tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC November 1, 2013 1:00am-2:01am PDT
>> it's great to have you on at prime-time. >> thanks to you at home for joining me this hour. happy halloween. as you can see, same costume as last year. middle-aged lesbian pundit in a jacket bought for less than $20 at a mall. trick or treat. this is chris mcdaniel, he is a mississippi state senator of the tea party persuasion. he wants to mount a tea party hard right-wing primary challenge against mississippi's long-serving republican u.s. senator, thad cochran. and chris mcdaniel was the source of a little bit of political embarrassment earlier this month when the news magazine, mother jones, wrote about his history with neoconfederate groups in his state. mr. mcdaniel has been keynoting events hosted by this group, which is a local chapter of the sons of confederate veterans. one of the events that chris
mcdaniel did for them featured all of the attendees dressing up in confederate uniforms. and these are not just guys who celebrate the history of the confederacy. these are guys who think there ought to be a confederacy now. they fly the confederate flag and wear confederate battle uniforms. not just because they like that the south seceded once, but because they want the south to secede again, and for pretty much the same reasons that they did the first time. this was a political embarrassment when the neoconfederate, neosecessionist leanings of this guy were reported nationally, but it should be noted that it was not an embarrassment for him. he is not denying that this is who he is, he is not denying that these are the groups that he associates with, with and that he speaks at their events and this is his politics. that was not an embarrassment. the reason it was an embarrassment because this guy had just been endorsed by a bunch of big-time senate conservative funds, like the club for growth. it's one time to wax anarchististic from your nice
k-street office in washington. it's one thing to do that in theory. it's another thing to actually try to bring the guy with the confederate flag into the united states senate. so that was embarrassing. and it raised this interesting question of whether being a secessionist, whether being a neo confederate, raised the question of whether that is a problem in mainstream conservative politics in 2013. i mean, state senator chris mcdaniel may not be embarrassed about pictures like this in mississippi, but for the national republican party and the big washington conservative groups, bringing a guy like this not u.s. senate, that really going to be okay with you guys? so they endorsed him. all these conservative groups endorsed him. and then it was after they endorsed him that all the confederate stuff came out about him. what next? not only did none of the conservative groups rescind their endorsements once they
learned the confederate stuff about him, but now since the reporting on this guy's confederate leanings have come out, since then, he's just gotten another big washington endorsement. freedomworks waited until after the pictures of the guy with the confederate flag and speaking to the secessionist groups, waited until after that before they endorsed chris mcdaniel against the incumbent republican senator from mississippi. and they didn't just do so with a press release, day did so at an event in jackson, mississippi. freedomworks sent their vice president from washington down to mississippi to make the endorsement in person. you can see him in this vote with the red arrow pointing to him, making the pitch for senator chris mcdaniel. there's senator mcdaniel, basking in it. besides him, you might notice the confederate flag there. i should say, for the sake of clarity, that that is not really the confederate flag proper, that's the mississippi state flag, which includes part of the confederate flag in its iconography, so that's also a source of confusion. but that question that had been
an open question for the past week or so, about whether or not it's okay now to support southern secession and be a neoconfederate in today's republican party, with the freedomworks endorsement, it's clear that that's been answered. and the answer to that question is, yeah, it's okay. it's no problem. it's no impediment whatsoever to your upward assent in republican politics, wrap yourself in the confederate battle flag. they're fine with it. so now it seems clear that conservative republican senator, thad cochran, after 35 years in the senate, he will have a primary challenger. and yeah, sure, the guy's got this confederate thing going on, but it is only republican primary voters in mississippi who are going to be making a decision in this contest. and the confederate guy, we know, has deep-pocketed support on the right from the biggest names in the national conservative movement. if you step back from stories like this for just a minute, it is kind of an amazing phenomenon. i mean, this is not war between the parties, this is not
liberals versus conservatives. this is all the power and the money and the energy that the right can muster, being directed at incumbent republicans to throw republicans out of office. i mean, no democratic candidate in mississippi was going to turf thad cochran out of office next year. look at the margins by which he has won his last few elections. 69%, 29% in a bad year. this is what you call a safe seat as long as thad cochran is sitting in it. but he might not be in that seat anymore. and that situation for an incumbent republican senator is not just in mississippi. it's also in georgia, with johnny isaacson, jeff flake, north carolina with richard burr. and it's true for the top republican in the senate, mitch mcconnell in kentucky. these guys are all facing primary challengers. they are all now facing negative adds that are running right now in their home states. negative ads, primary
challengers, and all the rest, from what is supposed to be their own side. the senate conservatives fund, the tea party group, that's trying to throw mitch mcconnell out of his senate seat, they are already, already in 2013, doing big, six-figure ad buys against mitch mcconnell in his home state. >> when kentucky needed mitch mcconnell the most, he let us down. now he's asking us to give us six more years in washington. senate conservative action is responsible for the content of this message. >> that is not the first, but it's the most recent ad against mitch mcconnell, run by a conservative group against him in his home state. that buy was made two days ago. it was made from more than $300,000 to be spent in kentucky. so where are they getting all the money to attack all these incumbent republican senators and run all these super professional-looking big buy attack ads? where are they getting the money? they are getting the money from ted cruz.
>> the constitution gives congress the power of the purse. and we need congress to stand up and de-fund obama care now. please join me so we can get america back on track. >> please call 1-800-314-8505 and tell congress to defund obama care now. that's 1-800-314-8505. 1-800-314-8505. senate conservatives fund is responsible for this message. >> senator ted cruz has been a relentless fund-raiser for this group, that is primarying all of his coworkers in the republican caucus in the senate. >> you know, there's a national website, don'tfundit.com. it's got as of a few minutes ago, 578,000 signatures on it. every time in the past few weeks i've got on fox news, we've seen another 10, 20,000 signatures.
>> you know, if you were moved by that ted cruz prime-time appearance on fox news, if you were moved to add your name to that petition, you would find when you went to don'tfundit.com, you would find when you went there, a giant "donate" button, and if you were inspired by ted cruz to click that button and make that donation, your donation would go to the senate conservatives fund, so they could do stuff like running attack ads against mitch mcconnell in kentucky, fueled by ted cruz's relentless, it slices, it dices, it juliennes fund-raising pitches, the senate conservatives fund reported in september that they had their best fund-raising month all year. they raised more than $2 million just in the month, and that buys a lot of really unflattering photoshopping of mitch mcconnell's jawline, and a lot of ominous music that makes you think of bad things when you see mitch mcconnell's poorly lit face. if you are one of these conservative republican senators, you are going to work every day now alongside a guy who just last month raised more
than $2 million to get you fired. and not in theoretical, future terms. those ads are already running against these guys in their home states. and it wasn't just a whim or a flash of anger that caused ted cruz to do this. it wasn't just a thing that he did in the middle of the shutdown because he was moved by the drama. no, ted cruz has been raising money for the groups that are primarying his colleagues in the senate for months now. this summer, he did a traveling road show to raise money for the senate conservatives fund to fire his colleagues, which is probably awkward at work with those colleagues every day. so now senator ted cruz has offered a, quote, olive branch to his colleagues, as reported by, you guessed it, politico.com, ted cruz is telling the other republican senators now that he will no longer raise money for their opponents to try to end their political careers. after the meeting, it should be noted his spokesperson softened the pledge a little bit, saying, it's likely that the senator
will not continue to do that sort of thing. probably. but, still, now, if you go to the senate conservatives youtube page to check out what it is they have to offer, what they have to offer is ted cruz. ted cruz talking about how we've got to burn down washington and clear out the underbrush and get rid of all these old guys you can't trust. have more guys like ted cruz. get rid of all these old republicans. mwah-haha. so olive branch, from that guy? yeah right. when conservatives have focused their wrath on incumbent republicans or republicans who were likely to be able to win a seat or hold on to a seat for the republican party, broadly speaking, when conservatives have trained their fire on republicans who would otherwise win, it hasn't worked out all that well. republicans would have had a senate seat in delaware with mike castle in all likelihood had they not instead picked "i am not a witch" christine o'donnell in the primary. sue lowden in nevada, for all of her troubles, she would have had
a pretty good shot at unseating harry reid in that great republican year of 2010, when republicans won anything. instead, that year, nevada republicans picked this lady, sharron angle, known for running away from reporters, threatening an armed revolution if she didn't get her way, and my favorite, telling a group of hispanic high school students in her home state that they didn't actually look hispanic to her. to her, they looked more asian. the republicans could have won in colorado had they not picked crazy ken buck. the republicans could have won in missouri, had they not picked the "legitimate rape" guy, todd akin. republicans thought for sure they'd get claire mccaskill's seat, but then todd akin. republicans could have won in indiana, had they not picked the guy who said, god sometimes wants you to get pregnant from your rapist. so the republicans, you know, they turfed out the republican incumbent or they defeated the kind of reasonable known quantity republican who might have a chance to win. and instead they picked the pure guy.
and in case after case after case, they thereby lost the seat. that is how this pattern generally works. but the pattern doesn't always work that way. there are a few exceptions. there are a few cases where turfing out the normal guy in favor of the hair-on-fire guy didn't result in a republican loss, it resulted in the hair-on-fire guy going to washington. that is how we got to ted cruz. ted cruz was the hair-on-fire guy. he was the tea party primary challenger to a guy whose hair was slightly less on fire. but it was texas, so even after picking the truly whacky guy in the primary, the republicans were still able to win the general election in texas, so now we all have ted cruz to zeal with in washington. the same pattern held in two other places in the last election, kentucky in and utah. in kentucky -- the last couple of elections. in kentucky, mitch mcconnell and the republican establishment had picked their candidate, who they wanted to run for that seat, who they knew who could win that seat.
the guy on the left. that guy on the left lost to rand paul in the primary and then rand paul won the seat. in utah, they ousted the incumbent republican senator, bob bennett, and replaced him with mike lee. because it's utah and utah is that red a state, that was enough to get somebody as out there as mike lee into the united states senate. usually the purification process works in a way that makes republicans lose. but in a few out-there places, it gets you guys like this in the senate. and it is therefore no coincidence that the three republican senators who have been supporting these senate conservatives fund, and other efforts to primary and threaten republican senators, to get their own colleagues thrown out of office, it's no coincidence that it's these guys. these guys who are the exception to the rule. these guys are the guys for whom that totally destructive purification process actually worked. most people, it doesn't work. but for them, it worked. they are the rare exceptions. so now here's the question.
these seven republicans, who are under attack right now from their own side, ted cruz raising money against them and the negative ads and all the rest, are their races likely to be christine o'donnell races? or are they likely to be ted cruz races? if this effort that ted cruz is leading succeeds in turfing out these incumbent republican senators, and that's what they're trying to do, will the neoconfederate activists and the other hair-on-fire tea party types who replace them on the republican line just go down in the general election? or will those guys actually end up in the united states senate? joining us now is sam youngman, he's a political reporter for the lexington herald leader in kentucky. mr. youngman, thanks very much for being here. nice to have you here. >> rachel, thanks very much for having me. >> so senator cruz according to politico is backing away from the senate conservatives fund, telling his colleagues in the senate that he will stop trying to get them fired. do you have any perspective on whether or not mitch mcconnell is playing any role in this?
he may be the most threatened incumbent of all out of that whole list. >> no, there's no question about it. and it's hard not to see mitch mcconnell's fingerprints on this change from senator cruz. i know that you mentioned the civil war at the top of your show. well, the civil war in the republican party is coming here to kentucky. we just can't seem to avoid being in the middle of these things. i know that senator mcconnell, after it have shutdown was over, reached out to the rest of the senate republican conference, one by one, as long as their last names weren't lee or cruz, and went through and steeled them, sort of, for the battle ahead. mitch mcconnell has decided he wants matt bevin, his primary challenger, to serve as sort of a proxy opponent, as he goes to war with these groups like the senate conservative fund, like heritage action, and it looks like they'll try to settle this blood fuel between senator mcconnell and jim demint right here in kentucky. >> the mcconnell poll numbers, right now whether he's polling versus bevin, his primary challenger, or polling versus
his democratic challenger aren't great. and he has the highest profile you can possibly have in the senate. and i'm wondering why he thinks pushing hard is going to be pushing effectively. what's the battle plan? >> well, that was my first question as well, when mitch mcconnell unleashed this really withering attack last week on matt bevin, my first response was, wow, this will backfire. he will make matt bevin if bevin can't make himself a candidate. i think that while it looks like senator mcconnell is operating from a position of weakness, and i agree, those poll numbers are anemic at best, but he's sort of feels like he's got the moxie, he's got the blood and guts to really sort of take on the matt bevins of the world, the senate conservative fund. and he's the one, he thinks of himself as a knife fighter. and he thinks that he's the one who can give them the fight that they've been spoiling for. >> that sounds crazy, i have to say it. i realize that mitch mcconnell is trying to sort of make
himself over into a scrappy guy, but mitch mcconnell is mr. magru, in terms of how he's conducted himself as the highest profile guy in the senate. the idea that he's a scrapping knife fighting guy, he may be canny, but i don't think anyone is going to identify with him in a kind of populist way. >> he might be mr. mugu in washington, but he's mr. majestic here in kentucky. the opponents that have gone up against him in the past, they -- he buries them and then he comes back to make sure he stays buried. he plays tough, plays for keep, and he's been doing that his whole career. he's a guy who wins inside the margins and that's where he likes to play. >> i've got to ask you, sam, this week we uncovered some reporting that senator rand paul has been giving speeches that are ripped off from wikipedia.
your paper editorialized on the issue today in a sort of withering way, got a comment from a senior adviser to senator paul this afternoon, dismissing the whole thing. do you get the sense that rather this is troubling the rand paul camp, or whether this is a big deal for him as he tries to take his act national? >> i think it's an issue as he looks to broaden his base. now, it's probably not a surprise to you, rachel, and i hope i don't offend you if it is, but most of rand paul's base isn't watching your show tonight. and if they are, then criticism from you might just help him out. but rand paul's base isn't the issue here. he's looking to expand that base and move beyond that fringe, beyond that margin candidate, really like his father was for so many years, and using things like the 13-hour filibuster against drones, to do so. now, this does help him -- this does hurt him significantly, i think, as he tries to broaden his support base. but i think as far as right now goes, i think that there's some room for him to try to walk this back and maybe make you a halloween -- make you a
halloween costume in the process. >> well, we'll see. you know, he did actually announce his senate candidacy on this show at one point back in the very distant future, to the extent that he can make this a story about the person who reported it, rather than the fact that he's been ripping his speeches off wikipedia, like a sophomore, will, i think, be the future of this story. sam youngman, political reporter for the "lexington herald leader," thanks for your time tonight. nice to have you here. and no offense intended to sophomores. for the moment, the mayor of one of the largest and most important cities on this continent is this man. >> what can you tell us -- >> can you get off my driveway, please? can you get off my property, please? can you get off my driveway, please?! please, can you get off my driveway?! >> that was mayor rob ford. can you get off my driveway?! he is the big-city mayor who maybe once was caught on video smoking crack.
we have the rob ford coming up in just a moment, but we actually have breaking news right now at this hour out of texas. a federal appeal court has just issued an emergency ruling on texas's draconian new abortion law. the anti-abortion law attracted national attention this summer, not just for its severity, but also because of texas democratic senator wendy davis and her 13-hour-long filibuster, which temporarily thwarted
republicans' plans to pass that law. despite that filibuster and despite large protests, texas republicans did get the law passed, and governor rick perry's signature on it set in motion a countdown to texas clinics that provide abortions having to shut down. the law had been set to go into effect on tuesday of this week, so a few days ago. and a dozen clinics in the state expected to have to close their doors that day. on monday, at the eleventh hour, a federal judge stepped in and blocked the implementation of the law, saying it was unconstitutional, so the clinic stayed open. but tonight, a higher federal court, the appeals court for the conservative fifth circuit has overturned the monday ruling, which clears the way for the law to go into effect, basically, right now. this ruling, late tonight, means that a third of the facilities that provide abortions for women in the state of texas are now getting shut down by the state government, essentially as we speak.
joining us now is amy hagstrom miller, the owner of whole womens health and currently operates five clinics in texas. thank you for being with us tonight. i appreciate it on short notice. >> you're welcome, rachel. >> how does this ruling affect the five facilities that you operate? what happens now? >> well, we have three of our facilities where we don't have admitting privileges for any of our physicians, so just this evening, we had to start calling all of our patients and cancel their appointments for tomorrow. in mckown and the rioground valley, there won't be any clinics to provide services, and in ft. worth as well, and we've also had to cancel our patients in san antonio. >> how are your patients reacting and how is your staff dealing with the logistics of this? how are people feeling about how are people feeling about this? >> you know, people are really devastated. the patients are really scared and freaked out. they're asking, where can i go, what can i do? the staff are literally sobbing, they're crying. you know, it's something that's been in the back of our minds that we thought could possibly
happen. yet at the same point, it's so obviously putting an undue burden on thousands of women, especially it's disproportionately affecting women of color and women in the rural areas in texas. and the 12 or 13 clinics that don't have admitting privileges are really spread out all across the state and none out of us are going to be able to see patients. >> when you described mcallen, for example, as one of the place with your facility closing, that means there'll be no facility in the area that provides abortion services or the related services, can you describe what mcallen is like, what kind of population you'd serve at a clinic like that and what's going to happen to those women? >> yeah, we serve a population -- it's a border community, so there's a lot of people both from mexico and from the rio grande valley. the majority of our patients don't have health insurance, they don't have medicaid. most of the women we serve there are mothers, they're working mothers. and they can't travel 300 or 400 miles up to san antonio and get their, you know, get off of work and get child care covered or whatever. so when people say, oh, they'll
be able to just go to san antonio, well, the procedure itself is going to take a few days and most of these women are needing to have an abortion because they can't make the ends meet with their family already. so there's not going to be any clinics in the rio grande valley, both whole womens health of mckown and the other facility in the valley, none of us have admitting privileges for our physicians. >> are you hearing anything about any sort of response to this ruling tonight, an appeal or any other legal strategy moving forward? >> i'm quite sure that we're going to see the go to supreme court. >> amy hagstrom miller, the owner of whole women's health clinics in the state of texas, i know this was probably a shock both in terms of its timing and in terms of its immediate implications. please keep us updated on what happens. >> absolutely. >> thanks, amy. >> thank you, rachel. >> wow. just to be clear, tonight's ruling from the fifth circuit, it's from a panel of judges in the fifth circuit. it's not from the entire fifth circuit, so that's part of the appeal. you can appeal to the full court
or up to the supreme court. but this does mean that a third of the clinics that provide abortion services in texas are closing down right now, tonight. because of that. all right. much, much more coming up. a clearly not-pleased secretary of defense makes big news tonight. a crack-smoking mayor. and the most animated i have had ever seen me in my whole life. that's all ahead. stay tuned. [ male aounc ] eligib f medice? that's a good thing, but it doesn't cover everything. only about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. so consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, they pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. call today to request a free decision guide to help you better understand what medicare is all about and which aarp medicare supplement plan works best for you. with these types of plans,
you'll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients... plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. there's a range of plans to choose from, too, and they all travel with you anywhere in the country. join the millions who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp... an organization serving the needs of people 50 and over for generations... and provided by unitedhealthcare insurance company, which has over 30 years of experience behind it. ♪ call today. remember, medicare supplement insurance helps cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. expenses that could really add up. these kinds of plans could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. you'll be able to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. and there are virtually no referrals needed. so don't wait. with all the good years ahead,
we are friends, but for all the years that i felt like i knew him, there was just no way to meet. until now. and because tv is magic, it turned out that when we finally did meet, he knew me too. >> hello, kent. >> well, well, well. rachel maddow. >> i meant kent brockman, the news anchor from "the simpsons." and in fact, it turns out that he and i have known each other for years. the rest of that sneak peek of what is actually going to be a "simpsons" episode this week, hah! is coming up. please stay with us. please. [ female announcer ] did you know the average person smiles more than 50 times a day? so brighten your smile a healthy way
you may be muddling through allergies. try zyrtec-d®. powerful relief of nasal congestion and other allergy symptoms -- all in one pill. zyrtec-d®. at the pharmacy counter. let us rise to the call of freedom loving blood that is in us and send our answer to the tyranny, in the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, i draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny and i say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever.
>> that was alabama governor george wallace being inaugurated in 1963, the height of the civil rights movement, right? by 1965, governor wallace was facing the crisis in his state of the selma-to-montgomery march. that was the march where john lewis was beaten nearly to death, beaten along with hundreds of other protesters. dozens of people were hospitalized in that march for vote rights. the beatings were televised nationally. alabama had been through a lot, but the wait that local police and state troopers beat those men and women and children on that bridge in march 1965 galvanized the nation. and the marchers themselves were adamant that they would complete their march, no matter what the alabama police did to them. so there was this question of how their safety could be guaranteed. the alabama governor, obviously, could not be counted on to keep those marchers safe. after all, it wasn't just the local police doing those beatings, it was state troopers who were out there cracking skulls in the first place. john lewis talks about looking up at the man who was beating him and the last thing he says he saw before he lost
consciousness was the confederate flag emblem of the alabama state flag on that trooper's helmet as the trooper was swinging the billy club down on him and fracturing his skull. so if that's what state authorities were dishing out to the marchers, and those marchers were going to keep marching, then who was going to keep them safe? president lyndon johnson brought alabama governor george wallace to washington to meet with him about it. they met for three hours talking about how this situation could be resolved. we now have the white house tapes from that era. so we have the recording of president johnson even after that three-hour meeting, getting on the phone with george wallace and telling him that if local police were going to be beating people and the state police were going to be beating people, then governor wallace ought to call up the national guard in his state to let the guardsmen protect the marchers. >> you call up your own guard into the service of the state and i would ask our best people
to cooperate. >> but, of course, governor "segregation forever" would not do that. he would not call up the national guard to protect the marchers in his state. and so president johnson did. and when they did finally complete that march, not hundreds strong, but now thousands strong, and martin luther king jr. gave his "how long, not long" speech on the steps of the state capitol in montgomery, those marchers were protected by the national guard, by order of the president of the united states. yes, there were alabama national guardsmen there, but the national part of that is important. they were there on the president's orders. in every state, the governor is technically the commander in chief of his or her state's national guard. but the guard is part of the united states' military. and so, yeah, governor wallace did have authority over the guard in his state, but not more authority than federal law and the u.s. department of defense
and the president of the united states. on june 26th of this year, the supreme court threw out the federal law that forbid federal recognition of marriages by same-sex couples. that same day as the ruling, the u.s. defense department announced that it would take all necessary steps to bring defense department policies and practices in compliance with the ruling. so the ruling was the end of june. by mid-august, the defense department announced that their computer systems and their operating procedures were all being updated. by september 3rd, the defense department said, they expected to be able to recognize and treat all married couples equally in the military. by september 3rd, all couples in the military -- not just the straight ones -- all married couples would have equal access to the logistical facts of military life that make all the difference in terms of how you and your family live, day to day. spousal i.d. cards, to get access to military bases and access to health care and the housing allowance that families get. being table to use the commissaries and pxs on base. also the really big stuff, like being formally listed as next of kin if your loved one dies in action or dies in an accident.
the court ruling mandating equal access to stuff like that happened in june 26. by september 3rd, the entire defense department was in compliance with that court ruling, and everybody was being treated equally. except, except for some states that had anti-gay marriage laws still on the books at the state level, who decided that they would not comply with this federal ruling and this federal direction from the defense department. governors and national guard generals in these states are refusing to comply. texas, indiana, georgia, florida, mississippi, louisiana, oklahoma, south carolina, west virginia. it's federal law. this is a part of the u.s. military. as "the new york times" noted this week, the applications for i.d. cards are federal form processed by federal employees on a federal computer system. but in these nine states, they're saying, states' rights. they're saying because they have anti-gay laws at the state levels, they will not process service members' applications
equally. they are defying federal law so they can keep discriminating against some members of the national guard, against the wishes of the u.s. military. tonight, secretary of defense chuck hagel, just moments ago, actually, a few blocks from here, he has just given a rather remarkable and confrontational speech at a dinner for the anti-defamation league here in new york, calling out nine states that are defying the defense department and defying federal law in order to keep discriminating. texas, apparently, was the first state to announce that they were going to do this, but now it is nine states altogether and the secretary says that among these nine states, there are 114 army national guard and air national guard bases that are refusing equal treatment to military same-sex couples. and here is secretary of defense, chuck hagel, speaking just moments ago. >> when the supreme court issued its decision on the defense of marriage act this summer, the department of defense
immediately began working on providing same benefits to all spouses regardless of sexual orientation. we did it because everyone who serves our country in uniform, everyone in this country, should receive all the benefits they deserve and they've earned and in accordance with the law. everyone's rights must be protected. this means that all spouses of service members are entitled to d.o.d. i.d. cards and the benefits that come with them. but several states today are refusing to issue these i.d. cards to same-sex spouses at national guard facilities. not only does this violate the state's obligations under federal law, but their actions have created hardship and inequality by forcing couples to travel long distances to federal military bases to obtain the i.d. cards they're entitled to.
this is wrong. it causes division among our ranks and it furthers prejudice, which d.o.d. has fought to extinguish, as has the adl. today, i directed the chief of the national guard bureau, general frank grass, to make immediate action to remedy this situation. at my direction, he will meet with the adjunct general from the states where these i.d. cards are being declined and denied. the general will be expected to comply with lawful direction and d.o.d. policy, in line with the practices of 45 other states and jurisdictions. whether they are responding to natural disasters here at home, in their states, or fighting in afghanistan, our national guardsmen all wear the uniform of the united states of america. they are serving this country. they and their families are entitled to all the benefits and respect according toed to all of our military men and women.
>> that was secretary of defense chuck hagel speaking just moments ago in new york city tonight. setting up a confrontation between the pentagon and the government of nine red states. these states that the pentagon says are not treating service members the way they ought to be treated. the defense department told us tonight that it will not just be this speech, that if these states do not change their policies to get in line with federal law, as the defense secretary just explained, the pentagon told us tonight that the defense secretary, quote, is prepared to take further action the to get these states into compliance. we will post a transcript of the secretary's remarks at maddowblog tonight and more of the tape of his speech as soon as we can get it in. we'll be right back.
behold, the mayor to have the great city of toronto, the largest city in all of canada and the fourth largest city in north america. behold! >> can you get off my driveway, please? can you get off my property, please? >> -- that you're involved in -- >> can you get off my driveway, please?! can you get off my driveway?! can you get off my property, please! okay, get off my property! >> i'm leaving! >> get off my property! >> i'm leaving! >> thank you. thank you so much! get off my property!
thank you. >> we're off your property. tell us about your -- >> what don't you understand? get off the property, partner. get off the -- thank you. thank you very much. >> are you the focus of a police drug investigation related to sandro lisi, mr. mayor? what can you tell us about -- >> thank you. thank you. >> sure you don't want to comment, sir? also, i don't think that man was his partner. that was the mayor of toronto, whose name is rob ford. to the extent that rob ford is internationally famous, he is famous for this. rob ford in crack cocaine video scandal! in may of this year, the "toronto star" reported allegations that mayor ford was seen in a cell phone video smoking the aforementioned crack. two reporters from the paper said they personally saw this video, which is being shopped around at the time by a group of drug dealers in the city, but it was not just the "star" that saw the video. it was also the website gawker. gawker's editor traveled up to toronto, met with the guy who was shopping the video around,
and then reported what he saw on tape. mayor ford is the only person visible in the frame seated in a room in a house. in one hand is a lighter. ford is red faced and sweaty heaving with each breath. he finds his moment and lights up. these allegations that the mayor of toronto is seen on a videotape smoking crack, that became front page news in canada and in this country and to a certain extent around the world. rob ford denied the whole thing. he denied that he smoked crack ever and that there was a video of him smoking crack. gawker started raising money to buy the video from the drug dealers. they raised $200,000 to buy the video. then after they finally raised the requested amount of cash, their source in toronto vanished along with the video. for months it seemed like the end of the story.
no video. no proof. that was the last we heard of it until today. today at a rather hastily called press conference, toronto's chief of police dropped a bombshell saying they had been investigating the crack pipe allegations against the mayor all these months and he disclosed what the police investigation has turned up. watch. >> we are now in possession of a recovered digital video file relevant to the investigations that have been conducted. that file contains video images which appear to be those images which were previously reported in the press. i think it's fair to say that the mayor does appear in that video, but i'm not going to get into the detail of what activities is depicted on that video. >> the toronto police chief confirming today that his office
has the tape. they have the tape that reportedly shows the mayor smoking crack. as you heard the police chief say there, he would not describe exactly what is on the video. he said contents of the video appear to be those images which were previously reported in the press. the images previously reported in the press were images of the mayor smoking crack. sounds like that is what it is. reports first started coming out this morning. you see the press swarmed the mayor's house to try to get a comment from hem on the latest developments. that did not go well. when mayor ford turned up at work and went to city hall, he did call a press conference to address the allegations. this was the whole thing. watch. this is amazing. >> i think everybody has seen the allegations against me today. i wish i could come out and defend myself. unfortunately i can't because it's before the courts and that's all i can say right now.
>> what's before the courts? >> i think -- i think -- no, you know what? no. i have no reason to resign. i'm going to go back and return my phone calls. i'm going to be out doing what the people elected me to do and run the great government that's been running for the past three years. all i can say is -- >> is this acceptable behavior for a mayor? >> have you lied to the people of toronto? >> that was it. >> that was it. the mayor then went back to his office to return calls apparently. toronto is the fourth largest city in north america behind mexico city, new york city and los angeles. then rob ford.
that's the guy in charge of the fourth largest city in north america for now. this has always been a strange story. as of tonight this is a still unraveling story. >> get off my driveway, please. get off my driveway. can you get off my property, please. for those nights when it's more than a bad dream, be ready. for the times you need to double-check the temperature on the thermometer, be ready. for high fever, nothing works faster or lasts longer. be ready with children's motrin.
best new thing in the world. happy halloween. a holiday that originally marked the end of the harvest season, the beginning of winter. time of year when people particularly in the north start saying good-bye to sunlight. but before you start feeling too seasonally affected sorry for yourself, be thankful you don't live in this town in norway that sits between two mountains so high and too steep the sunlight is blocked by the mountains so they don't get short sunlit days in winter from september to march every year.
until now. you may have heard this week about their new work around. they installed giant mirrors on top of one of the mountains. one happy stop with the sun starved norwegians feel the winter sun or their faces for first time ever. this is great to sun starved norwegians but a tribute to the genius of "the simpsons." remember the cliff-hanger season six where we learn about the plan to block the sun from shining on springfield so the people there have to buy more power from his nuclear power plant. remember? >> since the beginning of time man has yearned to destroy the sun. i will do the next best thing. block it out. >> good god. >> imagine it. electrical lights and heaters
running all day long. take one last look at the sun, springfield. >> so when they turned on the magic mirrors in norway this week, norway became the anti-mr. burns. it was life imitating "the simpsons." what's better than that is "simpsons" imitating life. >> hello, kent. >> well, well, well, rachel maddow, everyone came back for chip's funeral. >> i was flying from d.c. to new york and had a layover in springfield. how is the gang at channel 6? >> just because you made it big and i didn't doesn't mean i'm bitter. >> is that your car? >> maybe. >> kent, i'm going to tell you the most important mistake you ever made after this break. so, kent, that mistake you made, that fundamental life changing
error, that cosmic fail -- >> just tell me already. >> after this break. >> i will never achieve anything this cool ever again in my life. it's "the simpsons" sunday night. that does it for us tonight. . good friday morning. right now on "first look," a tire guying scene for any parent. a school bus carrying ten children plunges into a creek. >> i thought i was going to die. >> we'll have the incredible details coming up next. did president obama seriously consider replacing vice president biden with hillary clinton? and how does mr. obama really feel about former president clinton. fascinating details. and using electronics for the flying masses. plus a really bad day for this $300,000 ferrari. and sights and sounds of a he