tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN June 19, 2017 7:00pm-8:01pm PDT
that's all the time we have for tonight. time to hand things over to don lemon. with the c "cnn tonight" starts right now. this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news right now, seems michael flynn forgot to mention another foreign trip on his security clearance form. another one. and this one doozy. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. want to know a lot more about flynn's 2015 trip to the middle east. their investigation could look at whether president trump crossed the line in his conversations with fired fbi director james comey. meanwhile, a bunker mentality spreading inside that place you're looking at right there, the white house. press briefings cut back, as rumors fly that sean spicer may
be leaving the podium. we'll discuss all of this. let's get straight to cnn's jim sciutto with more on our breaking news. jim, good evening to you. we have new reporting tonight on what must be a thorn in the president's side. former national security adviser michael flynn failing to disclose a middle east trip about a russia deal. what can you tell us? >> reporter: that's exactly right. this is a letter from the ranking members, ranking democrats on the house oversight committee and house foreign affairs committee to general flynn's lawyers as well as two of his business partners asking about a trip in the summer of 2015 to saudi arabia, to arrange, it appears, a nuclear deal between saudi arabia and russia to build nuclear power plants. undisclosed on general flynn's security clearance renewal form when he took a position in the trump white house. they're also asking about a trip later that year in october of 2015 that general flynn provided no details for including where he stayed there, who he traveled
with, and the purpose of the trip and in addition to that, the fact that on that security clearance form, general flynn did not list any meetings with foreign officials for the seven years prior to his application for the security clearance to enter the trump administration. all these things required by law to report on what's known as your sf-86, your application for security clearance form, they're asking for details. i contacted flynn's lawyer today. he would not comment on the letter, but he did confirm that they received the letter from house democrats. >> interesting. jims cnn is also learning the senate judiciary committee widening the scope of their investigation. they're now going to look at obstruction of justice allegations? >> reporter: that's right. a moment, it seems, of bipartisanship, or at least some bipartisanship. the ranking democrat on the judiciary committee, senator dianne feinstein, and the chairman, senator chuck grassley, agreeing on the outlines of their probe. big picture, they're going to focus on russian interference in the election, but they're also
going to look at the possibility of interference with the fbi investigation, not just by the trump administration, but by the obama administration. what's interesting about this is that you have the republican chairman of the judiciary committee, at least including in the scope of the investigation the possibility that donald trump interfered in the investigation, meetings with the fbi director james comey, what he asked him to do. it also could mean that it's the judiciary committee that ends up going down this path of obstruction of justice, if the senate intelligence committee, we've seen their hearings, we broadcasted them live here on cnn. they'll focus on russian interference, maybe the judiciary committee now takes the lead on the possibility of obstruction of justice, including by the president. >> jim sciutto, thank you so much. i appreciate it. i want to turn now to stonewalling in the white house briefing room. those rumors about the embattled press secretary sean spicer. cnn's jim acosta joining me now. and jim, some details of the
story you're about to report should have every american outraged tonight. but let's talk about the reporting about the future of press briefings with sean spicer. does he still have a job? >> reporter: well, i think he still has a job, don, i'm not sure about melissa mccarthy, she may have to seek out new impersonations to pick up. but what we understand from talking to our sources, don, white house press secretary sean spicer is being talked about in a different role -- for a different role inside the west wing. that role i'm told by sources would oversee the white house press secretary job and also the job of communications director. those are two very big jobs here at the white house. and so sean spicer may be overseeing that in a future role. now, we should point out that i talked to a different source over here earlier this evening who said some of this may not be completely set in stone, that the process seems a bit, quote, chaotic right now, and don, we should underniline, we've heard this about reince priebus, he was going to be on his way out,
and heard different incarnations of sean spicer leaving the scene in various stages of the administration and those things have not come to pass. what we do understand from talking to sources this evening, this discussion is happening, sean spicer may be leaving the podium. no timeline set, though. >> staff shakeup. all right. that happens. >> reporter: yeah. >> jim, this is 2017. the white house is refusing to let you ask questions on camera or audio today. what is going on over there? >> reporter: yeah. >> is it the russia investigation, they don't want to answer questions? what is happening? >> reporter: it sure seems like the russia investigation. i mean, let me just paint the picture for you, don. you've been here at the white house before. i know you've sat in the white house booth with us here at cnn. when you walk thu through that briefing room, when we have a press briefing at the white house, reporters are in different spots asking questions of sean spicer, that is almost exactly what occurred today in the white house briefing room. we had a briefing going on today inside the white house with the exception of cameras and audio.
so we essentially had the same thing that the press secretary does at any other time during a briefing except the white house said, well, you can't record what is said in the briefing on video or on audio. and what is shocking about this, not only is it the year 2017, but you have a lot of questions that need to be asked. like, is the president under investigation? he tweeted that he was under investigation. is he under investigation? what about these recordings over here that the president floated this prospect of having? the white house, sean spicer said earlier today, well, we might have an finance for that by the end of this week. by the way, they said that last week. and on and on. don, i think what they're trying to do here is perhaps give us the same evasive answers that we've grown accustom to receiving in the white house. they just don't want to have the -- they don't have the courage to see that on camera or hear it on the radio, or in audio fashion anymore. they just wan t to cover that u. i think that's what we saw
today. at the same sometime, we should point out sean spicer, even though this wasn't on camera today, is limiting the number of questions being asked. for example, today, i'm not making this up, a russian reporter asked a question at the press briefing today of sean spicer, but he would not call on cnn, yours tru s truly, sittinge press briefing room. that to me is sort of staggering. i talked to a friend of mine who works at fox news last week, whose name i will not mention on the air. he said during the obama administration he could only remember one time when the press secretary under barack obama would not call on fox news. it was because he left the press briefing early. this routinely happens to cnn, and it is part of an ongoing scaling back of press freedoms that we have inside the white house here. shutting off the cameras and the audio is just part of the deal these days. >> this is america, jim. >> reporter: yeah. we -- >> you don't shut off the -- and i'm going to bring the panel in in a second here. jim, here's why it's outrageous
if one sense, but can you imagine if the obama administration had done this. and other administrations previously. people would be calling, you know, for the president's head or for the press secretary -- it doesn't matter that it's cnn, if it happened to any other news organization, it would be outrageous that they're not calling -- if it happened to fox news, happened to msnbc, happened to abc, nbc, whatever, it's outrageous. or "the new york times" or whatever. but here's the thing. i don't think this white house understands that sean spicer actually works for the american people. he doesn't work for the president. >> reporter: he does. >> we pay his salary. and part of his job description is to give press briefings. and if he's not going to do that, is he going to give some of the money back that he's making from the -- off the backs of the american people? >> reporter: i couldn't agree more, don. and i think what this is going to boil down to, and this is something that mainstream news organizations are going to be reluctant to do, we're going to have to consider banding together and saying, you know what, we're not going to cover your gaggle l, we're not going
to cover your briefing if you're just going to have this press briefing going on in the briefing room without video or audio. that is just too strange and bizarre and out of the tradition of covering the white house and we're just not going to do it. the question becomes, and herein lies the rub, do these news organizations band together and do this? i'm not saying that they won't. it's a very difficult thing to pull us all together, you know. >> what happens -- >> reporter: a herd of cats. >> pen and paper, maybe they're going to hand out stone tablets and a big rock for you. it's absolutely ridiculous. jim, standby. either standby or leave us or join the panel. >> reporter: i got to go. >> you got to get off the lawn. thank you, sir, i appreciate it. i want to bring in the panel. mark preston is here. political analyst abby phillip. political commentator, ryan lizza. ryan, it's outrageous, no other way to put it. >> it's completely absurd. the press secretary's job as
marlon fitzwater, reagan's press secretary, famously said, not to be a mouthpiece to the president. he is to be a bridge between the preside press and the president, serving both the press, and therefore, the public, and the president. he's sort of dual-hatted is the way it's traditionally thought of. and we have not seen that from day one from this press secretary or from the whole communications operation at the white house. they see themselves either as simply a vessel to get out a message of the day, and, frankly, when they are answering questions, they're not doing so in a very forthcoming or truthful manner, which has been a problem for this white house much more than any previous white house in the modern era. and this is -- this is absurd. >> do they know? do you get the sense that they're kmucommunicate communic. the president, we have to know more from the president? does the president believe in climate change or global warming? well, i'll get an answer.
>> sean spicer doesn't have a good relationship with grup ddo trump, doesn't have a relationship he can walk in, get the answer and relay it to the press. he seems like someone who lives in fear of losing his spot because trump famously creates an environment where everyone is a little nervous about whether they're going to be fired at any given time. >> who would want to work for someone like that? why? >> i don't know. i mean, if you're a communications person in d.c. like in republican politics or democratic politics, the pinnacle is to be the press sec stair. sean spicer is the dog that caught the car. >> can you imagine, this is what happens. mark, i want to read you something. this is from maggie haberman. she said "trump is now trapped in a white-gilded cage of his own making desperate to defend himself and told he can't because he has gotten himself into legally dicey situation." is this why they're not having press briefings?
what do you make of this? >> yeah, no doubt. just the image of the gilded cage, this always strikes me, don, is donald trump could be looking out his window and watching jim acosta basically just tear him apart on his front lawn. which i always find very amazing and the fact that someday we're going to see donald trump come storming out that door and try to wring jim acosta's nexck, right? >> get off my lawn. >> get off my lawn, right. >> i'm keeping your baseball -- >> i'm takining your microphone and cameras with me. >> i'm more sympathetic to those who have is to try to carry the message out to the reporters every day on behalf of president trump. i don't think that anybody in that white house has a very good relationship with president trump other than his daughter and his son-in-law. i don't think that president trump turns to them and says, listen, i need you to go out and i want you to say this and this is the truth. i don't think that happens. we saw that occur just in the last 24 to 36 hours when jay
sucalow went out, his personal attorney, and tried to clear up something president trump did and couldn't do so because it wasn't cleanupable. it is what it is. >> i like that. not cleanupable. >> right. it just isn't. i mean, it is what it is. i hope my kids are not watching since it's not proper english. but the bot tom line, people ar put in positions now in the white house and perhaps they can't get out or don't feel like they should get out or feel like if they do get out, then perhaps that is going to create more chaos and what have you. >> they're adult the, mark. >> it's a terrible situation. >> mark, they are adults and chose to get themselves into this situation and here they are. and let's hope that they're proud of it. abby, the white house isn't answering questions. neither is the president. here's a photo op of the president with the president of panama. watch this. >> mr. president, are you under investigation by the special counsel? >> i would like to -- >> mr. president, are you --
>> i would like to thank president trump for -- >> so, abby, you're in the pressroom, too. do you get the sense that everything will just be left to twitter or the president's personal attorneys to spin? >> i think it's by necessity that that's where they are. the fact that it's being left to twitter is definitely not anybody's plan. that is the president really acting on reflex here. he's doing what his but tells him to do. when he's angry, he tweets and no one can tell him otherwise. at the white house at this point, his aides have gotten to the point, they realize they can't tell him to stop doing that now. he gets very defensive, upset when they tell him to stop tweeting. that's where we are today with the only source of information about his mindset, coming from him directly, which as reporters, that's actually kind of interesting. at least we know exactly how he feels and what he thinks is going on, but as far as his lawyers are concerned, his
lawyers are not actually answering substantive questions in a way that is enlightening, either. i mean, i think that one of the reasons that marc kasowitz has been pointed to as the person to answer russian inquiry questions is that he's not around every single day. he's not in the presses briefing room. reporters can't walk into his office and ask him things. so it makes it much harder for them to -- it makes it much harder for reporters to get real answers from this white house or from the president's aides about what is going on. just one quick note about sean spicer, this idea that the white house is pulling back from the press briefing is coming directly from the president, himself. he believes that those briefings are not useful to him. they're not advancing his message. and he also -- >> it has nothing to do with him. >> yeah. that is how he feels about it. >> it's the american people and here's what -- here's what i would ask, if it is true what you're saying, here's what -- if you're a trump supporter and the president is saying this, do
au you want a president who is unchallenged that only delivers the message that he want? that is not the american way. presidents, anyone in authority, should be challenged, held to account, by the american people, the people who put them in office. that's what the media does whether he likes it or not. it's not about the president. it's about the people who actually pay the president's salary. >> right. the channel here is the siege mentality isn't just trump. it's -- it extends to all of his supporters, too. his supporters believe that the press briefing has become a medium by which the media persecutes the president and so they view it -- >> get better press people. >> that's the challenge here. >> then tell the truth at the podium. and then it won't become a dog and pony show. tell the truth. get better people to represent you. get people who will challenge you. get people who aren't afraid to tell you the truth. who will stand up there and say, look, this is the truth. get people -- stop tweeting so that people don't have to defend you when what you write is indefensible. but go on, ryan.
i know you want to jump in. >> i was going to say this is also happening at a time when trump, himself, has retreated from the media. right? he's not doing as many press conferences, or press availabilities. he's very rarely taking questions recently. he has, you know, as we showed with maggie haberman's tweet, he's in this sort of bunker mentality. >> do you remember how much guff the obama administration got when he didn't hold press conferences for a while? >> oh, yeah, there was like a clock at the rnc. >> can you imagine if the obama administration had done this? i'm just saying. >> no, absolutely. >> the one thing -- look, trump tweeted the other day the media wants him to get rid of twitter an we're try to get him to stop using social media. that is not the case at all. >> what would we talk about? >> seriously, the one unfiltered way we have access to trump is through twitter. >> social media. >> his lawyers and white house aides want him to stop tweeting. >> old these thoughts. we're going to talk about this and also talk about that
expensive congressional race down in georgia. the most expensive in history. and both sides are really counting on it. we'll be right back. [vo] what made secretariat the greatest racehorse who ever lived? of course he was strong... ...intelligent. ...explosive. but the true secret to his perfection... was a heart, twice the size of an average horse. finding the best hotel price is now a safe bet. because tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites - so you save up to 30% on the hotel you want. lock it in. tripadvisor.
♪ gave us the power to turn this enemy into an ally? microsoft and its partners are using smart traps to capture mosquitoes and sequence their dna to fight disease. there are over 100 million pieces of dna in every sample. with the microsoft cloud, we can analyze the data faster than ever before. if we can detect new viruses before they spread, we may someday prevent outbreaks before they begin. so, your new prescription does have oh, like what?ects. ♪ you're gonna have dizziness, nausea, and sweaty eyelids. ♪ ♪ and in certain cases chronic flatulence. ♪ no ♪ sooooo gassy girl. so gassy. if you're boyz ii men, you make anything sound good. it's what you do.
if you want to save 15% percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. next! ♪ next! a cockroach can survive submergede guy. underwater for 30 minutes. wow. yeah, wow. not getting in today. not on my watch. pests never stop trying to get in. we never stop working to keep them out. terminix. defenders of home. back now with my panel. we're going to talk about the 6th congressional district down in georgia. let's get back -- mark, any final words on the press briefings? you know -- >> look, i mean, i think the bottom line is is we're all in agreement that the fact of the matter is whether you're the president or you're a congressman or you're an aide that works in the administration or you work on capitol hill, you
work for the american people. there's no question about that. >> and i can hear people saying when i said the whole salary thing, thing, he doesn't need -- it doesn't matter. he works for the american people. we're still paying it. it coming out of our tax dollars. most of us would want the president and administration to hold press briefings to ask questions so we know exactly what's going on. this is america. >> i do think it's worth saying it, the buck stops here, the buck stops with the president. as much as we have anger directed at those who work for him and oftentimes it is legitimate, the bottom line is, it's the president's fault that we've got into this situation. everything as abby said is being directed by him. >> abby, let's talk about the high-stakes election that's happening in georgia's 6th congressional district. the most expensive house race ever. things are getting really ugly. democrat is jon ossoff versus republican karen handel. what are you expecting when the
polls open in the morning? >> well, it seems pretty clear we're in for a really, really tight race. i mean, you know, it's a congressional election, it's an off year, it's a special election. so, the chances that we will be looking at razor-thin margins i think given what the polls have looked like are pretty darn high. and not to mention the fact that what i think has really been surprising and fascinating about this election is in the last 48 to 72 hours, the degree to which outside groups have been pouring money in with ads. some very dubious ads. >> it's gotten dirty, right? >> yeah. it's been very interesting how these ads have really took a really -- turn to the left. some innuendo about the attack on republican congressmen last week suggesting that jon ossoff is sort of in line with the man who -- >> that in some way he's responsible for that. >> yeah. >> let's play it then we'll talk about it.
here's one of the ads. . >> now the unhinged left is endorsing and applauding shooting republicans. when will it stop? it won't if jon ossoff wins on tuesday. >> that's one of them. what do you think of that? >> i think it's just really remarkable. i mean, i think that -- given the fact that karen handel, the republican in that race, actually had to come out and condemn that ad kind of tells you that it's not really the -- there's no real gray area here in terms of how people -- how appropriate people think that is. it shows you the stakes are really high right now and they're so high that there are some outside groups who are willing to put it all on the line in order to sway a few voters in a really tight race. the republicans absolutely need to win. >> ryan, that ad is disgusting. >> it's disgusting. absolutely deplorable. it's one of the worst ads i've seen in politics. it reminds me of an ad years ago in georgia that tied the democratic candidate to osama bin laden. that shocked a lot of people.
a bit of a history of this in the dirty -- >> how much do you think it will have an impact? >> sometimes these things can backfire. this is like this nerdy centrist jon ossoff who is not running a particularly left-wing campaign and to tie him to political violence, i mean, it's -- it's disgusting, but, you know what, these kind of negative ads like that, they don't use them -- they use them for a reason because often they work. >> it's a politics is dirty business. so, listen, there's also this radio ad that put -- put out by a pro-trump group. it used former president barack obama's voice out of context. listen to this. >> police brutality rampant. when the so-called black committeemen came around election time, we'd all line up and vote the straight democratic ticket. sell our souls for a christmas turkey. >> let's not sell out for another christmas turkey. >> obama's spokesman said this is a fraudulent use of his voice. he said it is shameful, by the
way. and by the way, what the ad doesn't say is that the audio is actually president obama reading a passage from his book, "dreams of my father." he's actually quoting someone else. >> playing a character. >> he's -- >> right. >> what the hell is happening here? mark? >> well, i mean, look, we shouldn't be surprised that any of this is happening. politics has always been dirty. it's now just becoming more pronounced. i mean, we see it on social media. if you were to go back and look at history and look at dirty play in politics, it was always done. it was just done at a different level. we're now just seeing it exposed, quite frankly, in kind of being thrown out there. oftentimes, though, these ads that we're seeing like that television ad, i'm sure that this radio ad, there's not a whole lot of money behind them. might run a couple times and most people will never see the ad except the media, us, who then look at the ad and say, i can't believe that this is happening. it actually gets a lot more -- >> the people who hear it, though, ryan -- >> no doubt, it's gross. >> this is the information, tech
age, you're supposed -- people are supposed to be informed. >> no, you can do -- what mark is saying, with a little bit of money, you can blow something up because of social media and the way, the saturation coverage of these things. >> i got to run. thank you, mark, thank you, ryan, thank you, abby. appreciate it. more breaking news. president trump speaking out on the death of otto warmbier, the american college student who spent 17 brutal months in prison in north korea. and was just released last week. >> o >> otto warmbier just passed away. he spent a year and a half in north korea. a lot of bad things happened. at least we got him home to be with his parents where they were so home to see him even though he was in very tough condition, p but he just passed away a little while ago. that's a brutal regime, and we'll be able to handle it.
>> the 22-year-old college student's alleged crime, stealing a political poster. he tearfully begged for forgiveness but was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor. doctors say otto warmbier suffered severe brain damage while in detention. he died this afternoon in cincinnati surrounded by his family. senator john mccain issuing his angry statement tonight. "let us state the facts plainly, otto warmbier, an american citizen, was murdered by the kim jong-un regime." we'll be right back.
dearthere's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced. our senses awake. our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say...if you love something set it free. see you around, giulia lwho's the lucky lady? i'm going to the bank, to discuss a mortgage. ugh, see, you need a loan, you put on a suit, you go crawling to the bank. this is how i dress to get a mortgage. i just go to lendingtree. i calculate how much home i can afford. i get multiple offers to compare side by side. and the best part is... the banks come crawling to me. everything you need to get a better mortgage. clothing optional. lendingtree, when banks compete, you win.
a source is telling cnn the west wing staff has tried to convince president trump to stop tweeting about the russia investigation. good luck. you'll see how well that's going, right? we already do. so here to discuss, cnn political commentator, charles blow. cnn senior economics analyst, steven moore. former seen your economic adviser to the trump campaign. good evening to both of you, gentlemen. i saw both of you smile when i said "good luck with that" because he's the truth, he loves his twitter. charles, you have a new piece
out in "the new york times," i want to talk about entitled kt trump is girding for a fight." you say "the investigation is in its early stages but trump has no plans to wait for it to either condemn or clear him. he's taking a much more aggressive approach, one that in the end may do more harm than good. he's attempting to defame, discredit and delegitimize." why do you think the president is doing what you write? >> i think it's just part of who he is. i mean, he -- this is how he has operated in new york city forever. is he's a very -- he has been party, according to "usa today," to over -- >> 3,500. >> 3,300 lawsuits. he understands that the legal system can bend under the weight of a lot of pressure and a lot of money. he constantly fights these cases. >> he's only lost, since you brought it up, "usa today" says
he's involved in 3,500 legal matters. only lost 38. fighting worked for him in the past. >> exactly. part of the frustration for him is that this is the big league. it doesn't work the same way as when you're fighting in a local court about a zoning rule, about some tenant who won't move -- >> you have way more money to weight them out. >> also, he literally has as much money as he wants. i mean, the special counsel can hire as many lawyers as he likes, he can hire whichever lawyers he likes. the courts on that level are not necessarily, you know, kind of worried about -- >> i understand. the point is, my point is, i think you'll agree, he can't weight people out with money, right? until they run out of money and withdrew have billio you have billions and you can fight. >> you're seeing someone who's acting out of a loss of control and realize he can't control it. >> steven, do you think it's distracting the comments he's making on this investigation, that it's taking away from his agenda? >> well, i sure am concerned that the whole russia investigation and the comey testimony and so on has put the
republican economic agenda on hold. and i think that's problematic. i think it's hurting the stock market. i think it's, you know, i talked to ceos, don, and i talked to investors who say we're getting nervous about whether the republicans are going to be able to do the things they said they were going to do, because let's face it, the last four to six weeks have really been a total distraction from trump's economic agenda. you know, he got elected because he said he was going to create jobs and grow the economy. there hasn't been a lot of movement on the tax bill or the health care bill for that matter. >> do you think he bears any responsibility for it? a lot of it was his own creation. >> trump made some bad unforced errors. i still think they're going to get the health care bill done and the tax bill is going to get done this year but there's no question about it, remember, about four, five weeks ago he introduced his tax plan with his treasury secretary and head of national economic council then
it's kind of just laid there and there is a lot of concern right now that -- i think, by the way, don, the reason you're seeing a star stock market that's very jitt y jittery, what we saw at the -- >> stephen, with all due respect, i don't mean to cut you off, but i speak to trump supporters as well and they say the same thing, when is it going to happen? especially small businessowners. we wanted some tax cuts. all the incentives. none of that is happening. since you brought it up, let's talk more about health care. as a matter of fact, let me show you the senate floor. i think new jersey senator cory booker speaking tonight, specifically this is about health care. democrats are trying to bring the senate to a halt with a night full of speeches. they're protesting the way republicans -- keeping many members, they say, in the dark with this health care bill and could come to the floor as early as next week. what are republicans, stephen, gaining from keeping this so secretive? why not debate this out in the
open for everyone to hear? >> i'm all for transparency and openness. i think republicans, look, they can do their behind-the-door deliberations, but when this plan comes out, don, they better give the american people and members of congress plenty of time to go through this compromise that they come up with. i'm very much opposed to -- >> in they don't do that, what do you think will happen? you say they better, or what? >> i think they'll look hypocritical. remember, a lot of republicans made fun of nancy pelosi, remember, don, when she said, we'll read the bill after we pass it. republicans i think are going to lock pretty shameful if they do the same thing. i'm not saying they're going to do that, bullt i think there's mood among republicans, let's get this done as quickly as possible so people can't see the bill. that's a dumb strategy. you should be broad of it. >> we have a digital time machine. let's take you back to 2009, 2010. this is what democrthey said. watch this. >> democrats on capitol hill are
working behind the scenes at a plan aimed at jamming this massive health care spending bill through congress against the clear wishes of an unsuspecting public. >> look at how this bill was written. can you say it was done openly? >> no! >> with tran paresparency and accountabili accountability? >> no! >> without backroom deals, behind closed doors, hidden from the people? hell, no, you can't. >> we want to do it right. if you rush this thing through before anybody even thoughs what it is, that's not good democracy, that's not doing our work for our constituents. >> charles, i'm not saying, i'm just saying. >> i mean, what do you even say to that? >> i said, i'm not saying, but i'm just saying. >> it's actually kind of sad and pathetic, right, because it -- i mean, on one level, it is about washington and just the hypocrisy of washington politicians. on another level, it's specific to these particular politicians
and whether or not they -- the principles that they were saying they stood for, you know, including whether or not this is even democratic. and they're doing the exact same thing. i mean, it's -- and if you follow their kind of thinking, they want to pass it by july 4th, there's no way to -- >> it's faster because the aca took a while. they did pass it. it's sort of under the cover of darkness, but it took them a while to get to that point. >> absolutely. absolutely. and, i mean, it will be smaller. >> right. >> because you're taking a sledgehammer to something is not the same as creating it. >> right. >> that ought to push it out even kind of faster because it's a smaller bill. >> yeah. and you mean into the public, so the public can have some say in it. thank you, gentlemen. i appreciate it. when we come back, why the president's lawyer insists he isn't under investigation. despite the president tweeting that he is under investigation. whoooo. looking for a hotel that fits... ...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over 200 sites to find you the hotel you want at the lowest price.
if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you,
arabia and russia's nuclear power agency. let's discuss now, john q. barrett is here, who was associate counsel for the iran-contra investigation. matthew whittaker. and cnn contributor, john dean. former nixon white house counsel and author of ""conservatives without conscience." i love having you on together or individually. john barrett, i'm going to start with you. your reaction to this. flynn may have misled officials on his security clearance form about two middle east trips during the presidential campaign. one of hitch involved russia and that $100 billion nuclear deal i talked about earlier. i just mentioned. what do you think? >> well, forms are hard to fill out. it's laborious. but they're very high stakes and they're very important. and security clearance personnel position clearance form is something that someone like general flynn knows to take seriously. it's a problem. >> okay. so here's the thing.
everyone i know -- listen, i don't know, you know -- i have a bunch of friends who are in the military and they say that they -- john and matthew and john dean, they say that they take the sf-86 very seriously as members of the military because they can be prosecuted if they get it wrong. so, as a general, someone who is a general in the armed services, would general flynn not take it as seriously as the rank and file members who come in, you know, as civilians then come in? >> i think he would take it more seriously and it's something he clearly had experience with. this is something that you don't want to read into the motives, but if he doesn't disclose things, you wonder if maybe he didn't want people to know about it. and that -- that's -- as a former prosecutor, you always look for not only what the evidence shows, but what also didn't they do that they should have done. >> okay. so one here there.
you could say, that was complete oversight on my part, but not when it starts to be a pattern. right? congressional investigators say they have no record of flynn ever identifying a single foreign government official he had contact with in seven years prior to submitting his application. john dean, that's a problem. >> it is a problem. also, that fs-86 form has a very conspicuous statement at the beginning and at the end that misstatements on it are subject to criminal prosecution under 18 us-c-1001 which is a tough statute which prosecutors know a lot about. >> do you think he's cooperating -- some have said they believe he's cooperating with the fbi, with the investigation, do you believe that? >> i don't yet. i think we'd have more evidence of it. you know, if anybody has got good reason to help out and become a witness rather than a defendant and get a good play,
it would be him because the offenses are certainly stacking up. this latest is just so conspicuous that one wonders what he had in his mind when he was filling those forms out. >> john -- john barrett, also cnn is learning tonight the senate judiciary committee is now going to look at obstruction of justice allegations. do you think that's the right move? >> it's within their oversight jurisdiction, obviously, and the sort of watergate precedent, john dean, forgive me, is special prosecutor and the senate committee investigation proceeding on parallel tracks. and, you know, there's serious evidence that indicates possible obstruction. it's, i think, obvious that mueller is investigating it for law enforcement purposes and it makes sense that the senate and, indeed, whereas the house should dig into it for congressional purposes. >> is that the right move, do you believe, matthew? >> this is where i have to disagree with the professor. as i said the other night, the only difference between this
current investigation and watergate is watergate actually had evidence of real crimes being committed. right now we have two acts by a president that appear to be constitutionally lawful and without more, for example, bribery, or some other illegal act, i just don't see as we sit here today any evidence of crimes being committed. >> yeah. so, the president says he's under investigation, but his lawyers says he's not under investigation. the president insists he's under investigation, but his lawyer insists he's not under investigation. his lawyer says he is under investigation. i'm not making this up. after the break. . scheduling time to go to the bank to get a mortgage. ugh, you're using a vacation day to go to the bank? i know, right? just go to lendingtree dot com. get up to five loan offers to compare side by side for free. wow, that's great. wait, how did you get in my kitchen? oh, i followed a raccoon in through your doggie door. [gasps] get a better mortgage on your schedule. not the bank's. lendingtree. when banks compete, you win. just think of 'em as a big cat. with rabies.
all right. we're back now with my panel. so let's talk about the president, his lawyer says he's not under -- first, the president tweeted that he was under investigation. and then his lawyer went on television yesterday and today and said a whole bunch of stuff that contradicted the president and himself, the lawyer himself. take a look. >> so the president said, i am under investigation even though he isn't under investigation? >> that response on social media was in response to "the washington post" piece. it's that simple. the president is not under investigation. >> first of all, you've now said
that he is being investigated after saying that -- >> no, he's not being investigated. >> you just said that he's being investigated. >> no, chris, i said -- let me be crystal clear. so you completely understand. we have not received nor are we aware of any investigation of the president of the united states. >> sir, you just said two times that he's being investigated. >> no. the context of the tweet, i just gave you the legal theory, chris. >> why don't you pick up the phone and get the answer and then you could actually say no, i asked mueller and we're not. why don't you pick up the phone? >> look, you're asking me to pick up a phone on an investigation we don't know exists. >> there's not an investigation. >> you don't know whether there's -- oh, boy, this is weird. >> it says right here on this dossier the president, anytime you say let me be crystal clear. what does that mean? >> let me be crystal clear because i think what jay -- i'm going to do some interpretation of what jay is saying.
i think what he's saying is that the president was responding only to the "washington post" article, right? and three months ago, jim comey said that the president was not under investigation. >> three months ago. >> whenever the last time that jim comey and the president spoke about it. and he said that he wasn't under investigation. that's the last time they've heard anything from the fbi. they're assuming they're not under investigation. that's the interpretation. >> do you believe that? as a former u.s. -- does someone have to notify you? that's what chris cuomo was trying to get at. no one has to notify you you're under investigation. i think it's obvious that he is -- doesn't mean he's guilty. >> right. >> isn't it obvious. >> he is under investigation. lots of people are under investigation. we each might be under investigation. most subjects don't know that. you're not entitled to an answer till the government wants to reach out and tell you your status as part of negotiating with you or calling you to a grand jury or interviewing you. >> before i get to john dean, quickly, when actors say what's
my motivation, why? >> i've been thinking why jay sec cue lo would go on the circuit and say this is the message that i'm trying to drive. and i think really what they're trying to do is frying to say that the president isn't under investigation as far as they know. that's what they're trying to say. >> don't they drive home the message that the president is under investigation just by the -- >> it's called hanging a lantern on it. >> exactly. john dean, you've been in the white house before. you've been around. when you don't want something to be out there in the ethos, you don't give it oxygen. you shut up about it, don't respond to it. >> that's the general rule. we've got a situation here, don, where the justice department really doesn't have the power to indict a sitting president. so they might be driving the point home right now and starting to lay the base for it that they don't think the special counsel should be even snooping around these areas if they are beginning to target a
president. because they don't have that authority. that's been the ruling since the '70s and now it was renewed in the towels and it's been the existing policy of the justice department. so that might be what the counsel is doing here. >> but even if that is so, which it is as you say they don't have the power to do it, does that mean people still shouldn't get to the investigative agencies, shouldn't get to the truth here? >> no, what will happen is, you know, a president can be a collateral subject of the investigation. he certainly is not free-throw from investigation from his days as a candidate. and that's one of the issues that's being looked at. was there collusion? we're focusing a lot on obstruction and not on the underlying problem that started all this is whether or not the trump campaign colluded with russians in the hacking. > i've got to go. remember richard nixon was an unindict asked co-conspirator. >> he was. and they did that largely
forestory reasons because they wanted to get his tapes into the trial, the cover-up trial which is a conspiracy case. >> thank you, gentlemen. i appreciate it. when we come back, democrats say michael flynn misled officials about yet another foreign trip. and guess what, it could link him to russia. plus, we're just hours away from the polls opening in georgia's special congressional election a lot of people say is a referendum on president trump. dynamic performance, so you can own the road. track-tuned handling, so you can conquer corners. aggressive-styling, so you can break away from everyone else. experience the exhilaration of the bold lexus is. experience amazing.
this is cnn breaking news. breaking news. another overseas trip that michael flynn never quite got around to disclosing. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. house democrats depending more information about a trip flynn made in 2015, one that, surprise, might have something to do with rhymes with mussia. russia. more on that in just a minute. plus, voters getting set to go to the polls in the most expensive congressional election ever. why a lot of people are saying the special election in georgia is really a referendum on president trump. we'll have first word on tomorrow's headlines for you on that. and inside the white house bunker. a frustrated agitated president worried, staffers are worried there. no wonder some republicans are afraid to take jobs in the trump administration. let's get right