tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN July 13, 2017 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
quick programming note, tomorrow night at 9:00, cnn special report, the first son, the life of donald trump jr. time now to hand things over to don lemon and "cnn tonight." president trump says it's no big deal, anybody would have taken that russia meeting. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. the president clearly has no problem defending his son's meeting with the russian attorney, a meeting explicitly set up with the promise that russia could supply dirt to incriminate hillary clinton. here's what he said in his news conference today with french president emmanuel macron. >> nothing happened from the meeting. zero happened from the meeting. and honestly, i think the press made a very big deal over something that really a lot of people would do. >> well, the truth is that
meeting is a very big deal. not because the press is talking about it, but because the trump campaign was clearly ready and willing to accept help from a foreign power. and that foreign power is russia. donald trump jr. insists months ago that no meeting with russians were ever set up. he changed his story about the meeting five times. the president says it's nothing. he believes his son, but have they earned your trust? let's discuss ntonight. i want to bring in cnn's senior political analyst, mark preston. senior political commentator, david axelrod. jennifer jacobs, white house reporter for bloombergnews. david, editor at large at "time" magazine who wrote a story on donald trump jr. president trump is defending his son. he's saying sort of meeting that donald trump jr. took with the russian lawyer is typical in politics. watch this. >> as far as my son is concerned, my son is a wonderful young man. he took a meeting with a russian
lawyer. not a government lawyer, but a russian lawyer. it was a short meeting. it was a meeting that went very, very quickly, very fast. two other people in the room, i guess one of them left almost immediately and the other one was not really focused on the meeting. i do think this, i think from a practical standpoint, most people would have taken that meeting. it's called opposition research, or even research into your opponent. >> so, david, clearly has no problem with what donald trump jr. did. he says it's typical opposition research. >> yeah. well, let me tell you, i've been involved in politics, covering it and as a strategist for four years. i've been at the highest levels of presidential campaigns. four of them. this is not standard. this is not normal. this is much different than opposition research. when you get tipped by someone you know who is close to people
you know to be close to the russian government, and you're told the russian government wants to help you with information about your opponent, that is not opposition research. that is very close to espionage, and the thing you should do is not have to the meeting. the thing you should do is get in touch with the fbi. and the fact that donald trump jr. didn't, the fact that the seniormost people in the campaign were involved in that meeting, is an alarming fact. >> yeah. mark, why is -- listen, why are we sitting here pretending that this is normal? that there might be some other excuse than what there actually was, that the president -- what the president said that he actually believes that anybody -- no one believes that. this is clearly just a strategy, their last hope in trying to get everyone believe there is no other side. what he did is wrong and a foreign government should not be involved in our election. do we have to sit here and pretend there's anything other than that? >> don, you and i and david
axelrod have been doing this now for months and months and mons on this show where we try to explain and try to give some kind of credibility to why something happens that just seems to outrageous and we always come back time and time again is we can't. i mean, we try to do our best, but we can't. you know, for our viewers out there who are wondering about opposition research, you knows, f for the reporters here, we get this all the time. we get phone calls all time, e-mails all the time. to david's point there, you have to figure out who it's coming from, what their motive is, where it's going, the whole nine yards. now, in all the years that i've been in the game, and i'm sure everybody on the panel, i've never had somebody come from a foreign government to try to take down an american politician. >> if that were the case, if that were to happen, what would you do? wouldn't you get in touch with the fbi or -- i mean, that's what most rational, sane people would do. i don't understand how people are pretending like this is okay. this is not okay.
even the president is. >> look, it's such a complicated issue right here, but let me just say this very quickly, is that donald trump jr. might be naive to this. okay. we understand that. we could perhaps -- >> the "new york post" is right about donald trump jr. is an idiot in their editorial if he doesn't know? >> look, that's the "new york post's" decision to call him that. however, when you look at the other folks involved in the meeting, specifically pawn m ia manafort who's been in politics a lot longer than any of this on this panel, he should have known in the very, very at least. he didn't say anything. >> jennifer, what's your take? why do we have to pretend there's any other excuse than actually what happened? >> he took a few tactics that were interesting. during the press conference he said the word, young. he said, my son is a wonderful, young man. he did a gaggle on air force one last night on the way over to paris in which he called his son
a good boy. he said he's a good kid. today he also equated him with a veteran campaign strategist in which he said, any campaign strategist would have taken this meeting. so it's just -- >> you know what, jennifer, before you finish, he's saying he's a kid, whatever. do you realize he's the man he's standing on stage with, about six months apart in age, one of them is the leader of france, and the other one is his son he's calling a kid. >> exactly. they're both 39 years old. >> factually. so, i mean -- >> yeah -- >> -- duh. >> he just was trying to argue. he was trying to say that don jr. was a little bit naive here. he's a good kid, he's a wonderful kid, he didn't quite know what he was doing. he went on to say anybody would have done it. >> yeah. but their defense is that he's not, david, -- he's not naive, that anybody would have done this. >> right. it's a profoundly mixed message, but what i'd like to focus on, two things, one, this is a big story because it's not an interpretation, it's not a
guess, it's not from the outside looking in. this is donald trump jr.'s own language saying if it's true, what you, tipster, are telling me, that the russian government wants to help elect my father by giving us dirt on hillary clinton, if that's true, i love it, i love it. then he schedules the meeting. he walks into it thinking he's going to get dirt. all of this is from his own words. and not just him, but as has been pointed out, basically the entire inner circle of the trump campaign gathered for a meeting in the middle of a busy time to meet this person, expecting to get stuff from the russian government to help elect donald trump. that's them saying it, not us, and for the president of the united states to go out on worldwide tv and say, that's
normal, that's the way we do things in america, anybody would do it, is really a shocking development. >> is it -- is he inviting others to maybe do the same, other foreign adversaries to do the same? instead of shutting it down on a foreign stage? >> you know, i don't know. he -- if he's thought that far through. one of the things that's striking about this is that the president and his family still seem to think that this is a p.r. problem, that it's being ginned up by the press and if they can get the right press message out that it will go away, but they are feeding into a large, independent special counsel's investigation that is going to follow this wherever it leads, whether the press follows it or not, whether it's on tv,
whether it leads the news or not. it's not going away. >> yeah. hey, mark, i want it ask you, the question now is whether a phone call took place in addition to the meeting because republicans disagree with the president. senate judiciary committee chairman chuck grassley sent a bipartisan letter to donald trump jr. requesting he testify. pamela brown, our very own pamela brown, is reporting that they're curious whether a phone call ever took place between donald trump and emin agalarov. here's why. he writes, i won't read the whole thing. says "hi, let me know when you're free to talk." it goes ons, they try to set up talking and meeting, whatever. "thanks for your help." it goes on. you know, fast forward 24 hours, gets more e-mails. they get more e-mails. the question is, how would he be aware, agalarov's lawyer denied a call happened, but if a call happened, are we ever going to know about a call? >>. >> well, yes, we could because you have the house of representatives and the united
states senate who have subpoena power where they can go and get the phone records as can robert mueller. they can go get the phone records. however, we don't necessarily know what will have been said on that call if a call, in fact, did happen. there's not going to be a transcript of it. you're not going to be able to subpoena others to come testify before congress, specifically the russians and this gentleman, the go-between, you know, from great britain. so, look, how this could be damaging, don, is two ways, just very quickly. one is it will erode the credibility of donald trump jr. even more because he hasn't been truthful about this so far. and it's going to cause more headaches for republicans because they are now getting very, very tired of this story here in washington. >> stick around, everyone. we have much more to talk about. when we come back, president trump changes his tune on paris. why he suddenly loves the city of light. plus, more e-mail trouble for team trump.
i chose soccer over college because the opportunity was to good to pass up. but in the back of my mind, it was always that void, i want to earn a degree. i chose snhu because it gives me an opportunity to go back to school in a life that is chaotic. i want to have a strong foundation to attack that next challenge with. to actually commit to it is always the hardest but you always have to push through that. find out what you can achieve at southern new hampshire university,
the official education partner of major league soccer. even if you're trying your best.be a daily struggle, along with diet and exercise, once-daily toujeo® may help you control your blood sugar. get into a daily groove. ♪ let's groove tonight. ♪ share the spice of life. ♪ baby, slice it right. from the makers of lantus®, ♪ we're gonna groove tonight. toujeo® provides blood sugar-lowering activity for 24 hours and beyond, proven blood sugar control all day and all night, and significant a1c reduction. toujeo® is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar,
which can be life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor about all your medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins, like toujeo®, may cause heart failure that can lead to death. find your rhythm and keep on grooving. ♪ let's groove tonight. ask your doctor about toujeo®. ♪ share the spice of life. president trump defending his son's meeting with a russian lawyer calling it very standard and saying most people would have taken. let's discuss. david von drehle. this is the latest cover from "time" magazine. the cover reads "red handed, the russia scandal hits home." talk to me about this cover.
>> we -- as i say, it's -- if you look in the background of the image, it's obviously donald jr. in the foreground, but then sort of screened over him is the text of the e-mail chain. it's his own words. he's the one who said how excited he would be to have the opportunity to cooperate with the russian government to effect his father's election. so, that's where "red handed" comes from, and obviously it's the story of the week. we've talked about why that is the -- needs to be the "time" cover. we know that president trump, in particular, has kind of got a thing about "time" covers. i don't think this one's going to end up on the wall in any of his golf courses. >> yeah, he does. he likes to boast about how many times he's been on the cover of "time" magazine, even has the
fake cover of "time" magazine hanging in a couple of his golf clubs for some reason. i mean, if we take a look at some of your recent covers, donald trump jr. now joins the ranks of jared kushner, special counsel mueller, steve bannon. how do you think that's going to go over with the president? >> he is said not to like it when people around him occupy that space, and, but on the other hand, you know, there was a lot of talk after the steve bannon cover that bannon was in the doghouse, that he was going to be on the way out, and, yet, we see that, in fact, he continues to have an enormous influence over the president and his strategies and his policies. so, i wouldn't make too much of that. >> yeah. i want to talk a bit more now about president trump on the international stage. do you remember how he used to knock paris by referencing his friend, jim? here's president trump then and now. watch this. >> i have a friend, every year he goes to paris. i haven't seen him in a while.
paris, oh, the city of lights, he used to tell me, for years, paris, paris. i see him, like, a month ago, how is paris this summer? oh, i don't go to paris, you kidding me? it's no longer paris. >> you've mentioned a friend, jim. we told you that paris is no longer paris. >> you better let me answer that one first. that's a beauty. he's the one that asked the question. that wasn't even one of my picks. you know what, it's going to be just fine because you have a great president. you have somebody that's going to run this country right. and i'm coming back. you better do a good job, please, otherwise you're going to make me look very bad. >> okay. so, david axelrod, we still don't know who jim is or even if he exists. i don't -- may have to rethink his options on paris right now. what do you think of that moment? >> well, i think the most interesting thing about it is how macron handled trump. he obviously had a strategy.
he proffered the invitation for trump to come to paris. he knows that trump is warring with most of europe. he's at odds with chances lor merkel in germany. clearly marron has seized the opportunity here to try to forge a relationship and he knows that the way to do that is to tone down conflict and tone up the flattery. if you looked at that press conference, you could see a lot of that in action. a little bit of what prime minister justin trudeau of canada has done. the young guys have figured out how to game the president and understand if you treat him well, he will respond, he will heal as he did today. >> jennifer, what did you make of president trump taking a question from a chinese reporter instead of an american journalist, as is tucustomary, even after he was prompted by macron to take a question from an american? >> the most striking thing about that exchange was the fact of what the president didn't say. as you know, today was the
death -- the day that, you know, liu xiaobo, i believe you pronounced his name, died in china. the u.s. government had been advocating for him. he had cancer. they'd been advocating for the chinese government to release him. he was a political prisoner. jailed for fighting -- for the end of one-party rule in china, fighting for free speech for decades. very much admired. the u.s. government had been pushing for the chinese government to release him and to leave china, to get better care and instead of saying something, you know, all these world leaders today made comments about mr. liu, and the president lost an opportunity to honor him, to mourn him, to say something to recognize him. >> mark -- >> goes wrond that, actually. >> go ahead. >> don, it was beyond that because he praised xi of china as a good friend. he attested to his character. he had not a word to say, not just about a dead martyr for freedom and democracy, but also
about the chinese policies that kept him in prison until his death. >> mark, president trump was asked, was also asked by reporters on air force one about his g20 meeting with putin and suggested if he challenged him more on that, twice -- then twice on hacking, that would have ended up in a fistfight. here's a quote. "i told him, i said, look, we can't have -- now we have" -- so
hard to read, his quotes. "we can't have now he said absolutely not twice. what do you do, end up in a fistfight with somebody, okay?" a fistfight? >> just bravado on his part, you know, he's not -- gosh, who am i to say this, i'm certainly hi not the most eloquent person in the world. that's not a very eloquent way to respond to a person when you're the leader of the free world wehen you're talking abou the biggest issue right now we're talking about in the united states. what i think is interesting, just to follow up on what david axelrod said about marron, this
is how he responded to it, specifically today when during the news conference when they were talking about russia. he said, basically, can we answer your question? i will noter be sphere er binr domestic policy. to which trump said, what a good answer that is. macron was very, very smart to kind of give trump that little bit of, you know, not a poke, but a little bit of a boost because it's certainly going to help him down the road. i agree with david axelrod, he did play this very, very well today. >> jennifer, one of the pool reporters on the plane put out another excerpt that was put on record about donald trump jr.'s meeting saying they talked about the adoption stuff which was actually a big thing at the time, but nothing happened. he added, "in fact, maybe it was mentioned at some point, but then when asked if he had been told it was about hillary clinton, and dirt against her, he said no."
president trump is saying the meeting may have been mentioned but just yesterday president trump said he told reuters that he only learned about it just a couple days ago. so, what's -- how do you jive that? >> right. that's unclear. it's unclear exactly what he means there. that's definitely going to need follow-up questions. he said a couple times he just learned about the meeting in the last two, three days and sarah huckabee sanders has repeated that at the podium in the press briefings. >> when you listen to, david von drehle, so many explanations, does it really matter? >> this -- >> go on. >> this is the thing with covering the trump administration and covering the president. whether it's intentional, strategic, for him to speak the way he is or not. the fact he is often inarticulate and other times reverses himself, says things that are 180 degrees opposite of
what he said an hour before or day before does give them a lot of wiggle room, at least with their base. they don't hold him to any kind of standard of consistency or honesty. and so they continue to do it. we in the media have to kind of figure out how much of our time we're going to spend running around trying to, you know, nail this mercury to a board and how much time we spend trying to advance the ball rather than hold him to, you know, what do you mean, what did you say? this is, again, to go back to why the e-mail chain is so important, it's them talking. it's them acting. it's their thinking. and there's no walking away from it. >> mark and david are often on the program. >> hey, don -- >> i'm sorry, i have to go, david. but jennifer -- >> all right, please do that. >> jennifer and david von
drehle, thank you for coming on. good to have you, fairly new to the panel. so david axelrod sits down with civil rights leader and american hero congressman john lewis. that's on "the axe files" tomorrow night at 10:00 eastern and pacific. you won't want to miss that. just ahead, president trump's personal attorney apologizing tonight for sending threatening e-mails laced with profanity. we got that story when we come right back.
it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
president trump's personal lawyer in hot water tonight and promising an apology. marc kasowitz represents the president in the russia investigation. he's accused of sending threatening profanity-laced e-mails to a stranger. kyung lah has the story. i want to warn you, some of the language is obviously offensive. >> it's got a lot of disparaging, personal information about mr. kasowitz. >> reporter: the e-mail tirade began from a segment on cable tv. the unnamed viewer was watchi i msnbc's rachel ma zoddow talkin about an article published by pro publica on marc kasowitz and why he doesn't have security
clearance. >>. >> reporter: the viewers sourced out kasowitz on his website and e-mailed him according to e-mails published by propublica. the viewer write "marc, you don't know me, i don't know you, i believe it's in your interest and long-term interest of your firm for you to resign from your position." five minutes later kosowitz replied with two words, f-you. 15 minutes later, kaswoipz e-mailed again, you don't know me, but i will know you. how dare you send me an e-mail like that. i'm on you now. you are expletive with me now." he continues to berate the writer ending the e-mail, "watch your back" then an expletive. the up named vi edunnamed viewe writing thank you. kasowi str kasowitz wrote me. call me. the last e-mail "i know where you live. you might as well call me.
you will see me. i promise. bro." >> shocking e-mails in the legal profession and as counsel to president of the united states. >> reporter: cnn legal analyst and prosecutor paul callan is also a new york attorney, aware of kasowitz's aggressive take no prisoners reputation which is infamous in new york's legal circles. shortly after fired fbi directors james comey testified before the senate intelligence committee, kasowitz swung hard on behalf of the president. >> the president never in form or substance directed or subjected that mr. comey stop investigating anyone. >> reporter: back then, just like in this e-mail tirade, callan sees echos of team trump. >> lawyers often become like their clients when they represent clients over a lifetime. and, of course, donald trump brags about the fact that he's aggressive, he takes no prisoners, as melania onces said, i think, you know, if you hit him once, he'll hit you back
ten times harder and it seems l mr. kasowitz engages in similar tactics. >> reporter: whether kasowitz will face disciplinary action because of the e-mails, callan doesn't think so saying they're not a direct far of the legpart case. kasowitz releasing a statement, saying "i should not have replied in that inappropriate manner. this is a time when someone wishes he could reverse the clock, but of course i can't." kyung lah, cnn, los angeles. >> classy. thank you, key young. i want to bring in cnn contributor john dean. former white house counsel for president nixon and author of "conserve we've atives without conscience." good evening, mr. dean. we know mr. kasowitz since expressed remorse. i must ask you, is this appropriate behave for the lawyer representing the president of the united states?
>> well, trial lawyers are pretty good at controlling their emotions, don. this is a very seasoned trial lawyer. he just decided to let his inner bully go out and run roughshod over this guy. it's really quite surprising. it might have been the end of a long day, as he said, but he had control of himself and he just decided to go after him and be abusive which is what bullies do. >> do you think mr. kasowitz is going to face any repercussions for his behavior? >> there are -- the american bar association's model code does have a provision that says attorneys should not do anything to embarrass the profession. so this depends on the new york bar and what -- how their view of it. they may cut him some slack as a first time, but if he has this problem again, i suspect they might give him a call. >> i wonder if it shows the amount of pressure that he's under to have, as you said, a seasoned trial attorney respond that way.
i mean, do you -- what does it say that he has such an aggressive reaction? >> well, there have been stories also that he's having some trouble with his client and his client and he are having some differences of opinion about how the defense is being handled and whether it's being handled appropriately since kasowitz is the head of the russian defense. so there may be some underlying tension there. he's obviously working long days. if he got this e-mail at 10:00 at night and responded to it. so pressure could well be showing. >> yeah. i want to ask you about -- let's talk more about this e-mail controversy surrounding donald trump jr.'s e-mails. what role do you think that this new development will play in the overall russia investigation? >> well, i think it certainly shows an attitude and a mentality. the fact that the e-mails were exchanged with other people who were at the meeting, who are clearly within the ambit and
being looked at by the special counsel, it shows kind of a collective mindset that they were certainly prepared to take negative information on hillary clinton from the russian government and were actually looking forward to it in the person of this lawyer who came in. also, the fact that they all forgot the meeting on their -- on their security clearance form is very striking. >> yeah. this is yahoo! news who's reporting that president trump's legal team was informed more than three weeks ago about donald trump jr., the e-mail, arranging that june 2016 meeting with the russian lawyer. and just yesterday donald trump told reuters he learned about the meeting, "a couple of days ago." but he said on the plane last night that maybe it was mentioned at some point. and now we learn his legal team knew about it weeks ago, so what gives here? >> it's hard -- we don't know what his lawyers were or were not telling him.
i think when it first came up is when jared kushner registered and acknowledged the meeting to his amended fs-86 form, the clearance form. that would have alerted everybody at that point that he was going to put that out there. so i would be surprised, in fact, if trump didn't know contemporaneously about the meeting. it'd be shocking if his son had this, what they thought was going to be a hot source from russia tell him some negative stuff about hillary. i'm sure that buzz went around the campaign headquarters which were kind of small and intimate. >> right on. you know, you served as white house counsel for president nixon during watergate. what must be going through the minds of the attorneys representing and advising the trump family right now? >> well, there are two sets of attorneys. one is the white house counsel now, unlike during watergate, it's been cleared up.
the client is the office of the president and not necessarily the officeholder. so, that office, the entire white house office, does not represent trump, per se. that's why he has kasowitz as his private counsel who is sort of the head of a whole team of private lawyers. i think that they're all seasoned lawyers and they probably don't muse a lot on what their client is or not thinking or trying to give him the best advice they can. he's somebody who we all know apparently has a history of not following the advice of his lawyer. that's a standard operating procedure and one of the reasons he chooses the lawyers he selects. because they're not offended by it. >> john dean, always a pleasure. thank you. >> thank you, don. when we come back, in the midst of all this controversy, an awkward moment in paris today when president trump said to the french president's wife and why people are buzzing about it. here's to the safety first... i think i might burst... totally immersed weekenders.
whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct with hilton.com and join the summer weekenders. you don't let anything lkeep you sidelined. come on! that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein, and 26 vitamins and minerals... best one ever! for the strength and energy, to get back to doing what you love. ensure, always be you. going somewhere? whoooo. here's some advice. tripadvisor now searches more than 200 booking sites
to find the hotel you want and save you up to 30%. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. working my canister off to clean and shine and give proven protection against fading and aging. he won't use those copycat wipes. hi...doing anything later? ooh, the quiet type. i like that. armor all original protectant. it's easy to look good.
>> i have a son who's a great young man. he's a fine person. he took a meeting with a lawyer from russia. it lasted for a very short period and nothing came of the meeting. and i think it's a meeting that most people in politics probably would have taken. >> so let's discuss now. cnn senior political commentator jennifer granholm, as well as political commentators alice stewart and matt lewis. can you guys ree rarack it? don't play the audio. did you see macron's face as he was saying that? he's talking about this son. look at his reaction. so, listen, the president is trying to normalize something that no one thinks is okay or normal, alice. >> well, yeah. the key to what he said is most people would have taken that meeting. news flash, most people in politics would not have taken that meeting. look, a great thing, a beautiful thing, and campaigns thrive on
it oftentimes and they will welcome oppo but when you are told you are being set up with a meeting with someone that's bringing information from the russian government that will provide incriminating evidence about your opponent, and say they want to help your campaign and hurt your opponent, you don't take that meeting. you pick up the phone and you call the fbi because that just sets up a scenario where you could be in coordination. i'm not saying they did anything wrong. this stinks to high heaven, to say everyone does it is an increase to everyone else. >> governor, would anyone have taken the meeting as the president says? >> of course not. here's the weird thing. don trump jr. is a knee fighneo young man and kushner whoingi n campaigns. paul manafort, he's been around
the block. he knows this stuff. he was in the meeting. he was the forwarded the e-mail. don't tell me he didn't know what this was. it was very clear in the e-mail. he knows very well he shouldn't be taking that meeting. i don't think anybody gets off the hook. >> so, matt, if this is a standard meeting as he says, why, then, the drip, drip, drip of details, oh, then they didn't have a meeting, then it was about adoption. why not just disclose everything from the start? >> oh, because they're hiding it, because either they did something really bad or they knew that it'd appear -- at the very least, it would be the appearance of impropriety. it's funny, this actually -- i never thought of donald trump this way, but it's starting to actually remind me of bill clinton a little bit. remember the -- you know, the parsing of language -- >> oh, no. oh, no. >> not talking about the behavior specifically. >> what the definition of "is" is. >> that woman, miss lewinsky. remember there was a time he was counseling this young lady for a
while, like that was the spin. so it's obviously a very different story but it's sort of clintonian. the last thing i'll say, the paul manafort thing, this is paul and parcel -- the attorney who -- his attorney who used that vulgar language in an e-mail, trump just like the clintons i think has surrounded himself with a bunch of very shady -- >> don't do that. >> very shady -- this is history. >> he's on the clinton territory -- >> clinton wasn't surrounding himself with shady characters. i mean, you've got a point that you're making about this particular case. make that point. >> my point is -- >> to go back to the '90s about the clintons, bill clinton was not surrounding himself with vulgar attorneys. >> i'm citing the last guy who got impeached as president as a precedent for some similarities here. i'm not trying to detract from donald trump's sins. >> okay. >> it was a good try, though, matt. that's okay. >> he was. >> depends on what your
definition of "is" is. >> there you go. >> or is not is. i want to play president trump's awkward meeting with the french president's wife. watch this. alice? we've had this -- have we had this conversation before? was that appropriate? >> yeah, i think it's like groundhog day i think with the inappropriate comments by the president. look, i'll say, that is his nature. i don't see that as one of the more gross comments that he's made in the past, but it is something that normally you wouldn't say in a situation like that, but that's part of his nature. i don't -- i'm not going to beat him up over that. i think he was being good natured. i think he was being complimentary. and while it's awkward, i'm sure, for her, that's part of his nature. >> i wonder if melania, governor, would have walked up to president macron and said,
wow, you're in good shape. >> yeah, you got a good body. >> yeah, you got a good body. >> first of all, i don't think you can flip it and say it's the same thing in terms of men and women. >> yeah. >> his comments are out of the '50s, right? this is not "mad men." i would say, i agree with alice, i do think that's sort of who he is. i'm sure he was thinking he was being complimentary. let me just say to everybody, right here and now, women do not want to be judged upon having a -- how their physical attributes are in a professional setting. it's one thing if you're dating somebody and if he's trying to hit on her, i don't think he was, that would be a different thing and really inappropriate. but this is not the place or the time for that kind of thing, ever, in a work setting, certainly on the presidential stage. guys, do not comment on a woman's body. comment on what's happening. this is not the definition of bilateral relations, i think, that he was looking for. >> i'm looking at you, matt. are you sure you want to get in
on this? >> when you're the president, they let you get away with that. >> no, he said when you're a star. >> when you're -- you can say whatever you want. >> you can say -- you can grab them by the you know what. >> i think he's technically a dirty old man by the old -- by standards what we would maybe used to consider, but i think this is his nature. i think he likes -- he likes the ladies. i think it's obviously wildly out of fashion. >> it's different than he likes the ladies, but that's -- he can't help himself and that's not a good thing. he can't help himself. >> embarrassing. >> i want to go back to -- >> he can't help himself for lying. he's embarrassing. >> are you going to go back to bill clinton? >> i don't want to compare him to any past presidents who might have had those proclivities. >> all right, matt. we'll be right back. radio: scorching heat today, stay cool out there!
support it. is this bill dead on arrival? >> if they stick to their guns, it is. they can't afford to lose anymore. they're going to need mike pence, the vice president to cast the deciding vote. i think one of the interesting things is the house bill of course died the first time and then they had all these amendments and they basically were able to pass it in the house. now the question is this going to happen again in the senate? they're not going to be ibl to fix it through the amendment process but can they fix it politically? my bet is this will not pass. but i think it's very, very much on the bubble right now. >> alice, my behind the scenes republican whisperer, do they really want this bill to pass given how controversial it is? >> they do want a bill to pass that repeals and are eplaces obamacare, whether it's this
version or one after they've continued negotiations. they've come a long way from the original bill that was first introduced in the senate. senator cruz offers more choices is important. there's also the new amendment with the cassidy amendment that senator santorum has been working with them on. that is a good idea and it return lautz of the money back to the states and works with gop governors and getting gop governors on board will go a long way to getting the senators getting them to yes. but right now we have three confirmed noes and that's not going to cut it. >> let's tell people what's in the bill and how it differs. it includes more health to cover out of pocket expenses, adds $45 billion to fight opioid
epidemic, but maintains significant cuts to medicaid. does this increase the chances of republicans getting the bill passed? >> as you know if you help one side of the republican contingent, you're going to hurt the other side. so the fact that they're not going to repeal the tax cut is going to get the conservatives all up in arms. the fact they're adding money for ope oyoids, is going to get the more moderates up in arms. i'm not sure when they're going to get this. they cannot come together with a package as good as obamacare has been and to -- i mean you don't even have to call it obamacare. you can repackage it as john boehner said. let's shore up the markets, keep
the medication expangsion and let's just make sure the markets are strong. that's what has to happen but they continue to beat their head against a wall. >> when you send your emails and tweets, it was matt lewis a republican who uttered the words, dirty old man. not us. thank you all. radio: scorching heat today, stay cool out there! [ barks ] walter! stop suffering with hot ac. cool it yourself with a/c pro. in just 3 easy steps, enjoy the comfort of 2 times the cooling boosters from the #1 selling coldest air. nothing cools like a/c pro.
no, please, please, oh! ♪ (shrieks in terror) (heavy breathing and snorting) no, no. the running of the bulldogs? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money aleia saved by switching to geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. you're not taking these. hey, hey, hey! you're not taking those. whoa, whoa! you're not taking that. come with me. you're not taking that. you're not taking that. you're not taking that. mom, i'm taking the subaru.
don't be late. even when we're not there to keep them safe, our subaru outback will be. (vo) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. in los angeles hundreds of at-risk youth look to one to help find the right path. they come from foster care, many are high school dropouts. the man they connect with can relate. he spent five years on juvenile probation. and he's this week's cnn hero. >> bottom line we got a story to tell. tell the world about who you are. i want to see what you have inside of you that wants to come out. ♪ go and tell them your struggle ♪ >> we need to listen to our young people. we need to find out what it is
that they're longing for, what they want. >> to find out how harry transforms the lives of these young people, you can watch his story right now on cnn heroes.com. and nominate someone you think should be a hero. white house in crisis is next. ♪ this is cnn breaking news. >> this is a cnn special report. "white house in crisis." breaking tonight. top white house aids now at risk of being dragged into the special counsel's investigation. >> they've been exposed to scrutiny for what they may have known about donald trump jr.'s meeting with a russian lawyer and for the incomplete and changing explanations of what went on. >> here's what we know at this hour. right now we're getting new details on how the white house strug tooled manage the disclosure of emails setting up