tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC August 17, 2011 1:00am-2:00am PDT
staying with us for the next hour. today was day two of president obama's big three-day looks like a campaign, sounds like a campaign, but we swear is not a campaign bus tour through the midwest. and again because this is not -- not a campaign trip, they say, today mr. obama's bus tour found itself rolling through iowa of all places. oh, hey, what do you know, must have taken a wrong turn somewhere, but now that we're here, hello, iowa. after weeks of republican presidential hopefuls barn storming the state of iowa, today the democratic presidential nominee for 2012 took a tour through the state as well, and the message president obama delivered in iowa today is the message he's been delivering at every spot along the tour through the country this week, we need jobs, we need jobs now, and we need congress to get to work on getting america some jobs. >> the prime driver of economic
growth and jobs is going to be our people and the private sector and our businesses, but you know what, government can help. government can make a difference. so i hope that i can count on you in the days ahead to lend your voice to this fight to strengthen our economy. i need you to keep your pressure on your elected representatives for things like the payroll tax cuts or road construction funds, or the other steps that will help to put our country back to work. >> government can help. government can make a difference, he says. that's the message president obama has been delivering in iowa. it's what he said today, government has a role to play in getting the economy back on its feet. that sort of thing sounds like a foreign language to you, sounds like the stuff of pipe dreams, it's probably because republicans in washington have spent the better part of the last eight months somewhat monopolizing the discourse by convincing somebody that no matter what the country is in,
no matter what disaster we are mired in, there can be no fiscal policy to improve the economy whatsoever. no action taken by the government to improve the economy, and if the democrats or the president want to try it, republicans in congress say they will block it. whether or not they will block everything remains to be seen, president obama's trying to change those dynamics in part with his bus tour this week telling folks at every top that congress is all the stuff we can do, the president is saying, call your member of congress, tell them we should do this stuff, tell them we should use economic policy to help create jobs. the president started trying to enlist average americans' help for leverage against congress during the debt ceiling fight, he's continuing asking americans for their help now. but if republicans keep convincing the beltway nothing is possible, if that is true, if republicans are, in fact, going to be able to block everything
that president obama and the democrats want to do to overtly help the economy, if the shocks we've been through over the last few weeks from getting our credit downgraded, s&p says because republicans said national default was no big deal for them, from the downgrade to the stock markets terrifying ride, if those shocks are not enough to shock us into a new republican reality and republicans are going to stop any new fiscal action to help the economy, there's only one other tool available to the government, it's called monetary policy, federal reserve, how much money is in the economy at any time, interest rates charged to banks, all that fun stuff. the president alone can't do anything on fiscal policy really, fiscal policy is only controlled through congress, and republicans, so far at least, have decided to stop any fiscal policy from going through congress, so the only other thing available is the federal reserve run, in fact, by a republican, who was appointed by
george w. bush. it's this baldy, beardy man, named ben bernanke. no matter how this idea sounds, stay with me, puppy, up, up, not down, wake up, puppy, come on, it's going to be -- up -- no matter how adorably sleep inducing federal revenue is, they find ben bernanke to be riveting, the u.s. economy needs a shot in the arm, right? needs some help. if republicans are going to stop that from coming from the president, then even the suggestion of the possibility of a little stimulation from this fellow at the fed is the sort of thing to send wall street into ecstasy. you may remember the mere
possibility of the f.e.d. launching a new round of stimulus. the instant reaction to that comment was that stocks shot up almost immediately. the market loved the idea of the f.e.d. doing something to help the sputtering economy. you may recall last week when the f.e.d. announced it was going to keep interest rates exceptionally low for the next two years, the market shot up more than 400 points that day after losing 600 points the day before. the extent to which congressional republicans are able to stop there from being any jobs policy in congress to help the economy is the extent to which we are all sort of dependent on hopefully, maybe, the f.e.d. doing something to try to help. it's essentially the only option the country has. if you don't want the economy being helped, like the idea of the economy in the tank, you better hope not only the congressional republicans keep blocking any policy from getting through capitol hill, but you also better hope the f.e.d. feels too afraid to act as well,
and it is in that context in which the latest entrant into the republican presidential rate, texas governor rick perry, today threatened to lynch baldy, beardy, ben bernanke, the chairman of the federal reserve. >> if this guy prints more money between now and the election, i don't know what y'all would do to him in iowa, but we'd -- we would treat him pretty ugly down in texas. i mean, printing more money to play politics at this particular time in american history is almost treacherous -- treasonous in my opinion. >> lynch the chairman of the federal reserve if he tries to help the economy. stay out of texas, ben bernanke. people being outraged about this is likely to be exactly what rick perry wants. this was an applause line for him, and not only is he not
apologizing for it, he's proud of it, rick perry telling reporters today "i'm just passionate about the issue and we stand by what we said." being deliberately provocative with lines like this is one of the ways rick perry has tried to shape his image as a candidate. saying on day two of his campaign that the u.s. military doesn't respect president obama, saying that the president does not love the united states or at least saying he's not sure if mr. obama does and he really should be asked whether he truly loves the united states, refusing to tell a reporter who asked whether or not he was carrying a gun on the campaign trail. ben smith from politico reporting, "i asked perry if he was armed today, he declined to say. that's why it's called concealed." this is what gets shorthanded as rick perry's style, his bravado, his swagger. this is actually what he's marketing as a candidate, alex perine put it today, this is feature of the rick perry candidacy, the feature, not a bug.
rick perry wants to be the guy who says outrageous confrontational stuff, the guy that threatens harm to the chairman of the federal reserve instead of saying what his own monetary policy would be as president. that's boring. this is his brand, the kind of thing rick perry wants to be known for, saying the blunt in politic thing, letting people know how tough he is, this is one of the moments that's a test for the political system and the political media. are you going to help this guy do what he wants you to do? if you want to talk about extremism and rick perry, you sort of have two options just from, say, today's news. you could talk about rick perry's over tough language implying violence towards an economic policy official that is a form of extremism, please, he'd be pleased if you were outraged about it, so try to be outraged, or another option is to talk about rick perry saying social security is a ponzi scheme that is unconstitutional
and must be abolished at the federal level. you can talk about rick perry saying yesterday that the united states government should have defaulted rather than raising the debt ceiling, saying he would have voted against raising the debt ceiling. that's another option. that's substantiative extremism. governor perry made it clear last month, in his mind, the united states going into default would be no big deal. >> i think this -- this threat that some how another the world's going to come to an end and the threat of we're not going to be able to pay our bills is a bit of a stretch. >> so that's an option, that sort of comment, that substantiative rick perry extremism, and that is available for discussion. rick perry also opposed to the 16th amendment to the constitution, repealing that, of course, would eliminate the federal income tax, which would remove 80% of all government
revenue, because that will help the debt problem. that is, strictly speaking in terms of its relationship to mainstream economic thinking, that idea, get rid of the source of 80% of all federal revenue, getting rid of the income tax altogether, that technically speaking is extreme when compared to mainstream economic thought. perhaps if he was threatening to beat the 16th amendment to death in texas, maybe then we could get political shock and outrage over that kind of extremism as well. joining us now, ezra klein, columnist for "the washington post" and bloomberg, ezra, i have to tell you you've been doing a great jobs hosting in the afternoon on the martin bashir show. what is the warning to the f.e.d.? >> i'm sort of loving. what was remarkable about the perry clip is he began by saying i'm not going to take a position on the federal reserve, i want to part of it. then he thought for a moment,
actually, if i was going to have a position, we should possibly beat him. it's really quite a take, but it is extraordinarily ignorant. even putting aside how much money you print between now and the election, there will be growth in the american population, rick perry knows this, what does he think the money supply's supposed to do, sit there, supposed to have less money as we have more people? that's a bad idea. >> does this come from an idea if you just talk generally about money and generally about spending and generally about debt without actually getting to the specifics of what it is that you're criticizing, just the mention of those things sounds bad to people and makes you sound like a fiscal conservative? >> yes, and the meta solutions, they sound like solutions, sort of even look like them if you look closely, but they are not. medicaid, medicare, social security, they are unconstitutional, but we're not going to get rid of them, we're going to give them to states.
monetary policy, we're not going to make decisions about it, we're just going to say we don't like it, tarp, not going to say what we'd have done instead of it, we wouldn't have had it. and so you have this sort of governing theory of just not really saying what you would be doing but saying something but nevertheless taking a position, right? and your position is no position. your position is you don't like it and we shouldn't have done it and that is sort of enough, because who's going to ask the follow-up question? >> well, the follow-up question, to me, is what's your big idea, buck-o, try to sound tough, go with the guy, the tough guy in the situation. at the same time, when you've got this many candidates running for the nomination, them all saying no and i hate it all, are you elevating any of them to ask them to say what their federal policy would be? even when mitt romney has done
that as a guy that's tried to take it seriously as a frontrunner here and somebody trying to engage somebody who's -- they are comfortable they are not going to be pressed on those things. >> they are right. when i was watching fox news debate, which i thought the fox news folks did a pretty good job, when i heard the doorbell go off after about a minute just made me sick to my stomach, put the puppy on, but we might need to hear it. what's amazing about what perry's doing, it was called the federal reserve. won a noble prize as an economist and said the great depression was monetary, it was a monetary failure, and republicans like this. by the way, he was right, but they liked it because that meant it wasn't private businesses fault and the only reason is congress spending money. and get in the way of it. perry is throwing all of that
out and he doesn't have a new framework to support what we should do, he just has nothing, but to get at that you need to have a long conversation, talk about milton friedman, monetary regulations, and no one likes that, but if we didn't have the policy, we would have had a great depression. >> if you look at the -- do you feel there is an articulated conservative economic policy that is an alternative to what the democrats are proposing or is it all no, no, no? >> well, there's mitt romney that's implying maybe he'd do something similar to what the democrats did but not quite. a lot of what the democrats did was stolen from george w. bush and mitt romney. tarp and the auto bill began with bush. stimulus is not a particularly conservative -- or liberal policy, bush had his stimulus and others were saying we needed
a tax cuts stimulus for that recession, so one of the problems republicans have, not so much romney, but the rest of them, is they have opposed to everything the obama administration did, but the obama administration, in trying most everything, has taken off the table a lot of what their republican party wanted to do, so they are not left to many solutions. right now they are opposing payroll tax cut. >> newt gingrich is the only one dissenting on that, which is fascinating. ezra klein, columnist for "the washington post" and bloomberg, ezra has been guest hosting on the martin bashir show here at 3:00 p.m. eastern and doing a spectacular job of doing it. still ahead, ed schultz, eugene robinson, and how the president is taking a turn in his politics, a turn that should make happy the people in his own party who have criticized him for being too soft on republicans. we have the evidence on tape. that's ahead. on c, making some
news about the nation's footing and expectations regarding a potential terrorist attack. >> the biggest concern we have right now is not the launching of a major terrorist operation, although that risk is always there. the risk that we're especially concerned of right now is the lone wolf terrorist, somebody with a single weapon being able to carry out wide-scale massacres of the sort that we saw in norway recently. you know, when you've got one person who is deranged or driven by a hateful ideology, they can do a lot of damage, and it's a lot harder to trace those lone wolf operators. >> the president's new remarks echoing those of his own justice department, which just recently warned of lone wolf style attacks, like the president mentioned.
the president also telling cnn today there might be a little extra vigilance in monitoring potential terrorist risks as the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches. we will be right back. ugh, my feet are killin' me. well, we're here to get you custom orthotic inserts. we can't afford that. yes, we can. dr. scholl's custom fit orthotic center. foot-care scientists are behind it. ( man ) you have flat feet... no way... way. orthotic 440 is recommended. it recommends the custom-fit orthotic insert that's best for your feet. you'll get all-day relief. for your tired, achy feet. and you could save a couple hundred bucks. sweet. this is great. dr. scholl's custom fit orthotic center. thank you... who are you talking to ? for locations, see drscholls.com.
earlier this month on the occasion of president obama's 50th birthday, we did a review on this show of the vast conspiracy theory that barack obama is not who he says he is, that he is secretly foreign and therefore, secretly not really president of the united states, and his fake birth certificate that made it seem like he wasn't foreign is really part of an elaborate plot hatched in 1961
to do something, not quite sure what, but it definitely sounds bad. because president obama released a second form of his hawaiian birth certificate this spring and promptly decided to launch the mission to kill osama bin laden in the same 48-hour period, it has been sort of nice to know that as president obama is running for reelection this year and next, at least we won't have conservatives this time around questioning his americanness. at least that's over. oh, wait. >> i think you want a president that is passionate about america, that's in love with america. i know what this country needs. >> asked later to clarify what he needs by saying america needs a president that's in love with america, presidential candidate and texas governor rick perry rather doubled down.
>> no, you need to ask him. i'm saying you're a good reporter, go ask him. >> you're a good reporter, go ask the president if he loves the country. that's what a good reporter should do, because i don't know if he loves the country. apparently, it is going to be another year like that, birtherism is dead, long live the president's secret foreignness. the filing deadline is not until november, right? maybe there's still time for orly taitz to get in. right now joining me, eugene robinson. eugene, i'm glad i could persuade you to talk about this, thank you for being here. >> it's good to be here. >> how does one prove that you are in love with america? >> well, as you know, the traditional way, and actually the surist way is with a bumper sticker. see, the president has this new
bus, right, the souped-up bus, he could put a really, really big bumper sticker on the back that says i heart america and everybody would know. >> when rick perry said this today, particularly with a follow-up question, i don't know, you're a good reporter, go ask him. it struck me when i saw it as old school, the return of orly taitz, the respectable right might be over now, might be embarrassed by. but we saw carl rove, others on the right, upset about what rick perry said about bernanke, nobody peeping about this, does that mean it's back for the campaign? >> i'm not sure it's actually back. it might be in rick perry world, right? he's in the -- in the past two days he's demonstrated why people, republicans i know in texas, have said this guy is going to blow up. it may be that this is just who
rick perry is, that these intemperate things he says are, yes, part of his design, but, in fact, are off the -- just out of bounds and are going to get him in serious trouble. i don't think the carl roves of the world like going back to this mean, i think it's been done, and he killed osama bin laden, so it really doesn't have the kind of traction that it once had. >> when you're talking about republicans who are skeptical of rick perry's chances and see a line like this as something indicating he's not going to last in the long term, i see it as evidence of his discipline, he's going to run with the you come down to texas, we'll show you what a f.e.d. chairman has to face when he does something i can't explain about federal policy, military doesn't respect america, he never served in the military, he's just going back to old school stuff, he's going to stay disciplined with it, and it doesn't strike me he's
responding to the outrage over these comments as if he's made a gaffe. >> no, he certainly is not, but texas politicians that succeed in the rest of the country tend to modulate their texasness a little bit, they tend to speak in language the rest of the country gets, so when you talk about ben bernanke in terms of a lynching, and when you go back to this old, and frankly tired, canard about the president's love for america, i'm not sure that if this is, indeed, by design and discipline, i'm not sure it's a good idea. i think if he wants to stick around in this race, he's going to have to dial it back. he may never apologize for these things, but saying them again, i, you know, if he's going to keep hitting on this, not sure it's a good idea. >> i wonder if there's room here for a democratic countercharge, what do you think the effect would be if the president actually engaged on this and
said you know what, america, we're tired of having our patriotism questioned because we love america in a way the conservatives -- is there room for that sort of countercharge? have politics changed enough to capitalize against him on this? >> i think there may well be, and i'd love to hear the president give that speech. in fact, he's given any number of speeches before and since becoming president that were just brimming and oozing with his love for this country, so he certainly laid the groundwork for any such speech and attack campaign he would go on, and i think it would be great. it would at least flush out the other republican candidates and force them to take a stand and say, you know, what do you think about the president's love of america, democrat's love of america, and let's get this on the table, good idea. >> you know, i have to say if that happened and the other
candidates were questioned about that, it gives them an opportunity to say rick perry, you can be the wing nut guy, i want to be a serious candidate now, and it gives them a chance to do that. >> exactly, could make michele bachmann seem reasonable. >> oh, please. eugene robinson, pulitzer prize winning columnist for the post. thanks for your time, gene, i appreciate it. the best new thing in the world today will not be the best new thing in the world today for your arteries or waistline. for everything else, pure, delicious awesome. that's coming up at the end of the show tonight. when i got my medicare card, i realized i needed an aarp... medicare supplement insurance card, too. medicare is one of the great things about turning 65, but it doesn't cover everything. in fact, it only pays up to 80% of your part b expenses. if you're already on or eligible for medicare, call now to find out how an aarp... medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company, helps cover some of the medical expenses...
not paid by medicare part b. that can save you from paying up to thousands of dollars... out of your own pocket. these are the only medicare supplement insurance plans... exclusively endorsed by aarp. when you call now, you'll get this free information kit... with all you need to enroll. put their trust in aarp medicare supplement insurance. plus you'll get this free guide to understanding medicare. the prices are competitive. i can keep my own doctor. and i don't need a referral to see a specialist. call now to get a free information kit. plus you'll get this free guide to understanding medicare. and the advantages don't end there. choose from a range of medicare supplement plans... that are all competitively priced. we have a plan for almost everyone, so you can find one that fits your needs and budget. with all medicare supplement plans, there are virtually no claim forms to fill out. plus you can keep your own doctor and hospital that accepts medicare. and best of all, these plans are... the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp.
when they told me these plans were endorsed by aarp... i had only one thing to say... sign me up. call the number on your screen now... and find out about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan. you'll get this free information kit... and guide to understanding medicare, to help you choose the plan that's right for you. as with all medicare supplement plans, you can keep your own doctor and hospital that accepts medicare, get help paying for what medicare doesn't... and save up to thousands of dollars. call this toll-free number now.
the last recall elections in wisconsin are being decided today, in one of the two races, the republican candidate is the author of a children's book called "with my rifle by my side." it's a children's book. results on how that candidate and all the candidates did tonight in wisconsin, that's coming up.
bush's second term as president, everybody knew his vice president, dick cheney, would not be running to succeed him, not be running for president, why did we know that? we just knew that. there was going to be a primary in 2008 for the democrats and a primary in 2008 for the republicans as well, wide open on both sides, there was a lot to pay attention to that election cycle, but this year after about 14 seconds of cable news chatter about whether president obama would get a primary challenger in the democratic party, ha, everybody turned all their attention to the republican side, because that's what presidential politicking is about this year, it's just the republican side. and as everyone is increasingly riveted by the fight for the nomination among the republicans, even today, august 16, the chat is still about whether more republicans might still get into the race. in this environment where everybody's watching the presidential politicking only on the republican side, in this environment, president obama has effectively started his own
reelection campaign this week. the president embarking on a bus tour of the midwest starting yesterday. >> hello, cannon falls! hello, minnesota! hello, decora! hello, iowa! it is wonderful to be back in iowa. this place is as pretty as i remember it. >> well, everybody in the beltway has been flipping quickly through the coverage of president obama's midwest bus tour to see if he said anything sound byte-y about rick perry, michele bachmann, or mitt romney, what the president has been doing out there is how he's going to be running for reelection. >> i want everybody to understand here that i'm not here just to enjoy the nice weather, i'm here to enlist you in a fight. we are fighting for the future of our country, and that is a fight that we are going to win. if all of you are enlisted in
the fight to make sure that we've got a country that is looking out for middle class families and promoting common sense and thinking about the next generation and not just the next election and is thinking more about country than it is about party and is less interested in vilifying opponents than figuring out how to get something done, then we're going to start electing folks who do that. >> the election itself is not for 15 months, and the president has the luxury of not having to run in a primary against democrats before the general election takes place. but probably the single most important thing on election day that will determine whether or not president obama is reelected is, of course, the state of the economy and jobs. and if the economy and jobs don't get better between now and 15 months from now when the country is voting, who will voters blame for things not being better, and so the president, not technically
campaigning, but heck, traveling iowa by bus, the president is making his case, making the critical campaign-style case for the difference between the parties. spoiler alert, here comes the republicans paul ryan budget vote to kill medicare, listen. >> there are two contrasting visions that are going to be presented over the next year and a half. in this debate that we still have to finish about how to close the debt and the deficit and how we move this country forward. and i'm on the side of a vision that says we live within our means, but we still make investments in the future and everybody pays their fair share and we have shared sacrifice and shared opportunity. on the other side, you have a vision that says we're going to make sure those who have benefitted the most pay the least and we underinvest in education and we underinvest in infrastructure, and we
underinvest in basic research. that's their vision. and we dismantle medicare as we know it and make it into a voucher system. well, that's -- i don't think that's the way america's going to grow. that's not how america's going to prosper, but the only way we're going to be able to win that argument is if you guys make a decision that you want a country that's big and bold and generous and not one that's cramped and just believes in a winner take all economy and which everybody else is left out in the cold. that's not the kind of -- that's not the kind of america that i was raised in. not the kind of america i believe in. >> the main stylistic criticism of president obama from within his own party, from people who say they supported him and still support him, but they want more from him, and i don't mean the disagreements on certain policies, but things about his style as president, the
president has not confronted the republicans enough about their political sins. he is now doing that confronting on what is effectively the campaign trail in iowa. a corollary of that main criticism, again, from within his own party, stylistic criticism of his presidency is republicans have been getting too much out of him in negotiations, that the president ought to say what he wants, what he think the country needs and make the country believe it and make republicans pay a price if they don't go along with it. convert the popularity of democratic ideas into political leverage against republicans, to get his way or at least go down swinging while saying and standing up for what he believes in. he, again, is now doing that on what is effectively the campaign trail in iowa. listen. >> there are bipartisan ideas, common sense ideas, that have traditionally been supported by democrats and republicans that will put more money in your
pockets, that will put our people to work, that will allow us to deal with the legacy of debt that hangs over our economy. we could renew the payroll tax cut that we gave you in december that put $1,000 in the pocket of a typical family. we've got pending trade legislation. congress right now could start putting folks to work rebuilding america. today i'm announcing that we're ramping up our efforts to get capital to small businesses and rural areas. let's give tax credits to companies hiring our veterans, and let's put them back to work and let's let them use their skills to get this country moving again. congress could do that right now. i want to pass a road construction bill to put tens of thousands of people to work all across america. i'll be putting forward when they come back in september a very specific plan to boost the economy, to create jobs, and to control our deficit, and my attitude is get it done, and if they don't get it done, then we'll be running against a
congress that's not doing anything for the american people, and the choice will be very stark and will be very clear. >> don't tell the beltway, because frankly there's no reason yet to interrupt the michele bachmann coverage, but president obama is running for reelection and we now know how he's going to run for reelection. does this show he has taken to heart some of the constructive criticism that's been levied against him from his most avid supporters? joining us now, ed schultz, host of "the ed show," thanks for making the time tonight, i know it's not an easy thing to do. >> thanks, rachel, good to be here tonight. >> are you seeing a shift from the president on this bus tour, or do you think this is a continuation of what he's been say something. >> no, i think the president knows that his base is very frustrated and the worst thing the base could do with the republicans propping up and running for nomination, the worst the base could do is freeze up.
they are not totally happy with the way he has negotiated, as you mentioned in the set-up piece about how he's gone back and forth with the congress. congress is at a 13% approval rating in some polls because they haven't done the job. they've spent their time being obstructionists, and i think this president can't get on the road enough to go out and make the case and reintroduce himself and make sure people know exactly what he's advocating for, but then he's going to ask for the order, telling them he's not going to give up and make it in very clear terms that in his first term as president he had all sorts of olive branchs coming out of the white house, the second time around it's not going to be that way and he needs our help. whether he's going to do it or not, i'm sure he's got plenty of advice coming from everywhere. i'm a cable host, you're a cable host. i supported president obama, i believe in him, but i think it's
time to take off the gloves and flat-out get after it, because these folks are standing in the way of a lot of progress this country could make, which the president just said in those sound bytes about helping the job market. >> the thing i'm hearing from him that sounds the newest to me and most pointed is the last thing we played him saying, my attitude is -- i'm going to put forward a specific jobs plan in september. my attitude is get it done, and if they don't get it done, then, he says we'll be running against a congress not doing anything for the american people and the choice will be stark and clear. that's what you say before i will win. he say i'm going to go down swinging. do you think that's an effective -- effective line to take between now and 15 months from now? >> i think it's very easy for people to understand where he's coming from. i think the president is starting up a narrative, you know, this isn't my fault, you know, i caved in on the bush tax
cuts, i extended them, i didn't go after the employee free choice act, did a lot of good things for wall street, i was out there fighting for the automobile industry. you know, everything else we've tried to do on jobs, they haven't come to the table, and i think people will understand that, but they want to hear a little bit more saying this time around it's going to be different, because i don't think the base, rachel, is going to be overly enthusiastic to be out there campaigning, doing all the things they did in 2008, if it's going to be just more of the same. the base, and i think independents want this president to start drawing some lines in the stand. we understand obstructionism, we understand exactly how difficult the congress has been working with this president. we understand when they call him a socialist and they paint him as un-american. that infuriates, i think, a lot of americans, and i think the president needs to pivot now and be far more aggressive and don't be afraid to point the finger at
the republicans and name names. name the obstructionists. there's a yearning out here in the middle of the country right now for the president to step up and get after it. >> ed, let me ask you about one very, very important part of the democrat's political structure and of the democratic party's base and president's base, unions, upset the president has chosen a non-union state in a city there's not a single union hotel for the democratic convention next year in north carolina. is that a rift that the white house can heal and do you see interest on their part to do so? >> well, i think the white house would be smart to turn to the union heads in this country and ask the question, do you want republicans to win carolina, do you want the republicans to win virginia? the president is good at telling people you're not going to get everything you want, but i would
encourage wage earners in this country to put those kinds of things aside and to look at the big picture. but as i will do on "the ed show" tonight, i will document some things the president has been saying about organized labor and collective bargaining i find very troubling and people in the middle of the country find troubling as well. this president has not delivered for labor the way they thought he was going to, and i don't think he has delivered for the middle class the way they wanted him to, but the landscape, the obstructionism, the record number of filibusters in the senate the first two years has also made it tough for any president to navigate through those waters, but i think that labor, if i had to make a prediction, i think that they will be there for this president when push comes to shove. >> ed schultz, host of msnbc's "the ed show." ed, i got to tell you, i know you've been a strong supporter
of this president and i also know you take policy and the substance and progress issues so seriously that despite the fact that you have been a supporter of him, you've also been one of the most blunt spoken criticism of him, your honesty is something i've respected. thanks for talking about this with me tonight. >> thank you, rachel. >> "the ed show" is here on msnbc after this show. all right, sometimes the job of a reporter in the field is to chart the ebb and flow of political events that define the contours of the american experience. at other times the job of a political reporter in the field is to do this. in the field political journalism is alive and well and risking its health. best new thing in the world today coming up in just a moment, tonight with frosting. 3q double shift... i need a break.
just under an hour ago, polls closed in the two final recall elections. last week it was six incumbent republicans. two of them didn't survive. this week it's two incumbent democrats facing republican challengers. earlier this summer in the first wisconsin recall, another incumbent senator easily beat the republican challenging him. faci a tough challenge.
right now with 19% of precincts reporting, jim holperin has 57% of the vote. his challenger has 46% of the vote. holperin won in 2008. narrowly beating the republican candidate. that district leans republican with scott walker winning more than 57% of the vote there in november. and the conservative supreme court justice candidate winning ten of the 11 counties in the district just back in april. senator holperin's challenger has not held office before, she's a small business owner and author. her most recent book is titled with my rifle by my side. this race in district 12 could have been expected to be close this evening.
at this point it's too el to say whether it will be. at this hour, with 19% of precincts reporting, the incumbent has 54% of the vote and republican challenger kim simac has 46%. the other election district 22. at this hour, we have 14% of precincts reporting, the incumbent senator bob wirch has 44%. the challenger has 56%. senator wirch has been elected four times including in 2004, when he beat the now national republican party chairman. state senator bob wirch's opponent is also an attorney, he's anti-abortion, anti-union and anti-regulation. once again at this hour with 14% of precincts reporting, bob
wirch trailing his challenger. these are early, early returns. in district 22, the victory is going to be short lived thanks to the law scott walker signed last week. both of these guys, the incumbent and his challenger, will be living outside the new district 22 after it is redrawn for the next election. regardless of whether or not state senators hold or lose their seats tonight, republicans will still be in control of the wisconsin state senate, thanks to the results of last week's recall elections, it's been a wild ride in wisconsin this year. we'll be right back and keep you posted.
anthony has left the confines of this show and our high jinx for covering the presidential campaign for nbc news. even though it looks like we were there in the spin room. i need to correct part of that. the producer i was discussing has left this show, and he is an nbc news embed on the campaign trail. in leaving this show, anthony terrell has left his high jinx behind him. watch. >> i am in line to get some fried butter. it's 11:00 a.m. and this is going to be my brunch. thank you. i'm looking forward to this. i had to get a pop to wash it down with. i'm really thirsty. let's take a bite. >> what does it look like on the inside?
>> a little bit of cinnamon. frosting on the interior. it tastes like a pancake, if you will. very soft and gooey. i know my cholesterol levels are going to shoot up. >> look at that. >> gooey. >> that's a stick of butter. yum. gotta love the iowa state fair. >> anthony having his cake and eating too. complete lack of cynicism about every aspect of his job which is covering politics is the best new thing in the world. thanks store staying with us