tv Washington Journal Dylan Scott Discusses Medicare Drug Prices CSPAN January 30, 2017 12:59pm-1:30pm EST
crarof ste chk sum wl k r a onwe dayor aoton llso a ocur ve t miti isefo 50 eaertoy. yocaseth sate dete li ooucoann nwo sp2. e s.ou wl bk for giate sisst:0 stn 0d erarsen ll dli thatna pksnd crtionalil. d is wkeplihe obadmisatngea. usetnsoreglave rkt 00.m ete. e e hseivhe o sp. ilweai f t hseo gal ck i aooat a diuson omeca a dg icg a pmis om pridt ump to lowerru ic throu notti fm isorng "shgt url. "whitojona cties ho: lasct giss talut -- inuso abt w psintru wt iowrupass. whitoorspde wi st ws wh i stane? ubc e naon
diti cerg hltar an miceas o oosn thboonlo" b we'v rorrscross t ny clina cplin c. ho: iheebteor wt floyo poin t'getoru pci. atidond umpris wh ikiit -ca i prcrtion dg pres gut:e id hwas tbrg presscptn ug hohean tdo tt wt unua ean t cngouhe del goveme -hoth del veme ps tt mice d diidndan meirt netiio bwe t vemendrucoans. ats uay mein y ar fm moat potian wthmos rwd d hes ae wng h pty aees ierti. ho:e vepealho edar cien.
wth iwod dre pcelor d y wld rnsuciinit so tt ovs d u c e rbvuseanshyha is. pital stfohnltain--ot onalngbo ion caai tilut t oni ysf t ainistrio ir iseanpir t prs nfen oony st wk sk aut ic.rti dg id cp] y hrdheredent tk dgsndcef neo t osris wn bk anacri arceic iusy. on aise wl rk hendstds aweefm rla a rea o bemear gti aolof the co odrs ge op aesangrte aes anreerla i hltar pt t.y turhoumrs
207480 ete ocera 01ouaind chgi t whe he iio hpe i idce it ulerris r t ullor icor e dse udt t cgrsial fi has lkeathind sa t oy y aie avgss ithe feragornnts wli t dgs aesit cta d charg hhecoayor fl o n cert. anth i wrehe tmp pocy a picth docts p fwa rs to ouble cae u n imagi how e prmeucainstry t pnsan uicy ta i i seby'
anart n' g t dg beusthovnmt ide e egiaon y he ethe pri pntoe n'cor . st yenon tmp pocyndolyemra put foar omri on brdith th ans? es i w ierti i t onesanri d fo t sate coite e moatpued h oth beusit ia polic me a hwa ncoitl yi i wli tlo a it aoue meond trumwie s ssndt pics wa t esentrp was. t treaseltance d nyppitheee emgey puicanshoou veo sseglaono ke apno stutt. mice -steernlfd- lfd, mne
caergo moin thk u r c-span th i aweso. omyru t ltimi t imycoayas$70 d w i20. wgrns ss e icwa gngo bemyo-y $1,1. alled d kewhndhe nsan ipang00 sshathpre othdr we u$6. cat en t atruno he goffhat mecaon know athis ishe biroemndeason prcrti dgsaveein ns mh tt op e yi hh o o p-opoet a t rsoit ia lica iue soomhi twah etr o t t rormeca
inhe reaan rla o affordlearacilbe isomethg at adess th tvell co odrsr ea t ouofoctapeoe are- ct op a yi ues stonltnaveffdae epcentlaut foarwasetoolnsf ndenor csi o ui losia. dheadesth iuen epcentlath lk aut es treast en eplin an clinthnehaas ru i esipon he-oay rema pplha thkecseeplinsil ne doctiuprto ss a an ireac aorbl ca a ty y setng in odrivy preso n ert lst hafuofemra.
le d etr ok gtu odrris etemra t vo tpuerhe snare aieme ith op qstn. ho: erisro ty aedarecie. ev. ll: odmoin gelen. eson on iea fm e se tn eth ysnlsomhi ido meca igogo baru. icis te iitn e dd? eoe rsad rg t iurceomni d cts wt t wte omaa me al wh soth i w tsensan coans n ckpheris beusoba aow tm d it gut:n e esonf hi itesf etr n troams fincllsoenr t dendonhi ptyousk inooing bkrt y
rubca wld sanls u ketrtul ans erheonte i unntarit fincl prle. i n'thk ers bn y rubca a gng are mice t nr te. e foab ce t ll a g ou pbl a dat t tge tou t nt ye oso d dohiomhi t wah heebe erhe s w duryac. eyidth dto a la a dg inst, eyer athtae t aorblca aas pplut l o crithe iusy y- wh e w ttg erhe fis li. alorotay wi teplinsn l nan rlanghe lle cci faor ho: oualbo t duryy-. he a--y-. erwan fo tddss th a d t iusy lp stha es t dg iusy?
ye gut:nehi tt n llnobo t c. t g tthtae rlan aeeto cpl thgs th sd warwiintoay ov t las st n ge e bge rebates it medicaid and cover this well medicare recipients were facing. but then we don't want to see controls.t price that was a deal that the obama administration was willing to ake because having the drug industry on your se helps g in de. stweilta authe ndtrloyirm aconenhihaee ru dboy e mistti bughtp ew adamigomg t. nef e w coercials th put out vid clip] do t go gentlinto tha good nigh
pricing. guest: the drug industry wants o keep the debate focused on the fact they create innovative save nes that improve an people's lives and that is their argument. those are the -- we have to be a certain price to get the breakthrough treatments. it has been innd their playbook that is the fundamental architect. innovators and we create medicines as that ad made clear will change the world. any effort to crack down on prices could hinder those development efforts. host: mary is in tacoma, washington. good morning. host: good morning. sure a question but not if my facts are correct but if president bush negotiated medicare part d where that we were not allowed to -- or the government as not allowed to negotiate
prices with the fapharmacologic industry. where did that end up with the .c.a. and current decision to try to get prices down? guest: you have your history right. the medicare prescription drug the 2000's passed in under president bush and part of that law stipulated that the a whole overnment as and medicare program as a whole would not be allowed to prices directly. that was left to the private that and murder the part d program. it would require congress to act to change that part of the law. why it becomes very difficult for president trump to implement his policy because historically ve been very reluctant to allow the federal government it get so the drug nvolved in market. ost: this is a call from
pennsylvania, medicare recipient. caller: good morning, gentlemen. medicare is k that going to go bankrupt. of use we have a way [indiscernible]. medicareem i have with is i did not know it was you had to have it because my prescription has so any side effects it was making me sicker than i was and i decided not to use prescription. then i was penalized for not prescription. so you have every month until the day i die i have to pay $28 for not having prescription. give me prescription that doesn't have that many side effects, yes. penalized because of my choice and i thought it was my to choose for myself and my health and my
now i'm penalized for it. kind ofhis goes back to two fundamental things. one is that medicare is a it will be ram that difficult to change because so it.y seniors are affected by it is the single second biggest insurer in the country. but at the same time it is not a perfect program and people do face out-of-pocket costs and of their y money out -- have to pay money out of their own pockets so you could minor changes because there are ways that could help address a situation like yours. the overarching program effects so many it is to imagine the bigger republican plans for overhauling through.ng .ost: allen from missouri next caller: during the election -- process i ad had conversations with friends obama he advantages of
are with, as related to obamare and they all said care is driving up medicare costs. fact that d out the would oughnut hole disappear if obama care was repealed, they said that hasn't any difference anyway. i can say for myself it made a huge difference. so has there been any discussion medicare underof process?m care repeal guest: to your point, there was wherech before the a.c.a. nce medicare recipients hit a thresh held for drugs the benefit stopped and they had to full cost until it kicked in and a.c.a. fixed that nd made sure people were
covered all the way through on prescription drug spending. -- a ton ofn a 10 schemecause in the grand it is a small piece but it is important and i think most of he people i tacked to, lobbyists and -- talked to they don't think that is the kind of to g that republicans want roll back. there's discussion about how there are good things in the popular provisions they would want to keep in closing the doughnut hole is one.ably host: steve from florida calling in. host: good morning. thank you for taking the call. he biggest problem i see in healthcare is the whole discussion 2010 the democrats the ou will -- between democrats and republicans is nsurance and they are totally different. so, the focus on the quality care. there's no discussion of value. what are we paying when we pay
insurance premium and what do we get back? insurance and is healthcare are the same and they are not. 20 instance, there are million americans with health insurance who never had it before. we don't know what healthcare they are getting and what they are using because we the quality ofed care by the performance of the octors in terms of complying guidelines of care from c.d.c. on.american heart so, and so that data has been available for 30 years with insurance carriers to organize in a sense.n that makes we don't have a measure to tell what is the value of either program, any programs that we have. that is what is wrecking the system. choosing your own doctor is something that was promised in really re and it should be. not an issue. because if a doctor is compliant
proper guidelines and providing patients with good preventive sense of care and long-term care, the dramatically.p the cost is not necessarily related to how much you spend or a particular unit of service. it really depends on what the sum of the services are over time. so, it's not an issue of whether doctor is perceived to be a good doctor or the waiting time will attack. what is the value of care he is providing. the call.ks for measurements on quality of care, do we do it now? guest: that is the interesting interesting thing a.c.a. did is created pilot programs it allow doctors and systems it be paid on more value based than one fee service. so, there's a couple of different ways it measure that.
outcomes and ent patient satisfaction and so those programs are probably something that could be continued going forward. create this innovation center in the department of health and human at the hearing last week profiles indicated that is saihe would be inresting it keepi that. experiments to allow us to pay more for value as opposed i think is uantity something that is a conversation that started and will continue will ere's in sign it stop. florida to to ocala craig a medicare recipient. caller: good morning. people don't realize when they look at the paycheck it do not say social security or medicare. 45% -- 1.45% out of every paycheck.
work 40 years and say you that 50,000 for 40 years, means they are taking roughly for 40 your check years. when you retire they take an of the al $105 out social security check. -- is it that they call this they laughingly say it is an entitlement program. for you pay for something 40 years and you look at it over a lot of money and you are still paying after you retire. goes back to the point away made before which is medicare is a popular program any serious effort to dramatically overhaul it will problems.political there was talk shortly after president trump was elected and epublicans had seized full control congress said this is their opportunity, they have overhaul ng to medicare but you will notice when they issipated
have the more immediate issue of the affordable care act to deal with. is a third rail of politics. that is the cliche and i think quickly realized if we want to get a.c.a. repealing the which will be difficult itself e can't afford to try to go touch and overhaul medicare which is bigger and more popular program. there were folks earlier this month i remember late night issue specifically the issue of drug pricing taken series e senate with a of other votes. remind us what happened and drug that sends to companies. guest: there were two votes. to was allow medicare negotiate drug prices and that failed on a party line. democrats for and republicans against and that goes back to even though trump says he wants do it is not something his party historically wanted to do. other would have allowed
prescription drugs in canada cheaply to bemore reimported to the united states. that is a little more because it was mostly democrats who voted for republicans n approximately did and on the other side a dozen democrats and bulk of in republicans so it failed but that suggested there could be ome bipartisan interest in doing something about drug prices, maybe allowing drugs to from canada is one place the republicans might be willing to go. at least an s indication it drug makers that this is not a purely party line some and there is willingness to work across the aisle. on : it gave tell guidance where they need to go for lobbying efforts. guest: yes. lawmakers are willing to talk. a call from connecticut medicare recipient. caller: good morning.
said e recently just now discussed they first this discussion of medicine paid for and not in tiated at that time, other words the insurance company agreed to the whole thing because they were not be involved with the in pricing the prescription drugs through medicare. , and s i understand it your guest responded to that and said yes, that is true, that was part of he agreement, the beginning of medicare's discussion of it.
said that they didn't want to -- the congress idn't want to involve negotiating with the insurance prescription ing costs. the veterans administration does just that. they charge, as i understand is paid for under medicare. n other words, for veterans administration the insurance government to the negotiate with them about the price. if that is the case, why that happen in medicare? what is this business about to ress not wanting negotiate the price? host: thanks for the question. yes, the your point,
veterans affairs department has drug eeway to negotiate prices under current federal law. he reason that is has a long complicated history, but i think that one of the things that is mportant to remember is often veterans can get private insurance even if they can't get a benefit or a drug through the v.a. so we i talk it people they pointed out the distinction although democrats will make the you did we do there in one another. why not the other thing to keep in mind is the drug companies and i congressional republicans would argue the private market works and we plans and w private drug companies to negotiate amongst themselves and we don't the federal government involved. host: we have suzanne waiting in hudson, florida. medicare recipient. host: good morning. how are you? well.r: doing go ahead. caller: the reason i'm calling almost 50 and i have
pain issues. have nerve damage and fibromyalgia and cannot work. i just went to my doctor's this past week and i saw law apparently there's some coming into effect that they are orcing the drug companies to educe high roko donate by -- hydrocodone by 75% and opioid by 25%. because i can barely take care of my son who 13 and if there are new drugs o you know, i don't know if that is going to be covered by medicare. i'm very concerned.
lawmakers and policy makers going forward and i don't know how that gets resolved, but problem, scale of the 30,000 -- excuse me, 30,000 opiood dieing from overdose per year, people having real pain problems, tough line to walk for policymakers going forward. host: to read about it going forward, statten news >> a reminder that the u.s.
house will gavel in at 2:00 eastern today to consider seven bills dealing with national parks and recreation areas. coming up later in the week. house members will vote on repealing measures from the obama administration to reduce waste from coal wining and natural gas drilling. see the house live here on c-span starting at 2:00 p.m. eastern. also today white house press secretary sean spicer will be briefing reporters here in the white house briefing room. live picture here with -- we expect lots of talk about today's travel -- travel ban instituted over the weekend, and recent executive orders that were signed by the president. all scheduled to get under way in a couple moments. we'll bring you as much as we can before the house comes in at 2:00 p.m. eastern.
>> the white house briefing starting shortly. briefing starting shortly. we'll have it live for you here when it gets under way on c-span. until then a conversation from this morning's "washington journal." looking at student loan cost. hi. host: each week in this segment "washington journal" we look at how your money is at work in different federal program. talking about how much certain student loan repayment costing federal