Skip to main content

tv   State of the Union With Jake Tapper  CNN  July 30, 2017 9:00am-10:00am PDT

9:00 am
a wild week in washington. reince priebus resigns. >> the president wanted to go a different direction. >> and homeland security secretary john kelly takes his place. >> john kelly is one of our great stars. >> plus, devastating defeat. john mccain's dramatic thumbs down tanks the health care bill. >> boy oh boy. can you believe that? >> can republicans rally after an embarrassing loss? >> no party can remain in power by lying to the american people.
9:01 am
>> one of only three republican senators to vote no. senator susan collins joins me in minutes. and democrats battle back. >> i hope we can work together to make the system better. >> can democrats use this victory? >> we are back. >> to strengthen their party's agenda. senator bernie sanders is here live on what comes next. hello. i'm jake tapper. where the state of our union is tense after a friday staffing shake-up, secretary and retired marine general john kelly is now fewer than 24 hours away from officially starting his new job as white house chief of staff. and one of his first orders of business could be dealing with an international crisis. just hours ago the u.s. military announced a skull test of its thaad missile defense system not long after flying u.s. bombers over the korean peninsula. this is in direct response to a friday ballistic missile launch by north korea. meanwhile president trump is taking aim at china saying he's
9:02 am
very disappointed in that country. "they do nothing for us with north korea, just talk. we will no longer allow this to continue. china could easily solve this problem." all of this is sure to make for an interesting first day on the job for john kelly. he's also dealing with a white house in something of a chaotic situation plus the health care bill the president insists is still alive. joining me now to talk about this is the director of the office of management and budget, former congressman mick mulvany, director mulvaney, always good to have you on. thanks for joining us. ? thanks for having me as always. and i know you want to talk about policy but i do just want to ask about some of the white house personnel issues. when general kelly is sworn in on monday as white house chief of staff will all staff members immediately begin reporting to him? >> i don't know. i answer to the chief of staff, and i will continue to do that. the office of management and budget actually reports directly to the chief of staff. obviously, we answer to the president as everybody does in the west wing. but as far as i know, my reporting doesn't change, nor do i have any reason for it to change. so we'll continue to do our business at omb the same way we
9:03 am
did last week. i think we're doing some good work and look forward to continuing that under general kelly's leadership. >> i guess one of the reasons i'm asking is just because some of the people who have worked at the white house or work continuously at the white house say that because there are so many different power centers and people who seemingly have equal status to the chief of staff it can be confusing and that's one of the reasons for the chaos. so for instance, do you happen to know if anthony scaramucci, the new communications director, who said when he came on board that he reports directly to the president, will he have to report to john kelly? do you have any idea? >> again, i've seen those same reports, and i recognize that sort of narrative is out there. all i know is it's very clear what we do at omb and that's not going to change. i really can't speak to the other reporting within the white house. >> let me turn to health care. following this week's collapse of republican efforts to repeal obamacare and on occasion replace it, the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell said he's ready to move on to other issues. president trump seems pretty stuck on the issue. he's been tweeting about it all weekend long, including this
9:04 am
morning. this is what he tweeted yesterday. "unless the republican senators are total quitters, repeal and replace is not dead. demand another vote before voting on any other bill." is this official white house policy, that nothing should be voted on in congress, not even the debt ceiling, before the senate votes again on health care? >> well, i think -- yes. and i think what you're seeing there is the president simply reflecting the mood of the people. go and poll the american public and find out what the most important issue is to them right now, and it's health care. in the white house's view they can't move on in the senate. in the people's view they shouldn't move on in the senate. they should stay and work and figure out a way to solve this problem. keep in mind you're talking about smk they've promised to do for seven years. you can't promise folks you're going to do something for seven years and then not do it. so in addition to this policy consideration you do have obamacare, it is failing. it is hurting people. so to not change it allows that to go forward. that's a policy consideration. at the same time you have the political consideration that you promised folks you'd do this for
9:05 am
seven years. you cannot go back on that. so yes, they need to stay, they need to work, they need to pass something, and i think that's not only official white house position on this right now, it's sort of the national attitude toward it. >> well, polls indicate that the american people, a plurality of them support obamacare but i don't want to get into a whole discussion of what the american people want. i do want to ask you about a tweet that president trump sent out saturday that was kind of cryptic. he wrote, "if a new health care bill is not approved quickly bailouts for insurance companies and bailouts for members of congress will end very soon." on the bailouts for insurance companies, i'll get to that in a second. but is the president threatening to cut off funding for the health insurance plans for members of congress? is that what that means? bailouts for members of congress? >> yeah, actually i talked to the president at length about that exact issue yesterday, and i think his attitude is this, and his attitude is pretty simple. keep in mind he does have a way of channeling a large number of the american public. and what he's saying is look, if obamacare is hurting people, and it is, then why shouldn't it
9:06 am
hurt insurance companies and more importantly perhaps for this discussion members of congress? there is a certain benefit that members of congress get as part of an opm decision from a couple years ago. and i think the president's simply looking at this and going is this fair? is it fair obamacare's hurting people? if you live in a county that's called a bare county with no coverage, if you're obliged by law to buy something that's not for sale that's hurting you or if you've got coverage but you can't afford to go to the doctor and that's hurting you, shouldn't insurance companies and members of congress bear some of that burden as well? we'll see what happens as we move forward. >> so that's on the chopping block, perhaps taking away the health care plans, the health insurance plans for members of congress. would he target staff members for this as well? >> back up just a second. you don't take away coverage from members of congress and so forth. members of congress are obliged by law to participate in the exchanges. i did when i was a member of congress. but there was also a decision from the office of personnel management a couple years ago that allowed a special exemption
9:07 am
to the rules on employer contributions to those plans. so it's not a concept of taking coverage away. it's the approach actually obliging members of congress to follow the exact law that the folks that they govern are following. >> so forcing them onto the obamacare exchanges? is that what it is? >> they are already on the exchanges. let's make that clear. all is that stuff you read on the internet that congress exempted themselves from obamacare is not right. when i was a member of congress, i had to be on the exchanges. the special exemption dealt with the employer contribution, how much your employer when you're a member of congress, that's the federal government, can contribute to your coverage. and that's the rule that the president was talking about in his tweet yesterday. >> lastly, sir, are you optimistic that general kelly, secretary kelly, will bring a discipline to the white house that is needed? >> absolutely. i think that's why he's there. take reince at his word. i don't think reince is hiding the ball on this at all. the president wanted to change directions, wanted to go a different way in the way that
9:08 am
office was managed. i think reince was terribly effective but was probably a little bit more laid back and independent in the way he ran the office. and i think the president wants to go a different direction, wants a little bit more discipline, a little more structure in there. you know that he enjoys working with generals. we have several of them in the administration who are doing extraordinary jobs. and the president likes that. so i simply think you saw him say you know what, let's try a different direction when it comes to chief of staff, i'm actually looking forward to working with john kelly. he's been a tremendous secretary of the department of homeland security. i've enjoyed working with him for the last six months. and i'm actually excited about the next several months. >> director mulvaney, it's always good to have you. thanks for joining us this morning. appreciate. . >> thanks, jake. a week of infighting and drama ends in the resignation of the president's chief of staff reince priebus. will a general get things in order? stay with us. it's time for some straight talk. if you love your phone but hate your bill. do something about it! no, not that. straight talk wireless let's you keep your phone, number and 4g lte network
9:09 am
for a lot less, with the bring your own phone activation kit. it's time to ask yourself... why haven't i switched? unlimited talk, text and data for forty-five dollars a month, no contract. straight talk wireless. only at walmart.
9:10 am
i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. you give us comfort. and we give you bare feet... i love you, couch. ...backsweat and gordo's everything. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze fabric refresher with odorclear technology... ...cleans away odors like never before. because the things you love the most can stink. and plug in febreze to keep your whole room fresh for up... 45 days. breathe happy with new febreze.
9:11 am
hi..and i know that we have phonaccident, so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it. i'start at the new carfax.comar. show me minivans with no reported accidents. boom. love it. [struggles] show me the carfax. start your used car search at the all-new
9:12 am
forhas adapted to my weightic and shape... so i sleep deeply... and wake up ready to perform. only exclusive retailers carry tempur-pedic. find yours at
9:13 am
welcome back to "state of the union." i'm jake tapper. a dramatic moment on capitol hill. senator john mccain in the wee hours of the morning voting no on the republicans' latest plan to repeal and replace obamacare. his vote along with that of two other republicans, murkowski and collins, was enough to quash the bill. and president trump frankly looked back in anger. >> they should have approved health care last night. but you can't have everything. boy, oh boy. they've been working on that one for seven years. can you believe that? the swamp. >> joining me now one of the three republican senators who voted no on that legislation. senator susan collins of maine. senator, thanks so much for joining us. >> my pleasure, jake. >> so senator, before i get to policy, i just have to ask, i saw this viral video of you getting off an airplane in bangor, maine and a crowd of people spontaneously and
9:14 am
organically applauding you. i don't know if that happens to you every time you get off an airplane in bangor, maine. but it was a pretty remarkable thing. what is the response you're getting? >> it really was so extraordinary, heartwarming and affirming. i got off the plane, and there was a large group of outbound passengers, none of whom i happened to know. and spontaneously some of them started applauding and then virtually all of them started to applaud. it was just amazing. i've never had that happen in the 20 years that i've been privileged to serve in the senate. so it was very encouraging and affirming. especially arriving back home after a very difficult time. >> a very difficult time, very contentious time. president trump, as you know, is hoping to revive the effort to repeal and replace obamacare. he needs the vote of one more
9:15 am
senator in order to flip someone's vote, whether yours or murkows murkowski's or mccain's, the president seems to be threatening to cut off funding for the health care plans that members of congress receive. would that kind of pressure change your vote? >> no. but you know, the ball is really in our court right now. there are serious problems with the aca. we're seeing collapsing markets in some areas of the country where even though people have subsidies they're not going to be able to buy an insurance policy. so our job is not done. and what we need to do is to remember my friend lamar alexander's words, which is that he says that congress doesn't do comprehensive well. we need to go back to committee, to the health committee and the finance committee, identify the problems, carefully evaluate possible solutions through
9:16 am
hearings, and then produce a series of bills to correct these problems. the most serious of which is the pending collapse of the insurance markets. and i certainly hope the administration does not do anything in the meantime to hasten that collapse. >> well, as you know, the president is also threatening to cut off what he calls bailouts for insurance companies. presumably he's referring to the payments the government makes to insurance companies. to reduce the costs for low-income americans. the trump administration has threatened to withhold this money before, which has led to uncertainty among insurance providers. if president trump were to officially withdraw that funding, would that affect your vote on health care? >> it would not affect my vote on health care. but it's an example of why we need to act to make sure that those payments, which are not an insurance company bailout but rather help people who are very
9:17 am
low income afford their out-of-pocket costs toward their deductibles and their co-pays. and that's what we need to remember. so it really would be detrimental to some of the most vulnerable citizens if those payments were cut off. they're paid to the insurance companies, but the people that they benefit are people who make between 100% and 250% of the poverty rate. so we're talking about low-income americans who would be devastated if those payments were cut off. the threat to cut off those payments has contributed to the instability in the insurance market. but what congress needs to do is to start with the first bill we should consider is how to stabilize the market. and that is a key component to
9:18 am
ensure that those payments continue to be made to benefit low-income americans. >> you are one of three republican senators who voted against the so-called skinny repeal of obamacare. when did you realize that senator john mccain was going to join you and senator lisa murkowski of alaska in voting no? and what did vice president pence say to you when he walked up to you on the senate floor and tapped you on the back? >> well, senator mccain had given an extremely eloquent speech on the senate floor the day before, when he had arrived back from arizona after his devastating diagnosis with brain cancer. and he called for a return to the regular order, where we would work together across the aisle to produce legislation. and it's been my experience as well that that is what works best and that is what produces sound legislation. so he's given this dramatic and heartfelt speech, but it was only the day of the vote, just a
9:19 am
few hours before the vote, that i realized from my conversations with him that he was going to vote no. vice president pence had come over originally to break the tie that most people anticipated was going to happen when lisa murkowski of alaska and i voted no. instead the vice president ended up coming over to lobby john mccain directly to try to get him to vote yes. and i was talking with john, and i felt this tap on my shoulder, and i turned around and it's the vice president. and he said to me, "boy, are you tough." but he softened that by putting his arm around me. and he's always been extremely courteous in his conversations with me. he then started talking with john. we were reminiscing in some ways. and then it was obvious he
9:20 am
wanted to have a private conversation with john about the bill, so i stepped aside and did not participate in that part of the bill. but i was very proud of john once again. he showed the courage that he's demonstrated throughout his life to do the right thing. even when it's not popular, even when it's hard. >> the health care bill is just one of many moments of drama in the last week. there's been a tremendous amount of infighting at the white house, the president attacking his own attorney general. the communications director attacking the now former chief of staff and the president's senior strategist. is this affecting the president's ability to get his agenda passed on capitol hill? >> it doesn't really affect the president's agenda. as i said, i really think that the health care bill, and i think it will be a series of bills, is in our court now.
9:21 am
but i don't think it's helpful to the presidency in general. and the president certainly has the right to choose whomever he wants to be on his personal staff, but i certainly hope that his new communications director strikes a different tone than he has in his first week on the job. >> i want to ask you a question about governing in the trump era. when the president tweets, do you consider those tweets to be policy, or should they be ignored in the way the pentagon seems to be in a way treating his tweet about banning transgender people from serving in the military. they seem to be saying he tweeted that but we don't have any policy so we're just going to keep on as we're going. how do you take the president's tweets? >> i personally don't think that governing or setting policy by tweet is a wise approach. it creates confusion. it does not give details.
9:22 am
these are serious issues that we're dealing with. i do understand why it's attractive to the president to be able to get his message out. but when it comes to an issue that has widespread implications, whether it's health care or the transgender issue for our military, i just don't think that i tweet is the right way to go. i think he should have a serious policy discussion with his cabinet, with those who are responsible for implementing policy, because then there's much more clarity in how to proceed. that would be my advice to the president. but i know he's very fond of twitter. >> he sure is. senator susan collins of maine, thank you so much for your time today. we appreciate it. >> thank you. he celebrated the collapse of the republican health care bill as a victory for the american people, but is senator
9:23 am
bernie sanders ready to work with republicans on a compromise going forward? bernie sanders joins us live next. people would ask me that we traveled,ntries what is your nationality and i would always answer hispanic. so when i got my ancestry dna results it was a shocker. i'm from all nations. it puts a hunger in your heart to want to know more. why? we can't stay here! terrible toilet paper! i'll never get clean! way ahead of you. charmin ultra strong. it cleans better. it's four times stronger and... can use less. enjoy the go with charmin. there's nothing more than my so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. gets it. and with their price match, i know i'm getting the best price every time. now i can start relaxing even before the vacation begins. your vacation is very important. that's why makes finding the right hotel
9:24 am
for the right price easy. visit now to find out why we're booking.yeah! it's about moving forward, not back.t. it's looking up, not down. it's being in motion. in body, in spirit, in the now. boost® high protein it's intelligent nutrition with 15 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for when you need a little extra. boost® the number one high protein complete nutritional drink. be up for it
9:25 am
i found the perfect come in this afternoon. oh. no. no! when the unexpected strikes... don't worry we've got you covered. the hartford strikes back.
9:26 am
yogig-speed you know what's not awesome? when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids. and these guys. him. ah. oh hello- that lady. these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh. sure. still yes! you can get it too. welcome to the party.
9:27 am
introducing gig-speed internet from xfinity. finally, gig for your neighborhood too. welcome back to "state of the union." i'm jake tapper. president trump is now threatening to withhold payments to insurance companies that help low-income consumers in retaliation for republicans failing to move forward on repealing and replacing obamacare. joining me now is independent senator bernie sanders of the great state of vermont. senator sanders, always good to see you. thanks for joining us. let's just plunge right into health care. president trump threatening on twitter "both lawmakers and insurance companies" on saturday saying he's prepared to cut
9:28 am
out -- cut off the quote bailout that you and the insurance companies receive. what do you make of these threats? >> you know, i really think it's incomprehensible that we have a president of the united states that wants to sabotage health care in america, make life more difficult for millions of people who are struggling now to get the health insurance they need and to pay for that health insurance. maybe the president should put down his -- stop his twittering -- tweeting for a while and understand that america today is the only country, only major country on earth not to guarantee health care to all people and the solution is not to throw tens of millions of people off of health insurance that they currently have. >> what do you make of the threats directly at members of congress about your health insurance? mick mulvaney was on the show earlier trying to explain what the threat exactly meant. >> well, i would turn that around a little bit and say to the president of the united states that yes, every single
9:29 am
american in every state in this country should be able to get the health care that members of congress have. and that is why if we are able to return to regular order, if we are able to have a serious debate on the holt care crisis i think there should be a public omgs available in every state in this country. if people don't like the private insurance that they're getting, if it's too expensive, they should have a medicare-type public option available in every state in this coy.and that's on forward. >> when you were on the program on july 2nd you told me you were going to introduce a single payer health care plan literally as soon as we're through with the republican health care debate. it seems like we're through and the obamacare repeal effort has collapsed. are you going to introduce single payer? >> absolutely. of course we are. we're just -- you know, we're tweaking the final points of the bill and we're figuring out how we can mount a national campaign to bring people together.
9:30 am
here's where we are, jake, and it's important for americans to understand this. we are the only major country on earth, the only one, not to guarantee health care to all people. the result is 28 million people who are uninsured. millions of people who are paying deductibles and co-payments that are far too high. and if the republicans had gotten their way, there would have been another 30 or 32 million people thrown off of health insurance. that is crazy. what we should do is move in the direction of every other major country, guarantee health care to all people as a right, not a privilege. second thing you've got to do is ask ourselves a very simple question, which my republican friends and the president does not. why is it that in america per capita we are spending far, far more on health care than do the people of any other country? why are we paying by far the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs compared to people all over the world? those are the issues we've got to tackle. and i think the answer is pretty obvious. what we have now is a health care system not designed to
9:31 am
guarantee health care to all of our people in a cost-effective way. what we have is a dysfunctional, complicated health care system designed to make as much profit as possible for insurance companies and drug companies. and you have the incredible -- >> i want to -- >> go ahead. >> i want to get into single payer, jus auicknote. the 32 million figure that the senator's referring to is from a congressional budget office study of what happens if there was full repeal of obamacare with no replacement. some of those of course are people voluntarily getting off health care because there's no more punishment. but let's talk about single payer because it was attempted in your home state of vermont and it didn't work because they couldn't get the funding because it would be too expensive, the democratic governor said. and recently it failed in california as well. democrats again not able to come up with a way to pay for it. these are cobalt blue states, vermont and california, where people wanted single payer and there were problems because it would cost too much.
9:32 am
how do you make it national if you can't even get it in vermont and california? >> no, no, no. let's, jake, let's be careful about this. >> all right. >> a single payer health care system in my view and according to studies that i have seen would save the average family significant sums of money. and what republicans sometimes do is confuse the issue and they say, well, you're going to pay more in taxes. what they forget to tell you is if you are a family of four now paying $15,000 or $20,000 a year in private health insurance you're not going to be paying that at all. once again, if you look at canada's single payer health care system, per capita, their costs are far, far less than the united states. if you look at the uk, if you look at countries around the world, all of which have different approaches to a national health care system in every instance, they are spending substantially less per capita than we spend in the united states, substantially less for prescription drugs.
9:33 am
the problem with our system is it is so complicated for the consumer, for the doctors, is that a hospital, forample, might be dealing with 15, 20, 30 different insurance policies. it tes an enormous amount of time, energy, and expense to figure out that you have a $5,000 deductible, you have a $10,000 deductible. the goal simply is to say that every person in this country through a single payer system is entitled to a comprehensive health care approach and that will save substantial sums of money in administrative costs, substantial sums of money in lower prescription drug costs, substantial sums of money in doing away with the profiteering of the drug companies. by the way, the five top drug companies in 2015 made $50 billion in profit. the ceos in the health care industry make enormous salaries. we should join the rest of the world, begin that discussion immediately, and i will be introducing legislation to do
9:34 am
just that. >> why couldn't this happen in vermont, then? what's the issue in vermont? vermont would seem to be a perfect test case. >> well, this is -- politically this is difficult. and by the way, in california the debate is not over. it passed i think the senate. it's now gone to the house. and that debate will continue. look, taking on the insurance companies and the drug companies, taking on wall street, taking on a lot of very powerful forces that make billions of dollars a year from the current health care system is not going to be easy. and it's not going to take place until millions of people get involved in the struggle and appreciate the fact that whether you are rish or whether you are poor health care is a right. the idea, the idea that the republicans wanted to throw 32 million people off of health insurance, cut medicaid by $800 billion, raise premiums for older workers, defund planned parenthood, make it almost
9:35 am
impossible for people who have pre-existing conditions get the health care they need, that is abominab abominable. that is moving in exactly the wrong direction. so we need a serious discussion about a serious issue, and i believe at the end of the day the american people will conclude that medicare -- medicare is working now. for people 65 or older. let's expand it to everyone. >> you were asked recently about the possibility of running for president again in 2020. you said, "i am not taking it off the table." on august 31st you're going to be back in iowa, specifically in iowa city, to promote your new book "bernie sanders' guide to political revolution." are you testing the waters for 2020? is it still possible you're going to run for president again? >> i know hard to believe, jake. jake, one of the things that i always get a kick out of is that in canada they have elections i think it's two-month riod. the uk it's even shorter than that. in the united states we have neverendingelections. right now the united states senator from the state of vermont i am dealing with
9:36 am
enormous issues. it's not just health care. trying to create an economy that works for all americans. not just the 1%. it's developing a tax system that does not give huge tax breaks to the wealthiest people in this country. it's rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. it's dealing with climate change, transforming our energy system. those are the issues that i and other members of congress should be dealing with right now. we've got three years before the presidential election. we've got plenty of time for candidates or potential candidates to make decisions. >> i'm going to take that as a yes, it's still on the table. senator bernie sanders, appreciate it. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you very much. another week, another top white house staffer loses his job. are we sure this isn't "the apprentice"? how a flashy and occasionally foul-mouthed west wing newcomer won the latest west wing power struggle. the mooch is loose. next. discover card.
9:37 am
9:38 am
hey. what can you tell me about your new social security alerts? oh! we'll alert you if we find your social security number on any one of thousands of risky sites, so you'll be in the know. ooh. sushi. ugh. being in the know is a good thing. sign up online for free. discover social security alerts. i enjoy the fresher things in life. fresh towels. fresh soaps. and of course, tripadvisor's freshest, lowest prices. so if you're anything like me...'ll want to check tripadvisor. we now instantly compare prices from over 200 booking sites... find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. go on, try something fresh. tripadvisor. the latest reviews.
9:39 am
the lowest prices. i ...prilosec otc 7 years ago,my doctor recommended... 5 years ago, last week. just 1 pill each morning, 24 hours and zero heartburn. it's been the number 1 doctor recommended brand for 10... ...straight years, and it's still recommended today. use as directed. about to see progressive's new home quote explorer. where you can compare multiple quote options online and choose what's right for you. woah. flo and jamie here to see hqx. flo and jamie request entry. slovakia. triceratops. tapioca. racquetball. staccato. me llamo jamie. pumpernickel. pudding. employee: hey, guys! home quote explorer. it's home insurance made easy. password was "hey guys."
9:40 am
9:41 am
when i said we were brothers from the podium, that's because we're rough on each other. some brothers are like cain and abel. >> i guess we now know which one is cain and which one is abel. our panel's here. michael caputo, let me start with you. so i guess scaramucci won this fight between him and reince priebus. >> i'm not sure that's all this is. it's probably some of it. i'm from new york. i'm involved in new york politics. it's a rough and tumble place. you fight with each other, and then you make up and it happens all the time. you know, the new york culture is a little unusual for the white house i guess. but strap in. we've got three more years of this. you're going to see more new york culture. >> and it does seem like in some ways that this is -- if you look at the white house with
9:42 am
different power centers, there's the family power center, there's the new york power center, there's the nationalist power center, and then there's the establishment power center. it looks like the establishment, the rnc folks, are really on their way out. >> it seems to be that way. you know, it's tough to do the kremlinology on this. the very fact we're -- >> i don't know if they would appreciate that term. but -- >> pun totally intended. but that's the smaller issue. the bigger issue is will it change, will we get out of the business of trying to decide which faction is killing another faction in something that's supposed to operate vep efficiently? now we have a new chief of staff and that's going to be the question. will anything change and particularly will the commitments that i think general kelly probably got from the president that you will really be in charge mean anything. >> congressman, we heard mick mulvaney saying today earlier in the show that he hopes that this retired marine general is going to be able to bring some discipline to the white house, that reince priebus for all his strengths maybe was a little more laid back and independent. >> jake, it won't matter whether
9:43 am
it's general kelly or reince priebus, cash mutuali or spicer. the reason the white house is failing is not because of staff. it's because of the president himself. this is like rearranging deck chairs on the titanic. you've got a president who lies, who makes shocking comments on twitter, who has no interest in substantive legislation. things are not going to change. >> congresswoman, you said something about general kelly that was a bit controversial, and i want to give an opportunity for everybody to discuss it and for you to defend it. you said "by putting general john kelly in charge president trump is militarizing the white house and putting our executive branch in the hands of an extremist." first of all there are those who say people who served in the military should be able to integrate back into society. but second of all, why is he -- and perhaps most importantly, why do you think he's an extremist? >> let me first say i come from a military family. my dad served in world war ii and korea. and so i respect and honor the military and recognize the sacrifices that all of our military men and women make as well as general kelly and his history and his sacrifices. what i'm talking about is his
9:44 am
tenure as homeland security secretary and the very extreme policies of promoting family dislocation, deportation of innocent men and women and children, breaking up families, promoting a muslim ban, promoting a wall between the united states and mexico. those are extreme policies. and so this is very troublesome to me, to have this kind of power now centralized in the white house because these are very serious matters and these are extreme policies. but believe you me, as it relates to his service in the military, again, coming from a military family, i recognize and honor the servicemen and women of our country. >> original trump backers gave reen priebus a chance because he really earned it on the campaign trail. he was a real asset to the president. but we've had six months of this and we're all very hopeful now, those of us who backed trump from the very beginning, that general kelly can do a better job of marshaling the white house, the cabinet members and the president himself in selling, selling, selling like he did on the campaign trail.
9:45 am
and general kelly, you know, i'm a vet and i can tell you that i believe that the trump culture is going to respond very well to this. i worked at the convention in the president's office at the convention. we were run by ryan price and david urban, both combat vets. there were zero leaks. there was no infighting. and there was a strict chain of command. i think the trump culture's going to respond well to this. i'm looking forward to seeing the changes it's going to bring. >> the president didn't fire the chief of staff because donald trump's the chief of staff. reince hasn't had any power there since about day 31. so the question is can kelly change trump? does trump even want to be changed? if so we could have a more effective white house. but the keystone cop culture that was created by one guy, he fuels it, he's got all these people with walk-in privileges. everybody's favorite calling card in the white house is i report directly to the president. that's poison in this kind of organization. so with all respect to the congresswoman about militarization, we could use a
9:46 am
little chain of command to try to make this place functional. >> there's another culture problem. i 1e6shd in active duty in the military and there are certain values that were drilled into us such as integrity, loyalty, accountability. i think it's going to be really hard for general kelly in the long term to work for a boss who shows such great disdain for these values. >> i have worked in washington, d.c. as an intern, a staffer, now a member of congress. i've been there through five administrations. i have never seen such chaos and confusion. so i have to tell you, i'm quite concerned about the foul language and the profanity that's coming from the white house that our children are hearing. what do they think? what do they believe? and for me it's very troubling. the president cyber-bullying for example his attorney general. that's wrong. and it just seems that what congressman lieu said is correct, it's got to start at the top. hopefully the president will see he needs some stability for the good of the country. >> profanity in washington. color me shocked. i'm just amazed. >> well, i want to read something to you from the "wall
9:47 am
street journal" which is obviously conservative. it's fair to also say they haven't been the biggest supporters of president trump. i don't think they think he's a conservative, for one. but they say in an op-ed called -- or an editorial, house editorial called "priebus wasn't the problem," "this shuffling of the staff furniture won't matter unless mr. trump accepts that the white house problem isn't mr. priebus, it's him." do you really think that general kelly, secretary kelly, white house chief of staff kelly, whatever you want to call him, will be able to go into the president's office, the oval office, and say mr. president, please stop tweeting. or if you're going to tweet let's have a discussion before you do it because it is an official message and it is undermining what we are trying to do. >> i've known the president for quite a while now, several years, and i know that he responds very, very well to flag officers. it's a group of people that he's very respectful of. i think that if he and general kelly sat down, he certainly had a conversation like mike said, and i trust that the president is going to stand by whatever
9:48 am
commitments he made to the general. this white house could use a marine officer in charge. we all agree about this. i think we're going to see some good things. >> i think the huge question is here, though, that if kelly got that commitment, and i agree the military guys intimidate the president a little bit. the only beach he landed on was studio 54. he sees the brass and he respects it. so the question is how will -- >> you're dating yourself -- >> i know, old references are my specialty. buster keaton, you know, was really -- no, but the point is kelly didn't get four stars in the marines by not knowing strategy. he's got to test it right away. i'm going to put jared's security clearance on suspension till he's cleared. some big tough thing. not only to see if trump meant it, which i think is an uphill bet about him having that power but two, to show washington and corporate there's somebody in charge they can do business with. he's got to prove it. and that's actions. and he's got a quick window to test it right now when the president might actually let him
9:49 am
be in charge or this is all just koz mettic and doesn't mean anything. >> skongsman, i know you're not a supporter of the president. but if you were, just as an american who wants the -- who presumably you want the drama to stop, you want the actual business of governing to be more efficient. what advice would you give the president? >> you know, i remember watching the president's joint address to congress. and afterwards i thought, you know, that's going to make democrats' jobs harder because i thought he gave a good address but as an american i feel better. i want him to go back to that. i want him to make america proud. i don't want him to embarrass us. i think he should stop doing twitter, and i think he should listen to his advisers and then show some interest in legislation. he's shown no interest in the substance of these bills. that's one reason that they've had no legislative accomplishments in his first six months in office. >> congresswoman, listen to this from peggy noonan, another "wall street journal" conservative. she wrote in an op-ed called "trump is a drama queen, "the president's primary problem as laird is not that he's impetuous, brash or naive, it's not that he's inexperienced,
9:50 am
crude, an outsider. it is that he is weak and sniveling." that's pretty harsh. >> that is harsh. let me say the president should work with us to help us create good paying jobs, to help us reduce the cost of living for americans. people are really struggling out there. he needs to work with us to help us reduce the cost of prescription drugs, to actually develop a plan for skills and workforce training and education so that people can get jobs of the 21st century. you know, people need help in terms of the basic standard of living. and so he should work to help us do that, creating infrastructure plan, create economic growth so that people have good paying jobs and not have to struggle and work two jobs and still live below the poverty line. that's what he needs to do. >> you talk to a lot of your voters in your talk radio in buffalo. what do they tell you? what do they want the president to do? >> a lot of them, we really
9:51 am
wanted the repeal and replacement of obamacare, we were promised this by all the republicans in congress, house and senate. and the president resonated that promise across the campaign trail. this is the end of the month. i'm starting to get ready to write my check to the obamacare, which i got off the exchange for our family of four, and i noticed that i still have $8,000 left in my deductible account. $8,000. and we're at the halfway point. we pay over $1,200 a month. republican supporters of donald trump wanted repeal and replace. and if the republicans in the house and in the senate think that they can just leave it in place now and leave it as status quo, they're going to pay at the ballot box. i think a lot of trump supporters also want tax reform. i don't think we really wanted to wait very long for it. there's nothing wrong with this presidency or the republican congress that 3% to 4% annualized growth couldn't fix. >> thanks for being here. great panel. really appreciate it. as sean spicer's time in the white house comes to an end his future job is anyone's guess and some are hoping his next move might be on the dance floor. stay with us.
9:52 am
i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424.
9:53 am
[music playing] across the country, we walk. carrying flowers that signify why we want to end alzheimer's disease. but what if, one day, there was a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor? what if there were millions of them? join us for the alzheimer's association walk to end alzheimer's. register today at it's just a burst pipe, i co(laugh) it. no. with claim rateguard your rates won't go up just because of a claim. i totally could've - no! switching to allstate is worth it.
9:54 am
you give us comfort. and we give you bare feet... i love you, couch. ...backsweat and gordo's everything. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze fabric refresher with odorclear technology... ...cleans away odors like never before. because the things you love the most can stink. and plug in febreze to keep your whole room fresh for up... 45 days. breathe happy with new febreze.
9:55 am
white house briefings were appointment viewing. so what is sean spicer planning for an encore? is it possible what we read in the paper is true? maybe "dancing with the stars"? that's this week's state of the cartoonian. sure, sean spicer attempted to dance around reporters' questions. >> we're going to raise our hands like big boys and girls. >> but would he really be able to spin on an actual dance floor on "dancing with the stars"? now that anthony scaramucci has cut in. >> i wish him well and i hope he goes on to make a tremendous amount of money. >> a little creativity and you can envision spicy spicing it up. >> i'll do a little hip-hop, then dash behind the door. >> to the spice girls perhaps. if he does join "dancing with the stars" hopefully he'll fare better than trump energy secretary rick perry. >> people are probably watching this going what a dumb-ass.
9:56 am
>> for now sean spicer's staying mum on his next job. >> hey, sean. >> sean! >> sean. >> but odds are if he does put on his dancing shoes he could get support from someone who has withheld it so far. >> the ratings are so high that i don't know what these networks are going to do. they're going to start to cry. >> thanks for watching. "fareed zakaria gps" is next. not at night. rk. only tempur-breeze® mattresses use an integrated system of technologies to keep you cool while you sleep. ultra-breathable support layers channel heat away from your body. purecool technology delivers cooling comfort you can feel. and the performance cover is cool to the touch. so you sleep cool and wake up feeling powerful. only exclusive retailers carry breeze. find yours at ykeep you that's why you drink ensure.
9:57 am
with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. booking a flight doesn't have to be expensive. just go to priceline. it's the best place to book a flight a few days before my trip and still save up to 40%. just tap and go. and while i'm gone i can even check on my baby with this doggie cam. oh jack, you're such a good boy. no, jack, what are you doing? bad dog! and if you need to get back home, like right now, priceline has you covered. finally partner. our own hmmhmmmmmm. selfie? yeah!
9:58 am
ok. desk in the background. ok. best day ever. (crash!!!!) when the unexpected strikes... don't worry. we've got you covered. the hartford strikes back.
9:59 am
10:00 am
this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. today on the show, the white house in disarray. warring with the attorney general, leakers and senators. what does all this mean for


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on