Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  April 4, 2018 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT

10:00 pm
with advil liqui-gels, what bad shoulder? what headache? advil is relief that's fast strength that lasts you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels
10:01 pm
well, the question this hour, did russian money flow into the 2016 trump campaign? cnn has learned special counsel robert mueller wants to find out and has been making aggressive moves to find out. explain what you've learned about what mueller has been doing. >> well, anderson, what we've learned so far is that mueller's team is now targeting certain russian oligarchs and they've actually stopped two of them when they've landed in the u.s. on their private planes recently, in the past month. and for one of those oligarchs, mueller's team had asked them for questions and also had searched one of their electronic devices. the other oligarch was also stopped, and we've also learned that one other oligarch, who is in russia, was asked to provide voluntarily documents and give
10:02 pm
an interview to special counsel mueller's team. we're not sure if he's going to do that, but we do know now that as part of this investigation into whether russia meddled in the election and if there was any collusion with the trump campaign, mueller's team is now tracing the money that came into the campaign through some of these oligarchs and asking these questions. >> so it's illegal for foreign nationals to donate money to u.s. political campaigns. how would they have potentially gotten around that? >> so we understand that mueller's team is asking questions around two different ways that money could be hidden or funneled through intermediaries into the campaign. one of them, sources tell us, is that mueller's team is looking at whether there were straw donors or american citizen who's can properly contribute to campaigns, but to see if any russian money came in through them. another avenue that mueller's team is pursue, sources tell us, is looking to see if russians made investments into corporations or donated to think tanks. and those corporations and think
10:03 pm
tanks then donated through a political action committee into the campaign or inauguration fund. both ways would enable there to be layers between the source of the money and the donations, and we understand that mueller's team is now asking questions about that. >> and mueller's approach with russian oligarchs recently, explain what it tells us about -- or what we can discern about the investigation itself from that. >> one source said this could be the, quote, wish also. mueller's team has probably already gone through various documents, bank records, account statements that they have jurisdiction over in the u.s. and now stopping the russians is a chance to see what more they can learn from the other end of the money flows, if it did in fact go to these individuals. experts i've talked to have said this is a real strategy that prosecutors use. you know, they want to catch people off guard. they want the element of surprise, and they want to try to get the truthful off the cuff answers, not something that's been more rehearsed or lawyered. it also gives them an
10:04 pm
opportunity to search electronic devices such as cell phones before they can be wiped of any potential evidence. >> kara scannell, appreciate the reporting. few people are better equipped to talk about this than cnn's senior legal analyst preet bharara, former u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. preet, the idea that mueller's team is having the fbi search russian oligarchs traveling into the united states. what does that tell new. >> it tells me the mueller team is very serious, it has something that is causing them to take these significant and aggressive steps. it's telling me and should tell everyone the investigation shouldn't stop at water's edge. they can't go into russia and interview people they would like, who may have been involved in affecting the election in an unlawful way, but they can lie in wait. it's something prosecutors have been doing for a long time. oligarchs should now appreciate that they travel a little bit at their own peril.
10:05 pm
>> would they also have the capabilities of reaching out to oligarchs traveling in great britain? a lot of russians go there. >> you would be hoping that our allies and our law enforcement partners around the world, particularly in friendly countries, are coordinating with our own law enforcement and assisting us in various ways in allowing us access to people who they, themselves, might be requested to conduct interviews that are significant to an investigation going on here. i don't know what kind of arrangements have been reached, but that's a normal thing that happens, and it happened during the time i was u.s. attorney as well. >> which part of mueller's case do you think this could fit into? could he be trying to establish some sort of quid pro quo here? >> it looks like it. i think people understand there are two major components, it looks like, the mueller team is focusing on. one is obstruction, obstruction-related issues. and the other is whether or not people conspired in some way against the laws of the united states to affect the election. so this looks like the oligarch interviewing looks like it's talking about the second component because if it turns out that oligarchs or anyone
10:06 pm
else, whatever you want to describe them as, had contributed to campaigns unlawfully, and that would be unlawful by definition, then mueller's going to be looking at it. >> in today's press briefing, sarah sanders was asked about whether the president would sit for an interview with mueller's team. i just want to show our viewers what she said. >> okay. >> the president is working in conjunction with his legal team and making a determination. i'd refer you to them on anything specific regarding that matter. we're continuing to be fully cooperative with the office of the special counsel, and we'll continue driving the same message that we've been driving for over a year, that there was no collusion. >> obviously the president a couple months ago or maybe a couple weeks ago said that he would be willing to testify under oath. i mean as an attorney, do you think he should sit for an interview because yesterday, you know, we learned that according to the reporting, mueller views him as a subject, not as a target. but that can also change. >> look, being a subject of an investigation is a very serious thing. it means that you are under
10:07 pm
investigation. it means at any moment you can convert yourself into a target of the investigation. by the way, some occasions we've seen in the past and it includes martha stewart and some other less infamous cases as well, that the thing that got someone in trouble was having been a subject coming in and lying to the government, lying to fbi agents, caused them to be charged. as we've seen in the mueller investigation so far, including with respect to the person who just got sentenced this week to 30 days in prison, it is a serious matter to lie to the fbi, that bob mueller will charge people who engage in that conduct, in lying to the agents. so it's a big deal. if you're asking me, you know, as a lawyer generally speaking, do i want the president to sit down for an interview? i would say yes, and i think that most of the public would want that because he can clear things up. he can explain both to the investigators and for purposes of showing that he has nothing to hide. it's a good thing politically and for transparency for him to come forward. if i were his lawyer, i probably would take a similar tack to some of the things we've been
10:08 pm
told he's been advised, that it's a very precarious and treacherous thing, particularly for somebody who's not given to telling the truth in a lot of contexts. >> appreciate it. thanks. well, the president tonight signed a memorandum for using national guard units to help secure the southern border. we have details of the deployment although they remain kind of fuzzy coming so soon after the president called for troops. in fact, all day the white house has been scrambling to build policy on the fly to try to fit the president's statements, that or actually walk back some other remarks on tariffs and pulling troops out of syria. the question about all of it, is this any way to run the white house. perspective now from fareed zakaria and james fallows. >> fareed, the fact this administration either has to play catchup with what the president has said or try to shape policy from off the cuff statements or walk back large parts of them, it's got to make the already difficult process of governing that much more complicated.
10:09 pm
>> it's very strange. there's a kind of almost bizarre incompetence to the way in which the administration proceeds. so if you remember they start out with a travel ban that they then have to walk back because it's clear it's not going to meet legal scrutiny and courts are going to start dialing it back. same thing with the steel tariffs. they announced tariffs on steel. china is not a particularly large exporter of steel, so they then have to give exemptions to two-thirds of the countries that export steel to the united states. you know, with something like the border wall, the troops on the wall, it's not clear what will actually happen. president trump says troops are going to return from syria and start building -- rebuilding america. i don't know if he realizes the troops in syria are special force troops, are highly unlikely to be very good at building bridges or digging ditches in the united states. and with all of that, it's all perfectly predictable. i wonder if it's getting worse, anderson, because you have gary cohn has left. mcmaster has left.
10:10 pm
a lot of the so-called grown-ups have left. but this has been a puzzling incompetence because many of these things were perfectly predictable. >> james, it's not just people in the white house, you know, who are surprised by this and who have to, you know, be careful what they say because they're not sure if the president's going to contradict them. i mean after a time, just the american public stops believing in things the president is saying. fareed said this last night, that the president's words are at risk of becoming kind of weightless. >> there is a predictable surprise for everybody who enters the oval office and probably more so for donald trump than anybody else given his lack of experience is there's only so much the president can do just by saying, make it so. the other 90% of what a president accomplishes is by persuading people, persuading people in the congress, persuading the public, persuading overseas leaders that it's in their interest to go in the direction the president wants to lay out.
10:11 pm
so it is a huge advantage in that if you know which direction the president is going. with ronald reagan, he didn't know a lot of the details, but everybody knew where he was going. overseas allies and domestic legislators as well. with trump, his domestic allies in the congress, they've decided whatever he is for, they're for, even if it's different six hours ago from what it is right now. but for international leaders, it becomes really difficult because they don't know if they take some risk to side with one of his policies, is he going to change his mind the next day? so that becomes -- you know, it has the effect you're mentioning of sort of making the public lose trust in what he says, but also internationally it decreases this effect of whether a president can have people follow in the direction he wants to go. >> well, fareed, to jim's point, the effect of this not just in the u.s. but on the allies of the u.s., it can actually have real consequences on the ground if our allies start to doubt, well, wait a minute, are we committed to a place, are we not? do we listen to what the
10:12 pm
president is saying or what military personnel on the ground are saying? >> if you think about almost all the big foreign policy challenges the administration faces, i think it would be fair to say that our allies must be wondering what exactly is american policy on russia. you know, is the united states getting tougher on russia, or is there some doubt on that? on iran, is the united states actually going to tear up the iran deal as president trump says? on north korea, initially he said i will never talk to these guys as a reward for this buildup. in fact, i'm going to, you know, blow them out of the water and rain fire and fury on them. then he says, no, no, no. i'm going to meet with them and have a deal. so in each of these cases, you can imagine a country like japan, for example, that has a very strong, tough, anti-north korea stand. are they going to take the political risk -- is prime minister abe going to take the risk of softening that stand because he thinks that trump is going to move in that direction
10:13 pm
and they're going to be coordinated, only to find he's out on a limb and trump has backtracked. this has happened time and time again. traveling abroad, this is the biggest problem most countries have. they're almost happy with any american policy in the sense that as long as it's consistent and they can figure it out, they will adapt to it. what they don't understand is should they pay a political price for something that will change tomorrow. >> you know, james, you mentioned president reagan and that he may not have known some of the details or get into the weeds on policy. but a president like reagan and frankly just about any president is protected normally by, you know, layers of people around him, by people who vet speeches, by just sort of the weight of the office and not being exposed constantly. this is a president who exposes himself constantly through twitter or, you know, large campaign events which he seems to enjoy and his staff encourages him to do. and while his supporters say,
10:14 pm
you know, it's great that he's able to communicate directly with the american people, the cost of that is he's able to communicate directly with the american people on anything that enters his head, and it often turns out to be things which are just not true, factually incorrect, or are not actually going to be policy executed by the white house or congress. >> yes. and you see this. you see a clearer and clearer distinction or manifestation of the difference between being a popular character, especially a tv character, a reality show character, a pro wrestling character, where unpredictable, suspense, what's going to happen tonight is different from all the previous nights. those things are all great for a character on tv and some of trump's personal popularity which is buoyed by that, and the very different job of being an international leader where predictability, steadfastness, being able to say this is the direction we're going. five years from now, we're going
10:15 pm
to be in that place, so please come with us step by step by step. often the things that you are required for effectiveness, especially internationally, are dull and boring and make for predictable speeches and things that are not like pro wrestling and not like being on a reality show. and that tension between the personal popularity tv character aspect of this job, which donald trump enjoys and still is playing up, and the job of leading, especially internationally, i think we're seeing the contrast between those more and more starkly. >> thanks very much. coming up next, more on the border, on the wall that the president wants built, include the question about the building of it. the white house cannot seem to answer and failed again to answer today. later there's new reporting as well on wikileaks founder julian assange and roger stone, who warned about devastating wikileaks disclosures during the campaign.
10:16 pm
serenity for weakness. do not misjudge quiet tranquility with the power of 335 turbo-charged horses lincoln mkx, more horsepower than the lexus rx350 and a quiet interior from which to admire them. the lincoln spring sales event is here. for a limited time get zero percent apr on the lincoln mkx. hurry in today to your lincoln dealer. [ horn honking ] [ engine revving ] what's that, girl? [ engine revving ] flo needs help?! [ engine revving ] take me to her! ♪ coming, flo! why aren't we taking roads?! flo. [ horn honking ] -oh. you made it. do you have change for a dollar? -this was the emergency? [ engine revving ] yes, i was busy! -24-hour roadside assistance. from america's number-one motorcycle insurer. -you know, i think you're my best friend. you don't have to say i'm your best friend. that's okay.
10:17 pm
they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to and never go to the post office again
10:18 pm
go to and never go to i thought i was managing my moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. but i realized something was missing... me. the thought of my symptoms returning was keeping me from being there for the people and things i love most. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira can help get, and keep,uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts so you could experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible.
10:19 pm
more now on the president's decision to send national guard units to the southern border. the president today tweeting, coat, our border laws are very weak while those in mexico and canada are very strong. congress must change these obama era and other laws now. the democrats stand in our way. they want people to pour into our country unchecked. cri me. we will be taking strong -- crime, excuse me. we'll be taking strong action today. joining us today is leon
10:20 pm
rodriguez, former director of the u.s. citizenship and immigration services. back this hour as well is former trump campaign adviser steve cortes. >> this news that the national guard troops are going to the border, both president bushes and barack obama did that in two operations. it cost a total of more than $1.3 billion. is this any different, or do you see this as the same idea? >> no. i mean this is different in the sense that the amount of activity headed toward the border is actually substantially less than it was. the highest it was was under president bush, somewhat less under president obama, a lot less now. so it is different in that respect. it's also important to understand that the work that the national guard would do, at least if you follow history is a purely supportive role. the responsibility here remains that of the u.s. border patrol. the other thing i would add is what you are seeing in mexico
10:21 pm
this weekend is really the face of a simmering humanitarian crisis. these folks are saying no matter how much interdiction you have, we need help. there is gang violence in our countries. there is poverty, and we're going to keep being visible until there really is a more comprehensive solution to our situation. >> steve, i mean secretary nielsen was asked today why the urgency, and i guess i'll ask you that. what about that? just from a logistical standpoint, why rush this now? critics of the president say this has a lot to do with criticisms he's received from former supporters of his or even from his base, concerns that he's soft on immigration, illegal immigration. >> sure. well, listen, the president has certainly not been soft on the border. i think this is part of a common-sense strategy and one which he telegraphed and promised in 2016 and is following through on. i have enormous empathy for people who are fleeing terrible situations in latin america. my own father fled just such a
10:22 pm
situation of violence and a lack of opportunity in latin america. but he also did it legally, and that is the major and, to me, the primary caveat that must be recognized here. no one has a right -- no one has a right to enter our country without permission just as no one has a right to enter our homes, our places of businesses without permission. we will literally protect the border with the military if necessary, and through the national guard, to show the world that while we are a nation of immigrants and we love immigration, we are not a lawless nation that will allow illegal immigration to become its own force. >> right. but, steve, the question -- the question really, though, is this about politics, the fact that the president is doing it now. under george w. bush, my understanding is, you know, this was a stopgap measure in order
10:23 pm
to, while they were trying to hire up more border officers, they were using national guard to fill more clerical duties that would free up other border agents to actually work on the border. it does -- i mean to you, is this about politics at all, as some have said? >> you know, listen, sure. i think it matters politically in that he's delivering on a political promise. i think that does matter, and i think it's also about politics because the congress refused to recognize the will of the people, who elected trump knowing that a foundational promise of his campaign was to build a border wall. they gave him 1.6 billion instead of $25 billion, which is what he requested. i think this is his way to say in the meantime, before we build the full wall that we should build, in the meantime, the wall is going to become a human wall, and it's going to be a wall of guardsmen and military. >> leon, it's not actually going to be a wall of guardsmen and
10:24 pm
military as steve just said. the president talked about the military guarding the border. u.s. army, the marines are not going to be standing shoulder to shoulder on the border with weapons drawn, facing the mexican border. it's going to be national guard troops. again, isn't it going to be mostly sort of organizational duties? >> it is. it's going to be some air surveillance. it's going to be some activity in assisting and processing people. look, at the end of the day, the responsibility here remains that of the u.s. border patrol. their numbers have grown year-over-year since the early 2000s. you know, there is tremendous logistical resources that they already have in terms of their ability to conduct surveillance at the border. so i think it's hard to believe that this -- you know, that the national guard would particularly change the equation here. it's certainly dramatic. it's certainly, you know, to
10:25 pm
those who perceive whether, you know, based in fact or not, that there is lack of enforcement at our border, i suppose this is satisfying. but if you really look at it operationally, this is really not a particular change. >> but, leon, when you say we perceive this, that's just dishonest. there are literally a thousand people a day roughly arrested crossing our border illegally. and how many more who aren't arrested, who make it through. this isn't a perception issue. this is the reality on a ground. there is a soft invasion going on in the united states that we have tolerated for decades in this country. >> but, steve, you do argue -- [ overlapping voices ] >> you need to look over decades because the fact is that the traffic has been diminishing consistently over decades. so if you look at where we were in 2000, 2001, 2002, we were talking about much higher levels of apprehension with less -- >> steve, also hasn't the trump administration rightfully
10:26 pm
pointed out that actually the percentage of people crossing the border illegally has dropped by as much as 60%? so on the one hand, they are claiming and i think for good reason credit for having a dramatic drop in numbers under the president trump administration and at the same time now claiming that there's this army of people coming across. it's a national emergency, and that there is enemy combatants coming across, which have you seen any evidence of enemy combatants, of al qaeda and the taliban coming across the southern border in. >> i'm not calling them combatants. someone who comes into your home or your country without permission is an invader. there's no other proper term to describe -- >> but you admit the numbers have drastically reduced. >> the numbers were dropping dramatically in 2017, and i think that was a great testimony to president trump and his fortitude in terms of reinforcing the border.
10:27 pm
however, they've been rising lately, and i think the reason they've been rising lately is because now these people who respond very well to incentives have decided or have determined that president trump didn't get what he wanted. he didn't get the kind of border wall he wants. he didn't get the kind of law changes that he wanted. and so they're showing up. by the way, they're being far more skillful in manipulating our process. what i mean by that is many of them now are claiming asylum status whereas that was a very minuscule number in times past. so they're getting smarter about it. >> leon, i want you to respond. >> they're not -- i mean they're not merely responding to incentives. what they're responding to is desperate situations in their country. enforcement is a tool. our immigration laws need to be respected. but until we have a comprehensive solution, a hemispheric solution who what's going on in these countries in terms of poverty and gang violence, this is going to keep coming. i don't care how many national
10:28 pm
guard troops you send to the border or how high a wall you build, the actual pushes and pulls of migration need to be addressed. it's not simply an enforcement issue. >> all right. leon rodriguez, steve cortes, thank you. coming up next, a look at president trump and his diehard political base. why does he feel the need to play so strongly to his supporters? we'll show you that ahead. a car you can command when you're nowhere near it... does that require mind-control? no. just some mind-blowing engineers from the ford motor company and pivotal who developed fordpass, allowing you to reach out to your car from wherever you are to check your fuel level, unlock your doors and start your engine... so when you're ready to go, your car is, too. magic can't make digital transformation happen... but we can. that's the power of pivotal, part of dell technologies.
10:29 pm
10:30 pm
10:31 pm
if you'd have told me three years ago... that we'd be downloading in seconds, what used to take... minutes. that guests would compliment our wifi. that we could video conference... and do it like that. (snaps) if you'd have told me that i could afford... a gig-speed. a gig-speed network. it's like 20 times faster than what most people have. i'd of said... i'd of said you're dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far. now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.
10:32 pm
president trump's tweets over the past few days have taken aim at many targets, amazon, the media, former president obama to name just a few. in a very real sense he's playing to a single audience, his political base. more from our randi kaye tonight. >> we have retailers all over the united states who are going out of business. >> reporter: if the president is trying to impress his base, comments like that may do the trick. no doubt trump has a personal beef with amazon founder jeff bezos, who also owns "the washington post." but trump, in going after amazon, is also defending brick and mortar retailers, which he says are getting squeezed. >> you look at some of these small towns where they had a beautiful main street with stores. the stores are all gone. >> reporter: those retailers in many cases, mom and pop shops, part of what donald trump sees as his base. his effort to keep his supporters in middle america and elsewhere happy may explain some of his recent rhetoric about
10:33 pm
tariffs too, sounding more like he did during the campaign. >> china is upset because of the way donald trump is talking about trade with china. they're ripping us off, folks. it's time. >> reporter: trump's move to slap tariffs on china was a nod to his base. but less than 24 hours after the white house unveiled a list of chinese imports they plan to target for unfair trade practices, china slapped its own tariffs on the united states, targeting agriculture exports from u.s. farm belt states like soybean, corn, wheat, and beef. now farmers who largely supported trump could get hurt. still, trump's top economic adviser hinted that in the end, there may be no tariffs at all. >> i doubt if there will be any concrete actions for several months. we'll see how that plays out. nothing concrete has actually happened. these are proposals. >> reporter: and what about immigration? after a tough-talking campaign and deciding to end the daca program last year, the president
10:34 pm
started to sound as if he were willing to cross the aisle on immigration issues. in january, even calling for a bipartisan, quote, bill of love to protect dreamers. the hundreds of thousands of young people brought here illegally. but now once again is taking a harder stance. the president on a tear about weak laws and porous borders, stoking fears for the upcoming midterms like he did during the campaign. in a tweet, the president announced no more daca deal. >> the president has been very clear, put multiple proposals on the table to fix the problem, and democrats have not been willing to take a deal that was actually a really good deal and went much further than the previous administration. >> reporter: and those national guard troops the president plans to send to help shore up the southern border with mexico, border security is an issue that won him lots of support during the campaign, and he's playing to that base again. >> it will be strong. it will be add many as is needed to fill the gaps. >> reporter: promises in the
10:35 pm
year 2018 that sound a lot like 2016. randi kaye, cnn, new york. >> joining me now is kirsten powers and paris dennard. kirsten, do you see any kind of strategy from the president here? >> well, we can only judge on his actions. we don't know what's going on in his head. but it seems pretty obvious that he is trying to -- he's tailoring these tweets to his base. we know that. we know there's a midterm election coming up where the republicans stand to not do very well, which is typical in a first-term midterm election, but it looks like it may be even worse than i think some people expected. and so he needs to gin up the base. there's a huge enthusiasm gap between the democrats and the republicans, and he also just signed a bill that has a lot of his supporters very, very unhappy. so it would certainly make sense for that to be the strategy.
10:36 pm
>> paris, do you see this about ginning up the base? he has received criticism from the right, people like ann coulter hitting him pretty hard for, you know, not getting wall funding, and sources say that criticism has, quote, rattled him. >> you know, anderson, i think the president understands that he ran on a winning message, which is a make america great again message. and a lot of things he has been tweeting about and some of the things that have come out through these executive orders and presidential actions have been things that he campaigned on that the american people -- or we should say those that voted for him really supported and want to see him make good on his campaign promises because when you move from a campaign, you go to governing. and he's realizing that when you are president, you can't just do everything on your own. you have to work with the congress, and in many instances, i think he feels rightfully so that the congress has let him down, and has let down the people that he said in his inaugural address he was going to be there. he wasn't going to forget about them. so these issues, his base, the issues that the american people
10:37 pm
that voted for him care about, curbing illegal immigration, border security, small businesses and supporting have a robust economy, these are things they care about, and i think he's smart enough to know with a midterm election coming up, he wants to give some wins on the board for the republicans to go and campaign on. and while he may not be as popular as people want here in the beltway or here in washington, d.c., back home in a lot of these districts where these members are running, there are places where he is very popular. and if not the president that's very popular, his message and his policies are very popular. >> so, kirsten, i mean moving troops, moving national guard forces to the border as george w. bush did when they were trying to hire more border officers, as president obama as well, i mean is that really about politics for this president? >> well, i mean i think it's
10:38 pm
something he probably believes needs to happen regardless of politics. but, look, he did have an opportunity to lead. paris, you're going through all these different things that people are disappointed about. he could have struck a deal and gotten a wall. i mean the democrats were willing to give him the funding for the wall, something that they absolutely hate, that they don't support, that they don't think we need, that they think it's a waste of money, that they think it's offensive. but they were willing to do it. but instead he then loaded up, you know, the bill with all these other requests that they couldn't agree to. and so -- >> no, they could agree to. they just chose not to. >> no. this is how it works. you don't get everything that you want. if you get people to agree to something that their party is vehemently opposed to, you then cannot say, in addition to that, i want you to add in all these other things. that's just not how deal making works, and i think that donald trump certainly should know that. the point is he wasn't able to make a deal, and that's why he's in trouble. so i think, yeah, he can try and do a lot of different things.
10:39 pm
but i think when you've lost ann coulter, you know, you're kind of in trouble. you know, she was one of his biggest supporters, and if she's turning on im, i don't think that bodes well for him. >> the president is not in trouble. we've seen recent polls that show that his poll numbers are going up. we've seen a congressman who is running for the senate put on a make america great again hat to show his undying support for the president. the president is not in trouble. what he is concerned about is the things that he puts on the table that the congress is not able to work. if he puts out a deal and they choose not to accept it, that's their fault for not making a deal. if the president put out some positive deals, and they chose not to accept them. >> appreciate it. thanks. when we continue, new details of a radio appearance by trump campaign supporter roger stone and just what his connection is or isn't with wikileaks founder julian assange. ♪ ♪ excuse me, are you aware of what's happening right now?
10:40 pm
we're facing 20 billion security events every day. ddos campaigns, ransomware, malware attacks... actually, we just handled all the priority threats. you did that? we did that. really. we analyzed millions of articles and reports. we can identify threats 50% faster. you can do that? we can do that. then do that. ♪ ♪ can we do that? we can do that. ♪ (daniel jacob) for every hour that you're idling in your car, you're sending about half a gallon of gasoline up in the air. that amounts to about 10 pounds of carbon dioxide every week (malo hutson) growth is good, but when it starts impacting our quality of air and quality of life, that's a problem. so forward-thinking cities like sacramento are investing in streets that are smarter and greener. the solution was right under our feet. asphalt.
10:41 pm
to be more precise, intelligent asphalt. by embedding sensors into the pavement, as well as installing cameras on traffic lights, we will be able to analyze the flow of traffic. then that data runs across our network, and we use it to optimize the timing of lights, so that travel times are shorter. who knew asphalt could help save the environment? ♪ peopbut they're different.nd. nice tells you what you want to hear. but kind is honest. this bar's made with delicious cranberries and almonds. so, guess what? we call it cranberry almond. find your favorite and give kind® a try. janice, mom told me you bought a house. okay. [ buttons clicking ] [ camera shutter clicks ] so, now that you have a house, you can use homequote explorer. quiet. i'm blasting my quads. janice, look. i'm in a meeting. -janice, look. -[ chuckles ]
10:42 pm
-look, look. -i'm looking. it's easy. you just answer some simple questions online, and you get coverage options to choose from. you're ruining my workout. cycling is my passion.
10:43 pm
new reporting tonight from cnn's andrew kaczynski shows longtime trump supporter roger stone appeared on an internet radio show on the same day that "the wall street journal" says stone sent an e-mail claiming he'd had dinner with wikileaks founder julian assange. what did you and your team discover about this time line and explain just the significance of it. >> okay. so this is roger stone on the alex jones show. he was on there on august 4th of 2016.
10:44 pm
now it's significant because this is the same day on which he sent that e-mail claiming in which he had dined with julian assange. now, what's equally very interesting about it is in the appearance, stone said that devastating wikileaks were going to be coming out on hillary clinton, and he also claimed he had spoken to donald trump basically that same day. so he would have spoken to trump the same day or night in which he claimed having dinner with assange. so having those two things connected raises a lot of questions about his relationship with wikileaks. >> has roger stone responded to cnn about your findings? >> so i e-mailed with mr. stone a little bit. he says that he was traveling from l.a. to miami on the date in question. he actually says that in the interview with alex jones as well. so he claims he couldn't have
10:45 pm
dined with assange, and he basically is saying it's, you know, a fake story and whatnot. >> all right. andrew kaczynski, appreciate it. coming up, remembering martin luther king jr. 50 years to the day since he was assassinated in memphis. i'll speak with dr. cornell west about dr. king's legacy. do ndo not misjudgenity quiet tranquility. with the power of 335 turbo-charged horses lincoln mkx, more horsepower than the lexus rx350 and a quiet interior from which to admire them. the lincoln spring sales event is here. for a limited time get zero percent apr on the lincoln mkx. hurry in today to your lincoln dealer.
10:46 pm
and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to and get two months free. i thought i was managing my moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. but i realized something was missing...
10:47 pm
me. the thought of my symptoms returning was keeping me from being there for the people and things i love most. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira can help get, and keep,uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts so you could experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible.
10:48 pm
internet providers promise business owners a lot. let's see who delivers more. comcast business offers fast gig-speeds across our network. at&t doesn't. we offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g wireless network backup. at&t, no way. we offer 35 voice features and solutions that grow with your business. at&t, not so much. we give you 75 mbps for $59.95. that's more speed than at&t's comparable bundle, for less.
10:49 pm
call today. bells rang out this evening across the country marking the devastating moment in american history. 50 years ago on this day in 1968, martin luther king jr. was assassinated. here was the scene at the king center in atlanta this evening. [ bell ringing ] the bell rang 39 times, symbolizing dr. king's age when he was assassinated at the lorraine motel in memphis. at that site, now home to the national civil rights museum, there was a day-long tribute honoring his life and his legacy. joining me now is dr. cornell west. dr. west, thanks so much for being with us on this, the 50th anniversary of this assassination. it's so interesting how history
10:50 pm
changes the way somebody is perceived, and it's very easy -- this happened with muhammud ali as well. doctor king, his leg sichlt his life is probably so different and his message is so different than a sanitized version of it. which has become kind of the common way the common way he's seen today. >> yeah, i think we're reaching the conclusion that martin luther king jr. was an extremist whether it came to love. extremist when it came to justice. and what that meant was that he was willing to tell the truth. truth is always to allow suffering to speak. he comes from a people who have been terrorized, traumatized and hated for 400 years. he taught the world so much about love and connected at the justice unbelievable level of courage and vision. but it's a sad day. it's a very tough day. it's a sober day. because something died in all of us who are concerned about each
10:51 pm
other. when you think about brother martin shot down like a dog there outside of room 306 in the lorraine hotel in memphis. the important thing is that martin luther king jr., he loved you. he loved me. he loved muslims, mexicans. he loved palestinians and jews. he loved roma. he was a love warrior. he was an intellectual and spiritual love warrior. >> yet, that message today, i wonder how it would be perceived particularly this political moment in our history. it's very easy to embrace him now that he's not here and not speaking about issues which probably would alienate a lot of people. >> the beautiful thing is you have the poor people's campaign. you got the reverend katie lat there in seattle. you have father flaiger in chicago. you have thomas in los angeles.
10:52 pm
there is a wave of people who are keeping his legacy alive in a variety of different context. you have progressive rabbis, progressive ministers and temples and muslim mosque and so forth. and especially among the young people. there is a marvelous new militancy in kentucky and oakland keeping alive his legacy. and most importantly, you have the critics of the empire. you have those keeping track of the bombs, keeping track of the wars, keeping track of the house raids and detentions. martin luther king jr. had a love supreme. he was concerned about every human being. a vietnamese baby had the same value as a black baby or a red baby on the reservation or a white baby in connecticut or parkland high in florida.
10:53 pm
that's the kind of person that he was. he was a free black man. he was a christian minister. he was a spiritual giant. but he was still not perfect. he was not pure. he was human like me. he was human like you. but he decided to be a love warrior. not just a polished politician. that's that neoliberal talk about being smart. no. smartness was not enough. he wanted wisdom and courage and most importantly, he was willing to pay a cost. he was willing to go to the edge of life's abyss to step out on nothing and land on something and what he landed on was a legacy that passed on to the younger generation. we'll see. because his after life will be manifest in the kind of lives we live. not the super efficiently lip service or pretentious posturing but who is willing to live and who is willing to die for justice. >> he said something to the i effect of he would rather die than live in fear. to be willing to die rather than
10:54 pm
live in fear, that's an extraordinary thing. i think for most of us, you know, that's not a decision i think a lot of people are willing to make. >> no, but brother martin said i'd rather be dead than afraid. that's why he said most people don't understand who i am. they don't understand my calling. they don't understand my commitment. as a christian, he's willing to live in the world and not of it. he was willing to learn how to die every day by calling himself into question to be reborn into a better person and to be willing to give of himself. he's like al green though, brother. at the end of an al green concert, he is about to collapse because he gives of himself. he empties himself. martin luther king jr. emptied himself whether he was in that
10:55 pm
coffin. he had the body of a 65-year-old just like charlie parker. why? because he gave everything, the gifts that he had, he cultivated. and he gave it back in terms of his intellectual work, moral work, spiritual work and christian witness. and unfortunately in the age of neofacist stirrings and hungary and poland and the white house and kenya and other places that that kind of love and justice is pushed to the margins. but it is coming back. there is a spiritual and moral awakening in this nation and around the world. and many of us are willing to go down swinging to stay on that love train, to stay on that justice train and make sure that we put a smile on the face of brother martin from the grave. we'll never forget him, fanny lou hama, he willa baker, rabbi abraham, edward zied. they're a cloud of witnesses.
10:56 pm
and it's a beautiful thing to be a part of that cloud. and brother martin, he's at the center of it. >> usually get in a cole train reference. you did get in an al green reference which i love and appreciate. dr. west, always a pleasure. >> love you, brother. stay strong now. >> thank you. we'll be right back. -if you told me a year ago where i'd be right now... aah! ...i would have said you were crazy. but so began the year of me. i discovered the true meaning of paperless discounts... and the indescribable rush of saving drivers an average of $620. why does fear feel so good? i fell in love three times -- once with a woman, once with a country, and finally... with myself. -so, do you have anything to declare or not? -isn't that what i'm doing? -so, do you have anything to declare or not? ♪ ♪ ♪ raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens ♪ ♪ bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens ♪
10:57 pm
♪ brown paper packages tied up with strings ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ ♪ ♪ is it possible to save from thousands of miles away? yes. thanks to the dedicated technicians at the american red cross... who worked with vmware... to develop technologies to help redirect the flow of blood to the areas and people needing it most. helping them recover... and refilling everyone with life-affirming hope. magic can't make digital transformation happen... but we can. that's the power of vmware, part of dell technologies. we're finally back out in our yard, but so are they. the triple threat of dandelions, lurking crabgrass and weak, thin grass!
10:58 pm
introducing the all new scotts turf builder triple action. this single-step breakthrough changes everything. it kills weeds, prevents crabgrass for up to 4 months, and feeds so grass can thrive, all guaranteed. only from scotts. our backyard is back. this is a scotts yard. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla.
10:59 pm
otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months, ... with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you.
11:00 pm
that's all the time we have tonight. thanks for watching. i hand it over to don lemon. see you tomorrow. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. we have breaking news on a number of big stories. the trump administration about to slap sanctions on a number of russian oligarchs, members of putin's inner circle. the sanctions, their response to election interference. sources telling cnn the action is likely to happen in the next day or two, raising the question whether putin will retaliate. you know who else has his eye on wealthy russians tied to vladimir putin? robert mueller.