Skip to main content

tv   State of the Union With Jake Tapper  CNN  June 11, 2017 9:00am-10:01am PDT

9:00 am
>> for the rest of my chat with andy, log on to itunes or and listen to our latest podcast. while there, sign up for our nightly newsletter as well. sign up at see you back on television this time next week. showdown. fired fbi director james comey's dramatic testimony. >> those were lies, plain and simple. >> revealing how he crafted his case against the president. >> i needed to get that out into the public square. >> and trump strikes back. >> no collusion. no obstruction. he's a leaker. >> saying comey is the one who is lying. >> some of the things that he said just weren't true. >> and he's willing to testify under oath to prove it. >> 100%. plus, secret tapes? >> lordy, i hope there are tapes.
9:01 am
>> is the president secretly recording conversations? >> i'll tell you about that maybe sometime in the very near future. oh, you're going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer. >> if so, what happens next? two leaders of the senate investigation join me live in minutes, and the best political minds will be here with insights on another wild week in washington. hello, i'm brianna keilar in for jake tapper in washington from the state of our union is pointing fingers. president trump is in a war of words with fired fbi director james comey, who accused the president of asking him to back off the flynn investigation earlier this year. trump came out swinging, with a strong denial of the account. >> he did say under oath that you told him to let the flynn, you said you hoped the flynn investigation you could let, he could let go. >> i didn't say that. >> well he lied about that?
9:02 am
>> i didn't say that. i will i will tell you i didn't say that. and there would be nothing wrong if i did say it, according to everybody that i've read today, but i did not say that. >> comey's testimony also put the spotlight on attorney general jeff sessions, who recused himself from the russia investigation but recommended comey's firing. sessions announced yesterday that he plans to testify before the senate intelligence committee on tuesday saying in a statement, "in light of reports regarding mr. comey's recent testimony before the senate select committee on intelligence, it is important that i have an opportunity to address these matters in the appropriate forum. the senate intelligence committee is the most appropriate forum for such matters, as it has been conducting an investigation and has access to relevant, classified information." and i'm joined now by a leading democrat on the intelligence committee, senator dianne feinstein. thank you so much for taking time with us this sunday. >> thank you, brianna. >> you heard that from the attorney general he's going to
9:03 am
testify tuesday before the intelligence committee. is that going to happen and is it going to be public? >> don't know whether it will happen, don't know whether it's going to be public and i challenge the jurisdiction, to some extent, i'm on both committees, as you know. >> judiciary and intelligence. >> yes, and i believe that the judiciary committee has the oversight responsibility for the justice department, and therefore, it is very fitting for the attorney general to appear there. i've written two letters to senator grassley, suggesting that. i pointed out that his predecessor, mr. holder, had a hearing of oversight in june of the first year of his term, as sessions has not, and sessions ought to come back before the judiciary committee. >> you said in that letter to senator grassley, who is the top republican on the judiciary committee, that you want him to investigate potential obstruction of justice.
9:04 am
what tells you that that is appropriate, that that has happened? >> well, let me tell you in the first place, i've served for 16 years on intelligence, and 24 on judiciary. the intelligence staff is just that. it's intelligence staff. most are not lawyers, and they are restricted to the world of intelligence. the judiciary staff are all lawyers, most very good lawyers, and so there is an opportunity to look at the law with respect to obstruction of justice, to hold a hearing, and also to have those relevant people come before the judiciary committee. i've been very concerned by the fact that both director coats and director rogers refused to answer the questions when put to them by members of the intelligence committee. >> they were asked essentially if they had been pressured by president trump, and they said
9:05 am
they would talk about that in a closed hearing. have they spoken in a closed hearing to senators? >> well, no, they were not in a closed hearing. the closed hearing that afternoon was just with the former director of the fbi. >> but you feel that that's obstruction of justice, even though they've indicated a willingness to talk about it in a classified briefing? >> i don't know whether it's obstruction of justice, and i don't intend to draw any conclusions until investigations are finished. i think this is very important, and i believe, i think the intelligence committee is doing good work, and should continue. i think senator burr and senator warner did a good job in the chairs at the hearing, but i also know that there's another part of this, and that part should not be given short shrift, and it has to do with the department of justice. >> what we heard from former director comey was that he said
9:06 am
"president trump tried to derail the fbi's investigation of michael flynn" pressured him to do that, he of course was the former national security adviser to the president who was fired. president trump and his personal lawyer, they say this isn't true and they've accused comey of not telling the truth, of perjury. here's what he said. >> the president never in form or substance directed or suggested that mr. comey stop investigating anyone, including the president never suggested that mr. comey "let flynn go." the president also never told mr. comey "i need loyalty. i expect loyalty." >> the president says he didn't say it. the fbi director says he did. who do you believe? >> well, at this point, i believe the fbi director. i know him the best. i've observed him the longest.
9:07 am
i know he has his own band of integrity. disagreed with him on the emails, let him know that mono syllabically. but in this kind of thing, he's not going to lie. he's just not in him to do this. so i'm one that believes we need the judiciary committee to step up and carry its weight on these hearings as well. >> that was, of course, the focus of this hearing, but there is something else we learned separately from jim comey, and that was some tough words that he had for the former attorney general, loretta lynch, under president obama. comey thinks that lynch improperly injected politics into that investigation of hillary clinton's emails. here's what he said about that. >> the attorney general had directed me not to call it an investigation, but instead to call it a matter, which confused me and concerned me, but that was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude i have to step away from the
9:08 am
department, if we're to close this case credibly. >> comey said that lynch, the request gave him a queasy feeling. he felt clearly that loretta lynch was giving cover to the clinton campaign. was she? >> i can't answer that. i would have a queasy feeling, too, though, to be candid with you. i think we need to know more about that and there's only way to know about it, and that's to have the judiciary committee take a look at that. >> so you think it's worth investigating, if in a way this was semantic cover given to the clinton campaign. it was clearly an investigation being described in the matter. >> yes, but this is a separated investigation we're talking about, and i don't think we should mix the two. right now, this is the total integrity of the president of the united states. this is a very big deal, brianna. it should be all hands on deck, and everybody should welcome a
9:09 am
second committee getting involved, particularly on the technical legal aspects of obstruction of justice. i have no doubt -- well, you see, there is also time, manner and place. when this episode took place that the president's referring to he did not say was on february 14th. there was a scheduled counter intelligence briefing. the vice president, the attorney general, the fbi director, jared kushner, and others were in the room. the president asked that the room be cleared. the attorney general apparently hung back. i thought the attorney general should have said something. this man works for me. i think i should be here, too, mr. president, but the fbi director ended up alone, and that's kind of where this began,
9:10 am
and that's where i want to talk about the flynn case. and can't you just let it go? now, "can't you just let it go," are the words that are fairly indelibly impressed upon my mind. >> what comey says the president said. and what the president says he did not. >> yes. and there were no witnesses. if there are tapes, please, and the president's equivocal on this, bring those tapes forward. >> house minority leader nancy pelosi, a fellow democrat from your home state, hometown, she said friday there's no question that president trump "abused his power" and she also questioned his fitness for office. let's listen. >> i'm very worried about his fitness. the president's fitness for office is something that is being called into question. >> do you agree that? do you worry about the president's fitness for office? >> i think -- here is the
9:11 am
problem. republican or democrat, when you serve in either the house or the senate, you are accustomed to stability in the white house. you are accustomed to the protocols that go along with it. you are very careful about what you do and what you say. all of that is out the window now, and so what we are -- >> does it make him fit or unfit? >> -- is that every day is a new crisis and that has a destabilizing effect because we've got big issues to solve. we've got a huge opioid epidemic, we've got health care that needs to be tended to. >> but does it hit that level of fitness, where you might say that he is unfit as nancy pelosi did? >> well, i wouldn't say -- i'm not there yet, but i understand why the leader feels the way she does. there's an unpredictability, he projects an instability. he projects a different issue
9:12 am
every day, doing policy by tweets is really a shake-up for us, because there's no justification presented. there's no state department analysis. there's no nothing. and now there's a reluctance to respond to questions submitted by democrats, even the democratic ranking member, for example, if i were to write a letter as ranking member of judiciary to the white house, and ask some questions, not controversial, they don't necessarily have to answer me. >> yes. >> that's never existed before, regardless of party. >> senator dianne feinstein, thank you so much for joining us. >> you're welcome. and coming up, are there secret white house recordings of the president's conversations? congress is demanding answers. you heard one senator do that. new details on their possible existence, and when we'll know, next. tech: when you schedule with safelite autoglass, you get a text when we're on our way.
9:13 am
you can see exactly when we'll arrive. i'm micah with safelite. customer: thanks for coming, it's right over here. tech: giving you a few more minutes for what matters most. take care. kids singing: safelite® repair, safelite® replace. peobut they're different.ind it's nice to remove artificial ingredients. kind never had to. we choose real ingredients like almonds, peanuts and a drizzle of dark chocolate. give kind a try. ♪ asmy family tree,ing i discovered a woman named marianne gaspard... it was her french name. then she came to louisiana as a slave. i became curious where in africa she was from. so i took the ancestry dna test to find out more about my african roots. the ancestry dna results were really specific. they told me all of these places in west africa. i feel really proud of my lineage, and i feel really proud of my ancestry. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story, get started for free at how if guests book direct ater, and stay twice
9:14 am
they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at thithis is the new new york.e? think again. we are building new airports all across the state. new roads and bridges. new mass transit. new business friendly environment. new lower taxes. and new university partnerships to grow the businesses of tomorrow today. learn more at ♪
9:15 am
you doyou'll see whatet but in you're really made of. after five hours of spinning and one unfortunate ride on the gravitron, your grandkids spot a 6 foot banana that you need to win. in that moment, you'll be happy you partnered with a humana care manager and got your health back on track. because that banana isn't coming home with you until that bell sings. great things are ahead of you when your health is ready for them. at humana, we can help you with a personalized plan for your health for years to come. and sometimes i struggle to sleep at night,blind. and stay awake during the day. this is called non-24. learn more by calling 844-824-2424. or visit
9:16 am
can we at least analyze customer can we push the offer online? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. you're saying the new app will go live monday? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes.
9:17 am
welcome back. president trump inched closer this week to revealing whether or not there are recordings of his conversations with fired fbi director jim comey. >> when will you tell us about the recordings? >> over a fairly short period of time. >> are there tapes, sir? >> oh, you're going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer, don't worry. >> comey publicly called for his tapes' release if they exist, during his blockbuster testimony thursday and now congress is commanding answers. the bipartisan leaders of the russia investigation and the house of representatives sent a letter to white house counsel don mcgahn after the president's
9:18 am
statement asking if any recording or memoranda exist and if so, to turn them over by next friday. how is all of this going to affect the investigation? with us now to talk about that, republican senator susan collins. she is on the senate intelligence committee. senator, thanks so much for joining us. >> my pleasure. >> i want to ask you about something the president has been cagey about, and that is these tapes, of course. i wonder if you would support issuing a subpoena to the white house. right now it's just a request coming from congress, would you support issuing a subpoena for the recordings or any documents that might come from that? >> this is an issue that the president should have cleared up in his press conference. he should give a straight yes or no to the answer, to the question of whether or not the tapes exist, and he should voluntarily turn them over not only to the senate intelligence committee, but to the special counsel. so i don't think a subpoena
9:19 am
should be necessary, and i don't understand why the president just doesn't clear this matter up once and for all. >> if he doesn't, and a subpoena would be necessary to find this out, you support that? >> i would be fine with issuing a subpoena, but that most likely would come from the special counsel's office. >> okay. president trump, speaking of the special counsel, said he would 100% be willing to testify under oath about his interactions. do you think that that is something that should go before robert mueller, the special counsel, or do you think it should go before congress or do you think both? >> the president should fully cooperate with a special counsel and he's indicated that he will do so. we have to keep in mind that the focus of the senate intelligence committee's investigation is to the extent of russian influence
9:20 am
on our elections last fall, and whether or not there was collusion, collaboration, cooperation between the russians and members of president trump's campaign team. so they are two different investigations with two different imif a -- emphases under way right now. both are critical. both are really important to our country. >> so it sounds like if he were to talk to, you would be comfortable with him just talking to bob mueller? >> yes, i would be. >> and if he does, should video of that testimony be made public, do you think? >> well, that really depends on how the special counsel decides to proceed. it would be unusual if in the midst of the investigation he were to release a video or a transcript, of the
9:21 am
investigation, before the investigation is concluded. that is frustrating, because we all want to know all of the information, but keep in mind, that his job is to determine whether or not there are any violations of criminal laws, and he wants to make sure that he has all the evidence put together, rather than releasing it in a piecemeal basis. our committee will release a public report at the end of our investigation, and we're proceeding, and i really commend the two leaders of our committee for what i thought was an excellent series of hearings last week. >> bipartisan support backing up what you just said there. the former fbi director says the president pressured him to back off from investigating general michael flynn. he wrote a note of an interaction with the president at the time he had it, saying as much. the president says that never happened. so who do you believe? president trump or james comey? >> i found director comey,
9:22 am
former director comey's testimony to be candid, to be thorough, and he testified under oath. so i believe that the information that he gave our committee is what he believed happened. that doesn't eliminate the possibility that there was a misinterpretation. what i don't understand is when the president did say to him that he should let go of the flynn investigation, which was clearly wrong on the president's part. why the director did not say back to the president, mr. president, that is so inappropriate for you to do that. the independence of the fbi is really important, and we cannot be having discussions like this. i think he should have said that at the time. >> if it was so inappropriate, then it sounds as if you understand in the context of what happened that that was some sort of direction coming from
9:23 am
president trump, so does that make what he said in the rose garden this week a lie? >> certainly mr. comey understood it as a directive. the exact language makes it more ambiguous because he says the president says "i hope you can see your way to letting the flynn matter go." that's still wrong for him to do that. whether it's illegal is a whole nother issue, and that's up to the independent counsel, but it was wrong of the president to even bring up the subject. >> if he said to you, senator, in the white house, if president trump was talking to you and he said senator collins, i hope you can vote for the health care bill, i mean, how would you interpret that? you would interpret that as a directive, right? >> actually, i wouldn't. i think he would be saying truly that he hoped that i would,
9:24 am
since he knows i have a lot of reservations about it. >> okay. >> but listen, the conversation should not have occurred. there's just no doubt about that. >> so you told cnn on friday that perhaps it was the inexperience of the president essentially that's what you said, that maybe he thought all of the meetings with the fbi director should be one on one. is that an excuse for him? i mean, is that just an excuse or do you think that's really something that is, makes, i don't want to say makes sense but really could have happened? >> let me go back to the first meeting that the fbi director had with president trump. at that meeting, which had several people in it, the fbi director asked that everyone leave the room except for him -- >> true. >> -- and president trump. >> i'm running out of time, senator, that's an important
9:25 am
point you make. then the next meeting is in person, a dinner between the two, which is something that takes lead time, clearly by this point in time the president should have been aware that this was inappropriate, so how is it possible that this was just him being inexperienced and taking cues from the first meeting, if this is something that was set up with considerable advance from the white house. >> my theory is the president thinks that's how you interact with the fbi director, but someone should have stepped in. the fbi director should have stepped in, the deputy attorney general, the white house counsel's office, to explain to the president, it's not an excuse. the president clearly does not fully understand or appreciate the boundaries, but he should. i'm not excusing his behavior but i'm saying there were a lot of people in government who should have set him straight. and we don't know whether they
9:26 am
tried to. >> maybe a potential explanation, if not an excuse. we hear you on that. i do want to ask you about health care before i let you go. >> right. >> there's a quarter million people in your home state, maine, and they rely on medicaid. are you willing to support a health care bill that would result in people losing medicaid coverage? >> i am not at all comfortable with the house bill and i would oppose that bill. the senate bill is still in progress. we haven't seen the actual language. we're trying to influence the direction of that, but a bill that results in 23 million people losing coverage is not a bill that i can support. so we'll see what the senate comes up with. it's still being drafted. >> it seems it would be almost impossible for a bill that does not cut some medicaid to make it through a republican senate and a republican house. do you think you're being heard
9:27 am
on what you're saying about people losing medicaid? >> certainly the outline of the senate bill is far superior to the house bill, but we've got a ways to go yet. now, there are ways to reduce the cost of medicaid, and picked -- you can do that through managed care such as the indiana model, and that has produced better health outcomes and lower costs, so there are ways to reduce the cost of medicaid without throwing people off the rolls. >> senate collins, thank you so much, senator susan collins of maine joining us this sunday. we appreciate it. >> thank you. coming up, over 19 million people watched james comey's testimony on capitol hill this week, but president trump may have set the stage for an even bigger testimony, his own. is he about to go under oath? we have that next.
9:28 am
today you aren't just but a whole bunch of bundts. and each one could be it's own little sticky situation. but the only thing that's going to stick is a perfect landing. you pam do it! (quiet chatter) (soft gasp) (record scratching) ( ♪ ) (excited chatter) ( ♪ ) various: whoa! (mixed exclamations) ( ♪ ) (cheering) ( ♪ )
9:29 am
(cheering) i decided to see if there was a way for design to play a... ...positive role in what was going on in the world. there's a jacket that's reflective for visibility... ...a sleeping bag jacket, jackets that turn into tents. i usually do my fashion sketches on the computer. i love drawing on the screen. there's no lag time at all. it feels just like my markers. with fashion, you can dress people and help people. it's really cool to see your work come to life.
9:30 am
be the you who doesn't cover your moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. be the you who shows up in that dress. who hugs a friend. who is done with treatments that don't give you clearer skin. be the you who controls your psoriasis with stelara® just 4 doses a year after 2 starter doses. stelara® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before starting stelara® tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. always tell your doctor if you have any signs of infection, have had cancer, if you develop any new skin growths or if anyone in your house needs or has recently received a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to stelara® or any of its ingredients. most people using stelara® saw 75% clearer skin and the majority were rated as cleared or minimal at 12 weeks. be the you who talks to your dermatologist about stelara®.
9:31 am
9:32 am
he did say under oath that you told him to let the flynn -- you said you hoped the flynn investigation he could let go. >> i didn't say that. >> so he lied about that? >> well, i didn't say that. i will tell you, i didn't say that. >> so he said those things under oath, would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of -- >> 100%. >> president trump ready to go under oath in the russia investigation. he responded to reporters' questions about his conversations with former fbi director james comey, who testified that the president asked him to back off the flynn investigation.
9:33 am
it has been a remarkable week in washington. here with their insights on it, former trump campaign strategist david urban, democratic congressman luis gutierrez, former republican house intelligence committee chairman mike rogers and neera tanden, president and ceo of the center for american progress. david, to you. will the president regret this pledge of 100% he's willing to testify? >> no, the president is not going to regret it at all. the president wants to cooperate. the president will cooperate, has been cooperating and will continue to do so. listen, director mueller has an investigation ongoing and it will be ongoing for quite some time. the president will have a great big, has a legal team, has a lawyer in place, and will listen to his lawyer but the president will cooperate -- i don't suspect that he will not for one second, so what he said he will follow through on. >> we asked the question over and over, do you believe the former fbi director or do you believe president trump on this? it's a he said/he said thing,
9:34 am
but in a court of law, chairman, that's not always the case, right, considering that comey had memos here. those get some weight, don't they? >> they do. the one problem here i think on both sides of this -- well, first of all that we're talking about this at all with the russia influence in the investigation hardly came up with those influence in the election excuse me hardly even came up with those things, with all the world problems, we are narrowly focused and what i saw in that hearing was really i think confirming my mother's old adage that if you're going to practice the lesson of meanness, be careful, it might just take. and what you saw there was two personal individuals, both pretty angry about what was going on, play out in the court of public opinion. bad day for the president in the court of public opinion. what i saw there did not rise to the legal status of obstruction of justice. >> you're shaking your head, neera. >> what happened here is the fbi
9:35 am
director took contemporaneous notes so it does add to the legal weight of what happened and we must have watched different hearings, seemed to me i saw the merits but it doesn't matter what i think. it matters what a court of law and what the special prosecutor thinks and i think after what the president said on friday i hope he will obviously cooperate with the special prosecutor, but we need to get answers in the public, so i hope he will testify in congress about this conversation. director comey has testified. he should testify. we should be able to see the president answer questions specific questions about this, not at a press conference but with the senate. >> i do want to talk about something donald trump jr. said because it's fascinating, this was an interview to fox news, and he seems to suggest that the president did indeed tell james comey, hey, i hope this happens, i hope that you will let this go. take a listen. >> when he tells you to do something, guess what? there's no ambiguity in it.
9:36 am
there's no, hey, i'm hoping. you and i are friends. hey, i hope this happens but you got to do your job. that's what he told comey and for this guy as a politician to write a memo i felt threatened. he felt threatened? he didn't do anything. >> hey, that's what he told comey. now the president says that is not what he told comey. he's saying that he didn't express any hope on this, congressman. >> well here's i think, he said 100% he's ready to testify under oath. comey's already testified under oath. there's one thing we all know about fbi and fbi agents you cannot lie to an fbi agent, that in itself is a lie. >> it's a crime. >> it's a crime, and he came under oath and spoke, so here's what i think we should do, we should call his bluff. this is the same president of the united states that said to us 100% i'm going to give you my income taxes. if i could just finish -- that
9:37 am
way we could all get a word in. he said 100% i'm going to give you my income taxes, 100%. 100%. we've never seen them. let's call his bluff now, and let's remember, as my friend mr. rogers suggested to us, what happened to the investigation into the undue influence of a foreign country in our electoral process? but at the same time this has gone from an intelligence committee setting to judiciary committee setting. >> they're doing that with -- >> if i could just finish, if i could just finish. why is that? because now we're talking about what the president said to the director of the fbi. >> is this a problem -- >> he asked the vice president to leave the room. he asked the vice president to leave the room and he asked the attorney general to leave the room when he had that conversation. >> so we've heard from -- >> david, just back to the point
9:38 am
about don jr., he is saying that his father did do this thing that his father says he didn't. >> two people were in the room. inappropriate we've heard from numerous legal scholars, okay, lawyers, professors. other than jeff toobin, nobody thinks there's a crime here. it's my turn. it's my turn neera, sorry. we're taking turns, it's mine. >> but there are -- >> inappropriate. no, wait a minute, can i finish? >> david, there are people who say this is a problem. >> may i finish? inappropriate doesn't rise to the level of specific corrupt intent. >> it could and that's what some legal experts are saying. >> yes, many legal experts are saying exactly it's wrong. >> tell me who they are, neera. >> locklear, "the washington post," the five legal scholars. >> based on what you heard there yesterday -- >> yes, based on what they heard on friday because as the president getting people out of the room. if what the fbi director said is true the language --
9:39 am
>> that's a chasm the size of the grand canyon. >> this whole thing tells you why it should be left in the hands of a special prosecutor. you are never going to get an honest assessment of what that testimony meant or did not mean. you can have lawyers. there's lots of impeachable statements by the director of the fbi in his testimony. if you talk about a legal standard which should be very, very high, certainly that testimony alone didn't meet it, and so best to leave this really, other than the court of public opinion. >> last week -- >> let me just say there are numerous legal scholars who say that what the president did rises to obstruction of justice. now, maybe you don't think it is and i'm glad we have a prosecutor that thankfully we have one that will make this determination but it is absolutely false to say nothing the president did, if director comey is right, and trump is wrong, which you know, he said he had tapes, we're going to --
9:40 am
we have a case of obstruction of justice. >> my friend that is where we are going unfortunately to have to leave it. chairman, neera, david, congressman, thank you so much to all of you on this topic. we'll have much more ahead after a break and when we come back, president trump and his team have a plan to move past the controversies and the plan that might be coming from a democrat on this. who is it? we'll have that next. dental professionals recommend using an electric toothbrush. for an exceptionally fresh feeling choose philips sonicare diamondclean. hear the difference versus oral b. in a recently published clinical study, philips sonicare diamondclean outperforms oral-b 7000, removing up to 82% more plaque and improving gum health up to 70% more. its sonic technology cleaning deep between teeth. from the most recommended sonic toothbrush brand by dental professionals. switch to philips sonicare today. philips sonicare. save when you buy now. philips sonicare. i am totally blind.
9:41 am
i lost my sight in afghanistan. if you're totally blind, you may also be struggling with non-24. calling 844-844-2424. or visit fromi wanted to seeved, this great country. my last wish is for you to do it for me, as a family. love, grandpa. ♪ let us be lovers, we'll marry our fortunes together ♪ older grandaughter: it'll be alright. i know. grandson: how did you meet grandpa? grandmother: actually on a blind date. [ laughter ] i wish he was on the trip with us. he's sitting right between the boys in the back of the car. [ laughter ] ♪ america ♪ all come to look for america ♪ all come to look for america
9:42 am
life's as big as you make it. the all-new 7-seater volkswagen atlas with america's best bumper-to-bumper limited warranty. i hafor my belly painking overand constipation.ucts i've had it up to here! it's been month after month of fiber. weeks taking probiotics! days and nights of laxatives, only to have my symptoms return. (vo) if you've had enough, tell your doctor what you've tried and how long you've been at it. linzess works differently from laxatives. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. it can help relieve your belly pain, and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements that are easier to pass. do not give linzess to children less than six, and it should not be given to children six to less than 18. it may harm them. don't take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe.
9:43 am
if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach-area pain, and swelling. talk to your doctor about managing your symptoms proactively with linzess. how if guests book direct ater, and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at
9:44 am
the president's new at this. he's new to government, and so
9:45 am
he probably wasn't steeped in the long running protocols that established the relationships between doj, fbi, and white houses. he's just new to this. >> house speaker paul ryan offering his take on accusations president trump asked former fbi director james comey to back off the flynn investigation. will that fly? the panel is back with me now. so this is the argument, david. president trump didn't know any different. he's new to this. does that fly? >> brianna, that's not the argument. that was one explanation from one person. >> we also heard it from senator collins, more than one republicans saying this. >> that's some people's explanation. i don't believe is an explanation from director comey when asked if he was so uncomfortable if he felt so awkward, if it was so inappropriate what the president did nine times, why didn't he address the president, say directly to president the, this is an inappropriate conversation we can't have. instead he scampered out into his suv and scribbled in his
9:46 am
moleskin, in case of emergency break glass and leak those to a columbia professor once he lost his job. >> the president's not some kid in some internship as president of the united states, that doesn't know what he's doing. he sold himself as i know how to get this job done, to the american people he knew exactly what he was doing. a, he asked his son-in-law to leave the room. he asked the attorney general to leave the room, and he asked the vice president to leave the room. that sounds like somebody who knew exactly what he was doing because he didn't want any witnesses when he went and spoke to the director, and we shouldn't blame -- >> have you never done something -- >> can i say something? i know a con artist when i see one. i was a con artist that day. >> i take umbrage. >> this is the president of the united states that went -- >> congressman -- >> -- to the fbi director. >> you've never done that with one of your constituents? >> and went to the fbi director and said to him, end an investigation, and then we're
9:47 am
supposed to believe he really doesn't know what he's doing. >> have you ever asked in a room with your constituents hang back, to your staff, i want to talk to you? a simple question. >> i don't know if that's apples to apples. >> can i say here you mentioned the leaking. first of all, plenty of -- just to answer your question, plenty of courts have said things like when you ask everyone to leave and hold someone back is actually a determination of motive, so just to answer that question, that for a court of law usually does show motive. number two, the whole issue of leaking, i look at what director comey did in this situation as whistle blowing. what happened with the president is on friday -- you can laugh, but what happened with the president is, on a friday, he said there were tapes. he said there were tapes of the conversations or there may be tapes of the conversation, and that is when director comey decided to say okay, i need to get an alternative set of reality here, which are the actual facts. >> on nine times -- >> but back to -- >> it's whistle blowing. >> is "i'm new here" an excuse,
9:48 am
a way to explain, oh, i didn't know what i was doing, it's not nefarious, when you're talking about several meetings and phone calls? >> no. it's not. and what the special prosecutor will have to do is take the totality of all of this, this one testimony, in my mind as a former fbi investigator does not rise to the level of obstruction of justice but that's why you have a special prosecutor. they'll go all the way around it. do the nine meetings give it weight? the worst, i think the worst problem this president has in this instance is the president himself. if he would stop talking about the small ball individual tweets, attacking director comey personally, i think we could get beyond this. i think the special investigator is going to have to have some room to investigate. >> listen, the president of the united states under oath said 100% he's ready and i think we can settle this. >> he said himself the reason why he said in his -- >> 100%.
9:49 am
>> -- in his interview with lester holt he gave the reason why he was fired. he said "i fired him because i had the russia investigation on my mind." so you're right. i say look at the totality and look at the president's own words in the lester holt interview and tells you why. >> david urban, final word to you here. >> let's go back to what director comey did. the assistant director of the fbi of the criminal division was on this show, not this show but on this network last week saying what the director did was inappropriate. after that first meeting -- don't roll your eyes, neera, go back and watch the tape. if he was a part of this investigation he should have recused himself. he was a material witness, a fact witness, part of it, he should have walked across the street and handed off, could have gone to the hill, congressman guttierez, senator feinstein. >> he gave his reason for this. he tried to do the investigation. >> under oath. under oath shall give his explanation of what happened. >> and my friends -- >> -- then the president would have impeded the investigation. >> court of public opinion and court of law are two very
9:50 am
different things. >> thank you so much, congressmen, david, neera tanden and chairman rogers. we appreciate it. after the break, joe biden echoes democratic anger with donald trump and turns to a republican? who does he want to run for office? some shocking new political bedfellows next. people confuse nice and kind but they're different. it's nice to remove artificial ingredients. kind never had to. we choose real ingredients like almonds, peanuts and a drizzle of dark chocolate. give kind a try. ♪ that when it comes to hospital romances,nows the more complicated, the better. i love you. but i love him. i love him, too. so do i. they also know you should get your annual check-up. schedule a checkup with your doctor to learn your four health numbers, and start taking control of your health today.
9:51 am
it could save your life. cigna. together, all the way. went to ancestry, i put in the names of my grandparents first. i got a leaf right away. a leaf is a hint that is connected to each person in your family tree. i learned that my ten times great grandmother is george washington's aunt. within a few days i went from knowing almost nothing to holy crow, i'm related to george washington. this is my cousin george. discover your story. start searching for free now at that one house where all the nkids hang out?s [team member] yes. [woman] we want to be that house. [team member] i love that. and now, with my credit options guide, we can help you find which type of credit might be right for you.
9:52 am
ready to get started? [woman] okay. [man] definitely.
9:53 am
in the past few days, mitt romney revealed hillary clinton encouraged to take the secretary of state job had president trump offered it. then vice president joe biden eyes a possible return to public life. cnn's dana bash finds out he may not be alone. >> i have just called president obama to congratulate him on his victory. >> reporter: mitt romney may have lost the presidency. >> i had a wonderful evening with president-elect trump. >> reporter: and his shot at being secretary of state. but he hasn't completely retired from politics, as he proved this weekend, hosting a bipartisan crowd of big names for his annual leadership summit. the meeting comes as romney's name is being floated as a
9:54 am
possible senator from utah, while his son josh is considering running for governor. >> mramerica is an amazing plac. >> reporter: his mother ann is certainly on board. >> go for it. it's worth making a difference. >> reporter: after all, politics runs deep in the romney blood. mitt romney's father george was also a governor who ran for president. >> we did it! >> reporter: yet right now, she may be the most powerful member of the romney clan. >> what do these pictures have in common? >> hmm, let's see. >> i don't know. there is a familiar theme here. i'm very happy to add a feminine touch to this wall. >> reporter: ranna romney is the first woman romney in decades.
9:55 am
>> i thought, i have to go into party politics so i can win and get my family members across the finish line. unfortunately this year we didn't have any romneys on the ballot. >> reporter: she led the rnc's effort to defend president trump against fired fbi director comey's allegations. >> donald trump is a phony, a fraud. his promises are as worthless as a degree from trump university. >> it's just a difference of opinion as to where the country needed to go. it didn't affect my relationship with my uncle mitt. we just saw this one a little differently. i think he's thrilled, as i am thrilled, that donald trump's the president. >> reporter: politics is the family business. even for the next generation of romneys. thank you so much for washing. "fareed zakaria gps" is next.
9:56 am
of course he was strong... ...intelligent. ...explosive. but the true secret to his perfection... was a heart, twice the size of an average horse. and sometimes i struggle to sleep at night,blind. and stay awake during the day. this is called non-24. learn more by calling 844-824-2424. or visit how if guests book direct ater, and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at
9:57 am
you doyou'll see whatet but in you're really made of.
9:58 am
after five hours of spinning and one unfortunate ride on the gravitron, your grandkids spot a 6 foot banana that you need to win. in that moment, you'll be happy you partnered with a humana care manager and got your health back on track. because that banana isn't coming home with you until that bell sings. great things are ahead of you when your health is ready for them. at humana, we can help you with a personalized plan for your health for years to come. go to great lengths frto find relief.ain finally there's drug-free aleve direct therapy®. a tens device with high intensity power that uses technology once only available in doctors' offices for deep penetrating relief at the source. aleve direct therapy.
9:59 am
10:00 am
this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. we'll begin today's show with the former fbi director's extraordinary testimony. >> lordy, i hope there are tapes. >> what to make of jim comey's tough words and where will they lead? >> the russians interfered in our election. >> i have top former intelligence officials and legal minds to discuss it all. >> then, the stunning results of the british election. a dramatic setback for the conservatives and prime minister may. how long will she be able to


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on