Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  August 12, 2013 9:00pm-10:01pm PDT

9:00 pm
what are we going to do as an international community to stand up for it? >> don't do anything. >> i think it would backfire in the rest of the world or in the united states. if we assume that 10% of the population is gay, there's 90% of the athlete the not going to get a chance to compete. how angry are they going to be? who are they going to take it out on? >> this story is going to continue to develop. it's not going to stop here. richard. olympic gold medalist gigi fernandez. and julia with the republic. "the rachel maddow show" starts now. i'm back on my first day and i'm late. i'm sorry. >> it's okay. i missed you so much when you were gone, you can take an extra minute, go. >> thanks. no, go, watch the "rachel maddow show." >> thank you, chris. thanks to you at home for staying with us the next hour. nine months after the presidential elections, republicans have just signed into law the most draconian voter suppression law in the country. this afternoon. before the 2012 elections, republican-controlled states all around the country took action to make voting more difficult.
9:01 pm
like the cuts in early voting that led to waits of eight hours or more to cost a ballot in florida. huge democratic pushback and uproar over the changes in the voting laws, efforts in the republican-controlled states to make voting harder did get rolled back somewhat. they were subject to a lot of human cry. now in the relative calm of this late summer in an odd numbered nonelection year, it is the state of north carolina that has gone further than any other state in the country. in the name of supposedly cracking down on voter fraud, which is never to any significant extent been proven or even seriously alleged in that state, north carolina republicans will now ban you from voting unless you can show new documentation that you never had to show before. and that hundreds of thousands of legal voters in north carolina do not have. and, of course, those voters who will not be allowed to vote without that documentation now, they, of course, are disproportionately minority and
9:02 pm
disproportionately registered democrats. if you live in a state in north carolina and your photo i.d. is your student i.d. from college, you will not be able to vote. you will not be able to go to the polls to cast a ballot anymore. not after the law that was signed in north carolina today. civics teachers and student groups that have been preregistering 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds so they can vote as soon as they turn 18, that is also not going to happen anymore. no more voter registration efforts for young people in north carolina. they dramatically cut early voting. they cut all the early voting on sundays. you've heard of souls to the polls efforts. early voting sundays before elections largely from black churches, not anymore. no more early voting on sundays. what exactly does that have to do with voter fraud? precisely nothing, but it sure will make it harder to vote in north carolina, particularly for groups that tend to vote democratic. something like 70% of african-american voters who voted in the 2012 election in north carolina, 70%, voted
9:03 pm
early. so clearly, early voting's got to go. republican governor pat mccrory of north carolina signed the voting law changes today. he put out a youtube video explaining that it is just the extreme left complaining about this bill. he says making up scare tactics about this bill and really he's just all about protecting the vote in north carolina. by making it a lot harder to vote in north carolina. two lawsuits have already been filed today to stop the new law. a third may be on its way according to reporting. the lawsuits are being filed under a little thing we used to call the voting rights act which is not what it used to be, since the supreme court gutted it early this summer. congress made some noise after the supreme court ruling that maybe they might think about shoring the law back up, but really as you know, congress is not doing much of anything these days. it is times like this when you learn what it really means to be
9:04 pm
the attorney general of the united states and you learn why who is in that job really matters. at more than a surface level, i mean, presumably by the time somebody gets confirmed for a job that important, "a" we know they're qualified to hold the job and "b," what they value, what they believe in, what they stand for. what turns out to be interesting over time, though, is how they act on those beliefs. in that job. how they maneuver within the constraints of the job and the powers of the job to try to achieve their goals. and so after the trayvon martin verdict, for example, there's a department of justice review whether there ought to be federal civil rights charges filed in that case. more immediately, there was the attorney general making an emotional public address using the bully pulpit to say these stand your ground laws that changed the definition of self-defense, they maybe ought to be reconsidered, looked at to see if maybe they are causing more harm than good. on the voting rights act, the sections of that act that had given the justice department the
9:05 pm
power to say thumbs down or thumbs up to whatever states wanted to do about their election laws, the supreme court took that away. the attorney general, eric holder, then said okay, justice will then use the remaining sections of the law to try to uphold the same protections. he said he would transfer resources. he would concentrate resources into the other parts of the law that still remain. so if they couldn't use half the protect voting rights law anymore, well, they'll use the other half. more than they used to. starting with texas and continuing presumably with the other states that had had laws blocked by the voting rights act before the supreme court ruling but now feel like they can go ahead. so texas first. maybe alabama. maybe mississippi. maybe north carolina after today. sometimes you use the bully pulpit. sometimes you have the authority to weigh in and stop something directly. sometimes when you lose that authority, as justice department did during the, with the voting rights act case.
9:06 pm
sometimes when you lose that authority, you instead decide you're going to sue. what is the range of options available to you? and how do you use it? how do you still try to make progress when some avenues toward the progress you want to make are blocked? on the issue of drugs and criminal justice, the obama administration made it a priority to try to reduce the huge disparity in sentencing for crack cocaine versus powder cocaine. i mean, if cocaine is the problem, why be so much more lenient for one variety of cocaine and so much more strict for the other? on that issue, the administration found a lot of allies in congress. the build to reduce those sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, that bill passed by a voice vote in the house in 2010. it passed the senate by unanimous consent.
9:07 pm
because of that, thousands of people who had already been sentenced under the bad old guidelines, they had their sentences retroactively reduced because of that law being passed by congress and signed by the president. the sentence disparity still exists, but it is not nearly as bad as it used to be. that progress was made with congress. there's this range of options. right? there's a range of latitude that you have in the executive branch. that you have as president or the attorney general. and this is some of the most interesting maneuvering we get in american political science. i mean, sometimes you make your case and hope that others will make change. like in the stand your ground speeches. sometimes you urge congress to make a change and they do. sometimes you sue to force a change through the courts. and sometimes you find a way to make the change yourself, even when nobody had ever thought it might be possible. a really dramatic change was made today by the attorney general eric holder. saying that too many americans go to too many prisons for far too long. the attorney general announced today prosecutors will change the way they bring prosecutions for drug crimes starting now. the change they're going to make
9:08 pm
is they're going to not list the quantities of the drugs involved when they bring those charges for some people. ever looked at the different amounts of different drugs that can get you the same sentence? it's weird. a very weird table of stuff. 100 kilograms of marijuana will get you an automatic five years in federal prison without parole. 100 kilograms of pot. for a mere 100 grams of heroin, you get the same sentence. five years in federal prison. no possibility of parole. look at the sentencing for meth. 100 grams of heroin gets you five years all right. you'll do the same time for five grams of meth. with lsd, you get five years in prison for a single gram. all the same sentence for those wildly different amounts of those wildly different drugs. the way the criminal code is written now leads to all of these seemingly arbitrary and sometimes inexplicable results in sentencing between different types of drugs. for what eric holder is saying
9:09 pm
is no particular criminal justice purpose. so the attorney general now is making changes. both in the cases that u.s. attorneys choose to prosecute and in the way they prosecute them. this is not eric holder changing the law. he can't do that. this is him recognizing that the law comes with all these capricious counterproductive consequences. both the differences in the way we mete out punishment for one drug versus the other and the enormous amount of times to which we sentence nonviolent, sometimes low-level offenders. in order to side step that, eric holder told the u.s. attorneys today, told prosecutors around the country today, as long as we're talking about nonviolent people, people not in gangs, people not selling to kids and these other criteria, as long as we talk about nonviolent, low level offenders, the way we can side step what is wrong in the law here is to just not list the amount of the drugs involved in the charging document. you do not trigger the mandatory minimum sentence and the sentence will happen with more discretion with an eye toward
9:10 pm
frankly reducing the number of people in prison and how long they are there for. this is not eric holder changing the law. maybe congress will get around to changing the law someday. in the meantime, this changes the way the law is enforced around the country instantly as of today. it kind of seems like this might be a big deal. joining us, bryan stevenson of the equal justice initiative and professor at nyu. thank you for being with us. nice to have you here. >> my pleasure. thank you. >> so can you explain how significant a change this is and how these changes are going to be implemented? >> oh, i think it's a very significant change. you know, when we passed mandatory minimum laws, everybody thinks that eliminated discretion. it took discretion away from judges and gave it to prosecutors. today the attorney general said he's going to exercise that discretion in a way that actually reduces the number of people being sent to prison for these long prison sentences for low-level non-violent drug
9:11 pm
crimes. i think it's a really significant step forward. it's the kind of leadership many of us have been calling for for decades. the problem of vast imprisonment in this country have largely fueled by our misguided war on drugs and the way it has sent hundreds of thousands of people to prison for these low-level drug problems which are not a threat to public safety and cost billions of dollars. i think it's a really enormous step forward for the government. >> is he breaking new ground in the way he is approaching this problem? of course this is not a change in the law. this is a change in prosecutorial discretion in terms of how he is directing the nation's federal prosecutors to go about their work. is that a new way to approach this issue? >> i think it is. i think too few people have appreciated how much discretion prosecutors have to deal with this problem in a more sort of immediate way. i mean, i think it's significant in that respect, but i also think it's significant for a leadership prospective. everybody in this country has been paralyzed by the politics
9:12 pm
of fear and anger. most people recognize that these kinds of reforms are critically necessary. but our instincts after 40 years of mass incarceration make it very hard for politicians to actually pass the laws that produce the amount of time that people spend in prison. so we've been looking for leadership, and i think what he's done today is significant leadership. i think it has the possibility of being replicated in states which is where we really need it. we have to remember that only 10% of the people incarcerated in this country are in the federal system. most of our mass imprisonment problem is in the states. and this decision won't directly effect state policy but could have an impact on how we think about mass incarceration and also drug policy. drug policy has been so misguided for so long that i'm hoping it inspires a healthier conversation about how to move forward. >> it's interesting, in the attorney general's speech explaining this move today, he talked about reforms toward lessening the prison population,
9:13 pm
toward affording prosecutorial and charging discretion in a way that might lead to shorter sentences or fewer sentences. in a lot of unexpected places. in a lot of red states. he talked about texas, for example, and other southern republican-controlled states that have made reforms to their criminal justice system. is that -- obviously that's politically important for trying to get a change like this to stick. is that a sign this is actually becoming less of a partisan combat, this is becoming something that's treated sort of more technocratically? >> i think it is. there are a lot of people on both sides of the political aisle that have been urging us to be smarter on crime. we can't keep invoking tough on crime. we have to be smart on crime. a lot of republicans and democrats have been making that call and you have seen states, texas and south carolina and states that are considered conservative implementing policies designed to turn around some of these things. we have to be honest a lot of this is driven by cost. you know, we're spending $80
9:14 pm
billion to keep people incarcerated that are not a threat to public safety. we need those dollars in other parts of our government. it's not just kind of moral evolution here. there's also a cost dynamic. i think this can become an issue that is less politicized than a lot of the issues that we've been dealing with here recently at the policy and certainly the national policy level. >> bryan, when you look at our overall relationship to other industrialized countries, other well-off countries around the world and see how disproportionately we lock up our own population, do you think there need to be a root and branch fundamental change in the way we approach crime and punishment or do you think we could sort of normalize our level of imprisonment in this country compared to the rest of the world through step-by-step changes like this? i despair of the prospect of us rethinking it in a big way, but i do feel like it is possible to make significant changes step by step like this one today. >> well, i think actually in some ways both things are really needed.
9:15 pm
i think you're right. we can -- i believe we can reduce the prison population in this country by 50% over the next 6 to 8 years if we engage in the kind of policy initiatives that the attorney general announced today. and i think we have to do that. we have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. we are decimating communities. a black boy born in 2000 has a 32% chance of going to jail or prison. that's a shocking and really disturbing reality. we've got to make some changes. but i also think we have to think more fundamentally about crime and punishment. we've been so carried away with finding ways to put as many people in prison for as long as possible that we've got to deal not only with mandatory minimum sentences but deal with three strikes laws. we have to deal with more rational sentencing, more effective sentencing. the federal government actually created the war on drugs. they are the ones that spent billions of dollars and gave it to the state to create drug task forces that have really corrupted our criminal justice priorities. some states, we're spending all
9:16 pm
of our money to get marijuana possessors in jail in prison and under-prosecuting violent crimes involving rape and murder. we've got to change that around. that's why i think both of these things are needed. we've got to do reforms, incremental reforms and also create a more just, more humane or rational system of justice that prioritizes public safety but also prioritizes human recovery and rehabilitation and healthy communities. >> bryan stevenson, founder and executive director of equal justice initiative. thank you for being here tonight. >> very happy to be with you. i will tell you in the 1990s before i was involved in media, i worked in criminal justice issues. the scale of american imprisonment was one of those things that seemed absolutely impenetrable as a political issue. something that would never get better, that would only get worse over the course of my lifetime to the point where it became the dominant thing in american politics and in american society. it just seemed like it was a mountain that could never be
9:17 pm
climbed. and it is not a mountain. turns out it's a mesa and we're coming down the other side of it and this thing is changing. nothing is inevitable in american politics. we'll be right back. about who to hire without going to angie's list first. with angie's list, i know who to call, and i know the results will be fantastic! find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. but you had to leave rightce to now, would you go? world, man: 'oh i can't go tonight' woman: 'i can't.' hero : that's what expedia asked me. host: book the flight but you have to go right now. hero: (laughs) and i just go? this is for real right? this is for real? i always said one day i'd go to china, just never thought it'd be today. anncr: we're giving away a trip every day. download the expedia app and your next trip could be on us. expedia, find yours. i don't always have time to eat like i should. that's why i like glucerna shakes.
9:18 pm
they have slowly digestible carbs to help minimize blood sugar spikes. [ male announcer ] glucerna. helping people with diabetes find balance.
9:19 pm
car insurance companies say they'll save you by switching, you'd have like, a ton of dollars.
9:20 pm
but how're they saving you those dollars? a lot of companies might answer "um" or "no comment." then there's esurance. born online, raised by technology and majors in efficiency. so whatever they save, you save. hassle, time, paperwork, hair-tearing out, and yes, especially dollars. esurance. now backed by allstate. click or call. blast of cold feels nice. why don't you use bengay zero degrees? it's the one you store in the freezer. same medicated pain reliever used by physical therapists. that's chilly! [ male announcer ] bengay zero degrees. freeze and move on. embattled governor ultrasound. bob mcdonnell of virginia, is in the middle of a two week 22 stop commonwealth of opportunity tour. i think the governor hopes the tour will give the commonwealth the opportunity to stop
9:21 pm
wondering whether he's going to resign or be indicted or both. and also which order might be best if both of those things end up happening. unfortunately, for his efforts at taking everyone's mind off of his own corruption scandal, week one of the bob mcdonnell tour coincided exactly with the "washington post" breaking the news on the governor taking another $50,000 cash from a guy who he then offered a seat on a state medical board. now week two of the commonwealth of opportunity tour starts with the first major newspaper in virginia calling for governor bob mcdonnell to resign. it is the "daily progress" newspaper in charlottesville, virginia, and their editorial calling for governor mcdonnell to resign is bralt. "mr. mcdonnell's effectiveness is at an end. worst, mr. mcdonnell has become an outright liability to the commonwealth and its citizens. he has repeatedly then blindness to the importance of the scandal.
9:22 pm
apparently because there is no true north in his ethical compass." there have been other calls, of course, for governor mcdonnell to resign before now, but before now it has mostly been democratic politicians making those noises. now, though, it is not just a major newspaper in the state of virginia, it is a major newspaper who endorsed the governor. "having endorsed mr. mcdonnell, nearly four years ago, it gives us no pleasure now to urge him to resign. in terms of what governor mcdonnell is doing in the state now, instead of resigning, well, that's when it gets really brutal. "his current schedule is heavy on public relations activities. visiting troops, endorsing adoption, showing up for an anti-crime event. these are worthy endeavors, of course, but a governor's association with good causes should be for the purpose of bringing them additional attention through the stature of his name and office. the ironic truth is that it appears that bob mcdonnell is using these associations with good causes to gain advantage for himself rather than to convey it. he needs the positive publicity
9:23 pm
more than they do." wow. that is the "daily progress" in charlottesville, virginia. honestly, nobody knows exactly what happens next in this corruption scandal. there has been one other big change from the mcdonnell side that may indicate that something is about to happen. you should at least know about it if you're interested in this story. the guy for whom governor mcdonnell and his family took the $50,000 check and $70,000 check and the $15,000 dinner and the other $10,000 check and the $15,000 shopping spree and the loan of a white ferrari and the lake house and all the rest of it, oh and the rolex watch. i'm sure i'm forgetting other stuff, too. that guy from whom they took all those gifts heads a company that for months now has been known to be under federal investigation. they had to disclose they were under federal investigation to their shareholders. on friday, that company put out a statement saying, happy day,
9:24 pm
they are not expecting to be charged in conjunction with that federal investigation. now, at the same time, there has been recent reporting in the "washington post" that the guy who heads the company who gave all the loot to bob mcdonnell and his family, the "washington post" is reporting he's returned states evidence, he's on the prosecutor's side in the investigation into governor bob mcdonnell. this is the other shoe midair dropping. okay? what's happening now is that governor bob mcdonnell's private spokesman who he hired specifically to handle his scandal is now publicly attacking the governor's pal. the guy who gave him all the money and the rolex and the ferrari and the rest of it. they're throwing that guy under the bus. "apparently the u.s. government has given star scientist a free pass in return for the testimony of johnny williams." old johnny williams, the incredibly generous gift giver, has always been defined throughout this whole scandal as governor bob's dear pal. that was part of the defense, right?
9:25 pm
i didn't have to declare all the stuff my friend gave me. he's just a friend who gives me $50,000 checks and watches and stuff. through all of this, bob mcdonnell's supposed innocence was predicated on him being such good pals with his sugar daddy that it couldn't possibly be corruption. it couldn't possibly be improper. now 180-degree turn. total u-turn. now all of a sudden, that guy, his best buddy is the one to blame. this is a total and radical change in strategy from governor ultrasound. does it mean there's about to be something newsworthy here? an indictment of some kind? an announcement related to this federal investigation of some kind? nobody knows until that happens. but he has reverse strategy 180 degrees. you know what, hey, it's only monday. the commonwealth of opportunity tour lasts all week. anything could happen. ally good. (growls)
9:26 pm
(man) that's a good look for you. (woman) that was fun. (man) yeah. (man) let me help you out with the.. (woman)...oh no, i got it. (man) you sure? (woman) just pop the trunk. (man vo) i may not know where the road will lead, but... i'm sure my subaru will get me there. (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.
9:27 pm
if you have high cholesterol, here's some information that may be worth looking into. in a clinical trial versus lipitor, crestor got more high-risk patients' bad cholesterol to a goal of under 100. getting to goal is important, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over time. and that's why when diet and exercise alone aren't enough to lower cholesterol i prescribe crestor. [ female announcer ] crestor is not right for everyone. like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired, have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. is your cholesterol at goal?
9:28 pm
ask your doctor about crestor. [ female announcer ] if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.
9:29 pm
i do not know much about golf -- i down know anything about golf. i do not golf. i don't even like being near golf. however, i like weird stories that sound like they will start badly but turn out well. this is jonas blixt. sad day during the pga championship, mr. blixts was playing well until the 18th hole. he hit his ball into a group of people. on the 18th hole, he hit the ball so badly that it nailed a spectator. it flew into the crowd and hit someone. bad news. right?
9:30 pm
actually, no. just weird news. as it turns out. the ball that jonas hit into that spectator landed in the man's pants. he hit the ball into the crowd and it popped right into the back pocket of a nice retired doctor who said it didn't hurt that badly. so the bad news, right, is shot into the crowd. but it has two happy consequences. first is the nice doctor is not hurt. seconds on a count of the badly shot ball taking a detour into the doctor's pants, that ball could not travel any further in the wrong direction. jonas, by rule, was allowed to take the next shot from the grass right where dr. hole in pants had been standing. and on that hole, he ended up getting a birdie which does not mean that he hit a bird after he hit the doctor's pants. no, he did something good that got him a nice, low score that i don't totally understand. all in all, good news. i bet that doctor will never wash those pants again. and, if that has whet your an tight for good news today, i
9:31 pm
have more ahead. on a topic that's been bad news on this show before, for months it now may be turn into a good news story. we have that good news story coming up. it will make your night. stay with us. i think farmers care more about the land than probably anyone else. we've had this farm for 30 years. we raise black and red angus cattle. we also produce natural gas. that's how we make our living and that's how we can pass the land and water back to future generations. people should make up their own mind what's best for them. all i can say is it has worked well for us.
9:32 pm
[ babies crying ] surprise -- your house was built on an ancient burial ground. [ ghosts moaning ] surprise -- your car needs a new transmission. [ coyote howls ] how about no more surprises? now you can get all the online trading tools you need without any surprise fees. ♪ it's not rocket science. it's just common sense.
9:33 pm
from td ameritrade. [ beeping ] ♪ [ male announcer ] we don't just certify our pre-owned vehicles. we inspect, analyze and recondition each one, until it's nothing short of a genuine certified pre-owned... mercedes-benz for the next new owner. ♪ hurry in to your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for 1.99% financing during our certified pre-owned sales event through september 3rd. vietnam in 1972. [ all ] fort benning, georgia in 1999. [ male announcer ] usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protection and because usaa's commitment to serve military members, veterans, and their families is without equal. begin your legacy, get an auto insurance quote. usaa. we know what it means to serve.
9:34 pm
this is balhaf liquified natural gas terminal. if gets natural gas on land pumped in by a pipeline. it shoots it out from the mainland on pipes that stretch out on a long jetty into the gulf of aden. see the jetty there? big tankers pull up alongside the jetty, fill up with natural gas then get on their way to ship it around the world. you may remember that in the year 2000, the "u.s.s. cole" was bombed when refueling at a port in yemen. that was the port in aden in yemen which you see on the bottom part of your screen. this port at balhaf, same country, same bit of coastline. balhaf is 250 miles up the way to the east. on june 2nd, somebody tried to blow up the belhaf liquified natural gas terminal. thankfully it blew up too early and only the driver, only the suicide bomber was killed. then last wednesday, yemen said
9:35 pm
it had foiled another plot to attack oil and gas facilities in that same area and also further up the coastline in a place called mukala, that was on wednesday. they said plots had been foiled. now an attack seems to have been successful. five soldiers reported killed yesterday in yemen near that balhaf terminal, after multiple attackers reportedly surprised the yemeni soldiers at their guard posts. now, the people who run the balhaf liquified natural gas terminal are insisting emphatically the terminal, itself, did not get hurt saying it hurts their shareholders to imply that the terminal, itself, came under attack. they want everybody to know that it actually was up the road a ways. it was between them and the other nearest oil and gas facility on that same chunk of yemen's coast. so it was almost them in june, but for the faulty suicide bomber, they were saved from it being them last week and now it
9:36 pm
was immediately down the road there this weekend. they want their shareholders to know that everything is safe. when the u.s. announced it was closing 19 embassies a little more than a week ago, yemen was one of the 19. yemen took the additional step of evacuating basically all american personnel out of that country on military transport aircraft. well, this weekend, 18 of the 1 9 embassies were opened back up, but not yemen. yemen is staying closed because of, quote, ongoing concerns about a threat stream indicating the potential for terrorist attacks. also, meanwhile, there have been at least nine u.s. drone strikes in yemen over the last two weeks. nine. the only thing we know about them is that they have not hit any, quote, household names. nine strikes? what in the world is going on in yemen right now? and why is this all happening right now? joining us now from cairo, richard engel, nbc news chief foreign correspondent. thank you for joining us.
9:37 pm
it's good to have you here. >> reporter: it's always a pleasure to be with you, rachel, and i love talking about yemen. it's one of the most interesting, fascinating, beautiful and unfortunately troubled countries in this region. that says a lot. this is a troubled region. >> you have always described to me, yemen, as one of the most beautiful places on earth and i know how much you love it as a country and love the capital city of yemen. what do you understand about the level of threat there? and is it that much more acute than it has been at other troubled times in recent history? >> reporter: not really. i think the way to understand it is you have to think of yemen a little bit like somalia. it is a country that is at war. it is a country that is fighting a civil war. that part of the coastline you just mentioned not far from aden, the southern area, was actually controlled by al qaeda two to three years ago. and they ran it like they ran a little state in afghanistan or
9:38 pm
somalia. they were the authority there. and that is obviously a very bad thing. and there was a small war that didn't get a lot of attention, that was launched by the yemeni government. the saudi arabia, most of it air forces, and backed up with u.s. advisers and drones. this was about 2, 2 1/2 years ago. and it was a very bloody campaign. and thousands of yemeni troops were involved and they drove al qaeda mostly out of this area. i went with yemeni troops when they were trying to show people they had taken the territory back. i was astonished at the amount of damage. buildings chewed up, whole towns that looked like they'd been destroyed. people killed in this fighting. al qaeda had been doing crucifixions in the area. it was a little state run by al qaeda. those militants who were there
9:39 pm
weren't entirely defeated. they did what was described by many as a tactical withdrawal and they left for other parts of the country. they went to jobe, they went to other parts of the rural areas. and they have established their own safe havens there. and that is what we're seeing mostly being attacked right now by the drone strikes. these groups are still around. they are reconstituting their forces. and they're quite aggressive. and i wouldn't put it past them to try and carry out attacks. carry out attacks against oil facilities, carry out attacks against embassies, carry out attack against a lot of different facilities. >> richard, one of the things that we are hearing in washington is part of the decision about where to pull back, where to extract u.s. personnel and close down facilities, is not just about the threat level, but it's about whether or not those people and those facilities can be defended and the places where we feel like we can't physically can't defend things in case of attack are more likely to be shut down than places where we have better
9:40 pm
physical and security planning. is that part of what's going on in yemen? that it is just an isolated, difficult place to defend if things do go wrong? >> yeah. this is the benghazi effect. you know, anything that's considered a remote outpost that is hard to protect gets shut down first. yemen, like in all of these countries, we're mostly dependent on local forces, and the yemeni government doesn't have a tremendous capacity. it doesn't have a lot of air lift. it doesn't have a lot of troops who can be called in to move from place to place. al qaeda in the arabian peninsula is not a big group. al qaeda in yemen as it's also known. it's very well armed. it's dug in. it knows how to fight in its terrain. it's chosen the places where it wants to fight and it's effective at launching hit-and-run attacks. why, whether the u.s. has been overreacting by closing so many
9:41 pm
facilities around the world, now they're re-opened except the one in yemen, there's been a lot of debate about that. but i think it's fair to say that the threat in yemen is particularly, is particularly high right now. and you have to also understand, these drone attacks, which al qaeda sees as a part of an ongoing war against it that's going back two, three years, are a bit of a source of pride for al qaeda there. al qaeda in the arabian peninsula, its leader came out overnight and saying, we're still here. there's been a lot of drone attacks and we plan to liberate prisons and give a very bold statement. and because of that, yemen has now actually put extra security on its prison facilities. so the story at least in yemen is not over yet. >> it's not over yet and feels like each additional, each new thing that we learn just makes clear how little we understand about the overall picture. at least about what's going to happen next. richard engel, nbc news chief foreign correspondent.
9:42 pm
thank you for staying us into the middle of the night to be with us. i appreciate it, man. >> my pleasure. in the history of this show, only once have i been moved to bang my head on the desk in response to something said to me by a guest. only once in five years. and the guest who so moved me to bang my head on this desk has just now made some serious news. which might make you bang your head on the desk, too. that story is coming up. to ea. and the more i focus on everything else, the less time i have to take care of me. that's why i like glucerna shakes. they have slowly digestible carbs to help minimize blood sugar spikes. glucerna products help me keep everything balanced. [ golf clubs clanking ] [ husband ] i'm good! well, almost everything. [ male announcer ] glucerna. delicious shakes and bars. helping people with diabetes find balance.
9:43 pm
[ male announcer ] glucerna. delicious shakes and bars. i'm bethand i'm michelle. and we own the paper cottage. it's a stationery and gifts store.
9:44 pm
anything we purchase for the paper cottage goes on our ink card. so you can manage your business expenses and access them online instantly with the game changing app from ink. we didn't get into business to spend time managing receipts, that's why we have ink. we like being in business because we like being creative, we like interacting with people. so you have time to focus on the things you love. ink from chase. so you can. to prove to you that aleve is the better choice for him, he's agreed to give it up. that's today? [ male announcer ] we'll be with him all day as he goes back to taking tylenol. i was okay, but after lunch my knee started to hurt again. and now i've got to take more pills. ♪ yup. another pill stop. can i get my aleve back yet? ♪ for my pain, i want my aleve.
9:45 pm
♪ [ male announcer ] look for the easy-open red arthritis cap.
9:46 pm
this is a good news story but it starts in kind of a weird news place. the good news i'll get to in a second. the weird news to start is that the american civil war is not over. literally. in the sense that we are still paying for it. president obama explained as much this weekend. >> think about it. we lost the last veteran of the first world war two years ago. but we still care for the children of our world war i veterans. to this day, we still help care for children of men who fought in the spanish american war. even the daughter of a civil war veteran. so when we -- [ applause ] so when we talk about fulfilling our promises to all who serve, we're not just talking about a
9:47 pm
few years. we're talking about decades. for as long as you and your families walk this earth. >> for as long as you and your families walk this earth. president obama speaking with veterans this weekend. a daughter of a u.s. civil war veteran is still, today, receiving veterans benefits that her dad earned by serving in the civil war. wow. for this president, who has ended one of the wars he inherited and who says he will end the other, the longest war in our history next year, for president obama, the issue of making good on our promises to veterans has been a huge deal for his administration and frankly has also been a huge problem that has not only been bad for most of this administration, it has been getting worse for a very long time. by the v.a.'s own count, the wait time for veterans applying for disability benefits has been getting worse. the wait time has been getting longer, year by year. in 2009, the average wait time, 161 days. the next year, 165 days. the next year, 188 days.
9:48 pm
last year, 262 days. that's the wait time to even hear back, even if the answer is no. veterans waiting way too long to get the benefits that we promised to them and that they earned. increased wait times in this unacceptable ginormous backlog have always been coupled with repeated assurances from the v.a., itself, that it's going to get better. that they have a plan. that they are going to someday turn the tide. it has been getting so long and been getting worse for so long that it has been hard not to feel cynical about those assurances. now, though, some overdue but much better news delivered by the commander in chief, himself. watch. >> today i can report that we are not where we need to be, but we're making progress. we are making progress. so after years when the backlog kept growing, finally the
9:49 pm
backlog is shrinking. in the last five months alone, it's down nearly 20%. we're turning the tide. >> the backlog is still way too big, but the backlog, at least, is going the right direction. at the very least, president obama is on the record claiming good news. this has been a bad news and getting worse news story forever, it feels like, but after years of just saying it would get better, now the commander in chief says it is getting better. it has started. i mean, the great assault here, right, the champagne should probably remain on ice, leave the noise makers and party hats in storage, but let there be cautious optimism. if they really are turning this thing around, it will be cause for real celebration and we have complained on this show about this backlog problem so angrily for so many months and years now, if they really are turning it around, the real celebration will in part be healthier. watch this space.
9:50 pm
[ school bell rings ] ♪ school's out for summer ♪ [ male announcer ] from the last day of school, back to the first. they're gonna need a lot of stuff. for everything kids need to everything they want in styles and colors as unique as they are. staples has it. stock up for the year now and get 15% off school supplies through september 21st when you buy a back to school savings pass. staples. that was easy.
9:51 pm
when you buy a back to school savings pass. "stubborn love" by the lumineers did you i did. email? so what did you think of the house? did you see the school ratings? oh, you're right. hey babe, i got to go. bye daddy! have a good day at school, ok? ...but what about when my parents visit? ok. i just love this one... and it's next to a park. i love it. i love it too. here's our new house... daddy! you're not just looking for a house.
9:52 pm
you're looking for a place for your life to happen. and didn't know where to start. a contractor before at angie's list, you'll find reviews on everything from home repair to healthcare written by people just like you. no company can pay to be on angie's list, so you can trust what you're reading. angie's list is like having thousands of close neighbors, where i can go ask for personal recommendations. that's the idea. before you have any work done, check angie's list. find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. i love you, angie. sorry, honey. the ones getting involved and staying engaged. they're not afraid to question the path they're on. because the one question they never want to ask is "how did i end up here?" i started schwab for those people. people who want to take ownership of their investments,
9:53 pm
like they do in every other aspect of their lives. there's an important election tomorrow, one of new jersey's u.s. senate seats has been vacant since senator frank lautenberg died in june. new jersey's governor could have appointed somebody to serve out the rest of the senator's term, but he didn't. he appointed someone temporarily and called a special election. the primary for that election is tomorrow. all the attention so far has been on the democratic side, where newark mayor cory booker is out ahead of a strong democratic field. on the democratic side it's a contest between four qualified candidates, two well-regarded members of congress, the speaker of the state assembly, and the mayor of the state's largest city, mr. booker, who is way out ahead. he leads by something like 35% in the polls. his stature, his perceived promise in national politics is just overwhelming the people he's competing against. but it is quality competition on the democratic side. a strong field. on the republican side it's different.
9:54 pm
the current republican front-runner is steve lonegan, the ex-mayor of bogota, new jersey. the latest news from his campaign is having to take down this tweet identifying what they say are the most africa-like parts of newark. because -- geez, man. come on. the campaign took it down and then did the honorable thing. they found a young staffer to blame it on. for whatever reason, maybe because it is august, the just under the surface cross-current of crazy in our national republican party seems to be surfacing everywhere right now. for example, it just took over the whole republican party in the otherwise fairly reasonable state of oregon. on the surface this is just a story about turnover in the top ranks of the oregon republican party. they elected a new chair in february. five months later there were petitions to have her turfed out and then she was going to be recalled. then just before she was going to be recalled at a party meeting this weekend she resigned. so on short notice they picked this guy, this guy who had run twice for congress as a
9:55 pm
republican. but this is not just any guy who has run twice for congress as a republican and lost. this is art robinson. this is the art robinson. this is public schools are a form of socialist child abuse art robinson. this is nuclear waste should be used as insulation in your home art robinson. or as we like to think of him around here, our own art robinson. >> you have advocated that radioactive waste should be dissolved in water and "widely dispersed in the oceans." >> the statements that you have just made are untrue. >> wait. i was quoting you. >> what you've done is take tiny excerpts from a vast amount of writing i've done on this scientific subject. >> did you write this? i'm quoting from your newsletter. there's no ellipses here. "all we need to do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the ocean or even over america." >> i wrote thousands and thousands of words on the subject.
9:56 pm
you have picked a few words and twisted them into an untruth. >> can i ask you about something else you've written in your newsletter and you can tell me -- >> you can say anything you want. you're running the camera. >> you posited in print in your own publications. there was no editor. it wasn't taken out of context. >> here we go again. >> that aids was a government conspiracy. that it wasn't real. that the government -- >> i absolutely deny that. i never, ever in my life made a statement like that. you are lying. i never made statement like that and i know it. you are lying. the statement you just made is an outright lie. >> quoting from mr. robinson's newsletter. "only" -- >> no way. you are lying. >> look. it's on the screen. yay. >> i have never in my life -- >> "only government reclassification of more and more disease types as aids cases has kept the numbers of victims at politically necessary levels." you wrote it. i'm quoting it. do you no longer believe it?
9:57 pm
>> no. you -- madam, i'm not going to discuss -- what happened to hormesis? we were in that. >> the new chairman of the oregon republican party, america. every party has its kooks, though. right? and maybe the new jersey senate primary election and the oregon republican party chairmanship seem far flung. but even if you'd look at the most mainstream network tv center of the universe republican politics right now, even there, whoop, there it is. >> we've resonated with a lot of people. >> but you don't still question that he was born in the united states, do you? >> i have no idea. >> even at this point? >> well, i don't know. was there a birth certificate? you tell me. some people say that was not his birth certificate. i'm saying i don't know. nobody knows. >> happy sunday morning. congratulations, abc. yes, you did that. over on "meet the press" there was republican congressman steve king, debating latino republican strategist ana navarro and questioning whether she understands english.
9:58 pm
>> i've seen the drug smugglers. i've spent time on the border. i've ridden with the border patrol. i sat on the fence at night. i sat in a ranch house and the border patrol come to me in civilian clothes and they tell me narrative after narrative -- >> frankly i think he's being helpful to the immigration debate because it is emboldening other republicans to speak out strongly against him, people like john boehner, like eric cantor, like paul ryan. we're not going to stand anymore for the republican party being defined by somebody like steve king. >> well, i would say this. first of all, i spoke only of drug smugglers. and if ana understands the language, she should know that. >> if ana understands the language. also make the sunday talk show circuit this weekend was texas congressman louie gohmert who is mostly known for his immigration insights like this one. >> we know al qaeda has camps over with the drug cartels on the other side of the mexican border. we know that people are now being trained to come in and act like hispanic when they're radical islamists. we know these things are happening.
9:59 pm
>> the radical islamists being trained to come in and act like the hispanic. so it might be comforting to think that these are just the donald trumps and steve kings and louie gohmerts of the world that no serious person with power and standing in politics would make these arguments. sadly, no. because you're hearing the same arguments in some cases from guys like the chairman of the house armed services committee, republican congressman buck mckeon. >> i think you probably would agree with me. there are people that think that they can't tell the difference between a hispanic person and an arab person. and if you get an arab that's trained, that's coming into this country to be a terrorism, a terrorist, they can mingle in and they can get in here and, you know, then they can do damage. >> they can mingle in? what exactly is the argument here?
10:00 pm
latinos crossing the border, won't be able to tell if there's an arab secretly trying to cross the border with them because they all look alike and they might accidentally help bring an arab over here mingled in? is that the argument? seriously? today a federal judge and the attorney general take bold steps toward justice. >> the halls of justice are buzzing today with two major pieces of news. >> new york city's controversial stop and frisk program. >> a judge finds that the stop and frisk policy is unconstitutional. >> also today, attorney general eric holder -- >> attornege


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on