tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN April 5, 2017 10:00pm-11:01pm PDT
truth." before we leave tonight, i have final thought. today a reporter asked president trump about fox news star bill o'reilly and the sexual harassment allegations against him. and the president of the united states responded, "i don't think bill did anything wrong." now, look, we could just brush this off as another example of trump spewing out garbage about stuff he doesn't understand but actually trump understands treating women like crap very well because at least 11 different women have accused president trump of sexual harassment, themselves. also, trump seems to know a lot about being a hypocrite because when another bill, bill clinton, was accused of similar stuff, trump went on the warpath then saying that the women were right and that that bill was wrong. but that's not the worst of it. here's the messy truth that nobody's talking about. liberal feminists, honestly, they were never in trump's camp,
anyway, so maybe he doesn't owe them very much, but donald trump owes conservative women everything. they came out for him in droves. they stopped hillary clinton and they put him in power. and those are the kinds of women, it's pretty safe to assume, work at fox news. now look at trump throwing conservative women under the bus. his own core supporters. without even giving them two seconds of a fair hearing. zero loyalty to the women who got him into the white house. that's got to be devastating for trump supporters. and now where is warrior for women ivanka trump? where is she? she said she wants to use her platform for good. well, good, your dad just spat in the face of the very women who gave you and your family that platform. i am sure that your fellow conservative women would like to
hear from you now and so would the rest of us. so would the rest of us. so i want to thank my studio audience and all you watching at home. had an honest conversation. had the governator. keep the conversation going at home and your dinner tables and your neighborhoods. we are messy. we tell it like we see it. "cnn tonight with don lemon" starts right now. i love you, don. thank you very much, van jones. president trump for the first time since taking office facing a number of major crisys around the yurld, so what he's prepared to do about all this? this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. what is the president's foreign policy? he said a chemical attack
against civilians in syria crossed many lines for him but he's refusing to reveal how he'll respond. >> i'm not saying i'm doing anything one way or the other but i'm certainly not going to be telling you. >> meanwhile, president trump demotes top aide stephen bannon removing him from a prominent seat on the national security council. tonight "the new york times" says bannon threatened to quit over this move. we're going to have the very latest on that. and if all that wasn't enough, another explosive allegation the president suggesting that former national security adviser susan rice may have committed a crime in requesting names of intelligence communications be unmasked. but he's offering, again, no evidence of any of that. we're going to get to all of that in-depth in a moment. first, to note, though, before we get started, with a chemical attack in syria, a ballistic missile test in north korea, and an important face-to-face meeting with china's leader looming, the president of the united states thought it was important to defend an embattled cable news host. talking about bill o'reilly who has been accused and settled multiple sexual harassment cases for millions upon millions of
dollars. but let's think about this, if you were bill o'reilly, would you really want help from the man who said this? >> i got to use some tic tacs in case i start kissing her. i'm automatically attracted to beautiful -- i just start kissing them. like a magnet. just kiss. i don't even wait. when you're a star, they let you do it. you can do anything. >> whatever you want. >> grab them by the pussy. can do anything. >> not too sure that helps either one of them. i'm going to talk to one of the president's closest friends and we're going to hear from women who worked at fox news. we'll get to all that in a moment, first, it's been a mementos event all over the world, inside the white house. i want to bring in fareed zakaria. it's an interesting term, but this is a world we live in. fareed, i'm going to start with
you because we're talking about the president's chief. this is a tremendous day in foreign policy news. the president's chief strategist, steve bannon, no longer going to have a prominent seat on the national security council. here's what "the new york times" is reporting tonight. "mr. bannon resisted the move even threatening at one point to quit if it went forward, that's according to a white house official who like others insisted on anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. mr. bannon's camp denied he had threatened to resign and spend the day spreading the word that the shift was a natural evolution not a signal of any diminution of his outsize." >> what's your reaction to the reporting? >> what it does seem to suggest, and let's hope this is an early sign of a shift, which is the emergence of professionalism or the return of professionalism in american foreign policy. you know, there's always been this paradox which is trump's own foreign policy views have
been pretty amateurish, emotional, contradictory, during the campaign he said all kinds of strange things about various countries, nato was obsolete, the chinese were raping us, he was going to bomb the shit out of isis. all these kinds of things. then he appointed a very solid team of foreign policy people. mcmaster, national security council, eventually tillerson at state, mattis at defense, kelly at homeland security. perhaps what is beginning to happen is these guys are finding a way to take control of foreign policy and provide some structure. you know, you still have the bizarre situation where the president is now having a summit meeting with the chinese head of state. there still isn't a deputy secretary of state, still isn't a deputy secretary of defense. there still isn't that deputies committee that actually runs american foreign policy, people who produce all the paperwork
for a summit like this. they would produce the accord that would be signed off. so perhaps we're getting some of that because until recently, whether you agreed with it or disagreed with it, the hallmark of trump's foreign policy was incoherence and amateurishness. there was no there, there. there was just a big question mark. >> i'm glad you mentioned mcmaster and i want to ask john about this because, john, there's so many -- there's so many top people, top-level people with the president, jared kushner, steve bannon, reince priebus, kellyanne conway, now this change, it looks like national security adviser h.r. mcmaster does at least have some influence. do you see this as a proxy war for the president's ear, possibly? >> i think it's a constant war. i think it's a hobsian struggle in the white house for the president's ears. one of the ironies and remarkable realities of our time is anyone talking on cable television is also in that battle for his ear. and so it's a remarkable hour. i think fareed's right, it's a wonderful sign if in fact there
is a kind of process being imposed. the national security council has been around since 1947 officially. it won the cold war. not a bad recommendation for a given situation. for a given institution. and so there's a reason for process, there's a reason that foreign policy is conducted the way it is. now, the nature of a populist appeal, which is what trump obviously is selling, is that if this process were so great, if traditional foreign policy elites had it so right, why is the world in such a mess? that's going to be his emotional reaction to any kind of criticism or even this kind of commentary. >> but can a white house function like this, john? >> no. not really. i mean, it never has. i mean, this makes, you know, ronald reagan's white house, for instance, had different factions. you had james baker who was the chief of staff who many on the right, the movement conservatives, thought was a
stalking horse for george h.w. bush moderate world. right wing republicans leaking against the moderates says let reagan be reagan. the trump white house makes that world look like valhalla and a wonderfully coherent tribe of people. so, you know, the other thing is you have as you pointed out a remarkable series of events over the last 72 hours or so and there's really no sense of what the american response is either to north korea or to syria. or what is our strategy with going into this meeting with china? so you have three question marks on three incredibly important post-cold war global stories. >> yeah. so much happened at the white house today including, you know, the interview that this came out, the bannon thing, also in that same interview, the president saying that former obama national security adviser
susan rice committed a crime. he didn't specify what crime, he offered no proof. what's your reaction to that? >> well, i think we're all concerned that he makes these wild accusations trying to divert attention from what the real issues are without any proof and, you know, in some ways insulting someone who had strong credibility as a national security adviser and in the previous administration. this is, you know, not becoming of a president, but i think what we saw today was really something even more startling, that was a total flip-flop on one of the biggest issues of our times and that is the syrian civil war. it is the greatest humanitarian crisis since world war ii. it is the bloodiest conflict in the world right now and just yesterday, the white house press secretary said that this was -- it would be silly to consider ousting president assad given the realities, the political realities on the ground. and his u.n. ambassador said just a few days ago that assad
was a hindrance but that the administration was not focused on trying to replace him. and the president has done a total flip-flop in the last 24 hours saying that he's changed his views on assad and syria and now he finds that he faces the very same complex and messy challenges in coming up with a solution to the syrian quagmire that his predecessor did, and he finds that, you know, this is going to be -- that he doesn't have the answers. he doesn't have the staff to deal with it and he doesn't have the specific answers. and he tries to play a game by saying, well, i'm not going to tell you what i am going to do, but that's what he's been saying for a year and a half and the fact is he looks like the emperor without any clothes on. >> fareed, i want to ask you, can i ask you more about susan rice? >> sure. >> also part -- this was a statement from bannon. bannon said "susan rice on operationalized the nsc. i was put on the nsc with general flynn to ensure it was deoperationalized.
general mcmaster return said to the nsc to the proper function. mr. bannon did not explain what he meant by operationalized. she is a target when it comes to that administration, especially the breitbart crowd. the president today saying she committed a crime with no evidence, offering no proof. what's going on here? >> well, it's, you know, it's slander because it's a smear against her. there's no evidence for it whatsoever as you point out. the fact that we're even talks about it is in a sense conceding the, you know, the ground and debating something that is really as far as one can tell made up out of hole cloth. what she did is routine stuff every national security adviser does to the claim she operationalized the national security council to explain what that means to people, it means that the president, president obama took control of foreign policy from the white house rather than letting the state department do diplomacy and the defense department do military
policy. everybody always complains about that. that has been a complaint that goes back to the days of henry kissinger and richard nixon. there's no evidence that susan rice did it much more than anybody else did it and in any event, it's not a crime to do it, so it's a strange set of attacks to make on -- one can only assume as robin says that its main effect is simply diversionary. >> yeah. >> to get us talking about this when we should be talking about what i think really is this extraordinary triple crises that the trump administration faces and on not one of them do we understand what their actual strategy is. not on north korea, not on syria, not on china. >> robin, i heard you and john wanting to react. we will do that right after this break. don't go anywhere. weeds. nature's boomerang. at roundup®, we know they keep coming back. you never invited this stubborn little rascal to your patio. so, draw the line. one spray of roundup® max control 365 kills to the root
and keeps weeds away for up to 12 months. because patios should be for cooking out and kicking back. roundup® max control 365. draw the line. prevent weeds from coming back for up to one year. be the you who doesn't cover your moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. be the you who shows up in that dress. who hugs a friend. who is done with treatments that don't give you clearer skin. be the you who controls your psoriasis with stelara® just 4 doses a year after 2 starter doses. stelara® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before starting stelara® tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. always tell your doctor if you have any signs of infection, have had cancer, if you develop any new skin growths or if anyone in your house needs or has recently received a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems
these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to stelara® or any of its ingredients. most people using stelara® saw 75% clearer skin and the majority were rated as cleared or minimal at 12 weeks. be the you who talks to your dermatologist about stelara®. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ lease a 2017 lincoln mkx for $349 a month. only at your lincoln dealer. is america's number-one you kmotorcycle insurer. yeah, she does purr! best bike i ever owned! no, you're never alone, because our claims reps are available 24/7.
we even cover accessories and custom parts. we diget an early start! took the kids to soccer practice. you want me to jump that cactus? all right. aah! that lady's awesome. i don't see a possum! the president facing a number of major crises around the world. back now with my panel. we were talking about susan rice and claims of unmasking and all of that. robin, i think you wanted to weigh in on that. >> no, actually i resent the fact susan rice is being brought up when we have so many other crises. the president is at a point that he really needs to deal with the outside world. he goes into a meeting tomorrow with xi jinping. this is critical in dealing with the north korea crisis. he needs -- rex tillerson's about to go out to russia and this is critical in dealing with
the syrian crisis. and we're talking about susan rice. i mean, excuse me, let's focus on the things that really count. >> okay. >> and a foreign policy that, frankly, doesn't exist. we have -- we're at a mementos time. the president was right on one thing and that is that the world is a tremendous mess at the moment. >> we're going to move on and talk about what exactly is our foreign policy. john, i want to get you in before we do. what do you say to this? >> just at the moment, we're living in a world where the trump presidency is as if joe mccarthy had a reality show. what mccarthy did in the early 1950s, remember, we're only one person removed from trump to mccarthy, and that's roy cohn. they shared an attorney. the cohn/mccarthy strategy during the red baiting in the early '50s was simply announce something. doesn't have to be true. just announce it so it's covered and talked about. and that's the nature of propaganda and that's what we're living in and the other thing that the president is -- one of his tells is when he says
there's more on this coming, you always know he's making it up. when he says there's more on this coming. and i think that's as though he wants you to tune in next week for the next episode. i think these two cultural tributaries have come together. >> like the tease to a reality show or when i say more on this, right after the break. so, anyway. >> yeah. >> listen, there are some very complicated issues happening, you know, around the world, right? and he's at the seat of power in the center of it. what exactly is our foreign policy, to everyone's point on this panel, especially robin's, what is our foreign policy? >> this is the very troubling part because trump made a series of statements during the campaign, some of which made some sense, some others didn't. that in some ways is not so different from candidates who run. but ever since he's been in the white house, there has been no effort to clarify and instead, what you've had is a series of extraordinarily contradictory approaches. so he was bashing japan for much of the campaign, you know,
people didn't notice as much, but he bashed japan as much as he bashed china and the first person he has to mar-a-lago is the japanese prime minister and claims we are the greatest friends and staunchest allies and the other guy he was bashing a lots the chinese president and who's the second guest at mar-a-lago? on syria, we're going to bash isis and give syria to assad, a strategy outlined during the campaign. michael flynn talked about it. then jim mattis comes in az secretary of defense, said, no, no, no, we don't like the russians. we don't know what's going on. trump says yesterday, on monday, sean spicer says, assad has to stay in power, that's the reality of syria. today trump says no, i totally changed my mind. now, if your head isn't spinning on -- >> you lost me, actually. >> -- on what robin says is the most consequential foreign policy crisis right now, i mean,
can you imagine what the other countries in the area are thinking? they're listing to these series of stream of consciousness, incoherent, contradictory rambling statements and trying to figure out what is american foreign policy? >> robin, i want to play this and i want you to react of it. this is what president trump had to say following the toxic chemical attack in syria and the pictures in which the entire world have been horrified by. >> i will tell you that attack on children yesterday had a big impacting on me. big impact. that was a horrible, horrible thing. and i've been watching it and seeing it and it doesn't get any worse than that. and i have that flexibility and it's very, very possible, and i will tell you, it's already happened, that my attitude toward syria and assad has changed very much. it crossed a lot of lines for
me. when you kill innocent children, innocent babies, babies, little babies, with a chemical gas that is so lethal that people were shocked to hear what gas it was, that crosses many, many lines. beyond a red line. many, many lines. >> i know, robin, what did you say -- >> i don't think anyone was surprised by the kind of gas it was. assad has used his gas before. he's been battle bombs for five, six years at the least. it was horrifying. those images were horrifying, but they've been horrifying for six years. why yesterday -- why yesterday's images changed donald trump's view when six years of images did not? how does that tell you what to do in syria? does that tell you he's going to try to unseat assad? that's a whole new shift in american policy.
we need to understand it. >> i want to ask robin. clearly he was affected by it. who wouldn't when you look at the pictures? what will that lead to is the question, right? >> the irony is he's responsible for more than a dozen tweets when president obama issued a red line in 2013 in which he said it would be horrible to take on assad, not to do it would be a terrible mistake, he should focus on issues in the united states. and this is a man who faces that same challenge. as fareed said, assad has used chemical weapons repeatedly and more than 400,000 people have died. these are not the first kids to have died. tens of thousands of children have died and the president came in without a foreign policy, without a foreign policy particularly on syria, and this is where it's -- you know, it's horrifying to think that there is no obvious solution and the idea of a military option when the administration talks about, well, if the world isn't going to do anything, we're going to -- we'll act, we'll do what
it takes. and the fact is there is no military solution. whether it's on north korea or whether it's on syria that involves very complicated international diplomacy. and this is where you have the sense that the president is ill prepared for it, he doesn't have the staff for it. he hasn't thought it through. he's naive and there are basic questions about who's actually making foreign policy? rex tillerson at the state department who's been almost invisible or jared kushner who's now in charge of iraq, middle east peace, china, mexico, canada, as well as innovating the entire u.s. government? there are real serious questions about process as well as substance. >> yeah. john meacham, couple of folks are saying -- marco rubio is saying it, john mccain said earlier the assad regime was encouraged by what they were hearing. do you agree, was syria emboldened by what they were hearing from the trump administration less than a week ago? >> well, i think that unquestionably this is a time of testing for every new president,
the soviet union did it with jack kennedy, this is a familiar pattern. and i think that if you live by bluster, to some extent, you end up paying the price for it. trump offered relatively facile criticism of president obama. do any of us really think he's thought out syria's role in the world and the balance of power in the middle east? i hope he has but i wouldn't bet my mortgage payment on it. and so he's -- i think to robin's point, i think one of the great questions is not even who's making policy, but what's the connection between what the president says and what that policy is? there's no evidence in the first 100 days of the presidency or the campaign that there's necessarily a connection between what comes out of the president's mouth and what ultimately he may -- the administration may propose and i think that's one of the more destabilizing and dispiriting realities at the moment. >> go ahead, fareed. >> i think the point john made
about bluster is very important. the response to almost every issue has been bluster. mike flynn says to the iranians, we are putting iran on notice when they test a missile. rex tillerson says 20 years of engage -- diplomacy toward north korea has failed, we're going to go on a different path. nikki haley yesterday said if the world doesn't act, we will. you can't just say stuff like this when you're running the most powerful country in the world. it means something and your credibility will be diminished and eroded and will collapse when, as i think inevitably is going to happen, none of this means anything. you know, already we have seen that putting iran on notice meant nothing. already we have seen that these, you know, these boastful claims that the united states is somehow going to solve all these problems unilaterally if the chinese don't get onboard, if the russians don't get onboard,
are not going to amount to anything, and then what? what happens the next time you have to make some kind of a claim, a stake -- you know, the problem is i think the president comes out of a world in which words were very cheap. but when you're the president of the united states, words matter enormously. the rest of the world listens to them and we're just -- we're, you know, we're spending them like, i don't know, like a drunk at a casino. >> thank you, all. thank you, robin. thank you, john. thanks, fareed. see you guys soon. when we come back, i'm going to talk to a close friend of the president about how he was personally affected by those devastating imaged from syria and what action he might take.
(de♪p breath) (phone ringing) they'll call back. no one knows your ford better than ford and ford service. right now, during the big tire event, get a $140 rebate by mail, on four select tires. ♪ if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract
to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
syria and a ballistic missile test in north korea, that's a lot for donald trump to deal with 76 days into his presidency, so how is he hands handling it? i want to welcome in christopher ruddy. he's a close friend to the president. we always enjoy having him on. christopher, thanks for joining us. we heard the president say the syria gas attack has changed him. you know him very well. what does he mean? how so? >> well, i think he's a pretty empathetic guy and probably sees what he all see, the carnage this chemical attack did and the deaths and he realizes i think that assad's a bad guy, the question he has had, we all have had is who replaces assad if you get rid of him? and let's remember, you guys, i was listening to your last segment, everybody forgets he inherited this situation. a terrible situation there in syria. president obama had the chance to retaliate against the use of
chemical weapons. i supported president obama's right to use force then, which he declined to do after saying he would, the red line, all that. and now we have president trump who has great resolve -- >> the president -- >> i would not want to be -- >> this current president said the former president should not have used force. he actually tweeted about it. >> well, i'm not sure exactly what he said at the time but i do think now he's saying that he would -- this is the second use, i know -- >> he encouraged president obama on twitter at the time not to go into syria at the -- a red line. >> i can tell you at the time that i supported the use of force. i can't tell you what president trump said or didn't say at the time. i'm not aware of that tweet. but if he did, i'm sure he had some justification why he shouldn't have done it. some people felt he should have gotten -- >> we have it up on the screen,
christopher, again. i'll let you -- "president obama, do not attack syria. there is no upside and tremendous downside. save your powder for another and more important day." that's what he said. >> well, even -- you know what's really good, president trump changes his mind which you guys don't think he ever does. and if he sees facts can have him change his mind about things. i think we'll see this where, you know, he's been very strongly critical of china. i think he's going to offer some olive branches probably to them to try to win them over. i, you know, he's been very friendly to putin, but he's not been naive about putin. so i think -- i think we have somebody who's being deliberate. he's not being -- some of the language i heard in the last segment like the world is in crisis, collapsing, you know, i just don't get that sense and you have our allies like jordan and -- >> you said you don't get the sense -- >> -- saudi arabia --
>> that the -- i'm sorry for the delay. you don't feel that the world is in crisis? >> it's not in any more crisis than -- >> he's saying he inherited -- >> -- what barack obama left. >> he's saying he inherited a mess. >> yeah. that obama -- obama inherited a mess. i don't think the whole world is in crisis right now. we have a crisis with north korea that's escalating and we have the syria situation, but it's not -- it's not a global conflict. >> okay. i want to talk about this russian investigation. the president first accused barack obama of tapping his phones and that was discredited. totally discredited by the fbi. now in a "the new york times" interview he's accusing the form er national security adviser, susan rise of committing a crime without a shred of evidence. why is he making these unsubstantiated charges when he's the president of the united states? >> right.
well, you know, i would question your first assertion which is that the fbi totally discredited. they said they were not aware of any surveillance. we now know that certain members of the trump campaign and their associates were surveilled and that there were intercepts and we now know that the national -- >> christopher, that's simply not true. simply not true. >> president obama unmasked -- >> they were collateral or foreign agents were being surveilled and they were incidental in that collection which is a normal process in the collection -- normal process when you're surveilling -- >> so, don -- >> -- foreign agents. >> don, you make -- i'm sure you make as i do, foreign phone calls. under federal law, the nsa and other people can intercept those calls without a legal warrant as far as i understand. now, that's fine. there's nothing wrong. that's an incidental surveillance of your conversation. if the national security adviser says get me every phone call that don lemon made that we
incidentally collected, that is a targeting. >> that's not how it works. the national security adviser cannot do that. by the way, if it was a phone call and they surveilled and wanted to get all the information about me, i don't care because i'm not doing anything that would -- is unreasonable or illegal. so go ahead. look at my phone calls if you're the national security adviser. >> no, you don't have a right to just look at every american's phone call. you have to have a reason to do it. and to go out -- >> that's not what happened. that's not what happened. >> susan rice -- >> that is a talking point that's being -- people who don't understand how the surveillance process works. the national security adviser can't call up someone and say i want all the phone calls on christopher ruddy or don lemon. it doesn't work that way. >> they obtained, apparently, intercepted phone communications and surveillance of trump associates. they were masked -- >> how do you know that? >> -- so they didn't know who
they were. we already know susan rice is not denying that she asked for those documents to be unmasked. so it's pretty clear that -- and the white house -- we know that there have been press reports that there was an unmasking. she hasn't denied that she asked for the unmasking. she just said i -- >> she hasn't confirmed, either, that she did ask for them as well. >> well -- >> so a lot of that -- >> it's not true. why are you saying it's not true? she's not denying it. >> there's no evidence and no proof. someone can say, you know, don lemon went to mcdonald's today and then should there be an investigation? that doesn't mean it's true just because someone says it. >> don, that's exactly the point, isn't it? and a number of people denied that they ordered the wiretapping of donald trump's campaign but susan rice won't deny this. so it makes you a little -- it makes you wonder. we do know that clapper said on
"meet the press" several weeks ago that they found no evidence after looking at all of these intercepts of collusion between the trump campaign and the russians, but meanwhile, we do know that classified top-secret conversations with the president of the united states, donald trump, with world leaders, were leaked illegally -- >> no, we don't know that. >> -- within hours. >> we don't know that. the reason that we're reporting is because there are several intelligence agencies and the fbi is investigating if there was possible collusion. that is the truth, but the other part is not true. >> don. >> we don't actually know -- >> you're obviously not reading the "washington post." >> i am reading -- >> they leaked -- >> christopher -- >> they leaked the conversation with the -- >> i also read -- hang on. i'll let you finish. i've been reading that and i also have been reading information about exactly what it takes to intercept foreign agents and also exactly what hoops you have to jump through in order to unmask someone which we don't have evidence that it
actually happened or that she ordered the unmasking or asked for the unmasking. >> i think there should be an investigation. you know, when somebody revealed the name of valerie plame, there was hysteria in the media. there were calls for an investigation. there was eventually a special prosecutor. people were charged with crimes. we now have a serious allegation that people were unmasked that were trump associates and that may have been improper -- >> listen, i'm not saying anything should or not should not be investigating. >> cool, i'm with you. >> it's important the american people are informed exactly about what is going on, in order for someone to be unmasked which we're going to do, by way, at the top of the hour, explain exactly what it takes in order to do that. >> i agree. >> we shouldn't just put talking points out there or put information out there that has not been proven or just an assertion because someone said it or someone is trying to make the president's initial tweet which was not factual trying to make it factual.
we shouldn't do that, christopher, that's doing a disservice to the american public. >> do you agree, don, do you agree when the president's private conversation with the mexican president and the australian prime minister classified documents were leaked? within several hours of his conversation. >> what if it's mexico or -- >> that was a violation of -- >> you're assuming that someone with a high-ranking position in the united states leaked that. and some of those calls, those calls -- >> don, come on. >> -- they're actually -- >> please. >> -- memos of the calls. you're assuming someone in the united states did that. >> don, are you drinking kool-aid tonight? come on, really. you think the mexicans and australians leaked the conversation? >> i never really drank -- >> to the washington -- >> i'm not making assertions. here's the difference. here's the difference. i'm not making -- >> to think, come on -- >> i'm not making an assumption about anyone leaking it and not saying who leaked it.
you're making an assumption that someone leaked it for a political purpose. >> well, the press reports indicated that they were u.s. transcriptions of that. >> okay. >> so, i mean, think that's very serious, but again, cnn doesn't discuss that serious violation. i personally think all of these things, they should be investigated, but it's missing the big point. you know, the president is doing a lot of good things. you know, he's been focusing on jobs. i think that's a big part of this meeting with china. nobody ever talks about this. he's the first president to make jobs a priority. >> with all due respect, he doesn't really talk about -- >> even before he was inaugurated. >> he talks about other things a lot more, christopher, come on, be honest, than he talks about jobs. that's really why he was elected. >> you have not been at the white house lately. >> well, he should come outside of the white house. >> you're saying you are reading the newspapers. a day hasn't gone by, don, he hasn't had a meeting at the white house to announce some jobs program, jobs creation.
>> a day doesn't go by, christopher, that he doesn't talk -- make some assertion with no proof or say something or tweet something that is wildly just outrageous as well. you don't think that people are going to pay attention to outrageous tweets or outrageous assertions with no fact? here's the thing, if you're the president of the united states and actually believe the former intelligence director of national intelligence, what have you, or security adviser, excuse me, if you actually think she committed a crime, you have the disposal of every intelligence agency at your fingertips, wouldn't you quietly, a quiet power is much more assertive than making wild accusations. wouldn't you ask them to bring all of the information and then have it investigated and then have that person -- >> good question. >> -- prosecuted. >> to ask the president. i don't speak for him. i don't speak for him. i do think -- i like the fact he tweets and communicates directly. i would like to see -- >> his supporters don't like it. they wish he would stop. >> well, i think it would be good if there was a better process for those tweets and that a couple of eyeballs looked at them before they went out.
i wouldn't go so far as say they're unsubstantiated yet. i do think that it would be better for the messaging, i think as the administration settles in, we give him a little time to settle in. i think you'll see a more of a process around that. i hope so. but i do think -- i like the fact that he communicates with 25 million americans and can bypass cnn or newsmax or fox news or whoever he wants to. >> i don't think people feel the same way you do. i think people like the commander in chief, the president is communicating with the american people. i just think as you said the process is different and that making outrageous claims, even his staunchest supporters are saying, okay, mr. president, enough of that already, you're the leader of the free world, it's time for you to act like it. >> no surprise he's a guy that speaks his mind, he's always been that way. and it's going to be, you know, difficult for him to fit into the traditional box. he's learning just like you and me. >> christopher and i know each other. we're going back and forth.
there's no tension between us. this is how we do as the kids say. i want to ask you about this. i think this is important. this is in "the new york times" today. the president commented on bill o'reilly, sexual harassment accusations. he said "i think he's a person i know well, he is a good person, i think he shouldn't have settled. personally i think he shouldn't have settled because you should have taken it all the way. i don't think bill did anything wrong." you know, you're talking about -- he talks about jobs but he's defending bill o'reilly, defending himself after he says he's going to grab a woman's genitals on the "access hollywood" tape, defended roger ailes and took his advice of the sexual harassment. roger ailes was fired. do you understand why people believe he has issues when it comes to women? >> well, i think the president is a very loyal guy. bill o'reilly's been a friend of his, has backed him, supported him and given him a fair forum which he doesn't necessarily get at other networks. i think he's probably very appreciative of that and he's
also been the victim of some false allegations. people have said some rather incredible, unbelievable and outrageous, to steal a word from you, things about president trump that i think are false. so i think he has some sympathy there. i do think with the situation with bill o'reilly that it's a serious allegation. you have over $13 million has been paid in settlements, some people might call it hush money, to these women. and i think it needs to be more investigated and i think fox needs for their own news credibility to be more candid and forthright about the situation there. >> any final thoughts? because i want to make sure that you got your say, christopher ruddy because we love having you on. any parting words, as they say? >> well, i, again, we are not even at the 100-day mark for the president. this is a man who is not naturally a politician. he has great political instincts
and i think the public is giving him a little more latitude and slack than people like you or other folks from the other networks and i think that we should give him an opportunity. let's give him six months before we maybe come to some fair judgment about how the first part of his administration is going. and i also think we should focus on some of the good things. >> fair point. >> like jobs. >> fair point. so you know, i'm not -- you said i'm -- i'm not judging him. i'm just questioning. that's what i do, i ask questions. so, and you do a good job at answering. thank you, chris ruddy. appreciate it. see you soon. all right. >> thank you. when we come right back, jared kushner's role in his father-in-law's administration is getting bigger and bigger but can he get anything done?
steel. that's what it's called. you talk about the supermanish amount of responsibility jared kushner has been given. he is a senior adviser to the president and is in charge of selve key agendas including mid east pacific northwest, u.s./mexico relations, criminal justice reform, you say you see this as ridiculous. so why do you think president trump has given jared kushner so much responsibility? >> because i don't think president trump is serious about governing, or i don't think he understands how the government works. you don't just take someone who you believe to be kind of charmed as he does his son-in-law and say your in charge of this, you're in charge of that. he almost feels like government is force of personality. but meanwhile, you get key positions that aren't filled in defense, key positions that aren't filled in department of state. rex tillerson still hasn't seemed to have found his footing. jared kushner is not the answer to all of this. actually running the government the way it's supposed to be run is the answer. >> what qualifications does jared kushner have? >> that's a great question.
i know many people who have had dealings with him over time. they say he is a very intelligent guy, considerable charm. he is a 36-year-old man who has not a stitch of government experience, who has not a stitch of diplomatic experience. and while that doesn't mean he doesn't have a fresh perspective that might, you know, have value to it, it does suggest saying he is the first person able to solve the israeli-palestinian conflict is the epitome of magical thinking. >> for someone with no political experience and no governing experience. you wrote in the piece said earlier of how important loyalty and family are to him. perhaps having, you know, key family members or key people around him, maybe that gives him some sort of comfort. do you think americans are at risk when the key people that interest r there, like jared kushner and ivanka have no experience in governing and politics? >> i think you want people around you who are totally fresh eyes. donald trump, the premium he places on fresh perspectives.
>> steve ban don. >> some that of is fine. but private sector experience is fetishized to a ridiculous extent. you need a mix of people with fresh ideas and people who know how the government works. and what we have seen so far is we've seen botched executive orders that the court has challenged and stopped. we've seen a failed attempt at health care legislation. these are things that suggest that what trump needs isn't fresh eyes from the private sector, but people who know how the levers of power in washington work. >> and maybe he is the fresh eye. >> he is the fresh eyes. >> exactly. so my question what do you think the people who are experienced, and working in government, what is their reaction to having someone as green as, you know, a jared kushner in charge? >> i think almost everyone else in the administration is looking at jared kushner saying how can i make him work for me? he has the president's ear. he has this ridiculously large portfolio. at the very least i want to bend him to my purposes. as we sit here now, the story that is evolving is whether
jared kushner in fact had the main role in displacing or diminishing steve bannon. >> did you get to see gayle king's interview with tsvangiiv trump? >> i did. >> she said when i disagree with my dad, i let him know. but when i need to get on board, i get on board and do it. >> i completely respect that i don't expect them to come out and say wow, he just said the craziest thing, i don't believe it. although i do sometimes think they leak that reporters. what issue i have is they especially helped this man get elected and behind the scenes they tell us oh, you're really lucky to have us here. we can minimize the damage. if damage was the concern why were they working so hard to elect him. >> did you hear about the publicist they hired. josh rafael. he recently been heading up, thank you, heading up communications for bloomhouse production and require to that
he represented kushner's companies, one of kushner's companies. what you say? >> this is more of that magical thinking. if a person is known by us, trusted by us and has done dynamic things in the private sector, well, that's the answer for government. we have too many of those in the trump administration now and we don't have enough people who are hard headed realists and know how to get things done in a very practical and particular and methodical way. >> thank you. i appreciate having you on. we'll be right back. are you done yet?
does it look like i'm done? shouldn't you be at work? [ mockingly ] "shouldn't you be at work?" todd. hold on. [ engine revs ] arcade game: fist pump! your real bike's all fixed. man, you guys are good! well, we are the number-one motorcycle insurer in the country. -wait. you have a real motorcycle? and real insurance, with 24-hour customer support. arcade game: wipeout! oh! well... i retire as champion. game hog! champion. take 5, guys. tired of your bladder always cutting into your day? you may have overactive bladder, or oab. that's it! we really need to get with the program and see the doctor. take charge and ask your doctor about myrbetriq (mirabegron) for oab symptoms of urgency, frequency and leakage. it's the first and only oab treatment in its class. myrbetriq may cause serious allergic reactions. if you experience swelling of the face, lips, throat or tongue,
or difficulty breathing, stop taking myrbetriq and tell your doctor right away. myrbetriq may increase blood pressure. tell your doctor right away if you have trouble emptying your bladder or have a weak urine stream. myrbetriq may affect or be affected by other medications. before taking myrbetriq, tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems. common side effects include increased blood pressure, common cold symptoms, urinary tract infection, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness and headache. okay, time to do this! don't let your bladder always take the lead. ask your doctor if myrbetriq is right for you. and visit myrbetriq.com to learn more.
w...i was always searching for ways to manage my symptoms. i thought i had it covered. then i realized managing was all i was doing. when i finally told my doctor, he said humira was for people like me who have tried other medications,... but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. in clinical studies, the majority of patients on humira saw significant symptom relief... ...and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections... ...including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers,... including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions,... ...and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb,... ...hepatitis b, are prone to infections, ...or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. if you're still just managing your symptoms, ask your gastroenterologist about humira.
with humira, remission is possible. president trump making an explosive allegation against a former top aide to president barack obama. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. suggesting susan rice may have committed a crime in requesting names of intelligence agents be unmasked. here he is offering no evidence about this. and fox news host bill o'reilly under fire. dozens of sponsors leaving his top-rated show. can he survive allegations of sexual harassment? but first, there has been a lot of discussion about masking and unmasking, leaking