tv CNN Newsroom With Brooke Baldwin CNN March 21, 2019 11:00am-12:00pm PDT
much. >> thank you. >> and that is it for me. "newsroom" with brooke baldwin starts right now. you are watching cnn on this thursday afternoon. i'm brooke baldwin. thank you for being with me. it has been looming over the trump presidency even before the man took office. now the russia investigation may be coming to an end. we don't know when, we don't know what it'll say but we do know this that the white house and president trump are bracing for this probe to be over, for the mueller report to be complete and for its findings to be released. the president now says he wants the public to see the report by the special counsel, even though he has called the probe a witch-hunt many, many times. just last week he tweeted, quote the special counsel should never have been appointed and there should be no mueller report. let's start with our senior
white house correspondent pamela brown. so pamela, what are you hearing about what the white house is doing to prepare for this report coming out? >> brooke, white house officials are on high alert with really the rest of the country as they wait for all of this to wrap up and for robert mueller to hand over his confidential report to the attorney general and inside the white house there's a mix of anxiety and also the sense of relief that will soon come of this cloud lifting that's been with the president since day one of his presidency, but there is still anxiety about what could be next, what could be in this report, what will bill barr hand the congress, a lot of unknowns. white house officials are just reading the tea leaves like we all are, but i can tell you in talking to officials in the white house or close to the white house, there's also the sense of victory in that it appears that this is all going to end without the president sitting down with robert mueller. that was always a big sticking point from the very beginning and it appears that that is not going to happen, that robert mueller is wrapping all of this up without that sit down interview with the president.
that is looked upon as a victory. now inside, there has been some planning and strategizing about how to respond when the report is handed over and when all of this comes to an end. emmet flood within the white house has been meeting with a small group of officials gaming out different scenarios in terms of whether some of the information that comes out is skull tri, they're outlining it, it's a wait and see approach in the white house right now, brooke. >> what about it's wait and see, a lot of places outside the white house for this report, that is certainly not the end of the speculation, pamela. so what are some of the other key questions that still remain? >> reporter: that's right. even as the investigation wraps up and ends that's not the end of the speculation. one of the big looming kwegz will be was there any derogatory information relating to russia collusion and obstruction of justice. we know there weren't any charges that directly related to that, so is there any other information and will bill barr share information with congress having to do with that or will
it just be a very simple, hey -- letting congress know the investigation is over and leave it at that. one thing he has to tell congress is whether or not the department of justice denied any requests from special counsel mueller and so that is going to be something that we're all waiting to see, were any requests from mueller denied by rod rosenstein the deputy attorney general in the course of mueller's investigation. that's something else and also, what is the white house esrole going to be in the interim between the attorney general announcing the investigation is over and sharing information with congress, will the white house weigh in and is exert privilege? >> thank you, pamela. robert bianca who's now the host of the law and crime network. as we wait, garret, to you, when this report is complete, what are the three things you will be
looking out for? >> well, i think that there are three things that we haven't seen yet that could demonstratively move republican opinion on capitol hill. one is direct presidential involvement in a specific crime which leaving aside the campaign finance violations and the hush money payment, we haven't actually seen the president tied to specific crimes by mueller's investigation itself. second is a pattern of obstruction of justice. not one or two instances where there's debatable circumstances, you know, was the firing of jim comey within the president's power, yada, yada, yada, but something where mueller paints a picture of months or years of discrete actions that make clear the president's motive, the third is any instance where the president himself has taken
action to advance a foreign power's interests at the expense of the united states. any time we see the president taking action to help russia or middle eastern country over the objections of the united states' government or in conspiracy with a foreign power, that's something that would make the republican wall on capitol hill untenable. >> okay. those are three things. bob, to you, with those three things in mind, when mueller is finished with this thing, he hands it to bill barr, the ag, you're the white house counsel, what's the first thing you do? >> well, first thing i do is i review the report, look at the damage that's going to be in there and brooke i predicted there's going to be at least be some significant damage. there are so many data points pointing to either the president or trump jr., ivanka and jared kushner and you'll have to start
do messaging here and do the best you can to deflect against some of this bad data. you have both a political issue here and a criminal law issue here, and i'm also -- brooke, i say this all the time to you. be wary of the southern district's power here and state crimes. over and over again, pass the pardon power, no doj memo and as white house counsel that's the first thing i'll be looking at because people are not taking this seriously enough. do these guys face exposure where the president cannot get them out of trouble? >> i'm curious, if you see the same way just having pamela brown fresh in my head from her reporting saying the white house as a victory, that the president didn't actually have to sit down with the special counsel to do this in-person video, they're already seeing that as a positive thing. if you're the white house counsel, what are you doing? >> well, if i'm the white house counsel i'm not worried about the report itself. i'm worried about whether
there's going to be another set of indictments that come either parallel to the report or just before the report comes in. i think we're placing too much emphasis on the idea that the only thing bob mueller has left to do is turn in his report card to bill barr. i think he has been saving the final round of indictments, because that's the only thing that he controls what gets made public and when. anything he hands over to bill barr is not clear when that becomes public, what of that becomes public, who makes that public. if robert mueller who has been speaking through these highly detailed court filings, these highly detailed indictments all the way along, if i'm bob mueller i'm saying the only thing i control is the final round of indictments. that's when i have the opportunity to make public whatever i feel needs to be made public at whatever moment i feel it needs to be made public.
>> so to that point, what can and can't bill barr reveal publicly? >> he can reveal very little which i find to be impossible given the spotlight that's on this from a public point of view and the congressional oversight. the leaks that are invariably going to happen. if i were him, i would have to know inevitable that it is going to come out and that's only going to make it look bad for us. i predicted there's a lot more coming out but to the point that's just made, don't forget there are about two dozen sealed indictments and that is -- you take the bad targets, the most high level targets and you put them in sealed indictments and that was the bypass any funny business that may have gone on with the firing of mueller during -- >> firing of comey -- >> firing of comey and the potential firing of mueller, all those gyrations tactually as a prosecutor, i would be getting indictments for, sealing those indictments so in the event mueller was removed, you can't
get rid of those indictments at that point because now they're court documents. i think you're going to see a roll out of indictments that are going to happen after this report. >> so many things we just don't know yet and tell this thing fully comes out we can just opine and guess based upon the bread crumbs left so far. gentlemen, thank you both so much for that. there is more breaking news this afternoon involving president trump overturning long-standing u.s. policy regarding israeli occupied golan heights. he made this announcement via tweets, after 52 years it is time for the united states to fully recognize israel's sovereignty over the golan heights which is a critical strategic and security importance to the state of israel and regional stability. and keep in mind this comes just two weeks before israel's elections. the u.s. secretary of state mike pompeo is in israel right now meeting with israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, so let me go straight to cnn global affairs analyst david miller and
aaron, before we get into your reaction to the president's tweet, can you give us -- reminding all of us the relationship between the state of israel and the golan heights? >> the israelis during the 1967 war attacked by syrian egypt ended up occupying the golan and maining control over it. in 1981 as a consequence of a basic law, israel doesn't have a formal constitution but as a consequence of a basic law, which essential is a series of basic laws extended israeli law and administered jurisdiction over the golan heights. there was some ticktock at the time about whether the israelis had effectively nexed it or not. most of the draenresidents most whom are not citizens of the state of israel, so the security political golan is of critical
importance more or less wall-to-wall for most of the israeli public. during the '90s under both the baker -- bush/baker and clintons, i was part of the very small group of individuals that tried to facilitate at the request of israeli prime minister s an effort to negotiate with assad's father and we came pretty close to actually concluding a deal which by israel would have surrendered the heights in exchange for normalized relation with syria. i wonder if what happened in the syrian civil war what the implications would have been today had the israelis actually concluded a peace treaty with syria and the syrian government faced the challenges they face today. i think it would have been a very fraught situation -- >> so -- in brief, the significance -- it's important for everyone to be on the same
page before we go in two weeks out from this election, netanyahu facing charges, close with president trump. your take on the timing of the announcement and the announcement in and of self. >> i've been around negotiations most of my professional life. my head is exploding. after the president of the united states in less than 280 characters presumably, i didn't count them, basically overturns six decades of american policy and the reason? the logic? the rational, the justification? is to directly and willfully intercede in an israeli election campaign very close with the prime minister now under preliminary indictment for the first time in his career facing a credible challenger. this was uneffort and gratuitius to essentially do everything president trump can to make sure that benjamin netanyahu becomes the next prime minister of israel. there is precedent for this. i was apart of a couple administration that's played
favorites with respect to israeli prime ministers, but reelecting benjamin netanyahu is not a compelling national interest of the united states. so i wonder why -- i know why the president chose to do this. it's pure and unadulterated domestic politics. >> domestic politics, so say aaron david miller as his head is exploding. i have never heard you utter that phrase. my goodness. we'll keep an eye on it. thank you very much as always for all your expertise especially when it comes to this part of the world. >> take care, brooke. if joe biden former vice president announces his running mate on day one, what's the risk? what's the reward? van jones is on set with me next to go through that. plus the president once again politicizing the u.s. militaries on his attacks on the john mccain. also just in, top democrats in the house alleging that some senior white house officials have used their personal email to conduct government business and we're now hearing specific
names. i'm brooke baldwin and you're watching cnn. check it out, our unlimited plan on the brand new samsung galaxy s10. oooh. premium entertainment on the infinity screen! people have seven different premium entertainment options to choose from. 'cause people are different. like how you cut the crust off of your sandwiches, and i eat them. and i'm pretty laid back and casual, and you... iron your jeans. i'm actually very happy you noticed that. cool... that's cool. at&t has the only unlimited plan that gives you your choice of top-tier entertainment. buy a new galaxy s10 plus, and get one free.
more for your thing. that's our thing. shouldn't mean going back to the doctoro just for a shot. with neulasta onpro patients get their day back... to be with family, or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
about medicare and 65, ysupplemental insurance. medicare is great, but it doesn't cover everything - only about 80% of your part b medicare costs, which means you may have to pay for the rest. that's where medicare supplement insurance comes in: to help pay for some of what medicare doesn't. learn how an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by united healthcare insurance company might be the right choice for you. a free decision guide is a great place to start. call today to request yours. so what makes an aarp medicare supplement plan unique? well, these are the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp and that's because they meet aarp's high standards of quality and service. you're also getting the great features that any medicare supplement plan provides. for example, with any medicare supplement plan you may choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients.
you can even visit a specialist. with this type of plan, there are no networks or referrals needed. also, a medicare supplement plan goes with you when you travel anywhere in the u.s. a free decision guide will provide a breakdown of aarp medicare supplement plans, and help you determine the plan that works best for your needs and budget. call today to request yours. let's recap. there are 3 key things you should keep in mind. one: if you're turning 65, you may be eligible for medicare - but it only covers about 80% of your medicare part b costs. a medicare supplement plan may help pay for some of the rest. two: this type of plan allows you to keep your doctor - as long as he or she accepts medicare patients. and three: these are the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp. learn more about why you should choose an aarp medicare supplement plan. call today for a free guide.
just in from washington now, senior white house officials facing questions about their alleged use of personal email to conduct government business at the white house. senior congressional manu raju is live on capitol hill. where is this coming from and who does this involve? >> elijah couplings is the chairman says that he has obtained new information saying that several white house officials two current officials, two former officials have been using -- have used personal email to conduct official government business. now he's referring to is jared
kushner and ivanka trump, two current officials, what he says about jared kushner is that they had a meeting with both jared kushner's attorney and ivanka trump's attorney abby lowell in december and in that meeting abby lowell revealed that jared kushner has used the messaging application what's app to communicate with people in foreign countries, foreign leaders and what abby lowell apparently told cumberland mings according to this later, he could not rule out that kushner may have discussed classified information on this what's app application. he also says that lowell told the committee that ivanka trump has may be in violation of the presidential records act because of the way that she has been using her personal email to communicate on some level official business. two other officials that he signals out cummings does in this letter, steve bannon and
k.t. mcfarland who no longer work at the white house, he raises concerns that their use of personal email may be in violation also of the presidential records act. we've reached out to all of these individuals. we have not received comments that the white house has said that they are just reviewing this letter but this comes after, brooke, the white house president trump has continued to attack hillary clinton's use of a private email system when she was secretary of state now cummings says that there's evidence, at least from senior officials currently in the white house who may be employing practices somewhat in a similar fashion to hillary clinton and may be in violation of the law and he's asking for a range of questions he wants answers to. we'll see if they decide to answer that in the coming days. >> how about this other piece of news that you're also breaking, manu, on the white house rejecting democrats' request regarding documents regarding meetings between president trump and putin?
>> reporter: yeah. they sent letter demanding information about those communications saying there have been really no records about that and asking for transcribed interviews with the translator who was at the trump/putin meeting. he wanted to understand exactly what trump and putin talked about in those interaction that's occurred over the last two years. now what the white house just sent in a letter to capitol hill according to this letter obtained by our colleague pam brown, it says that while we respectfully seek to accommodate appropriate oversight's request, we are unaware of the precedence supporting such sweeping requests. they've gone to say they will not provide this information. they say that it's important to have these communications between foreign leaders without providing this information to capitol hill, so they are not going to provide this information that the democrats have been seeking, the white house is essentially saying no here so the question going forward is, what do democrats do? and again ratcheting up the tension between capitol hill and house democrats are ramping up
their investigations, the white house is not complying with a number of these requests which leads to the question, will they issue subpoenas? how will the white house respond when they issue subpoenas? and will this lead to a prolonged fight? probably so. just the latest in an escalating tension between the white house and house democrats in just a third month in power. >> yep. manu raju, thank you for both of those stories. now to this as former vice president joe biden is preparing for what would be his third presidential run, he also may make an unprecedented announcement. his choice for vice president. sources are telling cnn that aids are discussing the possibility of unveiling a joint ticket from day one, a strategy no major candidate has tried in modern times. who biden would select has everything to do with this and we know biden has met privately with stacey abrams who's political star has been on the rise ever since she narrowly loss her race last fall. van jones is host of the van
jones show and let's start on -- good to see you, my friend. >> good to see you too. >> on this potential biden/abrams ticket. let's look at it first biden's report. >> he's trying to accommodate the fact that people may be -- do we really want to have another straight white guy, can't we have more diversity so maybe he's trying to put on a diversity jacket. you have a diversity beard for himself. i think, though the downside for him is, this is very, very risky. first of all, we don't know enough about the country yet. you got to get through the primary. we're going to be surprised by who responds to what arguments, which states go which way. this early -- the fact you know who's going to be the best help for you as vice president is very premature. the other problem is -- the other part of this is his demographic profile is his age. whoever he picks to be vice president because of his age,
listen that person could be president in 20 minutes. >> heartbeat away. >> and you're talking about an older guy. guess what? now you've got two targets, not one, but you've got two targets with people having a real reason to say i'm going to go after both of these people and do you really want a year and a half out, almost two years out from the election to subject your vice presidential choice to that beating? usually you want to save that and have a person come in and refresh you in the home stretch. it's very risky for biden. >> i'm hearing -- i'm catching what you're throwing down, the risks outweigh the rewards. if you're stacey abrams, star, rise, rise, rise, do you want to, a, be so incredible complemented that the vice president wants you on his ticket? do i want to box myself in? >> if you're stacey abrams today, you're happy. everybody's talking about her.
she is just an extraordinary human being. to come within a whisper -- a whisker of winning the governorship in that state and honestly, the guy that she ran against some people feel like he didn't run fairly and then most people do not survive when they come out -- i'm going to be the democrat who speaks after the president's state of the union. that's usually when people's careers end. she did great. i think it makes a lot of sense for her to bask in this adulation from the party. i think it keeps going forward. for her as well, in some ways it's the worst of all possible worlds. you're not the candidate but you'll be getting scrutinized and beaten up as if you are and for so long. this is not a great idea. i think it's a good signal from biden that he cares about diversity, et cetera, but, you know, most of the people say, look, i'm going to pick a diverse vp choice. cory booker says he'll pick a
woman. that might be far enough. >> we'll tune in. you've got a big guest coming up this weekend with 2020 presidential hopeful pete buttigieg and his plans to break out of the crowded democratic field saturday night 9:00 eastern on cnn. >> thank you. >> thank you. in his latest attacks on the late senator john mccain, president trump hitting a new low when it comes to politicizing the u.s. military. let's talk about that with the veteran and just six days after the terror attacks on mosques in new zealand, they are now announcing bans on military style weapons just like that. why the u.s. reaction is the complete opposite? leave no man behind.
or child. or other child. or their new friend. or your giant nephews and their giant dad. or a horse. or a horse's brother, for that matter. the room for eight, 9,000 lb towing ford expedition. with a $500,000 life insurance policy. how much do you think it cost him? $100 a month? $75? $50? actually, duncan got his $500,000 for under $28 a month. less than a dollar a day.
his secret? selectquote. in just minutes, a selectquote agent will comparison shop nearly a dozen highly-rated life insurance companies, and give you a choice of your five best rates. duncan's wife cassie got a $750,000 policy for under $22 a month. give your family the security it needs at a price you can afford. if you feel like you spend too much time in the bathroom with recurring constipation and belly pain talk to your doctor and say yesss! to linzess. ♪ ♪ yesss! linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. linzess can help relieve your belly pain and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements.
linzess is not a laxative. it works differently to help you get ahead of your recurring constipation and belly pain. do not give linzess to children less than 6, and it should not be given to children 6 to less than 18, it may harm them. do not take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach-area pain, and swelling. so say yesss! to help for recurring constipation. yesss! to help for belly pain. talk to your doctor and say yesss! linzess.
the latest inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome.
the president just won't stop. his grudge now into day five of the late senator john mccain and on top of insulting the name of a war hero who died last summer, the president has now inserted politics where it just doesn't belong, to the u.s. military. this is what he said to a crowd in ohio. >> mccain didn't get the job done for our great vets and the v.a., and they knew it. that's why when i had my dispute with him, i had such incredible support from the vets and from the military. >> this isn't the first time that the president has used the military in this political way. >> i'm like the most popular person with the vets. i built the vietnam memorial in downtown manhattan, okay, and the vets like me a lot.
>> we had a wonderful election, didn't we? and i saw those numbers and you like me and i like you. that's the way it worked. >> i see my generals -- my generals are going to keep us so safe. if i'm doing the movie, i pick you general. >> a number of generals were on television over the weekend and just unrelated, but they all mentioned the fact that nobody's done as a president for the military in a long time what i've done. >> we need our military, it's got to be perfecto. >> let's talk now to paul ying willing who served in the army for more than 20 years. nice to have you on and welcome. >> thank you, brooke. >> let's just put politics aside here for a second. trump saying yesterday that veterans are on his side as he disparaged the late senator. this is just blatantly
politicizing the military. what kind of position does this put our men and women in uniform? >> so first, it's important to note that the u.s. military does not serve a person. we take an oath to support and defend the constitution of the united states. we take an oath to obey the lawful orders of the president of the united states. i served in combat under democrat and republican administrations in the gulf war on president h.w. george w. b h bush, under clinton and president obama and in every case, the soldiers i led and i served the country and the constitution, so it puts soldiers in impossible position when they are cast in a partisan light when the oath they took is nonpartisan defense of the constitution. >> puts them in an impossible position. just reiterating the president's words from yesterday. mccain didn't get the job done for our great vets and the v.a.
his other daughter bridget mccain tweeted, i do ask you to be decent and respectful. we only said good-bye to him almost seven months ago. sir, my question to you is, where is the decency? >> first, a note on senator mccain, senator mccain's legacy is one of courageous and honorable public service in both politics and war. in 50 years, when we teach leadership, we'll still be teaching the example of senator john mccain. so that -- that legacy is incredibly important. invoking politics and dragging senator mccain's legacy into the mud when he's not here to defend himself sends a flawed moral signal to our military forces. >> and to your point a second ago about, you don't serve the man, right, you serve the
country and i know our military commanders are supposed to be apolitical but when this whole story broke after the president spoke i was talking to our pentagon correspondent and she questions the silence of top u.s. military brass on this and i'm just wondering, do you? why do you think that they have been so quiet as trump's attacks on mccain's war record and heroism go aren't responded to? >> right. so similar to our soldiers, these partisan attacks and the politicizization of our military puts senior military leaders in an impossible position, so for example, when the president smears the legacy of a hero like senator mccain, when he disparages prisoners of war, on the one hand our senior military officers have an obligation to defend the institution, to remind the president that prisoners of war serve honorably and it's wrong to criticize
their service. on the other hand, publicly feuding with a political leader violates the nonpartisan norms of the u.s. military -- >> you're saying they can't? >> basically they're choosing between two evils, allowing the president to lie, to disparage the service of honorable military members or to publicly correct a political leader and inject themselves into a political debate. >> okay. >> the politicizization of the military puts both senior officers and military members in an impossible position. >> lieutenant colonel paul yingling thank you so much for your 27 years of service. appreciate it. >> thank you, brooke. breaking news now. democrats are demanding to know everything about communications between the president and vladimir putin, including those
mysterious chats involving translators. the white house just rejected all of that. we have new details and a disturbing scene out of massachusetts. dozens of graves have been vandalized at a jewish cemetery. we have that report ahead. check it out, our unlimited plan on the brand new samsung galaxy s10. oooh. premium entertainment on the infinity screen! people have seven different premium entertainment options to choose from. 'cause people are different. like how you cut the crust off of your sandwiches, and i eat them. and i'm pretty laid back and casual, and you... iron your jeans. i'm actually very happy you noticed that. cool... that's cool. at&t has the only unlimited plan that gives you your choice of top-tier entertainment. buy a new galaxy s10 plus, and get one free. more for your thing. that's our thing.
hmm. exactly. and doug. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? oh. well, we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance, because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. [ loud crash ] yeah. he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c,
in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions, and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured. talk to your doctor about mavyret.
just six days, that is how long it took new zealand to act after the terror attack on those two mosques that left 50 people murdered. the prime minister announcing today that her government will ban all military style semi-automatic weapons, assault style rifles and high capacity magazines. >> every semi-automatic weapon used in the terrorist attack on friday will be banned in this country. >> and that ban is effective immediately. that stands in stark contrast to what has happened or what has not happened here in america. the four deadliest mass shootings in the u.s., virginia tech almost 12 years ago, the most recent shooting at that concert in las vegas, almost a year and a half ago, all of this
with little significant action afterward and even though, according to a recent poll, 67% of americans support policies similar to those just passed in new zealand. a "the washington post" reporter examined why this type of ban was possible and so quickly in new zealand faces so many hurdles here in the states. nice to have you on here all the way from berlin. you tell me, why were they able to do this so quickly and we can't? >> thanks so much for having me on. on the surface new zealand really did appear more similar to the united states when it comes to guns than for instance, to europe until last friday. but there are quite a few differences to the u.s. system including a parliament that's very solution focused and really has the means to drive quickly legislative change. >> one of the issues here in the u.s. obviously is this very powerful gun lobby. i'm curious if new zealand has that because i know at least in
new zealand i hear you want solution focused but there is an opposition party there, so how do they get everyone on the same page so fast? >> well, i think that is especially interesting because new zealand does have a very strong gun lobby and until friday, it did have the air of the government, it did dictate essentially gun laws in the country. what happened, though, was the parliament was able to unite quite quickly to announce those laws because it doesn't have to fear sort of the revenge of that gun lobby. it's organized in a very different way. it doesn't have voter backing to the same extent as the nra does and it also doesn't have those public campaign or public campaigns against politicians that oppose gun reforms. >> what do you think from all your reporting? what is the number one lesson that the u.s. could learn from
new zealand on this? >> well, i think the number one lesson is that legislative change is possible. frankly, in the u.s. system it is really hard to drive those changes when you look at gerrymandering, the power of certain rules states have and, of course, the second amendment. but it is possible and when you look at how quickly the opposition party in new zealand backed those changes, you really see how powerful such an event can be. >> uh-hum. rick noack, thank you on the change in six days there in new zealand, thank you very much. we are keeping a close eye on the white house in response to this new accusation. some senior white house officials are facing questions about their use of personal email and that includes as you see here members of the president's own families. plus voters in florida chose to restore the rights of former
you're smart,eat you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car. you'll see what a fair price is and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar. has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today.
florida's landmark amendment to restore voting rights to ex-felon. the critic are blasting as an unconstitutional poll tax. committee members just advanced a bill that would require these ex-felons to pay court fees and res constitution fines before they can vote of the florida voters overwhelmingly approved what's known as amendment four. it restored voting rights for those who have served their time including parole and probation
as long as their crime was not murder or sexual abuse. a lawyer in new york, you are not a fan of what they are trying to do to this. >> no. >> tell me why. >> we have to keep in mind as you said just a few months ago, florida voters came out to 65% of them voted in favor of amendment four. this is a state where everything splits 50/50. we know this was a showing of overwhelming bipartisan support and voters said they don't want permanent disen-frank chisement. >> is this about politics? >> now, it is. it wasn't in november. it was a bipartisan showing and now it really looks like, you know, the vote yesterday was on party lines in the committee and it shouldn't be that we make determinations about who can and cannot vote based on the plikds in how we think they will vote. >> you see the democrats who will side with you who say this is like making these ex-felons pay a poll tax, the notion they would be back in the day black americans being disinfranchised
before they could even vote. i want to read a quote from a republican, james grant, counters there. sponsored the bill, disputed that charization saying it demirchishs the atrocity of what a poll tax actually was. >> i think poll taxes were atrocious, so was florida's long history of having disenfranchisement permanently this was written in florida's constitution originally as a way to evade the 15th amendment's requirement that all people and black people would be able to vote along with right people. that same history lies behind this in florida and elsewhere and this -- this bill would take what was a bad policy the voters tried to fix it and make it very much about what people can afford and if you can't afford to pay your fines, you can't vote. while it may not be exactly the same as the poll taxes of yesteryear, it's a similar
notion. >> on the notion whaf you can and can't afford, i want to get your comments. this is by former tallahassee mayor and andrew gillum. he kicked off this voter registration drive call it, bring it home to register a million people to vote for the 2020 election and this is the message he had for legislators in florida. >> because we turned out and we voted like our lives depended on, 1.4 million people now have the ability to register to vote here in the state of florida. that's a big deal. that is a big deal. and since we're on that topic, i want us to be able to send an unapologetic message to the legislator to get their hands off of amendment four. it is the law of the land. we believe that people should not be judged forever by their worse day. we decided that and we decide it had overwhelmly. the only thing the florida legislator needs do is to get
out of the way and let amendment four take shape and let us get to the process of registering voters. that is our job. that is our work. >> so just what happens now? hopefully the legislator puts an end to this and doesn't pass the bill. it's not there yet. i think we all need to keep in mind that it's better for all of us when we welcome returning citizens into the conversation and give them a real stake, welcome them to participate fully. voting right -- giving voting rights for people coming back to their communities is good for everybody so let's hope the florida legislatures stops this before it gets any further. >> thank you for coming by. >> thanks for having me. as congress says, it will investigate the rising threat of white nationalism. dozens of graves have been vandalized in a jewish cemetery in massachusetts. we'll show you that story. the president making a major move involving israel saying the u.s. will recognize it's
check it out, our unlimited plan on the brand new samsung galaxy s10. oooh. premium entertainment on the infinity screen! people have seven different premium entertainment options to choose from. 'cause people are different. like how you cut the crust off of your sandwiches, and i eat them. and i'm pretty laid back and casual, and you... iron your jeans. i'm actually very happy you noticed that. cool... that's cool. at&t has the only unlimited plan that gives you your choice of top-tier entertainment. buy a new galaxy s10 plus, and get one free. more for your thing. that's our thing.
the very same week congress announced that they will investigate the rise of white nationalism hate crimes in this country, a disturbing discovery in massachusetts. i just need to warn you, some of the images and language are offensive. police in fall river say dozens of grave stones at a jewish cemetery were defaced with anti-semitic language and imagery, swastikas, quote hitler was right written on the grave sites of peoples' loved ones there. polo sandoval is following this story and what do police say?
>> reporter: dozens of them, brooke, 59 grave stones at this jewish cemetery, historic location vandalized. a groundskeeper discovered it this weekend and quickly called police. graves defaced with anti-semitic scribbles using black marker. multiple hitler references and also swastikas. at least two were actually even knocked over and we showed a little while ago, some of those vial messages but others we should mention are even more offensive. video from our affiliate showed some of these heartbroken families basically going through the cemetery and seeing the damage first hand. police are investigating this, brooke, with the help of the fbi as well. they are treating this as a hate crime. at this point authorities saying that there are no confirmed suspects, no leads but they are on the case. they're not ruling anything out. the antidefamation league in new england is even offering a reward to try to track down those people who are responsible and when you hear from the head
of the conagree gas station in the case, the president says that he writes earlier that the ugly head of anti-semitism has raised its head again. he promises that the jewish community here in western massachusetts will persevere and, yes, they will restore those -- those monuments. that's just the latest antireligious incident in the country as we've seen here in new york for example, authorities monitoring an uptick. it'll be interesting to find out who's responsible here. authorities on that case, brooke. >> it is up and up and up these kinds of things. it is despicable. polo sandoval, thank you. all right. we continue on. you are watching cnn. i'm brooke baldwin. we begin with new developments today on the democratic investigations into president trump. we've learned that the white house has now rejected democrats' request for information about communications between president trump and russian president vladimir putin.