over. it's time to move forward on
health care, kate? >> we are done negotiating. phil, great stuff. thank you so very, very much. panel's back with me. funny thing about that demand. the president doesn't run congress, mark preston. >> no. and i think it's really interesting that there's an edict that has been dropped and he doesn't run the house of representatives, he doesn't run the united states senate. there are three branchs of government. and i think it's very telling right now where the white house feels that they are. and that is backed into a corner without the votes to get anything done. >> and if they're backed into the corner, what is this now? a game of chicken? i dare you to go to the house floor and not vote for this thing? >> do you want to be the person to stand in the way of this dream that republicans have had to repeal and replace obamacare? and listen, is the house freedom caucus, are they going to hang together, are they going to be able to peel people off? we'll see. nobody knows. this is like being able to poll the winner of a game in the first quarter. >> call it, david. seriously. >> if they really called off negotiations, no more
negotiations, i don't see how they pull this out. i could see it if they were down to single digits. they only needed five or six. i think they could pull that out. but if you're really talking 30 to 40, as congressman brooks was earlier, i've never seen a white house pull out 30 or 40 votes at the last minute. and on a bill that is not popular with the public. that's very important. as bakari pointed out, it's 17% for in a quinnipiac poll. when president obama got his obamacare through, it was in the low 40s approval, it wasn't great, but a heck of a lot better than 17%. >> there is a lesson to draw from obamacare, which makes my angry, there's no more negotiations, i've said in the past that we'll let it die and i'll move on. excuse me, republicans have campaigned on repealing brk for seven years. barack obama did not give up on his health care bill three months into his presidency. is president trump really going to give up on health care three months into your presidency? no. they will not admit right now there's plan "b," there plan be
plan b, c, d, all the way to z. >> do you think they let this go to the floor and fail? >> no. i think they let it go to the floor. "art of the deal," president 78, this is a tactic. he's put in steve scalise's lap, patrick mchenry is the assistant whip. they'll be working all night long to make sure they have the votes. >> so if this fails, it's the whips' fault. >> at a certain point, it becomes the house affair. steve bannon has star power, kellyanne conway, but they're not members of the house. and that's why it's so important. get them out of the room and let steve scalise get to work. >> bakari sellers can't wait to get in. >> i have to point this out, because the republicans and donald trump had this misconception of where the blame false. if this does not -- >> on you, apparently. >> apparent they're going to blame me. but i know they're going to say, because mo brooks said it, this is barack obama's fault. no, the american people are smarter than this. when this bill does not pass, this is paul ryan and donald trump's baby. you had seven years. today is the seven-year anniversary of people actually
getting quality health care in this country. and there's no democrat that will tell you that we don't need to fix obamacare, we do. we need to make sure we're infusing money in the state pool to insurance companies stay. something the republican party can work on doing. but obamacare has saved lives. and they're having a hard time dealing with that. and i'm just relishing in the fact that paul ryan could not give his smug speech today on the seven-year anniversary. >> so when it comes down to it, do you think the threat, if this is a part of "the art of deal," page 100-whatever. do you think the threat that they have leveled, you could lose your seat, we could lose the whole majority, do you think that's anything here? >> i think it's very dangerous for him to be playing chicken with congress. ed to david's point, he has a very big agenda in front of him. to be making enemies right now with members of congress who ideologically don't agree with it, personally may not agree with it, perhaps their constituents don't agree with it, to say negotiations are off is not going to get you there. let me bring up one quick name that most of us will remember, i think we'll all remember, paul ryan could really use tom delay
right now. somebody who knew how to twist some arms and whip some votes. >> he would have to get permission from his probation officer. >> okay! i now have to drop the hammer. bakari gets the hook. "outfront" next, just released e-mails on donald trump's claims about his inauguration crowd and the lengths people went to make him happy. we'll be right back. you know who likes to be in control? this guy. check it out! self-appendectomy! oh, that's really attached. that's why i rent from national. where i get the control to choose any car in the aisle i want, not some car they choose for me. which makes me one smooth operator. ah! still a little tender.
(vo) go national. go like a pro. there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation if my plans change. visit booking.com. booking.yeah. but fair. this beer is tough... coors banquet. that's how it's done. knows how it feels to seees your numbers go up, despite your best efforts. but what if you could turn things around? what if you could love your numbers?
discover once-daily invokana®. it's the #1 prescribed sglt2 inhibitor that works to lower a1c. invokana® is a pill used along with diet and exercise to significantly lower blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. and in most clinical trials, the majority reached an a1c goal of 7 percent or lower. invokana® works around the clock by sending some sugar out of your body through the process of urination. it's not for lowering systolic blood pressure or weight, but it may help with both. invokana® can cause important side effects, including dehydration, which may cause you to feel dizzy, faint,lightheaded,or weak, upon standing. other side effects may include kidney problems, genital yeast infections,changes in urination, high potassium, increases in cholesterol, risk of bone fracture, or urinary tract infections, possibly serious. serious side effects may include ketoacidosis, which can be life threatening. stop taking and call your doctor right away if you experience symptoms
or if you experience symptoms of allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, or difficulty breathing or swallowing. do not take invokana® if you have severe liver or kidney problems or are on dialysis. tell your doctor about any medical conditions and medications you take. using invokana® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. it's time to turn things around. lower your blood sugar with invokana®. imagine loving your numbers. there's only one invokana®. ask your doctor about it by name. the markets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor...
t. rowe price. invest with confidence. tonight, stunning new evidence the trump administration was working with the national parks service to push the now-debudgnked claim tt he had the largest inauguration crowd ever. according to e-mails that were just released, sean spicer requested aerial photos of the crowd. they were cropped to focus on just the first few blocks of the mall, where of course the crowd was largest. this is coming as the president is speaking up to "time" magazine and defending a number of other debunked claims from wiretapping to widespread voter fraud. tom foreman is "outfront". >> time and again, the president's statements seem to collide with the truth on his allegation that he was wiretapped by president obama, after the chairman of the house intelligence committee said communications of trump and his associates may have been collected by intelligence agencies, trump told "time," so that means i'm right. but, hold on!
>> just to be clear, there's still no evidence that president trump himself was wiretapped? >> that is correct. that is correct. >> reporter: the chairman said the intelligence agencies were surveilling foreign targets. on tweeting, specifically on the four tweets that started the wiretapping uproar, the president echoed his own press secretary. when i said "wiretapping," it was in quotes. what i'm talking about is surveillance. >> the president was very clear in his tweet that it was, you know, wiretapping. >> reporter: but even if you buy that, only some tweets have the quote marks. others, including the most damning one, did not. on the unemployment rate -- >> it is such a phony number. these numbers are an absolute disaster. >> reporter: just as he did in the race, trump insisted government figures on jobs, they are not real statistics. never mind that trump's own team praised them earlier this month following a positive jobs report. >> i talked to the president prior to this and he said to quote him very clearly, they may have been phony in the past, but
it's very real now. >> reporter: on the election, he did not back down from his unproven claim he lost the popular vote to hillary clinton because of millions of people who voted illegally. he merely repeated an early defense. i mean, mostly, they registered wrong. in other words, for the votes, they register incorrectly and/or illegally and they then vote. still, there's no evidence whatsoever that millions voted illegally. >> reporter: and on dirty tricks, during the campaign, trump cited a story suggesting ted cruz's father kept company with president kennedy's assassin. >> his father was with lee harvey oswald prior to oswald's being, you know, shot. >> reporter: cruz howled, say g ing that was not his dad. >> this man is a pathological liar. >> reporter: the story came from "the national enquirer," which never provided any proof. and though trump cited it as true at the time, now he says,
well, that was in a newspaper. throw this campaign, that's common for a president. wherever cornered, he says, i read it somewhere, heard it somewhere, somebody told him, and that is true, even if the fact itself is not. kate? >> great to see you, tom. thank you. the panel is back. they've got something to say about this. amanda, that was a doozy of an interview with "time" magazine. what's your takeaway? >> i'm trying to figure out how it came about. they want to do an interview with you about how you don't tell the truth? who says yes to that? donald trump. because he doesn't care, his staff doesn't care. they make jokes about it. they think it's a big joke. but it has real ramifications when you tell a lie that leads to fbi investigations that makes the government consume precious resources that should be dedicated to keeping the homeland safe. that's where it's no longer a joke and he needs to take it seriously. >> one of the things tom foreman
brought up and i've been harping on this as well. you hear the president when he's confronted with something that has been proven false. a claim that's been debunked. his reaction is, i didn't say it, i'm just quoting it. it happens now and it's happened before. a walk down memory lane. >> i didn't make an opinion on it. that was a statement made by a very talented lawyer on fox. there's this doubt. people have doubt. again, this was not my suggestion. i didn't bring this up. >> why did you put it in your tweet if you don't believe it? >> they said it, i didn't say it. >> i don't know. i was given that information. i was given -- actually, i've seen that information around. >> that's like me saying, congressman, i am not asking you a question, i'm just looking directly you, and i'm going to string some words together and put a big question mark on the end of it. is this now the epitome of distinction without a difference? >> i think this is the donald, this is the style. and i think as he matures in
office, he'll do what all presidents do and he will probably find himself a little bit more guarded in the things he says. i want to say this. and i say this not sarcastically, but to run for the president of the united states, 320 million people in america, with you have to a very, very large ego. and one characteristic of people with big egos is they rarely see themselves as being wrong. i wases in the oval office with george bush and he had just had a doozy. it involved a supreme court nominee, david will remember well, harriet miers, and in a small meeting he said, you know, i rarely make mistakes, but this time, i got ahead of the american people. he didn't say, it was a bad choice, he said, i got ahead of the american people and didn't explain it to them. and all i'm saying is that there's a different kind of view sometimes when you have that much of, you know, a view maybe of yourself. and i'm just saying, that's -- >> they all do it! >> they all do it, the congressman says. but, here's one point that we can't forget to point out.
this isn't a bit of a surprise to a lot of people. the country voted him in, knowing he did not tell the truth all the time. let's go right back to the conspiracy with ted cruz's father. they knew this. >> they don't all do it. and that's dangerous when we start talking about presidents lie, because they don't all lie -- >> president obama did. >> they don't all mischaracterize the truth. the problem is this white house and this president have eroded the credibility gap faster than any president in recent history. the problem is with that, when something happens and we need the president to look the american people in the face and tell the truth, who will believe him? i, for one, do not trust the president of the united states tor white house. i think there are millions of americans, tens of millions of americans, democrats, republicans, and independents who feel that way, with as well, and that's danger. >> give me one final thought, nia. can they keep this up? >> i think they will, because this is donald trump. he just seems so tragically insecure and small in this interview. it's almost sad to read, to see how gullible he is.
that he will essentially make things up to protect his own ego. i mean, that to me, it was a devastating kind of account and walk through his mind. >> guys, great to have you. thanks so much. we're keeping our eye on capitol hill. breaking news happening left and right. thank you so much for joining us tonight. "a.c. 360" starts right now. and good evening from washington. thanks for joining us tonight on the seventh anniversary of president obama's affordable care act, the bill president trump supports to replace it is in serious trouble. and we've just learned that a white house ultimatum has been issued. it came at the meeting behind the doors you see there and a deadline set inside that room is where house republicans have been trying to reconcile two opposing factions within their party. one, the freedom caucus, the one that wants less comprehensive coverage in the bill. and other republican moderates asking for more. will they emerge from these doors with a deal ready to vote on, or tomorrow end like today with no vote and no agreement. most of the lawmakers i