tv CNN Newsroom With Ana Cabrera CNN July 22, 2017 1:00pm-2:00pm PDT
creature out on the wing. the episode was entitled "nightmare at 20,000 feet" and a nightmare of two feet is the sequel. well, thank you very much. nice of you to do this. jeanne moos, new york. >> top of the hour now. you're in the "cnn newsroom." thanks for spending part of your weekend with us. i want to get to the new action from congress for punishing moscow. they reached a deal just today that if passed would give congress unprecedented ability to block the trump administration from easing any sanctions on russia. this as we get a stunning report on attorney general jeff sessions' pre-election meeting with russian ambassador sergey kislyak. kislyak told his moscow bosses that he and sessions did in fact talk about campaign related matters including trump's
position on policy issues important to russia. this directly contradicts how sessions described the conversation and it's the latest in what has been a rough week for sessions. the highest law enforcement official in the land. just days ago, president trump revealed his major disappointment with sessions. take a listen. >> zero. so jeff sessions cams the job -- takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself. i then have -- which frankly, i think is very unfair to the president. how do you take a job and then recuse yourself? if he would have recused himself before the job, i would have said, thanks, jeff i'm not going to take you. it's extremely unfair to the president. >> i want to bring in caitlyn collins. talk to me about how the president is reacting to this new report on sessions.
>> reporter: well, good afternoon, ana. unsurprisingly the president is tweeting about jeff sessions in this report that came out yesterday from "the washington post." let's take a look what the president said this morning about jeff sessions. he said, a new intelligence leak from the amateur "washington post." this time against attorney general jeff sessions. these illegal leaks like comey's must stop. you see the president is not denying the substance of the report through his tweet. instead he's saying that the problem here is the leaks coming out of this and the leaks from this. "the washington post" is reporting that the russian ambassador told his superiors back in russia he did discuss the trump campaign last year and that was picked up from u.s. intel that contradicts what jeff sessions what are saying all along which is that he discussed nothing related to the trump campaign when he met with him and that meeting was only because he was a u.s. senator. now, all of this comes as the
president like you said publicly trashed jeff sessions during that interview with "the new york times" where he said that if he had known he was going to recuse himself, he would not have selected him as his attorney general. now, these comments are having a chilling effect on some staffers in the west wing. they're questioning the president's loyalty to them and they say that the thinking goes if the president can do this to jeff sessions, he can do it to anybody. >> and we know that sessions is standing business original testimony there in front of the senate committee. the white house pushing back on reports that aides are researching the ins and outs of presidential pardons. what more are you learning? >> reporter: yeah, so "the washington post" reported this week that trump lawyers and aides have been discussing his ability to pardon people with the president this week. they say it's from more of a curious standpoint and he wants to know just how far he can pardon someone and what his -- what his limits are with this. and not that he's considering using it. but the president seemed to back
that reporting up today when he tweeted again about pardons. let's look at that. he said while i'll agree that the u.s. president has the complete power to pardon why think of that when only crime so far is leaks against us? fake news. now, this is the most notable of all of the president's tweets this morning. it shows that he knows that he has this power and he's willing to assert it and he's leaving that option on the table. but trump lawyer in jay sekulow say that pardons are not being considered at this time. ana? >> caitlyn collins, thank you. let's get reaction from russia now. cnn international correspondent phil black is joining us live from moscow. let's start with this new sanctions bill that we hear is going to pass -- expected to pass the full congress, that would tie the white house's hands when its comes to rolling back sanctions or giving moscows back the compounds they have been after here here. what is the kremlin saying about this? >> reporter: well, when we
reached out to the kremlin's spokesperson about what the russian view of the new sanctions is he responded with two words -- quite negatively. that's the russian view and that is really a powerful understatement at this stage. it is no secret that russia really doesn't like sanctions. it resents them. it's talked about this in the past when there have been -- when they have been applied. they see it as an attack on their own sovereignty, on the stability of the government here. the foreign policy in many ways in recent years has been about trying to get sanctions lifted. taken away like the sanctions that were put in place by the united states. by the european union in response to russia's actions in ukraine. now, it's looking at the possibility of further sanctions. it is likely that russia would retaliate in some way. the key question is how, because russia's ability to hurt the united states financially is pretty limited. and so that's why in these sort of circumstances before, russian officials have talked about an asymmetrical response. they talk about taking an
unexpected angle, going after the u.s. in some other way that's still designed to inflict pain or inconvenience upon america, its businesses or its citizens. if you remember the ban on russian adoptions by american families, that was such a response. an extraordinary response to a piece of legislation passed by the american congress which punished russian human rights abuses. that's what they mean by asymmetrical. so it gives a real sense that russia can respond in almost any way in response to any further sanctions that are applied. >> real quick with you, phil. any response from russia or comment regarding this report by "the washington post" and the conversation that was apparently intercepted with kislyak and his superiors back in russia talking about what he discussed with the attorney general jeff sessions? >> reporter: nothing specific to this particular news story from "the washington post," no. but of course kislyak's name has been mentioned in previous
stories involving jeff sessions and other members of the trump campaign team and so forth. and in those circumstances, russia has always pushed back very strongly against the suggestion that kislyak was doing anything other than being a professional diplomat and ambassador for russia. they have always insisted that he's played no role in anything that was any way contrary to that, ana. >> phil black, thank you. i want to bring in the panel now. joining us cnn crime and justice reporter, "time" magazine contributor and a former homeland security assistant secretary, juliet cayenne. the suggestion that sessions had talked about a possible future trump administration and russian policy issues with the russian ambassador this is according to the intercepted conversation he had with the superiors back in moscow. is it possible kislyak was overexaggerating to impress his bosses and he knew that the
calls were being recorded and wanted to sow discord? >> i think it's healthy to be skeptical about the intercept. i want to say for the record, a single intercept of a conversation in a foreign country really did violate some of the crown jewels of surveillance and intelligence gathering that we have. nonetheless, what kislyak is saying about what happened is his interpretation about what happened and so i am not sort of breathless about these disclosures at this stage. at most, they show that sessions, you know, either forgot or possibly said something about the campaign. they don't show the kind of collusion that i think people were hoping for. if anything, they show that sessions as a lead in the campaign was making overtures to kislyak on behalf of trump and
so in this way i actually think it hurts trump and the white house more than sessions. >> whether kislyak is telling the truth or not in the intercept, it can't be good for sessions politically. >> absolutely not. and this comes right on the heels of the president really harshly criticizing jeff sessions this week saying he would not have kept him or -- or in fact wouldn't have offered him the job of ag if he had known that he was going to recuse himself from the russia investigation. and yet, these intercepts if true actually do show that he should have actually definitely should have recused himself from the russia investigation because he was so intimately tied to it and is one of the central figures of it. so it really is yet another sort of nail in jeff sessions' coffin to some degree in his relationship with donald trump and this week jeff sessions would not step down and he would stay on as long as the president saw fit. >> jay, i want to ask you about this new development, this russia sanctions bill.
slapping new sanctions on russia and more importantly perhaps make it harder for president trump to lift the sanctions. interesting it's so bipartisan here. the white house took issue with this bill limiting their negotiating powers. are republicans sending a message now to this administration on the issue of russia? >> absolutely. this is such a slap in the face to the administration. the president had been pushing -- since taking office to have much more flexibility in the imposition of these sanctions to be allowed to have a lot less oversight from congress on these sanctions. the fact that congress is passing them with these very strict conditions that really monitors very closely how much -- what the president is doing and how the president is enforcing the sanctions on russia is -- it makes it really hard for the president to have any wiggle room. he basically has to do what congress is telling him to do. and by the fact that they're marrying the russian sanctions to sanctions on iran and
sanctions on north korea makes it hard for the president to veto the sanctions and then tripling that, the idea that it's being passed in the house this week. under special rules that will require a two-thirds majority which means that it will pass in the veto proof majority telling the president even if you veto this bill we're still able to override you. >> shimon, joining us from aspen. we learned that robert mueller has instructed the white house staff to preserve all documents related to the don jr. meeting so does this confirm that mueller is looking into this meeting as part of his investigation into collusion? >> yeah, that's right. it certainly does. why else would he send that letter? it seems this has become part of his investigation, whether or not he's actually investigating don jr. or if this is more focused on what the russians were trying to do. you know, i don't think we're at place that we can say that. clearly, this meeting is now part of anything that bob
mueller the special counsel and the fbi is now is looking into, as well as, you know, the intercepts that supposedly captured kislyak. that is all part of the so-called russia meddling investigation and what the russians here were trying to do with folks attached to the trump organization, to the trump world. and, you know, the meetings that just came to light last week with don jr. and paul manafort and kushner are certainly now part of this investigation. certainly they want to know, you know, was this something set up by someone up high in russia, someone in the kremlin, who said, hey, you know, go there and see if they'd be willing to accept it. you know, at the security council here yesterday, clapper, the former head of the dni sort of talked about this. how sometimes in these situations what russians do is they sort of use soft tactics to see if someone will be receptive to their help and, you know, it
is his belief that's what this meeting was about. >> they were just testing the waters a little bit. julia, there are reports that the president had asked his attorneys about pardoning powers. you saw this coming. we were talking about this off line last week, and president trump appeared to confirm that they have talked about pardoning, tweeting today while i'll agree that the u.s. president has the complete power to pardon why think of that when only crime so far is leaks against us? fake news. so here we are six months into the presidency. two months into the special counsel investigation. is it concerning to you that the president is already talking even just talking about pardons? >> well, of course it is because it means that obviously he feels the heat from these various investigations not just mueller but of course the senate and house investigations. they are at the door of the oval office so to speak.
we don't know the theory of the case yet. does this have to do with the financial dealings or the direct collusion, which the meeting that we learned about last week may have -- may shed some light on it. i will say just as a legal matter how sort of -- i think you're going to hear a lot of lawyers debating this issue. can the president have unconditional power to pardon? i'm a lawyer but i'm doing to add some common sense into this. basically trump's tweet suggests he could shoot someone on fifth avenue or the groping woman scenario, he could do those things and then just pardon himself. no rational person would think not only is that the appropriate use of the presidency, but certainly the legal meaning of the pardoning power. so you're going to hear lots of lawyers debating this and i think what you're seeing from trump and his team is what we call, you know, they're greasing the runway. they're criticizing mueller. raising the pardon power because
they're going after this investigation because they don't want it to go forward. teir options are getting limited at this stage. someone may be talking. the investigators may have turned someone and so this is -- we're in a very, very compressed time frame right now. >> just quickly, julia, you wrote an op-ed regarding pardoning and it could be totally disastrous but the bigger concern is national security if he were to pardon somebody related to this russia investigation. >> right. so the collusion issue -- imagine if he pardoned people who were at least being investigated for collusion of russia, what will that say to russia? it's essentially come hither, for 2018 or 2020. and say that to china and to iran, and maybe even to our allies that they can try to influence our elections. either through direct contact with a campaign or even as we saw with russia through the cyber manipulation of information without any recourse.
i mean, if you're russia, there's been nothing -- nothing that this president has done to make them feel that 2018 is going to be any different. i think any pardon will make them feel not only that they're forgiven, but they're emboldened at this stage. >> all right. i had more questions, but not enough time. we'll have you all back. thanks. a programming note, anthony scaramucci the president's new communications director will be joining jake tapper tomorrow as a guest on "cnn's state of the union." that's at 9:00 a.m. eastern. initially donald trump jr. said that meeting in trump tower with the russian lawyer was just about adoptions. although we know the conversation moved to politics. we'll hear why one u.s. business man says when russians want to talk adoptions they really mean sanctions. this is a big deal. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." in our house, we go through a lot of toilet paper.
i'm leaving you, wesley. but why? you haven't noticed me in two years. i was in a coma. well, i still deserve appreciation. who was there for you when you had amnesia? you know i can't remember that. stop this madness. if it's appreciation you want you should both get snapshot from progressive. it rewards good drivers with big discounts on car insurance. i have news. i've used most of our cellular data.
investigation. why do we keep hearing so much about russian adoptions? remember initially donald trump jr. said he met with the russian lawyer mainly to talk about russian adoptions? and then even president trump said he discussed adoptions with russian president vladimir putin at the g20 summit. my next guest american businessman bill browder says the conversation about russian adoptions is really about sanctions. now, years ago he made a lot of money as a hedge fund manager and the top foreign investor in russia. take a look, sergei magnitsky uncovered a massive scheme and he was arrested and died in a moscow prison. and he pushed congress to pass the magnitsky act which led to russian banning -- russia banning russian adoptions by
those in the u.s. that russian lawyer, natal veselnitskaya who met with donald trump jr. and jared kushner and paul manafort she wants it lifted. you say the magnitsky act as a topic of conversation isn't so innocent in fact as people may seem to believe. you believe it's putin's number one priority to get the u.s. to lift those sanctions under the act. explain. >> so sergei magnitsky as you mentioned was my lawyer. he uncovered a massive government corruption scheme of $230 million stolen from the russian government. vladimir putin was one of the beneficiaries of that theft. when magnitsky exposed the crime, he was subsequently arrested, put in pretrial detention, tortured for 358 days and murdered in prison by
russian guards at the age of 37. 7 1/2 years ago. i have made it my life's mission since then to go after the people who killed him to make sure they face justice. that's where we ended up with the magnitsky act which is an act of congress that was passed in 2012 which imposes visa sanctions and asset freezes on the people who killed sergei and the people who do similar types of things in russia. putin is very afraid his money and he's got lots of it will be eventually seized under the magnitsky act which is why he's so interested in having it repealed. >> so this is all about putin's personal finances is what you're saying. trump we know and putin talked for about an hour or so at that g20 dinner. this was a previously undisclosed conversation they had. the trump administration has said it was just small talk, it was at a dinner, but we have learned it was an hour long and president trump admits they discussed adoptions. he said that in a sense that it was no big deal. do you think that putin was working him on the magnitsky act
in that conversation? >> well, so the deal that they're trying to do here is putin -- so after the magnitsky act was passed, putin tried to come up with the most vicious thing he could do and so what he did was he banned the adoption of russian orphans by american families. and these were not healthy orphans. the russians didn't allow healthy ones to be adopted just the sick ones with hiv, down's syndrome, et cetera. so he basically -- these kids were being brought to america and nursed back to health. he was basically effectively taking these children hostage. this discussion about adoptions is not a discussion about adoptions. this is a hostage situation in which putin has taken his own orphans hostage in order to try to get america to back off the sanctioning of torturers and murderers out of russia. >> adoption conversation equals conversation specifically about
sanctions. >> it's a conversation about easing up on crooks coming out of russia so that they can spend their money freely an not worry about it being frozen. nobody -- the russians do not care about the orphans or adoptions. we do, but they don't. they care about their ill gotten gains. their corruption. the money they killed people for. >> how risky was it for president trump to have that conversation with putin, with not even a translator to witness the discussion? >> i think it's very risky for anybody to have a conversation with vladimir putin. this guy is a spy, a kgb spy. he's trained his whole life for all of these types of situations. he spends hours and hours studying his targets. and i'm afraid whether it's trump or obama or bush, all of these people are no match for vladimir putin standing by themselves. and they all need the expertise
of people who know vladimir putin and have spent as much time studying him as he spends studying his targets like trump and others. >> i want to ask you about your one-time foe russian lawyer veselnitskaya. she once represented the russia's spy agency as one of her clients in fact on a land rights issue. she's the lawyer who met with donald trump jr. back in 2016 when she says she doesn't work for the kremlin, she isn't connected to putin. what's your reaction though? >> well, it's a complete and utter lie. she works for -- her main client, the person who's paying the bills in america for all of the lobbyists that got her to trump tower and other places is a senior russian government official. he's one of the top guys in the putin regime. and all you have to do is connect those dots and then you start connecting more dots. it becomes obvious that her activities in america were to repeal the magnitsky act which is something that is on the top of putin's agenda.
it's a complete and utter nonsense to say she's a private lawyer just meeting on her own volition. it's just not true. >> bill, given how connected and how much knowledge you have of the inner workings in russia what's your assessment of how president trump has handled russia so far? what has he done right or wrong in terms of u.s./russian relations? >> well, what he's done right he's assembled one of the strongest national security teams to deal with russia. the defense secretary mattis knows what's going on in russia. the head of the cia knows exactly, nikki haley from the ambassador to the u.n. knows exactly. the team he's put together i was absolutely checking the boxes and applauding each one as they were appointed. and in terms of what's happening now, the answer is that as of now, as of this minute, there has not been any ease up on russia in terms of sanctions.
and just this afternoon "the new york times" published a story saying that congress has approved the sanctions -- the russian sanctions law which is foolproof and devastating. so i'm -- i'm obviously worried when i hear donald trump talking about putin as a good guy. i find that offensive knowing what i know about vladimir putin but so far the u.s. policy towards russia has not changed. i hope it remains that way. >> bill browder, thanks for joining us. >> thank you. coming up, it was a seemingly early victory for then president-elect trump. he cut a deal to stop carrier jobs from going to mexico, but 600 are headed out the door. we hear from former workers next. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." whoooo.
we now instantly compare prices from over 200 booking sites... ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. go on, try something fresh. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. when you think what comes to mind? your next getaway? connecting with family and friends? a big night out? or maybe your everyday shopping.
who knew that phones would starentertaining us,ng? getting us back on track and finding us dates. phones really have changed. so why hasn't the way we pay for them? introducing xfinity mobile. you only pay for data and can easily switch between pay per gig and unlimited. no one else lets you do that. see how much you can save when you choose by the gig or unlimited. call or go to xfinitymobile.com. xfinity mobile. it's a new kind of network, designed to save you money. the carrier plant in
indianapolis that became a focal point of president trump's rallying cry to save jobs is back in the news again. publicly they agreed to keep 800 mexico bound jobs at the plant, but what was not touted some 600 other jobs that would be on the chopping block. as martin savage shows us that layoffs began this week. >> reporter: at the indianapolis factory once the center of donald trump's campaign pledge to save american jobs, they've begun laying off hundreds of employees. >> everybody cried. it was depressing. and it's still depressing. it's still depressing. because a lot of people can't figure out what they'll do next. >> reporter: last december, just a month after winning office, trump seemed to score an early victory, negotiating a deal with carrier to keep this plant open and stop 1,400 jobs from moving to mexico as they had announced. >> i will tell you that united
technologies and carrier stepped it up and now they're keeping -- actually the number is over 1,100 people which is so great. which is so great. >> reporter: carrier got $7 million worth of incentives from the state of indiana. it was a win-win for workers and the negotiator in chief. so what went wrong? in a word, nothing. is this plan the layoffs, is it all working out the way it was supposed to work out? >> yes. >> reporter: robert james is president of the union representing carrier workers. he says trump's deal did save about 800 manufacturing jobs but its had some painful fine print allowing carrier to lay off more than 600 workers. something the president didn't mention in december. but that goes into effect this week. it's just now the painful part starts. >> this is where the reality of it sets in for the employees
that are leaving. >> reporter: this was jerry robinson's last day after 15 years. she's among the first 300 workers to go. >> this came at a bad time. and i -- i wish love to everybody who's -- who lost their job. >> reporter: carrier will lay off another 300 in december. susan wallins has a different outlook, leaving after 39 years. >> we're all excited. >> reporter: she credits trump with saving the plant and volunteered to leave. did you accept the deal in part with the hopes that it would save a younger person's job? >> yeah. oh, yeah. >> reporter: candidate trump won support by bashing companies for moving overseas. when carrier announced it was moving to mexico trump turned the company into a rallying cry. >> carrier. carrier. carrier. >> reporter: blue collar votes in swing states helped trump win. overall for the working man, do
you think the president has lived up to the promises he made? >> no, not at all. not at all. you know, we're working class people. we're no longer middle class and i don't see anything that he's advocating or done that benefits the working class people. >> reporter: former union leader chuck jones said trump's promises to blue collar workers now seem like the carrier deal. both sounded a lot better six months ago. as part of the deal, carrier says it's committed to spending millions and millions of dollars for improvements at its factory here which is a good thing. however, the company's implied that a lot of the money will go to automation which tends to replace jobs. not create them. martin savage, cnn, indianapolis. >> thanks. coming up, one florida police chief said he's going to recommend charges against teenagers who taunted and laughed at drowning man who died. details next.
e moderate to sevee ulcerative colitis, the unpredictability of a flare may weigh on your mind. thinking about what to avoid, where to go, and how to work around your uc. that's how i thought it had to be. but then i talked to my doctor about humira, and learned humira can help get and keep uc under control... when certain medications haven't worked well enough. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. raise your expectations and ask your gastroenterologist if humira may be right for you. with humira, control is possible.
you give us comfort. and we give you bare feet... i love you, couch. ...backsweat and gordo's everything. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze fabric refresher with odorclear technology... ...cleans away odors like never before. because the things you love the most can stink. and plug in febreze to keep your whole room fresh for up... ...to 45 days. breathe happy with new febreze.
(woman vo) to refinance? time (man vo) yes! mortgage rates just plummeted. the time to refinance your home is right now. get started at lendingtree dot com. the only place you can compare up to five real offers side by side, for free. our average customer saves $20,000. quick. beat the fed's 2017 rate hike. do not miss this window. are you sure you have the best rate? it only takes 3 minutes to find out. go to lendingtree dot com right now.
[woman] we did it. [man] we're campers. look at us. look at us. it's so nice to get out of the city. it's so... quiet. is it, too quiet? it's awful. yeah. feel at home, pretty much wherever you are. t-mobile is america's best unlimited network. when you switch to progressive. as easy as saving $600 winds stirring. too treacherous for a selfie. [ camera shutter clicks ] sure, i've taken discounts to new heights with safe driver and paperless billing. but the prize at the top is worth every last breath. here we go. [ grunts ] got 'em. ahh. wait a minute. whole wheat waffles? [ crying ] why!
now to florida where police are recommending charges for five teenagers who videotaped a man drowning. and then stood there, laughing and joking. they never intervened. they didn't call 911. nobody was able to help this man. cnn's nick valencia has the story. we want to warn you, its contains disturbing video. nick? >> reporter: ana this week detectives with the coco police department interviewed the teens. during questioning not only did they show no remorse, but police say at least one of them smirked when talking about the video. they say they were in the area smoking weed when they saw dunn get into the pond. the video you're about to watch is disturbing. >> get out of the water, you're gonna die. >> reporter: a blatant disregard for human life. >> we're not going to help your [ bleep ]. shouldn't have got in. >> reporter: a group of florida teens taunt a drowning man while
filming his final moments from afar. >> ain't nobody going to help you. >> reporter: in the two minute long video clip the five boys between 14 and 16 could be heard laughing as he struggles to stay afloat in a pond in coco, florida. rather than call for help the teens recorded the incident on cell phone. chuckling while they watched the man die. they say this when the man goes under water and doesn't resurface. >> he just died. >> [ bleep ]. >> reporter: the state of florida currently does not have a law where a citizen is obligated to render aid to anyone in distress or call for help. both coco police and the state attorney office are frustrated that no one can be held accountable in this incident. we are deeply saddened and shocked at both the manner in which mr. dunn lost his life and the actions of the witnesses to this tragedy. we can find no moral justification for the behavior of the persons heard on the recording or the deliberate decision not to render aid to mr. dunn.
the victim, 31-year-old jamel dunn got into an argument with his mom and possibly his fiancee and ten minutes after the fight was over, police say dunn scaled a fence and walked into the water. his family reported him missing three days later. the teens stayed quiet about what they saw so police didn't know where to look. dunn's body wasn't discovered until five days after his death. >> i feel like something should be done. >> reporter: the victim's sister posted the video of the drowning on facebook and she questioned their humanity. >> they can watch somebody die in front of their lives and imagine what they'll do when they're older. imagine how they'll be where they're older. >> reporter: the teens waited a few days before they posted the video online. in fact, the sister of the victim first saw the video posted last saturday on facebook. she told me that she is disgusted and angry that nothing is being done. we did reach out to the state's
attorney's office and though they tell us there's no law on the books that requires a citizen to call if someone else is in distress they're reviewing this specific case to see if any charges can be brought forward. >> so disturbing. thank you. coming up, i travelled to a town just 20 miles from the nation's capital that is fighting back over a proposed fifth power plant within just 15 miles. why the community there is so divided, next. u know, geico juse hundreds of dollars on my car insurance. huh. i should take a closer look at geico... (dog panting) geico has a 97% customer satisfaction rating! and fast and friendly claims service. speaking of service? oooo, just out. it was in. out. in! out. in! what about now? that was our only shuttlecock. take a closer look at geico. great savings. and a whole lot more.
has brandy questioning her family's future in brandy wine. she's worried about their surroundings. st. charles just opened in march. across the county line keys energy is under construction and a mile and a half from there the plot for the newest approved plant. the state put out a call for these companies citing a need for more energy. brandy wine was picked because of zoning and existing infrastructure. this is the river keeper. he is concerned about pollution. >> airways, waterways. >> reporter: two other facilities have been operating in the area for decades. another natural gas plant and the chock point generating station that includes gas, oil and coal. it was fined $1 million last year for failure to meet federal and environmental standards. eight of the last 12 quarters. >> i think this community has
lacked power by power i don't mean electricity. i mean political power. >> reporter: he calls it environmental injustice. brandy wine is 72% african-american. last year, residents niled a fed -- filed a federal civil rights complaint against those who approved the latest power plant. it hasn't been built yet. they say the plant is disproportionately subjecting the black residents to air pollution and other negative impacts based on their race. when asked about it, the state declined to comment because of the pending federal complaint. >> it's dumping ground. >> reporter: beyond the power plants tucked behind trees and lush foliage, brandy wine has a super fund site. meaning land is contaminate and designated for clean-up and there are several mining operations an a coal ash landfill next to this playground. a doctor, an associate proffer
at the university of maryland, warns of the combined effect of contaminants from ozone emissions to particulate matter. >> those are small particles that get in your lungs and into your circulatory system. these risks are really -- when you think of children, pregnant women, someone who is elderly. these communities are vulnerable. >> respiratory problems are the number one cause for visits in the county. air quality for the region has been improving in the past couple of years, and the two power plants that responded to cnn's request for comment insist that their plants are far cleaner than the old oil and coal plants. >> there goes another dumper. i mean, they're flying up and down all the time. >> reporter: paul's window screen business will have a power plant just across the road. you're not worried about the health impact? >> no, it's natural gas which is the least offensive of the fossil fuels.
its burns clean. and there's an overabundance in america of that. >> reporter: having grown up in the shadow of the chock point flatd -- >> that's to the back of you. >> reporter: antonio hopes it leads to cheaper electricity with one of them generating enough energy to generate 650,000 homes and infusing millions of dollars into county coffers. >> the power plants are probably going to be in top five largest taxpayers of prince georges county. they will add to our commercial tax base which helps us fund education, public safety. transportation. >> reporter: the plants are also creating jobs. cpv for example hired 400 construction workers. but those jobs are temporary. it now has 22 full-time employees. for john rousseau who owns a new york style deli that means more customers. >> brought a lot of business to the neighborhood. >> it brings more foot traffic
in here. >> at least 5% extra. >> mostly from the power plant? >> the power plant. the parties that they have. you know, they're buying food from us, other places around here. >> reporter: and rousseau hopes that's just the beginning. for now, the fate of at least one plant remains uncertain. with the federal continue blame in mediation that could take weeks or even months to resolve. the ultimate impact on the region may not be determined for years. forcing some in the community to make tough choices. >> you know, i just feel for the health of my child. that's all i care about at this point. >> is it enough to make you want to move? >> absolutely. for the health of my child i will. >> even after living here most of your life. >> i will pick up and move for my kid. it's just not worth it. >> the plans for these new power plants came long before the current administration. they have been in the works for years really and a lot of the residents we talked to there at
brandy wine said they had no idea that the plants had been proposed let alone approved. what happens when deep cover russian spies infiltrate the u.s. and appear to be living normal lives? the fbi responds by launching operation ghost stories and that's featured in the season two premiere of declassified with mike rogers. >> for a country that wants to be a superpower again intelligence can be the most important kind of power. >> so that's why it is important for the united states to be aware of what they're up to so that we can anticipate their actions and take steps to protect our country. there are various ways the russians develop effective spies. they deploy people to this country under a diplomatic
passport. a russian diplomat or diplomats for that matter come into our country and are located at the various embassies. some of them are spies. >> aren't all diplomats spies? >> no. the diplomatic service of any country including the diplomatic service of the united states serves an important function. it's for countries to be able to communicate and interact with each other. however, some of them are spying. >> again, the season two premiere of declassified tonight right here on cnn. we're back after this.
so how old do you want uhh, i was thinking around 70. alright, and before that? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? oh yeah sure... ok, like what? but i thought we were supposed to be talking about investing for retirement? we're absolutely doing that.