Skip to main content

tv   Cavuto Coast to Coast  FOX Business  November 15, 2015 11:00pm-12:01am EST

11:00 pm
harder than they have, but the economy has changed underneath their feet. young americans who owe thousands in student loans for a degree that doesn't lead to a job. for the first time in 35 years, more businesses dying than starting, and around the world every day brings news of a new humiliation for america, many, the direct consequence of decisions made when hillary clinton was secretary of state. the democratic party and the political left has no ideas of the fewer. all the ideas are the same tired ideas of the past. more spending, more government, their answer is a new tax on someone and new government program. this nation is going to turn the page, and that's what this election should be about, and as i said at the first debate, if i am our nominee, they'll be the party of the past. we will be the party of the 21st century. [applause]
11:01 pm
>> and maria i will note, she's got a lot of experience but policy proven disastrous. every region in the world has gotten worse under her leadership, we abandoned the relationship of israel, radical terrorism is on the rise. iran is getting $100 billion and on the verge of getting a nuclear weapon, everything she's put her hand to is touched, and when we talk about the cronyism of washington, hillary clinton embodies the cronyism of washington, and i'll give you an example of that which is the congressional exemption from obamacare which is fundamentally wrong, and i'll tell you this, if i'm elected president, i will veto any statute that exempts members of congress. the law should apply evenly to every american. [applause] moderator: thank you. i think it's fair to say you're not fans of hillary clinton's resumes. all right, mr. trump. >> we are not.
11:02 pm
moderator: i had a feeling, as perhaps the most successful capitalist on this stage tonight, you acknowledged some give capitalism a bad name. particularly critical of businesses that find all sorts of ways of paying their taxes by keeping money abroad. but your own plan includes incentive to bring more than $2 trillion home. isn't that like a onetime bounty? some of the guys you all but call pirates so they keep the loot and pay only a small price to bring it back? >> what's happening neil is not the subject of conversation by politicians, as primarily the only politician, i guess other than carly on the stage, they haven't talked about corporate inversion. corporate inversion, companies are leaving. we used to leave new york to go to florida, better taxes, maybe something else. now they're leaving the united states to go to other countries. they have trillions of dollars in those other countries, going
11:03 pm
for two reasons, they can't get their money back in. something where the democrats and the republicans both agree. it's the only thing i can think of, they both agree, let the money come back, in 3 1/2 years, they can't make a deal. can't get the money in. it's probably 2 1/2 trillion, but i think it's much more than that. all of that money could come right in, and be used to rebuild our country, and investments in our country. they can't do it. what we have to do, and what i've done is made the tax rate, and one of the reasons they don't bring into the tax is obnoxious, they can't do it. i made it a 10% number, i've been highly praised for, it we're going to get rid of the bureaucratic problems and roadblocks because that's also a problem, and all of the money pour back into the united states, it's going to be used to build businesses, jobs and everything else, and as i say, my expression is let's make america great again. [applause]
11:04 pm
. moderator: senator paul, you are one of 15 republicans to vote for an amendment which states that human activity contributed to climate change. president obama has announced an aggressive plan to cut carbon emissions. at the same time, energy production in america has boomed. is it possible to continue this boom and move toward energy self-sufficiency, while at the same time pursuing a meaningful climate change program? >> the first thing i would do as president is repeal the regulations that are hampering our energy that the president has put in place. [applause] >> including the clean power act, while i do think man may have a role in our climate, i think nature also has a role. the planet's 1.5 billion years old, we've been through
11:05 pm
geologic age, through geologic age. temperatures have been warmer, colder, temperatures in the atmosphere has been higher. we need to look before we leap. the president's often fond of saying he wants a balanced solution, but we need to balance keeping the environment clean, we will have rules for that, but we've got to balance that with the economy. he's devastated my state. i say the president is not only destroying kentucky, he's destroying the democrat party because nobody wants to associate with him. what we really need is somebody that understands we need energy of all forms, and that means we will have solar and wind and hydro, but we will still have coal and we will have natural gas, and we've got to have an all of the above policy. but it would be a mistake to shut down all of our industries in the coal fields and shut down the coal power plants. if we did so, we'll have a day we wake up and big cities are very cold or very hot. it's a big danger and shouldn't
11:06 pm
do it. and what we should do is say we want all of the above, free up the energy sector and let people produce, drill, let them explore. moderator: thank you, sir? >> maria, critically, when it comes to climate change. >> we've had a 10% reduction in carbon emissions, it isn't because of solyndra. it isn't because of the central players in washington, d.c. it's because we've had a great american success story. the explosion of natural gas taking two existing technologies and applying it through innovation has created lower carbon emissions, lower energy costs. 40% of all the economic activity in the age of obama has come from the energy sector and hillary clinton wants to suppress that. i think we ought to be expanding this. high growth is the path to lower carbon and more jobs. i know for a fact as governor of the state of florida, we created the largest land purchasing programs and environmental cleanup programs because we had a growing economy.
11:07 pm
revenues were growing at 4.4%, it allowed for resources to protect the natural systems. we've got to get to a conservation environment that goes beyond carbon. moderator: i know you want to talks, but we also promised to get people home tonight. and we are going to take a quick break here. i think it is fair to say at this juncture, you can discuss these issues and only business issues to keep it interesting. stick around for the candidates's closing statements after this.
11:08 pm
it's a highly thercontagious disease.here. it can be especially serious- even fatal to infants. unfortunately, many people who spread it may not know they have it. it's called whooping cough. and the cdc recommends everyone, including those around babies, make sure their whooping cough vaccination is up to date. understand the danger your new grandchild faces. talk to your doctor or pharmacist about you and your family getting a whooping cough vaccination today.
11:09 pm
11:10 pm
. moderator: welcome back to the republican presidential debate. and now candidates, it's time for your closing statements. you get 30 seconds each and senator paul, we will begin with you. >> we're the richest, freest, most humanitarian nation in the history of mankind. but we also borrow a million dollars a minute. and the question i have for all americans is think about it, you can be a fiscal conservative if you don't conserve all of the money? if you're a profluggate spender and spend for the military, is that a conservative notion? we have to be conservative with
11:11 pm
all spending, domestic spending and welfare spending. i'm the only fiscal conservative on the stage. [applause] moderator: thank you, senator. governor kasich? >> well, ladies and gentlemen, if hillary clinton or bernie sanders were to win this election, my 16-year-olds, i worry about what their life is going to be like. you know, the conservative movement is all about opportunity. it is about lower taxes, it's about balanced budgets, about less regulation, and about sending power, money and influence back to where we live so we can run america from the bottom up. in addition to, that once we have the power and the money and the influence with programs we ship out, each of us have a responsibility, to reach out and to rebuild our families, make them stronger and connect our neighborhoods. all that together, wealth, connection, family, america's greatest days are ahead.
11:12 pm
we must win this election. [applause] moderator: carly fiorina? >> imagine a clinton presidency. our military will continue to deteriorate, our veterans will not be cared for, and no, mrs. clinton, that situation is not exaggerated. the rich will get richer, the poor will get poorer, the middle class will continue to get crushed. as bad as that picture is, what's worse is a clinton presidency will corrode the character of this nation because of the clinton way. say whatever have you, to lie as long as you can get away with it. we must beat hillary clinton. carly fiorina can beat hillary clinton. i will beat hillary clinton, and under a president fiorina, we will restore the character of this nation, the security of this nation, the prosperity of this nation because as citizens, we will take our government back.
11:13 pm
[applause] moderator: former governor jeb bush. >> jane horton is sitting with my wife here today, her husband chris was killed in action in afghanistan, and jane spends her time now defending and fighting for military families. they're both heroes. i don't think we need an agitator in chief or a divider in chief, we need a commander in chief that will rebuild our military and restore respect to our veterans by revamping and fixing a broken veteran's administration, that's my pledge to you. i ask for your support. thank you. [applause] . moderator: senator ted cruz? >> 58 years ago, my father fled cuba. as he stood on the deck of the ferryboat with the wind and salt air blowing, he looked back at the oppression and torture he was escaping, and yet he looked forward to the promise of america.
11:14 pm
his story is our story, what ties americans together is we are all the children of those who risked everything for freedom. america is in crisis now. i believe in america, and if we get back to the free market principles and constitutional liberties that built this country, we can turn this country around. i believe that 2016 will be an election like 1980, that we will win by following reagan's admonition to paint in bold colors not pale pastels. we're building a grassroots army. i ask you join us at ted cruz.org and we, the people, can turn this nation around. [applause] moderator: senator marco rubio. >> ours, the story of america is an extraordinary story. it is the story of a nation that for over two centuries each generation left the next better off than themselves. but now because washington is out of touch for the fault of both political parties, for the first time in our history that is in doubt. that is what this election must
11:15 pm
be about, because if the next four years are like the last eight years, our children will be the first americans worse off than their parents, this election is about making a different choice, applying principles of limited government and free enterprise to the issues of our time. if we do, we will not save the american dream, we will expand it to reach more people and the 21st century can be a new century, i ask you for your vote and ask you to join us at my website, marco rubio.com. [applause] moderator: he's funny. dr. ben carson. >> in the two hours of this debate, five people have died from drug related deaths. $100 million has been added to our national debt. 200 babies have been killed by abortionists, and 2 veterans
11:16 pm
have taken their lives out of despair. this is a narrative that we can change, not we the democrats, not we the republicans, but we the people of america because there is something special about this nation, and we must embrace it and be proud of it and never give it away for the sake of political correctness. [applause] moderator: donald trump? >> thank you. over the years i've created tens of thousands of jobs, and a great company. it's a company i'm very proud of. some of the most iconic assets, anywhere in the world. and i will tell you i don't have to give you a website because i'm self-funding my campaign. i'm putting up my own money. i want to do something really special. i want to make our country greater than it's ever been, i think we have the potential. we cannot lose this election, we cannot let hillary clinton, who is the worst secretary of state in the history of our
11:17 pm
country win this election. we will fight. we will win. we truly will make this even more special. we have to make it better than ever before, and i will tell you, the united states can actually be better than ever before. thank you. [applause] moderator: candidates, we want to thank you all. we also appreciate your helping save time by talking over one another at times. that was welcome. by all means, it was a very riveting debate. business issues can be riveting. because it wasn't about us, it's about them. >> thank you. moderator: that will do it. thank you for joining us. [applause] . >> the final debate of this debate night on the fox business network. this, the fourth in a series of republican debates, and joining
11:18 pm
me now to give us their views and thoughts on the candidates' performance in this debate, and as neil said it was about business, it was about economics and it was about the issues throughout. and substantively so. fox news digital politics editor chris stirewalt with us, fox business senior correspondent charlie gasparino, and the moderator of tonight's first debate, trish regan. good to have you all here. an extraordinary, more than two hours here at the milwaukee theatre. chris, did the candidates deliver? >> i think some of them definitely delivered. i think ben carson delivered in a big way. i think he not only put to rest the questions that have been dogging him from the press this week, but showed more energy. showed more vivacity and commandive issues. it was not deep and wide, but on some issues he showed greater command. i think he was the class of the field and had a great night. >> charlie?
11:19 pm
>> marco rubio had a good debate. on points he probably won. i think ben carson did well. i was astounded how incoherent john kasich and jeb bush were on banking issues. i know a lot about banks, covered them a long time. they didn't cut through. and i think for jeb, this debate did not do him any good. he was a few points i thought he scored. made good points few parts of the debate. i don't think he did well enough to put himself back in the race in a major way. i think that rubio will now being the establishment candidate of choice. >> trish, your thoughts on the second debate, which you got to watch and listen without your moderator responsibilities? >> makes a good point on marco rubio, and i think you're going to see a the love the traditional backing that would have gone to jeb bush, switching over increasingly so to rubio. he talked a lot about the importance of national security
11:20 pm
from an economic standpoint which i think is an important thing that really does resonate right now, because we're looking at economic malaise, we're looking at an increasingly weaker position internationally, and the two are linked, and he made the point to rand paul that in order to be a strong country economically, you've got to be a strong country internationally. >> do you know of all the candidates out there, two worked for banks, kasich and jeb bush. think about that. the two guys who worked for banks, could you figure out what the hell they were talking about? >> well, i think a lot of people are trying to figure out what all of the candidates were stating and implying. i want to say very quickly to the audience at home as we were talking about the night's debate. the noise that you hear some of the members of the audience spilling out into the rotunda to consider further their view of what happened and the
11:21 pm
candidates preparing to the spin room, who has the best argument, chris, in the spin room for his or her performance. by the way, speaking of her, specifically, fiorina? >> if i had to pick a second place in terms of doing what they needed to do for the evening, it would be fiorina. she did a great job. i think she was tough, but not too nettlesome with trump. dealt with him in a good way. >> you could tell she wanted to be? >> there was more, there was more in the charge than just the buckshot she had in there. she gave it to him and did well, and i think that trump overall by being more mannerly, by saying nice things about fellow republicans, this marks the pivot for him, from a nontraditional human twitter feed into a more of a traditional candidate. he did himself a good turn. >> i personally liked donald, i say this before i take a shot at him.
11:22 pm
>> did you learn that from the donald himself? >> when it comes to substantive issues, do we hear him speak? no. if i was looking at a candidate that was both presidential and substantive, had to be rubio. i mean he came across like he knew what he was talking about and seemed confident. >> the one thing donald trump has going for him is a successful career in business. all the politicians can't get a deal done, but i can. >> i think you're right. he does have that advantage, he can play from from a different, if you will, a different level. i'm told that our colleague, neil cavuto, is now -- there you are, neil! great to see you. and let me be the first to congratulate you. just finishing moderating tonight's second debate. you're in the spin room. >> you got it. >> are you happy with the debate?
11:23 pm
>> well, you know, too close to the fire, lou. obviously we wanted to make sure that the candidates had their say. take it from a guy who wears makeup, lou. it wasn't about me. it was about the candidates, including this fellow next to me who shares the lead in this presidential race among republicans. dr. ben carson, very good to have you. >> well, can i say the candidates were very happy with you guys. neil: you did a great job, tough issues, and you saved a lot of time talking over one another, that could have been problematic. how do you think when it comes to business economic issues, the rap against you, doctor, you don't know this field, you don't know the political slings and arrows and can't mix it up on these issues. how do you think you did? >> there wasn't anything that was said tonight that i'm not 100% familiar with and ready to discuss. so i feel good about it, i feel
11:24 pm
good about the answers they was able to give. i would have loved to have gone into more depth, particularly talking about how do you spare on the economy. at least i was able to get into the effect of regulatory reform or excessive regulation, and the impact that it has. you know, i wanted to talk a little bit more about fed policy and what should be done there. how we really need to have a more responsible type of monetary policy. and janet yellen is a wonderful person. i've known her for many years. neil: but i take it from what came a popular theme, you would not necessarily be reappointing her if you became president of the united states? >> well, i'm not necessarily even saying that. neil: oh, really? so you'd consider it. >> i'm not saying one way or the other. what i am saying is we need to have a central bank that
11:25 pm
understands that we have to have responsible predictable policy, which means we're going to have to somehow tie our currency to something. neil: could you get back to something that almost all of you took up though you didn't get much of a chance on the issue if a bank of america is the brink, doctor, ted cruz more or less said that's it, good-bye, good-bye. would a president carson allow that? >> i do not believe in government intervention in a capitalist society. neil: so you'd let it go? >> i believe in setting up mechanisms that will warn people that we're not going through that, but quite frankly, if we had allowed, you know, some of the banks to fail the last time around, there were a number of second tier banks that have done things quite effectively. neil: no doubt.
11:26 pm
that was a very good point. what startled some, and maybe there's a rationale for this, is that we still really have too big to fail, that still exists, so the bank of america is on the brink, doctor, and for whatever reason, it would be on the brink, that millions of depositors would essentially be told, well, that's the breaks. >> the way i think about things is not a or b. i always bring in c. neil: times awasting, in a meltdown situation like 2008, you don't have a lot of time. >> a lot of options like allowing the depositors to shift to the next level of banks so that they don't lose their money, but the bank that is doing things inappropriately suffers the consequences of doing things inappropriately. neil: do you think, doctor, with all the brouhaha over what you wrote and said, that that's
11:27 pm
behind you or more scrutiny because of your position in the polls maybe you haven't adequately answered all this, or is this done with you? >> i can control that. i can simply say, people, look, coach up on the lake. can i sit there and answer a question a day from now until the election or we can deal with appropriate things. if you find a real big scandal, e in deal with that, but did the 10th grade and did do you this? forget about it. just go jump in the lake. neil: there are other stronger terms you could use, dr. ben carson, thank you very much. great night. >> it's a pleasure. neil: we'll hear from some of the other candidates in the process, suffice it to say for the candidates the whole idea was to give them a chance to talk about the economic issues that matter to them. this fellow responding to those issues is next. you're watching fox business,
11:28 pm
where we mean business, and it's the little things in life that make me smile. spending the day with my niece. i don't use super poligrip for hold, because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well fitting dentures let in food particles. just a few dabs of super poligrip free is clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food particles out. try super poligrip free. you both have a perfectperfect. record. no tickets, no accidents... that is until one of you clips a food truck ruining your perfect record. yeah. now you would think your insurance company would cut you some slack, right? no, your insurance rates go through the roof. your perfect record doesn't get you anything. anything. perfect. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.
11:29 pm
help individualize our cancer treatment? now through advanced genomic testing, we may be able to pinpoint and diagnose what makes your cancer different, which can reveal precise treatment options that were not considered previously. with this important breakthrough at the intersection of science and technology, we've arrived at precision cancer treatment. the evolution of cancer care is here at cancer treatment centers of america. call or visit cancercenter.com to learn more about precision cancer treatment.
11:30 pm
>> we're a country of laws, we need borders, we'll have a wall. neil: all right we will have a wall, one of the more popular comes donald trump made with a huge reaction. by and large, popularity of donald trump atop republican presidential field, for how long that lasts? a cynic said it would not last more than a week, we're 5 months into it donald trump joining us now. >> thank you, neil. neil: how do you think you surstrive jived? >> we have storied that of my best, i have a great time, we had three very talented people
11:31 pm
there asking questions, i said, someone asked, how was it, elegant, you did an elegant job. neil: thank you. we said from the beginning. it is not about us, but we want to facilitate the business debate, and get to the issue that are important to you, a couple of things came up, one that i notice is more stylistic. you allowed some of the others to mix it up, get nasty with each other. you held off, i was watching you. you would not engage in, that i wondered why? >> i'm becoming very diplomatic, you are teaching my that. we mixed it up a little bit, but i don't like doing that when somebody cuts someone else off. neil: you made me mention with that with carly fiorina. >> i thought she was fine, a lot of people were being cut off, she was fine. but i thought that maybe
11:32 pm
somebody should speak up. neil: i was watching you, there were a couple of points, we knee knew we are to about to -- others would jump in. >> i of raising my hand. neil: like a catholic grade school. >> it did you not work as well as jumping in. neil: you know, do you worry, any time one of these debates, the fear seems to be this is one they will jar him, they will get him off course, and off note off his stump speech. do you feel anyone did that to you tonight? do you think when polls come out, your lead will be safe? >> well people say i won debate, i don't know if i did. but i think i did well. i enjoyed it, the polls say that too. neil: than just your family.
11:33 pm
>> i really liked it, i enjoyed it, you did a fantastic job, you were fair, that did not surprise me with the three of you, you were fair and professional and after that last catastrophy you did a great job. neil: let me ask you about where you go now, we're more than 80 days away from iowa. you poll very well there you poll very well in new hampshire, but everyone i talk to in political community said, this guy can't win. highe can't stay on top, they have been saying it for months now, i am wondering what are they getting wrong, what you remind them they are getting wrong, i don't know tonight, i did notice you not barging and raising your hand. >> i am a calm person 92 that is a shift in strategy from old donald trump, i am wondering are you trying to be presidential? >> i don't think i'm trying to be, i went to an ivy league
11:34 pm
school, i was a school student, i have so-called pedigree, but the truth is tonight, i thought it was a wonderful debate, i thought they were let's good question no fantasy football questions, i thought of it a fantastic evening, i am leaving after this interview, i am going to new hampshire. and i am doing something tomorrow morning in new hampshire, i thought it was a special evening actually. neil: did you get a chance to see first debate? >> i did. neil: and -- >> i did. neil: chris christie, very well, people say he is moving back up. >> i hope he does, he is a friend of mine, i hope he gets back up. neil: and lindsey graham, he is mad he did not maybe the cut. >> it is too bad, he is a nice guy, he has been going at it a little bit with me, i understand, that he is a good man, a man of talent, i would like to see him get back also. neil: would you consider him a running mate.
11:35 pm
>> too early, i want to win first, i don't want to talk about running mates. neil: is there anyone you would rule out? >> i doifn wan don't want to rule out. >> some are not high the on list but there are some very talented people on the stage, a lot of good, talent the people, i have made some good friends doing this i made pretty good friends out of this group of people. neil: janet yellen's name came up about whether she should be reactor pain at federal reserve, you were critical, saying she has a understood pack with president. >> she is politico. neil: you would not. >> very unlikely 9. neil: it raised some eyebrows, when you said she does barack obama's bidding. >> she political, she is not suppose to be to political. so that is the way i think it is working.
11:36 pm
neil: all right, donald trump, have you a busy schedule, he leads this field, i can't say all of the people who said it, this race ensued, a week maybe to, bubble would burst, not bursting, in almost every state poll, national poll, he either is the lead or shares the lead. i don't know whether that is a consensus that professionals have to reassess or his slightly more presidential performance today is indicates he is growing into something else, we don't know, still too early, you are watching continued post debate coverage now on fox business, where we're proud to discuss business, and just business. many people clean their dentures
11:37 pm
11:38 pm
with toothpaste or plain water. and even though their dentures look clean, in reality they're not. if a denture were to be put under a microscope, we can see all the bacteria that still exists on the denture, and that bacteria multiplies very rapidly. that's why dentists recommend cleaning with polident everyday. polident's unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day.
11:39 pm
11:40 pm
11:41 pm
>> mr. trump fancies himself a very good negotiator, i accept he has done a lot of good dealing, he ought to know we should not speak to people from a position of weakness issue senator paul should know that as well, a reason that i said i would not talk with vladimir putin right now, i have met him as lcial well, not in a green room for a show but in a private meeting. neil: i think they call that a zinger. carly fiorina with us. you were trying to say -- i
11:42 pm
know hard for you to hear, you kind of zinged donald trump on this meeting in a green room with vladimir putin but have you private meetings with the russian leader, it came back to this idea you don't think talks are constructive. we had a lot of talks with vladimir putin over the years. we have warn out our welcome they have warn out theirs. >> the gest is that we've been talking with vladimir putin a lot, most of the time he has been lying to our face, right before russia went into syria we were having talks with vladimir putin, obama, and kerry tacked to him, instead of telling them his plans, he had a general march 2 an office in iraq, deliver a demarche, he feel like talk is
11:43 pm
cheap, he does not pay attention to what we say and way, when you are in a negotiation, you need to negotiate from a position of strength. and so we need to rebuild our strength, in vladimir putin's eyes, by taking actions that will push back on his growing adversarial role. neil: do you think that a president, fiorina would be tempting war. >> i don't think we're techin tempting war when we strong, we tempting war when we're weak, when we're not leading, the world is a more dangerous and tragic place right now because president obama has not led, because hillary clinton thought she could change vladimir putin's mind with a gimmicks rereset button, look how well, that worked, we have not pushed back on our adversaries and not stood with our ally, our allies lose courage and our
11:44 pm
adversaries press forward, the world is a more dangerous place when we are weak, and a safer place whe when we are strong. neil: we were talking about how much we spend on defense we learned that we helped to build a gas station in afghanistan, there is waste in pentagon. >> of course. neil: donald trump wanted to beat that budget up, a lot of your colleagues up there tonight wanted to beef it up, but surely, there is room to opportunity? >> in defense department, i -- defense secretary there is tooth to tail ratio, two to tail ratios that are measured are as bad as they have ever been, we have to invest in tooth, and reform tail, the
11:45 pm
pentagon is a huge bureaucracy as well, there is a lot of opportunity for reform, why we have to go to zero base budgeting and where every dollar is being spent to cut any dollar, move any dollar, and exam inevery dollar. neil: do you think that now, this discussion that people got into, about the fed -- federal reserve chairman janet yelyellen all of a sudden, donald trump was telling me what he said last week. that she is following orders from the white house to keep interest rates low, to essentially help a democrat get elected, do you believe that. >> well , here is what i be reserve chairman and governor has been a. by obama, because of their dual mandate, full empl employment.
11:46 pm
somehow the employment rate is not good enough, they keep the zero interest rate policy that helps rich, harms middle class, harms people who are trying to save there is no doubt, i don't know the cause but the effect to to be helpful to obama but it is not helping, the people who need the help. neil: now that we have an employment report that surprised people to the is up side, the thinking seems to be that will raise rates next month, if that the case, you know how it goes be rarely one hike and they are done. since you have been a critic of the fed, maybe propping up the markets and the recovery, wouldn't you welcome that? >> i would but i'm going to make a bet with you, they don't do it. neil: really. >> i made that bet over and over. neil: why. >> and won, something always changes their mind, we had so many times where jobs report
11:47 pm
is strong could then weak. truth is last jobs report was strong but two previous were weak. i might be wrong but i am going to bet. now thigh will say that imf said that global economy is slowing down there is too much danger. my bet is they are not doing anything until after the election. neil: where do your travels take you to now. >> i am going to indiana and nebraska, iowa and florida before saturday night. neil: incredible, all right, how are you feeling. >> i feel great. neil: very good. well-known cancer survivor, she has more energy than a lot of folk, all right carly fiorina thank you, safe travels. >> thank you. neil: we're in the spin room, very clearly. on a night that a lot of stated their case.
11:48 pm
tracking surveys, and verbal reports and tweets. here is what means everything to us. we kept it to business. take it from a guy who wears make-up, it was not about the guy who wears make-up, we were not a factor, they were, meet them, next. so what about that stock? sure thing, right? actually, knowing the kind of risk that you're comfortable with, i'd steer clear. really? really. straight talk. now based on your strategy i do have some other thoughts... multiplied by 13,000 financial advisors it's a big deal. and it's how edward jones makes sense of investing.
11:49 pm
11:50 pm
11:51 pm
>> i have a plan that would not only cut taxes, lowe erin rates for individuals, also a plan of anybody here to get us to a planned think about by the end of a second term.
11:52 pm
neil: john kasich, ohio governor. here is what i love about the governor, whether you like him or not, if he feels he is not being called on or slighted, he will let you know, if you don't call on him, he call on himself, sort of like an american-italian quality, looking for that lineage. >> how about croatia. neil: oh, yeah. one of more remarkable echanges in the night what would you do if we had a bank fail? some say it would never happen. ted cruz said, if it were to happen, he would not rescue a bank of america, that is what hillary clinton said. you step back say think about what you are saying, you tell millions of depositors through
11:53 pm
no fault of their owner caught up in this whirl wind, and you would let them go? you didn't like that. >> look the investors ought to lose but the depositors are simple people who have nothing to do with that. neil: that was the premise for the bailout last time. >> i'm saying, i think we can put many thins in place that would prevent a lot of what happened. but if the question is, could it happen against? it is it might. and then what -- >> what did you think of governor bush saying it is not going to happen. >> you can never say it not. if we take a lot of steps issue we cure some of the problem that created this financial crisis, i think that will help, but you can never say something is never going to happen. but neil, when you are an executive you have to is a down and figure out the best way to get's positive solution for everyone, you can't just do it on ideology, i'm saying that --
11:54 pm
>> that is where your critic say, he motte , he is is not a conservative. >> i am a conservative. you don't want to let the people who play by the rules get the shaft, let's say, we put rules and regulations but force the dig banks to set aside money based on their risk -- >> let's say they have been doing that, here is what i think. i covered this time of the meltdown, it was happen s quickly in fast market conditions. it was rapidly being depleted then, all capital in world in middle of a freefall is you know, you can't control that so now we're back to something like that, god forbid happens again could you are president. what do you do? >> you sit with your best team
11:55 pm
in a room you say, is there a way out of this where we cannot are all of these folks the depositors get clobbered. okay, but what do we do? what is happening? i don't think it just comes you on right away, there were a lot of signs neil on issue of a bubble, now, let me tell you that, i had to let a plant close in ohio, a aluminum plant there is no way i could see they could make money, they could not be profitable, i fell terrible about that decision to not to continue let them operate, i sent people in to help employees,s some arsometimes you have to, but you can't just, what is the case? or situation, it's easy to run for president make a lod of dey -- declarative statements, but i actually want to be president and fix the country. we had a lot about taxes
11:56 pm
tonight. you cannot be proposing a 10% flat tax and say you can plan a budget in 4 years, i don't know how you could do that. i have written more basketballs than all of the -- budgets than all of the people. neil: you balance it after your second term. >> in 7 or 8 year, maybe faster if you get economic growth. neil: assuming you get a shot av second term. >> you know the kind of president i'm going to be, i'll be is your show every week, you are so popular. i might not have an opponent when i run 92 you never know. john kasich thank you very much. >> neil you did a fantastic jock all of the moderators did. neil: thank you very much, john kasich, governor of ohio. john kasich, governor of ohio. and he reminded me of that if you're an adult with type 2 diabetes and your a1c is not at goal
11:57 pm
with certain diabetes pills or daily insulin, your doctor may be talking about adding medication to help lower your a1c. ask your doctor if adding once-a-week tanzeum is right for you. once-a-week tanzeum is an injectable prescription medicine that may improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes, along with diet and exercise. once-a-week tanzeum works by helping your body release its own natural insulin when it's needed. tanzeum is not recommended as the first medicine to treat diabetes or in people with severe stomach or intestinal problems. tanzeum is not insulin. it is not used to treat type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis, and has not been studied with mealtime insulin. do not take tanzeum if you or your family have a history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you're allergic to tanzeum or any of its ingredients. stop using tanzeum and call your doctor right away if you experience symptoms of a serious allergic reaction which may include itching, rash, or difficulty breathing; if you have signs of pancreatitis,
11:58 pm
such as severe stomach pain that will not go away and may move to your back, with or without vomiting; or if you have symptoms of thyroid cancer which include a lump or swelling in your neck, hoarseness, trouble swallowing, or shortness of breath. before using tanzeum, talk to your doctor about your medical conditions, all medicines you're taking, if you're nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant. and about low blood sugar and how to manage it. taking tanzeum with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects with tanzeum include diarrhea, nausea, injection site reactions, cough, back pain, and cold or flu symptoms. some serious side effects can lead to dehydration which may cause kidney failure. ask your doctor if adding once-a-week tanzeum is right for you. go to tanzeum.com to learn if you may be eligible to receive tanzeum free for 12 months. make every week a tanzeum week.
11:59 pm
glad i could help you plan for your retirement. alright, kelly and promise me that you'll try that taco place on south street. and we have portfolio planning tools to help you manage your ira. yeah, you're old 401k give me your phone. the rollover consultants give you step-by-step help. no set-up fees. use your potion. sorry, not you. my pleasure. goodnight, tim. for all the confidence you need. who's tim? td ameritrade. you got this.
12:00 am
r time life's video collection. (doorbell chiming) oh, hey, hi, dean. hey, hi there, uh... bob. (narrator) from the battlefield to the white house, from hollywood to the heartland, america's entertainer was bob hope. oh, this room, it's so dull and depressing tonight. if only there was some way to brighten it. oh, of course. (laughter) (narrator) he was a true patriot. (bob hope) this has been a great trip.

50 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on