tv The Journal Editorial Report FOX News September 5, 2015 9:30am-10:01am PDT
check out our website at fox news.com/property man. i'm bob massi. i'll see you next time. >> hill res a classified -- a former staffer vows to plead the fifth. plus, with donald trump dominating the political debate, and ben carson and carly fiorina surging in the polls, the panel looks at the rise of the republican outsiders and president obama gets a big boost in his fight to secure the iran nuclear deal. what's next for opponents of the agreement. find out after these headlines. while supporters of -- the defiant county clerk is spending a weekend in jail insisting through her lawyers that same-sex marriage licenses issued by her deputy clerk are
not worth the paper they're written on. we'll have a fair and balanced legal panel coming up. plus, it's -- that storm -- thousands of refugees claim violence in the middle east are in austria after being taken taken through hungary. they said they won't bus them out again. we'll go with the very latest. hillary clinton issues an apology related to hish private e-mail server. it's not what you may think. plus, a report is out that the clintons personally paid a state department employee to maintain that server. now that employee will take the fifth if called to testify. these stories and more are coming up at the top of the hour on america's news headquarters. welcome to the journal. editorial report. i'm paul. new fallout from hillary clinton's use of a private e-mail server with the washington post reporting this
week that the former secretary of state wrote and sent at least six emails that contain classified information. this as two of clinton's top aides testified before the house panel investigating the 2012 terrorist attack in benghazi, and as the former staffer who set up the e-mail server announced he will plead the fifth before that same congressional committee. let's bring in wall street journal columnist and deputy editor dan heninger and james freeman, and editor critical board member mary kissel, host of opinion journal on wsj video. dan, how important is it that significant is it that a former aide has taken the fifth? >> yes. i think it has to be regarded as very significant. certainly not incriminating yourself as constitutionally protected right, we all understand that. when pole tigs start doing it, you begin to wonder what is going on beneath the surface? in this case the week has been very interesting because not only have we had brian taking
the fifth amendment, but we had an extraordinary press conference at the state department in which state spokesman mark tohler said he had no idea who knew about the private e-mail system of hillary clinton or when they found out about it. he was incapable of answering that question. the sense grows that there is something serious going on here. it may be reaching the level of a federal crime for which someone is going to be prosecuted. >> and the original statement that secretary of state made that she sent no classified information over her private e-mails, that is completely collapsed. >> it has. paul, remember, she was careful to s lassfied, but that's besides the point. >> under the law. >> under the law either the information is classified or it isn't, and secretary of state, she has a responsibility to know if that information is classified or not. i think the interesting development this week is that you see the national media finally starting to ask the key question, which is why does
hillary clinton need a private e-mail server? you don't need an e-mail server to have a private e-mail account. >> you are going to have an e-mail account for personal business. for your yoga instructoror. you can second it over g mail. >> the only explanation i can come up with is that she wanted to evade public scrutiny of the e-mail that she was sending. it's the only explanation that makes sense. >> wanted to control the e-mail she was sending as we have learned to the likes of sydney bloomenthal, the moat orus political hitman, who was employed by the clinton foundation. the state department -- the obama administration barred from getting an official position, but it looks like they were communicating secretary of state clinton and syd bloomenthal. he has been barred from the administration. he is basically running an off the grid foreign policy -- working for the clinton foundation. also has other private clients while he is advising hillary
clinton on what to do in various hot spots around the world. all of his potential conflicts have not been vetted, but, again, it undermines her original story. she originally said no classified data. we learned halves classified. we originally heard she was just largely receiving stuff unsolicited. we see her egging on syd bloomenthat will. keep the notes coming. bill loves them. her story has really collapsed. >> we also know that -- we learned this week that the fbi is investigating whether or not foreign intelligence services may have hacked or tapped in otherwise to her private account, which would be a major development and show that she has exposed secrets to outside. >> well, exactly. the state department released hundreds and hundreds of these emails this week, and i have been looking through them. they're fascinating. i mean, some of them are -- they're not quite classified, but they're very, very serious dispatches from ambassadors around the country about the
state of afathers. >> insuit into foreign actors. >> all of this -- then they're the most mundane emails that are just like private events going on in her life. all of this is going through an address hrod17@clinton e-mail.com. it is the most extraordinary thing to see these high level state department emails being sent to that address and her replying to them. look, at the high level military officer of the pentagon were doing this sort of thing, they would be disciplined. that day as soon as anyone found out about it. >> probably fired. >> and probably fired. >> what are the implications here for the democratic campaign? is this going to resonate at all? >> i think it's already resonating in the polls. hillary clinton's steady slide and the rise of bernie sanders. you see that in iowa and elsewhere. paul, you do have to go back to what dan said. was there a crime committed here? there are so many questions that we don't have answered. who had access to this server? was there more lassfied
information? did foreign intelligence agencies have access? also, the clinton foundation. you have aides of hillary clinton that were using e-mail addresses on this server while they were affiliated with the clinton foundation. >> i think all that i agree with, but i think the bigger picture, james, and looking back at her as a presidential candidate, is one of judgment. she's a very smart woman. what kind of judgment does it show that you would be willing to take these risks of setting up this kind of a serber knowing that that information was almost certain to come out, and knowing that you were put -- or have to assume putting at risk your communications? >> scott walker, got a big laugh line on the campaign trail recently saying that the chinese and russians know more about her e-mails than we do. i think it does -- it's less funny now as you see the amount of potentially important data that went across that network, and you wonder how could she -- how could she have done this? >> thank you all. still ahead, move over, donald trump. ben carson is surging in iowa and carly fiorina is making
i'm angela, and i quit smoking with chantix. for ten long years i was ready to quit. but i couldn't do it on my own. i needed help and chantix was there. and i did it. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. it reduces the urge to smoke. some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. some had seizures while taking chantix. if you have any of these, stop chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of mental health problems, which could get worse or of seizures. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if have these, stop chantix and call your doctor right away as some can be life-threatening. tell your doctor if you have heart or blood vessel problems, or develop new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away if you have symptoms of a heart attack or stroke. decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. most common side effect is nausea. i never thought i would be a non-smoker and i'm so proud.
ask your doctor if chantix is right for you. will 2016 be the year of the republican outsider? donnell trump still leads in the poelsz and continues to dominate the headlines, but some other republican first timers are beginning to gain momentum. retired neurosurgeon ben carson tied for trump in first place in the latest poll out of iowa and retired hewlett-packard ceo carly fiorina coming in third. she also places third in a new poll of republican primary voters in new hampshire. james, ben carson first. what do you make of his rise in the polls? >> i think he has got a lot of appeal to a lot of voters because is he an impressive man. he built a really world renowned pediatric neurosurgery practice, johns hopkins. he has real achievements, unlike
so many people who are on this, and i think the image that he projects of a calm, kind, generous man who fr what i can tell is largely the reality. >> trump accuses jeb bush of being low energy. ben carson is on stage low energy. >> well, it's funny, isn't it? you can -- it's a fine line between calm and reassure and wimpy, isn't it, if you are in these political debates. >> you don't put -- >> none by being wimpy. >> i think in his case the low key, the steadiness is appealing. especially in contrast to these kind of over the top personalities trump and cruz. it's almost kind of a nice breather in these debates when you fwet to carson, and he sounds like a kind of even toned person. >> all right. what's -- how is carson different than trump? >> oh, let me count the ways, paul. we don't have enough time to go into it. one of the ways is that he seems to be a uniter.
he is somebody also who can reach out to parts of the gop base that the party didn't win the last time around. the minority communities. being honored by the naacp at one point. >> those are people outside the republican coalition. >> that's true, but also his policy instincts seem to be very different from donald trump's. for example, he wants to simplify the tax code. he wants to be able to do it in 15 minutes. wouldn't that be terrific? whereas donald trump has talked about raising taxes on certain americans. he wants help savings accounts. donald trump said universal health care in canada has been praised. we don't know many policy spifx through carson, but what we know right now, there's a great difference. >> one way in which he is like donald trump is that he is a nonpolitician. obviously a lot of people want to vote for a nonpolitician. i think donald trump has kind of a 25% or 30% ceiling on his support. people who are looking for an
alternative to the system are now transferring a lot of that to ben carson. i don't think there's a real ceiling on ben carson's support. now you are beginning to see people say dobld trump is just a little too rich for me. too volatile. i still want a non-politician, and that's going over to ben carson. >> if add up all of the support for the three main outsiders, fiorina, trump, and carson, and it's over 50% in the national polls. the last time the republicans nominated somebody for the white house who was never held elective office, that was wendell willing where i in 1940. >> i remember that. >> and that didn't turn out very well. >> no. loo not so well for the republican party or the country. it is a cautionary tale. when you get a rook where i, and this is why they almost never get to the nomination is there is a large universe of things they don't know about politics, it includes they don't have talking points, and they haven't thought of 100 issues that a
normal politician has dealt with on a day to day basis. >> there are going to be rook where i mistakes. >> they do bring something to the race. take carly fiorina, for example. she has been an attack dog against hillary, really taking on the issues and the war on women in particular and providing another perspective. she can attack hillary without being accused of bullying her, and she's really the only one in the campaign that can do that. >> i think the potential for mistakes are there, and that's why -- we'll see how each of these candidates wears in the polls, but here's a fascinating question that i haven't been able to answer. it used to be, dan, that governors who were outside of washington, they would be the outsiders, right? they would come in. ronald reagan from california. even george w. bush from texas. they would come in and clean up the mess along with some executive experience. why aren't the republican governors running this time, former and current, considered to be outsiders enough? >> well, i think we're discovering the intensity of the
anger at the status quo. >> politics as usual? >> well, that's the question. what exactly are all these people angry about? we say the system. by the system do they mean the economy right now? poor job creation? or do they mean the system itself, system of checks and balances, and that's made it difficult for congress to operate. >> that's having a problem with the constitution. >> james madison. >> exactly. if you reach that point, then you have a kind of anger that equates to something like you're seeing in europe right now where people are just po' d at the central government, and they want to get rid of it. >> i would argue that one of these gfz probably is going to emerge as a major alternative to one of the outsider candidates as the campaign moves forward. what do you think, james? >> that's the history would say that's what happens here. this is a weird year. we're into this strange era where the obama era dialled back american growth and maybe people want a real change. >> thank you all. when we come back, a big win for
the obama administration and the effort to secure support for the iran nuclear deal. what's next for the opponents of the agreement? are democrats now accountable for the fallout in the middle east? defiance is in our bones. new citracal pearls. delicious berries and cream. soft, chewable, calcium plus vitamin d. only from citracal.
more. so this means that it -- this deal is moving forward now. any possible way to stop it? >> no. look, the only way it's going to be stopped is if the vote -- a vote of disapproval lays a predicate for the next administration to begin to walk away from the deal as iran cheats as it will cheat on aspects of the deal and as iran continues to behave the way it does in the middle east. >> now, the white house is building on they're not happy with just 37 votes i think is the latest count that we have in favor of -- they're trying to get 41 and then filibuster it in the senate so that using that procedural move, it would never really come up for a formal vote of disapproval and never get to the president's desk. >> right. you had 98 senators voting in may for a bill that would force at least -- at least us for a a so little confidence in this agreement they don't even want to have a vote because they know that even now, a bipartisan majority of both houses of
congress disapprove of the deal. >> are they going to go ahead with that, do you think? >> i think they will, but i suspect it's bad politics on the democrat -- on the democratic part. it looks very bad that they won't even allow it to come to a vote. >> why did this happen? i mean, the bipartisan opposition and the going into the august recess it looks like the opponents had some momentum and big ad campaigns against it by the american israeli political action committee and now the president is prevailing pretty easily. >> well, the president and his supporters rolled out a full court press against the wavering senators and the senators claimed they convinced them of this the best deal they could get. they deployed representatives from our european negotiating partners who sat down with them and said, look, we are not going to impose sanctions with you if you try to do that. you are on your own. and the argument was that u.s. leadership in the world would suffer. u.s. leadership in the world
began to suffer the day he began to negotiate with the iranians but let's understand the bizarre reality here. this is an arms control agreement. it will go through as we say with minority support from the senate. >> one party. >> from one party. >> partisan vote in the -- of a minority of both houses of congress. >> it's not passing. it's going through. >> well, this -- this is the thing. i think the long run democrats are playing a very foolish game. they're making themselves the hostages of the ayatollah. this will depend on whether iran abides by the terms and if the iranians don't use it as a base from which to start expanding their influence and testing the deal's limits. that's going to hurt democrats in the long run because they own this agreement in the way that no republican -- >> so you're saying they'll be accountable for what -- if iran cheats on the deal, they'll be accountable politically if iran
takes the money that's going to come in the easing of sanction, investing in hezbollah and other terror enterprises. if a democrat were here, he would say that's unfair. we're not responsible, this is an act arms accord agreement. >> it will release between 50 and $150 billion in the very near term to the iranians. all of this is predictable. we are talking about this right now as part of the nature of this agreement. and we also know that this is deal that lets iran inspect itself when it comes to the nuclear inspections and gives them the possibility for quick breakout time. so the democrats ought to be praying for some kind of extraordinary revolution in iran that changes the nature of their politics because otherwise, they're on the hook. >> then they could claim, look, we set this all up. otherwise, if iran cheats and gets away with it or even begins to have evidence that they cheat, it's going to be very
tricky for democrats. we have to take one more break. when we come back, "hits and misses of the week." and sometimes, i just don't eat the way i should. so i drink boost® to get the nutrition that i'm missing. boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a great taste. i don't plan on slowing down any time soon. stay strong. stay active with boost®. e #1) when returning home from deployment, you know, you have money saved up, so you're looking for that car to drive around in. and usaa actually makes that process so much easier. you can find the car and you can find it to your liking by using their app. i'm definitely able to see savings, uh, through using the car buying on usaa. i mean, amazing savings. i was like, wow, if i could save this much, then i could actually maybe upgrade a little bit. (announcer) usaa car buying service powered by truecar. save money, zero hassle.
your buddy ron once said he he couldn't.l your ceiling fan. and that one time ron said another chili dog was a good idea. yeah, it wasn't. so when ron said you'd never afford a john deere tractor, you knew better. now, ron does too. introducing the e series. legendary john deere quality. unexpected low price. see your local john deere dealer for great savings on the e series family of tractors. ♪
time now for the hits and misses. >> this is a miss for the gwen ifill, the anchor of pbs's news hour who sent out a tweet. she was retweeting an administration's tweet on the successes or the achievements of the iran nuclear deal as the administration sees it. she wrote, take that, bibi. she later explained this was not a partisan comment on her part. even that was too much for the pbs' ombudsman. this is a publicly funded television station. we should get opinion from our opinion leaders, but we should get straight news and not bias from people like mrs. ifill. >> bibi netanyahu, the prime
minister. >> that's right. >> i want to give a miss to president obama who whipped up fears about climate change and said nothing about the chinese ships off the coast. i don't know what you're worried about, paul, but i'm not worried about something that may happen a hundred years from now and a lot more worried about the chinese patrolling off of our coast. >> all right, james? >> on a serious note, at this time of the year i like to give a miss to espn for televising the little league world series. it's largely a competition to see which kids hit puberty first. it's ridiculous, but of course the espn also bounced curt schilling from the broadcast who actually has real achievements, not that espn would know the difference. >> what do you want, ozzie rules football in place of the little league? >> yes. >> remember, if you have your own hit or miss, tweet it to us. that's it for this week's show.
thanks to my panel and all of you for watching. i'm paul gigot. i hope to see you here next week. thousands of middle eastern and african migrants continue to pour into europe this weekend. they have gone hundreds of miles, traveling by boat, bus, train and foot. as the flood of humanity continues, casey mcfarland tells us what this means for our safety here at home. plus, kentucky clerk kim davis is in jail at this hour refusing to budge on her faith-based belief which compels her to turn away same-sex marriage couples. we'll tell you what she is saying today. and the day after thousands of