Skip to main content

tv   Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo  FOX News  July 28, 2019 7:00am-8:00am PDT

7:00 am
well, there you go. request. jedediah: that's not fair! pete: hey, we love griff anyway, you know? jedediah: a fun day. [laughter] ♪ ♪ maria: good sunday morning, everyone, thanks so much for joining us. i'm maria bartiromo, joining me exclusively on "sunday morning futures," two republican house members who pressed robert mueller about what his report found and what it missed, weighing in on that investigating the investigators. and the democrats' next step as they weigh impeaching president trump. exclusive, coming up. plus, his name was referenced more than 30 times during the former special counsel's testimony on capitol hill, george papadopoulos is here live on how his interaction with a mysterious man, why was he
7:01 am
charged for lying to mueller's team while joseph misfoot was not? also kevin mcaleenan on the trump administration scoring two major victories to secure the border, but questions loom. what help will the president get from congressional democrats? all that right here, right now as we look ahead on "sunday morning futures." ♪ ♪ maria: and good morning. new reaction to one of the most anticipated hearings on capitol hill in a very long time. former special counsel robert mueller answering questions last week on his nearly two-year investigation on russian election interference. democrats say mueller's testimony is empowering them to ramp up investigations of president trump. but republicans were left questioning how engaged mueller really was in writing of that report. and why there wasn't more focus on the origins of the fbi's
7:02 am
counterintelligence investigation into the trump campaign. republicans pressing for answers on a mysterious figure who looms large in the investigation. you heard about him here first, a london professor who interacted with george papadopoulos. >> did you interview him? is he western intelligence or russian intelligence? >> can't get into that. >> a lot of things you can't get into. what's interesting is you can charge 13 russians no one's ever heard of, no one's ever going to see them, you can charge them and all kinds of people who are around the president with false statements, but the guy who launches -- the guy who puts this whole story in motion, you can't charge him. >> once mifsud finally was questioned, he made false statements to the fbi. but you declined to charge him. is that correct? you did not indict mr. mifsud? >> i'm not going to speak to
quote
7:03 am
series of happenings as you articulate them. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. >> pardon? >> you did not indict mr. mifsud? >> true. maria: democratic investigators are deciding where to go from here, but there appears to be disagreement about what comes next. >> filing an application for the grand jury material underlying the mueller report. that information is critically important for our ability to examine witnesses including former white house counsel don mcgahn and to investigate the president's misconduct. >> we will proceed when we have what we need to proceed. not one day sooner. and everybody has the liberty and the luxury to espouse their own position and to criticize me for trying to go down the path in the most determined, positive way. maria: president trump weighed in on twitter writing this: robert mueller's testimony and the mueller report itself was a disaster for this illegal
7:04 am
democrat-inspired witch hunt. it is an embarrassment to the usa that they don't know how to stop. they can't help themselves, they are totally lost. they are clowns, writes the president. joining me right now, one of the law makers to who questioned mueller, republican congressman from california, devin nuñes is the ranking member of the house intel committee, a member of the house ways and means committee, and he's among the few congressmen who have been on this program for the last two and a half years telling the truth about what has taken place. congressman, thanks very much for joining us. >> thank you, maria. great to be with you. maria: reaction, your reaction from the mueller testimony. >> well, first of all, it's clear that mueller didn't write the report, and so who wrote the report? we think there were five or six lawyers involved. we're still trying to get to bottom of that. i would say one of the main takeaways is that we still don't have any russians, right? we don't know who the russians were that supposedly, you know,
7:05 am
colluded with the trump campaign. why? because there were none, and that's what we said two and a half years ago. there is evidence that the democrats colluded with the russians. we tried to get to the bottom of that but, clearly, mueller is and his team of lawyers and 40 investigators and $40 million didn't bother to look for those russians. they were only looking for the russians that the were mysterious because they don't exist and they never found them. maria: you focused on joseph mifsud in some of your questions. we had george papadopoulos on this program earlier in the year, and he basically broke the news about the fact that he was the first person to tell him that russia had hillary clinton's e-mails. also he broke news on this program earlier this year that another individual dropped $10,000 on his lap, another situation that you mentioned in your questioning. why was it so important for you to mention people like mifsud and others?
7:06 am
>> well, remember, mifsud is at the heart of this investigation. he is the one who supposedly knows about clinton's e-mails, that the russians have clinton e-mails. he supposedly said this to papadopoulos, something about e-mails. this is the excuse and the -- well, actually, it's not the excuse, it is the reason why, the documented reason why they opened the investigation on july 31, 2016. now, what i mentioned in my testimony and in my questioning, it's clear that the fbi did not open the investigation on july 31st. that's the paperwork. what we're trying to figure out is when did the fbi really start to run the investigation, what types of processes did they use, what was the predicate. because, look, it really appears like they were spying on the trump campaign. so let me, if i may, start with there was an event at cambridge university where carter page was
7:07 am
invited to it. in addition, steven miller and other trump campaign people were invited in june, in late may, early june. they get an invitation to a symposium that was held in cambridge in early july. now, at this, at this symposium you have characters like the british historian christopher andrew, you have people like the former head of mi-6, richard deerlove. this is some type of contract for hire spying outfit. what you have there is an american citizen, somebody who's long been involved in politics, and the guy's name is steven schragey. he knows that the house intelligence committee, the senate intelligence committee, the fbi, we want to talk to anyone and everyone who was dealing with carter page and other trump associates especially in early 2016. he is the one who invited carter page to this event.
7:08 am
schragey is the one who organized this event. but instead of coming forward, a guy who's been involved in politics for this long doesn't come forward? i want to know did he know about the steele dossier at that time? when did he find out about the steele dossier? did he give it to anyone? those are the types of things that he needs to come clean on because you know, look, maybe he was just a guy working for minimum wage, sweeping the floors around cambridge. i highly doubt it. now, when you look at the other brits that were involved in, more. martha: ---under-par what, this also -- marr ya, this also tied in with general flynn. specifically, christopher andrew said that general flynn had a russian girlfriend. well, that sounds really bad if general flynn had a russian girlfriend. well, in fact, when you actually look at it, you know, who she actually is, she was born in russia, she's now a u.k. citizen
7:09 am
and, guess what? she was never interviewed by the mueller team. so you don't interview schagey, supposedly flynn's girlfriend -- this is the reason they open up an investigation on general flynn -- she doesn't even get interviewed. so lots of questions and not very many answers. maria: you said this individual has been in politics for a long time. what was he in politics for? >> well, the best i can see he's worked at think tanks, he has a law degree, he was supposedly studying at cambridge. i'm not sure what he was studying. he's worked on numerous presidential campaigns. that's about all i know -- maria: did he work for national security for mitt romney? was he working with mitt romney in national security? >> yeah, i think he worked on the romney campaign, and i'm not sure, he may have worked on the
7:10 am
mccain campaign also. but look, this is why somebody like this who clearly knows republicans, he ought to come forward and tell us what he knows. like i said, maybe he's completely innocent of this, but he could shed a lot of light on what the fbi or the brits or private contractors or fusion gps -- maria: yeah. >> you know, whoever was doing the investigating before july 31st, we've been looking for that for a really long time, as you know. maria: congressman, you've mentioned a lot of individuals. i want to ask you about that because all of these individuals that you're mentioning are, like, intel aides across the world. one from australia, one from britain, one from italy. i want to know who coordinated all of that and who was the mastermind behind the plan to insert donald trump into the russia meddling story. we're going to take a short break, and then i'm going to come back and ask you that, what you think, who you think is the mastermind. follow me on twitter, on instagram as well.
7:11 am
we're going to take a short break and have a lot more with congressman devin nuñes, secretary mcaleenan and george pop adopt louse coming up. stay with us . ♪ uh, i'll look into it. (phone rings) lisa jones! lisa: (on phone) hey carl, what are you charging me for online equity trades? (nervous chuckle) lisa: and do i get my fees back if i'm not happy? like a satisfaction guarantee? ugh. schwab! lisa: oh right, i'm calling schwab. thanks, carl! wait, lisa! lisa... are you getting low costs backed by a satisfaction guarantee? if not, talk to schwab. a modern approach to wealth management.
7:12 am
if not, talk to schwab. whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor
7:13 am
na blend of quality probiotics. and fermented whole food botanicals, expertly curated to naturally support your gut health every day. go with align whole food blend. from the pros in digestive health.
7:14 am
maria: welcome back. we are back with california congressman devin nuñes, ranking republican on the house intel committee, among the questions of special counsel robert mueller e. congressman, we know based on what you've told us, john radcliffe has told us over the last year and a half that this investigation by the fbi likely started at the end of 2015. we know that at the end of 2015, going into 2016, they were very suspicious informant-type situations going on. and yet in the testimony, you mentioned to mueller that somebody dropped $10,000 in george papadopoulos' lap, but that was during the special counsel which means that was in 2017, they were still trying to entrap people during the special counsel's investigation?
7:15 am
>> well, we don't know the answer to that because mueller wouldn't answer the question. so you're right. so in the last segment i talked about general flynn. some brits dirtied him up claiming that he had a russian girlfriend, right? so these were former intelligence guys, a story that went public. this is why they were investigating flynn, you know, back in 2015. then if you move into 2016, someone started setting up these so-called events or symposiums that it just so happened that all of these people got invited to. now, you're going to have george papadopoulos on earlier, which this is another track where you had a foreign politician named alexander downer who still is unclear because he claims he didn't ask about e-mails, papadopoulos said he didn't talk about e-mails, but yet somehow the fbi uses papadopoulos to open the investigation, and then they continued to ask papadopoulos about e-mails all through the rest of 2016.
7:16 am
but downer never said anything about e-mails. so, you know, this is another thing that mueller couldn't answer this week. so now when you look at what they did in 2017, after the special counsel was set up, you -- somebody gave papadopoulos $10,000. and it was odd that, you know, just a week before they arrested him at the dulles airport. now remember, papadopoulos has been cooperating with the investigation. he had went through several interviews in the early parts of 2017. so none of this makes any sense, and and it really looks like the mueller team -- remember, i call it the mueller dossier. mueller clearly wasn't involved in this, but this is nothing more, nothing less than a cover-up, okay? why would you not -- you write a whole report on natalia, you mention her 65 times in the report, okay? she's a russian. she met with the trump team one
7:17 am
time for less than 20 minutes, okay in she met with glenn simpson who was running the dirty operations for the clinton campaign at least three times, my guesses is multiple times, maybe dozens of times. you put it in a report, but you don't talk about the it. maria: right. >> there's so much in that mueller report that really just looks like a glossover and a cover-up. maria: yeah. clearly, as we have learned more and more they used george papadopoulos and also carter page as windows into the trump campaign, and with papadopoulos, this whole idea that somebody told him that russia had hillary clinton's e-mails, and because he was told that, they tried to play it that he was part of a conspiracy. this is what with i want to know and what i think our viewers want to know. who is the mastermind of this story? who ises the mastermind of the plan to insert donald trump into
7:18 am
russia meddling, which we know russia has been meddling for decades? >> well, i think we can say -- let's talk about what we can, what we know are facts, what we can say for certain. i think that's helpful. we know the clinton campaign, number one, so they're aware of a lot of this, right? they're involved in the creation of thes do area -- the creation of the dossier, they hire fusion gps and christopher steele. that's a fact. we know the fbi is involved to some degree. we don't know exactly what they were doing before july 31, 2016. why? because they wouldn't answer the questions that we had over the last two years. and, in fact, when we were getting close, we wanted transcripts, there were things that we wanted, those were not beginning to the united states house of representatives under republican control. do you know why? because the mueller dossier team wouldn't let it happen. so that's why i say somebody needs to look at these characters that were on mueller's team.
7:19 am
i think they obstructed justice. they obstructed a congressional investigation. so that's number two. we have, we have the clinton team, we have the fbi. there's also a third team that we know of, that is this cambridge team, this group of british peoplethat were there, these intelligence-related folks including the american citizen, stephen schagey, who organized in the event. they were involved in the character assassination of a three-star general, the former head of the -- the director of intelligence, general michael flynn. maria: right. >> so those are the three entities that we know, and i think what the doj needs to get to bottom of is when did these all intersect. you don't get that until you start to interview people and, remember, the mueller team never bothered to interview -- maria: real quick, we've got to jump, but is it more likely that the cia would integrate all of these international sources across the world or the fb
7:20 am
initiation c-- cia or fbi in terms of getting all these intel associates like the downers and mifsuds of the world together? >> well, as you know, we have jurisdiction over both fbi and cia and what they do overseas. maria: yeah. >> we have lots of information of fbi people going overseas and doing things, we don't really have any information from cia. so far they've really come clean. i would say the only one that has, that has questions to answer is john brennan, because we now know that john brennan briefedded harry reid on the dossier in august of 2016. at the same time, he never briefed me or paul ryan who was the speaker of the house at the time. maria: yeah. well, we keep peeling back the onion and learning more and more. congressman, it's good to have you on the program, thanks very much. you should be taking a victory lap after all your great work with. congressman devin nuñes. straight ahead, acting homeland
7:21 am
security secretary kevin mcaleenan is here on the trump administration scoring two major victories on the border. guatemala becomes -- migrants seeking asylum here in the u.s. and then back to mueller investigation . ♪ folios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management.
7:22 am
7:23 am
we carry flowers that signifyn why we want to end the disease. and we walk so that one day, there will be a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor. join the fight at alz.org/walk. hey! i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass.
7:24 am
maria: welcome back. the trump administration scoring two major victories on efforts to end the border crisis. first, the president announced a new asylum deal with guatemala, saying it will put, quote, coyotes and smugglers out of business. secondly, the supreme court this week clearing the way for the administration to use $2.5 billion in pentagon money for border wall construction. joining me right now is acting secretary of homeland security kevin mcaleenan and, mr. secretary, it's always a pleasure to see you. thanks very much for joining us this morning. >> good to be with you.
7:25 am
maria: i want to is ask you about the impact, but first, can you assess the situation? we heard a lot in these last couple of weeks from the likes of congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez, to lindsey graham, the senator came back and came on the show after he viewed the border. what can you tell us in terms of what is happening today? >> yeah. well, maria, the situation's improving on the border by almost every measure, but we do remain in the midst of a border security crisis. let me give you some of the statistics. back in may we were apprehending about 4,650 people a day at that southern border. now that number's about 2,600. so we've had a significant drop, 28% in june, another 20 plus percent in july so far, and that's due to two administration initiatives, engaging our international partners in mexico and guatemala in particular. mexico has stepped up and addressed security on their southern boarder and the transportation routes that smugglers are using. and as you heard, guatemala's agreed not only to work with us
7:26 am
on asylum in the region, but it's already been taking action to tackle criminal organizations that are smuggling families and kids. at the same time, we've reduced the number of people in custody at the border, those challenging situations with crowding we were having. we had almost 20,000 people in custody in early june. that number last night was 7,200, and we've reduced the number of unaccompanied children by 90%. we've made a lot of progress, but we've got more to do. maria: i want to ask you about that. unaccompanied alien children in june were 7,378. way down from may's numbers of 11,000 plus. family units in june 57,389, way down from the 84,499 1 that we saw back in may. you also, when i spoke with you earlier, you told me in the month of june there weren't any -- i'm sorry, the month of july there weren't any large groups. because you had been having
7:27 am
busloads of people, right? thousands of people crossing at once. no major groups in the month of july? >> exactly. that's been one of the significant efforts that mexico's undertaken, to reduce the phenomenon of large are groups. where you were at the border, maria, in el paso, we were seeing groups of 400, in one case 1,000 crossing. it's a completely different scenario than may when we had 28 large groups and up to 1,000 per group. it was very different and challenging effort. maria: so going through, so the money that can be used, you already have the appropriated funding for 53 miles that have already been built, correct? you say you're going to have more than 200 miles built by next year. that money has been appropriated already. but then the second set of dollars, this is the dod money, that has the potential to more than double the activity. >> that's exactly right. it was a big victory in the supreme court to allow the department of defense to move forward with that $2.5 billion
7:28 am
to really accelerate the progress on the wall and kind of double what we're doing with the congressionally-appropriated funding which is going well, as you noted. we're up to 54 miles since we talked,s building every day down on the border, and that's providing significant new operational capability and helping us control some high-trafficked areas of the border. maria: yeah, we're looking at fresh video that we have from this office, so thank you for that, to really explain the story to our viewers. some people talk about this as a national security issue, but they don't also talk about the cost. there's a real expense to having a surge in migrants at our borders, and just the expense of holding them, right? tell us about that. >> yeah. i guess one way to look at it is 4.5 billion in the emergency supplemental that we had to ask for and got from congress finally, 75% of that went to our partners at health and human services simply for the care and custody of unaccompanied children for the remaining four months of the year.
7:29 am
that's how expensive this is to try to provide them proper care and just given the flow that we're facing at the border, the number of people and the number of dollars it takes to provide medical, education, appropriate settings for kids. and that's a kind of government cost alone that we're facing. but then there are costs in communities as well. maria: i want to get to what congress needs to do, and they left town, of course, we know that. before we get there, explain the renting program. when i was at the border in el paso, i couldn't believe how many young children that i saw. i saw one 8-year-old and a 10-year-old, they said, oh, we were with my mother, she said she was going to get something to eat, and now she's gone. and then people who were questionable even as a family. tell us what you've seen in terms of people renting children, renting family and how they have to pay off the drug lords. >> absolutely. this is one of the most concerning areas, is the exploitation of children. we've had over 5,000 cases this year of adults bringing children across, claiming a family
7:30 am
relationship, and it didn't exist. some of that could be simply bringing a child for a friend who's already here in the u.s. but more nefariously, we've seen cases where children are used multiple times by different adults, we call it child recycling, we've seen human trafficking. and probably the most egregious case this year, homeland security investigations through a dna test and interview identified a 51-year-old man who purchased a six-month-old infant for $80 in guatemala, and he was trying the use that infant to be released into the united states. maria: unbelievable. >> horrific. maria: that is horrific. so now connect the dots in terms of what can be done. we had senator lindsey graham on in the program two weeks ago. he said he was going to try to get a vote for his legislation that he's working on before the august recess. here's what he told me just two weeks ago, secretary. listen to this. >> i'm saying you can't apply for asylum in america anymore, you've got to do it in your home country or mexico. i'm also saying we can't process
7:31 am
a minor claim in 20 days, give us more time to process minor claims for families. 30% of the people with small children are fake families. the word is out in central america you bring a small child to the united states, you're home free. i want to change that narrative. we're going to vote before the august recess. i am willing to spend money to help central america, democrats have mentioned that. i will do that, but we've got to change our laws, or this never stops. maria: that was two weeks ago. are the leadership in guatemala and honduras and el salvador getting the message, and tell me about that bill. i know you worked closely with senator graham on that, right? >> absolutely. senator graham understands very well the three major loopholes that are driving this crisis, and his bill would address each one of them. we worked closely with him on the language to make sure we could close that down and reduce this incentive that's driving family and kids to take this dangerous journey in the hands of smugglers. but in terms of the governments in central america, i've been
7:32 am
down there multiple times as acting secretary working with each of the three presidents, but guatemala's really stepped up. they're tackling the alien smuggling organizations, and now on friday adding to that, addressing asylum together and trying to return the understanding of what asylum really means in international law. that's what senator graham's bill would do as well. maria: you need congress to act a. they left, now you've got to wait six weeks, i guess. >> we made very clear the targeted changes in law that we need. maria: secretary, thanks very much for joining me this morning. >> thanks, maria. appreciate it. maria: up next, we will return to the mueller testimony with congressman john ratcliffe, next. whoa. travis in it made it. it's amazing. oh is that travis's app? it's pretty cool, isn't it? there's two of them. they're multiplying. no, guys, its me.
7:33 am
see, i'm real. i'm real! he thinks he's real. geico. over 75 years of savings and service. summer's not the time for making bucket lists. bookers know summer is for booking it. (chime, slam, chime) like booking a beachside resort and ordering two more tacos than you need to. check. showing the deep end who's boss. check. starting a scooter gang with the fam. check. awesome. bookers know summer won't last forever. you're going to thank me. so be a booker at booking.com. the world's #1 choice for booking accommodations.
7:34 am
so be a booker at booking.com. the doctor's office might mejust for a shot.o but why go back there when you can stay home with neulasta® onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta® reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1% a 94% decrease.
7:35 am
neulasta® onpro is designed to deliver neulasta® the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta® is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta® if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home ask your doctor about neulasta® onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
7:36 am
>> respectfully, director, it was knotts the special counsel's job to conclusively determine donald trump's innocence or to exonerate him, because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. it exists for everyone. everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. and because there is a presumption of innocence, prosecutors never, ever need to conclusively determine it. donald trump is not above the law. he's not. but he damn sure or shouldn't be below the law are. maria: my next guests is one of the republicans who questioned robert mueller last week on whether the russia investigation was fueled by an anti-trump bias, period.
7:37 am
congressman john ratcliffe is a member of the house judiciary, intelligence and homeland security committees, also a former federal prosecutor. congressman, it's good to have you, thanks so much for joining me. >> good morning, maria. maria: you zeroed in on exonerate, because the special counsel said we could not exonerate the president. why was that line of questioning important? >> well, maria, the democrats built their entire strategy around the special counsel's statement that donald trump could not be exonerated from potential obstruction of justice crimes, but what the democrats and the special counsel didn't see was the fatal defect in that legal reasoning, that by requiring donald trump to conclusively prove his innocence, they were depriving him of the one thing that no one can be one proved of -- no one can be deprived of. by getting them to admit these facts really rocked the foundation of their entire obstruction of justice analysis.
7:38 am
at the end of the day, you can't impeach somebody over obstruction of justice where you use the wrong legal standard, a legal standard that doesn't exist. it seemed like that was -- maria: so do you think you popped the impeachment bubble? >> i think everybody saw and a lot of democrats have conceded that it's time to move on, that there's a hole in the impeachment balloon that's large enough for jerry nadler and adam schiff to walk through together. but schiff and nadler don't seem to see that, you know? the same folks that promised that there was going to be impeachment by collusion, you know, that died when the mueller report came out and said there was no collusion or conspiracy. then they shifted to it was going to be impeachment by obstruction of justice, that robert mueller was going to breathe life into the report. instead, he sucked the life out of it by, again, plying a legal standard that didn't exist. now they're moving on saying they want to pursue purr by the court -- on instruction by the
7:39 am
court system. look, it's becoming a joke. i think people see that, and nadler and schiff are starting to look more like laurel and hardy. time to move on. maria: what is your reaction overall? i mean, congressman, if there's one question that i've been asking this entire two-year period, it's this: how is it possible that the mueller report, the mueller investigation's going to have any credibility at all if robert mueller does not look at the origins of the investigation? if he does not look at specifically why, why am i looking at trump being involved in russia meddling? we know russia has meddled for decades. why is trump part of this? so i ask you, your reaction -- >> right. maria: -- to the fact that mueller said he doesn't -- he's not familiar with fusion gps. it's not in his but view. can that slide? >> of course it can't. trey gowdy said it best this week, the person who learned the most about the mueller report during wednesday's hearings was
7:40 am
robert mueller. and that's sad but true. and really what it meant is that the mueller report and its conclusions weren't from robert mueller, they were written what a lot of people believe was hillary clinton's de facto legal team, people that had supported her, even represented some of her aides. and so the mueller report is really going to be difficult for the democrats or anyone to rely upon the findings of a report when they just listened to the man whose name was on top of it not have a command of what was anytime. maria: the fact that you did have other people writing the report, do you think people understand that? andrew weissman was a hillary clinton donor, he was at her election party, right? >> it's not just andrew weissman. aaron zebley represented hillary clinton's aide who set up the upper and mashed her
7:41 am
blackberries with a hammer. there were all sorts of folks, again, that were close to the clinton foundation and, you know, so the bias that was involved there, i think, are fair things to talk about. and i think that's why in light of the disastrous testimony from robert mueller, you know, the democrats paid a heavy price for bringing a reluctant witness to testify. they. played their hand -- they overplayed their hand and did it in front of a a national television audience. it was a great week for donald trump because of that. to your point, maria, now the things that bob mueller said he didn't know about and his team clearly didn't look at, those are things that are there for bill barr and the department of justice to look at. because we know that things happened in the obama administration that haven't been answered. there's been no accountability for that yet. maria: let's take a short break, and i want to ask you where the crime and the wrongdoing really
7:42 am
was, because we know that barr's looking at it, and john durham is looking at it is and the i.g., along with senator lindsey graham. also ahead, my exclusive interview with george papadopoulos, his name was referenced more than 30 times during the mueller testimony. back in a minute. ♪ ♪ if you live with diabetes, why fingerstick when you can scan? with the freestyle libre 14 day system just scan the sensor with your reader, iphone or android and manage your diabetes.
7:43 am
with the freestyle libre 14 day system, a continuous glucose monitor, you can check your glucose levels any time, without fingersticks. ask your doctor to write a prescription for the freestyle libre 14 day system. you can do it without fingersticks. learn more at freestylelibre.us you can do it without fingersticks. book two, separate qualifying stays at choicehotels.com... ...and earn a $50 gift card. because when your business is rewarding yourself... ...our business is you. book direct at choicehotels.com you don't see psoriasis. you see clear skin. you see me. but if you saw me before cosentyx... ♪
7:44 am
i was covered. it was awful. but i didn't give up. i kept fighting. i got clear skin with cosentyx. 3 years and counting. clear skin can last. see if cosentyx could make a difference for you. cosentyx is proven to help people with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis find clear skin that can last. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx, you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. if you have inflammatory bowel disease, tell your doctor if symptoms develop or worsen. serious allergic reactions may occur. see me now. i'm still clear. how sexy are these elbows? get clear skin that can last. ask your dermatologist about cosentyx.
7:45 am
maria: welcome back. i am back now with republican congressman from texas, john ratcliffe, sits on the house intel committee as well as judiciary and homeland security. congress bank, let me ask you about where -- congressman, let me ask you about where the wrongdoing was specifically. you have john durham looking at this origins of the russia investigation, you have william barr, you have senator lindsey graham and the i.g. report. tell us what they're going to find. where ises the wrongdoing? >> i think the first thing we need to do is make sure we don't do what the democrats have done. they accused donald trump of a crime, and then they try to reverse engineer a process to justify that accusation. so i'm not going to accuse any
7:46 am
specific person of any specific crime. i just want there to be a fair process to get there. what i do know as a former federal prosecutor is it does appear that there were crimes committed during the obama administration. we talked earlier about michael flynn. his phone call with the russian ambassador was a highly classified nsa intercept. someone in the obama administration leaked that call to washington post. that's a felony. glenn simpson from fusion gps, in talking about the steele dossier, said under that he and bruce ohr did not meet until after the election. bruce ohr said under that they met three months before the let's. one of them -- before the election. one of them is not telling the truth. we need a process to identify that. where it all started, jim comey. he admitted that he leaked his confidential conversations with the president to a reporter. did that include classesfied information? -- classified information?
7:47 am
we need a fair processes to find out answers to that. i trust, because bill barr has earned my trust already and the trust of the american people, that there'll be a fair processes with john durham and with michael horowitz to get answers to that and provide accountability where it really belongs. maria: and, obviously, if you've got a team of clinton donors like andrew weissman and the others that you mentioned, they are not going to have much enthusiasm to go investigate why hillary clinton and her campaign paid for a dossier of, you know, lies about donald trump. >> well, the special counseling told us -- special counsel told us, the words from his own mouth is that they didn't do it. maria: yeah. >> and if they didn't do it, the only place we can get the answers is from the justice department right now. the american people want that. their faith and trust, maria, has been shaken in our justice department, and the only way to get that back is real accountability with a fair process. again, i are supreme confidence in bill barr's ability to
7:48 am
deliver that. and at the end of the day, wherever the outcome may be as long as we know that the process was fair, the evaluation was fair, justice will be done. look, the truth also defends itself. maria: all right. we're going to go. i want to talk about joseph mifsud, because i know that if it is established that he was, in fact, working for western intel like the cia, then we know that this was all entrapment. we're going to talk about that with george papadopoulos. congressman, good to see you this morning. thank you. >> thanks, maria. maria: his name was referenced more than 30 times during mueller's testimony this week. george papadopoulos how his interact with that mysterious man helped launched the fbi probe into the trump campaign. that's next. ♪ ♪ when i was diagnosed with breast cancer,
7:49 am
i went straight to ctca. after my mastectomy, i felt like part of my identity was being taken away. my team made me feel whole again. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now.
7:50 am
7:51 am
7:52 am
>> before you have arrested george papadopoulos in july of 2017, he was given $10,000 in cash. in israel. do you know who gave him that cash? >> again, that's outside our aim and questions such as that, you go to fbi or the department. >> but it involved your investigation. >> it involved persons involved in my investigation. maria: that was robert mueller dodging questions about a mysterious $10,000 cash payment that former trump campaign aide george papadopoulos said he received in july of 2017. he broke that news on this program a couple of months ago. george papadopoulos is back with me right now, he's the author of the book "deep state target," and that's exactly what he was. george, thanks so much for joining us. >> thanks a lot for having me, maria: who gave you the money, george? >> i was very happy to see that devon can nuñes brought that up.
7:53 am
a man gave me this money under very suspicious circumstance, and a simple google search about this individual will demonstrate that he was cia or a state department asset in south africa during the '90s and the 2000s. i think around the time when bob mueller was actually the director of fbi. so i have my theory of what that really was all about. the money, i gave it to my attorney because i felt it was given to me under very suspicious circumstances, and upon coming back to united states i had about seven or eight fbi agents rummaging through my luggage looking for money. maria: so in other words, you are given money in israel, $10,000 in cash. you don't keep the money, you send it and give it to your lawyers, and then you get on a flight to go home, when you land at dulles, there are fbi agents arresting you asking do you have any money. >> basically, that's exactly what happened. and what i think this whole
7:54 am
set-up was all about was trying to frame a violation against me that i was under some sort of illicit surveillance for actually, i think, years leading up to and during my time on the trump campaign. we probably don't have enough time to get into it right now, but i'm pretty sure what it's going to demonstrate and probably add context to why bob mueller was illustrating in his mueller report that george papadopoulos was being investigated for husband ties to israel. -- his ties to israel x. then, of course, this $10,000 which which i believe was a set-up by the fbi likely or even the special counsel's office, it was designed to make it look like i was actually some sort of foreign agent which i never have been and i never will be. and that's, quite frankly, what i think that was all about. maria: yeah. we have a timeline here on screen, and it goes back to all the way in the beginning when you first got that job at the international center of law practice, and you said to them, look, i want to leave because i
7:55 am
want to go work for donald trump. and they said, wait, wait, before you leave, we don't want you to leave because we want you to go to rome at this important symposium because there are a lot of people that you should be meeting in rome. and, of course, one of those people was joseph mifsud who ended up telling you that russia had hillary clinton's e-mails. >> that's absolutely correct. so about the moment i joined the trump campaign, i'm being invited by the former foreign minister the of italy -- foreign minister of italy to meet joseph mifsud. by a company which i used to work for which is connected to mi-6. so clearly, there was some sort of global or at least european radar on me while i was living in london and as soon as i was joining the trump campaign, which not even the media knew at the time, i'm being introduced to joseph mifsud in rome at a school that trains the cia and
7:56 am
the fbi. why i was introduced to joseph mifsud now that we know that they're connected to the mi-6 and even the fbi makes things even more suspicious and a lot more damning, in my opinion. maria: well, it's interesting that the issues that you went through given the fact that you were, you know, doing your own work, but they wanted to know what you knew about hillary clinton's e-mails after mifsud told you that. why did they arrest you when you landed in dulles? it just because they -- is it just because they suspected you had $10,000 in cash? >> actually, because the money wasn't with me. as i explained, i had given it to my lawyer because i wasn't interested in some sort of shady business abroad. i get there and then all of a sudden the prosecutors are about an hour late to detail what exactly i was being charged with, and that was lying to the fbi. maria: wow. >> and then later we find out that the lie was about me
7:57 am
misremembering when i met joseph mifsud a year before the fbi came to interview me. maria: george, it sounds like you did everything right. good to have you on the program, thank you, george papadopoulos. haveha a great sunday, everybod. . with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today.
7:58 am
♪ whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do.
7:59 am
and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor carl, i appreciate the invite here. as my broker, what am i paying you to manage my money? it's racquetball time. (thumps) ugh! carl, does your firm offer a satisfaction guarantee? like schwab does. guarantee? (splash)
8:00 am
carl, can you remind me what you've invested my money in? it's complicated. are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is being managed? if not, talk to schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. >> buzzfeed this sunday, media hype, consensus that robert mueller hearing was huge bust for the democrats given performance. >> i'm not going speak to that. i'm sorry, what was the question >> i think this has been a disaster for the democrats and i think it's been a disaster for the reputation of robert mueller. >> the headline out of the hearing so far, mueller says that his report does not exonerate the president despite the president saying so. >> from the democratic side it's been a bust.

71 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on