tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN June 27, 2017 3:00pm-4:01pm PDT
bashar al-assad may be preparing to launch another chemical attack, warning him to stand down or pay a heavy price. how far is mr. trump willing to go to make good on his threat? podesta testifies, hillary clinton's former campaign manager facing new questions about his hacked e-mails and the broader russia investigation. did house intelligence committee leaders seek new information, distraction? and wave of counterattacks, hackers striking across europe crippling governments, banks and businesses on a huge scale and demanding ransoms. tonight the department of homeland security is monitoring whether the crisis is spreading here. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer and you're in "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news tonight, republican senators face to face with president trump after a new
blow to their party's promise to repeal and replace obamacare. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell forced to delay a vote on the gop health care bill until after the july 4th recess. mcconnell failing to secure enough republican support to pass the legislation. senate republicans leaving the white house a while ago as the president ratchet s up the pressure to find a compromise. the president insisting they are getting very close, but senator susan collins and others are questioning whether tinkering with the bill will make a difference. the gop revolt intensifying after a nonpartisan report found that 22 million americans would lose insurance under the senate plan. also tonight, the united states is monitoring the situation in syria after bashar al-assad may be launching a new chemical attack. the white house putting assad on notice he will pay a heavy price
if he massacres his own people again. the president ordered a missile strike on syria in april as punishment for a deadly chemical attack on civilians including children. tonight no specifics from the white house on how the president would respond if assad defies his warning. this hour, i'll talk about all those stories and more with senator angus king. he's an independent on the armed services and intelligence committees. our correspondents and specialists are standing by. first let's go to the white house for more on the president's meeting with republican senators that just wrapped up. our senior white house correspondent jeff zeleny is standing by. jeff, the republican senators just left the white house. give us the latest. what came out of that meeting? >> reporter: wolf, the republican senators just left as you said and they talked about an hour and 15 minutes or so inside the east room of the white house. and i'm told that it was more of a listening session. the president talked at the very beginning of the meeting, but then sat and listened to so many of the concerns from the rank and file republican senators.
but after the meeting senator mitch mcconnell he said that no is not an answer. they must reach a consensus. >> we made good progress. the president got an opportunity to hear from the various members who have concerns about market reforms and medicaid, the future of medicaid, medicaid expansion. so, i think the meeting was very helpful. the one thing i would say is that i think everybody around the table is interested in getting the yes, interested in getting an outcome because we know the status quo is simply unacceptable, unsustainable and no action is just not an option. >> reporter: so, there definitely is a consensus to get something done, wolf, but it is unclear if any progress was made on exactly what that might be. but the seating chart at this meeting so interesting and not by accident. senator susan collins of maine senator lisa murkowski of
alaska, two of the most skeptical republicans, if you will, sitting on either side of the president there in the east room. they were expressing their concerns. wolf, i am told that senator john mccain also raised some deep concerns about the secrecy of this entire bill. so, it was a bit of a venting session, a bit of a listening session. at the end of the day there, though, senator mcconnell was sugar coating it a bit in the sense that everything's okay with this bill. wolf, that is not necessarily the sense here. there is a sigh of relief among republicans that they don't have to vote this week, but unclear when they come back from that recess if there will be a consensus, wolf. >> what was the president's message to these republican senators, jeff? >> reporter: wolf, the president's message basically was kwone of a cheerleader, onef a unifire, a party leader. he didn't offer any prescriptive solutions. he's not in the weeds of the bill that isn't necessarily his role. but he was urging them to find agreement among themselves. >> to the country, we have to
have health care and it can't be obamacare, which is melting down. the other side is saying all sorts of things before they even knew what the bill would be. great if we get it done, and if we don't get it done it's just going to be something that we're not going to like and that's okay and i understand that very well. but i think we have a chance to do something very, very important for the public, very, very important for the people of our country that we love. >> reporter: and the reality here there is that he was talking several times about how obamacare, in his words, has melted down. but, wolf, the president and certainly people here at the white house understand that they now own this. they now have the burden of trying to fix this. the question will be will he become more involved in this day to day. senator mcconnell and other republican leaders don't necessarily want the president to be having these individual conversations. it's back to the drawing board in some degree. the republican senators have
left the white house, wolf. >> all right, jeff, thank you. jeff zeleny at the white house. let's go to capitol hill right now where congressional correspondent phil mattingly is on the scene for us. so, phil, the majority leader mitch mcconnell said senate republicans made good progress in their meeting with the president, but how much trouble is this bill really in? >> reporter: it's in a lot of trouble, wolf. that's just to put it bluntly. there are major concerns, idea logical divides in the 52 member conference mitch mcconnell leads. as jeff noted it's in the building behind me, not in the white house, where those decisions and hopefully for senators' sake, those compromises can finally be made. tonight republican leaders coming up short on health care. >> legislation of this complexity almost always takes longer than anybody else would hope. but we're going to press on. >> reporter: at least for now. majority leader mitch mcconnell holding his pledge to vote this
week. the reality sinking in the votes simply were not there. gop sources telling cnn the goal will be to finalize the long out of reach compromise this week, get a new cbo score, and then vote after the july 4th congressional recess. >> i had hoped, as you know, that we could have gotten to the floor this week. but we're not quite there. but i think we've got a really good chance of getting there. it will take us "a little bit longer." >> reporter: but the decision coming late, even after senate's number 2 john cornyn told cnn earlier today, he wanted a vote this week. >> i think we should vote. we've been debating this issue for seven years and i think it's time for us to vote. >> reporter: leadership under pressure after five gop senators came out in opposition of even taking up the health care proposal and others clearly uncomfortable with the bill's direction. >> i'm concerned about the bill in the form it is now. >> reporter: this, a day after the blow of a nonpartisan cbo score that showed 22 million
fewer americans would have insurance by 2026 under their proposal. one that also showed that while average premiums would drop by an estimated 30% by 2020, less wealthy americans would take a severe hit. >> it's difficult for me to see how any tinkering is going to satisfy my fundamental and deep concerns about the impact of the bill. >> reporter: republican senators, including susan collins, taking a bus to the white house to meet with the president and discuss a path forward. >> we are getting very close, but for the country we have to have health care, and it can't be obamacare which is melting down. >> reporter: that path, according to senior senate aides, not going to be easy. but it will be to complete things as quickly as possible. >> i believe we can get the yes. i believe we will get to yes. it's going to take more discussions. and the most critical question is how do we lower premiums.
>> reporter: democrats saying today's delay is progress and that americans are listening to their arguments against the bill. >> no matter what tweaks they may add in the next week and a half, no matter how the bill changes around the edges, it is fundamentally flawed at the center. the ultimate reason this bill failed is because the american people just didn't like it. >> reporter: and, wolf, just to give you a sense of how bad off senate republicans were, just an hour after senator mcconnell announced in that closed door meeting they would be postponing the vote, three new republican senators came out with their opposition of the plan. again, this underscoring the reality here. while senator mcconnell is very well aware of what all the members of his conference need to get to yes, his ability to bridge that gap, bridge the divide between the idea logical poles inside his conference, it is an open question whether he can do that. they're going to try and work quickly, try and hammer out details by the end of this week. as it currently stands as one
senate gop aide told me, there's a lot of work left to do. >> phil mattingly up on capitol hill, thanks very much. joining us now senator angus king ever maine. he's an independent of the intelligence and armed services committees. we've got lots to discuss. senator, thanks for joining us. >> thank you, would have. >> we just heard from the senate majority republican leader mitch mcconnell. when he emerged from the white house, he was passionate at the very end of the q. and a. with reporters. what happens if the republicans fail to pass legislation, can you then go to the democrats and work on a compromise to fix obamacare, to improve it? he basically said no, he said because the democrats, they don't want any reforms of the market. they don't want any reforms of medicaid. what's the point? now, you're an independent. you caucus with the democrats. what's your response to the majority leader there? there's really no need or no opportunity to come up with a compromise with democrats? >> well, with the majority leader, i just don't think
that's true. i've been meeting with a group of members of the democratic caucus for about three years trying to develop some fixes for obamacare. nobody argues that the aca is a perfect law and it can be -- it certainly can be improved. we've got to deal with things like premiums and deductibles and how the whole system works and how it works with small businesses. so, there are lots of things that we can do. i have a radical suggestion for the majority leader. submit the bill to the health education labor and pensions committee, have hearings, have a mark-up, involve experts, let's talk about it and understand it. the process for this bill was horrible where it was all done behind closed doors, completely in secret. and it's not surprising that if you have a horrible process, you're going to have a horrible bill and that's what happened. let's just take a deep breath and go back to the way the congress is supposed to work, with input from all over the country and maybe we can come up with a good solution. i think we can. >> if the president, president
trump invited you to the white house, senator, to discuss health care solutions, would you accept that invitation? >> it would -- i think the precondition would be that we stop talking about repealing and severely crippling medicaid if we're talking about improving the affordable care act. and if the president really -- somebody asked me the other day, what's your position. i said it's just like the president. i want everybody to have health care. i want reasonable premiums and deductibles and i want no preexisting conditions. that's what he keeps saying, but these bills, the one that passed the house and the one that's pending in the senate, don't do any of those things. so, if he really wants to talk about solving this problem, i think people will be willing to talk, but not with the sort of damacles holding over our head with these draconian drastic cuts to medicaid. this bill would take about a trillion dollars over ten years out of the medical budgets of our country, and there's no way you can do that without harming people. >> your colleague from maine,
republican senator susan collins said she's not sure from her, quote, tinkering, in her words, can address her fundamental concerns about the bill. are there changes that the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell could propose, do you believe, that will change the calculation for senator collins and others who are still on the fence? >> i don't think so because the fundamental thrust of the bill is a huge tax cult for tt for te who least need t a huge cut in medicaid and support premiums in the affordable care act. which by the way disproportionately hurt seniors. i think senator collins is looking at largely the way i do, it's just a practical thing. how will this affect maine and the answer is it's going to knock thousands of people out of insurance. it's going to hurt seniors, disabled people, children in maine. it's a practical effect not to mention, wolf, one of the things that's not really being discussed very much is the effect on rural hospitals. i've had round tables around
maine and we're talking about -- well, 8 in our 16 counties, the hospital is the largest employer and they're all telling me they would at least have to downsize, if not close. and that would be an economic disaster on top of the human disaster that this bill or something largely like it, would impose on maine people. so, if you want to stop talking about dismantling medicaid, which is a life line for millions of americans, and instead let's try to talk about what we can repair and make the affordable care act work better, then, you know, i'm all ears, as the man says. but if we're talking about these wrecking ball approaches, you know, that's not very interesting. >> yesterday the president threatened to let obamacare, in his words, clash crash and burn in a statement he released on twitter yesterday. if you and your colleagues don't work to improve obamacare where it needs that improvement, how concerned are you that the
president and the republicans could, in effect, help sab toj -- sabotage parts of obamacare that are working? as you know democrats are deeply worried about that. >> you're absolutely right. the word sabotage is an appropriate one. the administration is not doing a thing to help the system to stabilize and work. it's important, wolf, that in the nonpartisan congressional budget office analysis, both of the house bill and the senate bill, they specifically said the affordable care act system can and will be stable. and the actions that the administration has taken thus far, not enforcing, not informing, not encouraging people to sign up, has in effect made it a self-fulfilling prophecy. so, the idea -- this idea i keep hearing it's going to implode and go out of business and go under just isn't true. and certainly if the
administration would try to do what the president said a few minutes ago, he wants health care for people, this is the system we have now. if you want to change it, fine, but let's make it work as best we can until we can make those changes. >> senator, there's more we need to discuss, including the latest threat from the president to bashar al-assad's regime in syria. a new red line emerging on the use of chemical weapons. we'll have that and more right after this. , you're terrible with names. okay, this is the boss. you got this. anna!...yes! new clients? we've been there. and with breakfast on the run, we'll be there for you. book direct for a guaranteed discount. hampton by hilton. g new cars. you're smart. you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car. you'll see what a fair price is, and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar.
eye drop approved for both the signs and symptoms of dry eye. one drop in each eye, twice a day. common side effects include eye irritation, discomfort or blurred vision when applied to the eye, and unusual taste sensation. don't touch container tip to your eye or any surface. remove contacts before using xiidra and wait at least 15 minutes before reinserting. chat with your eye doctor about xiidra. we're back with senator angus king. we're following the breaking news on an urgent meeting at the white house after the senate health care bill. the vote was delayed. senator, i want you to stand by. there is other important news we are learning, including about the trump administration's
evidence that syria may be preparing to launch a new chemical weapons attack. the white house warning bashar al-assad that if that happens, he will pay, in the words of the white house, a heavy price. let's go to our correspondent barbara starr. barbara, president trump, is he drawing a new red line in syria? >> reporter: well, it appears he just might be, would have. he is making clear he will not tolerate another chemical attack by the assad regime. and this time hoping, at least, the russians can make that stick. syrian president bashar al-assad climbed into the cockpit of a russian aircraft. the kremlin's military chief of staff watching nearby. just as moscow and damascus get an ominous warning from president trump about assad getting ready for another chemical weapons attack. a sudden overnight statement from the white house saying, the united states has identified potential preparations for
another chemical weapons attack by the assad regime that would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children. warning that assad will pay a heavy price. >> the goal is that this, not just to send assad a message, but russia and assad a message, if this happens again we are putting you on notice. >> reporter: they watched the air base for days. [ inaudible ] used in april when they attacked civilians with sarin nerve agent. the u.s. responded then firing 59 tomahawk missiles, but fresh intelligence has the u.s. worried. >> the information that we have that we saw became more compelling in the last day. >> reporter: u.s. symmetry shows aircraft in a shelter with chemical weapons nearby. it's not clear if assad and his backers got the message. >> my hope is that the
president's warning will certainly get russia and iran to take a second look and i hope that it will caution assad. >> reporter: trump's warning was closely held until the last minute. the white house and the defense officials say secretary of state rex tillerson and defense secretary james mattis knew about the intelligence, but many other officials unaware. the u.s. military has options for president trump if he decides to act. the president has drawn a red line, suggesting conditions for action, something he said he would not do. >> i don't want them to know what i'm thinking. >> reporter: but if trump doesn't act, he's in the position of potentially knowing about a future attack against civilians and not stopping it. >> if we were to wait for an attack to happen, knowing that it was about to happen, then yes, we have abrogated responsibility under the u.n. charter. >> reporter: now, if assad were to proceed, pentagon officials
are letting it be known they do have the assets in place to offer the president military options to deal with it all. wolf? >> all right, barbara, thanks very much. barbara starr at the pentagon. let's get back to senator angus king of maine. senator, did the president, did the white house draw a new red line with this statement that was released? >> when you use the term red line, when you say there will be heavy consequence if you act, i think that is about as close as you can come. and i think the president has made it clear that there will be some response. the truth is that he's in the same box president obama was in sometime ago. he's made that statement, if there is an attack of whatever size, he is committed to some kind of, as he said, heavy consequence, serious response. >> as you saw pointed out, the u.s. drawing a red line during the obama administration. was if a mistake for the trump
administration to put out a statement like that? a lot of us remember the red line president obama drew back in, what, 2012. >> and when president obama didn't follow-up on that when that red line was violated, it hurt our credibility throughout the middle east and indeed i think in the world. so, i thought the lesson from that was, don't draw red lines, but convey your message as strongly as possible through as many channels as you can. but, you know, let's agree that the use of chemical weapons is an awful thing to even contemplate. it's been not part of a law of war for over 100 years since world war i. virtually every country in the world has subscribed to that agreement. and, so, there should be some response. again, you want to be careful about red lines because then you've blocked yourself in and flexibility is what you always want to maintain in foreign policy. >> should president trump get authorization from congress before escalating the conflict in syria, senator, with more
military action? >> absolutely the answer to that is yes. there is no authority now for the president -- for any -- there wasn't authority for president obama, there isn't authority for president trump to be operating in syria. there was an authorization passed a week after september 11. it is an entirely situation, entirely different geography. syria, wolf, is an incredibly complicated place. there are 1200 opposition groups. iran is there. hezbollah is there. assad, isis. i mean, what worries me as we get more aggressive and we talk about the possibility of shooting down airplanes and those kinds of things, about every ten years or so i reread a book called guns of august by barbara took man, it's a story of world war i which was a series of mishaps and accidents. that's how wars start. and i think we need to have a clear definition of what we want to accomplish, why we're there, why we're doing what we're
doing. i think one of the frustrations that we've had, john mccain has expressed this over and over. there's no strategy. there's no long-term definition of what our goals are, what our exit strategy is, what we're trying to achieve. historically, our only interest in syria has been isis. and to the extent we're turning our attention to assad, that's a new piece of authority. there is no authority. i understand, i just learned this morning that the foreign affairs committee of the senate is thinking about taking up a new authorization, and i believe they should. >> let's not forget the russians are deeply involved in promoting and backing bashar al-assad's regime in syria as well with a lot of military activity. but, senator, if there were to be another bashar al-assad chemical attack against civilians in syria, killing civilians and children, would you support another u.s. military strike on syrian targets without formal authorization from congress?
>> i think if it's a limited strike that's strictly related to the chemical warfare side of things, the chemical weapons side of things, i think the answer to that is yes. if it's a broader strike that strikes at different areas, different air fields, different parts of the syrian regime, then -- in other words, if it's an attack on the government of syria under the guise of responding to a chemical attack, then i would certainly draw the line there. and this, this is a good example of why this is so difficult and so dangerous. i think the president [ inaudible ] to be prepared to respond to a chemical attack. but my concern is it could easily escalate [ inaudible ]. we need to know exactly what we're doing and why we're doing it. other than the chemical weapons, there isn't a justification that i have seen. >> senator king, thanks so much
for joining us. >> thank you. >> just ahead, new reactions to the delay of the u.s. senate vote on health care. the president's attempts to pressure members of his own party. we are also going to take you inside the russia investigation as one of the prime targets of the russian cyberattacks is questioned up on capitol hill. de plaque psoriasis,... isn't it time to let the real you shine through? maybe it's time for otezla (apremilast). otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months,... with reduced redness,... thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't take otezla if you're allergic to any of its ingredients. otezla may increase the risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts... or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss.
your doctor should monitor your weight... and may stop treatment. side effects may include diarrhea,... nausea, upper respiratory tract infection... and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ask your dermatologist about otezla today. otezla. show more of you. whimper yap yap yap yip is your dog trying to tell you something? allergic itch in dogs is a medical condition that's more common and treatable than you think. that's why there's prescription apoquel: the revolutionary medicine that's giving millions of dogs the relief they deserve. apoquel goes to the source of the itch to provide relief in as little as 4 hours. woof and apoquel is safe without many of the side effects associated with the use of steroids. apoquel is for the control of itch associated with allergic dermatitis and the control of atopic dermatitis in dogs. do not use apoquel in dogs less than 12 months old or those with serious infections. apoquel may increase the chance of developing serious infections and may cause existing parasitic skin infestations
yeah, and i can watch thee bgame with directv now.? oh, sorry, most broadcast and sports channels aren't included. and you can only stream on two devices at once. this is fun, we're having fun. yeah, we are. no, you're not jimmy. don't let directv now limit your entertainment. xfinity gives you more to stream to more screens. breaking news tonight,
senate republic cans summoned to the white house to meet with president trump after majority leader mitch mcconnell was forced to delay a vote on the republican health care bill which is facing very stiff opposition from some conservative and more moderate republican lawmakers. let's dig deeper with our experts and analysts. gloria, how big of a miscalculation was this? at least so far on the part of the majority leader? >> look, i don't blame mitch mcconnell for trying here, i really don't. he wanted to get this done before the july 4th recess, before members go back home and face their constituents. after all, this is a very unpopular bill. so, this is what he tried to do. perhaps he should have included more people in the deliberations. that's always a good idea. but it turns out that they have to go back to the drawing board. this isn't the first time this has happened in american history and it won't be the last. so, i think mcconnell may have underestimated the kind of opposition this was going to
receive, but i don't -- i wouldn't under estimate mitch mcconnell either. >> there was a similar set back in the house of representatives. a >> yes. >> and they passed it narrowly. >> they may be able to do it again. we don't know. i think it's going to be harder to get the moderates here than it will be to get some of the conservatives who want to get to yes. >> one problem, rebecca, this trump aligned group, preparing these really very, very tough negative ads against republican senator dean heller of nevada who is up for reelection next year, because he had serious questions about the bill. a lot of other republicans were very angry at that. >> right, including senator mitch mcconnell, the republican leader. i mean, this is the main political group for donald trump. his administration has given this group his blessing, their blessing. and, so, you have to coordinate to some extent with the republican leaders on capitol hill. you cannot just take mitch
mcconnell by surprise with these attack ads when he's in the process of trying to get these votes together for a major complex controversial piece of legislation. so, this was this group, i think, showing its age, in part. they're new at this. this has only been around a few months and donald trump is still having cooperation built out. it was no doubt about it a strategic misfire. they are taking the ad down today it is being reported. the damage has been done. this is not good for heller. they're doing the democrats work for them. >> we have confirmed they are pulling down that ad. ryan, these republican members of the senate, they're going to be going back to their states. they're going to be having some town halls presumably. what is going to be the impact of this delay on a final vote? >> well, if you look at all of the commentary from democrats and activists after mcconnell pulled this today, it was keep doing what you're doing, the resistance is working, we made this happen. so, liberals and democrats are extremely emboldened. they think that their calls and
their campaigns against this bill are what had an effect on some of these senators. whether that's true or not, i'm not sure. it surely had an effect on perhaps some of the more moderate members, not necessarily the rand pauls of the world who want the bill to move to the right. so, i think you're going to see some intense activism from the left, from the so-called resistance going to these town halls and confronting republicans, especially when one of the main criticisms is the process that this legislation is gone through or lack of process. it really has not been a very transparnlt proces transparent process. there haven't been any hearings on the legislation. it hasn't been fully vented. they're going to hear from their constituents which is why mitch mcconnell wanted to pass this before the recess. that's a bad sign. any time politicians want to hide legislation and pass it before they go home to face their constituents, that does not pass the smell test. >> you know, while this is all unfolding, there were some serious developments, phil,
overseas, including the effect on a u.s. pharmaceutical merc. a bunch of companies, mostly in ukraine, but elsewhere in europe, were hacked and there is deep concern this may just be a test to see if they can do it there, maybe they can do it here as well. this is raising a lot of alarms right now. if you take a look at the cyberattack in ukraine, politicians, postal service, central bank, even the chernobyl nuclear plant, they were all hit. >> boy, if you look at what's happened in the last 8, 10, 12 months, cyber war has come to america. this is totally different. not state sponsored. you're talking private organizations that are getting into companies, as you said, banks, transportation, extremely disrupt it in europe. this is also hitting russia, hitting south asia. you mentioned hitting merck in the united states. what is happening here is what's called ransom wear. they operate in the dark,
they're going into organizations, freezing their information and saying, if you want to get your information freed, if you're a bank, if you're a transportation company, you've got to pay us and you've got to pay us with untraceable money. this hacking problem is exploding. this is maybe one of the biggest hacks we've seen out of the ukraine. >> it's a huge, huge development. it is causing i know a lot of concern here as well. everybody stand by. just ahead, global confidence in the u.s. president now down. we're going to take a closer look at how that is impacting the trump administration's foreign policy. the answer to it all. ♪ we want to need each other. ♪
casper makes one perfect supportive and comfortable. premium foam layers. breathable for airflow. perfect rebound, plus perfect lift. pick your size, you get 100 nights to test it out. test the layers, be a layer, casper. g new cars. you're smart. you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car. you'll see what a fair price is, and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar. today's senior living communities have never been better, with amazing amenities like movie theaters, exercise rooms and swimming pools, public cafes, bars and bistros even pet care services. and there's never been an easier way to get great advice.
a place for mom is a free service that pairs you with a local advisor to help you sort through your options and find a perfect place. a place for mom. you know your family we know senior living. together we'll make the right choice. lwho's the lucky lady? i'm going to the bank, to discuss a mortgage. ugh, see, you need a loan, you put on a suit, you go crawling to the bank. this is how i dress to get a mortgage. i just go to lendingtree. i calculate how much home i can afford. i get multiple offers to compare side by side. and the best part is... the banks come crawling to me. everything you need to get a better mortgage. clothing optional. lendingtree, when banks compete, you win. okay! ...awkward. it's not just a car, (work sfx) it's your daily retreat. the es and es hybrid. lease the 2017 es 350 for $329 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
i have age-related maculare degeneration, amd, he told me to look at this grid every day. and we came up with a plan to help reduce my risk of progression, including preservision areds 2. my doctor said preservision areds 2 has the exact nutrient formula the national eye institute recommends to help reduce the risk of progression of moderate to advanced amd after 15 years of clinical studies. preservision areds 2. because my eyes are everything.
president trump is hinting at a possible new military strike against the syrian regime of bashar al-assad. in a statement the president said the united states is aware that the assad regime may be preparing for another chemical weapons attack against civilians and warned that the government will, quote, pay a heavy price if it's carried out. so, phil mudd, did the white house draw a new red line with the latest statement as far as the syrian regime is concerned? >> they sure did. this one is drawn with a magic marker doubled down. you can't go into a new administration and say we're going to be different than president obama who did not respond when assad used chemical weapons. use our military capability the first time assad uses weapons and not [ inaudible ]. i think there are some tough questions, though, wolf. last time significant operation,
but against one air field, i think if you're in the white house you have to say, you make it bigger, for example, you get out of an air field and go after a regime target. make assad sit up. second big question, the russians know this is coming. what do they do, respond in kind in a way they are not anticipating? i think a red line is drawn. if they use chemical weapons the president has to hit the go button. >> go ahead. >> here's the question i have, and maybe you can answer. why do this publicly? this is a president who says he doesn't like to telegraph what he's thinking to anybody. would you ordinarily be letting the russians know in a different way that you're onto them, or is this something that's completely acceptable to do it in a public way? >> i think there's a couple reasons to do it publicly. number one, there is a potential, i suppose, the syrians say, we're not going to do this. number two, you limit casualties at the location, russian casualties, by saying if you guys are at the location, russians that is, where the syrians are hosting airstrikes, you better get the heck out.
there are missiles coming in. i think there are two reasons, including humanitarian reasons. >> it's interesting. during the campaign, presidential campaign, then candidate donald trump really went after the obama administration often on the campaign trail saying that the obama administration -- the united states was not being taken seriously by friends or enemies around the world. listen to a few of his comments during the campaign. >> the world is laughing at us, folks. they're laughing at us, at our stupidity. they laugh at us. they're laughing at us. it's crazy what's going on. everybody is laughing at us. they're laughing at us. we don't know what we're doing. they're laughing at us because they think we're stupid. the whole world is laughing at us. they're laughing at this, at what's going on in our country. the world laughs at us, folks. the world laughs at us. >> you get the point what he was saying during the campaign. but according to a brand-new pew research center poll just out,
by the end of president obama's presidency, 64% of the people in these 37 countries surveyed had confidence in the u.s. president. that now stands at 22% for president trump. so, how much more difficult does this make u.s. foreign policy? >> a lot more difficult. trump has a credibility problem at home because he misstates the facts frequently and says things that aren't true. he has a similar problem abroad where a lot of foreign countries are not looking to the united states for leadership in the way that they once were. a lot of our european allies have said this, like angela merkel in germany. and some of our alliances in asia are not as strong as they were at the end of the obama administration because trump, you know, for either because he's sort of stumbled into it or because he genuinely believes it, he has adopted this sort of america first, we're going to
take care of us and not, you know, not emphasize the alliances that we traditionally had since world war ii. i will say on syria, there was a lot of uncertainty and lack of clarity about what our policy was in syria and what his view of the use of force was. you have to give the white house credit for being crystal clear now. they have one red line, that is, if assad uses chemical weapons that will precipitate a u.s. military response. they don't seem to care about anything beyond that, but they have a very, very clear policy about the use of force on that. the complicating thing is it is a little unsettling that we don't have a use of force resolution to governor this, right? and that is something that congress really should look at. the president has now determined that he can use force against the assad regime without going to congress and without a use of force resolution. >> congress is reluctant. >> absolutely. >> rebecca, because those 59
tomahawk cruise missiles were launched against assad's regime at the air base in april. the us could do that again. >> absolutely. with this public statement warning syria that they should not launch another chemical weapons attack, it's a red line. that's basically sending a message that if you do take this action, if syria, you do launch another chemical attack and move forward with that, there will be a u.s. response. if there isn't, that is problematic for the administration because they put out this statement. and then you have a question of what do those words actually mean. >> all right. everybody, stand by. there's more unfolding efforts to get the republican health care bill through the senate. now in disarray with the vote on the measure postponed. what is president trump telling lawmakers tonight? plus, a cnn special report uncovers new details of russian -- the u.s. election. yes, nice pop toss!
adapted to my weight and shape, has so i sleep deeply, and wake up ready to perform. right now, save up to $500 on select tempur-pedic mattress sets at our july 4th event. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪ sorry about the holdup, folks. we have some congestion on the runway and i'm being told it'll be another 15, maybe 20 minutes,
and we will have you on your way. ♪ runway models on the runway? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money evan saved by switching to geico. i would not wear that lace. hmm, i don't know? fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. you supported him through four years of undergrad... and medical school. it's no wonder he said, "you don't have to pick me up." at lincoln financial, we get there are some responsibilities of love you gotta do on your own. and some you shouldn't have to shoulder alone. like being able to maintain your lifestyle, no matter what comes your way. ask a financial advisor how lincoln can help you get through your retirement, and not just to it.
new tonight, hillary clinton's presidential campaign chairman interviewed by the house intelligence committee as part of its russia probe. john podesta says he was happy to cooperate with investigators, including the hack of podesta's own e-mails which were made public by wikileaks during the campaign. it is the subject of the cnn special report tonight, the russia connection, inside the attack on democracy. jim sciutto anchors that special report. here is a preview. >> in addition to the organizations that were targeted, multiple individuals were targeted with spear
fhishing e-mails that resembled google warnings. >> john is the director or intelligence analysis at the cyber security firm. >> they clicked on those thinking they were security warnings, and those basically transported them to a place where the adversary could collect their credentials and reuse them to gain access to their accounts. it was a realistic e-mail. it looked fairly legitimate. >> a prime target was the chairman of hillary clinton's campaign, john podesta. >> there was a google alert that there was some compromise in the system and to change the password. >> this seemingly benign message was a spear phishing e-mail that prompted him to change his e-mail immediately by clicking on a link. it was signed best, the gmail
team. >> it actually got managed by my assistant that checked with our cyber security guy and through a comedy of errors, i guess, he instructed her to go ahead and click on it and she did. >> the fatale error, podesta's it person wrote back calling the e-mail legitimate, when, in fact it wasn't. >> he meant to say the opposite, right? >> he meant to say it was illegitimate. the rest is history. >> and our chief national security correspondent jim sciutto joins us now. looks like a great documentary you put together. t john podesta met with members from the house intelligence committee. you spoke to him for the documentary. how might he help shed light on this hack that he fell victim to? >> you know, i think one of the big take-aways is just how easy it was in retrospect.
a spear phishing e-mail looks like something from e-mail. and even that mistake that his cyber team meant to say don't click on it, a typo, auto correct, who knows how it happened, and he says it comes across as legitimate. they click on it. that gives the russians access to 50,000 of his e-mails, his entire private e-mail account for years and it was those e-mails that, as we saw at the campaign as the election got closer that were released really on a daily basis and had an enormous effect certainly on how the campaign was covered and from podesta's point of view, had an effect on the outcome. >> what do you think some of the questions that members of the house intelligence committee asked today of podestpodesta? >> i think it was what were the missed signals? what should have been done earlier to stop this from getting bigger? and something that came across
to us, it wasn't just podesta's it team, it was the democratic national committee, even the intelligence community, as they saw this playing out early, none of them had a sense of how big this was going to become. and in retrospect, you can argue that all of them should have acted with more urgency to handle this. but the trouble was, there wasn't really precedent for this kind of attack on a u.s. election and no one could predict at that point what russia was going to do with all these e-mails and documents. of course we saw it in real life as it played out. but in the early months no one predicted that effect. >> we were reminded with that massive hack in ukraine. here in the united states as well. your documentary takes viewers inside the russia investigation. explain a little bit more about what you uncovered. >> here is another thing. one, it is continuing. that these attacks did not end on november 8th, 2016.
in fact, russian hackers are still probing both democratic and republican political organizations, voting systems, et cetera, and that's a real concern going forward because in this election, while there is no evidence the intelligence community has been very public about this that vote tallies were affected, there is nothing to stop that from being different in 2018 or 2020 and it doesn't stop at russia because china, iran, north korea all have very active cyber programs. they were all watching how this played out in the 2016 election. and when i spoke to both democrats and republicans on the relevant committees on the hill, in the intelligence community, all of them say they were watching and we need to brace ourselves and protect ourselves so that this doesn't happen in even greater form in future elections. it is a real concern going forward. >> certainly is. jim sciutto doing amazing work for us as he always does. thank you for doing this documentary later tonight.
be sure to join for the russian connection, inside the attack on democracy. it airs at 10:00 p.m. eastern. must-watch tv. that's it for me. thanks very much for watching. erin burnett outfront starts right now. >> breaking news, an embarrassing set back for the president. the senate forced to postpone its vote on the health care bill. what happens next? plus the white house calling possible trump russian collusion a hoax as the president keeps up attacks on barack obama. and donald trump obsessed with a "time" magazine cover showing his face. the problem is it's fake. let's go out front. i'm erin burnett. the breaking news forced to back down in an embarrassing setback. republicans forced to postpone a vote on the senate health care bill. it is a blow to the president. he had the