tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC September 1, 2012 3:00am-4:00am PDT
and main street found its might again. and main street found its fight again. and we, the locals, found delight again. that's the power of all of us. that's the power of all of us. that's the membership effect of american express. we're a little bleary, but it's sort of in a good way. this is sort of an exciting time of year if you're into politics. we have reached half time of the 2012 convention season. the republican convention finishing up in tampa. the democratic convention started on tuesday. campaigns in general, particular conventions in particular of a bit of an endurance sport. you give speech after speech, shake hand after hand, have to beg for money and manage leaks and put out fires. it's exhausting.
whatever you think of the people at the center of these gigantic sometimes hyperproduced events, the people at the center of these things are just people, and people get tired. and when people get tired, they sometimes say things in a way they did not intend to say them. witness florida republican senator marco rubio, who did not get picked for vice president this year, but who did get the job of introducing mitt romney late last night in tampa. listen closely to how mr. rubio wraps up his big speech here. >> let us make sure they write that we did our part. that in the early years of this new century, we lived in an uncertain time. but we did not allow fear to cause us to abandon what made us special. we chose more government instead of more freedom. >> did you catch that bit at the end? we chose more government instead of more freedom. we chose mitt romney. >> we chose more government instead of more freedom. >> unless the republican party has gone reverse gult on us, i
think marco rubio meant for that line to go the other way around. in fact, today, he said he meant for that line to go the other way around. he meant to say we chose more freedom instead of more government. it was late. i totally understand what happened. then there was congressman paul ryan, the guy who was supposed to sell the world on the big guy on the top of the ticket. rip momny, what was it? >> it's also going to be a speech where people get to know the man rip nominee. >> rip nomny. last night when the entire rachel maddow show also could have used a nap, we had that clip on a permanent loop. i'm afraid my brain is now wired to say rip nomny. it's just as easy to say. if i do that later tonight, i'm sorry. i very much sympathize with candidates who get tired. i woke up this morning and
looked at my alarm clock for several minutes with no idea what this thing was, trying to figure out why this thing i had never seen before was making this awful noise and what it wanted of me. no idea. all i had to do was cover the coen imagine how bushed the guys are who are in the middle of this. this is how mitt romney stard his day, with a sendoff in lakeland, florida. listen closely to what he says here. >> we understand how washington works. we will reach across the aisle and find good people who like us, want to make sure the company deals with its challenges. we'll get america on track again. >> we'll make sure this company deals with its challenges. this comp -- what? >> we'll find good people who like us, want to make sure this company deals with its challenges. we'll get america on track again. >> america is not a company. and does that mean mitt romney wants to fire all of us?
like he fired workers at a lot of those businesses, bain capital bought so he could turn them around? >> these guys are tired. they're all tired, but in politics, it doesn't matter how tired you are. really it does not matter. after their respective conventions in '08, the democrats and republicans raced off to shake hour hands and make more speeches. the last balloons probably hadn't been pulled down from the ceiling and barack obama was in pennsylvania and michigan. and john mccain was in arizona and new mexico and missouri. take a breath but keep running. momentum is everything at times like this. that is usually how it goes. after a day of campaigning planned for ohio and florida with his running mate tomorrow, mr. romney is instead going to be taking some nap time. the weekend after the gigantic hyperproduced marathon commercial for why the american public should fall in love with mitt romney and vote him into office, the romney/ryan campaign calendar has a lot of empty
space on it. no events announced for sunday, no events for monday. they say actually, they have no next events announced at all. presumably, they will announce some before too long, but for right now, for the long weekend, the campaign appears to be more or less down for the weekend. at the very moment when campaigns try to rocket themselves to electability on the pure fuel of intention and donors writing checks. at that moment when they race from the convention hall to tour the factories in swing states, at the very moment that thing is finally fully incon electrovertably on, the republican presidential candidate this year is headed for the porch and a glass of lemonade, but you can be sure he'll turn this company around. we don't know yet whether the convention itself gave the romney ticket a lasting bounce in the polls. the first poll results we have do not yet include today, friday, so they may not factor
in mr. romney's speech, for that matter, clint eastwood's conversation with that chair late last night. this is gallup's daily tracking poll from the first days of the convention. it shows no change in the race. the romney campaign got better news from another survey. going the to the convention, the reuters poll had obama leading romney by four points, halfway through the convention, romney was up by two, which is a six-point swing. a new poll shows he's actually down to a one-point lead. so it's not much compared to the 11-point bounce that john mccain got from his convention in 2008, but you got six points, maybe you got five, at least in this one poll. that means you have some wind in your sails. time to maximize, capitalize, turn this company around. get on the bus, right? choosing not to campaign like mad when you finally have momentum seems strange to my,
especially for this campaign. they have operated so far with what looks to be a sharp understanding of the math that goes into winning elections. they have to understand momentum, right, they sure ly understand geography. it's not an accident that the party held its convention in florida which had not hosted a convention in 40 years but has voted for the winner of the presidential election for the past 40 years and where barack obama now leads in the polls by an average of one single point. republicans lost florida last time but not by a lot. they would very much like to win florida this year. putting the convention there was no accident. since the '08 election, republicans have passed laws in florida that changed voting a lot in that state. for one, they cut the time for early voting. also the republican governor in florida has conducted a purge of the voting rolls. last july they signed a law making it harder to hold a registration drive for new voters. they feared it would
disproportionately affect minority voters who tend to lean democratic and they appear to be right. they released remarkable new analysis on voter registration in the state of florida. we talked about this a little during the convention, but i think this is amazing. have you seen this graph? coming into the '04 presidential election. before the '04 election, this is what the increase in voter registration looked like in florida. democrats in terms of registering new voters had an edge of 40,000 voters. in 2008, it surged again, this is the work the parties are doing to register new voters. for this election, started in 2011, starting with the time when florida republicans made it harder to vote in the state, here's what the comparable numbers are for this election? oh. republican voter registration, the red bars, they have carried on as normal. look at the blue lines. democratic voter registration has absolutely fallen off a cliff after these changes in florida. by the florida times union's count, it is frankly practically
disappeared. on wednesday, on the second day of the republican convention in florida this week, a federal judge said he would permanently block florida's new law that makes it harder to register voters in the state. the law had been put on hold by a court in may, and the news this week, the new ruling means that the law is not coming back. and you know, looking at those numbers, look at '04 and then '08 and then 2012 in those blue lines. maybe the damage is already done for democrats. maybe they cannot catch up. or maybe they can if they try, if they move fast. the legal hurdles that explain why this graph happened in all likelihood, those are now gone. the republican ticket is not taking up the space they usually would with a string of post convention rallies, right? so they had an opportunity here, especially after holding the convention there. they're sort of petering out, taking the weekend off after saturday? maybe the other side's ground game has a chance if they're quick, if they think they can. i think what happened in florida is a test for democrats. if they want to hold on to
florida, they have a chance, but boy do they have to show voter registration game if they want to get it done. also this week on the day mitt romney was nominated, yesterday, a federal court blocked a new law in texas that required voters to show documentation in order to vote that voters never had to show there before. the federal court in washington, d.c. said the placed a strict unforgiving burdens on the poor. and in texas, as in many places, the poor are often minorities, that matters in terms of the discriminatory intent behind the law. texas republicans have said they would repeal this ruling. it looks like registered voters in texas will be able to vote in november without the strict and unforgiving burdening of texas republicans' new law. texas is not considered to be a swing state like florida is, but to the extent more nonwhite texans will be taking part in elections without barriers to them doing so, texas frankly could be a swing state by 2016. at least the democrats keep saying it could be a swing state
by then. and a different panel of judges from the same court that made that decision about texas, a different panel of judges from the same court is now considering whether or not to block the law that makes voting harder in south carolina as well. and more today, friday, we have news today from ohio. the swingiest swing state of all where republicans tried, you will recall, to cut early voting in half. they had to settle for cutting just the last three days of early voting. they had early voting on weekends and early voting on the last three days before the election in plenty previous elections without trouble, but they tried to cut it off for november. now, it looks like ohio republicans are going to have to settle for nothing at all, for no cuts to early voting. a federal judge ordered ohio to put back those three days of early voting that the republicans had cut. not just put them back for overseas military voters, put them back for everyone. almost 100,000 people voting during those last three days
last time, and many of them were african-american ohio voters. so the game just changed in some must-win states. to the extent that this campaign was going to come down to not just how well you politicked in these states but how well the game had been rigged, the rigging has changed. and so this is a test. once again, of politics. can democrats take advantage of it by putting the states even more in play than they might have been able to before these burdens were taken away? democrats and voting rights activists have pushed back against the republican efforts to make voting harder in places like ohio and in places like florida and they're having success. vice president biden stumped in lordstown, ohio. president obama will show up monday in toledo, ohio. we have an idea of what happens when you make voting harder. we don't know what will happen this year when places who made voting harder suddenly make it easier again. joining me is duneta judge.
she's lead attorney in ohio for the advancement project. i should tell you, there's so much news out of ohio that she was the lead attorney on another case decided in ohio this week that says the state can no longer throw out your ballot if you accidentally vote in the wrong precinct. thank you for being here. you're involved in a lot of the intricacies of a lot of these matters. did i explain anything wrong? did it seem roughly correct? >> in ohio, in terms of the provisional ballots, the provisional ballots that are cast in the wrong precinct due to poll worker error. that's a huge distinction. there were 13,000 of those ballots that were thrown out in 2008. now the court has basically said, when a voter has done everything they possibly can, they have taken their personal responsible as secretary husted often says, they have registered to vote, showed up at the correct polling place and then
directed to the wrong precinct through no fault of their own. you can no longer throw out those ballots. >> that had previously been the way that ohio was operating, that even if it was no fault of your own, they told you to vote in the wrong place, that would result in your ballot being thrown out, but that will now be counted as a provisional ballot, as a properly ballot? >> it was a provisional ballot. cast in the wrong precinct will not be thrown out if in fact it was poll worker error. ohio law is very clear. the poll workers have the responsibility to direct voters to the correct polling place. they also have the responsibility to make sure their provisional ballot application is completed correctly. that's another provision of the lawsuit that was just passed. that provisional ballots that do nod have the signature in the right place or maybe left their name off but you can still determine who the voter is, you can no longer throw out the ballots. that was a huge, huge win for ohio voters and ohio citizens
because ohio tends to cast more provisional ballots than any state in the country other than california. something like 200,000 provisional ballots in 2008. >> wow. in terms of the ruling today from the federal district court judge, there has been a hugely politicized fight over early voting in ohio. we have sort of been tracking the twists and turns including seemingly very partisan terms in ohio. if early voting has been restored in ohio by this ruling, how much risk is that ruling at? is there enough time between now and the election that an appeal can happen or some other legal matter can happen that can stop this from going into effect? >> there's a good risk, as a matter of fact, as i was sitting here this evening, attorney general dewine has announced they will appeal this decision to the sixth circuit. there's a huge possibility that, you know, we will be in court again fighting this battle, but again, we will urge the courts to really uphold the decision of the lower court that really protects the fundamental right to vote in ohio and giving the
ohio voters an opportunity to vote in that last weekend where so many voters really came out and cast ballots. and disproportionately african-americans were among those voters who voted that last weekend. and that's a crucial weekend prior to an election to decide that you do not want to have early voting, and especially when you have had it previously. >> yeah. that's the part of it i don't understand. it's not like there's ever been a problem with early voting before, right? >> no, no problem, but of course, we had an opportunity to see in 2008 who came out to vote. >> that was the problem. >> that was the problem. that was the problem. >> defined in partisan terms. here's the issue about reporting on voting rights. so the voting rights stuff is so blatantly partisan when you step back and you realize it's all republican states doing this all in ways that disenfranchise typically democratic voters, but
the arguments from the republicans are always about the threat of voter fraud. as much as you debunk the idea that voter fraud is a spector in the country looming over the elections that is affecting the outcomes, if they can can find one case somewhere, one very hairy sounding allegation somewhere, they can sort of distract the argument with those claims. on early voting, that has nothing to do with even a red herring called voter fraud, right? is there any practical argument against early voting that makes any sense from the other side that is not just about keeping democrats away from the polls? >> no, there's no practical argument, and what the laws are are the right wing politicians manipulating the voting laws because they know who is voting. and so basically, they have no real argument other than to throw up the red herring voting fraud and it may exist if in fact you're manipulating politicians who are manipulating elections, then there may be some issues and concerns there. but ultimately, elections have to be free, fair, and
accessible, and basically, that's what these decisions said this week, is that the courts are going to uphold our democracy, and they're going to uphold our fundamental right to vote in this country. >> and seeing it in texas, seeing it pending in south carolina, seeing it in florida, seeing it in ohio, and all of these things are appealed and all of these things are in still in the process of a certain extent, seeing democratic rights, in the most fundamental of all of our democratic rights supported in this way by the courts, it's getting close to the election to have this up in the air, but it's heartening to see this defense of the rights. you're part of that. thank you for being here. lead attorney for the advancement project in ohio. thank you for your work. thanks for helping us understand it. >> thank you for having me. >> all right, so this thing called clint eastwood happened. it definitely happened and it will certainly never happen again the way it did last night. as we carve that moment into the mt. rushmore of wackadoodleness in american politics, there's something substantial to
understand about what happened with the eastwood debacle last night. it's not about clint eastwood the person, not even about what he said on stage. it's about how it happened and what the implications are for the campaign. it's coming up. as part of a heart healthy diet. that's true. ...but you still have to go to the gym. ♪ the one and only, cheerios is now in our new starbucks refreshers™ -- a breakthrough in natural energy. made with real fruit, starbucks refreshers™ are delicious low calorie drinks you can feel good about. ♪ rethink how you re-energize. ♪ get a boost of natural energy with a new starbucks refreshers™, in three ways. natural energy from green coffee extract, only from starbucks.
designed for women's health concerns as we age. it has more of 7 antioxidants to support cell health. one a day 50+. to support cell health. ♪ atmix of energies.ve the world needs a broader that's why we're supplying natural gas to generate cleaner electricity... that has around 50% fewer co2 emissions than coal. and it's also why, with our partner in brazil, shell is producing ethanol - a biofuel made from renewable sugarcane. >>a minute, mom! let's broaden the world's energy mix. let's go. here's the thing about clint eastwood that went so badly wrong for the republican party and the mitt romney campaign last night. it's the timing. the campaign, the party obviously, they want maximum political impact from their nominating convention. to get maximum political impact,
they need maximum exposure. they need a ton of people watching, right? i mean, the conventions don't really do any work anymore. they're just three-day long infomercial parties for the party and the candidate. and when they are showing off their candidate and putting him in the best possible light, that is the key to this whole event. that's what they want tens of millions of americans to see on tv. now the broadcast network s do not cover the conventions all that much. cable networks like us, we cover it all day and all night, pretty much. but as much as we like to think of ourselves as the center of the universe here on cable, the truth is that the great bulk of the audience that sees the conventions sees it when the broadcast networks put it on. nbc, cbs, and abc. that's where millions and millions and millions of people are watching. and in particular, millions of people are watching who aren't otherwise interested in politics. it's just what's on. the networks put the convention on typically for one hour a night. 10:00 p.m. eastern is that hour.
so nbc airs "saving hope" from 9:00 to 10:00, but at 10:00, they switched over to the convention. on abc, they aired something called "rookie blue" from 9:00 to 10:00, and then 10:00, convention time. so because the one hour the network show is the 10:00 p.m. hour, the big speeches at the conventions are scheduled for that 10:00 p.m. hour. every year since the 1980s, that golden, priceless broadcast network coverage of the nominee for president giving his speech, every year for nearly 30 years, that broadcast coverage and that particular hour has included a heartwarming video introduction of the candidate, and these things are great. if you like political ads, these are the best political ads on earth. they sort of look like documentaries, but they're ads, and they're note perfect. they're letter perfect. to make the country love the candidate, and to make you at least want to stick around to hear the candidate's big speech.
even the candidate introduction films from the bad campaigns are good candidate introduction films. this is good stuff. this is the best the campaign can do. so this has become sort of the way you do this in politics. in the magical 10:00 p.m. coverage that you've got with all of the broadcast networks, you get in maybe an introductory speech by someone else, maybe you do that. you get in the candidate's speech itself, but it's key, it is what the whole week is for. it is key, you also definitely in that hour, get in the video. last night, the romney campaign did not get in the video. and we knew ahead of time they had planned it that way. and it seemed like a bizarre decision even before we understood why they were doing it. >> all right, here's what we know about the order of business. we're sort of going up the on ramp onto the main event. what is due to happen right now
is a video, which we think is a video tribute to mitt romney. here's why i'm saying where think and it seems weird because as far as i understand the order of business, video followed by mystery guest, spoiler alert, clint eastwood, followed by marco rubio, followed by mitt romney. doesn't the video always go right before the nominee as the inspiring thing? we're not going to have a video to get us psyched about clint eastwood, are we? it was not. it was a video to get us psyched about mitt romney. it was a good ten-minute introduction video for mitt romney that was really well done. really might make you like him even if you didn't like him already or haven't been paying attention and fell asleep for a second at the end of "rookie blue." they had this done, ten-minute film, but they did not air it during network coverage, so most people did not see it. it was done by the time the networks started covering the convention. they had scheduled it to run before the networks were switching over to convention coverage. for a specific reason. they did that in order to make room in the golden hour, in the
network coverage hour for this instead. look. to be announced. their big surprise. a to be announced speaker. a surprise, wow, and then of course, they blew the surprise. word about who it was going to be leaked out a day early so there was no suspense at all about who the suspenseful speaker would be, but apparently they thought it was going to be so good, this speaker was going to be so good, it was worth putting this on during network coverage of the final night of the nominating convention instead of the beautifully produced note perfect, emotional introduction of the candidate they had ready to go. they did not put that on broadcast television. instead they did this. >> so mr. president, how do you handle -- how do you handle promises that you've made when you were running for election? and how do you handle -- how do you handle it? what do you say to people?
do you just -- you know, i know people are wondering. you don't, you don't handle it, okay? somebody had a stupid idea of trying terrorists in downtown new york city. maybe that would work. i've got to hand it to you, i've got to give credit where credit is due. you did overrule that finally. and so now we're moving onward. i think that mr. romney and mr. ryan are two guys who can come along. i'm speaking out for everybody out there. thank you. >> so the whole thing where he is addressing mr. president, an empty chair sitting next to him, the empty chair bit, him interviewing the empty chair as if in the empty chair was president obama, and then he was pretending that the invisible president in the chair yelled at
mr. eastwood he should go f himself and to shut up. that was like the big -- that was the big joke. so that's what the romney campaign chose to broadcast to 25 million people about mitt romney's campaign for the presidency. what they did last night is a political disaster. this is unheard of. these are the mitt romney campaign strategists who could conceivably be responsible for this. eric fehrnstrom, stuart stevens, russ schriefer, and matt rhoades who is responsible for everything, so i guess it's his fault. an exasperated senior adviser to the campaign was asked who was responsible for the clint eastwood disaster. the response was, quote, not me. continuing from the times, in late night interviews, aides called the speech strange and weird. one described it as theater of the absurd. these are romney staffers saying
this about the thing that happened in the last hour on network television of their nominating convention that they have presumably been working on for years. so who is responsible for this? how did this happen? continuing from the times, a senior republican involved in convention planning said mr. eastwood's appearance was cleared by at least two of mr. romney's top advisers. and then later in the day, stuart stevens himself threw the candidate under the bus. stevens telling buzzfeed that mitt romney loved the clint eastwood thing, quote, i was backstage with him and he was laughing and he enjoyed it. stevens said. adding that the candidate thanked mr. eastwood for coming. this is not about clint eastwood. this is about the romney campaign blowing their biggest moment in the campaign so far. the biggest audience they will ever have to present their unrebutted best case for their campaign. if nobody gets fired for this, what does that say about who is
in charge over there? whoa! don't want you spilling that hot latte on my driver's seat. this is my car. who are you? i'm the second owner. the what? i will own this car after you. look, i'm not telling you how to drive our car. our car? if you're gonna have a latte in the car, keep a lid on it. it's a cappuccino. still needs a lid. [ male announcer ] the highest-quality cars plus an exceptional certified pre-owned program. good news for the second owner. take care of my car! [ male announcer ] experience the summer of audi event by september 4th with 1.9% apr for 60 months and a complimentary first month's payment on certified pre-owned audi models.
this week in tampa, the republican party was like the grapes of wrath at an occupy protest and the inscription of the statue of liberty all mixed up into one. they should no longer be called the gop, the grand old party. it should be called the phm, the party of the huddled masses. >> my dad got his first job when he was 6 years old. >> my dad never finished high school.
>> my dad was a truck driver. >> my dad grew up in poverty. mom also came from nothing. >> working poor parents in a meat packing town. >> as a widow with seven children. >> basement apartment. >> tiny two bedroom house. >> single mother. >> working class. >> came from nothing. >> she got on a bus. >> took three different buses. >> every week day for years. >> every day to get to work. >> cleaning sheep pens. >> a poor farm boy. >> working on the railroad. >> a welsh coal miner. >> mopping floors, tending tables, tending bar. >> paycheck to paycheck. >> $10 in their pockets. >> making 50 cents an hour. >> as a teenager with nothing, not a penny. >> you know, give them a break. if you're nominating thurston howell for president, you would make your convention sound like that, too, right? distract, distract, distract. but the republicans did not just play the opposite game on the issue of class. and the subject of mitt romney's money.
they also did it on the subject of your money as well. and your fate, particularly if you're an old person or somebody who plans to be an old person some day. that story is next with paul krugman. stay with us. ♪ why should saturday night have all the fun? get two times the points on dining in restaurants, with chase sapphire preferred. the economy needs manufacturing. machines, tools, people making stuff. companies have to invest in making things. infrastructure, construction, production. we need it now more than ever. chevron's putting more than $8 billion dollars
wç are so amazingly good, real. ...that make a real difference. you'll get lost in an all-beef hot dog world. what was i supposed to wish for? why am i wearing a bow-tie? where did i leave my bicycle? after all, when you're enjoying the beefiest, juciest bite of pure kosher beef, nothing else matters. goodness gracious, that's kosher. with no fillers, by-products, artificial flavors or colors. hebrew national. the better-than-a-hot dog- hot dog. why not get buried in something other than work? get two times the points on travel, with chase sapphire preferred.
it is best not to lie. obviously, for moral and ethical reasons, it's best not to lie. one of the practical reasons it's better to tell the truth than it is to lie because if the thing you're saying is not a thing that actually happened, if you have to make something up, concoct a story in order to explain something because it's not true, you're committing yourself forever to remembering what that story is that you just made up. the truth is just the truth. you never have to give it a second thought, but a lie is something you is to remember forever or you will get caught. so do you create a pneumonic device to remember it, do you write the lie on your hand to remind you, get a tattoo? remember a lie your entire life is a difficult thing to commit yourself to. now, in politics, in terms of lying, it's one thing to get away with little explanatory lies and exaggerations nobody is going to ask you again. everyone expects those from politicians.
maybe you can get away with those. but if a fundamental thing in your campaign, a main pillar of what you're running on is a lie, then that's a problem. because not only do you have to remember what the lie is, but so does everybody else. if you're a national campaign, have a ton of surrogates, a ton of other people, a ton of elected officials trying to get you elected and they're going to be asked about this thing that is a main pillar in your campaign and what you're banking on if it's a lie is everyone remembering the same lie. for months, for years, forever. what are the odds that's not eventually going to fall apart if people are going to be asked about it every day, and a lot of people are asked about it every day? today it fell apart a little more for mitt romney and paul ryan when eric cantor forgot what the lie was. the lie in question is that the republicans think it's awful that president obama is cutting $700 billion out of medicare. this is a lie because paul ryan has called for the exact same cuts to medicare.
so clearly, they do not think they're so bad. somebody forgot to remind eric cantor of how exactly you explain that lie. asked about the inconsistency of ryan attacking cuts his own plan embraced, mr. cantor said, quote, the assumption is that, uh, the, again, i probably can't speak to that in an exact way so i better just not, he said. eric cantor forgot the lie. what screwed eric cantor up there, what he could not remember, the appropriate lie about is what nobel prize winning economist paul krugman called the smaller lie of romney and ryan on medicare. that's the small lie. but what paul krugman says is the big lie is this. >> medicare is a promise, and we will honor it. a romney/ryan administration will protect and strengthen medicare.
>> if you were running a son of a zillionaire second generation zillionaire presidential nominee this year, you would have a convention about your party's up from the boot straps story? sing manile moms and immigrants working double jobs. if you were run the kill medicare guy as your vice presidential nominee, you too would have your convention about how much you love medicare and want to protect it. as paul krugman writes today, quote, the republican party is now firmly committed to replacing medicare with what we might call voucher care. they would give you a voucher that could be applied to the purchase of private insurance. if the voucher proved insufficient to buy decent coverage, that would be your problem. over time, the republican plan wouldn't just end medicare as we know it. it would kill the thing medicare is supposed to provide. universal access to essential care. that, i think, even eric cantor could remember.
paul krugman joins us for the interview next, in just a moment. most of the pain i experience is neck pain that also becomes headaches. i was very skeptical about aspirin. bayer advanced was completely different. it really did get rid of the pain. put bayer advanced aspirin to the test for yourself at fastreliefchallenge.com. [ laughing ] ...is the crackle of the campfire. it can be a million years old... cool. ...or a few weeks young. ♪ [ laughs ]
away beckons from orion's belt. away...is a place that's closer than you think. find your away. for a dealer and the rv that's right for you, visit gorving.com. ♪ i can do anything ♪ i can do anything today ♪ i can go anywhere ♪ i can go anywhere today ♪ la la la la la la la [ male announcer ] dow solutions help millions of people by helping to make gluten free bread that doesn't taste gluten free. together, the elements of science and the human element can solve anything. solutionism. the new optimism.
and the family car to do an experiment. we put a week of her family's smelly stuff all in at once to prove that febreze car vent clips could eliminate the odor. then we brought her family to our test facility to see if it worked. [ woman ] take a deep breath, tell me what you smell. something fresh. a beach. a clean house. my new car. [ woman ] go ahead and take your blindfolds off. oh!! hahahaha!!! look at all this garbage!!! [ male announcer ] febreze car. eliminates odors for continuous freshness, so you can breathe happy.
princeton professor of economics international affair, a contributor to the occupy handbook which i own in hardbook and out in paperback because it is just out in paperback. thanks for being here. >> hi, there. >> political, the republicans say they have fought the medicare issue to a draw. they don't have political liability on the issue because they have convinced people president obama would hurt medicare more than they would. what is your reaction to that? >> it's amazing. they might be right on the politics, but in policy terms, of course not. the obama is proposing some cost saving measures, which are also exactly the same cost saving measures that ryan assumes in his budget. and then of course obama is trying to preserve medicare as what it is, which is something that guarantees essential health care to older americans, which we should have for everyone, but anybody, at least for older americans, it's a right. republicans are saying we'll give you a voucher and you can deal with the insurance company. it's your problem.
>> in terms of the political allegations back and forth, one man's cost savings measures are another person's dastardly cuts. in terms of what president obama is proposing, do you think there's anything wrong with it? >> if you look at it, the cost-saving measures, no benefits are cut. benefits are expanded. they're all reductions in payments to insurance companies and hospitals. on the insurance company side, it's reducing overpayments. there's a program that has turned out to be a huge boondoggle. small benefits, in return for a lot of taxpayer costs. they're going to say we're going to stop subsidizing that. it has to compete on a level playing field. and then the hospitals would be paid less, but they have agreed to that. the hospital industry said, we're going to have more patients because people will have insurance. we'll have fewer uninsured people so we're willing to accept slightly lower rates. this was a perfectly reasonable way to save a fairly modest amount of money over the next ten years.
amazing it has become -- well, it's because republicans are so good at making people think they're going to take away your money and give it to those people. if you look at it on its own merits, it's a totally reasonable set of modest cost reduction measures. >> and they're winning on the politics because what we're talking about is what president obama did on medicare and not what paul ryan did to voucherize it. >> that's right, and i don't know if it will last, but that statement, we're going to keep the promise of medicare. the promise of medicare is if you have a medical emergency, a necessary treatment, it will be paid for. and that promise is explicitly taken away. the promise instead is, we will give you some money that maybe will help you to buy an insurance policy from a private insurance company. that's not the promise of medicare. >> in terms of the economics of a voucher proposal like that, in
human terms, it's hard to imagine. i imagine myself 88 years old, and i'm going to get a coupon and shop on the private market for insurance because i have a discount coupon, and so maybe someone will want to pick me up as an 88-year-old pensioner. it's hard to imagine in human terms, but in economics terms, there any reason to believe that putting someone in the market with some subsidy would be more efficient and bring down costs? >> this is amazing because this is a case where conservatives not just extreme ones, won't take no for an answer. we have lots of head to head comparisons of private insurance and it always ends up being more expensive. you can see that. we've got medicare advantage, running medicare through private insurance companies and turned out to be a money losing proposition for the taxpayer and medicaid versus private insurance. medicaid is a lot cheaper. there's the international thing, every other advanced country relies on government provision
of health insurance than we do and much cheaper health care than we do, with no difference in quality or better quality. so you look at -- it's not like you have to go to tim buck too to find this out. go to canada, over the last four years, canada had lower growth in health care cost and half as much per person we do. same health care outcomes as we do. socialized health insurance. what more do you need? >> it works country to country and comparing two different systems within the same country and private part of medicare to the public -- >> that's right. there's not one example that i'm aware of that shows what republicans insist we should be the belief on, which we completely overhaul our medicare system. >> the democrats will have done their job if what we're talking about is the voucher idea of paul ryan's. paul krugman and contributor to the new paperback version of the
occupy handbook. good to see you. >> thank you. >> republicans wish the term legitimate rape and man who said it would be scrubbed from the election cycle and wish that enough to be introducing jokes now about murdering him. it's awkward but that's next. you do this every morning? it's the only way to get fresh coffee. not in my house! this new flavor lock pack from maxwell house helps seal in freshness. wow! that is fresh! am i still yelling? [ male announcer ] maxwell house flavor lock. always good to the last drop.
who have used androgel 1%, there's big news. presenting androgel 1.62%. both are used to treat men with low testosterone. androgel 1.62% is from the makers of the number one prescribed testosterone replacement therapy. it raises your testosterone levels, and... is concentrated, so you could use less gel. and with androgel 1.62%, you can save on your monthly prescription. [ male announcer ] dosing and application sites between these products differ. women and children should avoid contact with application sites. discontinue androgel and call your doctor if you see unexpected signs of early puberty in a child, or, signs in a woman which may include changes in body hair or a large increase in acne, possibly due to accidental exposure. men with breast cancer or who have or might have prostate cancer, and women who are, or may become pregnant
or are breast feeding should not use androgel. serious side effects include worsening of an enlarged prostate, possible increased risk of prostate cancer, lower sperm count, swelling of ankles, feet, or body, enlarged or painful breasts, problems breathing during sleep, and blood clots in the legs. tell your doctor about your medical conditions and medications, especially insulin, corticosteroids, or medicines to decrease blood clotting. talk to your doctor today about androgel 1.62% so you can use less gel. log on now to androgeloffer.com and you could pay as little as ten dollars a month for androgel 1.62%. what are you waiting for? this is big news.
starts with arthritis pain and a choice. take tylenol or take aleve, the #1 recommended pain reliever by orthopedic doctors. just two aleve can keep pain away all day. back to the news. texas governor rick perry was at the republican convention to support mitt romney for president, but these comments did not help. >> would you ever do this again? >> absolutely. i think -- >> you might run for president again? >> there's a long time until 2016 and a lot of good things can happen. my plan is for mitt romney to win and for him to get the country back on track. i'll keep running the best state in the nation. >> 2016? that means mitt romney is going to win and you're going to
primary him after his first term or you think mitt romney is going to lose so you'll be ready -- you're telling reporters that at romney's convention? rick perry, you were not a good candidate but you are an even worse surrogate. it was rick santorum, the runner-up from the primaries who got a speaking gig at the convention. mr. santorum used a teleprompter and gave a very good speech. that was very well received. no single line of it was more well received than this one. >> i thank god that america still has one party that reaches out their hands in love to lift up all of god's children, born and unborn. >> big applause, the big show of enthusiasm for not just rick santorum but for rick santorum talking about abortion and
criminalizing abortion. that was one of the breakthrough moments for social issues at this whole convention. republicans were very careful to stay away at the convention from the party's newly uniformed hard line stance on social issues, they have prioritized it so much over the years but do not want to talk about it when it comes to the presidential race. there was that rick santorum line and one line from mike huckabee in his speech. a six-word sentence from mitt romney and on leak reference to the god of life from paul ryan. otherwise they kept away from social issues and plans to criminalize abortion. most of although, republicans did not want to talk about todd akin, the missouri senate candidate who last week up-ended the political narrative of the republicans heading into their convention when he said this. >> if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. >> although the republicans were seemingly pretty undisciplined
when it came to most of their messaging this week, take, for example, the fact that most of the major speeches were not at all about mitt romney. they were capital r rigorous and on message when they stayed away from the todd akin issue. it largely worked this week. people were not talking about todd akin, he was largely out of the news cycle by the time the convention started. until a reporter for business week sort of snuck into a briefing for zl nar mega donors to karl rove's super pack held at the convention. we got quotable details about how they are making the hard sell to donors about what senate seats they think are winnable for the republicans and aren't using the word socialists against president obama. we have a link to it. but here's the giant political screw-up where they didn't think reporters were present. >> on todd akin of missouri rove
clearly wants him out of the race, the goal is to get other donors to pressure his donors and get him out of the race and used colorful language. we should sink todd akin if he's found mysteriously murdered, don't look for my whereabouts. >> congressman akin's office said they were disturbed by the murder comments but they were sure he misspoke and he called mr. akin to apologize and never would have said such a thing if he had known there's a reporter in the room. sorry, i meant to back stab you, never would have let you know i was back stabbing you, i don't front stab. thank you karl rove. todd akin back in the news just in time for the convention bump? there are a few more weeks in which todd akin can drop out of the missouri senate race. there's no sign he'