tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC May 31, 2012 1:00am-2:00am PDT
fame. >> back when it started on the radio in 2004, there was rachel, there was thom, there was ed, and here we are. >> that's awesome! >> we're still here! >> still here and covering the most important story in the country, that michigan story that nobody else is touching. >> well, you were the first one that got on the benton harbor story. and it has just snowballed, city after city, and there are a number of cities right now that are on the docket, and these folks have done everything they possibly can to get this vote going in november, but of course it's the technicality of the font size. that shows you how determined that opposition really is. >> that's right. thanks, man. and thank you at home for joining us this hour. we've got a big show this hour. the top elections official in any state is usually called the secretary of state. now, that can be a little bit confusing, because at the federal level, the person who has the title secretary of state is hillary clinton. and she's not at all in charge of elections. she's in charge of something totally different. but at the state level, the person who has that same title,
secretary of state, is usually the person who in that state is in charge of voting. in that charge of elections. well, in the great state of indiana, the republican secretary of state this year, a man named charlie white, indiana's top elections official, was convicted of six felonies this year, including voter fraud. ow. prosecutors said that mr. white lied about his own address on his voter registration forms. he used his ex-wife's address instead of the address of a condo he shared with his new fiancee because he wanted to hold on to a thousand-dollar a month gig on the town council in the town where his ex-wife's house was with even after he had moved out of that district. the guy in charge of elections in the state of indiana was found himself to have committed voter fraud. that is very embarrassing if that is your job, right? also embarrassing, the fact that upon his conviction for voter fraud, indiana's republican governor, mitch daniels, refused to appoint a permanent
replacement for him as secretary of state, because, hey, maybe charlie white may be able to get those felonies busted down to misdemeanors on appeal and then charlie white could still serve as state's top election official, despite himself being busted for voter fraud. governor mitch daniels' hopes were never realized. secretary of state charlie white did get busted for felonies, he didn't get them busted down for misdemeanors, he was felony convicted. he was ultimately sentenced to a year of house arrest. and with six felony convictions, charlie white did eventually get fired from his job running elections in the state of indiana. and, no, incidentally, mitch daniels is not now going to be vice president, not with something like that dragging around behind him like a tin can tied to his bumper. but it was such a strange case, right? the top elections official in the state being tried and convicted and sentenced and thrown out of office for personally committing voter fraud. it's rare that you hear about real and not made up cases of voter fraud, but when it does
happen, it tends to look like this. it tends to look like this pitiful charlie white case in indiana. it's weird, it's doing no candidates real benefit. it's a personal thing. and frankly, it's kind of pitiful. here's another potential voter fraud case that fits that same description. republican thaddeus mccotter. he's been serving as a michigan congressman for almost a decade. he might be done doing that now. because this year, congressman mccotter's office failed to turn in enough valid petition signatures to even get him listed on the primary ballot to run for re-election to his own seat. even if you're a longtime incumbent, you have to turn in between 1,000 and 2,000 signatures to get your name on the primary ballot in michigan. and this year of the nearly 2,000 signatures that thaddeus mccotter's office turned in to get him on the ballot, only 244 of those signatures were found to be valid. the state's election director saying that officials found an unprecedented level of obvious fraud in thaddeus mccotter's signatures.
officials found identical petitions that had been photo copied, dates that were cut and pasted on to petition forms, badly cut and pasted on the petition forms. in some cases, the forms were just identical, except for the name of the person who had supposedly submitted the name. there were multiple sheets of the same signatures, as if each was a new. the state attorney general is now investigating this matter as a potential case of criminal fraud. for his indicate, thaddeus mccotter says he is actually the victim here. he says, "somebody either panicked or it was sabotage." thaddeus mccotter says, "my gut tells me that we got lied to by someone that we trusted." ed that thaddeus mccotter says it looks like sabotage. and if that's true, you kind of feel for the guy, right?
you even kind of feel for the republican party here. this was not a race where they thought they would have to spend a dime. this is supposed to be a safe republican district with a longtime republican incumbent congressman in it. but no the republican party's choice is either to dump millions of dollars into that state race to try to save thaddeus mccotter in what is statistically likely to be an unsuccessful write-in campaign to hold on to his own seat or they can try to rally republicans around this slightly eccentric reindeer herder who did manage to get himself on the ballot as a republican, but nobody had heard of before now. it's the wealthiest republican district in michigan. you guys ready to pick the reindeer herder for your congressman? we'll have to wait and see what michigan's attorney general says in this case. but based on the look of the petitions, they've been made public, based on the assessment of state officials so far, based on what thaddeus mccotter says himself, this looks like it was election fraud.
and as election fraud pretty much always is, like that bizarre indiana case, it's rare, it's hamhanded, it's pitiful, and it's no nobody's real advantage, except maybe in this case, to the reindeer guy who might get this seat. election fraud happens really rarely. but once in a blue moon, it does happen. nobody disputes that. except, of course, republicans now say that voter fraud isn't some rare once in a blue moon thing, they say it is rampant, they say it is everywhere. they say it is hugely consequential. it is determining the outcome of elections regularly and it is basically always committed by democrats. >> as you know, house minority leader john boehner has made the call that we should end funding to a.c.o.r.n. and other groups that are engaged in what we believe to be voter fraud. what we want to do is have a thorough investigation. we want to look at stiffening penalties for this group. to say that a.c.o.r.n. is left-leaning is like saying that terry bradshaw may be bald. the reality is that these people have a partisan agenda and what
it is doing is precluding the full operation and the integrity of the balloting process. >> congressman thaddeus mccotter himself inveighing against the evils of widespread voter fraud back in 2008. we need investigations into all these left-leaning groups committing massive voter fraud to advance their partisan agendas to help the democrats. it's rampant on the left. this is what republicans say about voter fraud now. this is how republicans talk about elections. just today, republican party chairman reince priebus raised the very scary specter of voter fraud in republican governor scott walker's upcoming recall election in wisconsin. >> i'm always concerned about voter fraud. i'm always concerned about it, which is why i think we need to do a point or two better than where we think we need to be to overcome it. >> a point or two better. rnc chairman reince priebus saying today that voter fraud is so bad on the democratic side in wisconsin, that the republican candidate needs to win there by
a super extra big margin in order to compensate for all those fraudulent votes that will inevitably be cast for the democrat. one or two points, he says, in a wisconsin election. that means he's talking about something like tens of thousands of votes. extra votes that the republicans need to make up because of all the democratic voter fraud in an election like this. he is that sure that there's that kind of rampant, one-sided voter fraud that it's going to decide the election if republicans don't do something about it. and of course, republicans are doing something about it, all over the country. where republicans are in charge, they are working to make it harder to vote and harder to register to vote. according to the folks at the brennan center for justice, michael waldman was here from that group last night. they're a nonpartisan organization that studies and promotes voting rights. according to the brennan center, at least 180 bills to restrict voting rights have been introduced in state legislatures since the beginning of last year. 180?! 14 states have passed new restrictive voting laws that
could have an impact on this year's 2012 election. these 14 states account for about 70% of the total electoral votes needed to win the presidency. texas, kansas, wisconsin, tennessee, mississippi, alabama, south carolina, and pennsylvania have all passed new requirements to show new documentation that you never had to show before in order to vote now. documentation that hundreds of thousands of state residents do not have. there are new restrictions on early and absentee voting. in ohio and in west virginia and in tennessee, in georgia, in florida. what's the matter with early voting and absentee voting? don't know! maybe it makes voting too easy? but these states are cracking down on it, they are rolling it back. there are new restrictions on voter registration in texas and ohio, in illinois, in maine, in florida. in the iconic swing state of florida, those aren't the only new obstacles to voting there this year. as we have been reporting on the show, florida's republican governor rick scott has started
a push to purge thousands of voters off florida's voter registration rolls, in time for the election. as in all of these cases, the stated goal of this mass effort to take away thousands of floridian's voting rights is supposedly the prevention of voter fraud. in recent weeks, the state of florida has sent local elections officials a list of more than 2,600 registered voter who is the state says are not u.s. citizens and therefore are not eligible to vote and they have to have their names taken off the rolls. election supervisors, in turn, have been looking at those lists and finding tons of inaccuracies. like, for example, maureen russo, u.s. citizen, born in akron, ohio. the state of florida wants her purged off the voting list. bill anturnacorolla, born in brooke lynn, new york, the state of florida wants him purged off the voter list. author guy, seen here posing with his american passport, as well as his local election supervisor, who is a republican,
but who does not want to purge this gentleman off the rolls, even though the state of florida is telling him to. even as local election supervisors from both parties have criticized whatever was the flawed process of putting voters' names on the state purge list this year, florida state officials under republican governor rick scott are going ahead. they're vowing to ramp up the purge now. they are vowing to continue, less than six months before the presidential election, to take people's names off the voting rolls. a state elections official now telling "the miami herald," "i don't have a timetable on when the next list of names will be send to supervisors, but there will be more names." "there will be more names." the state of florida will be targeting more of its voters for removal from the voting rolls. an analysis of the existing purge list already by "the miami herald" found that it disproportionately targets hispanics, democrats, and independents to be purged off the florida voter rolls.
do you think that pattern will continue as the state adds more names to the purge list? or has it just been a coincidence that it has turned out that way so far? joining us now is judith browne diana. he's a civil rights attorney and co-director of the advancement project. she represented the naacp in a 2000 lawsuit to remedy voting rights in florida. thanks for being here. >> thanks for having me, rachel. >> you are much more deeply involved in the vagueries of florida voting law than i am. did i get anything wrong in the way i explained what's going on in florida now in terms of how you understand the facts? >> you got it right. >> okay. it's complicated and it's quickly changing and a lot of this stuff hasn't been debated. it seems to being done at the initiative of the florida governor. is the governor consulting with lawyers in order to -- is this the kind of thing that other states are doing? is this a standard process that
florida's going through, or is this something unusual? >> well, i mean, it's florida taking out their old bag of tricks. and they have come up with a new list and the list is flawed. i mean, a 91-year-old world war ii veteran? i mean, come on. really, governor scott? this is ridiculous. and we're finding that the list, not only is it flawed, but also the problem is that it should be done so close to an election. i mean, when we're changing the rules of how people participate in our democracy right before the election, and doing it illegally and wrongfully, you know, that's got to be stopped. >> when you say illegally, i know that the advancement project, your organization sent a letter to the justice department today, essentially saying that florida was committing voting rights violations related to this purge here. what specifically are they doing that is -- what is illegal about what they are doing and what do you want the justice department to do? >> right. so we've called on the department of justice because the list is about 60% latino voters. and so while we know that the state of florida has targeted
black voters in the past, in 2000 and 2004, they also had a bad felon list that targeted black voters, this time they've come for latino voters. and so what we have said to the department of justice is, it's time for you to step up, because the department of justice can just, you know, just stop this dead in its tracks. and they can do that because the voting rights act allows them to do that because latino voters are targeted. so we've called on them to do it, but we've also called upon the state to stop the letters, to, you know, to cease and desist with the purges, because we know that it's unlawful because it's too close to an election. the federal law says you cannot do these purges so close toon election. and why? because we know that it's often done for partisan gain. and that's what we believe is happening now. >> think about the potential harm here. and even if the state of florida sort of got nailed for doing that. if it was found to be illegal and the state of florida got in trouble for doing it, if that
happens after the election and a voter purge has a desired partisan effect on that election, i'm sure partisan elements in state government in florida would be happy to pay that price, as long as they got what they wanted out of the election. so if the justice department does not choose to intervene here, is there any other remedy to pursue before too much harm is done? >> sure. so we have -- we've called on the state to stop it, and we've given them notice basically saying, you're violating the law and if you don't stop, the next step will be litigation. and if we have to litigate it, we will. and it's important to put this in the larger context. because basically what florida is doing, they're taking one page out of the playbook of voter suppression that the republican party has done this year. you know, it's like -- for them, it's like the left/right and the upper cut, right? the upper cut is this purge, but before this they made it harder to register and made it harder to vote by cutting back early voting. so they're moving forward with just a different page of the playbook, where other states have done voter i.d. as their weapon of choice of voter suppression.
>> you see this, though, as a coordinated effort across states? >> you know, i don't think it's a coicoincidence, by any stretch of the imagination. when you look at what has happened across the country, it's all happening in time for the november election. it's all happening in states where there are republican-controlled legislatures, and they're moving very aggressively, and the targets of them are black latino young voters and elderly who turned out in record numbers in 2008. >> judith browne-dianis, will you keep us appraised of how things are going in florida? thank you. still to come, we have the world's most dubious bus tour. plus the best new thing in the world that has an adorable accent. lots more to come. stay with us. sier and broe... ♪ it's the red. it's the green and yellow. it's the red, white and blue.
because at the olympic games, it's not the color you go home with that matters. it's the colors you came in. and when colors mean this much, you can only trust them to tide. proud keeper of the red, white and blue. actually it can. neutrogena® ultra sheer provides unbeatable uva uvb protection and while other sunscreens can feel greasy ultra sheer® is clean and dry. it's the best for your skin. ultra sheer®. neutrogena®.
when u.s. senators pledged impartial justice in president clinton's impeachment trial, the pens they used to sign that oath said, "untied state senator" on them, instead of "united state senator." it was a misprint by the company that manufactured the mens. it seemed like an omen for how the whole impeachment thing will turn out for those impeachers. last summer when jon huntsman launched his campaign for the white house, his campaign got off to an inauspicious start when the candidate's own name
was misspelled on the press passes that his aides handed out to supporters, it was spelled "john" instead of "jon," which who cares, unless it's the launch of your presidential campaign and you're a relatively unknown campaign. the good news for jon huntsman, his campaign went so badly this year, with he still might be able to run as an outsider nobody's heard of the next time he runs in 2016. for 2012, though, the republicans have got themselves a nominee. last night, by taking the texas primary, mitt romney surpassed the delegate number needed to claim the convention in august. mr. romney is not just the de facto or likely republican nominee, he is the projected nominee. it is official as of last night. mr. romney's campaign marked the occasion by issuing a new iphone app that allows you to superimpose his new campaign slogan, "a better americ," over any photo that you take.
romney campaign's fancy new slogan and fancy new iphone app is spelled a-m-e-r-c-i-a. ameri-cia. a simple mistake. don't take it as an omen. or an oman. spellings are as common as typos. on this show alone, we have made our mistake of shares. our share of mistakes. in typos too. and getting words out of order. sometimes i just stay stuff wrong. last night i said intiminate, when i wanted to say intimidate. but spelling divided by a young age can be a thing of beauty on tv. a thing of joy. it can be the best new things in the world, tonight, on this show. coming up right at the end of the shower -- right at the end of the shoe -- right at the end of the show!
this is a typo. as i mentioned earlier, this is just a really embarrassing, unfortunate, ill-timed typo on the campaign trail today. mitt romney's presidential campaign releasing an iphone app late yesterday that calls for "a better america." at least they meant it to call for that, as you can see here, a typo that no one caught in time, mitt romney called for "a better americia." it did make for a wonderful day
on tumbler, where americia today stood with mitt. this also is a typo of sorts. it's not a spelling thing, but it is pure human error. the half of the internet that was not looking at the new "americia is with mitt" tumbler was instead giggling about this on mr. romney's website, that reads, "as president, mitt will work to expand and enhance access and opportunities for americans to hunt, shoot, and protect their families." those are typos. those are stumbles. this is not a stumble. mr. romney yesterday entertaining the idea of making a background in business a constitutional requirement for becoming president of the united states. this happened at an off-camera fund-raiser last night.
"the new york times" reporting that mr. romney talked about a question he'd got on the campaign trail. "i'd like to have a provision in the constitution, he called the man saying, that in addition to the age of the president and the citizenship of the president and the birthplace of the president being set by the constitution, i'd like it also to say that the president has to spend at least three years working in business before he could become president of the united states." continuing from "the times," "mr. romney did not endorse the idea, but he seemed to like it." quoting from mr. romney, "you see, then he or she would understand that the policies they're putting in place have to encourage small business, make it easier for business to grow." however seriously or hypothetically or just for kicks, mitt romney is publicly entertaining doubts about president obama's qualifications to serve in the office that he now holds. he's wandering out loud whether he ought to change the constitution to make it harder for people whose backgrounds do not like mitt romney to run for office.
and donald trump has become central to the romney campaign. he's given radio interviews for him in every state, while at the same time, mr. trump has resurrected the rattling claptrap about whether mr. obama was, in fact, born in the united states. whether he is, in fact, qualified to be president of the united states. before last night's event in las vegas, the romney campaign promised their candidate would speak up if donald trump raised the birtherism issue at that event right in front of mitt romney where he could see him do it. instead, it was mitt romney who brought up the issue of constitutional requirements for being president in the form of a business resume, suggesting that president obama isn't qualified with or ought to be constitutionally precluded from holding the office. donald trump, in fact, saved the the birther part, not for the fund-raiser, but for his interview on fox later that night.
>> what would it take to convince you otherwise? i know that you're -- are you convinced he wasn't born here or are you suspicious? >> well, i think that it's more likely that he wasn't born here, but i would also say that if you look at his college records, they may have some good information on his college record that would say, place of birth, and it would be very interesting to see what happened. >> so now donald trump and the romney campaign want the president's college records? donald trump asked about those before last year, supposedly because he wanted president obama to prove that he belonged at columbia and at harvard. now he wants to look through the president's college records for clues that maybe the president wasn't born in america in the state of hawaii, because even though the president last year released a long form birth certificate showing his father was born in kenya and he was born in hawaii, a birth certificate is no longer good enough for the romney campaign and their most high-profile surrogate. a birth certificate is not good
enough for donald trump. you want to see what else surfaced yesterday from the mitt romney for president campaign? mitt romney's birth certificate, showing his father was born in another country, but mitt romney was born in this one, in the usa, just like barack obama's birth certificate shows. the reuters news agency asked for the romney birth certificate last week, and here it is, released publicly on a day when mitt romney's surrogate in chief is out suggesting that barrett certificate for the president is not enough. donald trump is useful to mitt romney. and donald trump says the birther argument is useful. and now the world has mitt romney's birth certificate, which keeps that argument going, thank you, mitt romney campaign. by playing along, the mitt romney campaign is piping that argument from the sea of kookery into the conservative mainstream, and thereby into the mainstream media that does with the conservative mainstream tells it to do. you can still find household name republicans who rue the decision by john mccain not to join the birther argument in 2008.
they're willing to say that decision may have cost john mccain the '08 election. you can hear republicans weeping over this in obscure tea party meetings, like the one where former congressman pete hoekstra of michigan, who's running for senate, the one where he said the federal government needs a birtherism office staffed by the cia and the fbi. you can hear donald trump saying it as he stumps for mitt romney, saying that john mccain and the republicans never should have let the issue go in 2008, saying they should bring it back if they possibly can. after president obama released his birth certificate, the number of people who doubt his citizenship fell a lot and in a hurry. after that, a solid majority of americans said that barack obama was born in america, no matter what the kook end right wing said. the issue was settled and done a year ago. why is it coming back now? and why is mitt romney helping?
he'd won his previous race by a whopping 29-point margin. but then, then, congressman braley started seeing ads like this one run in his home district in iowa. >> for centuries, muslims built mosques where they won military victories. now they want to build a mosque at ground zero, where islamic terrorists killed 3,000 americans. it's like the japanese building at pearl harbor. the muslim cleric building the mosque believes america was partly responsible for 9/11 and is raising millions overseas from secret donors. but incredibly, bruce braley supports building a mosque at ground zero. tell braley what you think. >> incredibly, incredibly. remember the ground zero mosque nonsense? do you remember all that? the ground zero mosque controversy was a media sensation in the summer of 2010. even though the building in question was neither a mosque nor was it located at ground zero. but that summer democratic congressman braley campaigning for re-election all the way out in iowa was being bombarded with
tv ads like that on that entirely made-up issue, as if it was a real issue and as if he had anything to do with it, which he did not. it is the kind of thing a candidate might want to fight back against if he had any idea who it was who was fighting him that way. as you can see at the bottom of the screen there, the ads were being paid for by something called the american future fund. and this group, the american future fund, didn't just run the ground zero mosque ad against bruce braley, they ran all sorts of ads against him. tv ads, radio ads, robo calls, good old-fashioned mailers, everything. millions of dollars in ads and attacks spent in his iowa district against bruce braley by this group. even though he had won his previous race by 29 points, congressman braley only narrowly survived this assault in 2010. he had won by 29 points before. in this same district, he barely squeaked by with 2 the% this sometime around. so who did that to bruce braley? who was putting up the money to run tv ads and radio ads and robo calls against him?
where did that money come from? largely, it came from here. a p.o. box located in the lonely boulder hills post office on the outer edge of phoenix, arizona? the america future fund, it turns out, which paid for that spending blitz against congressman bruce braley got a majority of its funding that year from a pretty much unknown pop-up organization known as the center to protect patient rights. have you already forgotten the name that i just said it? don't worry, you're supposed to. and don't bother trying to google that name, they don't have a website. they don't seem to have much of anything. when you try to find out what this center to protect patient rights is, who they are, what their agenda is, pretty much all you can come up with is this, p.o. box 72465, phoenix, arizona. this group that is funding ads against democrats across the country, it's a tiny mailbox located in this post office
outside the desert in phoenix, arizona. where does a post office box get tens of millions of dollars spend. the "los angeles times" wrote about this post office box. they wrote today that that lonely post office box managed to shell out $55 million for conservative groups across the country in 2010. $55 million, funding ads like that one they aired against bruce braley in iowa. beyond that p.o. box, nothing much is known about the group. they're supposedly run by a phoenix-based republican consultant, who is a key operative in the koch brothers' political activities. but in terms of where they got their $55 million to spend on that election, who knows? according to the center for responsive politics, the donors to this p.o. box in phoenix that's supposedly an organization, quote, are almost entirely unknown. such tax exempt organizations must detail the groups to whom they gave grants, but not the sources of their funds. so, tada.
all voters get to know about whoever's trying to proverbially kill congressman bruce braley with millions of dollars in false ads and mailers in iowa, is that they're housed here in arizona at a nice little post office. where's the money from? who's going after him? who do we blame for the ads being false? talk to the p.o. box, america, that's all you're getting. thanks to the conservative majority and the united states supreme court, this is the american political system now. unlimited and untraceable money. you are not a candidate running against some other candidate. you're a candidate running against a void that you cannot name, that you cannot fight back against, because you can't name it. that you probably cannot keep up with dollar for dollar. it's not the age-old problem of running against somebody who's got deep pockets. that's an old problem. our new problem is where you don't know how deep those pockets are that you're runing against. you don't even know who's pockets they are. if you like the way that's already been working in these first couple of years after citizens united, you're going to love how it plays out for the rest of this year. today politico.com reports that
groups on the republican side plan to spend $1 billion -- that's billion with a "b" -- to defeat president obama this fall, and that is not including what the romney campaign will spend. $1 billion is an impossibly large number to wrap your minds around in politics. but here's some perspective, karl rove's group alone are planning on spending as much money this time around as john mccain's did last time. and the koch brothers are planning on spending $400 million, from them alone. more than the whole john mccain spent in '08. how do outside groups on the democratic side plan to compete with that? at least for now, they don't. one labor leader telling politico.com for their story today, "we're not making any attempt to match american crossroads or any of those groups with tv ads. progressives can't match all the
money going into the system right now." so how do you possibly compete and win against all that dark money piled up against you? let's ask somebody who knows. joining us now is iowa congressman, targeted by those ground zero mosque attack ads, bruce braley. congressman braley, thanks for joining us. >> welcome home, rachel. great to have you back in washington, d.c.. >> did i get the facts right about what that race was like in 2010? >> you nailed it. it was one of the most unexpected outcomes of any political race. nobody was tracking me as a vulnerable candidate. and then this mountain of secret cash came flowing down into my race and it was -- i became the poster child of the bad aspects of citizens united, which is the worst thing to happen to democracy, i think, in my lifetime. >> how was it different to run against dark money like that rather than just running against an opponent who you can identify and you know how much money they've got, because your
fund-raising totals are public? >> well, in the past, campaign contributions have always been subjected to sunlight. so if you wanted to find out who was supporting me or membership opponent, with you could go to the fec website and find out where every dollar came from. after citizens united, that money did not have to be reported. it was secret. in fact, with all these groups you've been talking about used that as a recruiting tool to get people to give money. the assurance of secrecy allows them to make these donations without worrying about any negative consequences to their businesses, which would happen in people knew that they were funding attack ads against candidates like me. >> so you think there's a connection between what the ultimate message of the ads are that this money funds, the accuracy, even, of these ads. there's a connection between that and the fact that the money comes from an untraceable source? >> absolutely. because you can't hold somebody accountable for lies and misleading statements when you don't know who they are. and you showed the post office box in phoenix, during the middle of all this.
i went to the only known address for the american future fund, which was a p.o./u.p.s. drop box across from the des moines airport. and i walked in and i went up to the counter and i asked to be shown to the offices, and the woman behind the counter laughed. and she said, you're not first one to ask. >> wow. and you had a big margin of victory in 2008. 2010, you did win, but it was a much smaller margin of victory. obviously, it was headwinds for democrats all across the country in 2010, so maybe some of it was that, but some of it's got to be this money too. is there a way to use this sort of dynamic that you face towards your advantage? is there a way to campaign against that dark money being run against you? or is, essentially, the damage done once these ads flood the airwaves? >> well, they were very sophisticated in how they ran these attack ads against me. they waited until late in the cycle when most people had written me off as not having a tough race and then they unleashed the the avalanche. and by the time the word got out, it was almost too late for
me to get any assistance from people who could help me push back. so the difference this time is, we see this tsunami coming at us. and democrats have always relied on a strong grassroots effort to try to mobilize and get people to see what's at stake in these elections. now, we can see that very powerful moneyed interests are trying to buy the government they want and have no restrictions, literally, on what they can spend. and that's why americans have to wake up and realize, they need to be asking the tough questions. when they see these ads on tv and they have innocuous names, paid for by the american future fund, most people don't realize that this is really a very highly coordinated effort to try to get rid of people who speak truth to power and aren't going to be swayed by some of these powerful special interests. >> democratic congressman bruce braley of iowa. i feel like we've been covering
the best new thing in the world is coming up. nna direct y ♪ ♪ to check your credit score before it gets too late ♪ ♪ and you end up strapped for cash ♪ ♪ patching your board with duct tape ♪ ♪ so hit free-credit-score-dot-com ♪ ♪ find out what credit's about ♪ ♪ or else you could be headed for a credit wipeout ♪ offer applies with enrollment in freecreditscore.com™.
on in the great state of wisconsin right now, and they have nothing to do with one another. they are two separate, independent, unrelated stories. two circles that are not overlapping. there's no venn diagram here. first the recall of republican gov scott walker. on the right of him is his democratic challenger, tom barrett, the mayor of milwaukee. there's only been three governors recalled in the history of the country, and never in wisconsin. even with a governor as unpopular as scott walker, whose short tenure in washington has turned the state inside-out. this recall is still going to be tough going for the wisconsinites who want walker out of office. a democratic poll by solynda lake put barrett and walker in a dead heat today. a marquette university poll that they are testing because the sampling put him ahead of barrett. the polls, no matter who they favor day-to-day, are sort of hard to fall in love with.
off cycle elections are hard to poll. offcycle recycle elections held in the summer. it's really hard to poll. both sides know it's going to depend on turnout. the recall election is on tuesday, six days from today. that's one story. now, as promised, on a totally unrelated note that has nothing at all, nothing whatsoever to do with that first story, nothing to do with the potential recall of the wisconsin governor, totally different story, couple of guys getting a lot of press today. scott walker's biggest potential allies and their group launched a super fun wisconsin bus tour today. cities in four days, starting now, six days before the scott walker recall election. the bus tour is not at all related to the election. and it's not at all election related theme is a better wisconsin. the group will also be bussing in people from illinois for at
least one of their wisconsin rallies. they say food will be provided at these rallies. of course, the buses free. these guys are not wanting for funding. they never have been. the coke brothers american for prosperity ten city bus tour to rally conservatives in wisconsin this week before the election has nothing to do with the election. that's what americans for prosperity says. they say, quote, we're not dealing with any candidates, political parties or ongoing races. we're just educating folks on the importance of the reforms. americans for prosperity is not advocating for scott walker, okay. yes, yes, they're last bus tour last year was called the stand with walker tour. but that should not at all be confused with this current tour, which has nothing whatsoever to do with standing with scott walker, who happens to be up for recall on tuesday. wow, what a coincidence. if this bus tour actually had anything to do with trying to rally the conservative vote for scott walker with advocating for scott walker in that election that is tuesday, that of course would be illegal. the coke brothers group could
lose their tax exempt status if they did something like that. if there's one thing the coke brothers hate. if there's one thing the coke brothers might launch a bus tour to fight against, it's the prospect of the coke brothers paying taxes. so for now we have to pretend like the timing of the bus tours and the rallies right before the election, funded by scott walker's billionaire oil benefactors programs is just a coincidence. which it might be. wisconsin is a lovely state to drive around. especially this time of year when the flowers are blooming and only the fourth governor in u.s. history could be put out before his first term is done. but what about your wrinkles. neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair. it has the fastest retinol formula available. it's clinically proven to visibly reduce wrinkles in just one week. "why wait if you don't have to."
it's time to get going. to have the energy to keep up with your kids. to step up to a new challenge. it's time to start gellin' with dr. scholl's and feel the energy from your feet up. thanks to the energizing support and cushioning of dr. scholl's massaging gel insoles, your feet will feel so good you'll want to get up and go. best new thing in the world today. kahuna. a noun meaning a preimminent american of thing. the national spelling bee is the big kahuna of spelling bees.
278 spellers, all under the age of 16, competed in the first rounds of the national spelling bee today in maryland. the finals are tomorrow. you may have heard about the speller this year who is 6. a 6-year-old girl named lori ann madison. she's the youngest participant ever. she made it through round two today. she stumbled in round three. seriously. ingluvies. i think probably wrong. even though it's called the national spelling bee, interesting note, it's not only for american kids. every year there are a handful of kids from other countries participating in the bee. and this year that handful includes this young man, 13-year-old ryan mcclellan. he hails from new zealand. to get what kind of challenge that fact poses at the national spelling bee. consider for a moment the new zealand accent, as demonstrated
by the geniuses on flight of the concord. >> weaving is a man's game. >> you put a woman in front of a weaving machine and just watch her go. >> no, honestly. my dad weaves. my grandfather was a weaver. >> i thought your dad was a sheep lawyer. >> during the day. but at night he weaves a lot. and i come from a family or weavers. >> i've never seen a man weave. >> i love weaving. i'm weaving at the moment. >> now, if you are a 13-year-old kid at the u.s. national spelling bee and you have an accent like those guys on flight of the concords, what happens when you're asked to spell taupe. torp? taupe. what? >> taupe. taupe is a light brownish-gray.
>> is it french? >> it's from french, which formed it from a latin word. >> torp? >> no, taupe. torp? >> taupe. >> tarp? >> that's his pronunciation. >> t-a-u-p-e. taupe. >> that's his pronunciation. the judge there trying to save this kid from a potentially fatal error. it's not torp. it's taupe. he knows it's taupe. he's just from new zealand. he's chipping at the bit to spell it. that's champing, by the way. this 13-year-old is in tac