tv Erin Burnett Out Front CNN July 13, 2017 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT
i think it is a genuine thing. they talk a lot. so i think there was a personal connection that worked. >> and it is good to see after all those wars between the bushes and the clintons they can sit on the same stage together. time heals all wounds. thanks very much for watching. erin burnett starts right now. outfront next, breaking news, senate investigators want answers tonight, demanding information from donald trump's son and son-in-law. trump's defense of their meeting with a russian lawyer add up? his father point man in doing business in russia. he once said it is a scary place. and trump's comments about the french first lady's figure. yeah. did he cross the line? let's go out front. and good evening. we begin outfront tonight with the breaking news demanding answers. senate investors want
information from donald trump jr. and jared kushner. mark warner says they asked documents from both man. one red flag is kushner's failure to disclose three meetings with russians on his initial security clearance form. >> it seems strange to me that those meetings were at least conveniently forgot by mr. kushner. >> this comes as president trump speaks out today defending his son's meeting with the russian lawyer, a meeting set up with the promise of, quote, information that would incriminate hillary. information the e-mail says was from the russian government. trump's explanation for the meeting is it's business as usual. >> i think from a practical standpoint, most people would have taken that meeting. it's called opposition research. that's very standard in politics. >> except apparently it's not very standard. trump's own nominee for fbi director testifying to congress
that anyone approached by a foreign national with that type of information should call the fbi first. but trump did not stop there in his defense of his son. >> he took a meeting with a russian lawyer, not a government lawyer, but a russian lawyer. >> now, the crucial thing here about what he just said is it actually contradicts the e-mails that trump jr. himself released after this meeting was exposed because in one of the e-mails the e-mail talks about scheduling a meeting between trump junior and let me quote, the russian government attorney who was flying over from moscow. so that's what was in the e-mail. that's what they thought wthey were doing. it doesn't appear there was any question who trump junior thought he was meeting with. a lot of developments to get to tonight. i want to begin with manu raju.
what more did senator warner tell you. >> reporter: he's requesting records from jared kushner and donald trump jr. he made this request along with the republican chairman of the committee. he wants more information from kushner raising concerns that kushner did not disclose some key meetings in warner's words three meetings with russian officials left off some initial forms as well as information he is looking for from donald trump jr., presumably information related to this newly revealed meeting from last year with this russian lawyer. now, the question is when those two men will come before the committee. warner would not say when that would happen. either richard burr who i talked to about as well. but clearly these two men of interest to the committee as they are demanding more records. >> and i know you also had a chance to speak with the top republican in the senate judiciary committee, and he had something important to say.
>> yeah, he did. he actually wants to hear from donald trump jr. in his own committee. this is the first time we've heard a republican chairman making this formal request for public testimony or some testimony from donald trump jr. he told me earlier today he is writing a letter along with dine feinstein to ask for mr. trump jr. to testify before his committee. i asked him would you subpoena for his appearance? he said, well, let's see how he responds first. as we know donald trump jr. said he is willing to testify. the question is does he agree to do that and does he agree to do it as soon as next week and that's when dine feinstein would hope he does appear. >> thank you. i want to go to paris now. that is where the president is this evening. president trump is there giving a defense of his son today during a joint press conference he gave with the french president. he also defended his son-in-law and his former campaign chairman
paul manafort. >> reporter: that's right. if president believes his aids or his son did anything wrong, he certainly was not letting on. in fact, at this press conference, donald trump was asked about donald trump jr.'s meeting with a russian lawyer. here is a portion of what the president had to say. >> it was a meeting that went very, very quickly, very fast. two other people were in the room. i guess one of them left almost immediately and the other was not really focussed in the me meeting. i think from a practical standpoint most people would have taken that meeting. >> reporter: so you could see him down playing that meeting. most people would have taken it. he compared it to regular opposition research that you would see on any campaign and also on air force one flight to paris, president trump told reporters on board he just heard of this meeting a couple of days ago and suggested this was all new information to him.
but of course, erin, the backdrop of this is a trip he was hoping to focus on stronger ties with the french president, hoping to celebrate bastille day and congressmen rate america's role in world war i but it is clear he cannot escape questions about russia. >> thank you very much, sara, in paris tonight. let's go to the democrat senator. senator, thanks for being on the show. you just heard reporting from capitol hill. your colleague, senator mark warner raising concerns about jared kushner's mission, right? he admitted meetings with russians, three of them, on his security forms, security clearance forms. we know he only added to the form an amendment, a revision, this meeting with the russian lawyer in recent weeks. failed to do. he revised it once. failed to put this in and then put it in. should he have security clearance at this point or not. >> i believe it would be
reviewed. there is so much about this that is just not right. you have the president's son, his son-in-law and his campaign manager setting up a meeting with a person who is described as a russian government lawyer to discuss, to discuss undermining hillary clinton's campaign and helping trump. and it is presented as part of an ongoing russian program to support trump. so this was clearly not the first instance and no one expressed surprise about this. so there is a lot more here to discover. >> so when you say this is clearly not the first instance, you think there were other meetings or discussions? you don't think this is the first time this happened or the only time? >> no. there are two things you should respond. if you get an e-mail saying that a member of your team is suggested a meeting with a russian operative, the first is, really? what the hell is this all about? the second is let's call the fbi. i mean, this is completely
unacceptable, conspireing with a foreign nation to undermine the integrity of an american election. >> all right. so i want to ask you about a couple points you made there. first this issue of calling the fbi, right? we know christopher wray has said that's exactly what he would have done. but maybe donald trump jr. didn't know to do that. that's what the president said today. he defended his son. i want to play again some of his defense for you, senator. here he is. >> i think from a practical standpoint, most people would have taken that meeting. it's called opposition research or even research into your opponent. >> senator, would most people have taken that meeting? he's making the argument, look, someone comes to you. say they have dirt on your opponent. you are running for president of the united states. wouldn't a normal person just want to check it out? >> absolutely not. this thing has violation of law written all over it. you cannot take help from a
foreign government in an american election. it's a violation of law. the reaction would be, first of all, you would -- to that whole e-mail string you would be, what, we're going to have our top three people, the son-in-law, the son and the campaign manager at this meeting with this russian lawyer? no, no. absolutely not. i mean, it's clear that they didn't respond and say what is the background of this? they knew there was more background just from the fact that they didn't respond. this is -- all through this, trump has maintained that there was no contact, no coordination, no collaboration. clearly you have -- you have the mission. you have his trump team. you have the russians in the same room. you have the e-mail that lays out its part of an ongoing program. there is no surprise on the part of the trump team and there is really very unlikely that with the campaign manager, the son and the son-in-law all there
that trump knew nothing about this. >> there may be a very big difference, though, between a russian and a russian operative, which was a word you used a moment ago in this interview. look, the president says the person his son met with was not connected to the russian government. we heard him say not a government lawyer, but a russian lawyer. we know the lawyer denies she is connected to the kremlin. no has the kremlin. no surprise there. so we don't know at this point. but i'm wondering from your perspective, senator, do you have any proof that when you use the word operative that she was an operative of the russian government? >> what we know is the campaign manager, son and son-in-law all went into that meeting thinking they were meeting with a russian government attorney. now, if it was or wasn't, their expectation was this was somebody tied in to team putin. >> and you believe something you
said a moment ago as well. you find it hard to believe that the president of the united states did not know about that meeting, even though of course he has directly denied knowing about it until just a few days ago? >> i am sorry to say the president of the united states, president trump, has great difficulty speaking accurately about the events in our country. >> so is this meeting for you the smoking gun? >> this is absolutely, absolutely. i mean, the defense is that we didn't actually get anything good out of this meeting. that's been the defense. that's not the question. the question is whether you were aware of an ongoing russian effort, which this e-mail lays out, whether you were meeting to obtain information, which they admit that they were. and, so, this is definitely the type of collaboration that other events made us think might exist, but we hadn't seen it laid out so crisply.
>> all right. thank you very much. i appreciate your time, senator, as always. >> you're welcome. thank you. and next donald trump jr.'s danming e-mail chain. did a phone call take place? you're going to see this laid out. and donald trump jr.'s long history with moscow. should he have known better than to meet with a russian lawyer or a rush b government lawyer as the e-mail said. plus an american in paris. trump commenting on the figure of france's first lady and taking a question about his good friend jim. >> you have mentioned a friend, jim. we told you that paris is no longer paris. >> who's jim? does he even exist? ♪ if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis,...
isn't it time to let the real you shine through? maybe it's time for otezla (apremilast). otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months,... with reduced redness,... thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't take otezla if you're allergic to any of its ingredients. otezla may increase the risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts... or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight... and may stop treatment. side effects may include diarrhea,... nausea, upper respiratory tract infection... and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ask your dermatologist about otezla today. otezla. show more of you.
and these kids are having a bake sale for their soccer team so i need some cash. can i give you my mother's maiden name or my first concert or - [team member] oh, well, now you can just use your phone. [customer] my phone? [team member] yeah, just open the wells fargo mobile app and request a one-time access code. [customer] that's way better. all set. thanks. they have snickerdoodles! [team member whispers] i love snickerdoodles. [customer] thanks!
new questions tonight about that e-mail chain between donald trump jr. and the man setting up the meeting with a russian lawyer. did a separate phone call take place in between e-mails, a phone call that could be crucial because if you read closely, the e-mails seem to make it clear that could have happened. trump junior was asked directly about a phone conversation. now, here's what he said. >> at any point were you told ooit inner a phone conversation
or otherwise what they might tell you, what they -- what goldstone seemed to be implying you would receive. >> it was this e-mail coordination, let's try to set up a meeting and see what happens. and in the end it wasn't about that at all. >> pamela brown is outfront. pam, you have been going through these e-mails. walk us through them and why there is one hour here on the time stamps in particular that could be crucial. >> they do raise the question of whether a phone call ever took place between him and agilara. during the exchange reason goldstone says, hi, don, let me know when you are free to talk by phone about this. he responded, rob, can we speak now. goldstone writes, let me strak him down. what number can he call. okay. he's on stage in moscow, but
should be off within 20 minutes, so i'm sure he could call. that was at 3:43 p.m. on june 6th. raising the question whether a phone call took place during that time. around 24 hours later, goldstone sent another e-mail saying evan asked i schedule a meeting with you and the russian government attorney. i believe you are aware of the meeting. so how else would he be aware of that meeting? >> i really can't speak to what rob goldstone was thinking or what he wrote or why. but i'll tell you again that that call didn't happen. i don't know if there was someone else who spoke to donald trump jr. about this perspective meeting but it wasn't my client and i don't know where mr. goldstone got his information from, but it's just categorically incorrect. >> i spoke to him on the minute ago and he reiterated that.
he said there was no phone call that took place before or after that meeting with either. we have reached out to don junior's attorney and we are waiting to see if he will be testifying on capitol hill as was requested by lawmakers today. erin? >> thank you very much, pamela. as soon as possibly next week dine feinstein wants. let's go to jeffrey tubin, april ryan, along with mark preston. you have gone through all these e-mails. pam laid it out very clearly. to me it sounds like there is a phone call. does it sound that way to you? >> sure, it seems that way. but we don't know for sure. and the only way to determine that and so much else about this meeting is to have a real investigation. you know, giving an interview to shawn hannity is not an investigation. that's public relations. if he is going to really cooperate, he's going to talk to
the fbi, he's going to produce his phone records and most importantly, he's going to produce any other e-mails that dealt with this subject. so, you know, yes, we know a good deal about this meeting given these -- given these e-mails, but a thorough investigation would involve a lot more, including examining phone records to see if any such phone call took place. >> what of course you got lawyers coming out and directly saying it didn't. that's going to add a whole other level to this. part of the reason this call is getting attention is because of what donald trump jr. told shawn hannity during that pr interview the other night. so let me play that exchange again. >> at any point were you told either in a phone conversation or otherwise what they might tell you, what goldstone seemed to be implying you would receive?
>> it was all basically this e-mail in order nation, let's try to set up a meeting and see what happens. in the end it wasn't about that at all. >> now, you heard him say, right, it was all basically ord nation. you know, interesting way to answer this considering that not only did he say call on my cell that they would obviously they already had his cell and the guy that wanted to call him is a pop star on stage and it was important enough that he was going to call 20 minutes right when he stepped off the stage. >> well, erin, i'm going to say this, you're focussing on that, but there are a couple words at the very beginning that really strike me. >> yes. >> as i recall -- as i recall, that's what donald trump jr. is saying and also the words as i remember. these are words that the attorneys are making sure those who are involved in this investigation of possibly being eyed or in the microscope of the
fbi, they are definitely using those words because it allows them the chance to omit, if you will, certain things. if i remember, as i recall, so those are very interesting terms that they are using. he's not saying quite definitely, yes, i did or didn't. so he gets out of the legalities of that, as i recall, as i remember. >> mark, how significant will it be if it turns out this phone call did happen? i'm going under the assumption here that investigators will get those phone records and we will know if a phone call happened and how long that phone call was. >> well, a couple things. let me answer it two ways. let me answer it legally, but i won't go too far because that's jeffrey's per view. we don't know what was said during the telephone call. but the fact that if it were to happen, if it were to have happened and he did not disclose it and he has to disclose it because he is testifying before congress or before robert mueller during the investigation, then that is
another effort or another way of donald trump jr. trying to conceal what exactly happened. politically i will tell you that republicans right now are starting to get nervous and starting to get more frustrated. when i say that i mean elected republicans because they see this as another straw put on the camel's back and the camel is not ready to collapse at this point. but it seems like more and more straw is being added to it. you will start to see republicans be on ben sasse, lindsey graham, who will start to part with donald trump. go ahead, april. >> mark is absolutely right. hearing from my republican sources that donors are concerned right now. they are very concerned with the quote, unquote, drip, drip, drip of these e-mails, this scandal of the white house. they're concerned at how the scandal with these e-mails, particularly this current situation, how it will affect the emerging scandals will
effect republican power and the power structure. >> so, jeffrey, when it comes to are we going to know whether there was a phone call, right, does mueller have the ability to get those phone records, or is that a totally separate process here? >> they definitely have subpoena power and cell phone records are routinely obtained by prosecutors and investigators of all kinds. but i don't think people should get their hopes up for a dramatic piece of news. let's say there is a phone call. donald jr. says -- >> we're still not going to know what was on the call. >> he says i don't remember what was said. pretty much the end of story. so i think, you know, it's all part of a mosaic that investigators have to look at, but there are a lot of questions they want to look at and one phone call, one e-mail is not going to determine, you know, the future of the trump
administration. >> you know because, mark, here is what's interesting. they are coming up with excuses for what happened, but the most recent one is, you know, this is a guy i don't know well. this is an acquaintance and they have said that now several times. let me just play it. >> an acquaintance sent me this e-mail. i was basically sit thrg listening as a courtesy to my acquaintance. sometimes you do things differently for acquaintances than for friends. >> mark t poi, it doesn't matte whether it was your best friend, a brother or an acquaintance. who did you think you were meeting with to get what kind of information. on the e-mails are very clear, a russian government attorney because the russian government supported donald trump. >> it is in the subject line of the e-mail. it is not body of the e-mail. to your point, it doesn't matter if it is his best friend, which it doesn't seem like these are his best friends.
if you laook all the language ad willingness to have a discussion about such a sensitive matter, that's more than somebody that you would just do it, you know, to help somebody out or to hear out a so-called acquaintance. >> if i could add one point to that, it is not just that donald trump jr. went to this meeting. he brought jared kushner and paul manafort, the campaign chairman. so this was not just a casual meeting. i think everybody knows how busy people are in campaigns. so get those three them in that room, it has to be something they were pretty much looking forward to hearing. >> you would think so. the point is what did you expect. april, before we go, one more thing i wanted to ask you. the president today had that joint press conference with emmanuel macron, president of france. at the end he calls for a final question from an american journalist.
trump did something unusual, calling on a man who said he was a journalist from phoenix tv of china. how big of a break from protocol is this? >> it is a huge break because when it is 2-2, it is an american journalist or those traveling with the american press core and then someone from that home country. now, i talked with some of the high ranking members of the white house correspondent association board. people are not familiar. some of the people the board talked with, they are not familiar with the reporter who asked the question. and really understanding the dynamics and what happens at the white house, it was an effort, basically, to stay away. he took that one question about his son and he answered it talking about, you know, yes, you know, many people would have take than meeting and it also talked about the opposition research. he answered it and then he
wanted to move on. it was clear it was strategy to move away from it. but we are not familiar. many of us, i am not familiar, we are not familiar with the reporter who stood up and asked the question. >> all right. thank you very much. and next our special report on donald trump jr.'s history with russia. it is obviously crucial now in the context of what he really knew about a russian government attorney. why did he once warn about bribery in that scary place of moscow? and did president trump cross the line with this? that's cool. showing off my arms? that's cool. being comfortable without a shirt? that's cool. getting the body you want without surgery, needles, or downtime? that's coolsculpting. coolsculpting is the only fda-cleared non-invasive treatment that targets and freezes away stubborn fat cells.
visit coolsculpting.com today and register for a chance to win a free treatment. there are the wildcats 'til we die weekenders. the watch me let if fly. this i gotta try weekenders. then we've got the bendy... ... spendy weekenders. the tranquility awaits. hanging with our mates weekenders and the it's been quite a day... ...so glad we got away weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct at hilton.com and join the weekenders. finding the best hotel price is now a safe bet. because tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites - so you save up to 30%
that's why at comcast we're continuing to make4/7. our services more reliable than ever. like technology that can update itself. an advanced fiber-network infrustructure. new, more reliable equipment for your home. and a new culture built around customer service. it all adds up to our most reliable network ever. one that keeps you connected to what matters most.
new tonight, president trump telling reporters it would be a smart move to invite the russian president vladimir putin to the white house at the right time saying, quote, i only want to make great deals with russia. now, the trumps have quite the history when it comes to dealing with russia, especially donald trump jr., a man who in the past seemed to be quite fond of moscow. alex is out front. >> president trump has long played down his business ties with russia. >> i have nothing to do with russia. i have nothing to do with russia. >> in fact, he made decades of efforts that are now at the core of how donald trump jr. came to have that meeting with a supposed russian government attorney. michael has investigated the trump family's business ties in russia. >> it has been clear that for years the trump organization and donald trump jr. in particular have been very interested in
developing business in russia. donald trump jr. talked about it repeatedly over the years, through to moscow, made multiple trips. >> all of the trumps russian projects fizzled out until 2013 when a deal was struck with kremlin died retied real estate developers. >> you're my partners. you're my very powerful, very rich, very nice. great people. >> the father and son, who was also a pop star who performed at the pageant. after trump tweeted i had a great weekend with you and your family. you do a fantastic tower. trump tower moscow is next. >> the trump tower in moscow would become donald junior's baby. >> they sign a letter of intent to build a trump tower in moscow with the group which is the company owned by the billionaire
oligarch very close to vladimir putin. and donald trump jr. was put in charge of that project by his father. >> but according to him, when the u.s. sanctions hit russia in 2014, the deal began to fall apart. they were allegedly the ones trying to pass on the supposed incriminating information on hillary clinton and appeared to still view donald junior as the trump's point man on russia. the publicist said they got the documents from a russian prosecutor, a claim they now denied. >> when he writes to donald trump jr. in the e-mail that this is comes from amin, it obviously registers with donald trump jr. because he immediately replies, says he'd love it. >> despite his apparent fondness
for russia, donald trump jr. did say it, quote, is a really scary place. as much as we want to take our business over there, russia is just a different world. a different world the trumps had tried to break into without much success. but when long-time friends came calling from that world with potential help to the campaign, donald junior took it seriously. >> he wanted to hear the information. if there's information out there, you want it and then you make what you do with it. >> russia was synonymous with business hopes for the trumps. and they did here in new york and elsewhere according to donald trump jr. he said in 2008 the russians made up a pretty disproportional cross section of a lot of our assets. he seemed to be a big fan of russia's capital tweeting pictures when he was there on trips and once telling an audience i really prefer moscow
over all cities in the world. erin? >> alex, thank you. let's go now to jason miller and kirs tin powers. jason, trump junior in the past, here's the thing. he is saying now, look, i got this e-mail about a russian government attorney and i'm a business guy. of course i wanted to hear what they had to say. he would haven't the first instinct to call the fbi. but he had done a lot of trips to russia. he called it a, quote, scary place. are you surprised he would have gone ahead with a meeting like this as he thought it was. >> i think it's important to take a look at where things were at the time this this e-mail came in. this was well before any of the russian news came to the forefront. the introduction came from an acquaintance. and again it is not like the e-mail said that somebody is going to depart the kremlin, hop into red october, park it, uber
across town and come up to trump tower to present some information to you. it was a lawyer that was in town for some client matter that wanted to drop by and chat with them. it ended up being a 20 minute meeting. >> a russian government lawyer with highly sensitive information from the russian government that supported mr. trump. >> but it is referring to a simple op dump essentially which happens in every campaign. my point being is this russia cloud wasn't in existence then and donald junior is approaching this from a 15, 20 year background in business, not politics. we saw donald junior say when he was on another network that he would have handled things a little bit differently. but again the e-mail said this lawyer was coming over here for a client meeting. we know that's backed up from the story in the hills saying this lawyer was here on a special visa or waiver that loretta lynch had given to her. so that seems to back up the
case. >> what does that have to do with the intent of who she was? it doesn't really matter if she was meeting with anybody else. >> the only news out there at that point had anything at all, the slightest bit with russia was the uranium one use dealing with hillary clinton. i have no idea if that was something that donald junior was aware of or not. but frequently on campaigns -- >> okay. >> i have been doing this for 20 years and people always try to raise info. and it ended up being a 20 minute meeting and i think don junior is really unfathirly getting hit here. >> 20 to 30 minutes is of course what he said. but i want to be clear on the exact parameters here. is he being unfairly judged. >> i can't keep track of all the things that jason just said that are just not true, not accurate. i mean, first of all, donald junior is not being mistreated
here. that's absolutely absurd. this is not something that people do. it's not something that people in politics do. it is not something that people in business do unless they are unethical or unless they like to break the law. so it is not -- you say, well, he is this person who worked in business and didn't work in politic sos we can't expect him to know that russia is a hostile government that is actually not a friend of the united states and that actually should not be involved in american elections. >> you would know that very well. >> i would say if you are at least have gone to high school, you probably should know that. this is very basic that russia is an adversary of the united states. this person clearly stated that they worked. you just said it was a lawyer. it was a government lawyer identified as a government lawyer. it was somebody who made it very clear that the government of russia was supporting president -- or then, you know, candidate trump's run for the
president. i mean, there is just nothing about this that is gray. and anybody with any ethics would not have this meeting. it is that simple. >> let me ask you in the context of what happened today, the fbi, christopher wray, director nominee was asked about this. he said if anybody got this request they should call the fbi. so you're saying donald trump jr. who did have extensive business experience in russia and therefore knew all these issues, he should have if he was business there, that he didn't know, maybe he was naive. but paul manafort was in that room. surely he would know if you get a mail like this, you call the fbi. >> well, we've publically from don junior. we have not heard from paul manafort. i saw somebody close to paul manafort said he hadn't read all the way through. i'm not going to pretend to speak for paul manafort. i'll allow him to do that in his conte context. but going back to don junior,
which is the focus of what we're talking about here, look, he took a 20-minute meeting and then that was it. there was no further talk between them. >> let me be clear here because i have to make this point. i understand you're saying that, right? but it seems a bit of a ridiculous point. obviously he took the meeting because he was hoping there was information. if there was information in the meeting, i would be credulous to think she would have followed up. >> let's go back. so i'm going to -- >> so you're saying they would have come with all this information and said, wait a minute, it's not appropriate. we're not going to use this information? really? >> very important distinction here or i guess a point of clarification. when this person came into the meeting, she sat down and started talking about some absolute gibberish nonsense about how the russians were funding the dnc and hillary clinton's campaign. i think all three of us would agree that theory or that
concept is completely laughable on its face. and as it sounds from don junior describing it that everyone in the room thought that was completely ridiculous or everyone on the campaign side. after that the lawyer pivoted to talking about russian adoptions which we know after this meeting the lawyer went down to d.c. and teamed up with a former democratic congressman to lobby people on democrat -- on russian adoptions. >> what's your point? >> you're telling me they wouldn't have done anything with it? >> i'm saying in campaigns when people call up and say they have research or information or they have a tip or something like that, typically you sit down and you hear them out. now, what's different here and what i would have done differently is go into a full vetting and figure out exactly who is coming in. that's the difference of my having a 20 year background in bis rather than politics. that's where i think that would be -- >> jason. >> but people call up in every
campaign and say i have some op. >> i would hope any good business person would vet who is going to be on that calendar. >> you know when a random person calls up that the campaign chairman does not sit down with them. you know that. you have to admit that, that that is not the first person that they meet with on the campaign. >> well, and again i hadn't started with the campaign yet. >> no, no, no, any am pain. any presidential campaign, that is not how you get in the door. your first meeting is not with the campaign manager. i mean just please admit that. >> neither one of us were there. neither one of us know the way it played out. >> i'm telling you there is not a single presidential campaign in the history of the world that you walk in the door as some random person that claims they have opposition research and sits down with the campaign manager. the fact you won't admit that sin credible. >> i'm not going to speculate on something i wasn't there and
wasn't hearing it. but the only actual interference that we've seen from some outside entity was again we saw from the january "politico" story where the dnc consultant went over to the ukrainian embassy and got information about president trump's campaign and used it to go and attack one of the people on his campaign. that's the only thing we have actually seen so far. >> all right. we'll take a break. thank you both. and next just moments ago george w. bush and bill clinton talking pol politics, yes, together. and trump often talks about his friend jim and his love for paris. we ask who is jim? noo
hundreds of dollars on youmy car insurance. saved me huh. i should take a closer look at geico... (dog panting) geico has a 97% customer satisfaction rating! and fast and friendly claims service. speaking of service? oooo, just out. it was in. out. in! out. in! what about now? that was our only shuttlecock. take a closer look at geico. great savings. and a whole lot more. we, the entertainment-loving people, want an unlimited data plan that gives us more. we want more than just texting. more than just surfing and shopping. because sure, we want to use this to call the people we love- - like our directors. but mostly, to get the entertainment we love. maaaaark ! ! ! switch to at&t for the only unlimited plan that gives you 60 channels of live television on any screen all for $70 a month.
tonight a new version of the senate health care bill dangerously close to failing, as president trump is now telling reporters, and i quote him, i say the only thing more thing than peace between israel and palestine is health care. it might not have enough republican support to get to the floor. ryan nobles is "outfront" with more. >> reporter: hours after the new version of health care reform, the bill is already in jeopardy. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell can only afford to
lose two republican votes, and already two senators are firm nos. but for different reasons. >> that's what we promised the voters. >> reporter: collins tweeting, still deep cuts will vote no. will work with gop and dem colleagues to fix it. the 172-page bill is designed to fulfill the gop promise to repeal and replace the affordable care act. there is no one with more at stake at this stage of the debate than mitch mcconnell who was called out by president trump on wednesday. >> he's got to pull it off. mitch has to pull it off. he's working very hard. he's got to pull it off. >> what happens if they don't? >> i don't want to talk about it. i think it will be very bad. i will be very angry about it. a lot of people will be very upset. >> reporter: mcconnell in the senate today promised a revised plan would help bring the party together. >> after extensive confrontations across the
conference, meeting with constituents and intensive conversations with members, our conference has updated the last month's better care discussion draft with additional provisions to make it stronger. >> reporter: but the plan is not the major overhaul that some senators were looking for. it keeps in place many of the sharp medicaid cuts proposed. it includes a version of the so-called cruz amendment that allows insurers that sell obamacare plans to also offer policies outside the confines of affordable care act regulations. it adds more money to state stabilization funds to help lower premiums, particularly for the sick. the bill also avoids repealing obamacare taxes for wealthy americans, a reversal from the previous gop plan, and it boosts funding to combat the opioid crisis. while the mood coming out of the it all was positive, there are still concerns that the bill doesn't go far enough. >> no version repealed most of
the obamacare taxes. this repeal about half of the obamacare taxes. >> reporter: there are two senators who are in the "no" camp right now, susan collins of maine and rapid paul of kentucky. but most senators tonight remain undecided. they'll wait for the score from the congressional budget office which is expected to be out early next week. erin, that will tell us how many people will lose coverage under this plan and ultimately how much it will cost. erin? >> thank you very much, ryan. "outfront" now, our former republican senator from pennsylvania, presidential candidate, health care important for him. working closely with lindsey graham and bill cassidy on the issue. senator, you've been on the hill all day. does this revised health care bill have the support, in your view, to come to a vote? >> i don't think it does yet. but as you mentioned, senators bill cassidy and lindsey graham are working on an amendment that i think if added to the mcconnell bill, i think mitch mcconnell made some improvements.
i think he's trying to listen to his members. now i would argue that he needs to listen to the nation's governors, and that's what they're doing, talking to governors. they're talking to medicaid directors. they're trying to make sure we can hand off the ball. this is what the grant caddie bill does. instead of trying to fix -- he mentioned several things he's trying to fix with obamacare. stop trying to fix something that shouldn't be fixed at the federal level and really just send a large block grant back to the state, try to mimic what republicans successfully did with bill clinton, i might add, in 1996 on welfare reform which i worked on which was, let's get flexibility and lots of money. i mean, this is a big tradeoff. give more money so states can deal with this problem. give them the flexibility to design markets in each state. and end this federal stranglehold on health care laws. >> so in an interview yesterday, the president said he would be angry if republicans can't get a
bill to his desk, talking about mitch mcconnell specifically saying he has to pull it off. is that rhetoric helping or hurting coming from the president? >> i don't think it does either to be honest with you. i think every republican in that room, i was in a couple of the meetings today. every republican in that room realizes that it's important to try to get something done. but they want -- look, people want to make sure we're not re placing a very bad system with something that isn't going to cause as many or more problems. i think they take this very, very seriously. and a lot of senators are engaged in trying to work on things. and that's a good thing. so i'm very happy that we're seeing this engagement, and mitch mcconnell is listening, and i think there's more listening to be done. >> all right. senator santorum, thank you. just moments ago, former presidents bill clinton and george w. bush together in a public appearance, bill clinton talking about the current political environment. >> we might be homophobic and sexist and other things, but we
don't want to be around very many people who disagree with us normally. and we get news in silos, and the truth is, in an interdependent complex world, diverse groups make better decisions than homogenous ones. >> "outfront" now, jamie, how significant that a former president is calling out the current political climate like we just heard bill clinton do? >> those two men are very disciplined and determined not to talk about donald trump. they really don't want to do it. but if you're going to get close to it, look, that's -- that is where that was going. a very different climate. and just watching the two of them together at this event, it feels like a completely different era. they talk about bipartisanship, they get along, they smile, they genuinely like each other. but they have both been very careful not to -- they don't even say the words donald trump. they may do a policy criticism.
bill clinton did on climate change. george bush did on petfar funding. but that's -- that is as close as they're going to get. >> jamie, the two of them obviously getting along -- well, i mean, almost silly to say this, but much better than donald trump and barack obama. >> absolutely. look, george bush likes to joke that bill clinton is his brother from another mother. they genuinely get along. they like to laugh. they like to gossip. if you ask one about the other, they get a twinkle in their eye. the camera doesn't lie. they like each other. but what i thought was striking about today is just the different tenor. it's a completely different political time era. >> all right. thank you so much, jamie. next, french twist. donald trump overheard commenting on the looks of france's first lady.
when you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, the unpredictability of a flare may weigh on your mind. thinking about what to avoid, where to go, and how to work around your uc. that's how i thought it had to be. but then i talked to my doctor about humira, and learned humira can help get and keep uc under control... when certain medications haven't worked well enough. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. raise your expectations and ask your gastroenterologist if humira may be right for you.
or getting chummy with her husband, the president, somebody was missing. jim. >> a friend of mine, he's a very, very substantial guy. he loves the city of lights. he's told me for years, paris, paris. jim, let me ask you a question? how is paris doing? paris? i don't go there anymore. paris is no longer paris. france is no longer france. >> reporter: he talked about jim so often trying to make the point that france had succumbed to terrorism, that the "new yorker" started hunting for jim in vain. he inspired tweets like just hanging out with #jim. when the white house refused to say whether jim actually exists, thus was born jim, the president's imaginary friend. with his own twitter account insisting, i exist, "the view" dedicated a photo album to jim. ♪
a french reporter brought him up at the joint press conference. >> you've mentioned a friend, jim. we told you that paris is no longer paris. >> that's a beauty. you know what? it's going to be just fine. because you have a great president. >> reporter: if jim were imaginary, it wouldn't be the first time that an invisible character entered the political fray. would it? >> what do you mean shut up? >> reporter: clint eastwood wowed the republican convention. >> what do you want me to tell romney? i can't tell him to that. he can't do that to himself. >> reporter: judging from their body language, donald trump's imaginary friend gets between the two presidents. >> i'm coming back. >> you are also welcome. >> reporter: what about jim? they're making him jealous. jeanne moos, cnn. >> france is no longer france. >> reporter: new york. >> they won't like me for saying that.
>> and thanks so much for joining us. don't forget, watch "outfront" anytime, anywhere. "ac 360" begins right now. good evening. thanks for joining us. we begin with the president's defense of his son and his koimted misstatements of facts. continuing because there's a pattern which includes making bold claims unsupported by facts or contradicted by them. leveling allegations about individuals with big attribution, or no attribution at all, unless somebody said somehow counts, which it doesn't. in paris, for bastille day, standing next to his french counterpart, he defended the meeting his son had last year with a russian lawyer. a lawyer his son was told was a russian government lawyer with information from the russian government. he's a wonderful young man, the president said, making is sound like trump junior isn't the exact same age as the president of france is. >> i think from a practical