Skip to main content

tv   CNN Tonight With Don Lemon  CNN  July 25, 2017 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT

7:00 pm
xfinity gives you more to stream to more screens. that's all the time we have. time to hand things over to don lemon for cnn tonight. i'll see you tomorrow. president trump tells a cheering crowd in ohio this. >> with the exception of the late great abraham lincoln, i can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office. that i can tell you. >> this is cnn. sorry, i'm don lemon. how presidential is he really. >> reporter: president trump
7:01 pm
starting his day at the crack of dawn where else? on twitter. targeting? attorney general jeff sessions "ukrainian efforts to sab bo taj trump campaign quietly working to investigate clinton. where is the investigation, ag? then attorney general sessions has taken a weak president on hillary clinton crimes? mr. president, those e-mails and the servers did hillary clinton no favors during the election. she lost in part because of that. you won. we all know that. we've moved on. shouldn't you? then in an interview with the "wall street journal," the president downplayed then senator sessions' valuable early endorse the saying it was really all about the crowd size. here's a quote. "he was a senator. he looks at 40,000 people and he probably says what do i have to lose? and he endorsed me." here's the truth. sessions' endorsement came at a critical time two days before super tuesday in the republican primary when candidate trump was being hammered by ted cruz and
7:02 pm
marco rubio. >> we need to make america great again. i am pleased to endorse donald trump for the presidency of the united states. >> that was then, this is now. "so it's not like a great loyal thing about the endorsement, but i'm very disappointed in jeff sessions. and just in case people weren't getting the point, this during a joint press conference from the rose garden when a reporter asked why sessions is left twisting in the wind. >> thank you very much. well, i don't think i am doing that but i am disappointed in the attorney general. he should not have recused himself. almost immediately after he took office. and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me
7:03 pm
prior taking office. and i would have quite simply picked somebody else. so i think that's a bad thing, not for the president but for the presidency. i think it's unfair to the presidency. and that's the way i feel. >> mr. president, this isn't a good thing for the presidency either. neither is it for the country. the attorney general is the american people's chief law enforcement officer. the people's chief law enforcement officer. he's got a job to do. he's not there to be bullied into quitting because you don't like that he did the right thing, followed the rules and recused himself from the russia investigation. serving in washington, serving the american people is not about settling personal grievances. it's about doing the right thing even when it's hard. that's actually what jeff sessions did when he recused himself back in march and what another one of your former targets about did just today. you know the one you said wasn't a real war hero when he was
7:04 pm
captured but you called him brave when you got the vote you needed to move at bill forward. senator john mccain walking out onto the senate floor against doctor's orders just 11 days after brain surgery casting his crucial vote on health care and bringing a message for his colleagues in washington. >> i hope we can again rely on humility on our need to cooperate, on our dependence on each other to, learn how to trust each other again and by so doing better serve the people who elected us. >> that's a true american hero. captured or not. a real american hero. now i want to bring in political director david chalian and legal analyst laura coats. david, you first. another extraordinary day in politics. who is more allies right now, president trump or attorney general jeff sessions? >> if you look at the statements of support that sessions has been receiving from former colleagues in the senate, none
7:05 pm
of them are not supporting is donald trump. he can probably -- they can probably count on the same people as both their supporters. what i find interesting is you have senators like thom tillis of north carolina or mitch mcconnell, the majority leader in the united states senate not only saying what a lot of senators are saying that jeff sessions is a man of integrity that he's a good guy and look forward to still working with him as ag but they go as far as to say that he was right to recuse himself which is what rudy guiliani also told cnn yesterday. so donald trump is on a bit of an island at this point in terms of thinking that jeff sessions was wrong-headed in recusing himself. that is -- that gets to the fundamental concern about what the president was tweeting about this morning, don, because he clearly, if you read his tweets as you just did, he clearly doesn't see the attorney general as a position that should have independence from him and fewer
7:06 pm
fealty to the rule of law. he sees it as somebody who serves at the pleasure of the president who should be doing the bidding of political protection and legal protection of the president of the united states. >> interesting. in private business, yes, but not as president of the united states. laura, this president before he was president, he koibed the phrase love to say you're fired. if he is so disappointed in jeff sessions, why doesn't he just fire him? >> it's a very simple reason, don, because he doesn't have the leverage that he needs to do so. remember, it's very different than firing someone like james comey or firing michael flynn. neither of whom had the support of other senators but also you have the idea when you fired james comey, there there was a nebulous cloud why did he so. was it because he usurped the role of the then attorney general when he held a press conference condemning hillary clinton but saying she should not be ultimately prosecuted?
7:07 pm
rod rosenstein and jeff sessions came forward to say that was incomplete insub audio nation that justifies the firing of comey. so you have the escape route for the president of the united states saying i was simply trying to ensure that the head investigator of the united states is actually somebody who won't be unsubordinate. now jeff sessions enters the arena and you have a clear interview with the "new york times" on tape in an audiotape confirming that he is dismayed to say the least that he will not drop this russian investigation and is not overseeing it in a way that he could effectuate any type of change. now the cloud is gone and now the only person in washington, d.c. who is a political appointee to have leverage over the president of the united states is the one man who can make him call his bluff and that's jeff sessions. if i were jeff sessions i would said to the president, if you want to fire me, go ahead. but you invite obstruction of justice charges almost immediately. >> now just think, david, if
7:08 pm
you're a republican lawmaker in washington and many of whom are not trump loyalists but did end up supporting him because he's a republican and wanted to get their agenda across. you consider that jeff sessions was the first senator to go on the trump bandwagon out on a limb and this is how the president is treating him, what does this say to republicans? is this a red flag for them? >> it's a red flag but not a surprising one. anybody that followed donald trump's career would not all of a sudden say wow, this is not new information. donald trump may actually throw under the bus that he doesn't see serving his interests at the moment. look what happened to the house health care bill. all those republicans that voted for the health care bill in the house and then the president had a celebratory session with them in the rose garden and then he called the bill they just vote ford mean and took credit for that as his words. so clearly anybody observing president trump any republican members up on the hill are not ever thinking he's going to have
7:09 pm
their back at all cost noes matter what. they know that's not how this very transactional president operates. >> it sends a message to people who may be in line as a successor if jeff sessions were no longer to be the attorney general. if you've got the president of the united states who i agree with david has been very transactional and the loyalty he expects is a self-interested one, anyone who may be in line to try to replace the attorney general if he resigns or is fired has got to be shaking in their boots saying to themselves, if the very first person to be loyal and endorse can you against all odds and with more of a risk to themselves than for you, why would you be loyal to me in the long run? well will my tenure be even shorter than james comey but the six-month tenure sessions has had to date. that is who is taking notice and pause right now of the president's actions. >> david, i'd like to talk about health care. it's so important for so many
7:10 pm
americans. the senate advanced the health care bill with vice president mike pence breaking a tie. but it's really, it's so they can start the discussion. but senator john mccain's dramatic return on the senate floor after his diagnosis that is the moment to watch today. watch this. >> very nice moment, walk us through what we witnessed tonight. >> it's an amazing moment. obviously as you mentioned the dire diagnosis that he received, he comes home to a hero's welcome as he deserves in the floor of the united states senate. what was so amazing right after this moment, don, was that senator mccain went back to his desk and nearly every member of the senate walked over to him
7:11 pm
and started greeting him individually including a whole slew of democrats nearly all of them coming over from their side of the senate to greet him. there's no doubt also that mccain's return had a psychological impact on the vote you were talking about. obviously, arranging with mitch mcconnell to come back here for this key vote certainly will helped the effort to get the final last folks who may have hurdled to jump over to get to 50 votes and allow mike pence to cast the tiebreaking vote. on the matter of health care, this is now just the beginning. they get on it a bill and start debating and we're already seeing that the ideological divide inside the republican conference that has proven so impossible for them to overcome in terms of coming up with a replacement plan still remains. that divide remains, that gap is unfilled. and they still don't have a consensus plan on what to do once they repeal obamacare.
7:12 pm
>> here we go again. it's not even groundhog's day. i don't know what to call it. thank you, david. thank you, laura. i appreciate that. i want to turn to congressman tim ryan, a democrat from the ohio whose district includes youngstown. despite the growing russian cloud president trump had a good crowd tonight in youngstown, ohio. take a look at this. >> sometimes they say he doesn't act presidential. and i say, hey, look, great schools. smart guy. it's so easy to act presidential. but that's not going to get it done. in fact, i said it's much easier, by the way, to act presidential than what we're doing here tonight, believe me. and i said, with the exception
7:13 pm
of the late great abraham lincoln, i can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office. >> so congressman, you saw the enthusiasm for him in that rally like what they see. they like what they see what, they're getting from this president. his support has not wavered. are they wrong? >> well, he had 6,000 or 7,000 people in the cavelli center in youngstown, ohio, which i don't think is unusual for a sitting president to be able to draw that many people in a community center like that. i don't think that's out of the ordinary. what the people of youngstown, ohio are going to be looking for are deliverables. and he made -- that was a campaign speech. no doubt about that. but it was similar to a lot of the speech thaez made when he was in ohio earlier, don, in the last year and a half. he promised to expand medicare. he promised to protect people against pre-existing conditions. he promised atarilyian dollar infrastructure bill. he was going to open the steel
7:14 pm
mills and coal mines. absolutely none of that has happened. he promised to address the opioid problem that we have in ohio which is very severe. hasn't done anything, in fact, he's gone backwards on those promises supporting bills that throw 20 million people off of their health care and a lot of those people who receive medicaid get treatment for opiate addiction. he's gone backwards or stayed neutral and not even offered a jobs program for people in youngstown. at the end of the day, while they may not have the left him yet, they're going to be watching and they want him to deliver. >> why do you think he continues to give these campaign-style rallies and should democrats be paying more attention? because you listen to it. he's saying it with a degree, tongue in cheek. he's laughing. we get a little bit of a chuckle out of it. but it gets folks riled up. one wonders can, should democrats be paying more attention to this? >> well, i think he needs it. i don't hold that necessarily against him. any president that sits in the
7:15 pm
white house and does this job, it's nice to go out and be with people who support you, who stroke you're go, who clap. they laugh at all your jokes. they think you're the best thing god ever created. any president is going to have a certain amount of those people. i guess it would be nice to go out and get that every now and again. but again, democrats need to stay focused on what our plan is to help those people because we do have a plan on how to grow the economy, how to lift up wages, our health care bill covered 20 million more people. while the obamacare we passed isn't perfect, we need to fix those things. we want to fix it and figure out how we can cover more people. the republicans are trying to throw 20 million people off of health care. so we need to talking about what we're for in order to get those voters to come back home. while they may not come back home tomorrow, there's an election in 18 months and another one in 2020. we'd better be well positioned with a good brand to reach out
7:16 pm
to folks and bring them back home. >> let me ask you about jeff sessions because you've seen what the president has been tweeting about him. they say politics makes strange bedfellows. do you support the continued attacks against attorney general jeff sessions or should he be left alone to continue in his job? >> look, i thought sessions should have resigned a long time ago. i thought it was a noble act for him to step aside and say look, i cannot in good conscience conduct this investigation or oversee this investigation and so he stepped aside. but in typical trump fashion, i don't think it surprises anybody to say, you know, i want to fire you. you're not doing exactly what i say. even though the law says something different, you should do exactly what i say. i think that's troubling. at the end of the day, it's between him and sessions and they've got to figure out how to work it out. >> president trump knocked democrats for not helping to repeal and replace obamacare. he also listed a bunch of states where he says obamacare is
7:17 pm
hurting americans. he pointsed to alaska, to missouri it, pennsylvania. he did not mention ohio. why do you think that is? and what will happen in your state if repeal or replace goes through. >> well, there are areas where it's not working like it should. and we need to fix those problems in high risk areas where insurance companies can't make money. we were actually trying to help insurance companies stay in those areas to cover people so we would give insurance companies payments. otherwise, those people wouldn't get any health insurance. republicans are unwinding that. so the insurance companies are losing money. so the companies pull out of those high risk areas, risk corridors and turn around and say look, obamacare is not working. they're undermining this at every turn. let's fix those things where there are high premiums, let's fix that. let's figure out how to get more people in the pool to drive down costs. those are appropriate things for us to do. but here's the bottom line, don.
7:18 pm
in both the house republican version and the senate republican version, congressional budget office which is a neutral analysis of the bills, say 22 million americans will get thrown off their health care. that if you're protected by a -- from getting thrown off your insurance because you have a pre-existing condition, the insurance companies will be able to do that again. the democrats covered 20 million more people. and we got between the insurance company and the patient where you would think you had some coverage on a policy and then you got sick and you went to get coverage and the insurance company said, oh, we're not going to cover you. we don't cover that. we made sure that no matter what policy you bought, maternity care was covered, addiction and treatment was covered, emergency room visits were covered and a slew of other things so if you were paying for insurance, you would actually get insurance
7:19 pm
coverage. republicans are repealing and rolling back all of those provisions and trump is supporting them, don. then he turns around and comes to youngstown and says, we're going to make it better. this health care thing is great. you may have heard today it passed with 51 votes. that is destructive to people in my congressional district where 200,000 or 300,000 people use coverage to get opiate treatment. senior citizens, all the rest. he's throwing people off of health care and he campaigned that he was going to expand health care coverage for people. i mean, so people got to pay attention to what he's doing, not the sideshow, not the circus, not the red meat, not that he's better than abraham lincoln or he's going to be on mt. rushmore but that what are his policies and so far, zero legislative initiatives have passed. >> and the american people need to see -- people in washington don't even know what they're voting on when it comes to this.
7:20 pm
we hope within the next couple days they will and we'll get a handle what they're voting on and what could happen when it comes to health care. i appreciate it. when we come back, a former cia and nsa director joins me. i'll ask him why he says the now notorious don junior meeting at trump tower was likely a russian intel operation. where, in all of this, is the stuff that matters? the stakes are so high, your finances, your future. how do you solve this? you don't. you partner with a firm that advises governments and the fortune 500, and, can deliver insight person to person, on what matters to you. morgan stanley.
7:21 pm
7:22 pm
a girl with golden locks broke into a house owned by three bears. she ate some porridge, broke the baby bear's chair, and stole some jewelry, a flat-screen tv, and a laptop.
7:23 pm
luckily the geico insurance agency had helped the bears with homeowners insurance. they were able to replace all their items... ...including a new chair from crate and barrel. call geico and see how easy it is to switch and save on homeowners insurance. ykeep you sidelined.ng that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. big developments in the russia investigation. president trump's former campaign chairman paul manafort
7:24 pm
met behind closed doors today with the senate intelligence committee but will not be compelled tomorrow before the judicia committee. jared kushner was back on the hill today. joining me now general michael hayden, a former director of both the cia and national security agency. man, a lot to get to. maybe a little bit confusing to viewers. the senate intelligence committee, house intel and all of that. general hayden, where is this investigation heading? because president trump who repeatedly denied any contact between the campaign and russians was contradicted by his son-in-law jared kushner. he had four meetings with russians. what's your take what we've learned? >> first of all, president trump, the trump campaign, the transition team, don, just took an absolutist approach to any sessions of contact with the russians. and they just simply said there weren't any. they didn't do any homework. there wasn't any great care, indicative of a lot of things
7:25 pm
that have been said by the administration. and now as you begin to peel this back, there turns out to have been an awful lot of contacts. which may lead nowhere. we've got to let the investigation take its course. it puts the lie to the fact there were no contacts. frankly, the more you learn, the more you're forced to conclude that at a minimum, mr. trump's campaign was naive in terms of tats view towards the russians. >> it doesn't help them on the credibility level. you know, you told ryan lizza everyone you're speaking with thinks that don junior meeting at trump tower was a russian intel operation. why do they believe that? >> oh, it's classic trade craft on the part of the russians. first of all, it's called a soft approach. you don't use people whose business cards say we're part of russian intelligence. so it's an indirect soft approach. you learn a lot. if you're the russians, you learn a lot from the meet nothing matter what it is the
7:26 pm
americans think is going on. number one, you learn that the trump campaign will take the meeting. and number two, you learn that even after the meeting, they don't report it to federal authorities. they don't report it to the fbi because the russians are good enough that they would have noticed an increase in fbi surveillance had that been the case. then finally, if you're the russians, you begin to believe that the campaign is comfortable enough with the relationship with the russians even one premised on the suggestion that the russians will offer information in return for something the russians want perhaps sanctions relief. and oh, yeah, don, one more thing. you've already put the first down payment on what the russians would call kompromat. you've already compromised yourself by accepting the meeting and not reporting it. >> i also want your take on the president's public attacks.
7:27 pm
i've been wanting to talk to you about this, attacks against jeff sessions. here he is just today. >> i want the attorney general to be much tougher on the leaks from intelligence agencies which are leaking like rarely have they ever leaked before at a very important level. these are intelligence agencies. we cannot have that happen. you know many of my views in addition to that, but i think that's one of the very important things that they have to get on with. i told you before i'm very disappointed with the attorney general. but we will see what happens. time will tell. time will tell. >> the president has been talking about leaks from day one, but in this case, is this really about the leaks or is it really about trying to stop the mueller investigation? >> well in, my view, it's about the latter, not the former. a couple of other observations. number one in my old profession, 39 years in the american armed forces, what you just saw there
7:28 pm
would be called undue command influence on a judicial process. number two, i know senator sessions. i don't agree with him on everything, but that man has treated me with nothing but respect and dignity in my relationship with him. so this is a great sadness. then finally, don, and this is probably the most important point. you have the president attacking his attorney general because in the eyes of most people, the attorney general did what was expected of him for the ethical demands of his profession. now, don, if i'm the director of national intelligence, if i'm the director of the central intelligence agency, i'm going to school on this episode. and trying to figure out what it means for me when i've got to go in and tell the president something he definitely doesn't want hear. >> yeah. it has been, general, 25 days since president trump won the
7:29 pm
election. he hasn't aced off the gas when it comes to fiery campaign rhetoric. just the past few days, he shot off 34ub8 tweets calling for hillary clinton to be investigated on russia, on e-mails. is this behavior you think damaging to the presidency and ultimately to the country? >> look, as a citizen, i think it is. it is unpresidential. it is distracting. what we need to do as a nation, don, is simply get to the bottom of this whole russia thing. get it behind us. and i fear the president is getting in the way of that. and to give a little bit of human understanding to the president, i mean, a lot of americans are using this episode to challenge his legitimacy as president. the american intelligence community isn't doing that. >> right. >> the ic simply wants to make america better defended and we can only do that if we get to the facts of this case. >> yeah, which is interesting because i mean, he's got the ultimate, he could say the intel communities are not saying that i'm not legitimately the
7:30 pm
president. but i want to investigate this to make sure that our elections aren't compromised. i think that's really the ultimate. >> don, that would be classic. i am the legitimate president. this is a serious matter. i'm going to go to camp david with my intelligence community chiefs. we're going to get to the bottom of this. >> i know you were at the aspen security forum last week. i want to get your reaction to some of what we heard from the current directors of the cia and dni. watch this. >> i am confident that the russians meddled in this election as is the entire intelligence community. >> is there any dissent within the community that you oversee on the question whether the russians interfered with the american election? >> there is no dissent and i stated that publicly and stated to the president. >> so we learned last night from the new white house communications director anthony scaramucci that the president trump doesn't accept is the intelligence conclusion on russia. president trump is taking putin
7:31 pm
at his word. >> yeah, and that's kind of scary. this is a high confidence judgment. from my generation that had its judgments about iraq weapons of mass destruction this community doesn't go the high confidence anymore unless it really has high confidence. you've got both the current and forrer director of national intelligence, director of the central intelligence agency, secretary of homeland security, and the homeland security adviser to the president current and former all saying the russians did it. and yet, for whatever personal reasons, the president can't accept it. that's a little scary going forward because it suggests there might be other circumstances in which the president for his own reasons rejects what his intelligence community is telling him. >> always, always a pleasure to have you on. general michael hayden, thank you. >> when we come back, the president lashing out at the russia investigation as it progresses.
7:32 pm
is it trump being trump or is it the pressure that's getting to him?
7:33 pm
when we see people, we see their hunger. their courage. we see their dreams. we see the things that built our nation. and we wonder, what would happen if everyone had equal access to education? what would they discover? what new worlds would they build? that's why we built a university for people. not for profit.
7:34 pm
quote
7:35 pm
as the president lashes out at his attorney general and the special counsel, members of his inner circle are answering questions from his congress. richard painter is a former white house ethics lawyer, john flannery from the southern district of new york and matthew whitaker from the foundation of accountability and civic trust, a former u.s. attorney. so good to have you on. matt, we learned a short time ago the subpoena for paul manafort to the appear before the senate judiciary committee has been dropped.
7:36 pm
that the two sides are still talking about an appearance should manafort have to testify publicly, you think? >> well, manafort is going to have a very interesting story to tell. it's going to be the first time we'll be able to compare the stories from jared kushner and donald trump jr. and to see if he had the same version of the meeting and what actually happened after the meeting. that's the most important fact is the meeting happened. i think the general right before us explained really well what the risks are, but it is what happened after the meeting. was there any follow-up and was there any deliverables. >> yeah. you think he should, manafort, my question was, should he have to testify publicly? >> i don't think he should have had to testify publicly at this time. eventually, the american people do need to hear this. >> manafort did appear earlier today before the senate intelligence committee, john, provided documents to them and answered questions about russia. for the second day, jared kushner talk to investigators about his russia contacts and
7:37 pm
that june 6th meeting. both men connected to the kremlin promised dirt on hillary clinton. the one set up by don junior. >> we have an interesting development with the son-in-law basically talking and pushing back the dates to april of 2016 when mr. trump gave a speech at the may flower hotel arranged by jared. what he leaves out in his statement is not only that he, jared, meet with the ambassador from russia but so did mr. trump. and mr. trump had the ambassador sitting in the first row as he said he was going to ace the tensions against russia. why shouldn't old enemies become friends. and that's an important meeting. and it's in the same month that we're told the russian hackers went into the dnc. so he pushed the date back, and mr. trump who said he never met with the russians specifically met with the russian at that time, shook hands with him and he sat in the first row as trump
7:38 pm
gave a speech probably written by paul manafort or maybe even by kisscy lack who heads up the center for national interest originally called the nixon center. >> richard, as the investigation grinds on, we're seeing the president lashing out, today his outburst started on twitter 6:00 a.m. saying jeff sessions has taken a very weak position on hillary clinton climbs. already with e-mails and dnc server and leerkz? he's calling sessions weak but also resurrecting this idea of a criminal pursuit of hillary clinton. is that possible and what would the fallout be? >>. >> it's one more twitter tantrum from the twitter in chief i guess. but this idea asking occur attorney general to investigate your opponent who lost the election and prosecute your opponent, we don't do business that way in the united states. we don't prosecute the person who lost the election. and you know, that type of abuse
7:39 pm
of power is exactly the type of thing that ought to lead to impeachment of a president. if that order were carried out. fortunately, we have an attorney general who is not going to be so stupid as to go after hillary clinton or over that was somethinged ad nauseam over several there. and to see him give up his senate seat to work for president trump and be humiliate this had way only six months into the job, you know, a think a lot of those senators are thinking that's what loyalty gets you. >> can i ask you guys something,
7:40 pm
before you jump in, john, do you think -- he's putting the focus when is he does this on russia in a backhanded way. do you think this is maybe he's trying to divert attention from russia, from health care, knowing full well he's never going to fire jeff sessions and jeff sessions is just taking the incoming so that he can divert attention away from that and they can do what they want with health care and people aren't talking directly about russia as much in the news? >> well -- >> well, i -- >> i'd be surprised if that's the strategy here. i think this president talks off top of his head. it's whatever is happening today in his life and whatever he sees on the news and wants to respond to. i take him at his word when he says that he thinks that sessions is weak or when he says that time will tell. i think that's at the moment what he's thinking. i don't think there's a bigger strategy to distract and you know, i mean, the senate voted with him and did his bidding today, 50 of the 52 republican
7:41 pm
senators. so i mean it seems like that he's not turning that many people off yet. >> thank goodness for john mccain who by the way he said wasn't a real war hero because he got captured. if john mccain didn't come through with that particular vote, who knows what he would be saying today. listen, even with all the russia questions, richard, swirling around the white house, we learned that the president's nominee, the head of the justice department's criminal division, he disclosed business ties to a russian bank, alpha bank. can't they find anyone for a top job who doesn't have a tie to russia? >> well, it seems like they're all in with the russians. but at least i believe he was truthful about that. the thing that's troubling about this administration is so many of them are lying about their contacts with the russians. starting with general flynn running all the way on through the most recent communications from donald trump jr. and jared
7:42 pm
kushner. and that is very troubling when they won't tell the truth about their contacts with the russians. i think the confidence in the house and the senate is eroding. they just had a procedural vote today on health care but then they voted down this crazy bill they had and they got to the actually come up with a law. that's a lot harder. you're not going to get legislation through when people don't trust you. in order to get people to trust you, you have to tell the truth. and they've been doing a lot of lying. >> john? >> it's not working. > pardon me. >> go ahead, john. >> even this nominee though, and i think what we're saying is true. even this nominee is refusing to disclose what he did for the russian bank where the conflicts would arise. it's not enough to tell us you're working for a russian bank. we can disclose certain things but not tell you what we were doing. if a person is in that position and has that obligation not to disclose it, i don't think they should be considered for the position, particularly given where we stand today with all
7:43 pm
the russian influence that compromises our national policy. but the, as for the -- as for mr. trump's tweets and stuff like that, i think you're absolutely right. i think it is his device, sort of like a trapped animal in a net to strike out by trying to distract us, but there's a method to his nad madness. the method is he doesn't want to fire the attorney general. he wants him to resign under pressure and humiliation. and i think that he's looking probably to do the same with the acting deputy attorney general. because that's his path. he thinks, to obstruct the investigation even his talk about pardons i think is part of his policy not for us to think about would he do it or not but reassuring the people, the dwarfs out there who might put him in the cat bird seat are encouraged to believe if they get close they don't have to worry, that mr. trump will take care of them, which is hard to believe given how disloyal he's been to so many people over so
7:44 pm
many days since he's been the president. >> john, matt, richard, thank you. i appreciate it. when we come back, senator john mccain returning to the senate only days after major surgery and cancer and a cancer diagnosis. we're going to show you his emotional speech that has everyone talking.
7:45 pm
7:46 pm
7:47 pm
an emotional moment on the senate floor today. senator john mccain returning. just 11 days after brain surgery to cast his crucial health care vote. and he had a powerful message for his colleagues on both sides of the aisle. >> let's trust each other. let's return to regular order. we've been spinning our wheels
7:48 pm
on too many important issues because we keep trying to find a way to win without help from across the aisle. that's an approach that's been employed by both sides mandating legislation from the top down without any support from the other side with all the parliamentary maneuvers that requires. we are getting nothing done, my friends. we're getting nothing done. and all we've really done this year is confirm neil gorsuch to the supreme court. our health care insurance system is a mess. we all know it. those who support obamacare and those who oppose it. something has to be done. >> here to discuss former congressman steve israel, cnn political commenter, ana navarro and scott jennings, both political commentators. ana, your reaction to senator john mccain's emotional return to the floor? >> it was emotional for me. i spoke to yawn a couple of days ago, last week, and i knew he
7:49 pm
wanted to get back in the game. i think it was a very well thought out speech. i understand a lot of people are very disappointed with the way he voted, wish he had voted differently. that being said, i asked him to take a look at his words. i thought his words were particularly significant for republicans. for me the part that stuck the most was when he reminded republicans that they are not subservient to the president of the united states. they are equals to the president of the united states. an equal branch. i think it's a very powerful moment when 80-year-old john mccain gets up from his sick bed after surgery, after receiving a scary scary diagnosis, and gets up and goes to give this call to action to his colleagues. his defense of the institution, this defense of going back to regular order and doing things in a bipartisan way. finding compromises. i found his words to be very, very powerful.
7:50 pm
i am hopeful that john will make a difference in this process of this bill and make this bill better. >> you're right about his words because even the people who were as you said disappointed, some people were disappointed in the way he votes, some people. his words were very important. his return he said he wanted to see changes in this bill. he wanted to bring democrats on board. other senators share similar concerns. do you see him bringing republicans back together and also getting republicans to work with democrats? >> i think republicans would love to work with democrats. i have a hard time believing you're going to find enough democrats in the u.s. senate wanting to do anything besides move us towards single payer which no republican wants to do. we have divergent views. they want to go to single payer. bernie sanders wants to go to
7:51 pm
single payer and so -- >> let's not talk about the democrats. i'll read it for you. other senators share similar concerns. do you see him bringing republicans back together? >> oh, well, sure. i think john mccain is a powerful unifying voice and i think his words about the need for bipartisanship struck a powerful note today. where most conservative republican senators and most democrat senators very far apart. a lot of daylight in those positions. can you bring enough people to together to do a bipartisan approach? i'm dubious of that. >> they got 51 votes with the vice president. they made the vice president help them out. what is the strategy of the democrats now? you heard what scott just said. democrats want single payer.
7:52 pm
they don't want anything the republicans want. >> i respect scott, but he's wrong. they continue to say and believe that there can be fixes to the affordable care act. we want to do it, we're willing it do it but we have a republican senate right now that has said that they're just going to bulldoze ahead on a bill and what you saw today and what you're going to see over the next few days is a senate that is flying by the seat of their senate pants. they are doing these amendments but they don't even have a bill to amend. they don't know where they're going to end up, how they're going to end up and by the way, this is just pregame. you think this is interesting. wait until they pass something. even if they pass something, it goes back to the house of representatives and that gets very interesting. we're going to be in déjà vu on top of déjà vu. we're going to be right back where we were a month ago.
7:53 pm
if there's a houses senate conference. which tells you that this is just chaos. it's irresponsible. >> is there any way -- is there any way you will work with republicans as repeal and replace, is it off the table if it's repeal and replace you'll work with republicans? >> we don't want to repeal the entire thing. we don't want these massive cuts in medicaid. we don't want to tell people with preexisting conditions we can't help. we will meet in the middle. but we need somebody to meet. i hope john mccain can help. i don't care what it's called as long as the american people are able to get health care that is quality, affordable. and doesn't discriminate against them if they have things like skin cancer. >> very easy to posture when you
7:54 pm
think you can get your way. when you are es all you can't, that's when compromise happens and so if people stick to the position of john mccain who belloed against the process or lack thereof getting it passed. the falkt there have been no amendments. >> hago on if you want to continue. >> i actually think we've seen some biartisan in the senate lately. the russia sanctions bill tagged iran. so the senate has come together on other issues. so bipartisanship isn't totally dead. the issue on health care is you've got republicans who want nothing to do with the core democratic idea and you've got democrats who i respect very
7:55 pm
much who don't want to repeal and replace obamacare. they largely like and think it's working. and so finding compromise in there, i think this is the one issue where you're go having to the broadest differences. i think even on tax reform, you're going to find things in common. >> if you look at the cbo and studies, many experts have said obamacare is not dying under its own weight but there are republicans who believe that. do you agree as scott said -- >> president trump said it's killing people. he says it's killing people. it's a disaster. i believe it has flaws like many well intended laws and democrats and republicans have responsibility to fix it. i had breakfast yesterday with a republican member of congress who said to me without cameras, without sound bites, he believes
7:56 pm
they can get to a responsible compromise and maybe what we need do is let those members of congress have those quiet conversations and produce a compromise that works outside of the theatrics we witnessed today. >> what steve is eluding to is this a may wind up in a conference committee -- >> thank you. i got to get to the top of the hour. when we come back how is the president doing so far? here's what he says. >> i can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office. >> more next. and i quit smoking with chantix. everything i did circled around that cigarette when i started taking the chantix that urge just slowly diminished and it was a great and empowering feeling. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. chantix reduced my urge to smoke. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms.
7:57 pm
some people had changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, agitation, depressed mood or suicidal thoughts or actions with chantix. serious side effects may include seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking or allergic and skin reactions which can be life-threatening. stop chantix and get help right away if you have any of these. tell your healthcare provider if you've had depression or other mental health problems. decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. the most common side effect is nausea. i don't even think about cigarettes anymore. ask your doctor if chantix is right for you. many insurance plans cover chantix for a low or $0 copay. what are all these different topped & loaded meals? it's an american favorite on top of an american favorite, alice. it's like rodeos on top of rollercoasters. get your favorites on top of your favorites. only at applebee's. i knew at that exact moment ... i'm beating this. my main focus was to find a team of doctors.
7:58 pm
it's not just picking a surgeon, it's picking the care team and feeling secure in where you are. visit cancercenter.com/breast is america's number-one you kmotorcycle insurer. yeah, she does purr! best bike i ever owned! no, you're never alone, because our claims reps are available 24/7. we even cover accessories and custom parts. we diget an early start! took the kids to soccer practice. you want me to jump that cactus? all right. aah! that lady's awesome. i don't see a possum! with a stunning 4k displaydow and graphics thates. bring them to life. peter! you still with us? the dell inspiron 15 7000 gaming. dell, as real as it gets.
7:59 pm
pcountries thatk mewe traveled,t what is your nationality and i would always answer hispanic. so when i got my ancestry dna results it was a shocker. i'm everything. i'm from all nations. i would look at forms now and wonder what do i mark? because i'm everything. and i marked other. discover the story only your dna can tell. order your kit now at ancestrydna.com.
8:00 pm
a tale of two leaders in their own words. president trump speaking to a cheering crowd tonight says this. with the exception of the late, great abraham lincoln i can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office. that i can tell you. >> meanwhile senator john mccain returns to the senate 11 days after brain surgery and says this.

50 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on