tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN October 16, 2017 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
to blame myself. he goes after democrats as well, slamming them as obstructests. >> hazardous water. desperate puerto ricans are drinking potentially dangerous water from a site. while president trump insists massive supplies are being sent to the island. why is he blames locals for shortages. >> and hillary, please run. president trump implores hillary clinton to take him on again in 2020 calling her a poor candidate and calling her statement on kneeling nfl players disrespectful. why is the president still bringing up his former rival and comparing himself to barack obama as well? we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." breaking news tonight.
president trump and senate majority leader mitch mcconnell putting aside weeks of public discord to hold an impromptu news conference following a white house lunch. they're teaming up to push tax reform, which the president is now tying directly to republican fortunes in next year's midterm election. and the president is insisting he's closer than ever to mcconnell despite his repeated public criticism of the majority leader. the president also told reporters he would try to talk former chief strategist steve bannon out of his efforts to unseat establishment republicans including mcconnell. but just hours earlier, the president appears to support bannon's insurgency, which included blistering attacks on mcconnell over the weekend. despite the show of unity with the majority leader, the president says congressional republicans are not getting the job done when it comes to advancing his agenda, specifically citing the failure to repeal and replace obamacare. the president has been criticized for not making a stronger public push for the gop
effort. but he says, and i'm quoting him now, i'm not going to blame myself. and tonight, the president is blaming local distribution efforts in puerto rico for ongoing food and water shortages, almost a month after hurricane maria devastated the island. the president says what he calls massive amounts of food and water are being sent to puerto rico, but he says it's up to local officials to get it to the residents. we're covering all of that and much more this hour with our guests, including senator richard blumenthal of the judiciary and armed services committees and our correspondents and specialists are also standing by. let's begin with the president's show of unity today with the senate majority leader, mitch mcconnell. our white house correspondent sara murray is joining us with the latest. they're uniting to push tax reform, despite previous public tensions. >> reporter: that's right, wolf. in a free-wheeling press conference, president trump touted his legislative agenda and appeared next to the man key
getting it through the congress, and insisted there's no bad blood here. president trump maintaining tenuous ties with his own party today. appearing to defend his conservative ally steve bannon's efforts to unseat republicans in one moment. >> i know how he feels. depends on who you're talking about. there are some republicans, frankly, that should be ashamed of themselves. >> and softening his approach just hours later. saying his former chief strategist, who is taking aim at sitting gop senators, may need to adjust his targets. >> steve is doing what steve thinks is the right thing. some of the people that he may be looking at, i'm going to see if we talk him out of that because frankly they're great people. >> trump set an about face when it comes to party loyalty. >> just so you understand, the republican party is very, very unified. >> after, he had lunch with mitch mcconnell and appeared alongside him in the rose garden. >> my relationship with this gentleman is outstanding. has been outstanding.
>> while trump may be touting a warm relationship, mcconnell remains one of bannon's key foils. >> we've cut your oxygen off, mitch. >> as he declares open season on the gop. >> right now, it's a season of war against a gop establishment. >> as for the majority leader, he's standing by the incumbent crowd and warning that bannon's efforts represent a recipe for failure. >> you have to nominate people who can actually win because winners make policy and losers go home. >> both trump and mcconnell making clear their uneasy alliance is necessary to notch a major legislative win like tax reform and keep control of the house and senate. >> we have races coming up, as you know, in a year from now. i think we're going to probably do very well. i can say this, if we get taxes approv approved, we're going to do unbelievably well. >> this even as the president insists it's congress that should shoulder the blame for the slow pace of progress so far. >> we're not getting the job done. and i'm not going to blame
myself, i'll be honest. they are not getting the job done. we have had health care approved, and then you had a surprise vote by john mccain. we've had other things happen, and they're not getting the job done. >> while trump may believe his fate is safe regardless, republicans in and outside the white house tell cnn they don't believe the president fully grasps his feuds with the gop and lack of legislative achievements could put his presidency in peril. if the gop loses the house in 2018, republicans fear the rest of trump's first term could be buried by democrat-led investigations into russian involvement in 2016 and ultimately impeachment proceedings. leaving republicans to sound the alarm that a fractured republican party will ultimately bring everyone down. >> mitch mcconnell is not our problem. our problem is that we promised to repeal and replace obamacare and we failed. we promised to cut taxes and we have yet to do it. if we're successful, mitch mcconnell is fine.
if we're not, we're all in trouble. we lose our majority, and i think president trump will not get re-elected. >> now, the white house insists that president trump is keenly aware of the risks his presidency could face if democrats retake control of the house. they say they're not taking a defeatist attitude and the president will be out there fighting to maintain the gop majority. back to you. >> sara, thank you. the president voiced optimism about passing tax reform this year, but also acknowledged the challenge and the stakes republicans are now facing. >> i would like to see it be done this year, john. i would like very much to see it be done this year. so we won't go a step further. if we get it done, that's a great achiefment. don't forget, it took years for the reagan administration to get taxes done. i have been here for nine months, a little more than nine months. i can say the same thing for health care. if you look at obama, first of all, you look at clinton, they weren't able to get it done. you look at other administrations, they weren't able to get it done.
president obama, after a long period of time, was able to finally push it through, but push through something that is now failed. really failing badly. but again, we're meeting democrat, republican, are meeting right now, and right now, they're working on something very special. i have to tell you, i really believe that we have a very good chance. >> let's bring in our congressional correspondent phil mattingly up on capitol hill. phil, is the president right? will tax reform get done this year? >> reporter: wolf, when you talk to congressional leaders, both republican and democrats, they're willing to acknowledge a reason the full scale tax overhaul hasn't been done in 31 years. ten weeks not a lot to time of complete it, currently as it stands republicans are working with nine-page framework. they haven't moved it through the house or senate. it's worth noting when you talk to republican aides who are deeply involved in the process, they talk about a few things in their favor. unlike health care, the house, senate, and white house have been working behind closed doors
on this proposal, on the legislative language for months. on top of this, this is what you hear more than anything when you talk to rank and file members, the political imperative, you heard it from linldy graham, from the president, from the senate majority leader themselves. they recognize in the wake of health care's failure, if they don't achieve a cornerstone domestic achievement like tax reform, they would walk into the 2018 midterms in a big, big problem. with major, major issues. here's the kind of bigger picture, wolf, right now as it currently stands. tax reform is very hard. there's a reason it hasn't been done in a long time. the details here matter immensely. it's heart to say at this point in time with ten weeks left in the year and nine-page framework, the recognition this is something for their agenda that matters, the really in the weeds details that have sunk the efforts year after year after year, at least at this point, republican leaders hope maybe they can be glossed over. >> let's see what happens. phil, thank you. phil mattingly on capitol hill.
let's get more on this. democratic senator richard blumenthal is joining us. he's a member of the judiciary and armed services committees. thank you for joining us. >> thank you. >> the president said the only thing you guys, the democrats, are good at is being obstructionists. can you prove him wrong and work with republicans and get something significant done for the american people? >> absolutely, wolf. in fact, there are talks ongoing right now between senator alexander and senator murray that -- >> lamar alexander, the chairman of the committee, and patty murray, the ranking democrat. >> exactly. i'm very supportive and have been involved in a number of these meetings. and there could well be a meeting of the minds that advances and builds on the affordable care act without repeal and replace, which is cruel and irrational. and on tax reform. >> by the way, on that, patty murray, lamar alexander legislation, it looks like an interim measure, the president might even go along with it.
>> and he should because what will be produced is bipartisan compromise. you know, compromise is not a four-letter word. there's no reason that republicans and democrats cannot work together on health care reform, on tax reform, but it is difficult, in fact impossible, to do if republicans say that they're doing it without democrats. which has been their approach, and they are divided, which is why none of this has happened so far. >> i assume you want to work with the president to reduce the cost of prescription drugs for americans. he correctly points out that the same prescription drug, the cost in the united states is a lot more than the same drug costs in canada or england or europe or elsewhere. i assume you want to work with him on that. >> not only do i want to work with the president, i have been crusading, campaigning, championing lowering the cost of pharmaceutical drugs. >> why is that? why does the same drug cost so much more in the united states than in this other countries? >> there are a complex set of
reasons, but the emphasis on marketing, raising the cost of those prescription drugs, the absence of breakthroughs on new prescription drugs, is due to the emphasis on marketing and advertising, and i think also, the monopolistic control that maybe the drug companies have over those prices. they're a complex set of factors, but bringing down the cost of health care has to be the priority and particularly pharmaceutical drugs. >> do you think some of your democratic colleagues in the senate will work and eventually support the president's tax cut, tax reform plans? >> not as currently advanced, which is just a framework, a very vague one at that, for example, benefitting the top 1% at the expense of working class families is a nonstarter. eliminating the deduction for state and local property taxes, particularly impactful on my state of connecticut and the northeast, and many other
states, and destroying medicare and medicaid as the price of tax cuts, corporate tax cuts, i think, will be a nonstarter. there are areas -- >> he wants the corporate rate to go down from 35% to 20%, to make the u.s. corporations more competitive with their international competition. what's wrong with that? >> there are areas where we can agree and that's one of them, as long as the benefits go to ordinary americans, and they see real tax cuts. and here's another area, wolf, where i think the president has missed a tremendous opportunity. tax cuts and tax reform should be tied to infrastructure investment. roads, bridges, rail, ports, airports, v.a. facilities, broadband, all can be supported. and there can be investment as a result of tax reform. for example, repatriation of a lot of those dollars parked overseas, if there are incentives provided those
corporations, not just giveaways and tax breaks. >> the president said he removed those subsidies as part of the affordable care act because that money was strictly going as a bonanza to the big insurance companies who are making huge profits right now, and he wants to eliminate that. that's why he got rid of the subsidies. you buy that? >> that contention is disproved by the facts. the cuts in those subsidies were very simply and starkly an effort to sabotage the affordable care act. >> but the insurance companies do make a lot of profit. >> and those profits should be overseen and stopped if they are involved in higher costs because bringing down costs has to be part of what's done. i have long advocated that there be stronger regulatory oversight in connecticut has seen some of those price increases as well. if there are excess profit said, they ought to be part of the regulatory process. >> let's talk about national security while i have you. the president said today that
when he visits south korea next month, part of an asian trip, he may go up to the demilleterized zone, but he may not. he was asked if it was provocative. should he visit troops along the dmz, which i think all other presidents have done while he's in south korea, or will it be too provocative and anger the north korean regime? >> well, i think that our u.s. troops, which so ably serve and sacrifice for our country, should be visited by the president wherever they are, and no one should be intimidated, least of all the president, to visit our troops in south korea or anywhere in the world. but that is not to say that all of what the current administration is doing, vis-a-vis north korea, is absolutely right. in fact, there has been no real plan or strategy for diplomatic effort or use of more aggressive sanctions. and i would like to see that visit coupled with an effort to
mobilize the world community in truly cutting down on the supply of components that are necessary for the north koreans to develop their missiles. >> a very tense situation on the korean peninsula right now. iraq also very tense right now. there seems to be a significant clash going on in the northern part of iraq between kurdish forces and iraqi military, some of those iraqi military backed by iranian supported militia. the president today was asked about it. he said the u.s. shouldn't take sides in this conflict. but potentially, this is a very, very serious setback for the unity of iraq. >> very serious setback for the unity of iraq, but equally important for our fight against isis. two of our allies in that effort, iraq and the kurds, the peshmerga, which have been ferocious fighters, are involved in this fight among themselves. and we ought to be mediating. we ought to take an active role
in trying to bring together these two allies so we focus on the enemy that we share, not fighting among ourselves. >> yeah, a very, very serious development. what's going on there in iraq right now. much more on that coming up. stand by. we've got other breaking news we're following. we'll have more with senator blumenthal right after this. watch me. ♪ i've tried lots of things for my joint pain. now? watch me. ♪ think i'd give up showing these guys how it's done? please. real people with active psoriatic arthritis are changing the way they fight it... they're moving forward with cosentyx®. it's a different kind of targeted biologic. it's proven to help people find less joint pain and clearer skin. don't use if you are allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur.
tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms of an infection. or if you have received a vaccine, or plan to. if you have inflammatory bowel disease tell your doctor if symptoms develop or worsen. serious allergic reactions may occur. with less joint pain, watch me. for less joint pain and clearer skin, ask your rheumatologist about cosentyx. hey hun, huh! we gotta go. come on. ♪ "grandma! grandpa!" ♪ thanks mom. here we are. look, right up to here.
our recent online sales success seems a little... strange?nk na. ever since we switched to fedex ground business has been great. they're affordable and fast... maybe "too affordable and fast." what if... "people" aren't buying these books online, but "they" are buying them to protect their secrets?!?! hi bill. if that is your real name. it's william actually. hmph! affordable, fast fedex ground. >> tech: so you think this chip is nothing to worry about? well at safelite, we know sooner or later every chip will crack. these friends were on a trip when their windshield got chipped. so they scheduled at safelite.com. they didn't have to change their plans or worry about a thing. i'll see you all in a little bit. and i fixed it right away with a strong repair they can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> tech: being there whenever you need us that's another safelite advantage.
investigating the russian election interference, but the president added and i'm quoting him now, i would like to see it end. we're back with democratic senator richard blumenthal, a member of the judiciary and armed services committees. he insists there was no colushz. he says the whole investigation is just an excuse by you democrats to come up with an explanation why hillary clinton lost and he won. what's your reaction to what the predsaid today? >> i'm glad that he says he's not about to fire the special counsel, which we suspected he might do, which is the reason we sponsored legislation, bipartisan legislation, by the way, to make sure that the special counsel could not be fired without a court order. and the claims about the investigation being a witch hunt or a hoax or partisanship, disproved by the fact of the investigation and what's been uncovered so far. there's no question that the russians interfered on a massive scale with our election. the question is whether the
trump campaign colluded with the russians and that's the topic for the special counsel to investigate, and he's proceeding very vigorously and diligently with that investigation. and at the same time, possible obstruction of justice by the president of the united states, very serious charge. >> which do you think has a greater potential to result in charges? let's say obstruction of justice or collusion? >> at this point, we're a ways from completing the investigation. and i have no insight or private information about what special counsel is doing, but i think they both must be investigated. i have a lot of confidence in the integrity and the ability of special counsel bob mueller to pursue this evidence and following it wherever it may lead, and at the same time, the judiciary committee where i sit and the intelligence committees of both the house and senate are pursuing our investigation, because remember, we have responsibility to legislate to prevent the kind of massive
attack on our democratic process that occurred, including using facebook, google, the ads and posts there, and the lesson here is the russians will do it again unless they are made to pay a price. and anybody who colluded with them. >> an interesting new nugget came out. yahoo news reporting that russian trolls were required to study and watch the netflix series "house of cards" to hone their messaging to try to foment discontent and anger within the united states. you're smiling when i'm talking about that. but this is potentially a very serious development. >> you know, we failed to take, i think, seriously enough how absolutely sinister and sophisticated the russian use of facebook and other social media was. this kind of digital attack on our democracy goes to the core of who we are and open and
democratic process. and of course, they tried to hack into the election machines as well. so we need to learn all the lessons we can and pursue criminality if there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russians. >> is it your sense that the russians were primarily seeking to stoke discontent, disruption here in the united states, or were they actually thinking they could help defeat hillary clinton and elect donald trump? >> my personal view is they were doing both. which they set as a priority may have changed over time as they saw donald trump as a more and more viable candidate, but having viewed those facebook and google posts and ads and twitter, i think that their goal was both to destabilize and disrupt our democracy and sow discord, but to also intervene in the election on the side of donald trump.
>> they clearly were going after hillary clinton. they assumed she would win because the polls suggested she probably would win. but if she won, they wanted her to be as weak and divisive as possible. that's just the assessment that i have heard from u.s. intelligence officials. all right, a lot more we need to discuss, but we can't do it right now. we'll take a quick break. there's more news we're following. senator, thanks very much for joining us. president trump criticizes congressional republicans for failing to repeal obamacare and not advancing his agenda. should the president have done more? >> and i'm not going to blame myselfering i'll be honest. they are not getting the job done. h veterans, both served in the navy. i do outrank my husband, not just being in the military, but at home. she thinks she's the boss. she only had me by one grade. we bought our first home together in 2010. his family had used another insurance product but i was like well i've had usaa for a while, why don't we call and check the rates? it was an instant savings and i should've changed a long time ago. there's no point in looking elsewhere really. we're the tenneys and we're usaa members for life.
usaa. get your insurance quote today. ♪ do you want clean, stain free dentures? try polident. the four in one cleaning system kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria, cleans where brushing may miss. helps remove stains and prevent stain build up. use polident daily. when you're close to the people you love, does psoriasis ever get in the way of a touching moment? if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, you can embrace the chance of completely clear skin with taltz. taltz is proven to give you a chance at completely clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of patients had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. in fact, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. do not use if you are allergic to taltz. before starting you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you are being treated for an infection or have symptoms.
or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz. including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. now's your chance at completely clear skin. just ask your doctor about taltz. now's your chance at completely clear skin. how much money do you think you'll need in retirement? then we found out how many years that money would last them. how long do you think we'll keep -- oooooohhh! you stopped! you're gonna leave me back here at year 9? how did this happen? it turned out, a lot of people fell short, of even the average length of retirement. we have to think about not when we expect to live to, but when we could live to. let's plan for income that lasts all our years in retirement. prudential. bring your challenges. (hard exhalation) honey? can we do this tomorrow? (grunts of effort) can we do this tomorrow? if you have heart failure symptoms,
your risk of hospitalization could increase, making tomorrow uncertain. but entresto is a medicine that was proven, in the largest heart failure study ever, to help more people stay alive and out of the hospital than a leading heart failure medicine. women who are pregnant must not take entresto. it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren. if you've had angioedema while taking an ace or arb medicine, don't take entresto. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high potassium in your blood. ♪ tomorrow, tomorrow... ♪ when can we do this again, grandpa? well, how about tomorrow? ask your doctor about entresto and help make tomorrow possible.
breaking news this hour. a show of unity and claims of camaraderie by president trump and the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell, despite the president's recent public criticism of mcconnell, he touted their friendship when they appeared together in the rose garden following a white house lunch. >> we are probably now despite what we read, we're probably now, i think, at least as far as i'm concerned, closer than ever before. and the relationship is very good. we're fighting for the same thing. we're fighting for lower taxes, big tax cuts. the biggest tax cuts in the history of our nation. we're fighting for tax reform as part of that. we are getting close to health care. it will come up in the early to mid part of next year. we're going to have a vote.
i think we already have the votes. we feel confident we have the votes. >> let's dig deeper with our contributors and our specialists. gloria, how significant was this public display by the president and the majority leader? >> well, wolf, it's obviously an arranged marriage, and it's a marriage of convenience as well for now. and it will be there until it's not. i mean, just look at what happened today. the president in the morning with his cabinet said, you know, i understand how steve bannon feels, and of course, steve bannon, his former adviser, is talking about primarying and challenging all of these senate republicans because he said i share his frustration. and when he went out after lunch with mitch mcconnell, it was all about, we have to take control of the senate. we're very, very close. and mitch mcconnell came out anded, look, i'm all about control of the senate, and i don't want a repeat of 2010 and 2012 when we ran these lousy candidates and we lost and suddenly the president was with
him. so i think the president's a great performance artist, and i think that in the afternoon, he was with mitch. and in the morning, he was with steve bannon. >> gloria makes a good point, ryan. you remember the 2010 elections, the 2012 elections. the republicans who were nominated who wound up in the general election losing to democrats in the senate. mitch mcconnell remembers that very, very vividly, but you know, the president remembers very vividly what happened in alabama more recently. i'm sure that's going to influence him. >> that's right. a lot of republicans think they should have taken back the senate before they did in 2014 because they lost a lot of good opportunities in '10 and '12. in '14 and '16, they thought they sort of figured out how to contain some of the bannonite forces that haunted them in '10 and '12, and here we are in the run-up to '18 and it seems like mitch mcconnell is going to have a very aggressive populist
grassroots challenges to a lot of the incumbents. bannon is committed to not endorsing any primary opponent who will back mitch mcconnell as majority leader. so this is very, very personal to mcconnell himself. i think idealogically, bannon and some of his allies don't care who the candidates are they back, they want them to be more conservative, more trump like in their views, but the real enemy is for whatever reason, is mcconnell personally. and trump is sort of caught in between these two. he has sometimes, not to pick on bannon too much, but this sort of devil on one shoulder and the angel on the other shoulder, and trump now finds himself in the middle, trying to be the leader of these, this party with these two forces. >> bannon basically wants every republican incumbent senator except ted cruz to be challenged in a republican primary going forward. the president, he emphasized the need, david, for the republicans
to deliver this year on tax reform. but earlier, he made it clear what he had -- what his views are on previous legislative failures. >> despite what the press writes, i have great relationships with actually many senators, but in particular, with most republican senators. but we're not getting the job done. and i'm not going to blame myself, i'll be honest. they are not getting the job done. >> it's not necessarily what we often hear from presidents. i'm not going to blame myself. they're the ones who are to blame. >> to gloria's point, wolf, part of what president trump wanted to do today was sound like a pragmatist. on the other hand, to ryan's point, he wanted to sound like someone who was antiestablishment, talking about what bannon wants to do going after mitch mcconnell. part of the problem for president trump, wolf, is embedded in that comment is the reason he doesn't get along with a lot of people on the hill. he won't take any responsibility for the legislative failures. there's some fence mending going
on. played golf two weekends in a row with senator graham. clearly, they're trying to work things out in the republican party, but he keeps doing things to alienate him. >> after two weeks, the president today fineomy commented on the four green berets, the four american military personnel killed in niger. he said he hasn't yet talked to their families. he's planning to do so. he also said this. listen. >> the toughest calls i have to make are the calls where this happens. soldiers are killed. it's a very difficult thing. it gets to a point where, you know, you make four or five of them in one day, it's a very, very tough day. for me, that's by far the toughest. so the traditional way, if you look at president obama and other presidents, most of them didn't make calls. a lot of them didn't make calls. >> which is not necessarily true.
and the president backtracked later, suggesting, well, that's what his advisers told him. your reaction. >> boy, a tough day for the president. how about the families who accepted a child or father or spouse home in a casket. it's not a tough day for them? this guy has the empathy of a cochroach. from the day after his inauguration when he showed up at my agencies, the former agency, the cia, in front of the wall of fallen hero said and spoke about the size of his inauguration. fast forwarding it now, what nine months, and he can't figure out his responsibility, not only at the commander in chief, buzz at the consoler in chief is to tell the families it's not about me. it's not about donald trump. it's about 330 million americans saying thank you for having someone in your family who sacrificed your life for the flag. i just -- i can't understand why that message is so hard to learn coming from the background i did. when you look at people who serve overseas and who give their lives, he's supposed to say something simple.
we love what they did for this country. we empathize with the families and we stand with you. maybe even going to dover air force base to salute those caskets as they come home. all he can say is my job is tough, and the guys who came before me like president obama also didn't do too well in these circumstances. i just don't get it. >> president obama did meet with families of military personnel who died in action. all right, everybody stick around. we have a lot more coming up. we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. a dairy cow that talks to farmers?
what kind of sorcery is that? it's not the magic-wand kind. it's the rfid-collar-and- internet of things-kind we created with chitale dairy. so every cow can let farmers know how she feels and what she needs to be healthier- (phone vibrates) all with a simple text. tah-dah. magic can't make digital transformation happen. but we can. that's the power of vmware, part of dell technologies.
(i wanted him to eat healthy., so i feed jake purina cat chow naturals indoor, a nutritious formula with no artificial flavors. made specifically for indoor cats. purina cat chow. nutrition to build better lives. hey. what can you tell me about your new social security alerts? oh! we'll alert you if we find your social security number on any one of thousands of risky sites, so you'll be in the know. ooh. sushi. ugh. being in the know is a good thing. sign up online for free. discover social security alerts.
we're following breaking news. president trump says he's not, repeat, not considering firing the special counsel robert mueller in the russia investigation. gloria, i thought that was a significant statement. the president alt the same time said this whole investigation is simply an excuse for the democrats to explain why hillary clinton lost. he also says there's no conclusion. he hopes this investigation ends very quickly. >> i think it was important that he said he doesn't want to fire mueller, period, end of sentence. very clear that the strategy from inside the white house is to cooperate with mueller, get him all the documents that they possibly can, not criticize him, say they respect him, they respect his team, and therefore, the president was completely doing what they want him to do, which is to say no, i'm not thinking of firing him. however, when it comes to the whole premise of the russia
investigation, the president hasn't changed at all. from his tweets that it's a hoax and that it's an excuse for the democrats, you know, he said that. he said that today, and that's his story, and he's sticking to it. but as for mueller, he's leaving him alone. he's not tweeting about him, as you notice, since i think the middle of the summer. >> he may be listening to his lawyer's advice. >> definitely. >> phil, you're smiling. you used to work at not just the cia but the fbi as well. what did you think of the president's statement? >> i'm looking at this and i'm with gloria. i think the president would like to fire him, but he sees no option. if you're sitting at the fbi, as i did, you're sitting there saying there's no way you can fire the fbi director and be in the midst of an investigation asking whether you obstructed justice and then fire the guy who is investigating the obstruction of justice. i'm not saying the president likes robert mueller. i think he's looking at this saying, boy, i would like to get out of this. boy, i'd like to take him on
"the apprentice" and fire him, but as soon as i do this, i learned when i fired the fbi director, i'll be in hotter water. >> what do you think, ryan? >> there's a consensus that the biggest political mistake he made was firing the fbi director. that's something that steve bannon, his former political strategist, has said. his -- trump's approval rating has been stuck at about 37%, right about since that time. and it's opened up a can of worms, including obviously the obstruction of justice investigation that mueller is now pursuing. so if you're being investigated for obstruction of justice by one of the most respected people in law enforcement, for firing the former fbi director, you probably don't want to repeat the mistake with that person, and plus, there was no real plan for what happens after you fire mueller. this line of succession at the justice department is not veer clear that it would benefit trump. sessions has recused himself.
rosenstein would have to recuse himself. it seems like it was never really a viable option and would make things worse. >> and the special counsel, as you know, david, he's moving full speed ahead. he's spent a few hours, his lawyers, interviewing the former white house chief of staff, reince priebus, on friday. >> yeah, which suggests that they're really covering all their bases and trying to see not just if there's collusion with russia on part of the trump camp, but also obstruction of justice. i also agree with everybody, the more people they get fired, the less plausible deniability there is about reasons why. >> and don't forget, the white house has really just finished its document production. that takes a while. so they can't exactly say to the special counsel hurry up when they have just sort of finished their end here, which is long and complicated to do. and so now, mueller has the documents. starting to do his interviews. and all the attorneys want to do is kind of stay out of his way at this point and let him do his work, and the last thing they want their client to do, the
president, is antagonize him. >> phil, what did you think of that yahoo news report that russian trolls were told, you're required to watch "house of cards" on netflix to hone your messaging, the messaging being to try to sow discontent in the united states? >> fascinating. let me give you a simple reason why. i made a mistake, wolf. i thought russian intervention last year was about the election. this seems humorous. it's much more profound. it's about sowing discontent in america so americans on the left and right spend more time fighting each other than they think about russian activities overseas in terms of russian intervention in places like crimea. if you're looking at america and you want to find those vulnerabilities to exploit, you mentioned "house of cards." as an intelligence officer, i would add "saturday night live" watch the nightly talk shows, late night, 11:00, 11:30. watch what happens on right wing
and left wing news sites. america wears their vulnerability on their sleeve. watch tv and you'll find it. >> yeah. all right, guys. there's interesting stuff, and i agree that this was designed to try to sow discontent here in the united states. the russians have been trying to do that in the soviet union and since the collapse of the soviet union, continues to this day. we'll have much more on the breaking news. president trump responds to allegations of sexual assault, and a subpoena issued to the trump campaign. >> all i can say is it's totally fake news. just fake. it's fake. it's made up stuff. and it's disgraceful what happens, but that happens in the world of politics. like new savory grilled mediterranean shrimp. and new sweet and spicy nashville hot shrimp. plus our classics like garlic shrimp scampi. try as much as you want however you want 'em, but don't wait, it ends soon. you know what's difficult? adulting...
hi, guys. i'm back. time to slay! no,i have a long time girlfriend. you know what's easy? building your website with godaddy. get your domain today and get a free trial of gocentral. build a better website in under an hour. [he has a new business teaching lessons. rodney wanted to know how his business was doing... ...so he got quickbooks. it organizes all his accounts, so he can see his bottom line. ahhh...that's a profit. know where you stand instantly. visit quickbooks-dot-com. hey hun, huh! we gotta go. come on. ♪ "grandma! grandpa!" ♪ thanks mom. here we are. look, right up to here. principal. we can help you plan for that.
>> tech: so you think this chip is nothing to worry about? well at safelite, we know sooner or later every chip will crack. these friends were on a trip when their windshield got chipped. so they scheduled at safelite.com. they didn't have to change their plans or worry about a thing. i'll see you all in a little bit. and i fixed it right away with a strong repair they can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> tech: being there whenever you need us that's another safelite advantage. >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.
president trump says allegations of sexual assault by a former contestant are fake and made up. lawyers for the woman have now subpoenaed the trump campaign. >> it is a wide ranging subpo a subpoena. asking the trump campaign too hand over all documents related to the campaign last year. trump's attorneys are saying
that request is way too broad. and they're trying to get a defamation suit brought by one accuser dismissed. >> a cascade of allegations that donald trump sexually assaulted them over the years. >> then candidate trump promised to take them to court. >> all of these liars will be sued after the election is over. >> reporter: the president has not sued, but his repeated bashing of his accusers during the campaign. >> when you looked at that horrible woman last night, you said, i don't think so. >> every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign. total fabrication. >> has prompted accuser and former apprentice star summer zerbos to sue him for defamation in january. as first reported by buzz feed, her lawyer issued a wide ranging subpoena in march, to the president's campaign, seeking,
all documents concerning any woman who asserted that donald trump touched her inappropriately, including any basis for donald j. trump's statements that any such woman or women fabricated, created or lied about her interactions with him. >> part of their argument is, that the president is legally immune from being sued because he is president. we respond with the case of paula jones versus president clinton. the u.s. supreme court indicated no man is kbov the law. >> the supreme court did allow paula jones trial to proceed. president trump says this is a different circumstance.
miss allred seeks defaming information. how could the president run the country if faced with broad discovery. >> people who oppose me often will attack me personally, which is usually a sign that they don't have a good argument against the merits of my argument. >> whether it's in entertainm t entertainment, politics. we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the oval office, there has to be a recognition that we must stand against this kind of action that is so sexist and misogynistic. >> the president pushed back from the rose garden against the reports of the subpoenas on his campaign. >> all i can say is it's fake news, it's fake, it's made up
stuff. it's disgraceful what happens. that happens in the world of politics. >> the president's lawyers are fighting the defamation suit brought by summer. they're saying the only purpose for the lawsuit is to get broad discovery that could be used in "impeachment hearings" to distract from the president's agenda, there's a motion pending to dismiss the case outright, it's up to the new york state court whether to let it proceed. wolf? >> thank you, jessica schneider. we'll see where the legal steps go next. president trump is blaming local distribution efforts and hurricane ravaged puerto rico for the shortage of water and food. the president said, plenty of supplies are getting to the island. >> we've delivered tremendous amounts of water, you have to have distribution of the water by the people on the island. we have massive amounts of water, we have massive amounts of food, but they have to distribute the food and they have to do this, they have to
distribute the food to the people of the island. >> let's go do id lavandera. some island residents are so desperate, i understand, they're drinking potentially contaminated water from a toxic cleanup site? >> we spent some considerable amount of time over the last couple days investigating this, this is an area in a town called dorado, just west of san juan. epa officials spent the weekend gathering water samples from a half dozen water wells on what is known as a super fund site. these are sites designated by the epa, as some of the most contaminated pieces of land in the country. since the storm, we've heard reports that there are a number of people who have been accessing some of these water wells for drinking water and water for their toilets and that sort of thing. epa officials gathering those water samples, they say the
results from those samples will start coming back tomorrow. the results won't be back until next week. we spoke with one of our epa officials. >> how concerned are you about what might happen to them? >> we're concerned because it's not absolutely clean pure water. there are some contaminants. we're not saying someone is in immediate danger by drinking this water. we're considering it a long term risk. >> reporter: after our report started airing earlier today, we went back to those water wells and four of the six have been placed at the water wells, preventing people from accessing those water wells. two of them have been deemed clear for use that they have not found levels of contaminants that are worrisome, so that work continues. the governor here in puerto rico
says if those wells pass the clean water act, they will continue to use them. >> what about -- >> if it's nondrinking water, queer n we're not going to be serving it. >> the results of those epa testing will start coming back as early as tomorrow, on the biological part of it. the more serious component, the chemical con tanl nation we're told those results won't be back until early next week. >> you spoke to some of the people that have started to drink that contaminated water and they're complaining of stomach pain and other ailments, is that right? >> yeah, we found after we had witnesses the epa take out their walter samples, there were two men that came up, got inside the caged up air area and started taking unite water.
we spoke to their mother who told us she had been kind of feeling stock market ago pains over the last two weeks, it's impossible to tell at this point if that is connectsed to the drinking water and the water she's been drinking over the last couple weeks, there's clear enough concern here tonight that glau guards are placed at those water wells. >> let's hope for the best. ed lavandera, thanks very much. erin burnett out front starts right now. steve bannon wreaking havoc in the gop, whispering in president trump's ear. president trump today seas cuba is to blame for the sonic attacks. is that the truth? interrupt famously threw rolls of paper towels when he visited this puerto rican town, tonight we go back and ask, did trump's team deliver all the help they promised? let's go "outfront.