Skip to main content

tv   CNN Tonight With Don Lemon  CNN  February 20, 2018 7:00pm-8:00pm PST

7:00 pm
tune in tomorrw night when the students of stoneman douglas speak out in a live cnn town hall. it's hosted by jake tapper tomorrow at 9:00 p.m. eastern. thanks for watching "360." time to hand it over to don lemon. "cnn tonight" starts right now. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. we're following multiple big stories tonight. we have breaking news on jared kushner. the president's son-in-law and a senior adviser reportedly fighting to keep his access to highly classified information against the wishes of the chief of staff, john kelly. that is according to "the new york times." we're going to have more on that breaking news story in just a moment. we also have major new developments on the florida school shooting rampage to tell you about and what happened in the state's capitol today is quite frankly a disgrace. it is a betrayal of 17 innocent students and teachers who were shot to death at stoneman douglas high school just six days ago. the florida house of representatives refusing to even
7:01 pm
consider a bill that would ban ar-15 rifles and other assault weapons. the motion failed 36-71. that means 71 state representatives who actually had a chance today to do something to protect the people of their state from the next mass shooting refused to even debate the measure. and that is a disgrace. the parents, siblings, classmates and community members of those 17 dead people are being told the status quo is just fine. we're going to give you the facts tonight about those legislators and what they did and why. and we're going to talk about the surviving students from stoneman douglas, who are arriving by busload tonight in tallahassee. but first, news on a story that president trump has tried again and again to sweep under the rug. at least 15 women who have accused donald trump of behavior ranging from sexual harassment and sexual assault to lewd
quote
7:02 pm
behavior around women. one of those women is rachel crooks. the president tried to silence her, tweeting today, "a woman i don't know and to the best of my knowledge never met is on the front page of the fake news "washington post" saying i kissed her for two minutes yet in the lobby of trump tower two years ago. never happened. who would do this in a public space with live security cameras running? another false accusation. why doesn't "the washington post" report the story of the women taking money to make up stories about me? one had her mortgage paid off. only fox news reported. doesn't fit the mainstream media narrative." not only is rachel crooks not backing down, she is running for the ohio state legislature as a democrat. she's here tonight to tell her story. joining me now in her first national television interview since she announced her run for state office is rachel crooks. rachel, thank you so much for joining us. we really appreciate it.
7:03 pm
>> thank you for having me, don. >> rachel, you were among the first of at least 15 women who came forward with accusations of president trump that he forcibly kissed you back in 2006, accusations which the president has repeatedly denied. first, tell us your story. what happened? >> sure. so, in 2006, as a young receptionist in trump tower, i saw mr. trump quite often outside the residential elevator bank outside of bay crock group, the company i worked for. and on one occasion when i introduced myself to him, he kiss m kissed me repeatedly on my cheeks and ultimately on my lips, which was totally shocking and inappropriate. >> your concern, rachel, was your story wasn't getting enough attention. and today you were on the front page of "the washington post." the president could not help himself. he tweeted this. i'll put that up. calling you a liar, in essence. what's your response to that?
7:04 pm
>> i'm not surprised that he called me a liar. i mean, that's not the first time. it is the first time, i guess, he's attacked my personally on twitter. but his whole approach to this has been to deny the allegations of myself and, like you said, almost 20 women who have come forward. so it's not surprising, but i would think, as our president, he would have more important things to do than to tweet at me and try to discredit my story. i know -- i know what's true. he knows what's true. and i think he should be fraafr of that. >> here's what you said. you're clearly not backing down and you tweeted today at the president. please, by all means, share the footage from the hallway outside the 24th residential elevator bank on the morning of january 11th, 2006. let's clear this up for everyone. it's liars like you and politics who have prompted me to run for office myself. i mean, how -- this is the man
7:05 pm
that you allege assaulted you. he's now the president of the united states. it's got to be tough to take on the president in that way. is it? >> i suppose, a little bit. but when the truth is on your side, it doesn't feel as bad. and i feel like i have a license to say what i feel about him, given what he did to me. >> well, he also said the same thing, you remember, with comey, when comey, you know, said -- talked about the loyalty pledge. he said, well, you know, i hope that, you know, comey had better hope that there aren't any tapes. do you think it's the same kind of situation. and then he never produced any tapes. and then he said he was going to sue all of the women who, you know, accused him after the election. he would sue them. none of that has happened. do you think this is just bluster? >> of course. yeah. i mean, and the same thing that james comey said. lordy, i hope there are tape. we all hope that that would be some kind of evidence to vindicate us. and i would welcome that as well. and of course he's not going to
7:06 pm
sue us. we -- he would have to disclose so much about his past and he knows how much inappropriate behavior is there so i don't fear for that. and again, i feel like with the truth on my side, i am willing to weather whatever storm comes my way. >> and, of course, you know, we all heard the president. this is in his own words, bragging about groping women in that infamous "access hollywood" clip. watch this. >> i got to use some tic tacs just in case i start kissing her. you know, i'm automatically attracted to beautiful -- i just start kissing them. just like a magnet. i just kiss. and when you're a star, they let you do it. you can do anything. >> whatever you want. >> grab 'em by the pussy. you can do anything. >> you know, the way you tell your story, rachel, about him repeatedly kissing you, it sounds just like what he said, doesn't it? >> mm-hmm. absolutely, yes. i mean, it was -- it was the
7:07 pm
weirdest experience, i think, you know, that i've encountered. someone who just saw me as so insignificant and of so little value where he could just accost me in that way. and it was -- definitely didn't sit well with me for many years. >> i want to move on and talk about you running for state legislature. but let me ask you, why do you think that so many women voted for this president, didn't believe this women? some of them say they don't believe your story. mo why do you think that is? what's going on here? >> that's a good question. i do have a hard time understanding the thought process there. i think there is strength in sisterhood and i'm not sure i do fully grasp why women would automatically side with a man, especially someone who had boasted about this behavior and has been caught lying in so many
7:08 pm
ways. but i think politics are strange these days and are very divis e divisive. i think people hold their political identity very close. and to some people, voting republican was more important than, you know, what this particular man had done. so i think it's a complicated issue. but, that's, i guess, the best that i've been able to grasp it in my own head. >> well, let's talk more about politics. because this month, you announced that you're running for a seat in the ohio state legislature. you say it's time for real change and honest leaders. talk to me about that, rachel. >> yeah. i mean, i've heard a good quote recently about sort of the financial stage in healing is to be able to use your experience to help others. and that's exactly what i want to do. you know, i've been given sort of this platform that i didn't expect or anticipate and i want to take on that responsibility and be a voice for people who feel neglected by politicians.
7:09 pm
i mean, ironically, trump, you know, won, because of that. you know, he was anti-establishment. and people gravitated towards that. but he's a con artist. he's not doing anything to help the people that he said he would. he's only trying to benefit himself and wealthy, you know, friends and family of his. so, i think people really do want honest, good leaders in politics who are going to work on behalf of them. that's that i want to do. >> so one of the biggest issues right now is gun legislation. and we see so many young students, so many of them young ladies who are involved in this, are very articulate, very active. and we've been talking about gun violence and gun control lately. you know, the legislature in florida voted today not to do what most students wanted when it comes to assault weapons, assault rifles. what do you believe needs to be done to crack down on gun violence? >> i think these students who
7:10 pm
have come forward amidst this tragedy are so inspiring and i think that's exactly what needs to happen, right? we need more people to continue to fight and talk about this. and i'm, you know, traveling on a bus to the florida legislature to demand this action. and still not being heard is sad. and i think we need to vote politicians into office who are going to actually take action. and obviously, looking at the donors who are giving to these politicians and seeing that a lot of these folks are just catering to their donors and not making policies that actually impact the people they serve. so that's what needs to change. >> rachel, thank you for coming on. again, your first interview since you announced that you're running for office. and thanks for talking about something that you have spoken about so much. but it's so important you keep telling your story, because you want things to change when it comes to women and you want things to change when it comes
7:11 pm
to legislation, gun legislation, and other issues. and that's why you're running and we appreciate you coming on. thank you so much. >> thank you for having me. and when we come back, busloads of students from stoneman douglas high school arriving in the state capital tonight after lawmakers refused to stand up for them and vote for a ban on assault weapons. i'm going to talk to some of those students. that's next. we do whatever it takes to fight cancer.
7:12 pm
these are the specialists we're proud to call our own. experts from all over the world, working closely together to deliver truly personalized cancer care. expert medicine works here. learn more at cancercenter.com
7:13 pm
it's a lot easier to make decisions when you know what comes next. if you move your old 401(k) to a fidelity ira, we make sure you're in the loop at every step
7:14 pm
from the moment you decide to move your money to the instant your new retirement account is funded. ♪ oh and at fidelity, you'll see how all your investments are working together. because when you know where you stand, things are just clearer. ♪ just remember what i said about a little bit o' soul ♪ things are just clearer. peopbut they're different.nd. nice tells you what you want to hear. but kind is honest. this bar's made with delicious cranberries and almonds. so, guess what? we call it cranberry almond. find your favorite and give kind® a try. oh! there's one.a "the sea cow"" manatees in novelty ts? surprising. what's "come at me bro?" it's something you say to a friend. what's not surprising? how much money matt saved by switching to geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more.
7:15 pm
students from stoneman douglas high school arriving by the busload tonight at the state capital to demand that their representatives do something to protect them from gun violence, like the rampage that killed 17 of their classmates and teachers less than a week ago. and what did those representatives do? nothing. members of the florida statehouse refused to even consider a ban on assault weapons today, voting down a motion to bring the bill to the floor. 36-71. an insult to the memories of the people who lost their lives and to the surviving students as well. we told you that 71 members of the florida statehouse, all of them republicans, refused to vote for an assault weapons ban today, just six days after 17 students and their teachers lost their lives at stoneman douglas high school. that is disgraceful and that is a fact. here's more of what we have learned today about today's
7:16 pm
vote. florida does not require that pacs like the nra, political victory fund, disclose who they are spending in support of or against. so what's alarming here, there's no way to follow the money and find out how many nra dollars went to any of these lawmakers. but here's what we do know. all but a handful of those who refused to vote for the assault weapons ban today have an "a" or an "a" plus rating from the nra. two have no rating and one has a "d." but every other one that has the nra's full seal of approval. thiz a these are the lawmakers who today refused to do something to stand up for the innocent victims of gun violence. let's bring in now ryan daesh, a student at stoneman douglas.
7:17 pm
we appreciate you joining us so much. >> thank you so much. >> what do you think of how the florida house voted today? >> i've heard about the statehouse vote from other people around me and it's just -- it's definitely a disappointment. but it is nowhere near the last step in this battle. it is just one little stepping stone that we have to overcome, we have to just get passed that little hurdle and make it through. we have to show them that we are not just some online presence, we are real people fighting a real fight. >> what do you want to say to those representatives tonight? you have a lot of americans listening to you and you have the microphone. >> well, i want to say that i've always found the florida legislation to be a bit odd. i mean, in my own home county of broward, it is unlawful to sing in a bathing suit in public. i just find that i cannot trust any of their word, if they say that they're going to vote down something in committee, that's just ridiculous to see that it would not even make the floor. they would not even discuss it
7:18 pm
further. they want to throw it away, they want to sweep it under the rug. we're here saying that you can't sweep anything under the rug anymore. we're here to fight you and we're here to show you that we are here for the people and we are here to make sure that innocent lives are no longer lost. >> so there was one setback today, but what will you do tomorrow? >> well, tomorrow we are going to the state capitol building to speak to those very state senators and state congressman that have spoken tout again-- o what we are trying to push, trying to stop us, but we will continue to speak to them and meet face-to-face in small groups with various state senators and say, congressman, just to speak our minds and hopefully come to some sort of an agreement. >> there are people saying now, a lot of people in consensus here, that this time is different because of you and your classmates. why do you think this time is different? do you think it's different? >> i will tell you that i find it odd that it has to be different. i find it odd that people have
7:19 pm
to constantly say, why are you different from columbine or las vegas or the orlando shooting? and we should not have to be different. this should not continually come up. there should not be statistics that keep changing every single month because another crazed maniac goes out there and shoots up a bunch of people. they should be stopped. we should make sure that these people get help if they are mentally ill. if they are unstable. i hope that mental health will be able to handle these people. i want people just to be able to live, people to feel safe, be able to go out to their school and not have to worry what they're wearing, if it will attract a shooter p. i mean, i have red hair. i will be found in fields miles away, especially in florida where it's flat and you can see as far as the eye. >> yeah. listen, i want to ask you. we've heard, it seems to be a political talking point coming from many on the right that you students have somehow been co-opted by the progressive left
7:20 pm
and activists and the media. how do you respond to that? >> i respond to all of that by saying, it is a great help to see people out there with influence and money being able to donate with us, being able to speak about our movement. but by all means, this is a movement of the students for students, to be able to feel safe in a school, to be able to feel safe outside their home and inside their home. so they wouldn't have to fear some gunman coming in and by all means, the -- you can say this is a left issue, you can say this is a right issue, it is not. this is a human issue. this is a human topic. this is life we are talking about. >> there's a lot of activity happening behind you, ryan. what's going on? >> behind me, i have not looked, i have not turned my head as i was afraid to get out of the cameraman's shot. right now, we are just cleaning up from all the buses coming in. i was on the second bus.
7:21 pm
everyone piled into the school. they are talking to people now. but i made sure to stay out here to talk to the people who chose to come out here from leon high school, chose to speak to us, and i was just moved by all of them standing out here supporting me and my fellow classmates in our battle. >> the governor, rick scott, is promising quick action to prevent violence in school and keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. by friday, he says he'll have a proposal. do you believe him, ryan? >> it's hard to say if i believe anyone at this point. i know that governor scott has not been my favorite in the bunch. i have compared him to lord voldemort just by his appearance. but overall, i believe that anything he says means nothing until i see that bill, until i see that law passed. words are just words. >> ryan deitsch, thank you so much, appreciate your time. >> thank you so much. we're counting down to an important event tomorrow night. the students of stoneman douglas high school speaking out to
7:22 pm
demand action and an end to gun violence once and for all. "stand up: a live cnn town hall" hosted by our very own jake tapper. congressman ted deutch will be taking questions from students and parents. that's "stand up: a live cnn town hall" tomorrow night, 9:00 eastern, of course right here on cnn. and when we come back, more problems with jared kushner's security clearance. and that's creating a rift between him and the chief of staff, john kelly.
7:23 pm
7:24 pm
7:25 pm
7:26 pm
so the breaking news tonight is about jared kushner, the president's son-in-law and senior adviser reportedly fighting to keep his access to highly classified information against the wishes of the chief of staff, john kelly. that is according to "the new york times." so joining me now on the phone is julie hirschfield davis who helped break the story for "the new york times." julie, thank you very much for joining us here. this is a big story. you're reporting tonight that jared kushner is resisting giving up his access to highly classified information, prompting an internet struggle with the chief of staff. what can you tell us? >> well, when the chief of staff put out this memo on friday, it wasn't clear to anyone and
7:27 pm
certainly not clear to jared kushner how it was going to affect him and his ability to see the information he thinks he needs to see to do his job. now, jared kushner has been operating as rob porter had on an interim clearance, because he has not fully cleared his background investigation that began last year. but it's clear from the memo that john kelly issued last week that the people who are in that position are not going to be able to continue that way going forward, because they're cracking down -- he's cracking down on this practice of allowing people to have high-level security clearances, top-secret and access to sensitive, compartmented information, which is the much more high-level clearance that fewer people have, on an interim basis. basically, the new policy is if you haven't passed your permanent background check, you can't have that kind of clearance anymore going forward. this has raised a lot of questions from kushner about, well, where does that leave him?
7:28 pm
and there's a lot of concern that he's going to have to relinquish the access that he's enjoyed for, you know, more than a year. >> which is interesting, because if it's, you know, if it goes as the memo has stated, then jared kushner would be one of the people who should not have access to this information and who kelly says wouldn't, according to the memo. but kelly is pushing back. as a matter of fact, julie, he put out a statement. as i told jared days ago, with i have full confidence in his ability to continue performing his duties in his foreign policy portfolio including overseeing our israeli/palestinian peace effort and serving as an integral part of our relationship with mexico. everyone in the white house is grateful for these valuable contributions to furthering the president's agenda. there is no truth to any suggestion otherwise. but again, according to the memo and the policy, it's quite different than what he said in that statement. what's your read on this? >> well, it was interesting that he opted to put out that statement at all. essentially, what he is saying
7:29 pm
is that jared kushner does not need this level of access to do the job that he has. well, if you ask senior advisers to presidents in the white house, they will say something quite different, which is that in these positions, you actually do need access to top-secret information -- >> especially if you're doing israeli/palestinian negotiations. you're going to have to see classified information. >> you're going to have to be read into things that are considered sensitive, compartmented information, from time to time. you may have to look at the presidential daily brief from time to time. these are all things that jared kushner has been able to do on an interim basis for many months. and what you hear john kelly doing through this statement is saying, don't worry, it's fine, you'll still be able to do the job that you have without this. but it's not clear to jared kushner how that's going to be possible. and frankly, it hasn't really been laid out. and in the statement today, kelly was very clear. he wasn't going to address specifically jared kushner's clearance or any other individual's clearance. and he's not ready to address
7:30 pm
these issues directly about where this leaves kushner. and frankly, there are other officials in the west wing who are similarly situated. we may not know their names, but this has been a problem that john kelly has been trying to get his hands around for many months. and he's only now getting around to putting out some policies to try to enforce it. >> julie, great reporting. thanks for being here. i want to bring in sandra murray and april ryan. thank you both for joining us. i have to ask you about this reporting, april. you're at the white house. that's your beat most days. what's your read on this? >> well, the read is that jared kushner, he has his hands in a lot of pots, particularly when it comes to issues of intelligence and security, like you said a moment ago. you cannot deal with issues of the middle east without seeing the daily intelligence brief and
7:31 pm
understanding the minutia, gettiget gettiget getting into the weeds about what's happening there on the ground, which is very sensitive. and also the issue with mexico. you know, this is going to be very hard for someone like jared kushner at that level to be able to -- if they were to take away the aspect of top-secret and other materials that -- really sensitive materials that his clearance would not allow him to have. because you have to remember, an interim clearance is about keeping it limited in scope. you cannot look at top secret or classified information. so jared kushner will have a tough time if that were the case. but the question is, you know, my sources are telling me that the president could actually waive this for jared kushner if, indeed, he chose to. though this is his son-in-law. he's stood by him thus far. we have to see how this plays out, if the president will step in and allow him to -- >> can i ask you something, april? what is the relationship between kelly and kushner?
7:32 pm
is it contentious? is there any way -- do the reporters who are out in the briefing room or who are set up there every day and have work spaces, is there -- what's their read on the relationship between the two men? >> well, according to sources, it's not pretty -- it's not a pretty situation right now. you know, i'm hearing that jared kushner and ivanka have been looking at helping the president possibly find replacements for john kelly, even before this moment. so this doesn't bode well. if you have the keys to the kingdom and you don't necessarily have to have all that you need to have those keys, of course you're going to push back. and this just makes perfect sense. this is common sense. but this will not help the relationship at all go smoothly. i mean, there's already tension. it's going to be worse. >> sarah, i'm going to bring you in now and i want to talk about russia. the president tweeted this out earlier today, sarah. he said, i have been much
7:33 pm
tougher on russia than obama. just look at the facts. total fake news. you know, that was also echoed during the white house briefing. watch this. >> he has been tougher on russia in the first year than obama was in eight years combined. he's imposed sanctions, he's taken away properties, he's rebuilt their military. he has done al number of things to put pressure on russia and to be tough on russia. just last week, there was an incident that will be reported in the coming days in another way that this president was tough on russia. >> but sarah, the facts don't bare that out. >> yeah, let's look at the facts. let's look at what obama did versus what president trump has done so far. obama personally warned vladimir putin against interfering in our u.s. elections. he imposed sanctions on russian individuals as well as entities. he expelled 35 russian diplomats and closed two russian compounds that were in the u.s.. and i think part of the reason that the trump administration is grappling with this is we have not seen a strong approach from the president himself. we have not seen him come out
7:34 pm
and condemn russia's interference in our election. we have not seen him come out and say, i'm going to do everything in my power to ensure this never happens again. and we also haven't seen the president follow through on imposing russian sanctions that have been overwhelmingly aproved by congress. so sarah sanders can go out and say what she feels she needs to say from the podium in that briefing room, but i think a lot of people are looking at this saying, why would we believe this if it doesn't come from the president directly? and his actions have really not backed up her words at the podium today. >> and this this president always needs a foil, so it's either hillary clinton or barack obama or the media. that's why he keeps going back to the obama well. i have to ask you, sarah sanders also made this false claim about the president's response to russia. take a look. >> the president hasn't said that russia didn't meddle. what he's saying is it didn't have an impact and it certainly wasn't with help from the trump campaign. >> the facts don't bear that out either, do they? >> look, don, i think if the
7:35 pm
president came out and said, russia, we knee what you did, we are going to snoor you never meddle in our elections again, take a tough line on that and then went on to spike the football and say, but by the way, this didn't impact me becoming president, people nine with that. but here's a look at some of the things president trump has said when it comes to russian meddling. >> i don't think anybody knows it was russia that broke into the dnc. how many times do i have to a answer this question? russia is a ruse! this russia thing with trump and russia is a made-up story. the entire thing has been a whip hundredth. the russia story is a total fabrication. russia did not help me, okay? i call it the russian hoax. they made up the whole russia hoax. it's a democrat hoax. it's a democrat hoax. >> if you talk to some people in the white house, they will say he is referring to two different things here. the thing that the president thinks is a hoax is the notion
7:36 pm
of collusion with trump campaign officials, not the notion that russia meddled in the election. but this is a president that has not gone to the lengths to make that distinction or to publicly condemn russia for their behavior. so yet again, we're relying on white house officials to sort of parse and explain what the president may think on this. we're not relying on leadership from president trump on this issue. >> it's interesting that they would do this, april, because, you know, sarah laid out the facts here and played some sound bites. but there was a fact check that was done. june of 2016, the president saud, then candidate donald trump, it was a dnc that did the hacking, right? talking about interference in the election. he's not saying that russia did it. september 2016, "i don't think anybody knows it was russia that broke into the dnc." this contradicts what he's saying. october 2016, maybe there is no hacking. december of 2016, i don't believe they interfered. that became a laughing point,
7:37 pm
not a talking point, a laughing point. and january of 2017, russia, outside groups, beam are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions. and then in mah, if russia did have anything to do with our election, i want to know an it. and july, somebody did say, if you did do it, you wouldn't have found out about it. november, every time he sees me, he says, i didn't do that. he's talking about putin. that's interference in the election. so what is sarah sanders talking about? and what is the president talking about, saying that he never said that russia didn't interfere with the election? that's a -- those are flat-out lies. he's saying it right there in all the examples i gave. >> you gave a lot of examples. and the last one that you gave is poignant. when this president talked about to vladimir putin and said he believed him. and i'm thinking back to when then president barack obama was president and he told vladimir
7:38 pm
putin to quit it, to cut it out, to stop it. so, you have to remember, this president's back is up against the wall. it's getting closer. and when you have indictments coming the way they're coming, when sarah huckabee sanders said just a few months ago, oh, this investigation is coming to a close soon, it's just beginning. and we're seeing it on the outskirts. and many, you know, who are close to this administration have said it's getting so close that there is fear that it could touch the inner circle. and it's getting close. when you start talking about plea deals, you're talking about going higher. and what's higher than the ones that have already been indicted? what's higher? who's higher? and people flipping. so this president is very concerned about this. and that's one of the reasons why he's very concerned and thinking about firing mueller. we have to really look at this for what it is. and sarah huckabee sanders came out saying this, because at this
7:39 pm
moment, this is totally against what they were saying at the beginning. the smoke is there, now they're trying to find the fire. >> thank you both, i appreciate it. when we come back, a european lawyer pleads guilty to lying to robert mueller's investigators after he covered up his conversations with former trump campaign aide, rick gates. i'm going to talk about that with a member of the house intel committee, that's next. i'm your phone, stuck down here between your seat and your console, playing a little hide-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, you could be picking up these charges yourself. so get allstate, where agents help keep you protected from mayhem... ...like me. mayhem is everywhere. are you in good hands? why people everywhere are upgrading their water filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids. pour it through brita's two-stage filter. dissolved solids remain?
7:40 pm
what if we filter it over and over? (sighing) oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so, maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.
7:41 pm
7:42 pm
at the marine mammal center, the environment is everything. we want to do our very best for geeach and every animal,er. and we want to operate a sustainable facility. and pg&e has been a partner helping us to achieve that. we've helped the marine mammal center go solar, install electric vehicle charging stations, and become more energy efficient. pg&e has allowed us to be the most sustainable organization we can be. any time you help a customer, it's a really good feeling. it's especially so when it's a customer that's doing such good and important work for the environment. together, we're building a better california.
7:43 pm
you can score another victory for the special counsel, robert mueller, in the ongoing russia probe. a dutch lawyer pleading guilty for lying to mueller's investigators about his discussions with former trump campaign official rick gates. and i want to talk about that and other aspects of the investigation with congressman mike quigley, an illinois democrat, who is a member of the intelligence committee. listen, i want to discuss that, but quickly, were you listening to the conversation before about the president insisting that he has never denied, you know, that russia influenced the election, and then i gave examples of ways that he did deny it. do you think he's doing enough to protect our electoral process? >> you missed my favorite quote when he said, it could have been a guy in jersey, a big guy in jersey. look, it's more than the president just protecting
7:44 pm
himself that we should be worried about. a year ago, it should have been a call to arms. we knew in august of '16 that my state's board of election was hacked by the russians. since then, we know that it's several dozen. and as as director comey said, they're coming back. we have 13 states that don't even have a paper record to know that we've been hacked. our equipment is 10 to 12 years old. it cannot meet the demands of modern cybersecurity. we are extraordinarily vulnerable. we need to buy new equipment to attack from future attacks. the president's intransigence and obstruction has not only protected himself, it's actually made us more vulnerable to the next wave of attacks my the russians. >> another question before i get to today's guilty plea. i have to ask you about the democratic memo for house intel. what is the status? when might we see it? >> yeah, it's sad that the
7:45 pm
majority's memo went through with almost no analysis by the intel community, and clearly not from the white house. and our memo, which rebuts their memo, point by point, and actually enhances the integrity of the investigation, was not released by the white house. it's my understanding that we're still in discussions with the intel community to redact portions they're particularly concerned about. i would go along with that process. i just want a fair shake from the white house. >> yeah. do you -- well, quickly, do you think that there'll be a redacted version? what are your expectations? >> i would like to think that there would be a redacted version soon and that we can move forward on the ongoing investigation. we have now wasted four weeks of critical time. >> so let's turn now to that guilty plea of the attorney, alex van der zwaan, robert mueller's fourth since the special counsel probe began. what's your reaction to it? >> yeah, it reminds me, and i think reinforces what the
7:46 pm
american public needs to know. mr. mueller is the right man for this job. the most important investigation of our lifetime. and he is not taking any nonsense. if you lie, you're going to be indicted and you're going to go to jail. mr. papadopoulos learned that, as well. so i think it's a clear message to those who are obstructing this investigation or who would lie to us, as congress, or to the mueller investigation, that we're not going to allow it. we need to know exactly how the democratic process was attacked, and how to prevent it in the future, and who helped them do it. >> you are a part of the house intel committee's investigation. was van der zwaan on your radar before this was announced? >> well, we try to avoid talking about who was or wasn't on our radar. i would just say that there's a whole slew of folks that the american public haven't heard about yet. that certainly happened and we learned eed about the first fou indictments. that's because the investigation
7:47 pm
has been obstructed. it has been teamworked by the white house and unfortunately the chairman of the intel community, mr. nunes, i think now working in full concert to obstruct the investigation. so the reason you haven't heard all of these names like the one you just heard about in the guilty plea today is because we've been hindered by both the wlo white house and the house investigation intel committee. >> okay. thank you very much, mike quigley, i appreciate that. >> glad to be here. when we come back, the president tweeting tonight in support of strengthening background checks, after earlier today instructing the justice adopt propose a rule to ban bump stocks. but will any of this actually come to fruition? introducing dell cinema. technology with incredible color, sound and streaming. just as the creators intended.
7:48 pm
♪ up to 40% off at dell.com ♪
7:49 pm
i needthat's whenvice foi remembered that my ex-ex- ex-boyfriend actually went to law school, so i called him. he didn't call me back! if your ex-ex- ex-boyfriend isn't a lawyer, call legalzoom and we'll connect you with an attorney. legalzoom. where life meets legal. woman: where are we taking him? i have no clue. we're just tv doctors. if this was a real emergency, i'd be freaking out. we are the tv doctors of america.
7:50 pm
together with cigna reminding you to go, know, and take control of your health. schedule your annual check-up today.
7:51 pm
breaking news in the aftermath of the florida high school massacre. president trump tweeting whether we are democrat or republican we must focus on strengthen background checks. i want to bring in anna nofr o and scott sanders. and good to have you on. president trump, simeon announced that he wants the justice department to declare bump stocks, that effectively turn semiautomatics into the machine guns ppt he wants to declare those illegal.
7:52 pm
is that a step in the right direction? >> yes. it's a step in the right direction. in the aftermath of the las vegas massacre. we heard a conversation from members of congress and outside folks around banning the bump stocks, saying bump stocks are sag that modify a gun making it deadlier. but that didn't go anywhere. i'm wonder wlag kind of muscle is the white house willing to put behind this effort? do they have the ability to twist arms? but, don, donald trump in the budget he proposed he cut critical funding for background checks specifically when it comes to being able to put this information to this comprehensive system. when someone does run a name or whatnot, the correct information pops up. and the folks aren't able to get a of an intoxicant if they shouldn't. he cut that funding. i have to wonder with the announcement of the bump stock policy if you will, how true is the administration? how married to the idea are they? are they willing to put the
7:53 pm
muscle behind it. >> and also. >> on issues of gun control -- >> rolling back some of the rules about who was able oh get a gun. under the obama administration it was harder for people with mental issues to get a gun. this administration put an end to that. anna, the white house also announcing they are hosting two days of meetings with students, parents and teachers and public officials aimed at improving school safety. what are your expectations for this event. >> you know be i think a lot of america i have very low expectations for anything after gun tragedies, because i think so many of us have just become frustrated and accustomed to seeing nothing happen. a lot of thoughts, prayers, mourning, a lot of outrage, a lot of this and that. and you know finger pointing but leading to nothing. it would be a refreshing surprise. it would be a wonderful surprise. it would be a great celebration for any of us if we saw this tragedy turned into action, turn
7:54 pm
into specific results. what do i expect? what i hope is that it's not a carefully curated group of people that agree with this administration or that agree with, you know, the current gun laws. but also you know that they hear from folks like ema gonzalez from the parkland tragedy, they hear from the students who survived this and who have lent voices and become the activists behind the movement. let me say something. we have to stop criticizing and aching the students. what is going on by some of the gun lobbyists, trump apologyists and page hills on the air attacking and questioning motives the kids is gross, unconscionable. let's be clear. they don't need to be coached by anybody. they witnessed their -- 17 calamities, friends, faculty,
7:55 pm
teachers die. they are burying in the days gone by. it's unacceptable for adults to pick a political fights with these folks. "i" glad a staffer got fired process. more people doing it should be outed. it's did you say gusting. >> according to politico the white house source said some administration officials were taken aback by the president's bump stock announcement after days of talking around we're focusing on mental health. that was the talking point. do you think the president is signaling a change in his position? maybe he is signaling to the base, you know, i'm going to give on this one? what do you think? >> yeah, i think the bump stock thing is a good idea. in fact i can't think of somebody i know i would consider a strong second amendment advocate that doesn't think the bump stock ban is a good idea. it seems to be a no brainer solution. i know a lot of conservatives that think we could do more to strengthen the background check
7:56 pm
situation. i think there are policy ideas here that may not be as hard to implement as we think. i know people have a low expectation of what congress and the executive branch might do following a shooting like this. but there are ideas right now in rotation in the policy rotation, that i think a, have popular support and clearly caught the attention of the president. those are important thing in trying to pass a bill. i think the white house is serious. and as they ought to be. this is a terrible tragedy. there are policy solutions, databased policy solutions that don't impede on rights but might get to the heart of the issue which is stopping the mass shootings from occurring. >> listen, today, the florida house of representatives voted down a explosion banning purchases of assault rifles and large capacity magazines statewood. it's your state anna, it's fair to get your reaction. >> it's my state and it's people that i know. who voted today on that.
7:57 pm
look. the groundwork hadn't been laid for that. did i expect that to be passed all of a sudden? no. there are also things that happened today in florida, for example, the governor convened and held a round table with, you know, people from law enforcement and education on the issue of mass shootings. but it's not enough to have a round table. it's not enough to have a discussion. he has to make sure that it gets addressed by the legislature. the legislature is in session now. in florida the legislature only convenes two months a year. they've got two and a half more weeks of legislative session. if they don't do it then the governor should call a special session to address this. two of the recent shootings, happened in his state. you have bill galvona, the senate president, the he is proposing common sense solutions for in, like for example increasing the age at which you
7:58 pm
can buy an ar-15, increasing the waiting period to three days. it can't be easier to buy an ar-15 than it is to rent a car. right now it is. >> yes. thank you all. we're out of time. i appreciate it. we'll be right back. ♪ (nadia white) the moment a fish is pulled out from the water, it's a race against time. and keeping it in the right conditions is the best way to get that fish to your plate safely. (dane chauvel) sometimes the product arrives, and the cold chain has been interrupted, and we need to be able to identify where in the cold chain that occurred. (tom villa) we took our world class network, and we developed devices to track environmental conditions. this device allows people to understand what's happening with the location, but also if it's too hot, if it's too cold, if it's been dropped... it's completely unique. (dennis woloshuck) if you have a sensor that can keep track of your product,
7:59 pm
it keeps everybody kind of honest that way. who knew a tiny sensor could help keep the food chain safe? ♪
8:00 pm
to keep our community safe. before you do any project big or small, pg&e will come out and mark your gas and electric lines so you don't hit them when you dig. call 811 before you dig, and make sure that you and your neighbors are safe. this is cnn tonight.i'

137 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on