tv Your World With Neil Cavuto FOX News July 17, 2013 1:00pm-2:01pm PDT
born and kanye and your three and royal mum. >> the dow did fine today. world from neil cavuto right now boston bombing victim didn't have a chance to run for cover and now the accused terrorist who pulled off the attack is on this cover. ♪ >> eric: i'm eric boling and this is your world. across the country, the outrage is building over this cover. refusing to sell the bomber issue and maybe because of this. >> he did a terrible thing. you know i at this think it's despicable they would put them on there. >> why would you publicize this guy. he is absolute terror have
the. >> to have a national tragedy like that and like he is james franco it seems jeep cheap to me. >> encouraging by putting on the cover of rolling stone. >> they made him look like a rock star. made him look like you want to be, not someone who did something awful to america. >> eric: molly with the reaction there and what are they saying now? >> the reaction in boston has been fierce. we're on boyleston street. it was easy to find people that had negative feelings and twitter verse on fire. there are numerous things all over the web an on routinely petition a friend of jeff bowman. he lost both his names during
that bombing. and pictures of him were broadcast all around the world. in a letter that was written in this petition to john winters who is the rolling stone founder to get this magazine to remove the cover photo. here is what the petition says. we have lost family and friends. we have lost limbs and suffered life altering injuries. we have forever lost our sense of security. we lost as eight-year-old child. all at the hands of your cover boy. that is from katlyn knox town send. here are some pretty strong emotions. >> i believe it's not the right place for that type of article to be placed in entertainment magazine. it's giving him more publicity than needed. >> those are people in public eye and doing good things. he didn't do good things, did
he? >> and rock stars and not people like tsarnaev. >> reporter: rolling stone has responded saying the factor that dzhokar tsarnaev is young and in the same age group as many of our readers makes it all the more important to examine the complexities of the issues and to gain understanding how it happened. here on the streets of boston, not a lot of happy people in response to this magazine article. >> eric: thanks, molly. new york as well, i'll pointed that out. to the business backlash, walgreen's and wal-mart are refusing to sell the issue. tedesky food shops joins us, owner joins us now. when you saw the cover right here for the first time, what went through your mind? >> it seemed grossly
inappropriate. i don't think it wouldly anywhere in this country but particularly right here where so many people were grossly affected by these actions. i wasn't pretend to know what went into the thought process behind it. >> eric: how about your customers, have you spoken to them? >> sure. when we started, it came in this morning, we had a lot of feedback, via website and voice messages from customers and some of our employees that expressed outrage that we actually sell rolling stone and this was going to be the cover for the upcoming edition. we gotten the feedback live. the more we started to think about it, the more we felt it was incumbent upon us to take action and to remove them. in all fairness, we tell them in 60 of 200 stores. one of our stores are located between the two blast sites.
we have employees that were fortunately not hurt but certainly affected and lots of customers that will carry scars with normal a long time. some would argue this is appraisal about censorship, but not at all. it's about the people that were impacted. >> eric: i can't imagine having this cover in a store that was located in the middle of the two stores. it's kind of glorifying this bombing suspect. >> absolutely. i mean, look at right after the incident happened we were working with homeland security and we had video inside and outside the store. you have to believe the scars will a last for quite a long time as well as many first responders that were so heroic to help out the people that lost limbs and lost loved ones. so it just seems grossly
inappropriate. you would have something like this. when you think about it, ask a simple question: do you think they would like to have their picture on cover of rolling stone? sure i think it would be flattering. that is great. that makes it grossly inappropriate. >> eric: and i wonder if adults talk to their children, kids that look at the magazine, i want to be a rock star too dad. if i can't be rock star, maybe i can be a cover of rolling stone by doing something bad like that. >> yeah, absolutely. there has been an edge. rolling stone has been a fine plubl e publication. they like to be edgy. in this case unfortunately it seems like they crossed line. for some parents who may receive it via mail they are going to have some explaining to do. particularly in in part of the country, near sort of where this transpired.
>> eric: i have to tell you, very sensitive in that part of the country, sensitivity goes across the whole country. we are hearing from people who are outraged that rolling stone would do this. let me ask you this. rolling stone, they do a lot of investigative reporting and if they were to change the cover, i would be okay with it? >> i've been asked that question and unfortunately i wasn't given the opportunity to make that decision. i really can't answer. probably not because what transpired. i don't no about you, i'm sure you wouldn't want to be represented this way. to write about the tragedy, learning lesson, but to publicize it where you put him on the cover, i'm not sure there is any picture that i would feel good about. >> eric: peter tedeschi thank you very much.
>> to eric who says the rolling stone cover is glorifying terror. author of a new book. we'll talk about your book in a second. with we saw this cover we have to talk about this. glorifying terror, what do you mean? >> they have a young jihadist on the cover of rolling stone the terrorist version like she james dean. this goes with the whole pattern of mainstream media since this boston bopping. they called the younger brother, just a misguided american kid. live news for mainstream media, he was 19-year-old young man who knew exactly what he was doing who was fully in control of his faculties who killed four people, wounded 260 more. only time she had you had have a picture on cover is in handcuffs.
>> eric: let's talk about this. we printed -- we had an advance copy on some of the inside of the magazine. i have a problem with this. there you go. we are highlighting, how popular promising student was failed by his family became a monster. they are making every single excuse for this terrorist? >> he was just a wild and crazy kid who got off on the wrong path. "new york times" did the same thing a week after the boston bombing with the older brother, they said he traveled into terrorism because of his failed boxing career. left always have to make an excuse for the enemies. at the end of the day, how did this promising young manning so wrong. i have one word for you, eric -- jihad. maybe they should investigate it and find out the true
motivation of the tsarnaev brothers. >> covers sell magazines. it looks alarmingly similar to jim morrison and bob dylan. they are there out for this outrage factor. >> yeah, it's intentionally provocative. a point about the tsarnaev brothers, in my book i document how they worshipped at a boston mosque which is controlled by, surprise, surprise, a muslim brotherhood linked group. now, we know, of course, the mainstream media has been a big fan of the muslim brotherhood since arab spring. so with a radical ideology like the brotherhood it's no surprised they would worship at the mosque frequented by the brotherhood. >> eric: there is number two in al-qaeda was confirmed but
can't? >> it's a good thing, al-qaeda contrary to what president obama says, is not on the run in nearing defeat. they are actually expanding geographically. still very dangerous. as offshoots favorite cover by the tsarnaevs. >> it's called brotherhood, america's next great enemy. thank you very much. >> eric: you are looking live the house floor where we could be minutes away from a voted on healthcare delays. republicans want to know if the president can delay key parts of the law, why can't they? michele bachmann is one of them and she is next. mine was earned in djibouti, africa. 2004. vietnam in 1972. [ all ] fort benning, georgia in 1999. [ male announcer ] usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protection
and because usaa's commitment to serve military members, veterans, and their families is without equal. begin your legacy, get an auto insurance quote. usaa. we know what it means to serve. happy birthday! it's a painting easel! the tide's coming in! this is my favorite one. it's upside down. oh, sorry. (woman vo) it takes him places he's always wanted to go. that's why we bought a subaru. (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.
nation in grips of a brutal heat wave to the meltdown in this place, washington, d.c., mandated and individual mandates coming in a matter of hours and republicans are renewing fire on the president's healthcare law. >> yes or no, was there a discussion on the individual mandate? >> congressman, as the employer responsibility provision transition relief.... >> was there a discussion on the individual mandate because you said there was quite a discussion on the employer mandate. was there a discussion on the individual mandate, a yes or no, sir. very easy question. >> eric: the president is vowing anything to delay the law. michele bachmann, why after all the president was first to do it. go ahead, do you want to explain? >> there is bewildering to people. if the president thought it was such a great idea he delayed the employer mandate
for one year why wouldn't he want to see the correct thing to have congress pass the law to do exactly that? after all the president is standing up for big business now and worries that big business has. he is not standing up for small business. he was not standing up for the individual mandate. that is what we're seeing in the house. it's good enough to delay individual mandate for obamacare for one year. why shouldn't it be good for the little guy? the little guy's big and workers and little guys that work in business. we think it is and that is why in the house later today we're going to take that vote because we believe the little guys all across america have the right to be treated equally together. >> eric: congresswoman, the unions are saying, wait a minute, this isn't all that was cracked up to be. the fact that james hoffa junior says i don't like it either.
do you have any think you would be on the same side of jimmy hoffa? >> i read that letter from james hoffa. he wrote it to harry reid and nancy pelosi. president said if we liked our healthcare, we could keep it. so he has infamous remarks he is saying look, we are losing jobs here in america. we are seeing what was normally the 40-hour workweek now being reduced to the 30 hour workweek because of obamacare. our workers can't live on it. we are losing our healthcare. then he gives a quid pro quo. james hoffa says we put boolts on the ground for you to help you. you promised us this healthcare thing was going to work. if not, we're screaming to get your attention. you better start listening to us. in other words, james hoffa is threatening the political option that they may not be there in 2014 foreopponent.
it's very clear no one likes obamacare. >> eric: locking arms in solidarity with hoffa. and -- i'm sorry. listen how explains pushing back on obamacare. >> republicans and house of representatives to the tune of $50 million have cost the taxpayers time, money and taxpayer money in trying to repeal the health security law that was passed in 2010. >> this week we'll spend thousands and thousands of taxpayer dollars to do a bill that will go nowhere and simply is food for the tea party extremists in our country who want to see this done. >> eric: congresswoman, he is saying we're going to spend thousands and thousands of dollars and blames the tea party? >> it's my bill to repeal
obamacare. we have crossed it two times on the house floor. it's never gotten on the senate floor and never gotten on the president's desk. small businesses, real americans and even the teamsters union would love it if my bill could get on the president's desk. everyone wants it gone. why? because it will cost the american people trillions of dollars to comply with it. what is worse, it is going to cost jobs. in the last two years, small businesses haven't even hired less than 20% of small businesses have even hired primarily due to the obamacare bill. in the next two years, less than 20% of small businesses intend to hire. this is disaster. >> eric: the f.b.i. announced a sting operation. they caught one of your staffers, can you tell us what happened? >> we don't comment on personal matters. you would have to talk to
capital police about that. what we are focused on repealing obamacare. that is good for jobs and benefit packages and that is good for the american economy. >> eric: we will leave it there. congresswoman, thanks for joining us. wait until you hear how the government is tracking your every move in your car. get ready to see the judge from zero to 60. ♪ ♪ life in the fast lane ♪ life in the fast lane ♪ ♪ e, sir i'm gonna have to ask you to power down your little word game. i think your friends will understand. oh...no, it's actually my geico app...see? ...i just uh paid my bill. did you really? from the plane? yeah, i can manage my policy, get roadside assistance, pretty much access geico 24/7. sounds a little too good to be true sir. i'll believe that when pigs fly. ok, did she seriously just say that? geico. just a click away with our free mobile app.
[ herbie ] there's no doubt about it brent, a real gate keeper. here's kevin, the new boyfriend. lamb to the slaughter. that's right brent. mom's baked cookies but he'll be lucky to make it inside. and here's the play. oh dad did not see this coming. [ crowd cheering ] now if kevin can just seize the opportunity. it's looking good, herbie. he's seen it. it's all over. nothing but daylight. yes i'd love a cookie. [ male announcer ] make a powerful first impression. the all-new nissan sentra. ♪
of digital records on the location and movement of every license plate. is this legal? >> boy oh boy, what now. >> if you look at the big picture, it seems like a she is dropping every day. it's dropping in favor of the government doing things too us that we didn't know about because it's easier for the government to keep control on things when it monitors us. it seems as if the government will cut any corner and any hole in the constitution in order to make its job easier. i am -- i'm not surprised by this. >> eric: what are they doing. if the government wants to track where your car goes by accessing your gps or following your cellphone in your pocket or front seat with you. it needs a warrant to do it. under the present state of law, if the government wants to take a picture of your car every place it goes, which has the same function as
following your gps device, it doesn't need a warrant to do so. the reason it doesn't need a warrant to do so is twofold. the license plate is public so the government takes the position you have no right to privacy and you a don't expect deprive so i your license plate. the other reason the government has not introduced evidence in court in prosecuting someone for photographs of these cars son has challenged it of. -- no one has challenged it. it's called suspicion. something the police can articulate why they need to follow the car. if we let the police willy-nilly follow us wherever we go we will be like east germany. >> eric: nsa had been data mining us, they can look back and find out what we were saying. isn't this the same thing? >> yes, it is. it is local police picking up
on what the feds could get away with. this is why it was profoundly wrong for federal judges on fisa court saying to verdicts give us all the phone records and data of 113 million people. they are looking for a phone call that eric boling had with someone in the middle or andrew napolitano had with the middle east. they can look at the records but why do you need the records of 113 million people. constitution says they have to particularize what they want. they can't run a dragnet. >> eric: we have just about a minute. there are things in use where they can videotape a section of a city. they can take it and put the videotape away and if something happens in that city they can go band ago take a look, they can read the time on my watch. is that legal? >> senator rand paul is holding up the nomination for
the f.b.i. until his predecessor robert mueller. they haven't written laws about that and we need to know the people that we hire to keep us safe are doing. >> what are they doing with the information. that is what we need to know. i love this topic. we see eye to eye. >> yes, we do. >> eric: they survived but not just the pilot. try the plane maker, too. my name is mike and i quit smoking.
chantix... it's a non-nicotine pill. i didn't want nicotine to give up nicotine. [ male announcer ] along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. [ mike ] when i was taking the chantix, it reduced the urge to smoke. [ malennouncer ] some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these, stop taking chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of depression or other mental health problems, which could get worse while taking chantix. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these, stop taking chantix and see your doctor right away as some can be life-threatening. tell your doctor if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems, or if you develop new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away if y have symptoms of a heart attack or stroke. use caution when driving or operating machinery. common side effects include nausea, trouble sleeping and unusual dreams. it feels wonderful. i don't smoke. i don't smoke. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor if chantix is right for you.
and i'm here to tell homeowners that are 62 and older about a great way to live a better retirement. it's called a reverse mortgage. [ male announcer ] call right now to receive your free dvd and booklet with no obligation. it answers questions like how a reverse mortgage works, how much you qualify for, the ways to receive your money, and more. plus, when you call now, you'll get this magnifier with l.e.d. light absolutely free. when you call the experts at one reverse mortgage today, you'll learn the benefits of a government-insured reverse mortgage. it will eliminate your monthly mortgage payments and give you tax-free cash from the equity in your home. and here's the best part -- you still own your home. take control of your retirement today. ♪ ♪
♪ >> eric: from the crash to the courtroom. 83 survivors of the asiana airlines announced their plans to sue both the airlines and plane's manufacturer boeing largely focusing on pilot error. lis wiehl says yes, but tamara says i disrespectfully disagree with. >> you we're in the discovery stage right now. first it was pilot error. now, they are doing more discovery, they are finding it may be the throttle of the plane. it may be the slide function in the emergency slide. so there were people, this was horrible they were stuck in there the emergency slides were stuck. they had to be wrenched out of their seat because the plane didn't work. if that is true and discovery
stage, and boefg should have or could have known, that is negligence and emotional disstress and even wrongful death. >> eric: tough to argue? >> i can try. there are two different possible liability here. there is boeing and the manufacturer and whether the pilots were actually trained. airlines says they are but there are reports maybe they are not. so then you could have a mixture of the two. pilots -- i can't speak, sorry -- spreading the liability. >> it could be the manufacturer or boeing and it could be airline itself. >> eric: let's say it's pilot error. there is no malfunctions and kep that plane find. >> boeing is off the hook. boeing and manufacturer.
again, if the airline knew or should have known that they were putting pilots that didn't have 9 proper training. who were inexperienced and they screwed this up, that is how come people died and the plane went down, then they are liable as are the employer. >> eric: fairly logical but if "a" boeing was plane was fined and "b" they put experienced pilots in the cockpit but they screwed up? >> then asiana is independently liable because of their negligence in the training and putting people behind. >> eric: here is my point, is the pilot themselves? >> no the pilots were acting as agents of asiana airlines. >> true. you can always go after the pilots but that is is not a deep pocket. if found to have the liability you would have boeing, you have the manufacturer and then you have asiana you would have
the individual pilots just to throw them in here. >> other thing that airlines -- pilots don't generally have a lot of money. you want to go after the deep pockets. also, there is no evidence here that the pilots were acting under the influence of drugs or alcohol or something that they weren't supposed to be doing. >> eric: left turn result of these lawsuits, will this change? >> no, i don't think so. i think you could see this coming down this kind of lawsuit was going to happen. any time you have a national tragedy like this where airplanes, buses, trains are involved, then there are lawsuits. my only hope, obviously i would hope that these victims are compensated if there is found to be liability but beyond that, when you do have one of these big cases maybe it doesn't happen again. >> also, i think the public needs to know how trained pilots really are. >> eric: absolutely.
>> you get behind the wheel. >> eric: that is one of the first things you should find out how many hours this pilot has flying this plane. >> what pointed do we stop. do we want to know greyhound bus driver and subway guy? enter your own risk. we'll just stay-at-home. >> eric: we'll leave it there. and breaking news ahead of the irs hearing. we are on it and history of rome sounding too close to home. john stossel explains this one next.
great to have you back on, sir. tell us about it. everything seems to be unraveling, is it? or am i being too optimistic? >> no. you are not being realistic enough. this thing is imploding by the day. now, the only thing about those numbers that you showed, eric, is the administration is in denial. they are not really a surprise to anybody except the administration. i think you even maybe played a clip earlier about jay carney saying -- >> let's take a look at the clip. let's listen to jay carney talking about that. >> if you broadly look at the economic data, the suggestion they are producing full-time employment is belied by the facts. >> now listen to ben bernanke. >> one thing that we hear in the common terry we get, is
that some employers are hiring part time in order to avoid the mandate there. >> eric: tricky thing. >> let's take them one at a time. ben bernanke said in the commentary. you know where it comes from? the business people that sit on the board. i used to be one of them. that is where they say they hear. you are hearing from business people. jay carney said, this belies the facts. all he has to do is look at the chamber survey or look at the bureau of labor statistics which shows that since the beginning of this year, the number of new hires that are full time versus part time, part time are being hired by ratio of three to one. i know jay carney is bids. he needs to get somebody on his staff to look at the numbers that is in the bls
report. he is totally either in denial or they are not looking at the real facts. >> eric: why do you think they decided to try to delay the employer mandate portion of obamacare? >> i think they decided to delay it for two reasons. number one, they didn't have all the implementation steps and implementation structures, the written and ready to roll out like they had hoped to. that is number one. they simply weren't ready. then they weren't ready to track the results if in fact somebody didn't comply. the second reason i believe is that even feedback from some of the democrats will quietly say we have real problems here. here is one example. the senator from minnesota was even talking about the impact of the medical device tax on medical device companies. why? because there are so many medical device manufacturers
in minnesota. >> eric: they can take their tha business anywhere. herman, talk to me about this, it's off the topic a little bit but obamacare in all the regulations that we didn't know until we passed the bill and now we are finding out what is in bill and all the regulations slapped on top of bill, you have to talk about calorie content of your american ui items. pizza chain, what did i hear, 10 or 15 pizzas you have to label them all? >> this is big brother on steroids. when you got to worry about all the labor requirements. when i was head of the restaurant association, we went through a label in sight. we accepted some and that is why you have labeling out there. now, with this administration, they are on regulations on steroids. so now, they are looking at every nook and cranny to try
to force more regulations all across this economy for the impact that it is going to have on the business. >> we're going to label you a great guest. thank you sir. >> eric, i would be happy to be back. >> eric: the nation's debt is nearing $17 trillion. john stossel with at a warning. >> 2,000 years ago, one superpower, rome, dominated the world. it became famous for the military and for having rule of and a stable currency people could rely on. they bought roads, aqua deducts and crusade art and literature. they flourished for 200 years in peace and prosperity. then it crumbled. why? because political leaders grabbed power and that power turned many into tyrants who
indulged in corruption. they raised taxes to pay for war and increased regulation. when the masses complained they tried to please them with handouts. sound familiar? is this what is happening to america? a thousand of us 6 gathered here to debate that question. >> eric: fox business network's john stossel he has an answer. honestly the comparisons are amazing? >> sadly. rome lasted quite a long time compared to us, but the arrogant rulers and currency devaluation. our rulers don't have brothels in the white house and don't execute senator's wives who don't attend orgies but we grow government and we are danger. >> eric: what was the turning point in rome? it goes on in many governments. there is corruption and
politics, powerful people taking more power and trying to buy off the people by giving them stuff. what is the straw? >> the straw in rome's case the barbarians came and burned rome. it really wasn't the barbarians, rome was already collapsing because of its own weight. subsidized grain and olive oil. vast shows in the coliseum. >> eric: that is where we are. trillions of dollars a debt. >> nobody knows what that is and when it goes bad it happens suddenly. one difference, one good e have the tea party movement. one thing is we have a free press and talking back and more awareness of this problem. so we can fight this. >> eric: how? >> by shrinking government or at least slowing its growth.
>> eric: how about this, electing officials that are for smaller government? >> that is easy, but for smaller government they tend not to be. >> eric: that is $64,000. once they are elected. >> they breathe that washington air and you get re-electing re-elected by promising people stuff. >> eric: any good news? >> no. >> eric: john, thank you very much. did the targeting come from the top. ahead of the hearing, republican who says he has the proof today.
office of irs council had a role in the targeting and lois lernr had a hand in the delays. to the house committee chairman and the lawmakers leading into the investigation into the irs and darrell issa. khair man, thank you for joining us. tell us what is going to happen tomorrow? >> it will be essentially a progress reported as we have done interviews in sings national at this and washington we had to prove. people in cincinnati were the first contact they reported to washington. washington reported up the chain. and a 48 year veteran in washington is going to point appropriately to two places we need to go next, to lois lerner to appears to have a hand in it, and to the office ofhe consol,
and little more than three years, no decision was made. >> you are talking about carter hall? >> we are, a long term veteran, expert on 501(c)4s. >> tell us about elizabeth. >> she makes the initial case. we have to get from cincinnati where this began to washington. and we have. we found out that the very first 501(c)4 application went to washington. from the beginning, cincinnati sent it to washington. we're going to see numbers like one, two, ten, 60, then 100 cases, all of them being essentially controlled from washington, d.c., and in this case at least in part from the office of the consol, a political appointment position, one of two in the irs. >> talk about it a little bit.
elizabeth hofbaker is some agent in cincinnati who was part of the process holding back conservative groups' approval process in the 501(c)4s, i believe. above her was carter hall. >> that's right. >> lois lerner, was she above carter hall? >> absolutely. >> what are we doing with lois lerner? >> we intend to have her back. as you know, the committee voted she waived her fifth amendment rights as to the questions we wanted to ask her, when she made extensive statements on the subject and then refused to answer additional questions. that will be a next step. but ultimately it is part of the stumbling in this case. had lois lerner answered our questions truth fully, we could have undoubtedly gotten to the truth of this much sooner. >> so you bring her to the stand, she will likely raise her hand and won't she take the fifth again? >> we have a number of ways to
get this information. we are calling on the irs to free up communications related to this and to make other people available. but at the end of the day, yes. if government employees who continue to be government employees are paid not to talk to us, something is really wrong, as you know. >> wouldn't that be contempt of congress if she does it after you decided she waived her fifth amendment rights when she made her statement, you bring her back, she's sworn in again, you ask her, doesn't she have to testify at that point? >> well, the expectation is she would. her counsel is well aware that she certainly testified and then stopped testifying. contempt is one of the tools we can use. >> okay. elijah cummings, the ranking democrat on the committee, sent you this letter. i am quoting from the letter. rather than describing the whole truth, your letter appears yet to create a skewed account based on partial, incomplete and
cherry picked information while disregarding key evidence that contradicts your political narrative. chairman, will you respond to congressman cummings? >> well, you know, his job is to stop me at every point. he represents the administration and has done their bidding for a number of years now, but we have his witness, russell george, the ig tomorrow, who is going to answer many of the questions he has been making claims on, and we have these witnesses. we want witnesses and their testimony to speak for themselves. yes, both sides are free to put out excerpts from testimony and interpret it. we think we have interpreted fairly. we believe tomorrow's hearing is going to show that people who actually had these applications and who worked up and down the chain make it very clear this was not a cincinnati decision, it wasn't just a washington decision, it was handled at least in part at very high levels, including the chief counsel's office. >> congressman, yesterday we reported that democrats are
trying to kind of point the finger at russell george. your reaction? >> he has been at treasury about 14 years. he has been commended repeatedly for good work he does. many of us would like to see him do his work faster, would like to see sooner reports, but no one has ever questioned before the accuracy of the kind of work his office does, and i might note, standing next to him tomorrow at the hearing will be the former deputy staff director on the democratic side of this committee who worked hand in hand on these reports. so any claim this would be partisan i think would be out of line. this is a nonpartisan organization, and he is a career professional who has been recognized for more than a decade in this position. >> congressman, i have about a minute left. treasury, you mention treasury, irs reports to treasury. are we ever going to see tim geithner on the stand? >> well, we never make predictions of who we're going to see on the stand. we follow the evidence. we will continue to follow the
evidence. as it is becoming clear, the irs scandal, the agency in crisis, whether their procurement, their spending, it is a control of documents, it is choice of vendors. they just chose a vendor who already lost 123,000 social security out of their secure database, that's the new irs control dump of your personal data. these are all areas of concern. as we follow it, we have to follow where it leads and fix it. >> i don't have a lot of time. what about leadership on your side? is there some inside d.c. inside the beltway that maybe leadership is asking you to back off a little. are they? >> not at all. leadership has been extremely supportive. we have a complex problem here. we have to get to the truth, and the irs often stands behind what's called 6103, this idea that they're protecting the 501(c)4s by not disclosing information, in fact, these are the victims. that's frustrating, i am working
with chairman camp in the ways and means committee to get to the truth and get it to the public. >> i have to cut you off. have to leave it there. represent darrell issa. thank you for your time. >> of course. guess what, i'll see you on "the five" in three. to make their money do more. (ann) to help me plan my next move, i take scottrade's free, in-branch seminars... plus, their live webinars. i use daily market commentary to improve my strategy. and my local scottrade office guides my learning every step of the way. because they know i don't trade like everybody. i trade like me. i'm with scottrade. (announcer) scottrade... ranked "highest in customer loyalty for brokerage and investment companies."
of course i had no idea what it was. i felt like my feet were going to sleep. it progressed from there to burning... to like 1,000 bees that were just stinging my feet. [ female announcer ] it's known that diabetes damages nerves. lyrica is fda approved to treat diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is not for everyone. it may cause rious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right ay if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in md or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, changes in eyesight including blurry vision, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or skin sores friabetes. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't ink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you.
hello, i'm kimberly guilfoyle with eric bolling, dana perino, greg gutfeld, and bob beckel. this is "the five." there aren't many americans in this country who don't have an opinion on the verdict in the zimmerman murder trial. everyone, and i mean everyone, is now coming out of the woodwork to share them. >> no mother, no father should ever have to fear for their child walking down a street in the united states of america.