tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN October 22, 2019 11:00pm-12:00am PDT
be on the lookout from taylor today. if the if russia dominates ukraine russia will again become an empire oppressing its people and threatening its neighbors and the rest of the world." putin apparently convinced our parent to adopt a hostile view on ukraine. today putin and turkey's erdogan make a deal to take over vast swaths of kurdish territory. be on the lookout. why is this president always benefiting putin? thank you for watching us. "cnn tonight" with d. lemon starts right now. >> what did the house speaker say, all roads what? >> lead to putin. >> what do you think? that's the answer, right there. >> i think you have some explicit and implicit reasons for it. >> did you read the entire letter today? >> i did. what letter? you mean the testimony? >> the opening statement. >> oh, yeah. yeah. >> i hope everyone reads it because there's really -- again, for me, this is like the transcript, me speaking, don lemon, it's like the transcript,
there's no two ways about it. what is described here is explicit of what the president wanted and what mr. taylor experienced. he wrote it down. implicitly, he wrote down everything, everything. took copious notes. and it all came out today. it's a pretty explosive letter. >> now, the republicans will say can't trust this guy, i think it's a weak argument. you know, he took all these notes, why? because he was nervous that he was part of something wrong and he didn't like it. >> maybe he's a professional. >> look, i'm sure. but this level of meticulousness, i think mr. taylor knew this day was going to come someday, that he would be held to account for what he was a part of. i don't think you can have a good faith argument about what happened or why. the argument is, what should be the consequence? >> well, i'll leave that up for congress and the american people to decide. i just think everyone should read his opening statement and then you can decide for yourself. i don't think there's a lot of
deciding that you have to do. it's there. that's all it is. and i'm going to get to it because i have a lot to get to. i'll see you later. >> you do, it's a big night. make the most of it. >> this is important. i hope everyone reads this letter. i'm going to read a lot of it to help you along. this is "cnn tonight." see you, chris. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. bombshell developments in the impeachment inquiry tonight. this is the whole ball game, okay? stay with me here. the framework that puts everything we learned before into perspective. for anyone who maybe wasn't 100% sure, what the top diplomat in ukraine told congress today really says it all. the president of the united states masterminded a conspiracy to hold lawfully designated american military aid over ukraine unless he got something of personal benefit to himself. this is from the explosive opening statement of william taylor. the top united states diplomat
in ukraine. okay? and this is a quote. he said, "by mid-july it was becoming clear to me that the meeting president zelensky wanted was conditioned on the investigations of burisma and the alleged ukrainian interference in the 2016 elections. it was also clear that this condition was driven by irregular policy and the irregular policy channel i had come to understand was guided by mr. giuliani." so just a week or two before the president's infamous ukraine call, the top american diplomat in ukraine knew that the white house meeting was not going to happen unless there was an investigation of both the energy company that had hunter biden on its board and conspiracy theories that alleged ukraine was behind 2016 election
interference, not russia. mid-july. just before the july 25th phone call between president trump and president zelensky. here it is. it says, "when president trump said i would like you to do us a favor, though, because our country has been through a lot and ukraine knows a lot about it, i would like you to find out what happened with the whole situation with ukraine. they say," note that word, "crowdstrike, i would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and i would like you to get to the bottom of it." okay? part of a conspiracy theory. and later in that call, this. "there's a lot of talk about biden's son, that biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. biden went out bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it.
it sounds horrible to me." william taylor testified today about deep concerns about the aid package, concerns that we already knew about because of these text messages that came to light earlier in the investigation. you know the ones, where taylor said, are we now saying that security assistance and white house meeting are conditioned on investigations? and sondland said, "call me." hmm. well, today we got the story of what happened next. when taylor called sondland about his fear that the white house was holding up aid to ukraine in exchange for politically motivated investigations of trump's opponents, okay? this is a quote. "during that phone call, ambassador sondland told me that president trump had told him that he wants president zelensky to state publicly that ukraine will investigate burisma and alleged ukrainian interference
in the 2016 u.s. election. ambassador sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the ukrainian official to whom he spoke at a white house meeting with president zelensky was dependent on a public announcement of investigations. in fact, ambassador sondland said, everything was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. he said that president trump wanted president zelensky in a public box by making a public statement about ordering such investigations." that couldn't be more clear. i mean, it is pretty crystal, don't you think? and let's be clear about this. the quid was military aid and the white house meeting.
the pro quo, investigations. and it was the president who orchestrated the entire thing. more testimony. this is bill taylor describing how he learned the aid the ukrainians were waiting for wasn't coming and who was holding it up. so listen to this. he said, "toward the end of an otherwise normal meeting, a voice on the call, the person was offscreen, said that she was from omb and that her boss had instructed her not to approve any additional spending on security assistance for ukraine until further notice. i and others sat in astonishment. the ukrainians were fighting the russians and counted on not only the training and weapons but also the assurance of u.s. support. all that omb staff person said was that the directive had come from the president to the chief of staff to omb."
the directive had come from the president to the chief of staff. that's mick mulvaney, who comes up again in bill taylor's testimony, by name this time. he recounts a conversation with former russia adviser fiona hill and national security council official alexander vennman. "dr. hill and mr. vennman tried to assure, reassure me that they were not aware of any official change in u.s. policy toward ukraine, omb's announcement notwithstanding. they did confirm that the hold on security assistance for ukraine came from chief of staff mick mulvaney and that the chief of staff maintained a skeptical view of ukraine." let's remember, it was mick mulvaney who in a disastrous press conference last week admitted the quid pro quo. later claiming that he didn't
say what he said. even though it was right there on tape. >> did he also mention to me in the past that the corruption related to the dnc server? absolutely, no question about that. but that's it. that's why we held up the money. >> to be clear, what you just described is a quid pro quo, it is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happened as well. >> we do that all the time with foreign policy. i have news for everybody. get over it. there's going to be political influence in foreign policy. >> like i said, this is the whole ball game. bill taylor's testimony puts everything in context. it lays out the quid, the pro, and the quo. and quid pro quo is not some magic phrase that the president needs to be caught on audiotape saying in order for that to be what happened, because even if he were, he
would still deny it. but no one reading this testimony can deny its impact. and they try. but you can't. please read it for yourself. it's about ten pages long or so. please read it. you may want to deny it if you're politically motivated. you may want to deny it but you can't really deny it. it's pretty explicit. the president's allies are telling him to accept the fact that he will almost surely be impeached by the house of representatives. what does this president do when he is feeling threatened, when he is feeling all poor, woe is me, the world is against me? he tries to distract and divide us. and he's doing it again now. regardless of how many times that we have seen it, there's no excuse for the president of the united states tweeting, and i'm quoting here, "all republicans
must remember what we are witnessing here -- a lynching." a lynching? comparing impeachment, which is an investigation and a trial by congress provided for in our constitution, to the brutal murders of almost 5,000 americans? three-quarters of them black. that's according to the naacp, by the way. now, others have used that word in the same way. but they were wrong. just like this president is wrong. thousands of african-americans. they didn't call them african-americans back then.
you know what they called them, right? thousands of people who looked like me were murdered, simply for who they were. this president uses that word as if it all means something that he thinks is unfair to him. that's not what lynching means. let me tell you what it means. it means being -- if you can even describe how horrific it is, it means being ripped from your home and family, taken away by a mob, tortured, hanged from a tree, left there for everybody to see. a brazen public murder meant to send a message that they can do anything they want, anything they wanted to black folks, and
southern breeze ♪ ♪ strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees ♪ >> that is what lynching means. and nobody, nobody, especially this man in the white house, should be playing politics with that. bombshell news tonight. frank bruni is here, laura coates, harry litman, they'll break down all of this, what it means in the big picture of the impeachment investigation. that's next. i've been plotting to destroy you. sizing you up... calculating your every move. you think this is love? this is a billion years of tiger dna just ready to pounce.
and if you have the wrong home insurance coverage, you could be coughing up the cash for this. so get allstate and be better protected from mayhem, like me-ow. asbut when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls... you can never seem to get anywhere. that's why dell technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. ♪ a revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. so you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward.
they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! anna, do you yes! those plans? i just wanted to show you something i've been wor... ♪ james r. and associates. anna speaking... ♪ james r. and associates. anna. ♪
u.s. diplomat in ukraine, bill taylor, says he was told president trump wanted military aid to the country be withheld until investigations were launched that would improve president trump's reelection chances. joining me is frank bruni, laura coates, and harry litman. this is bombshell testimony, explosive testimony from this top diplomat. frank, i'll start with you. bill taylor. i just want to read a little more from him. i read a loot in the opening but i want to read some. "ambassador sondland tried to explain to me that president trump is a businessman. when a businessman is about to sign a check to someone who owes him something, he said, the businessman asks that person to put up before signing the check." "pay up," excuse me, "before signing the check. ambassador volker used the same terms several days later." pay up before signing the check? that is the definition of -- >> quid pro quo, absolutely. it's amazing testimony. what you just read, he names who he's talking to. he says what they said.
i mean, the specificity of this testimony is extraordinary. the sweep of this testimony is extraordinary. it all blows you away. and also, something we haven't noted enough, the tone of it is extraordinary. he's already being smeared by the white house as some radical bureaucrat. but he goes through his biography, he's a west point grad, he's been a civil servant for 50 years. he wasn't sure he wanted to go back to ukraine. but one of his mentors, a republican, said no, if you can serve your country you go. >> if your country asks you to serve i think he said -- >> this is an earnest, earnest man, like some of the generals who come out against trump. and he's not trying to stage a coup or ignore the constitution, as this ridiculous statement of the white house press secretary was alleging. this is someone who's watching something happen in his country by his country's leader that he can't abide. and he's pained by it and that pain and that earnestness comes through in every sentence of this testimony, which as you said i wish everyone in america would read. >> i read it twice because i wanted to get, as they say, the
full effect. it is the full force of this. it is unbelievable. i know you guys have read it. harry, to you next, and then laura. remember those text messages, harry, between trump's million-dollar donor, ambassador sondland, and taylor? here is what taylor writes. he says, "are we now saying that security assistance and white house meeting are conditioned on investigations?" and sondland responds "call me." here's what he says happened when they did have the call. he says "during that phone call ambassador sondland told me president trump had told him that he wants president zelensky to state publicly that ukraine will investigate burisma and alleged ukrainian interference in the 2016 u.s. election. he wanted a public announcement. there it is. right? no? >> yes. first of all, a subtext here. sondland, volker, maybe others are now in hot water. and it's going to be a favorable dynamic for congress because they're going to have to try to
exculpate themselves. but it's as you say, if you believe taylor, and why wouldn't you, as frank says, an honest, earnest guy with no motive to lie, it's game over. for a prosecutor the question is do you put him up first or do you put him up last. it's overwhelming testimony. here's one piece you haven't read. trump said no quid pro quo but he did insist that zelensky go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of biden and 2016 election interference and zelensky should want to do this himself. you don't need to know latin to know that's a quid pro quo and exactly what they were talking about. the facts of the matter will now be 100% clear and it will fall to republicans to somehow make some defense and saying it's not no quid pro quo, a, it's nonsense, but b, i don't see any purchase there. >> all right. let's bring in laura. we need you to put your stamp on
this, laura, because we've all seen the call transcript, the text messages, we heard from giuliani, we heard from the president and mulvaney. did taylor's testimony put together all of those pieces into a very damning story for the president? >> it's an extraordinarily long receipt, don lemon, a receipt that lists names, that gives dates, that talks about a memorandum that was contemporaneously written to memorialize what was heard. it talks about his evolution of his skepticism from thinking, well, perhaps these two different channels, the formal communication channel that i'm accustomed to in a diplomatic situation versus the informal channels used and exploited by giuliani and the likes, perhaps this was all leading up to conditioning the receipt of military aid on a white house visit. no, it's even more than that. he goes through and talks about the burisma and how everything is conditioned on it and that he
wants to have suddenly the perfect sound bite and put the president of ukraine in a box to be able presumably to be used time and time again in a subsequent campaign. he talks about how frankly he undermines president zelensky's statement that he made just a few weeks ago in new york city when he said oh, i didn't feel as though i was compromised in some way or that i was manipulated by the president. well, he outlines in his actual letter that says zelensky had no interest in being the pawn in a political game like this. he was well aware of the conditioning. what this is is extraordinarily and objectively damning. the only question now is whether or not it is subjectively impeachable to them. it's always been their prerogative to decide what that is. but you're talking about whether or not there was a conditioning of military aid. and i want to repeat to everyone, don, we're talking about not a slush fund or a private checking account of the president of the united states or even citizen donald trump. these are taxpayer dollars.
each of us has now contributed. by providing it we provided money for the president to be able to condition military aid. and i love the fact that this particular person, mr. taylor, pointed out the very thing that gets lost in all of this. while all this game is being played, thousands of people's lives were at risk and were dying while this game went on. >> yeah. everyone, stay with me. much more to talk about. we've got a lot more on this bombshell testimony. the top u.s. diplomat in ukraine giving details about what ukraine's president was told to say to president trump and how he felt about possibly being used as a pawn in trump's re-election campaign. super emma just about sleeps in her cape. but when we realized she was battling sensitive skin, we switched to tide pods free & gentle. it's gentle on her skin, and dermatologist recommended.
tide free & gentle. safe for skin with psoriasis and eczema. of millions of americans during the recession. so, my wife kat and i took action. we started a non-profit community bank with a simple theory - give people a fair deal and real economic power. invest in the community, in businesses owned by women and people of color, in affordable housing. the difference between words and actions matters. that's a lesson politicians in washington could
use right now. i'm tom steyer, and i approve this message. billions of problems. dry mouth? parched mouth? cotton mouth? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath oral rinse and lozenges. help relieve dry mouth using natural enzymes to soothe and moisturize. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart. i get it all the time. "have you lost weight?" of course i have- ever since i started renting from national. because national lets me lose the wait at the counter... ...and choose any car in the aisle. and i don't wait when i return, thanks to drop & go. at national, i can lose the wait...and keep it off. looking good, patrick. i know. (vo) go national. go like a pro.
we're back now with frank, laura, and harry. so frank, let's talk about -- we're getting a sense of what was going on in the background leading up to that now infamous trump-zelensky call. here he is describing the conversation he had a few days before the call, okay? he said, "later on july 20 i had a phone conversation with ambassador sondland while he was on a train from paris to london. ambassador sondland told me that he had recommended to president zelensky that he use the phrase "i will leave no stone unturned" with regard to investigations when president zelensky spoke with president trump. also on july 20 i had a phone conversation with mr. danyliuk during which he conveyed to me that president zelensky did not want to be used as a pawn in a u.s. reelection campaign. the next day i texted both ambassadors volker and sondland about president zelensky's concern.
this illustrates the degree to which they were feeding zelensky the language to use with trump to try to butter him up. but he didn't want to do it. >> right. no, no, no. and that's one of the really kind of fascinating things about this. he knows exactly what's going on and he does not want to be a u.s. pawn. this is also so important because we have focused so much on that july 25 phone call because we have that transcript of it and the transcript is so damning. but this is an ongoing, sustained, intricate operation to get the ukrainian president to do what president trump wants. this doesn't just happen in one phone call. there are many people deployed to do this. it goes on over weeks and months. and one of the things that makes this testimony so credible is as he goes through the timeline he says very candidly at this point i wasn't sure what i was seeing, at this point i still wasn't sure what i was seeing. but he's like at this point what i was seeing was so crystal clear i could not avoid acknowledging or live with it. he threatens to resign several times. >> he says it was starting to become clear there were two channels, there was the official channel and a back channel. >> meaning the giuliani channel,
the channel of craziness. >> okay, laura, can we talk about all the people being pulled into this? let's go back to the testimony. okay? "ambassador bolton recommended that i send a first person cable to secretary pompeo directly, relaying my concerns. i wrote and transmitted such a cable on august 29, describing the folly i saw in withholding military aid to ukraine a time when hostilities were still active in the east and when russia was watching closely to gauge the level of american support for the ukrainian government." and according to taylor he heard that pompeo took the cable to a meeting at the white house it certainly appears like pompeo was very much in the know about this quid pro quo. >> mm-hmm. >> well, we also must know at this point why it is he had to be subpoenaed because he wasn't offered up by the state department to provide all of this information at this point in time. we now can see why. you hear the name bolton.
you hear the name pompeo. you hear about sondland and volker and other people involved. you hear about yovanovitch and a whole host oof people including rudy giuliani. what this says is a couple of those people have already testified here, don so, if they are listening or reading this particular letter at 15-plus pages, guess what, they're wondering if they gave exactly the same story in the detailed sense with the gravitas and credibility that mr. taylor has now expressed and i bet they're biting their nails about whether they'll have to be called back, number one. number two, it's about who has not yet testified, which leads me to believe that that original timeline that the house had for before thanksgiving to say okay, you can probably wrap all up this, we have the obvious, it's about the quid pro quo. well, now you want to hear from people like bolton or pompeo who are going to be much harder to get into the chair to talk about these issues. so it adds a bit of delay but perhaps a necessary one to get the full picture. of course all this is essentially the american people saying well, what more would you need to have this particular evidence in play?
well, remember, impeachment in terms of the process is the first part. the indictmentesque aspect of it. the second part is giving it to the senate for trial. and the evidence has to be there c comprehensively. so part of this is them building the case even when it's obvious the person is holding the bag in their hands. >> wow. i didn't expect people -- hey, this is a quid pro quo. no one is ever going to say that. >> this is a meeting of the minds here, don. >> not even the most foolish person. haireye, i've got to ask you. just to clear things up. you don't need to explicitly use the phrase "quid pro quo" in order for there to be one. >> of course not. it's obvious. he doesn't need to use it in order for there to be an impeachable offense. he doesn't need to use it in order for there to be a crime. but it's telling that this is what they're depending on. there's an interesting exchange with sondland where he has -- where he hears from taylor and
then he sends this sanitized cya memo, oh, the president wants to be clear there's no cy -- there's no quid pro quo, which is preceded by a phone call we know between him and trump. they somehow think they can do all these things in plain sight and just sprinkle magic dust and say no quid pro quo and, you know, obviously it just won't work at all. >> thank you all, i appreciate it. gasps, groans during today's explosive closed-door testimony on capitol hill. congressman sean patrick maloney was in the room. he joins me next.
nyquil severe gives you powerful relief for your worst cold and flu symptoms, on sunday night and every night. nyquil severe. the nightime, sniffling, sneezing, coughing, aching, stuffy head, best sleep with a cold, medicine. dad! dad!! can you drive me to jessica's house? ♪ at northwestern mutual, this is what our version of financial planning looks like. tomorrow is important, but so is making the most of the house before they're out of the house. spend your life living. find an advisor at northwesternmutual.com. i can'twhat? ve it. that our new house is haunted by casper the friendly ghost?
hey jill! hey kurt! movies? i'll get snacks! no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on our car insurance with geico. i got snacks! ohhh, i got popcorn, i got caramel corn, i got kettle corn. am i chewing too loud? believe it! geico could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. when ywhat do you see?orld, we see patterns. relationships. when you use location technology, you can see where things happen, before they happen. with esri location technology, you can see what others can't. ♪
ukraine's president to launch investigations that might help his reelection effort. joining me is congressman patrick maloney who sits on the house intelligence committee and heard taylor's closed-door testimony today. congressman, thank you for joining us. >> good to be with you. >> here's what sources are telling cnn, that there were audible sighs and gasps during taylor's opening statement. i would like your take on what it was like, and on what you heard as well. >> right. well, i know you know i can't get into specifics, but sure, my takeaway and emotional reaction is consistent with that. it was gripping testimony. he's a key witness. guys like bill taylor who spend 50 years serving as an infantry officer in vietnam with the 101st airborne, serving as a foreign service officer in some really hardship posts, guys like that don't pull their punches. and he came and told the truth. it's going to be a big part of getting that truth to the american public. >> so taylor directly contradicted gordon sondland's
testimony. and this is what sondland -- this is sondland from last week. he says, "again, i recall no discussions with any state department or white house official about former vice president biden or his son. nor do i recall taking part in any effort to encourage an investigation into the bidens." but taylor described sondland relaying trump's insistence that president zelensky go to the microphone and say he is opening investigations of biden and the 2016 interference and that president zelensky should want to do this himself. given that discrepancy, will you again subpoena gordon sondland to clarify his testimony? >> yeah, that's above my pay grade, but listen, i think anybody who comes before congress and swears an oath should tell the truth and if they don't, they should be held accountable. and if they have some concerns about the veracity of their testimony, maybe they should come back in and clear it up, because the evidence we are going to put together is going to round out the real facts
about what this president did, who helped him, why they did it. and it's because of guys like bill taylor who came in and told the truth. >> here is taylor talking about a july 19th phone call where he was briefed on an earlier meeting between ukrainian and white house officials. "specifically they told me that ambassador sondland had connected investigations with an oval office meeting for president zelensky which so irritated ambassador bolton that he abruptly ended the meeting telling dr. hill and mr. vindman that they should have nothing to do with domestic politics. he also directed dr. hill to brief the lawyers. dr. hill said ambassador bolton referred to this as a drug deal after the july 10 meeting." does your committee need to hear from john bolton on this? >> you know, ambassador bolton obviously has important information. and i think it's important that we hear from everybody who has important facts and evidence so that the american public can get the truth. can i make one point? >> sure. >> the guys with a lot of the evidence right now are sitting down at the state department,
who are refusing to produce documents. and we know ambassador taylor and others provided those documents to the state department in response to a subpoena. their documents are supposed to go to their employer who is supposed to produce them. instead the state department and others are stonewalling those requests. why are they afraid of the facts? we should get all the facts. so that's a good place to start. >> congressman, this morning representative mark meadows came out and said no quid pro quo. but by this evening he was telling cnn, "we have yet to find a firsthand person to tell us the president or the secretary or anybody that conditioned this stuff koechlt." are they moving the goal posts here? >> yeah, that comment isn't wearing very well, let me put it that way. i think what these guys on the republican side told themselves is they could erect this phony standard that if there wasn't an explicit quid pro quo then there's nothing to see here. which of course has always been ridiculous.
it is wrong, unpatriotic, almost certainly illegal, just to seek a thing of value from a foreign government to help you in an american election. but let's play in the ballpark for a moment. let's play the "there has to be a quid pro quo" game. look at the evidence being accumulated that there was absolutely a concern by this president to condition american military assistance in a white house meeting on getting an investigation into the bidens and of the democrats and the dnc. i don't know what else you call that but a quid pro quo. it's not necessary. it's not the only impeachable offense floating around out there. but it sure looks like there was just that at work here. and it is -- it is -- it is depressing to believe that any american president would trade away the strategic interests of an ally and a critical partner like ukraine, our national security, would put his own shabby political interests ahead of the country's interests, ahead of our national security. but that's what the evidence is showing.
when you trade one thing for another, that's called a quid pro quo. >> congressman, appreciate your time. thanks so much. >> my pleasure. putin and erdogan making a deal today over syria. now they're calling the shots on nato's southern border. did president trump play right into their hands? the former director of national intelligence, james clapper, will weigh in on that and today's bombshell testimony, next. diarrhea?! new pepto diarrhea to the rescue! its three times concentrated liquid formula coats and kills bacteria to relieve diarrhea. the leading competitor only treats symptoms. it does nothing to kill the bacteria. treat diarrhea at its source with new pepto diarrhea. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that.
now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? i am royalty of racing, i am alfa romeo. my body is truly powerful. i have the power to lower my blood sugar and a1c. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain.
serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, belly pain and decreased appetite, which lead to dehydration and may worsen kidney problems. i have it within me to lower my a1c. ask your doctor about trulicity. they use stamps.com all the services of the post office only cheaper get a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale
go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again. billions of problems. morning breath? garlic breath? stinky breath? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath fresh breath oral rinse instantly fights all types of bad breath and works for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy. there's therabreath at walmart.
former director of national intelligence. always a pleasure. taylor testified he went to the front lines of ukraine battle with russia. knowing u.s. aide was being with held. ambassador volker and i could see the russian led forces on the other side of the damaged bridge. other 13,000 ukrainians had been killed in the war. one or two a week. more ukrainians would die without the u.s. assistance. so lives were on the line. the president was willing to over look that for political investigation that would personally benefit him? >> it was incredible. when i read that passage, i found it heart rending. and good on the ambassador. or charge i guess technically here. for going to the front lines and the line of demarcation that exists with the region. in eastern ukraine.
and when you read that, it's just dreadful to think that the aid that is required for that ukrainian people to defend themselves against the russians being held up for purely political individual personal political agenda here in the united states. it just really egregious. >> "washington post" reporting that putin and hungary prime minister orban helped sour trump on ukraine. take a look. this is a timeline. may 3 trump and russian president putin speak on the phone. trump wants his opinion on ukrainian president zelensky. may 13 he meets with hungarian prime minister. he solidified the pessimistic view of ukraine. may 23, "new york times" reports trump called the ukrainian terrible people in a meeting with his top adviser.
june 28. trump again meets with putin this time at the g 20 in japan. july 25, trump's infamous call with president zelensky. where he pressures ukraine to investigate the bidens and july 31, trump speaks to putin again. the post makes clear that neither putin or orban said anything about the bidens or ukraine's role in 2016. but does it look like they were running an influence campaign on president trump? that's the question. >> of course. this is especially plays into putin's hands. so of all people that are our president could consult with about another country and asks putin. and again this is all part of the, you know, strange relationship between our president and putin. >> let me play this. you bring up a good point. this is house speaker nancy
pelosi calling trumps calling out the relationship with putin. >> the fact we would be here in an inquiry that relates to the president. asking a foreign government to help the president in his reelection. and under mines the national security. we were sending that military assistance and because of ukraine needing that. russia. all roads seemed to lead to putin with the president. >> is she right? >> we, yes, she is. i never have understood this strange deference to putin. that our president displays. and obviously has influence on him. and all the people to get asked, particularly in his own country and state department. there are all kind of experts and expertise on anywhere.
especially ukraine. what does he do -- he goes. he was looking for a narrative he wanted to hear in both cases. i'll talk to autocrats to get the more appealing narrative. and that's what was going on. >> today we learned about a deal between putin and turkish president. they agreed to allow russian troops to patrol the border between syria and turkey. the president reacted on twitter saying good news seems to be happening with respect to turkey, syria and the middle east. is there actually anything in this new agreement or situation that is good news for america? >> well, this is orr wellen. this crisis is good news. up is down black is white. it's bad news. it's good news for everybody except the united states and the kurds. and everybody else is a winner.
putin has got to be just kicking his heels here. at his good fortune. and our president playing right into his hands. gloating over taking over our bases and of course chipping away at the southern flank of nato. where putin is. which always is appealing to him. it's just an ingratiating himself with turkeys president erdogan. this is bad. >> ten hours of bombshell testimony on capitol hill. the president allies are telling him just accept the fact that he is going to be impeached. stay with us. when i showed my mom the dna results,
it made her feel proud. they saw us, they recognized us. ancestry® specifically showed the regions that my family was from. the state of jalisco. the city of guadalajara. the results were a reflection of our family and the results were really human. i feel proud about my identity. greater details. richer stories. and now with health insights. get your dna kit at ancestry.com. here's the thing about managing for your business.s when you've got public clouds, and private clouds, and hybrid clouds- things can get a bit cloudy for you. but now, there's the dell technologies cloud,
this is "cnn tonight" i'm don lemon. there is a lot going on tonight and we're going to dig deep into four big stories in the hour ahead. explosive testimony from the top u.s. diplomat in ukraine. as the president on the ropes in the impeachment inquiry. what bill taylor says about the campaign to pressure ukraine into investigating the bidens and how it plays into the president's problems. it's no surprise the president is doing what he always does. trying to distract and divide. this time disgracefully comparing the impeachment process to lynching.