tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN November 8, 2017 2:00pm-3:00pm PST
and twitter @jaketapper. that's it for "the lead." i'm jake tapper. i turn you over to wolf blitzer. he's right next door in "the situation room." thanks for watching. happening now. breaking news. trust deficit. one year after a surprise election victory, our exclusive new cnn poll shows almost two-thirds of americans say their confidence in president trump has decreased and he doesn't deserve re-election. what's the one bright spot for the president in the sea of plummeting numbers? clean sweep. decisive victories for democrats in elections in virginia, new jersey and across the country. one republican lawmaker calls it a referendum on president trump. what does it bode for the gop in next year's midterms and efforts to pass health care and tax reform? mission to china. president trump travels to beijing and receives a warm welcome in a country he once
accused of raping the united states. now his harsh rhetoric is being replaced for calls to help contain north korea. how will china respond to the president's new overtures of friendship? and granddaddy issues. president trump gets personal in a new attack on north korea's kim jong-un, going after his grandfather, a man the current dictator tries to emulate. now, north korea is lashing back, calling the president a, quote, lunatic old man. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." this is cnn breaking news. we're following breaking news. an exclusive new cnn poll on president trump just released. it shows that exactly one year after his stunning upset white house win, many americans are now voicing deep disappointment. 64% say they've lost confidence in the president. 63% say they don't think he deserves to be re-elected in
2020. those numbers helped fuel an election sweep that saw democrats capture governorships in virginia and new jersey. they also won seats in state houses across the country, possibly portending a struggle for republicans in next year's midterm election. and north korea is now demanding the united states oust president trump from office, calling him, quote, a lunatic old man. that follows the president's speech before the south korea assembly in which he took swipes at kim jong-un's grandfather who founded the country. the president said it's not the paradise he envisioned, but, rather, quote, a hell that no person deserves. we're covering all of that and much more this hour with our guests. including senator roy blunt of the senate intelligence committee. and our correspondents and specialists are also standing by. let's begin with the wave of democratic victories in elections across the country. brianna keilar is with us for the latest. brianna, republicans did
especially badly in virginia and one congressman there says the election was a referendum on president trump. >> that's right, wolf. there is some bipartisan consensus that it was. and beyond the governor's races, the democrats wmayoral races. you name it, democrats cleaned up across the country. >> reporter: tonight, one year after donald trump won the presidency, voters have delivered a sweeping and decisive victory for democrats in virginia and across the country. >> in 2005, i was head of the dscc. and you could smell a wave coming. the results last night smell exactly the same way. our republican friends better look out. >> reporter: the virginia governor's race was expected to be a nail-biter. instead, democrat ralph northam won overwhelmingly by almost 9 points. >> virginia has told us to end the divisiveness.
that we will not condone hatred and bigotry and to end the politics that have torn this country apart. >> reporter: northam defeating former rnc chairman ed gillespie, who embraced the trump agenda but not the president himself. trump wasted no time in blaming gillespie's strategy and not his own dismal approval ratings for the loss, tweeting, ed gillespie worked hard but did not embrace me or what i stand for. virginia republican congressman scott taylor had a different assessment. >> with all due respect to the president, i simply profoundly disagree with that. i think it's important that we come together as a country. think it's important that -- leadership matters. to me leading is bringing people together in achieving a purpose. >> reporter: new jersey pick democrat phil murphy to succeed republican governor chris christie. though many view the race as a referendum on an unpopular christie rather than the
president. >> we are a progressive blue beacon state that many other states used to look to for leadership on issues like women's health and the environment. we've gotten away from that. >> reporter: democrats at the state level enjoyed resounding success across the country. picking up at least 13 seats in the virginia state legislature. poised to flip control of the washington state senate. voters in maine cast ballots to expand medicaid for low-income adults, though the republican governor is refusing to enact the measure until it's fully funded. >> the democratic party is back, my friends! >> reporter: president barack obama, joe biden and hillary clinton tweeting their jubilation. obama writing, this is what happens when the people vote. senate minority leader chuck schumer arguing for republicans to abandon their efforts to overhaul the tax system. >> the republicans should look at the elections last night and it should be a giant stop sign for their tax bill. >> reporter: but how's speaker paul ryan insisting tuesday's
results provide extra motivation to deliver. >> it doesn't change my reading of the current moment, it just emphasizes my reading of the current moment, which is we have a props to keep. in anything, this puts more pressure on making sure we follow through. >> naturally, all eyes are turning to 2018. last night's outcomes, democrats taking back the house of representatives is a much more real possibility. they had a higher turnout than unusual in a non-presidential year. that is an indication they may be able to harness the power of the president's terrible approval ratings in the midterms next year, wolf. >> brianna keilar, thanks so much. president trump is facing some troubling numbers in an exclusive poll that has just been released. exactly one year after his election win, a lack of confidence in the president's leadership. jim acosta is traveling with the president. he's in china right now. jim, the president is using a very different tone there than he did out there on the campaign
trail. >> reporter: he really is, wolf. and the president has a crucial day of meetings coming up later today with china's president xi jinping. he is counting on president xi and his help to rein in north korea. the chinese long remember how the president bashed china in the past as a candidate. in beijing, they were painting the town red as president trump and china's president xi jinping took in the chinese opera and the in the capital's forbidden city. greeted by children saying we love you. but the love fest -- to push china to do more to contain north korea. >> it our responsibility and our duty to confront this danger together because the longer we wait, the greater the danger grows and the fewer the options become. >> reporter: before he landed in beijing, mr. trump called for china's help as he delivered a stern warning to north korea.
>> do not underestimate us. and do not try us. >> reporter: the president's speech to the south korean assembly, while heated, steered clear of his fire and fury taunts to kim jong-un earlier in the year. >> the weapons you are acquiring are not making you safer, they are putting your regime in grave danger. every step you take down this dark path increases the peril you face. >> reporter: for months, the president has wagered he can secure china's support by dialing back his own rhetoric aimed at chinese trade practices that he once described as devastating to his political base when he was a candidate. >> we can't continue to allow china to rape our country, and that's what they're doing. it's the greatest theft in the history of the world. >> reporter: the president is traveling across asia as a weakened leader back home. the gop was soundly defeated in
elections across the u.s., including in the virginia's governor's race where republican ed gillespie was trounced. >> i do think as well that there was a reluctance to have the president campaign in the state for him and i think there are a lot of things the president could have added as far as bringing out a lot of his supporters to help support ed. >> reporter: despite the bruising night, the president is taking a victory lap on the one-year anniversary of his surprising election win. ignoring his loss in the popular vote, the president tweeted, congratulations to all of the deplorables and the millions of people who gave us a massive electoral college land slide victory. but a new cnn poll shows nearly two-thirds of americans have lost confidence in the president since he took office. while nearly seven in ten believe other world leaders don't respect the president president -- a gop source who advises the white house told me that the republican party got owned on election night by the
democrats and they should look at those results as a warning for the upcoming midterms in 2018. wolf, we'll have to wait and see whether the president reflects on any of these political problems. back home he is scheduled to hold something of a joint statement with the chinese president xi jinping later on here in beijing. because we are in china, the chinese might be reluctant to take questions from reporters. wolf? >> we'll see what happens over there. jim acosta traveling with the president in chan. thanks very much. let's get more on all of this. joining us now republican roy blunt of missouri. he's a member of the intelligence committee. thanks for joining us. >> good to be with you, wolf. >> your candidate in virginia, ed gillespie, a man you know well, i man i know well, former chairman of the republican national committee, he lost by almost nine points. a lot of people agree it was a shellacking. a much bigger loss than anyone virginia observers anticipated. what happened? >> well, i do know ed gillespie well. think he would have been a great governor and certainly i wish
all of the governors of all the states well, including the new governor of virginia and the new governor in new jersey. i think there are a lot of republican governors and legislators that are still going to be doing their job. i don't really know. i'm no expert, especially in virginia politics. i do know the demographics of that state are changing pretty dramatically. it's sort of stable in population and the southern virginians who are leaving aren't moving to northern virginia, which is not what virginia used to be. so i wouldn't read too much into that. i am always -- i'm interested now, though, in why the polls are not any closer than they were. they weren't close a year ago today. everybody thought that race would be much closer than it was. i don't know that the polls measuring the president's performance are any more accurate than the polls predicting these election outcomes and they are way off. i can't quite figure that out. >> well, that's a fair question. there is a lot of study that is going on involving all of these
polls. but do you think -- and you know ed gillespie. he did well, relatively well, just barely lost to mark warner for the senate seat in virginia a few years ago. do you think he would have performed better if he ran closer to president trump. invited the president to come in and campaign for him? showed up at various stump speeches? the president was ready apparently to do it, but it didn't happen. >> well, like i said, i'm no expert in virginia and i'm certainly not an expert on giving people advice on how they should have won their campaign or how to run their campaign. i do think that ed gillespie had to spend a lot of time trying to solidify his own side, which is one of the challenges we had last time and one of the challenges we'll have next time, but so far that's continued to produce pretty good results in governorships and legislators and both houses in the congress. >> let's get to one of the major issues if not the major issue on your agenda, taxes. you've argue that republicans,
senator, should be less ambitious when it comes to tax reform and leave some of the reform for next year instead of doing it right now. now that you've seen last night's election results, democrats did very well, what do you think is the best way forward? >> well, i think we will at the end of the day leave some of these reforms for next year just because they get in the way of the real important need to have better tax policy this year to grow our economy next year. now, that doesn't mean we can't go to a territorial system. our lower corporates are going to build jobs and make better jobs. it also doesn't mean we can't look at tax cuts for working families, but some of these intricate things are going to have to be worked through. my view during this whole debate has been we shouldn't spend a lot of time on any argument we can't win. there is always a chance to look at that again, but there won't be a chance to rejuvenate this economy and give the first real pay raise, the take-home pay raise to working families
they've had in eight years. families are frustrated. you see that also on election day. you see a lot of frustration out there. people looking at different ways to express that frustration is voting against what appeared to just happen. the virginia race we were talking about, i think it's the 11th time in 12 cycles where the person whose party just won the presidential election loses the virginia governor's race, so there is something going on where people are looking for answers. i think we can give them some of those answers in a good tax bill. >> you're a, you know, a fiscal conservative, but the congressional budget office, as you know, they just released their report estimating that this revised republican tax reform bill would actually raise the deficit, the national debt by $1.7 trillion over ten years. senator, are you comfortable with that? >> well, first of all, the revised bill is not what the final bill will be, and secondly, most of these groups
that evaluate -- want to evaluate with a score that indicates a tax policy has no impact on economic decision-making, i'm sure that at the $1 trillion or $1.5 trillion over ten, that good tax policy just a little bit of growth in the annual growth of the economy quickly makes up for that. and every economist i'm talking to tells me that's what's going to happen if we'll stick to the main points in this bill. we're going to have not only more take-home pay now for working families, but we're clearly going to have better jobs as this bill would encourage capital to get off the sidelines and back into the economy. >> you're one of the leaders of the republicans in the senate. are you ready to commit right now, senator, that whatever tax bill emerges from the house, the senate -- joint house/senate conference committee, the final bill, you will give it enough time before a final vote that the congressional budget office could score it, as they say, and tell the american people how
large of a deficit it would create? you're clearly not going to be able to pay for all of the tax cuts you want the to implement. >> well, think the critical thing is to get a bill passed this year. i've watched the congressional budget office for a long time. they are never right. waiting to see later just how wrong they are never makes much sense to me. no, i wouldn't commit to that. you're going to have a score and there is going to be some argument about it. you're going to see some significant dynamic scoring. i was with larry lindsey today, one of president bush's economic advisers. i've never seen him more excited about the opportunity in a tax package than he was today. usually i see him as a guy who is on sort of the downside looking for the worst thing that can happen. he and every other economist thinks this is headed in the right direction. i have more faith in them than i could the cbo. >> how are you going to make sure it meets the senate rules? there are certain senate rules so that you can pass it with a
simple majority 50, 51, as opposed to 60. if the cbo doesn't score it, how are you going to meet that rule? >> there are other ways you can decide which of the many different evaluations out there you look at and decide this is the one we have the most confidence in. you don't want to put too much pressure on the budget chairman, but he has great leeway there. and also many of these things when you begin to unplug them or plug them back in, you're going to already know what the estimated economic impact of that was. so you're not dealing here with numbers that haven't been around for a long time, haven't been talked about. this is going to get the same number of votes in my opinion as we get to the final vote irregardless of whether you use cbo scoring or dynamic scoring. almost everyone knows what we're doing here will create better jobs for working families. >> all right. senator, there is more we need to discuss. you're a member of the senate
breathing technology senses your body to never be too hot or too cold, so you are guaranteed the best sleep ever. starting at only $99 including shipping and a lifetime guarantee. for your best friend - our new dog beds are just as dreamy and made with the same quality and advanced technology. this offer is for a limited time, so visit thecompanystore.com today. won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. switch and you could save $782 on home and auto insurance. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. and the wolf huffed like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe.
it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of death from asthma problems. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! (child giggles) symbicort. breathe better starting within 5 minutes. get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more.
we're back with republican senator roy blunt of missouri. he's a key member of the senate intelligence committee. senator, you agree with the u.s. intelligence community's assessment that russia was, in fact, behind the meddling, behind the 2016 hacking in the election interference, the presidential election interference. does it concern you as a result
of that that the cia director mike pompeo met with someone who is seen as a conspiracy theorist, a man who is peddling this theory that the dnc hack was really an inside job, that russia had nothing to do with it and that he met with this individual, pompeo, at the request of president trump? >> you know, i'm not concerned about that. my view on all of this has been we should talk to everybody that a reasonable person should talk to. we should look at everything that a reasonable person should look at. if there is somebody out there who has a dramatically contrary point of view, i don't have a problem with talking to them. i do think the russians were involved in our elections. other countries may have been also. russians have been involved in our elections for a long time. i'm interested in the new information coming out about how donna brazile, who was the chairman at the time, said that the russians did a lot more damage to their internal systems than i believe they've admitted up until now. i don't know why this is all
coming out a year later. you would think that the chairman of the party would be yelling about this even before election day if their files were messed up in some way. but, you know, another thing, wolf, in an open hearing we had the other day with facebook and twitter and google, i asked the facebook attorney who was there how much money did the russians spend on facebook? and it was $46,000 before the election. so my next question was, well, how much did the two campaigns -- not the republicans and democrats, but just clinton and trump spend? it was $81 million. i think we can pretty quickly get a lot of this out of proportion. it probably didn't turn the elections around, but we'd be naive to think that the russians don't want to do things that make our system look bad. they've got to love it that we're still talking about what they may or may not have done in our elections. >> some of that fake russian news was promoted on various
social media sites to maybe 150 million americans who read that stuff and absorbed it. but let me get back to the question -- >> i think absorbed there is the real question. >> well, they add least had access to it. >> they initially said 11.4 people might have seen it. they said, well, if everybody saw it who was on foob, that would be about 124 million. but, remember. it was a very small percentage of what the two other candidates were running. that was the best money anyone's ever spent if it possibly competed with the millions of dollars every is spending. we ought to get that guy to be our advertising person if it's $46,000 that we're still talking about. >> the president repeatedly says, he said it during the campaign, since becoming president, he says flatly there was absolutely no collusion with the russians. do you agree with the president or is that still an open question that your committee, house committees, the special
counsel are looking at? >> i think it's an open question until we nail it down, but here a year later there has not been any real evidence that there was collusion, certainly not that the president was involved in. i mean, they had a candidate who uniquely was identifying with the american people, but the campaign looks like to me not much of a campaign. i'm not sure that the trump campaign was capable of colluding with the republican national committee, let alone the russians, but they had a candidate who was connecting with people and that's all that campaign really was, it appears to me, but we have to look at everything. we're not done with this yet. the american people, the president, everybody involved deserves to know the answer to whether this is a yes or a no and we need to get to that answer as soon as we can. >> but you will acknowledge that there were a bunch of trump campaign official who's were talking to russians either here in the united states or actually went to moscow. that's the subject of the
continuing investigation, right? >> well, we ought to look at what they were talking about and who they were. some of these people don't appear to be all that stable to me. it's easy to say you're an adviser to the campaign, particularly a campaign like that that was so nontraditional. we need to look at that. i'm glad we're looking at it. i'm eager to look at anything anybody thinks a reasonable person should look at, read or anybody we should talk to and we're doing that. >> senator roy blunt, thanks so much no joining us. >> thank you. coming up, one year after president trump's historic election. cnn has a new exclusive poll on his performance in office. our political experts are standing by to discuss. plus, another round of personal attacks between president trump and kim jong-un. why is the north korean regime now calling for president trump's removal from office?
the breaking news. one year after president trump's stunning election victory, cnn has an exclusive new poll on his performance in office. we asked americans if they approve of the job the president is doing, whether he's keeps our promises. let's get right to our political ebbs betters for some analysis. this one question, gloria, do you think the president is doing a good job or a poor job? good job, only 40% think he's doing a good job. how much trouble is he in right now with his republican colleagues, his republican party? >> i think he's in a lot of
trouble. i think his base is okay, although a little less happy than they have been over the last six months. we see that decline in the polls among noneducated -- non-college-educated white voters. we see that decline. but members of congress are worried. if i were a suburban republican right now representing a suburban district and i saw the revenge of those suburbanites in virginia last night, i would be worried about keeping my seat. if i saw the president's tweet last night about ed gillespie, saying, well, he didn't hug me tight enough, he doesn't use me enough, and i were about to vote on a tax reform bill that might cause me some issues my district. if i were worrying about a president having my back, i would worry a little bit more after seeing that tweet last night. you know, this president ran as an insurgent and as an outsider
and he's never managed to kind of figure out what it is you have to do to deal with the establishment that he ran against if he wants to get anything done in washington. and as our poll shows, people don't think he's getting things done. he can blame all the people he wants, but in the end if and when he runs for re-election they're going to blame him and members of congress are wondering how long they need to stick with him. >> in that tweet, i'll read a sentence from hmm it, he said this, the president, ed gillespie worked hard but did not embrace me or what i stand for. there you see it right there. obviously the president doesn't believe he personally had anything to do with ed gillespie, rebecca, losing decisively in a lop-sided outcome. so what's the lessen the democrats should take from this? >> well, i think the lesson democrats should take, wolf, is exactly the opposite of trump as tweet, that trumpism is failing,
is toxic politically is is going to hurt republicans in the midterm elections in 2018. what gillespie was trying to do was harness as much trumpism as he could to energize those voters, energize trump's base at the same time he brought in more traditional republicans, suburban voters, and he obviously failed in that regard. this was -- republicans were hoping that this could be a model for them in 2018, and that model failed last night. so republicans are going to have to think long and hard about how they run with this unpopular president in office. perhaps tweeting against them all the while. and democrats, it's game-on for them. they're in a very good position. last night showed they're energized in a way maybe they weren't even in 2016. >> jeffrey, house speaker paul ryan says his republican colleagues have one important lesson to learn, they need to do what they're trying to do, get this tax bill passed, get it passed quickly, but there are a
whole bunch of republicans, especially the moderate republicans from new york or new jersey or california who are deeply worried that as it stands right now, they can't support this tax bill. >> the republican party is in a difficult place here because accomplishing nothing is obviously bad politics and i think that was part of the problem last night. however, accomplishing something that hurts you politically, especially with the more vulnerable members in the states you mentioned, that's also a problem. and i don't think they have resolved how to deal with that, but i do think by and large paul ryan is right that doing something is better than doing nothing. but that also has considerable political risks for them. >> the president told some democrats, some democratic senators in a phone conversations he was overseas back here, he said that his accountant had told him that if the current tax bill goes through, he would be personally a big loser. do you buy that? >> do you think he called his
accountant to find out? do you think his accountant called him? >> i don't know who called who. >> i'm trying to figure that out. if he's going to be a big loser, first of all, we should talk about the estate tax which, of course, would benefit him and his family. then maybe we ought to ask the question, okay, let's see your tax returns. because if we can see your tax returns then perhaps we could all see whether how this would benefit you and not benefit you if you get rid of the alternative minimum tax, for example. how will that benefit you or not benefit you? i think he raised the issue, so i think other people ought to be asking the question. >> we're probably not going to see his tax returns any time soon. >> wolf, think you're right about that. >> everybody stand by. there is more we need to assess. we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. and want more coverage, guess what? you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window. no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan,
insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything. and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. rates are competitive, and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long. and my brother ray and i started searching for answers. (vo) when it's time to navigate in-home care, follow that bright star. because brightstar care earns the same accreditation as the best hospitals.
and brightstar care means an rn will customize a plan that evolves with mom's changing needs. (woman) because dad made us promise we'd keep mom at home. (vo) call 844-4-brightstar for your free home care planning guide. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, by taking moneyg from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn't a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president,
then what has our government become? i'm tom steyer, and like you, i'm a citizen who knows it's up to us to do something. it's why i'm funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who's mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what's political and start doing what's right. our country depends on it.
[and her new business: i do, to jeanetgo. jeanette was excellent at marrying people. but had trouble getting paid. not a good time, jeanette. even worse. now i'm uncomfortable. but here's the good news, jeanette got quickbooks. send that invoice, jeanette. looks like they viewed it. and, ta-da! paid twice as fast. oh, she's an efficient officiant. way to grow, jeanette. new. get paid twice as fast for free. visit quickbooks-dot-com. fothere's a seriousy boomers virus out there that's been almost forgotten. it's hepatitis c. one in 30 boomers has hep c, yet most don't even know it. because it can hide in your body for years without symptoms, and it's not tested for in routine blood work.
the cdc recommends all baby boomers get tested. if you have hep c, it can be cured. for us it's time to get tested. ask your healthcare provider for the simple blood test. it's the only way to know for sure. welcome back. we're continuing our conversation with our panel. gloria, we're a year out from the president's election victory in 2016. look at the new cnn poll, just 30% say they think he'll unite the country. that's down 13 points from a year ago. does that factor into the results we saw last night with very impressive huge wins for women and minority candidates? >> yeah, look, i think this was an election in which people were motivated by donald trump and not in a good way, but in -- but in a negative way, and i think you see that in poll after poll that people believe he doesn't unite the country and what we saw last night, let's look at the state of virginia, you had a
very good african-american turnout. you had one in five voters were african-american. and i think that that is important as democrats look to 2018. i mean, barack obama went to the state of virginia and made the point of saying that, you know, democrats get kind of sleepy in off-year elections. they don't -- they don't generally turn out. i think you saw a variety of women being elected down ballot. you saw african-americans, one sikh, transgender, so i think it was a very, very different kind of electorate that turned out this time. you know, there is a dispute about whether this was the beginning of the resist anance,t it certainly was a reaction to the last year of donald trump and i think not only in virginia but also in new jersey and state
legislators. >> the peril at the moment is more to the republican party than it is to donald trump. lots of presidents do poorly in midterm elections. >> yep. >> and then go on to win. barack obama had a historically terrible re-election -- midterm in 2010 and then won fairly easy in 2012. >> same with bill clinton. >> same with bill clinton. so -- and, you know, we're not even up to the midterms yet. certainly all the signs are very bad for the republicans going into 2018, but i don't think anyone should necessarily draw the extrapolation that donald trump is destined to lose, even if the republicans do poorly a year from now. >> you know, he tweeted this, the president, aboard air force one. congratulations to all the deplorables and the millions of people who gave us a massive 304 to 227 electoral college landslide. with some of his staff while
traveling through china. clearly he's very pleased with what he's seeing. >> reliving some good memories, it's the anniversary of his victory. makes sense he would mention that victory, the historic nature. his brand has been dented, wolf. his whole brand is built around winning and success and there isn't a lot of that right now. he's endorsed multiple candidates now, ed gillespie, luther strange and failed to lift them to victory. donald trump has to be wondering now how powerful is his political brand? so he's trying to remind people that there was a time when it was powerful. >> i just also want to say that, you know, the diplomats can't get so doccocky here that they don't address that there are huge divisions within the democratic party. what you saw in virginia was a candidate who fit the state. he wasn't too far-left for the state of virginia. if democrats start having litmus
tests for every single candidate that they run, they're going to have problems, including their presidential candidate in 2020. and i think, you know, this is a great victory for them, but they have to be careful here not to overread this. >> actually i'm not sure about that. think being against donald trump may be enough. i think, you know, there is always this mythology you need an alternative platform. >> in 2018 it's enough. >> one election at a time, gloria. >> it may be enough in the midterms, but it isn't going to be enough in 2020. if you really want a swoeep, yo have to make sure your candidate matches your voters. >> that's a good point. >> you can't run cookie cutter candidates. >> you're going to be hearing a lot about donald trump from democratic candidates in the next -- >> all right. thanks guys very much. we'll be hearing a lot about the president in the upcoming elections. just ahead, north korea demands the united states remove president trump from office, calling him a lunatic old man.
>> reporter: many observers say tonight that the north kraens responded that way because pl trump made. kim jong-un has a personal message for -- trump goes after kim's grandfather. >> north korea is not the paradise your grandfather envisioned. it is a hell that no person deserves. >> reporter: tonight analysts are saying the president's jab at kim ill sun was --
>> i think it was a calibrated and careful dig because he knows that kim jong-un does model after his father. >> reporter: was it advisable for trump to get personal with kim? the white house isn't commenting tonight. but there's little doubt kim jong-un has sought to emulate his grandfather, from the clothes kim wears to his distinct hairstyle. >> kim jong-un wants to project the image of his grandfather. il-sung is viewed as a great revolutionary, he fought against the colonials, he fought against the united states in the korean war. >> reporter: il-sung was even as much more of a man of the people than kim jong-il, more reclusive, moody and a man who
presid presided -- who were watching trump's speech closely and who remember how well they lived under the grandfather. >> i think even the elites would take that to heart because i think elites secretly agreed that that is true, north korea is not what it used to be. north korea and south korea used to be on par with each other. but north korea is this terrible place that trump described. so i think kim jong-un will take this personally, he will be embarrassed by it. >> reporter: will it be new to get him to -- given what they know about kim jong-un, he's likely going to respond personally to president trump, his regime has already come out with a statement demanding that trump be thrown out of office
and calling him a lunatic old man. >> and he also took a jab at china, but now that he's in beijing, the president will have a tough time convincing the chinese leader to come down much harder on the kim jong-un. >> chinese leader xi jinping dislikes trump and maybe even detests him. but the chinese simply do not want north korea to implode so getting them to remove sanctions is going to be a difficult task. wave of democratic victories across the country, sparking growing concern among republicans. is it all foreshadowing next year's midterm election? we're . time's up, insufficient prenatal care. and administrative paperwork, your days of drowning people are numbered. same goes for you, budget overruns.
or a little internet machine? it makes you wonder: shouldn't we get our phones and internet from the same company? that's why xfinity mobile comes with your internet. you get up to 5 lines of talk and text at no extra cost. so all you pay for is data. see how much you can save. choose by the gig or unlimited. xfinity mobile. a new kind of network designed to save you money. call, visit, or go to xfinitymobile.com.
happening now, breaking news, lack of trust. new cnn polling exposes americans escalates doubts about the president's honesty and a growing opposition to giving him a second term. we'recrunching the numbers. trump lash, big election wins for democrats and making many republicans anxious about the midterms next year. more gop lawmakers run away from mr. trump. mission to china, the president lands in beijing in need of help to diffuse the north korean nuclear threat. how is he going to convince chinese leaders that he used to bash during the campaign. and lunatic old