tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC October 17, 2011 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
but there was a lot more to it. jonathan alter, "bloomberg view," thank you for joining me tonight. >> thanks, lawrence. >> "the rachel maddow show" is up next. good evening, rachel. good evening, lawrence. thank you. and thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. on tuesday january 12th of last year at around 4:50 p.m. local time, the ground began to shake and to shake violently beneath haiti's capital city of port-au-prince. a magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck haiti out of nowhere, like all earthquakes, and flattened nearly every standing structure in sight. among the first images we got out of haiti after the earthquake were images like this one. shaky, sort of grainy cell phone videos that were shot by haitians. >> [ speaking foreign language ]. the world is coming to an end. >> "the world coming to an end" is what you heard her say there. one of the most amazing things about the haiti earthquake,
is that even before news crews got on the ground there we did get all of this incredible raw footage from the disaster area that people could shoot themselves on their own cell phones. they could upload it, send it to friends and circulate it around the world before any mediation could ever take place. it was one of those striking moments when the democratization of pretty high-end technology, in this case cell phones with cameras, really changed the way we were able to see what was happening in this massive disaster in haiti, in real time. it turns out there was also a minor flip side to that phenomenon. one american aid worker from maryland happened to find herself in haiti when the earthquake struck there. she used her cell phone to text her friends and family back home to tell them she was okay. she used her cell phone to post images on facebook so her friends and family would not worry about her safety while there and so she could help document what was happening there. then she came home from haiti to find her cell phone bill for $34,872.
wow. with no warning from her cell phone provider that she was exceeding her international text and data plan, she got hit with a $35,000 monthly bill. which she was legally liable to pay. as of today, cell phone companies being able to do that to you with no warning is over. it's at least coming to an end. today the cell phone industry agreed to start sending alerts to customers who get close to their monthly voice, text, or data limits. this isn't technically a new government regulation that's been put on the industry. this change to protect american consumers has come about only because of the threat of regulation hanging over these cell phone providers. the ideas that these cell phone companies, wireless companies don't implement this change properly to protect consumers from what they were doing to them before, then the government will force them to make these changes. now, make no mistake. this new practice will inevitably hurt the bottom line of the wireless companies. because you know, a $35,000
monthly payment is a really nice return on some woman's cell phone plan for one month. it is very lucrative to be able to charge people huge penalty fees and huge overage charges with no warning, which your customers then are legally obligated to pay. i mean, who wouldn't want a business plan like that? everybody wants the right to maximize their corporate profits. and if you can maximize your maximizing by swindling your customers, particularly your customers who are locked into a binding contract where they have to pay you for the privilege of stopping to pay you, who wouldn't want that? from a corporate perspective, swindling customers this way i'm sure is awesome. it almost makes me want to glue on a fake villain mustache and twirl the ends of it right now just thinking about it. but if something is good for a company's bottom line, if a company can figure out how to make money by tricking americans, by swindling people out of their money, just because a company can make money doing that doesn't mean that that should be a protected practice. somebody ought to take care to ensure fairness.
somebody ought to take care to ensure that fairness even when the swindlers are big, rich powerful interests. somebody ought to take care to protect americans from being swindled by the companies with which we do business. that's why we have regulations and government oversight even when businesses do not like them. today president obama in north carolina made the case for these kinds of regulations, regulations that congressional republicans have proposed eliminating in their latest economic plan. >> turns out the republican plan boils down to a few basic ideas. they want to gut regulations. they want to let wall street do whatever it wants. their plan says we should go back to the good old days before the financial crisis, when wall street was writing its own rules. they want to roll back all the reforms that we put into place. >> now, don't feel bad for the guys who were getting booed there in north carolina. the people who are getting booed there are actually having a great time right now. today, for example, citigroup
announced it has posted a $3.8 billion profit for the third quarter of this year. that is a 74% increase from a year ago and it is the seventh consecutive quarterly profit citi has turned. good times are back at citigroup just three years after they got bailed out by us. they got bailed out with $45 billion of taxpayer money. that reality led to this scene over the weekend at one of the big citibank branches in new york city. about 20 people or so taking part in the ongoing occupy wall street protests arrested by police after marching to that citibank branch on saturday afternoon. among those arrested were actual citibank customers who were reportedly attempting to close their accounts. citibank says the new york city police asked them to close the branch with the protesters still inside until police could arrive to arrest those protesters. here's how some of that scene played out afterwards. >> let them go! let them go! let them go! let them go! let them go!
>> today the occupy wall street movement officially turned one month old. and not only does it show no signs of letting up, but over the weekend the protest that started on wall street started spreading across the globe. more than 900 cities across four separate continents saw protests this past saturday alone. this was the scene at a recent occupy protest in new york city. "i bailed out a bank and all i got was a new debit card charge." occupy cincinnati protesters have been set up in a park in cincinnati much like they are in downtown manhattan. over this past weekend cincinnati protesters, this is sort of adorable, cincinnati protesters got word that somebody was scheduled to have their wedding photos taken in that park. so all the protesters gathered up all of their stuff and left so that they would not be in the way of the wedding photos. but then the bride and the groom showed up to have their wedding photos taken and told the protesters, no, no, no, we wanted you guys in the pictures. the wedding couple sought out the protesters who had gotten out of the way and asked them to be in some of their wedding
photos, which is adorable. less adorable but important in protest terms, cornell west, among 18 people arrested yesterday while protesting outside the supreme court. part of the reason financial interests now have a stranglehold over our political system is of course the way the supreme court took away limits on corporate spending in politics over the last couple of years. so the supreme court, if you care about this issue, is an appropriate place to protest. in terms of how the occupy wall street protests are being received by the public at large, a new poll out today showed nearly 7 out of 10 new yorkers say they agree with the views being expressed by the wall street protesters in their city. if you think about it, new yorkers are the folks who have been contending with what is an encampment in their city for the longest time, since this movement started a month ago. if anybody thought it was going to be aggravating that the people whose city was being occupied, it manifestly is not. the city by nearly 7 out of 10
people is on the occupy wall streeters' side. when asked if they support or oppose tougher government regulations of banks and wall street firms, the home of wall street, 73% of new yorkers in the home of wall street, 73% of new yorkers say they support that tougher regulation. even republicans say they support tougher wall street regulations. so this is it. there's this base question about whether there is any countervailing force protecting americans' individual human interests from really, really powerful, really, really, really rich sometime bad actors who are preying on us and have really hurt individual americans' fortunes badly and who are spending now hand over fist to keep doing that. is there any countervailing force against their interests or isn't there? is there any countervailing force on the part of individual americans? is it possible for politicians to act against the interests of the most powerful corporations when it is in individual americans' interest that they do
so? this really is a 1% versus 99% question. people overwhelmingly, frankly left, right and center realize they have been victimized by an economic system and political system that tilts so disproportionately toward the 1%'s interests. right now democrats are trying to turn the upcoming elections in the direction of that sentiment. president obama gleefully highlighting today the fact the the republicans' supposed jobs plan is mostly just a plan to repeal the dozen/frank wall street reform. it's not like the movement in the streets right now is a big "d" democratic movement. the protesters at occupy wall street aren't exactly delighted with democrats either. so what can democrats do now to show good faith? with all of the wall street contributions that they've got, all the revolving door lobbyist and staff connections they've got to wall street, what can democrats do now if they do want to ally themselves with the message of the "we are the 99%"
movement? what can democrats do to show good faith? what can democrats show they should be trusted even as the protesters seem pretty clear that the republicans can't be trusted? has this created an imperative for the democratic party to prove themselves on this issue in a way they haven't yet been able to? joining us now is a man at the center of this question, democratic congressman barney frank of massachusetts, the ranking member of the house financial services committee and the man who is the frank in the dodd/frank wall street reform legislation. congressman frank, thanks very much for your time. >> you're welcome. >> do you believe that the occupy wall street movement is changing the democratic strategic consideration of wall street and economic populism broadly? do you think it's lit a fire under the democrats at all? >> well, first, i have to say that i wish there was some of that energy two years ago when i was fighting against the people who wanted to protect derivatives from regulation and who were trying to weaken the consumer bureau. rachel, i do have to say, some of us have been trying to do this for a while, and i have to
be honest and say in 2009 i wish some of these people had been energized then and were helping us fight back against this effort. because we got a strong bill, but it should have been stronger. secondly, i will say this, i hope they will, but i want to -- sometimes telling your friends things is tougher than railing at your enemies. not if people think the demonstrations in and of themselves do something. look, let me -- you said protesting at the supreme court is an appropriate way to deal with the terrible decisions they made that allow unrestricted campaign spending. a better way, they're not mutually exclusive, is a president who can appoint justices who won't do that. look at the justices appointed by president obama. justice sotomayor. justice kagan. they won't vote that way. the demonstrations are very important because they give you the potential to mobilize people. but people need to take the next
step and they have to, one, let the people now in office know what they think and, two, vote for the people who do that. in the senate there was just a very partisan vote to put a surtax on income above $1 million. i'd like to go even lower. but that would have been a progressive step. unfortunately, it was filibustered because the republicans voted unanimously against it and all but a couple of democrats voted for it. that wasn't enough. so yes, i hope there will be pressure to do even more, but i, again, want to be honest, simply being in a public place and voicing your opinion in and of itself doesn't do anything politically. it is the prerequisite, i hope, for people getting together and voting and engaging things. and i understand some of the people on occupy wall street are kind of critical of that. they think that's conventional politics. well, you know, the most successful organization in america in getting its views adopted is the national rifle association.
and they are in many cases a minority. but in addition to everything else they do, they very effectively identify who the members of the congress are, the legislatures and vote for them. so as i said, i welcome the wall street energy. i don't agree with everything some of the people say. i agree with the general thrust of it. but it's not self-executing. it has to be translated into political activity if it's going to have the impact. and you know, i would just say, the last thing, we had an election last year in which people who disagree with them and disagree with me and with you got elected. i want to be honest again here. i don't know what the voting behavior is of all these people, but i'm a little bit unhappy when people who didn't vote last time blame me for the consequences of their not voting. >> i hear the frustration in your voice and your appreciation of the complexity here, but i wonder if you think that the occupy wall street protests might help? i mean, if you think about the influence of the tea party movement on the republican party, the tea party movement often had an incoherent and
sometimes laughable message, often a self-contradictory message, and they didn't comport themselves in ways that translated directly to political action. some of them did. a lot of them didn't. but they did really move the republican party. >> no, there i disagree. i agree with you on the incoherence of the message. but they voted. that's -- you say it can help. it can help if people will vote and vote for the people who agree with them and if they think people don't go far enough they vote against them and vote for others. but the tea party -- one of the things we now confront is that the tea party is the dominant voice of the republican party in the house. not because everybody, every republican agrees with michele bachmann but because virtually every republican is afraid of losing a primary to a follower of michele bachmann because of the tea party. so i agree with you in terms of your description of what the tea party stands for. but they did take political action. they were, unfortunately, i think, but they have the right to do it and nobody can
criticize them for exercising their rights, they're a very powerful force in republican primaries. they have had an impact because they vote and then they lobby people. and i understand with some of the wall street protesters there's a sense that that's somehow bourgeois politics or conventional politics. well, sitting in the citicorp isn't going to change votes in congress. i want to change votes. i want to get a confirmed head of the independent consumer bureau. we fought hard for that. i was very proud to be an alife elizabeth warren to get that done. i want derivative regulation to be tough. i want there to be a change in the policy whereby the banks and other financial institutions make loans and then sold the whole loan and didn't have to retain any of it. all those are now being fought about. so i would welcome the allies. but the demonstrations -- and i don't -- the demonstrations are a good thing, conducted properly, but that has to lead to political participation or it won't have an effect.
look, as you know, i've been very active in gay rights. i have the 25th anniversary of my coming out coming up. and there was a big gay rights demonstration a couple years ago around columbus day when washington congress was out of session. and i thought it was frankly a waste of effort. and i said you should instead be going it people in their own districts. and people said no, we're going to go to the mall and put pressure on congress. i said, all they put pressure on was the grass. because they didn't follow it up. those are good ways to mobilize people. but if there is no follow-up in the kind of political action that the tea party engages in, it will dissipate its impact. >> i tend to think that there are intangibles created by direct action that can change political framing and political realities, but i think your argument about how it translates directly is well put, sir. i respect your -- >> can i say two things? >> please, sir. >> first, they're not mutually exclusive. yes. but why not take the second step? and secondly, can i give a photo credit? would you indulge me in a little personal stuff? >> of course. >> the great photo you showed of
our hero, frank camany with president obama and myself and tammy baldwin, can i tell thank you was taken by my partner jim redding. it was a better picture than the one the newspapers used. i'm glad you used it. >> we will post it on our blog with proper credit, sir. >> thank you. >> it's adorable. i appreciate it. thank you, sir. >> thank you. >> congressman barney frank, of course, democrat of massachusetts. all right. law and order. more police on the beat. a wider blue line fighting crime in our cities and our towns. all this should be sweet music to conservative ears. unless the guy hiring those cops is of course president obama. giving them what they want even when they say they do not want it. that's next.
[ female announcer ] starbucks via® is planted the same... ♪ ...harvested the same... ♪ ...and roasted the same as our other premium coffees. ♪ it only makes sense it would taste the same. so, try it for yourself. buy a pack of 100% natural starbucks via® ready brew. we promise you'll love it or we'll send you a bag of starbucks coffee. it's the starbucks via® taste promise. look for it at starbucks stores and where you buy groceries. it's the starbucks via® taste promise.
♪ i couldn't if i tried ♪ eating only tacos ♪ or kentucky fried >> newly discovered video of herman cain in a choir robe appropriating a song by john lennon about world peace to promote instead his mafia-themed pizza restaurants i repeat is not the best new thing in the world today. and that's because we have found something better. i know that seems impossible but it's true. better than that. best new thing in the world today. not herman cain in that robe singing about tacos. it is in fact coming up. >> happy stepchild. ♪ sent her back to college for her sophomore year ♪
♪ co-signed her credit card -- "buy books, not beer!" ♪ but the second that she shut the door ♪ ♪ girl started blowing up their credit score ♪ ♪ she bought a pizza party for her whole dorm floor ♪ ♪ hundred pounds of makeup at the makeup store ♪ ♪ and a ticket down to spring break in mexico ♪ ♪ but her folks didn't know 'cause her folks didn't go ♪ ♪ to free-credit-score-dot-com hard times for daddy and mom. ♪ offer applies with enrollment in freecreditscore.com™.
good news tonight in garden city, idaho. little garden city, you are getting another police officer for the next three years thanks to a new grant from the u.s. department of justice. congratulations, we hear the competition was steep. and hey, good news in muscatine, iowa. you are getting two new police officers, also for the next three years. same goes for urbandale, iowa. two more officers. so the ones you have can go home to their families for supper now and then. tucson, you're a much bigger town with a lot going on. and tucson, you are getting a bunch of new police officers thanks to a grand from the federal government. in fact, congratulations to a very long roster of towns and counties in america. you are this year's winners. you applied for a grant from the justice department's cops hiring program and you won. we are much more used to news about towns cutting back on police and even closing down their whole police departments because they can't afford them anymore, but programs like the
cops program can help these towns and counties. they can use federal money to hire new officers or to keep the ones they have so they don't get laid off. and boy, are these towns and counties psyched about it. last year, for example, oakland, california laid off dozens of police officers, so many that the officers who were left in oakland announced they would no longer respond to a long string of crimes involving burglary and vandalism and grand theft. but now with help from uncle sam the oakland police department will be able to add 25 uniformed officers back to their depleted ranks. when a government looks at what it can do, what is within its power to keep people employed, to help with jobs, the single most direct thing a government can do is, duh, not fire its own employees. so when states and cities and counties were busted by the wall street implosion and the recession and unemployment and tax revenues falling off a cliff, the federal government targeted funds to keep teachers and police officers and firefighters on the job. that's for them, it's for their communities, it's for the economy.
this is a long-standing principle in u.s. policy. but republicans last week voted down president obama's american jobs act including its money for teachers and first responders, to help cities hire them and avoid laying them off. now senate democrats have brought that same proposal back this week as a standalone. federal money for teachers and cop and firefighters. the kind of stuff that's being celebrated from claremont, new hampshire to waller county, texas right now when they can get their hands on federal money. the stuff is popular, overwhelmingly americans say the government should spend more to keep teachers and cops and firefighters on the job. to pay for it, taxes on corporations and rich folks, please. that's what the polling says at least. republicans hate this idea in the abstract. we've seen this movie before, says republican senator john mccain. senate minority leader mitch mcconnell says, quote, "it is disappointing senate democrats are still focused on the same temporary stimulus spending." republicans hate this idea in the abstract, but in the specific it's garden city,
idaho, it's muscatine, iowa, it is urbandale, wa war, it is oakland, california. it is own cold spring, minnesota, where the most emphatic i hate stimulus republican presidential candidate michele bachmann recently requested some of that nice cops program funding. because it was her district. and cold spring could really use that funding. it would be a good use of money there and really help cold spring. it would help. it would. and even as they denounced this thing in the abstract, they know it works in the specific. that vote on teachers and on cops and on firefighters could come as soon as friday.et from ge capital. but they also go beyond banking. we installed a ge fleet monitoring system. it tracks every vehicle in their fleet. it cuts fuel use. koch: it enhances customer service. it's pretty amazing when people who loan you money also show you how to save it. not just money, knowledge. it's so much information, it's like i'm right there in every van in the entire fleet. good day overall. yeah, i'm good. come on in. let's go. wow, this is fantastic. ge capital. they're not just bankers. we're builders. they helped build our business.
exclusive to the military. and commitment is not limited to one's military oath. the same set of values that drive our nation's military are the ones we used to build usaa bank. from free checking to credit cards to loans, our commitment to the military, veterans, and their families is without equal. ♪ visit us online to learn what makes our bank so different. usaa. we know what it means to serve.
the world needs more energy. where's it going to come from? ♪ that's why right here, in australia, chevron is building one of the biggest natural gas projects in the world. enough power for a city the size of singapore for 50 years. what's it going to do to the planet? natural gas is the cleanest conventional fuel there is. we've got to be smart about this. it's a smart way to go. ♪
ice cream. that is cheap. fact. and then i suspended marcia off this bridge and took a virgin her night riding for a while. we never got a dead spirit. we hated it, though. it's disgusting. >> the phenomenon that is badlipreading.com is so far the nation's best result yet for this year's round of presidential politics. i'm glad we learned about the 9-9-9 thing and the weird thing about tim pawlenty and hockey fights. but i'm more glad to find out what bad lip reading can do for, say, michele bachmann. >> mama gets a what what. you know i represent. >> great news today. there is a new bad lip reading for mitt romney this time. including for the first time a lot of really oddly compelling
bad lip reading just of him giggling. [ laughter ] >> i told you it was oddly compelling. mitt romney as interpreted by the geniuses at badlipreading.com. the best new thing in the world today, coming up right at the end of the show. i swear. ♪ we're centurylink... a new kind of broadband company committed to improving lives with honest, personal service, 5-year price lock guarantees and consistently fast speeds. ♪ our neighbors putting their lives on the line. and when they rely on a battery,
there are firefighters everywhere who trust duracell. so, look for these special packs to see how you can help your local volunteers. duracell. trusted everywhere. yeah, maybe not. v8 v-fusion juice gives them a full serving of vegetables plus a full serving of fruit. but it just tastes like fruit. v8. what's your number?
big, big. big big big big? big big big big big. big big...big. ♪ big big big -big. -big! [ cheers and applause ] ♪ big big big -big big. -big! -big -big! -♪ big -big. -big big big. big big big. big big big. small. big big big big. small! [ male announcer ] the space-saving, eco-friendly, totally unique smart. unbig. uncar. ♪ woman: we love ordering sushi, butso to save some money...e. man: looks great, hun... woman: ...and we're not real proud of this. man: no...we're not. woman: we...um... teen: have you guys seen captain stewie and lil' miss neptune? dad: did you look all over the place? under your desk? all around? teen: uh, they're fish, they live in a bowl.
dad: what're gonna do? anncr: there's an easier way to save. anncr: there's an easier way to save. teen: whatever. ncr: 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance. are you ready for the gotcha questions? they're coming from the media and others on foreign policy. who's the president of uzbekistan? all of this stuff. it's coming. and how are you dealing with that? >> i'm ready for the got you questions. and they are already starting to come. and when they ask me who's the president of ubekibekibekistanstan, i'm going to say, you know, i don't know. do you know? >> do they think for a moment that i'm not a student of the position that i seek and that i probably know more about foreign policy than they think? what i'm saying merely is i hope they continue to think that i am foreign policy dumb until the right time. they will find out i'm not as foreign policy dumb as they think. >> what is the right time?
foreign policy is not the grounds on which republicans are choosing their presidential candidate this year. the ubekibekibekistanstan guy is of course herman cain, who is roughly tied for first place now with mitt romney. like mr. cain, mr. romney has zero foreign policy experience for his team of foreign policy advisers as a candidate he's brought back most of the george w. bush foreign policy team. because that worked out so awesome the last time. the only republican presidential c contender with any claim to foreign policy experience is of course jon huntsman, who was the obama administration's ambassador to china and who is currently polling at levels measured in individual supporters rather than in percentages. in one recent poll literally the number of individuals found in iowa to be supporting jon huntsman's candidacy could be counted on one hand. not the percentage. the people. so no, american politics and republican party politics in particular are not this year about foreign policy. if we were debating foreign policy, though, there would be a lot to debate about.
we are at war, of course, in iraq. we are at war in afghanistan. we are at war in libya. and even if we don't call it a war, we are at war intermittently sometimes in pakistan, in somalia, in yemen, now in uganda, in south sudan, in the democratic republic of the congo and the central african republic. last week president obama said he was deploying 100 troops as trainers against a militia called the lord's resistance army in the last four african nations i named. even though this president has pledged to wind down the wars of the past administration, he has started his own wars without much criticism. there's been some criticism on the left and some generalized grumbling. but in the absence of sustained partisan opposition, foreign policy has really gone mostly unsaid, unargued, undebated. but of course there are exceptions. and right now the exceptions are way weirder than that even weird rule. last week, for example, conservative radio host rush
limbaugh tried to find a way to criticize the africa intervention not by saying that intervention itself was a bad thing or the president was doing it wrong in some way. mr. limbaugh's criticism was that the specific militia u.s. troops would be targeting in africa, that militia, those are actually good guys. >> lord's resistance army are christians. they are fighting the muslims in sudan. and obama has sent troops, united states troops to remove them from the battlefield, which means kill them. so that's a new war. 100 troops to wipe out christians in sudan, uganda. >> uganda. i will admit it is true that the lord's resistance army did have the foresight to put the word "lord" in their name, but they're not exactly known as a christian group. they're not like missionaries. they are best known for massacring civilians en masse. tying up men and hitting them in the head with axes. taking women and girls as sex slaves. forcing young boys to become child soldiers. they're considered responsible
for thousands of civilian deaths in central africa. kidnapping, rape, mass murder, reign of terror, child soldiers, the whole kit and caboodle. but setting aside the astonishing exception of rush limbaugh calling those guys good guys because they put the word "lord" in their name, is it a blessing or a curse that we don't really have partisan arguments about foreign policy anymore? republicans don't seem to have it in them this year. but arguments can be beneficial. they can pry loose information about what's going on, what might happen next. right now, for example, the best information we have about obama's foreign policy does not come from political fights over foreign policy, it comes from journalism. journalism like michael hastings' new scoop in "rolling stone," which is the most illuminating thing i have read in a long time on how we go to war now in the obama presidency and why we go to war now. joining us us now for "the interview" tonight is michael hastings, contributoring editor for "rolling stone" magazine. his article about the obama
administration's decision to intervene in libya is in the current issue of "rolling stone." thanks for being here, my friend. >> thanks for having me. appreciate it. >> you explain in your piece the obama administration is motivated to intervene around the world as sort of justifying intervention around the world by this idea of responsibility to protect. can you explain that basic idea? >> sure. essentially you have a group of influential advisers around the president. the president himself, who is very interested in this idea of what -- how can you use american foreign policy might to protect innocent civilians in different countries around the world? the experience in rwanda in the '90s and the balkans in the '90s sort of brought forth this community of foreign policy experts who essentially said, look, we're going to create a doctrine that says if there are innocent civilians at risk in other countries we have a moral obligation as the international community to intervene. >> do you get the sense that the obama administration feels any
pressure over some of the more controversial things they are doing? even in the absence of partisan arguments over those things? for example, we learned this weekend that after we killed an american citizen, anwar al aw laky in a drone strike in yemen, we've also now killed his son, also reportedly an american citizen. the government said he was 21 years old. the family says he was 16. from your reporting on this, does it seem to you like there are high-level struggles in the administration with criticism over things like this? >> i don't think the awlaki issue, there's too much infighting in the administration. i can guarantee you if it was a republican president doing that the democrats would be up in arms. i think the drone strike in particular has a number of very troubling questions to it, but i think politically as a political issue the drone strike issue is a winner, i mean, as -- forget the moral questions for a second. my personal feeling, too, if the president's foreign policy was going to be focused on humanitarian intervention and
these sort of multilateral efforts around the world, say, going in and trying to track down the lord's resistance army -- how rush limbaugh did not realize the lord's resistance army is one of the most evil militias in the world, it's like dude, use the google. but i think if obama, if president obama kept it to those sort of issues, humanitarian interventions, drone strikes, people on the left might be more forgiving. the problem is you still have iraq and afghanistan that are ongoing. the sort of forever wars. and i think that's the key to the -- the president will be judged in the end on whether he can end those wars successfully. >> well, in terms of what you are reporting on what you're seeing with the internal decision-making process in the administration, do you see any evolution in where the -- i guess the political weight is on war issues between the president's decision on afghanistan, say, and the decision he made on libya? is the weight, the center of gravity in the administration changing at all? >> i think so. i think president obama was
burned by the pentagon in the deliberations over afghanistan. what you've seen over the past two or three years is the president really seizing control of his own foreign policy. on the bin laden operation and in libya you had the president overruling some of his top military advisers, going with his gut. so how i like to look at it, if you look at sort of the blank slate foreign policy questions, libya's one of them. and i said the bin laden or the awlaki hit as well, the president's actually done quite well. and he's criticized for this sort of leading from behind. and i don't think that's really true. i think the white house will certainly say this, that that's actually smart and wise leadership. not leading from behind. but i think the weight is clearly moved from the pentagon into the oval office, but it's been a struggle for him to get there. >> the story of that evolution as told by your piece right now in "rolling stone" is really well told and fascinating, and
i'm not sure anybody else is getting that on national security stuff. so congratulations on this scoop, michael. it's nice to see you. >> thanks. and i got -- the book is coming out in january. people in washington are already running for cover. so i hope to be back. >> hey, do you have a title yet for your book? >> it's called "the operators: the wild and terrifying inside story of america's war in afghanistan." >> who do i have to call to get you on as soon as the book comes out? >> just give me a call or text me or we'll do a lip reading thing too and we'll see how it goes. >> all right. we'll do it lip reading video style. excellent. thank you, michael hastings. appreciate it. >> thanks a lot for having me. >> michael hastings, of course a contributing editor for "rolling stone" magazine. best new thing in the world is still ahead. it's as funny as shagging parrots. that's all i'm saying. to build . to build . i hired someone to make my website... five months ago. we are building a website by ourselves. [ woman announcing ] there's an easier way. create your own small-business site... with intuit websites. just choose a style that suits your business,
then customize, publish and get found... in three easy steps. [ bell dings ] sweet. [ announcer ] all from just $7.99 a month. get a 30-day free trial... at intuit.com. so i wasn't playing much of a role in my own life, but with advair, i'm breathing better so now i can take the lead on a science adventure. advair is clinically proven to help significantly improve lung function. unlike most copd medications, advair contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator, working together to help improve your lung function all day. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than twice a day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneumonia. advair may increase your risk of osteoporosis and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking advair. if you're still having difficulty breathing, take the lead. ask your doctor if including advair
could help improve your lung function. get your first full prescription free and save on refills at advaircopd.com. and people. and the planes can seem the same. so, it comes down to the people. because: bad weather, the price of oil those are every airline's reality. and solutions will not come from 500 tons of metal and a paintjob. they'll come from people. delta people. who made us the biggest airline in the world. and then decided that wasn't enough. confidence, with depend in color. now available in gray. looks and fits like underwear. same great protection. depend.
arizona is about 30% latino. alabama is about 4% latino. and so last year when arizona passed the most draconian anti-immigrant law in the country there were large-scale protests in arizona to be sure, but those protests weren't just in arizona. there were protests against arizona's new anti-immigrant law all over the country. there were nationwide boycotts organized against the state of arizona. arizona's anti-imarbitration bill, sb-1070, better known as the "papers please law," frankly became a national issue. more than a year later, after sb-1070 was stayed by the
courts, alabama passed an even more draconian law, a law that essentially makes it illegal to exist without documentation in alabama. your very existence in that state in school and in a car, in a church maybe, could be considered a crime under alabama's new law. and when a federal judge in alabama refused to block key provisions of that new anti-immigrant law, alabama's latinos, all 4% of them, in contrast to the 30% in arizona, they comparatively were kind of just left on their own. many just left altogether, just fled the state entirely. "the new york times" reporting an exodus of hispanic immigrants from one small alabama town. the monday after key parts of the law were upheld the alabama department of education told politico that hispanic students were absent from class at twice the normal rate. now, that doesn't mean they are all undocumented immigrants. but families with even one member who has uncertain immigration status are weighing the cost of things like the kids going to school against the threat of families being broken up. many of those who are staying
are protesting. last week latino students, workers, and business owners in the birmingham area stayed home as part of a boycott organized on spanish language radio. organizers estimate more than 100 businesses were closed as part of the boycott. the guy behind alabama's new anti-immigrant law is also the guy who wrote arizona's "papers please law." he's also behind the new kansas law that says essentially that you cannot register to vote in kansas anymore without showing a birth certificate or a passport. his name is chris kobach. he's kansas's secretary of state. kobach describes the impact of the alabama law so far as "a win." he says, "it's self-deportation." if that's a win from the perspective of kris kobach, what happens next in 4% latino alabama? in part that depends on the legality of what alabama is trying to do. after all, alabama is still having its pants sued off over this. but it goes beyond the legal issue. in part what happens next to the
4% latinos in alabama and to the rest of alabama's immigrants depends on whether or not this starts being treated in alabama as not just a demographics issue but as a civil rights issue, as a broad issue about who alabama is in the 21st century. especially after who alabama was in the 20th century. >> the 16th street baptist church. first colored church in birmingham. everybody's church. through its history, it has always been a focal point for black people as a gathering place for the community. so many of the movements, marches and demonstrations have emanated out of the basement of this church. when the bombing of the church happened right beyond the exit sign, that's where four little girls were killed, murdered in this church. >> it's very serious. this is sacred ground for us. >> as you might marnlgs i knew judge blackburn. we were on the same court together. she succeeded me as chief judge in the court. i'm sure that she ruled in accordance with what she viewed
to be the law. unfortunately, in some very serious ways, she was mistaken. ours is a country really that is based on immigration. we are a nation of immigrants. only two categories of americans don't fall into the category of immigrants, and that is the native americans, the indians, and the black americans. we're the only ones who didn't seek to come here. all of us, black and whites, have to keep working towards making all americans realize that we are all in this boat together. >> that video report produced by the pulitzer prize-winning reporter jose antonio vargas, who in a jaw-dropping "new york
times" magazine piece earlier this year revealed how he himself had come to this country as a child as an undocumented immigrant and he still does not have legal status. joining us now is former "washington post" reporter, the founder of defineamerican.com, jose antonio vargas. jose, thanks very much for joining us tonight. it's nice to have you back. >> no, thank you. thank you for having me. i really appreciate it. >> this law exists in alabama now. in part its future will be decided by the courts. but there's also -- >> yes. >> -- a lot of factors at work here. in alabama what have you been seeing in terms of organizing against it, about its impact on the state already? >> you cannot overstate the impact of this law in the state. and i think more than just the organizing and the boycotting that's been happening, that's been being organized by undocumented immigrants and their allies here in alabama. i'm actually in birmingham, the cradle of the civil rights movement. what's been interesting, because you know, at define american we're all about trying to kind of tell the stories of what's really happening here, are the
stories of like the farmer or the elementary school teacher. right? or actually u.w. clement, civil rights icon, who are connecting the dots and saying that this is a human rights, civil rights issue. i really appreciate you taking the time to play the video because you know, to be sitting at 16th street baptist church, you know, the site of the bombing in 1963, i can't believe that nearly 50 years later -- i mean, yesterday was the dedication of the martin luther king memorial -- here we are talking about an issue that's impacting of course, you know, a specific demographic. and i think the question, you know, here that i've been asking people is is this the real alabama? does this reflect what you want alabama to be? >> judge clemmon as far as i know is the first african-american federal judge in alabama, is that right? >> yes. yeah, nominated by jimmy carter. >> he told you in that striking moment in the video that his
successor for his seat on the federal court, sharon lovelace blackburn, he said she was mistaken in her ruling to uphold parts of this immigration law. >> yes. >> did he give you any insight into how a challenge to this ruling might play out? >> well, i mean, again, back to the civil rights movement of the '60s, this is going to play out in the courts. this is what's going to happen. it's going to play out in the courts. and i think just as important, it's going to play out, you know, in homes, on the streets. it's going to play out in really, again, how we have to reframe, how re think about immigration in this country. you know, it's been really interesting. last night i actually was out at a kohl's department store, right? i wanted to ask just everyday alabamans about the law. and i talked to about six people, five of whom supported the law, but they couldn't quite tell me what was in the law. you know, they didn't know, for example, that it's actually a crime -- i mean, three days ago, what, thursday, it would have been a crime for me as an undocumented immigrant to be in
alabama. they didn't know that. they didn't know that it's a crime, it's a felony for an undocumented immigrant to be actually getting water service because now an undocumented immigrant can't get into a business, you know, entity or contract with the government. i mean, this is a real law affecting real lives. it's not an abstraction. and i think that's something that i think we really need to figure out. i mean, that's what we're doing at define american. >> jose antonio vargas, the founder of defineamerican.com. jose, please stay in touch with us as you continue to work on this. >> thank you so much for having me. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> thanks. >> all right. best new thing in the world is coming up next. [ charles ] when you can make a person smile
when they taste the food that you cooked, it does something to your heart. i think what people like most about the grilled food is the taste. the flavor comes from that oak wood. the shrimp, the fresh fish, the steaks. it locks in the flavor, it seals in the juices so that when you put the fork in it, it just goes through it like butter. it's beautiful. [ laughs ] i'm proud to be a grill master. i love food. my name is charles himple. i'm a red lobster grill master, and i sea food differently. gives you a 50% annual bonus! so you earn 50% more cash. according to research, everybody likes more cash. well, almost everybody... ♪ would you like 50% more cash?
no! but it's more money. [ male announcer ] the new capital one cash rewards card. the card for people who want 50% more cash. what's in your wallet? woah! [ giggles ] always infinity. while most pads contain fluff, always infinity is made with a revolutionary material, infinicel, that forms to your body and absorbs up to 60% more than kotex regular ultra thin. always infinity. [ humming ] and my job is easy. hide big things. you're good... [ crash ] [ laughing ] [ screaming ] [ tires screech ] and if you named your own price on car insurance, you could be paying for this yourself. so get allstate, you could save money and be better protected from mayhem like me. [ dennis ] shop less, get more, make one call to an allstate agent.
♪ let's go ♪ ♪ cruise like a norwegian ♪ the two trains and a bus rider. the "i'll sleep when it's done" academic. for 80 years, we've been inspired by you. and we've been honored to walk with you to help you get where you want to be. ♪ because your moment is now. let nothing stand in your way. learn more at keller.edu. best new thing in world today comes from the folks at badlipreading.com. the same group that gave us these.
>> pressure to put on weight is one of the reasons we have the red sweat suits. there's no way we couldn't. we're creeping between the bullfrogs. >> i went from being too banana plants up to a feed seeding shark that sold pictures of different toys i want. and when i buy stickers for folks in prison, i bring milk, not back yard meth. it's a prison party. >> i'm bored by famine. i cannot wait for a medieval cookie, a cinnabon, hot yellow kool-aid, and save a pretzel for the gas jets! [ applause ] thank you. i wrote that. >> "i wrote that." all courtesy of the emerging geniuses of the 2012 presidential contest, the people at badlipreading.com. okay. this morning we're in l.a. this week, i got to our little office space here in l.a. to start working and i thought something horrible had happened because my boss, bill wolf, was crying at his desk. his face was all red. there's tears streaming down his
face. and i thought something horrible had happened, until i realized that bill was not crying crying. he was crying laughing because this new bad lip reading video had just come out. >> i was happy and then your sister threw a sea fish at my tv. >> hey, how are you? cookies. can i take one? hey. thank you for the bench. don't commit suicide. >> i will force spiders and badgers on the enemy. and get them all to shut up. >> if medina married a real giant, that would be good. at least i think it would. mm. wait no, it wouldn't because never mind. happy stepchild. >> i told you to check it out. oh, hey, this is for the cow. >> in america we have a song. ding dong llama wanny jum wpg an ice pick she thinks i'm going in. >> i'm very good company. [ laughter ] >> be sure the pizza has an old fly in it. >> i didn't spend