Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  June 27, 2012 8:00pm-9:00pm EDT

8:00 pm
months of reporting, "fortune" magazine reveals a very different fast and furious. the bottom line -- letting guns walk was not, i repeat not, part of the plan. she writes five law enforcement agents directory involved in fast and furious tell fortune that the atf had no such tactic. she goes on to say, they insist they never purposefully allowed guns to be illegally trafficked. just the opposite. they say they seized weapons whenever they could, but were ham strung by prosecutors and weak laws, which stymied them at every turn. the house oversight committee is slamming the story. we're going to get to that in just a moment. however, committee chairman darrell issa declined to come on this program to elaborate. one committee member will join us in just a little bit. >> it's nice to see you. the premise of your article was there was no gun walking in fast
8:01 pm
and furious. which contradicts the central argument we've seen in the political sphere now for months. >> that's right. after sucks months of investigation, what became clear to me was the things that congress wasled holing up as centerpieces of proof that guns had been walked were, in fact, misconstru misconstrued, incorrect, resulted from other motives, other reasons, that there were alternate explanations and really, this was a case of cherry pick iing small phrases, sentences, without any of the context that you really need in order to understand what happened in phoenix group seven. >> so why back in november of 2011 would the attorney general eric holder say that, in fact, the tactic happen and it was unacceptable. let me play this a little bit. >> instances of so-called gun
8:02 pm
walking is simply unacceptable. regrettably this tactic was used as past of fast and furious, which was launched to combat gun trafficking and violence on our southwest border. >> it's that very testimony that many people, of course, have connected to and said is he's admitting gun walking. in fact, what he's saying there under oath completely contradicts what's in your article. >> right. well, this is where we get to a very murky place. because the letter that the justice department ended up retracting was a letter which said atf always attempts to intraaddict weapons. well, that wasn't the case in the john dodson investigation. >> so the "always" was the issue there. >> so they retracted the letter. in my article, i do say it appears the obama administration has basically saved or laid down on the railroad tracks in order
8:03 pm
to hold it at bay. >> republican lawmakers have been attacking the atf for not seizing enough weapons, which when you look at, as you describe the sort of weak possibility for prosecution has tremendous irony. >> well, this really gets even stranger because i had law enforcement agents speak to me because they said issa's inquiye is actually harming the second amendment. he's out there bashing atf agents for not seizing enough guns. these were guns deemed to be legally transferred by prosecutors. so what's the alternative? should they be going out and illegally seizing guns? this was a clash and a conflict that occurred repeatedly between the agents and the prosecutors. >> you end your article with a
8:04 pm
look at who really was part of fast and furious. the cartel and mexican nationals using their money to purchase those guns that were ultimately traced back to the fbi? >> that's right. >> they were being funded by the fbi. they were being paid by the fbi. >> that's right. this is the theory that nothing went as planned and expected. but the top two targets turned out to be on the fbi payroll. >> why has no one from the department of justice said in fast and furious there was no gun running. gun walking, excuse me. why has no one from the department of justice said in fast and furious, there was no gun walking? period. send of story. that's what your article says .but they have not said that. why not? >> i don't know exactly why. one sense is that, you know, when this scandal first broke and congress made the
8:05 pm
allegations, the justice department went to their political folks and asked what happened. they never went to dave, the citizens group and say sit down and tell us what happen. to this day he has not been questioned. so there's a sense that the justice department immediately wanted to deal with the political repercussions withouts inially graping with the substantive question of what actually happened. now, i think they would say this they have turned to the inspector general to do a thorough investigation and they are withholding judgment pending that eare view. but, in fact, i think anyone watching eric holder testifying would conclude that he believes that guns were walked. >> the focus now as we look at the contempt hearings, the question is, why not turn over the documents?
8:06 pm
that's become kind of the central question. if your research, can you answer that question? >> i can't answer that question, because i don't know exactly what's in those documents. but what's interesting is those documents are not about the substance of what occurred in phoenix. those documents are about the internal slib dplib rations within the justice department about how to respond to the congressional inquiry. so it's hard to say if those are politically damaging or what, in fact, is in them. it's just yet another segment of this inquiry that doesn't have to do with what actually happened. >> we have a statement from the oversight committee that weighed in on what they think of your article. i don't know if you've had a chance to see this yet. >> i think i have. >> here's what they say. "fortune's" story is a fantasy, made up from the accounts of those involved in fast and furious. it contains factual errors
8:07 pm
including the false statement that chairman issa has called for attorney general holder's resignation and multiple distortions. it hides critical information from readers including a report in "the wall street journal" indicating that its primary sources may be facing criminal charges. congressional staff gave "fortune" magazine numerous examples of false statements made by the story's primary source and the magds did not dispute this information. it did not, however, explain this material to its readers. they say it's a fantasy, it's made up of accounts of people who were involved in the recklessness that is fast and 2350ur furious. >> that's their claim. they've been repeating it for a year. many things brought to my attention are things that already been reported by others. what i've been trying to do is put aside everything that has been written so far about this claimed on television and say
8:08 pm
what did actually happen using sources that i had to weigh carefully, all the doms i was able to obtain and just to take a sober look at what occurred. some of the things they brought to my attention are ultimately not in the article because we felt they were not germane or they were not true or they were not necessarily relevant. >> and we should know that which i remember issa told fox news that the attorney general needs to either, quote, lead or resign. that would seem to be in error as well. thank you for joining us. a fascinating article. it's called the truth about the fast and furious scandal. appreciate it. >> a quick reminder. you can real katherine's entire report on cnn.com. joining me is john micah on the house committee on oversight.
8:09 pm
i know you've had a chance to read the article -- >> i haven't had a chance to read the article. i try not to read too many fiction or novel. >> she says that there are five people at the atf who were involved in this -- what was happening in phoenix who say there was no policy of gun walking. it did not happen. first of all, you just showed a clip of the attorney general saying gun walking happened. quite frankly, i'm a member of the investigative committee, one of the senior members of the panel. i don't take our investigative facts and information from a magazine or some article. all we're interested in and all we're responsible for doing is finding out who did what, getting the pertinent documents. this is an investigative arm of the house of representatives. there's no reason why we should
8:10 pm
be denied the documents to get to the truth of this. you know, this isn't some -- we're going to make up fantasy stories or take parts of information from some writer. this is a serious investigation. people were killed -- >> let's go back to what the writer is saying. this is not her opinion. she's saying there are five people -- >> i don't care if there are five or 10 or 20. >> the atf said it didn't happen. you don't care about what they're saying? >> ewith want all their information. if their testimony is pertinent, we'll bring them in. what we're asking for is the documents that are in possession of the government. and in this case, of the department of justice or any of its personnel that relate to this. we know there are more than 100,000 documents. we received about 7,000 or 8,000. that's about 7% or 8%. okay? >> this is almost a joke to say
8:11 pm
we should rely on some article in some magazine. >> i don't think she considers it a joke at all, sir. >> i do because i think this is making a farce out of the investigative process. under the soviet union, under the laws of the united states. >> she is reporting -- >> i don't care what she's reporting. she has nothing to do with our committee or our responsibili responsibilities on the committee. >> sir, may i ask a question? >> if it's not turned over by tomorrow, we will hold in contempt the house of representatives, eric holder, the attorney general of the united states. >> so she's saying she has spoken to people at the atf who said gun walking did not happen. >> you just told me a tape where the attorney general testified -- >> let me finish, if i may. her article said there is no gun
8:12 pm
walking. what evidence do you have that there was gun walking. what's your evidence? >> maybe i was watching a different program. i just saw eric holder say there was gun walking. >> what evidence do you have from the atf saying there was gun walking. >> well, just the attorney general. i guess we can't believe him. we don't know what to believe. that's the whole point here. we should be titled, an investigative arm of the house of representatives, this agency used taxpayers monies. it's authorized by the congress of the united states and you're telling me i have to rely on some novelist or some writer -- >> i'm telling you what the writer is raising here as some very interesting things. let me read to you -- >> all i want are the facts. >> i just want to give you something from her article. she said she mentions a guy who is on food stamps yet plunked down $300,000 for 476 firearms
8:13 pm
over six months. the supervisor asked the atf this they could arrest him and he was told they could not. he could not be arrested because under the law in the state of arizona you can buy massive numbers of guns, right? that is correct. so her argument is that there was no gun walking, that in fact, it was prosecutors -- let me finish my sentence. it was prosecutors, it was weak laws that, in fact, were the reason that those guns were able to get across the border. >> well, first of all, on february 4, 2011, the department of justice sent us a letter saying they didn't know anything about what was going on. there was nothing. we actually know from an e-mail in march that they knew and they chose those to cover it up for another 10 months. then they finally admitted something was going on. and just a few minutes ago, you played a tape, unless you doctored the tape, that was the
8:14 pm
attorney general of the united states saying eh thought there was gun walking going on. you're trying to tell me a committee of congress charged with specific jurisdiction for investigation over all of these agencies including the department of justice should just turn a blind eye when an agent is killed and others are murdered and we're using taxpayer dollars. >> let's talk that date you justice mentioned. february 4, 2011. that's a date you mentioned. justice department sends a letter to senator grassley. grassley seems to come back with proof that the atf had, in fact, walked guns. but he's talking actually about a different case. according to this reporter's case, agent john dodson, who is the whistle blowner this did walk guns. is it true or not the whistleblower in this case did walk guns in a totally different case? is that true or not? >> again, this isn't rocket
8:15 pm
science. this is not complicated. this is the prosecutorial arm. this is the department of justice buying weapons, we believe, because we don't know because we don't have the kt fas and they won't give us the information. >> if it's not fast and furious -- you're investigating it. this reporter has been doing it for six months. >> they try to keep the evidence from you. >> this reporter has been investigating it for six months and you -- >> i don't give a hill of beans about that reporter. >> you have been investigating it as well. >> we have an investigative staff charged by law and this committee under the constitution of the united states has a responsibility, taxpayers money and an agency which we fund from the government. they bought weapons, we believe. >> and she said done by the guy who's the whistleblower to you.
8:16 pm
that's what she says. >> she can say whatever she wants. she doesn't work for the committee. she wasn't elected to congress and she isn't charged with investigating this under the laws and constitution of the united states. she's probably a very nice lady, but that's not her responsibility. four responsibility is to represent the citizens paying for this whole fiasco and seeing an agent killed. you know, after -- we have to respond to the terry family who came to our committee. all i asked for was justice and a thorough investigation in the death of their loved one. >> it seemed if you wanted to keep the guns going to mexican cartels, why not advocate for stronger laws. why not make it easier for someone buying 476 weapons who appears to be on food stamps at the same time. wouldn't that actually be a good step? >> it could raise -- that could raise a good question. but the question at hand here is
8:17 pm
someone in the department of justice at whatever level -- >> that's not my question. >> to supply guns and at least one of those weapons was used in the death of a federal agent and hundreds of other -- >> and if you wanted to stop that from happening again, why not make the laws stronger. why not make the laws so that one person cannot buy 476 guns over six months, who, by the way, seems to be on food stamps and has no money. we should first make sure the department of jut isn't buying those weapons and supplying them to guns smugglers and murderers. when an agency of the united states government, we need to make sure this never happens again and the people responsible for one of the most horrendous kt as we've never seen out of
8:18 pm
the department of justice, those people are held accountable. one way or the other. >> why not an electric database that would be able to track gun sales real time. the atf agents wouldn't have to go by hand and try to backtrack weapons. the nra does not support that. the nra has been working against that. so why not support a gun sales database? >> well, again, a gun sale database is just trying to get the department of justice to keep tracks of the guns they're purchasing and supplying to drug deals and murders. wow. come on, let's get the government under control before we start restricting the rights of innocent citizens. >> so a database that would track -- >> so many peripherals you're --
8:19 pm
>> i'm just -- >> the database to keep track of the mess you've created, the murders from are taxpayer dollars. now we see some of the weapons are in the united states, too. this is a scheme that was cooked up by some people who don't want -- the facts to come out. >> you don't seem that interested in reading the article or talking about the five atf agents who say it didn't happen. you don't seem -- sir, you don't seem that interested in tracking down five atf agents who said gun walking didn't happen. >> i think we should track down everyone and hold everyone accountable. but that's part of our investigation. right now, you have impeding that investigation, both the department of the justice, now the president of the united states is with the kpeg tif privilege he's invoked and also with the attorney general who came before us and his agency
8:20 pm
provided us with initial information that was not truthful. we want to hold people accountable. >> i think a lot of people would agree with you. they want the truth, the facts and hold people responsible as well. >> i don't ask for one thing more and i think the people of the united states that we represent deserve that. >> i'm going to agree with you on that, sir. >> congressman micah, thank you. >> i'm a persistent person. >> as am i, sir. no question about that. we're on facebook. you can follow us on twitter as well@ac360. follow me as well, soleda soledad@soledado'bri soledad@soledado'brien. we're going to try to counter all of that with the facts. we're keeping them honest coming up next. ♪
8:21 pm
the radical new macbook pro with retina display. ♪ innovation...in every dimension. ♪ er is different but centurylink is committed to being a different kind of communications company by continuing to help you do more and focus on the things that matter to you.
8:22 pm
but they can also hold you back. unless you ask, "what's next?" introducing the all-new rx f sport. this is the pursuit of perfection.
8:23 pm
we are also keeping them honest tonight with the truth about health care reform and the consequences of the supreme court decision on it. you can already see people staking out their spots. many have already positions on the lawn. some have stirred up a storm of hype like you've never seen before tonight. we're going to try to cut through the noise and get to the facts. you're not getting them from supporters of the law or opponents. instead, when it comes to the health care debate in america, you're getting this.
8:24 pm
♪ >> that's a liberal group's response to republican paul ryan's plan for medicare to change it into a private system. >> the doctors tried the pills and the pills just don't work. no, i need a pacemaker. >> make no mistake about it. president obama and the
8:25 pm
democrats who wrote obamacare threw elderly citizens off the cliff when they increased medicare by $575 billion. >> seniors off the cliff. rm to, we're going to know whether the supreme court will uphold or strike down parts or all of the law. so tonight, all of the angles, starting with tom foreman. he's been looking about the competing flames about obamacare that just aren't so. >> democrats and republicans have vigorously debated a key question from the very start. how many money will health care reform save or cost taxpayers. their comments generally have gone this way. >> children with pre-existing conditions can get care, young people can stay on their policy until they're 26. preg nant women, breast and prostate cancer patients can no longer get thrown off their insurance. our seniors are paying less for
8:26 pm
their medical prescriptions. it will save taxpayers $1.3 trillion. >> we are going to repeal it and do everything we can over the course of how long it takes to stop this because it will ruin the best health care system. >> massive, huge conflicting claims. both sides say their numbers come from the nonpart sal congressional budget office. cbo says health care reform will cost more than $1 trillion over the next nine years, but it will be offset by savings to the novt, meaning despite all of that spending, the deficit should actually get smaller under this plan. so the democrats are right. hold on. the government may save money, but that does not necessarily mean that you, taxpayers, as nancy pelosi said, doesn't mean you will save money necessarily.
8:27 pm
depending on how you and your family fit into this equation. you may pay additional taxes, additional fees. an here's one last important point to consider from the cbo director. because of the size and scope of this reform he says certainly progressi projections of this legislation are uncertain. for either party to assert that they know these numbers are going to add up to some particular thing in 10 or 20 years is absolutely mised looing. >> there's also a debate over job killer or job creator. >> one says they're going to drive up the cost of -- there's going to be costs to small businesses. they can't support jobs. other people saying that there's going to be this growth of a huge amount of jobs, democrats say that. the truth is this is also not a clear thing. a lot of groups have looked at it. and by and large what they said is it seems to be a negligible
8:28 pm
change here. there will be some jobs lost, but some of that will be because people simply leave the work force. because they hold jobs now because they want to keep the insurance and they may leaf later on. again, the ycbo director says what it comes down to is the workforce could decrease by 1/2 of 1%. i think that makes the claims about jobs on both sides, that they'll all be wiped out or they'll growth enormously fall somewhere between incomplete and misleading. soledad? >> thank you. the patient protection and affordable care act, obamacare has lots of moving parts. that much is undeniable, whatever else you think of the law. parts to make insurance more affordable, make sure people can't be denied coverage and of course, the individual mandate. making healthy people buy insurance, paying into the system and not just sick people taking money out. joinings to talk about how those parts all fit together and how the skurt might take those parts
8:29 pm
apart, sanjay gupta and also jeff toobin who has been listening to oral arguments in the case and called them a disaster for the administration. not only do you say a disaster, you said a train wreck a plane wreck. you said the individual mandate is doomed. et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. has anything changed your mind since then and now? >> nope. the only thing we know is the oral argument. the supreme court is the one leak-proof institution in washington. and there have been no leaks about deliberations in this case. in my experience, this supreme court when you hear what they say at oral argument, that is a very, very good tip as to how they will vote in the case. i still believe that there balanced budget some sort of negative outcome, whether it's an individual man date.
8:30 pm
let's say the individual mandate is ruled unconstitutional. what does that literally mean for insurance companies? >> the people who are buying into the system help offset the cost of people who are sick and require more money to pay for their health care. you get healthy people to pay in, they're actually sort of the cash for the system. but this is more psychological. if you're not going to be discriminated against based on a pre-existing condition, why would you buy health care insurance until you're already sick. it's like buying car insurance when you're on the side of the road in a middle of a wreck. so this exact situation happened in kentucky. they tried this. they said we're not going to have a mandate, we're also not going to allow insurance companies to sdis christmas ndi.
8:31 pm
>> what if the whole entire thing is thrown out? >> we're literally back to square one. you had tens of millions of people who don't have health care insurance. both sides of the party have said they want to do something here. i had a conversation with the health care adviser for governor romney. he said obviously governor romney has a mandate in the state of massachusetts as governor. he said look, we'll continue to push for people not to be discriminated against and we will open up insurance across state lines. so you can compete by buying insurance here versus there and that may drive down costs. they also want to incentivize people who buy health insurance, not penalize them if they don't. >> if the individual mandate or even if the entire law is thrown out, let's look at the implications of that. you and i have talked before that the supreme court justices
8:32 pm
themselves seem to be politically aligned. >> welsh you know, this court, the most significant fact you can know about this current supreme court is that there are five republicans and four democrats. everything else is just conversation. this is a politically divided institution, just as the congress is across first street. so many of the important cases come out 5-4. citizens united came out 5-4. if this is a 5-4 decision with the five republicans against the four democrats and it overturns some significant part of the health care law, that will contribute to a certain cynicism about the work of the supreme court. but that cynicism might be justified. >> we're watching it. it's going to happen tomorrow. 10:00 a.m. thank you, appreciate it. coming up, tens of thousands of evacuations as a wildfire threatens more neighborhoods around colorado springs. literally to run to her apartment with her young son.
8:33 pm
that's coming up next . catch a show. make your point make a memory make a masterpiece. read something watch something and learn something. do it all more beautifully, with the retina display on ipad. delivering mail, medicine and packages. yet the house is considering a bill to close thousands of offices, slash service and layoff over 100,000 workers. the postal service is recording financial losses, but not for reasons you might think. the problem ? a burden no other agency or company bears. a 2006 law that drains $5 billion a year
8:34 pm
from post office revenue while the postal service is forced to overpay billions more into federal accounts. house bill 2309 is not the answer. with two times the points on dining in restaurants, you may find yourself asking why not, a lot. chase sapphire preferred.
8:35 pm
8:36 pm
. president obama is scheduled to go to colorado on friday to survey the damage from those devastating wildfires. and thank firefighters for their hard and dangerous work. there are many evacuations today as the giant wildfire threatens more neighborhoods in and around colorado springs. take a look at some of these stunning pictures from the denver post. there are many photos at the denver post.com. the waldo canyon fire has burned more than 15,000 acres.
8:37 pm
there are now 12 wildfires working across that state. mindy levinson is one of the thousands of colorado springs residents forced to leave home because of the firefighters. i know you were heading back home and you were told suddenly to evacuate. what happened? >> i got home, i stopped to drop stuff off at the high school. i got home, took a shower and i stepped out of the shower and smoke filled the apartment. the smoke was awful and choking. it was time to get out of dodge. >> you must have been so afraid? >> terrified. but i had to hold it together for my son. >> you thought it might have come to this eventually where
8:38 pm
you're going to have to grab your stuff and get out. how much time did you have to get everything and why did you think it could come to this? >> i had my 72-hour kit put together. looking back, i wish i had prepared a little more. maybe pack a little more and consider what they are missing. >> what are you mising? what do you wish you had brought? >> a lot of pictures, just mementoes of the things i have gone through in my life. things i would like to remember and have a physical remembrance of. >> any idea how your apartment is? >> right now, i have a friend who is a firefighter on the ground. i would like to thank him for all his hard work. he's keeping an eye on my place as much as he can and as far as i know it's not been overtaken as of yet. the winds, however, are blowing
8:39 pm
in that direction. so i'm crossing my fingers and saying some prayers. >> the pictures are just stunning. they break your heart. it look s horrific and the smok looks like it's choking. what was it like to be in the middle of that? >> it was armageddon. you couldn't see anything but smoke and glowing red around you. you knew it was close. coming down where you could see a little through the smoke. you could see all the flaming advancing down the mountain. you know, just so rapidly. it was amazing in such a tragic way. >> tell me about where you're staying now, mindy and how your son is doing now that you're out of the apartment. >> we are saying down with some wonderful friends in the army that opened their doors to us. now he's playing with an x box
8:40 pm
with a new best friend. distraction is really great right now. >> it is. certainly when you're 8 years old. and i bet it is for you, too. mindy levinson, thank you for sharing your story with us. we'll wsh you t we'll wish you the best of luck and keep us updated on what's happening with your home. coming up next, a sexual predator with many faces but no name. he's known as the tear drop rapist. and los angeles police are warning parents no the to let their daughters walk alone until he's caught. we've got the full story coming up. the right amount of light. so you see everything the way it's meant to be seen. experience life well lit, ask for transitions adaptive lenses.
8:41 pm
the radical new macbook pro with retina display. ♪ innovation...in every dimension. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] its lightweight construction makes it nimble... ♪ its road gripping performance makes it a cadillac. introducing the all-new cadillac xts. available with advanced haldex all-wheel drive. [ engine revving ] it's bringing the future forward.
8:42 pm
8:43 pm
a massive effort is under way by the los angeles police department to catch the so-called tear drop rapist and the city is offering a $50,000 reward for information that will help put him bars. more from miguel marquez with the very latest. good evening. >> good evening there, soledad. the tear drop rapist has truck again. 12 days ago, this man attempted to rape a young woman right in
8:44 pm
central los angeles. and now police are redoubling their efforts. it is a city wide man hunt. >> he's called the tear drop rapist, gone for seven years but now he's back, terrorizing the streets of los angeles. >> we're asking parents to ensure their young teenage daughters are accompanied. >> reporter: since 1996, mr. po have linked him to attacks on young women. but in 2005, he stopped, seemingly disappear popped. >> this case was totally cold and then came back to life. >> detectives are leading a team of 20 investigate sors debt kated to capturing one of the most notorious predators in los angeles history. his crimes commit committed along a ten-mile corridor running through the center of the city. >> for the third time he hits many miles away, way up north.
8:45 pm
>> and then he jumps all the way down south where he hits very close to each other. >> reporter: the investigation -- massive. 700 boxes old and closed cases dating back to 1996 have been ordered up. detectives comb through them, looking for missing clues, connected cases, even mislaid files. a pain staking re-examination of the entire case. >> we're starting from the beginning. two sketches of the suspect buried in old case filings. the drawings date back to 1996, some of them spot on. in others, his face different. eastern the tear drop isn't consistent. at times on the right, then on the left. sometimes two drops, others not there at all. some look very much alike. some look nothing alike. is this typical in a case like this? >> you're dealing with victims that range from 14 to 41 years of age. >> when someone is involved in a
8:46 pm
situation like this where it's violent and happens very quickly. there's a gun involved, a knife involved, some type of a weapon, every person focuses on something different. >> but they are the same man. six of the stretches have been tied together by dna evidence. where there is no dna, the predator is tied to crime by his very specific method. he strikes early in the morn, strikes a friendly conversation, pulls out a gun or a knife then moves the women to a secluded area. the women were either. coming to or leaving a bus stop. in 2003, a young woman was grabbed here and taken around the corner. he then moved her down this very long alley here and this is where the assault occurred. it is possible the rapist watches his victims for hours or days before striking. profiling the area and them. why is it so hard to catch a guy like this?
8:47 pm
>> in one way, you could almost say, i don't know if he's smart or he's lucky about the area headquarters's choss he's chosen.. >> and he blends in. he can walk up and spark a conversation and the victim doesn't feel threatened until a weapon is seen. >> reporter: they're returning to every single crime scene, familiarizing themselves with every aspect of the case. >> it's going to be that one thing where someone is going to say, it looks like a guy i used to work with. his name is joe smith. >> investigators confident they'll get their man if they can force that one crew into the light. a clue that would put a serial rapist in prison. >> so how do you stop a sexual predator who's so adept at blending in and so good at not getting caught? joining me now is former fbi profiler mary ellen o'toole, also the author of "dangerous
8:48 pm
instincts" how gut feelings betray us. what would make a predator like this go quiet for so long and resurface? >> well, we think he's gone can quiet, but the crime of rape is an often unreported crime. there are some that could have gone unreported. at the same time, there are possibilities that he has been arrested, incarcerated. that he's relocated. but another consideration that i think is very important is that we know there are cases where the offender has had a life change. in other words, he's gotten married or taken on a new, for example, family responsibility. so he's not free to go out and follow and assault these women. so all three of these possibilities could exist in this case. >> he's been consistent in location and time of day.
8:49 pm
he's been inconsistent in the age of the victim. anywhere from 14 to 41. what do those things tell you? >> the fact that his mo ddus operand zi the same suggests that has worked for him in the past. and the m.o. indicates, it's defined as behavior the offender engages in to keep from being arrested. he goes out early morning hours, he picks someone by themselves where is there's no witnesses around. those are behaviors that really minimize his risk of being apprehended. but his signature behaviors can involve more of the sexual, the sexual activity that he engages in. the fact that there's a range in your victim's age would suggest to me behaviorally that this is someone that really picks the opportunity and doesn't stay on a corner and wait for a specific looking person of a specific age, so he's very opportunistic when it comes to access of his
8:50 pm
victims. >> thanks for that insight. appreciate it. come up next, a bombing of a pro regime tv station has killed four security guards. nformed catch a show. make your point make a memory make a masterpiece. read something watch something and learn something. do it all more beautifully, with the retina display on ipad. ♪... ♪...
8:51 pm
♪... choose the perfect hotel without bidding. you know what's exciting? graduation. when i look up into my students faces, i see pride. you know, i have done something worthwhile. when i earned my doctorate through university of phoenix, that pride, that was on my face. i am jocelyn taylor. i'm committed to making a difference in people's lives, and i am a phoenix. visit phoenix.edu to find the program that's right for you. enroll now.
8:52 pm
[ male announcer ] we began with the rx. ♪ then we turned the page, creating the rx hybrid. ♪ now we've turned the page again with the all-new rx f sport. ♪ this is the next chapter for the rx. this is the next chapter for lexus. this is the pursuit of perfection.
8:53 pm
the latest now on other stories we've been following. >> seven people were killed in the bombing of a pro regime television station. three journalists and four security guards died in the station's headquarters near damascus. opposition groups say at least 83 people were killed in
8:54 pm
violence throughout syria today. federal investigators are looking into whether stowaways are hidden inside a shipping container aboard a cargo ship. the coast guard team heard sounds inside a container during a routine security check. the ship made stops in pakistan and egypt. the food and drug administration wednesday apruzed a treatment for chronic weight problems in adults who have medical conditions caused by their ob e obesi obesity. patients in trials lost up to 5% of their body weight. and cue the jersey smells jokes. trucks carrying billboards that smell like cat ton candy will be cruising parking lots to advertise the new jersey state fair. >> that sounds good. time now for "the shot." every bride and groom takes the plunge when they say i do.
8:55 pm
but a couple literally took the plunge. they were posing on a pier. they all took an unexpected swim. this is what you call a little glitch. nobody was hurt, apparently. the groom, though, has some explaining to do. watch the slow mo version of the groom. watch him carefully. what does he do? does he check on his darling pride? no, you notice he saves himself. she's on her own. it's every man for himself? this one. nobody was hurt unfortunately but he might want to work on that, you know, for better or worse, stick together. >> i'm just thinking just married and already in the doghouse. >> i like that. all right, thanks. we're going to be right back. [ male announcer ] every day, thousands of people
8:56 pm
are choosing advil®. here's one story. i'm keith baraka and i'm a fire fighter. it's an honor to be a fire fighter. my job involves life or death situations and it's very physically demanding. if i'm sore, i have a headache, i'm not at my best. advil® is my go to. it's my number one pain reliever. advil® just works for me. [ male announcer ] make the switch. take action. take advil®. and if pain keeps you up, sleep better with advil pm®.
8:57 pm
8:58 pm
8:59 pm
tonight, the woman who showed everyone what happens when harry met solly. >> i'll have what she's having. >> two of the people

60 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on