tv Fareed Zakaria GPS CNN October 16, 2011 1:00pm-2:00pm EDT
another first for martin luther king, the first nonwar hero, the first nonpresident to have a memorial and a huge memorial it is built on the washington mall area. thank you so much. our thanks to joe johns and athena jones. thank you for watching our special coverage of the martin luther king jr. memorial dedication. up next, "fareed zakaria: gps." this is "gps," the "global public square." welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. we've got a great show. first up, paul krugman and steve forbes to talk about occupy wall street, democrats and republicans, and other topics on which they will disagree. then, how your cell phone could solve the food crisis. i'll explain. next, one of the most powerful men if one of the most
complex countries. the former head of saudi intelligence, prince turkey al faisal, talks about the osama bin laden he knew and much more. finally, how this man became this man. the most wanted man in the world. an unbelievable story. first, here's "my take." i was in germany this week, and the mood there is pretty grim. europe is facing its most severe challenge since 1945. if the greek crisis morphs into an italian crisis, italy being too large to bail out, the entire structure of post-world war ii europe could unravel. finally european leaders seem to recognize that their strategy of kicking the can down the road has not worked, and they will come up with some package. the result will not be a dramatic solution, that is not how europe works, but a series of steps that together will be more comprehensive than anything done before. but they will not address europe's core problem which is a lack of growth.
the europeans, by which i mean the germans, are trying to find some solution to the crisis that will not let countries like greece and italy off the hook. germans feel these countries need to feel the pressure. only then will they reform their budgets and their habits. so the solutions will be complex, trying to stop a crisis while not bailing out these countries entirely. the real problem, however, is not so much that greece has been unwilling to make sacrifices. it has made many. but greece's budget numbers look bleak because its growth forecast looks bleak. it needs to address a much larger question of competitiveness. what can the greek economy do to attract capital and investment and at what wage levels? these are the questions most european countries will need to answer to fully solve their problems. italy's economy has not grown for an entire decade. no debt deal will work if italy stays stagnant for another decade. even germany is not immune.
it has an average growth rate of about 1.5%, and german officials know that with a declining population in five to seven years, the country could grow at an annual rate of just 1%. that's not much of an engine for europe. europe needs a crisis agenda to get out of its bind. but beyond that, it needs a growth agenda which might in the short term require investments. but in the long run, requires radical reform. the fact is that western economies with high wages, generous middle-class subsidies, complex regulations and taxes, have become sclerotic. now they face pressure from the demography, an aging population, technology, which has allowed companies to do much more with fewer people, and globalization, which has allowed manufacturing and services to locate across the world. if europe and for that matter the united states cannot adjust to this new landscape, it might escape this storm only to enter another. let's get started.
occupy wall street and the tea party come from diametrically different parts of the spectrum, but they both stem from american pop youism. what are these movement ls about? what will come of them? i've got a great panel to talk about that and much, much more. steve forbes is chairman and editor-in-chief of forbes media and ran for president in 1996 and 2000. nobel prize-winning economist paul krugman is a columnist for "the new york times." bret stevens is the deputy editorial page editor for the "wall street journal." and krista freeland is global editor at large at reuters. paul, you have been counseling us to take these guys seriously, not just in terms of the political power but actually in terms of a coherent message. >> yeah. we had -- we are just three
years after the greatest banking crisis since the 1930s. i mean, it was brought on by excesses on the part of the financial industry and the financial industry was bailed out at the public's expense and risk. and yet we're still in an economic crisis. and somehow all of that, the discussion of who are these guys, why are we supporting them, why haven't they paid more for this, what are the reforms that are going to stop this from happen, all of that disappeared from the debate. we've been arguing about who's going to cut social security and what about the budget deficit. we lost the whole thread of the core issue at -- in our society right now. and these protesters, who are a mix of all sorts of people, suddenly brought that back into the center of our national debate. and just for that, that's an enormously positive contribution. >> do you think that the crisis was caused by the irresponsibility of the private sector? >> i think the crisis is where i wish the protesters would go against the fed instead of wall street. if the federal reserve hadn't
been on such an easy-money path in the early part of the last decade and dragged the central banks with it, you would not have had a housing boom and bust. the juice would not have been there for it. so you get monetary policy right, and a lot of the excesses you see as a result of that would have gone away, whether it's artificial winners like wall street and commodities or artificial losers in other sectors of the economy. it's destructive when you deliberately weaken a currency. >> what do you say to that? that government regulation, principally the fed's decision for easy money, was the root cause? >> you have a hard time -- there are so many levels in that. you know, first of all, i think that this is a really kind of desperate effort to change the subject, right? we know about the bankers. we know about how much money we need. we know about the packaging of seemingly -- of what were in fact bad loans as aaa assets which suddenly turns to toxic waste. now you're saying it was alan greenspan doing it. well, i'm no fan of greenspan's, but a financial system that depends on always having the perfect leadership at the central bank is a financial
system that is doomed to failure. monetary policy is always less than optimal. what we had was a financial system that, thanks to deregulation, thanks to financial developments that had bypassed the existing regulations, was far more fragile and prone to abuse. those are the abuses that we have to have a reckoning about. >> the crisis has to do with the political allocation of capital thanks to fannie mae and freddie mac and various government interventions on behalf of various kinds of not only lenders but borrowers. but i want to just push back on another point. before you sort of make -- assert the premise that this is a populist movement that's taking place on wall street, i lived down there. i don't know if any of you have actually gone to zuccotti park and chatted with some of these guys. this is not populism. this is maybe anarchism or something maybe entirely different. what you don't find is a
populist movement. you find sort of 9/11 truthers, you find people -- by the way, "take down the fed" is one of the slogans of some of these people. and i wonder -- i wonder about the wisdom of the democratic party or its partisans tying their carriage to this particular movement because it doesn't strike me as representing anyone except the same kind of extreme fringe that you find at, you know, ramsey clark marches. >> you were there, as well? >> yeah. i've been there. it's not that hard. it's not brave reporting to take the subway down. but i would totally disagree with bret. i do think that the occupy wall street movement, like the tea party, is a genuine grassroots expression of people being really angry. people being angry about the fact that median wages are stagnating in the united states. and they don't see economic growth. people are worried about their jobs, they are losing their houses, and, you know, i think there is no consensus whatsoever on the political solution, but
this -- this is real anger. >> so far they haven't had the volume the tea party's had, and what they like about the tea parties is they went to what they considered the real source of the problem which was washington, d.c. just to get one last thing on the fed, it is the most boring subject in the world and i don't want to erode your ratings. but the bottom line is you could not have had a housing boom of this scale you had if you hadn't had that easy money. we saw this in the 1970s. again, you know, excess oil profits and the like. huge, spectacular bursts afterwards. again, the fed has got to get it right. i think fred is right. if you didn't have fannie and freddie, $1.5 trillion of junk paper, it could haven't reached the level it. let's start with the root causes and take it from there. >> this is why people like me welcome this so much, because there's been this concerted effort to hijack a massive case of private sector failure. a massive case of the failure of deregulation and turn it into an anti-government case which is
what you guys are doing. and it's all wrong. i mean, that's another program. we'd have to go through this. but the point of view that says, hey, wait, let's go after the actual bad guys who are not in washington. no, barney frank somehow as a member of a minority party under the iron thumb of tom delay did not somehow cause this financial crisis. to say, look, the bankers are the ones who profited and left the rest of us in a ditch. that's a very good thing to have people saying that. >> isn't it the end actually that the bankers were able to do that because the rules of the game were wrong? it's not that the guys who work on wall street are evil individuals. they're not more evil than the guys who work on bay street in toronto. it's just that the rules were such that, you know, i would say particularly on leverage and on capital requirement that encouraged bad behavior. and the financial sector had an incentive to do things which ended up toppling the economy. >> let me ask steve this question because it -- you know, you're an old-fashioned executive in a sense, not a financial executive. and surely you must look at what the financial executives were paid and the massive increases in pay that -- that seemed
disproportionate. if you look at average financial executives compared with the average executive pay, it used to be 2-1. it became 6-1 by the time of the crisis. >> sure. >> and when you can look at that and say, you know, what were they producing for the real economy? these weren't technology ceos -- >> again, when you undermine a currency, you do get these artificial winners. you saw it in the '70s. oil companies did extremely well and a handful of others did extremely well. you had a land boom in the farmland. it was pointed out well after world war i when austria was hit by great inflation, on every street corner there rose a bank instead of a coffee house. when the inflation was conquered a couple years later, the banks went, the coffeehouses came back. if you have a stable currency, stable environment, those excesses can't take place. the juice is not there for it. >> the -- where there might be a real movement here is not, i don't think, with these guys downtown.
i think it's the problem of joblessness. you have youth unemployment that's 18%, you know, regular unemployment which refuses to come below 9%. i think the figure is five jobseekers for every available job. and that's a real problem. and you can do one of two things. you can march on jamie dimon's house or on jpmorgan, never mind that jpmorgan was one of the banks that didn't get itself into the mortgage mess, or you can have some serious discussion about what we have been doing over the last three years to create jobs. you know, just -- just now this week, we're signing a free trade agreement with south korea, panama, and colombia. the white house itself says that the korean side of the deal is going to create 70,000 jobs. why was this sitting there for three years when the treaty had already been -- the deal had already been negotiated under the previous administration? you have to look at washington and say, what are they doing to kill jobs and why aren't they creating? >> okay, we're going to take a break. we'll come back and discuss job creators and job killers. right back.
[ male announcer ] you can never have too much expertise. that's why northern trust offers a full team of experts who work to understand your goals and help you achieve them. as one of the nation's largest wealth managers, northern trust's goals-based investment strategies are tailored to your needs. ♪ and overseen by experts who seek to maximize opportunities while minimizing risk. ♪ expertise matters. find it at northern trust. there's no time like the present to consider all your health insurance options. does medicare alone meet your needs? would additional coverage be better for you? well, now is a good time to take a look at an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company.
get started by calling for your free information kit and guide to medicare. as you probably know, medicare only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. a medicare supplement insurance plan helps cover some of it. that could save you up to thousands of dollars a year in out-of-pocket costs. and you can visit any doctor who accepts medicare patients. with medicare supplement insurance, you'll find a range of plans to choose from to fit your needs and budget. there are no networks. no referrals to see a specialist. and you could get a pretty good idea what your out-of-pocket costs will be every month. plus, these plans travel with you anywhere in the u.s. don't let this time go by without considering if an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan is right for you. it's as easy as a phone call. rates are competitive. and these are the only medicare supplement insurance plans exclusively endorsed by aarp.
remember, medicare doesn't cover everything. medicare supplement insurance plans help pay for some of the rest. you could save up to thousands of dollars a year in out-of-pocket costs. and you can choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan could be an option to get the coverage you need at a competitive rate. so don't wait another minute. be sure to call today. call now for your free medicare guide and information kit about aarp medicare supplement insurance plans, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company.
we're back with our panel. paul, we were talking about creating or killing jobs. the argument is at that administration hasn't done enough in terms of trade policy and things. but you obviously fundamentally think the thing to do to create jobs is spend government money? >> yeah, and have more of what steve forbes hates, more expansion nary policy by the fed. right? >> it's worth mentioning, these numbers about south korea, free trade pact and all that. first of all, the numbers are disputable. the main thing is 70,000 jobs in the u.s. economy? you're talking about a rounding era. this is not where important stuff is going to come from. it has to come from a major increase in demand. the only ways we know is to increase government spending temporarily or possibly some more aggressive action by the fed, moving in exactly the opposite direction of the way that people like steve want it to go.
this is -- we are -- we are recapitulating the great depression now, making the same mistakes of pulling back on stimulus too soon. tightening money too soon, that were what made the great depression go on for so long. >> i think what we're recapitulating is the experience of japan. you talked about more stimulus. we had the greatest experiment in stimulus spending in a very long time in this country, about a trillion dollars worth of stimulus. rounds of quantitative easing by the federal reserve, and what -- you know, what are the results that we have to show for it? we have a -- a worse than a jobless recovery -- >> what would you regard as a success? i've never understood what that means. clearly it's mathematically true that by keeping schoolteachers in place and not firing them and not firing firefighters you preserve those jobs. do you mean that it didn't trigger a round of private sector hiring? is that the idea, that it didn't jumpstart the economy? that government spending did keep -- >> the whole notion that government by that way can jumpstart the economy is a false one. where did they get that trillion
dollars from? it does not come from heaven. it comes from borrowing, printing money, a form of taxation, or taxation itself. it removes resources from the private sector where it could be put to productive use and perpetuates a lot of things that should not be perpetuated. again, if you let the -- >> the private sector is saving right now because it has an debt overhang. >> it does because of the weak dollar, sending private capital overseas, uncertainty about the code. massive new regulations coming on health care and the financial sector. those are real headwinds. if president obama had done nothing, if he had done nothing when he took office, he'd be a genius today. >> this is, again, why we need an occupy wall street. i've said this many times, people like steve are recapitulating 80-year-old economic fallacies, hijacking this discussion on the eve of the greatest failure of those conservative policies that we can possibly imagine. somehow making the case that the problem was that we weren't conservative enough. but because of the way our
normal discussion is structured, because of who has access to megaphones, because of who ends up dominating debates in congress, the other side which said, wait, the problem is not that we're doing too much, the problem is that we're not doing enough, got practically squeezed out of the debate. thank god a ragtag group of protesters in zuccotti park and elsewhere, had us going, wait, what is the problem here? shouldn't we be doing more? >> when has massive government spending ever revived an economy in peacetime? >> why does a war make a difference? we do know that -- >> you said world war ii was revived by government spending? >> yes. >> when 12 million veterans were taken out of the work force and after the war we cut spending -- >> you really want to make this about something else. you want to have the argument. as i see it actually, there's been a sustained surge of economic research the past years in austerity. take the austerity, does it have an expansionary effect? the international monetary fund has done studies, it's been overwhelming.
the world works the way a keynesian analyst says it should. >> answer bret's question about japan. japan did have a massive round of infrastructure spending. >> they actually -- they dribbled it out. they dribbled it out in stages. if you look year by year, you discover that years when japan ramped up the spending, their economy started to grow. then they pulled back, and the economy sank again. the actual -- if you go through the actual history, sort of run the tape on japan, what you find is a strong confirmation that increases in government spending do lead to economic growth. and when they happen -- >> look, the basic problem also you have is even accepting the idea that stimulus money in theory could -- just for the sake of argument -- could revive the economy, how is that stimulus money spent? economists look at how why this failed and figured out this government doesn't have a good idea of where to spend the money. so you have cases like solyndra, political allocation of capital, where, gee, this seems like a good idea. solar power is the energy of the
future. this is the wave of the future, and you have a bust. you're looking at a series of successive failures in this huge investment in so-called green technologies which could have been predicted were going to be fearless. the real problem is you don't know where the jobs of the future are going to come from. you talked about school teachers and so on. on yes, we'll have schoolteachers in the future. but who's the next steve jobs of the economy -- >> stimulus spending, bret, though, stimulus spending isn't about betting on the next steve jobs. stimulus spending is about do you believe that you need to kick-start the economy in time of recession, especially after a financial crisis. >> and did the stimulus kick-start the economy? >> the question is -- you have to think about what would the case be had there been no stimulus. you can't say, okay, the economy isn't perfect so the stimulus failed. >> you have 850 billion of misallocated capital -- >> no, fareed was right. you would have had more people unemployed. and the jobs in the middle are the ones being hollowed out. and the place where we're seeing jobs created are at the very top, steve jobs, silicon valley, great to be a software engineer. and at the bottom.
not so bad to work in a kitchen, to be a gardener. what about the middle-class jobs that are really the backbone of the america that i think steve yearns for? >> in the 1980s you have the same criticism of the reagan boom. all the middle class is going to disappear. turns out during that period and subsequently we had 40 million new jobs created from top to bottom. whole new industries created. and bret is right. industries we couldn't imagine grow up. who could have imagined ipod 12 years ago? >> those jobs are in china, though. that's the problem. most of those jobs are not in america. >> we've got to go. i've got to ask two questions before we go. you have written a lot, studied a lot about currencies and were an early critic of the euro. the question is very simple. play it out -- is the most likely scenario that at the end of the day the germans will kicking and screaming write the checks, or is the euro in danger of collapse? >> well, the euro is in actual
danger of collapse. there is a story where the whole thing falls apart. it's not -- it used to be a remote story, now i can see how it would play. i think probably not. i think in the end the germans will look at the consequences of a failure of the euro, the political consequences more than anything else, and will find a way to hold it together. maybe hive off greece, but boy, i'm less certain than i was a year ago. >> we've had -- it was a pleasure to have you on. we haven't asked but your whole other set of expertise. you have twice done this incredible dance of running for the republican nomination. what is your advice to people trying to do it? go for the base, go for the center? >> well, you got to win the base to be able to run in the general election. and it's more fun to win than to lose. and for the candidates who are getting the star power now like herman cain and, to a lesser extent, mitt romney, be aware you're going to go through the
hazing process where for a while you'll be tested and everything you do is going to be criticized. how you hold up under that heat will determine how well you're going to do if and when you got the nomination. >> who are you going to vote for? >> i'm looking at the field now and will be making a decision soon now that we know who's in the field. i come from new jersey. our governor a few days ago made it clear he's not running. so i'm looking at the field. i'll have a decision soon. >> maybe we'll do it on this program. steve forbes, bret stevens, paul krugman, chrystia freeland, pleasure as always. we'll be right back. [ boy ] hey, i thought these were electric?
uh, it is, yeah, it's a chevy volt. so what are you doing at a gas station? well it still takes gas to go farther. but you're not getting gas. true. not this time. uh, don't have to gas up very often. so you have to go to the bathroom? no. yes you do. thought these were electric? yes, it's a uh, a chevy volt. so what are you doing at a gas station? [ woman announcing ]bsite there's an easier way. create your own small-business site... with intuit websites. choose a style, customize, publish and get found... from just $7.99 a month. get a 30-day free trial... at intuit.com. at liberty mutual, we know how much you count on your car and how much the people in your life count on you. that's why we offer accident forgiveness, man: good job. where your price won't increase due to your first accident.
we also offer a hassle-free lifetime repair guarantee, where the repairs made on your car are guaranteed for life or they're on us. these are just two of the valuable features you can expect from liberty mutual. plus, when you insure both your home and car with us, it could save you time and money. at liberty mutual, we help you move on with your life. so get the insurance responsible drivers like you deserve. looks really good. call us at... or visit your local liberty mutual office, where an agent can help you find the policy that's right for you. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy?
now for our "what in the world" segment. all over the world, from china to india to the middle east, people are worried about the price of food. poor countries paid 20% more for basic food products in 2010 than they did the previous year. [ chanting ] >> some say the arab spring was triggered by food inflation as rising costs were causing public discontent. even here in the u.s., your daily peanut butter and jelly sandwich is going to cost a lot more. peanut prices have doubled this year. the u.n.'s food and agriculture organization, or fao, measures the international prices of a basket of food staples -- wheat, rice, sugar, meats.
and its data showed that prices reached an all-time high this year. now, there's good news and bad news. here the bad news. i always prefer the bad news first. things are going to get worse. the fao published a report this week called "food insecurity in the world." it warns that high and volatile food prices are widely expected to continue in the future. there are many reasons. new entrants to the middle classes want more food and more meat. this month the world is expected to welcome a baby who will bring our population to seven billion on this planet. that number will rise to nine billion by 2050, and we'll need to produce 70% more food than we do right now just to meet that increased demand. meanwhile, the world has seen a surge in extreme weather from australia's droughts to russia's wildfires, which has an impact on food production. and these weather patterns are expected to continue. so what can we do?
well, the best way to get any prices down is through increased productivity. if we could transform food production, making more food at lower cost, that will keep prices down. the fao report has a number of policy suggestions. among them, improving market information systems and investing in agra research. by the way, that means getting over phobias about genetically modified foods. but here's the good news i promised. i came across another report this week that had real examples of how to implement these solutions. one answer might lie in the mobile phone. the consulting group accenture conducted a study with vodaphone. it found the use of phones among farmers could increase agriculture income by $130 billion across 26 of vodafone's markets by 2020. now, while 70% of people in developing worlds have mobile phones, only one in four have bank accounts.
mobile banking could improve those numbers for farmers, increasing access to financial services, to the marketplace, and streamlining what is currently a very inefficient supply chain. if farmers know what prices for their goods are in real time, they can bargain better and take out the middlemen who jack up prices and hoard food. more than one billion people around the world are employed in agriculture. of these, 60% are small-scale workers. these farmers are often isolated, have limited transport or access to basic financial services. a mobile phone could go a long way toward changing their predicament and increasing their output. it's just the beginning. we talk a lot about the need to spur innovation on this show. in technology, in advanced manufacturing. this is just as true in agriculture. grain yields increased by 120% from 1950 to 1980. but only 47% since then.
information technology is just one part of the solution, but it is a powerful tool, and you don't need the new iphone with all that voice-recognition technology. any old mobile phone will do. and we will be right back. so you think we've basically won the war on terror? >> i think so. well somewhere along the way, emily went right on living. but you see, with the help of her raymond james financial advisor, she had planned for every eventuality. ...which meant she continued to have the means to live on... ...even at the ripe old age of 187. life well planned. see what a raymond james advisor can do for you.
no wonder snapshot's catching on. plug into the savings you deserve, with snapshot from progressive. ♪ [ male announcer ] with 50 horsepower, dual overhead cams and fierce acceleration, the gator xuv 825i will shatter your expectations. ♪ and so no one gets left behind, check out our all-new, affordable xuv 550s at johndeere.com/gator. i'm fredricka whitfield with a check of our top stories right now.
48 years after his "i have a dream" speech the reverend martin luther king jr. gets a place of honor on the national mall. president obama was the keynote speaker at the dedication of the king memorial. >> let us not be trapped by what it is. we can't be discouraged by what is. we've got to keep pushing for what ought to be, the america we ought to leave to our children, mindful that the hardships we face are nothing compared to those dr. king and his fellow marchers faced 50 years ago. next hour, king's children tell me what they think about their father's memorial. back with more news at the top of the hour. back to more of "fareed zakaria: gps." the reports this week of an assassination plot against the saudi ambassador in washington
read like a piece of spy fiction. the reality is that the plot is likely to strengthen the u.s.-saudi alliance, of course, which has always been an odd relationship. two very different countries thrown together for practical reasons. you'll get a sense of that when you hear my next guest, the former head of saudi intelligence for 24 years. in that capacity, prince turki al faisal helped run the mujaheddin war against the soviet occupation, working closely with the cia and the pakistani government and meeting with osama bin laden. one of the most powerful people in saudi arabia, the prince's father and grandfather were both kings, and he is a former ambassador to the united states and the united kingdom. he sat down with me recently. prince, thank you for joining us. >> thank you, mr. zakaria. >> as the head of saudi intelligence, you dealt with osama bin laden. what was he like as a person to deal with? >> when i met him, it was in the '80s.
at that time, he seemed to be a very -- very soft spoken, very self-effacing individual. his physique, of course, was imposing. over 6'3" and broad shoulders and so on. so -- >> but not charismatic in a way -- >> well, he never appeared to have any charismatic ambitions, you know. he -- he preferred to keep himself low key at that time. and he provided help to the mujaheddin by bringing money from not just the kingdom but from other places, as i say, medicines and et cetera. and this happened during the 1980s until the soviets withdrew. when the soviets withdrew, of course, the whole operation, if you like, or objective of people
like osama bin laden was challenged. what else to do? and i think it was at that time that bin laden began to turn from the soft-spoken, self-effacing individual into someone who developed ambitions of becoming more prominent, if you like, as a leader of a group that could help muslims anywhere in the world. >> did it surprise you that he was found in pakistan? >> i always thought that he would be somewhere between the two countries, either afghanistan or pakistan. of course, when the americans brought down the taliban and chased bin laden in tora bora, if you remember, for several months he must have made calculations that afghanistan was not as friendly as it used to be before that. >> you must have also seen the close, very close connection in those days between the pakistani military, the isi, your
counterpart in a sense, to pakistan's intelligence, and the taliban and what ended up turning into the taliban. so, i mean, when i look at the situation now, it seems to me the isi's ties to certain elements, certain militants, taliban elements, goes back a long way, does it not? >> it does. and i don't think the pakistanis have tried to hide that. i remember visiting islamabad in 1995. king fahad had authorized me to take a peace proposal to the mujaheddin and the afghan government. unfortunately, that peace proposal didn't go far. and i remember sitting with -- i don't know if he's still alive or not -- with minister of the interior of the first benazir government, the benazir bhutto government. a general bubba.
a gruff person, huge body and very loud voice, et cetera. and he was telling me, i want you to see my boys. we have -- the taliban have just begun operating in afghanistan, to help overcome some of the civil war that was going there. and it was clear that the general bubba thought of them as his boys. and so -- and it continued from there. and as you remember in 1998, i was sent to afghanistan to convince the taliban at that time to give up bin laden and to hand him over to us. i went twice, met with him the first time and the second time. unfortunately, for other reasons, mullah omar at first agreed but then subsequently completely dismissed the issue as being unacceptable. >> what do you think -- mullah omar is supposed to be still effectively running the taliban and running the opposition -- people don't know for sure.
but how did he strike you? did he strike you as a smart, strategic leader, as a military leader? >> from the two times i met him, he -- he seemed to be definitely the leader of the taliban around him, a man who had -- who could show that he fought the russians personally because he was lame in one leg and one of his eyes had been blown out in some military action that he had taken before. and he obviously exuded control over the taliban at that time. my view is that today the taliban have branched out. there are other sects and ethnicities fighting the presence of military troops there. and i think that will grow as long as there are foreigners there. >> you would say draw down? >> i would say withdraw, not just draw down. and i've said it publicly before.
taking advantage of killing bin laden i think and declaring victory should have been done by the united states. and a decision to withdraw with a timetable, a fixed timetable, not like it is now. not to withdraw economically or politically or whatever, but simply withdraw the troops. and i think that would remove a lot of the -- of the ways and means by which recruiting people to the fight against the americans and nato in afghanistan would happen. >> you think we basically won the war on terror? >> i think so. i think by killing bin laden and not just bin laden -- there are other al qaeda leaders that have been gotten rid of in afghanistan. in the kingdom, for example, the al qaeda cells that had been planted by bin laden have practically all been destroyed.
so al qaeda is losing out everywhere. >> so we've won the war on terror. how are we doing in the war for hearts and minds in the arab world? that's what i'll ask the prince of saudi arabia when we come back. et you up with that little hardware store we didn't intend for your face to be everywhere. but fedex office makes it so easy. not only do they ship stuff, they print flyers, brochures -- everything i need to get my name out there. that's the problem. now we need to give you a third identity. you're paul matheson. and you're gonna run your business into the ground. erik gustafson would never do that! there is no erik gustafson. hey that's erik gustafson!!! there is no erik gustafson!!!!! [ male announcer ] small business solutions. fedex. solutions that matter.
and now more of my conversation with prince turki al faisal, grandson of the king of saudi arabia, longtime director of tlgs, former ambassador to the united states. he talks about the uneasy relationship between his country and ours and america's standing in the arab world. americans arstill fascinated, scared by saudi arabia. and they look at it, and they just wonder, is this still a place that is a breeding ground for a certain kind of islam, a certain kind of attitude toward modernity that is fundamentally anti-american? what would you say to people who have these fears? >> well, i would start by saying that saudis are equally scared and interested and curious about the united states, whether it is
fundamentally a strategic friend as our governments and our leaders have been consistently saying and performing on that assumption. and sometimes there are questions as to whether that strategic friendship is equally strong on this side of the world as it is in the kingdom. the only way we can get over that, i think, is to know each other better. >> but many people feel that at the heart of the regime's stability is this compact it has made with a religious establishment that is quite extreme. why is it so difficult to make that break? it seems as though the king is well liked, he clearly is a modernizer. god knows you have money. why -- why is it so hard to break with this -- >> let me start by telling you that the so-called compact as
you may have used that word or pact between the religious community and the kingdom and the leadership, the people of saudi arabia are religious people. their pride and their source of being is tied to not just the geography of saudi arabia and the fact that we have the two holiest mosques in islam in saudi arabia, the religion of islam started in mecca in saudi arabia, progressed to medina as you know, and the birth place of the prophet, and so religion for us is part and parcel of all life. interpretation of religion is another matter. and in that context, i would dispute the contention that the kingdom or the leadership in the kingdom has seeded place to
extremist interpretation of islam. if you have seen during the last 30 years since the attack on the mosque, we've had the hugest expansion, for example, of women's education. women's employment in government is the largest sector where women are employed, literally in the thousands, whether it is in education or in health services or in other such activities. >> you are such a modern, sew fis cated man. when you talk about women's education, you still have segregated education, you still have the women can't sit in the same room and men in college. surely you must regard that as backward? >> you must keep in mind as i tell you, that the society in saudi arabia is very entrenched
in tradition and in past history. and the leadership in the saudi arabia has been trying to either pull or push to move that society to better conditions for everybody, whether man or man, or whatever. it takes time. this country is an example in that. it was established on very high moral principles back in the 1700s and early 1800s, yet it didn't accomplish full women's integration into the society until 200 years later. if you look at the issue of blacks and whites in the united states, i was in college here in the mid 60s, i lived through the civil rights movement. this is what, 100 some years after the civil war, which was for to liberate the slaves. societies take time to change.
with the right leadership but also i think with the right education. >> let me finally ask you, how do you think president obama is regarded in the arab world? >> today not as well as he was a year or two ago. this is popular sentiment as shown in many surveys. public opinion until arab world is equally measured as it is anywhere. june 2009, his speech in cairo, the highest rating for president obama. june 2011, the lowest rating for president obama. it is a mathematical equation. >> thank you very much. >> thank you, sir. >> always a pleasure. >> we will be right back. [ male announcer ] your hard work has paid off.
and you want to pass along as much as possible to future generations. at northern trust, we know what works and what doesn't. as one of the nation's largest wealth managers, we can help you manage the complexities of transferring wealth. seeking to minimize taxes while helping maximize what's passed along. because you just never know how big those future generations might be. ♪ expertise matters. find it at northern trust.
i tell you what i can spend. i do my best to make it work. i'm back on the road safely. and i saved you money on brakes. that's personal pricing. the white house held a state dinner for visiting south korean president lee myung-bak this week and that brings me to my question of the week from the gps challenge. it is, 1874, was the year that president uhis ses s. grand held the first state dinner for a
foreign head of state. who was the guest of honor? was it, a, queen victoria of great britain, b kaiser wilhelm of germany, c king david of the sandwich islands or "d," president adoll thiers of france? we'll tell you the correct answer. go to cnn.com/gps for ten more challenging questions. while you're there, check out our website, the global public square. you'll find smart interviews and takes by some of our favorite experts and don't forget you can follow us on twitter and facebook. this week's book of the week is the newest "the quest, energy security and the remaking of the modern world." now the quest is not as compelling as the terrific last book "the prize" which won the pulitzer prize but this is almost like an encyclopedia of energy. if you want to know whether solar energy is viable, it will tell you, the deal on shale gas, 25 good pages on it, he has a
section on almost everything. really worth getting. for the last look, unless you're on seal team six or lived in the compound in abot bad you will probably never know if this digitally aged progressed image of osama bin laden actually looked like him when he met his demise. but there's somebody whom the image looks exactly like. and he is still alive. meet spanish politician gasper yamazaez. it's not accidental. the fbi said one of its artists found the picture of the spaniard on the internet and the bureau used it to push the $25 million bounty for the most wanted man in the world, by digitally aging him. oops. to add insult to injury, the spanish politician says his picture was used again, for this image of another al qaeda leader who was taken out by a cia drone over the summer.