tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC August 2, 2014 3:00am-4:01am PDT
no details too small. american express open forum. this is what membership is. this is what membership does. 44%, that's how much latino vote that george bush got back in the 2004 presidential election. bush had come out in favor of a guest worker program. when he hit that 44% number, that became a new high water mark for republican presidential candidate among latino voters. not even ronald reagan back in 1984, that was the year he won 49 states in what was an epic landslide, not even ronald reagan did as well with latino voters as george w. bush did in 2004. here's the next data point, 31%.
that's how much of the latino vote that john mccain got in 2008. mccain did a big about face on the issue of immigration during that campaign. he led the push for the path to citizenship and then he faced a revolt from the right. he disavowed his own plan and then he only got 31% of the latino vote and he lost to barack obama. and then 27%, 27% of the latino vote, that's what mitt romney got in 2012. 27%. very hard to win a presidential election when you do that badly with members of such a big group and so romney, like mccain, lost the election. again, i don't know if you can call three data points a ski slope. but this downward slide from the 44% that bush got in 2004 to the 31% that mccain got in 2008, all the way down to the 27% that
mitt romney got, that's not what any political party wants to see. in the case of mitt romney in 2012, there's a reason -- there's very little question why it happened. there's a reason why it happened. the reason has to do with this. he had spent the republican primary season piling up sound bites like these. >> we went to the company, look, i'm running for office for pete's sake, i can't have illegals. amnesty is a magnet. when we have had -- what we have had in the past, people who have come here legally are going to get to stay legally for the rest of their life, that's only going to encourage more people to come here illegally. if i were elected and congress were to pass the dream act, would i veto it? the answer is yes. >> this is how romney got the republican nomination in 2012. this is how he won over the skeptical conservatives, all those skeptical conservatives who weren't sure if he was one of them. he spent the primary season playing the tough guy. the toughest of the tough guys on the issue of immigration
reform. and of course when the primary season ended anyone could see this was going to cost him big in the general election. this was maybe going to cost him enough votes to doom his candidacy. so as romney emerged, as he said all the hard-line things about immigration, republicans decided to try to throw him a life line. and the plan was to have republican senator marco rubio introduce a bill that would offer protection to some of the young dreamers. these are the children who had been brought here at a young age by undocumented parents. romney was going to endorse the plan that rubio drew up. and here is the beautiful part of this. president obama was already taking heat at this moment for the record number of deportations that had occurred on his watch. the deporter in chief. that's the term some critics were calling him. so republicans saw a golden opportunity. they would be the ones offering a helping hand to those young and idealistic dreamers. you know, obama would be forced
to sign their bill. this was how they were going to undo all of the damage that romney had done on the issue of immigration in the primaries. only problem? deporter in chief didn't want to play along. instead, president obama did something. he headed them off. he used a preemptive measure. he took executive action. in june of 2012, president obama announced his own miniature dream act. this affected more than 800,000 people. instead of deporting those dreamers the president directed his administration to offer them a legal means to stay in this country. republicans had blocked legislative attempts to do that so president obama used his executive authority to defer hundreds of thousands of deportations. essentially on his say so. people lined up for applications throughout the u.s. this was a big deal. this was in the middle of the presidential campaign. and with that executive action
by president obama, mitt romney's grand strategy for winning back some of the latino vote he had lost, that grand strategy exploded on the spot. he couldn't come out and say he was against what obama had just done. that would have been even more politically suicidal than anything he said in the primaries. but he couldn't say he was for it, because after all, he had hung his campaign on never saying that obama was right about anything. so mitt romney was stuck. it was obvious immediately, it was obvious when he was asked if he was president if he would abide by the presidential action that obama had taken. >> what would you do about it? >> well, as you know, he was president for the last 3 1/2 years. did nothing on immigration. i said for instance, that those who serve in the military i would give permanent residence to. >> sure. would you repeal this? >> well, it would be overtaken by evens by virtue of my putting in place a long term solution with legislation, which creates law, that relates to these
individuals. such that they know what their setting will be. not just for the term of the president, but on a permanent basis. >> i won't keep on about this. but to make sure i understand, would you leave this in place while you worked out a long term solution or would you just repeal it? >> we'll look at that setting as we reach that. >> it was painful to watch romney go through that. for republicans it was infuriating. they never got over it either. and this turns out to be helpful information to remember as republicans in congress now, this week, tonight, in the year 2014 stage one of the more riveting meltdowns in recent political history. because when you hear republicans howling these days about president obama and his use of executive action or executive orders, some of that anger comes from recent decisions but a lot of it, probably most of it, really goes back to that moment in the 2012 campaign. they were hopping mad about
obama using his executive authority and immigration. using it in a way that ruined their last best chance to make inroads with latino voters. house speaker john boehner has used executive orders as a rallying cry for his base and far-right republicans have talked about impeaching the president. voters say they don't want impeachment and neither does john boehner. but they got them to vote for suing the president. oddly suing the president for delaying part of health reform which they have voted to repeal dozens of times. but they voted to sue the president for delaying part of the health care law. all but five lined up to pass that red meat legislation. they were unified, and all together on wednesday. then on thursday, disaster. tens of thousands of unaccompanied kids having crossed into the u.s. being held in detention with that very real crisis still playing out along
our southern border, and boehner announced yesterday morning that republicans would hold two votes related to the crisis. the first would increase money for security at the border and to get conservative votes on for that one, boehner scheduled a second vote. a vote on a bill that would try to keep obama from issuing executive orders. and then specifically would curb that minidream act he created with his executive action back in 2012. two votes on two republican bills. that was the plan, boehner said. but yesterday came, yesterday went, those votes in the house, they never happened. boehner had to yank his own bills off the floor because he didn't have the republican support that he needed. he didn't have 218 republicans to vote yes. republican party essentially killed its own republican bills. on its own. and that was amazing. but what was stunning really is how the republican leadership responded to that failure yesterday. on thursday, they told the president to take more
unilateral actions. quote, there are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now without the need for congressional action. if that sounds like republicans calling for executive action the day after condemning executive action, wait until you hear the republican try to explain it. >> there was a contradiction yesterday that i'm struggling to understand. the leadership statement when the bill didn't pass essentially said, well, there are plenty of administrative things that president obama could be doing at the border and that was a day after the house voted to sue president obama for taking administrative action. so how does that square? >> well, i'm not going to disagree with you because it's the point i made myself in conference. look, you can't say on the one hand that the president's overreaching by acting without legislative authority and direction and then refuse to give him direction in another area.
so i don't disagree with what you have to say at all. >> this is one of those washington dramas that if you try to make sense of it, you're bound to get dizzy and pass out. the whole idea of putting this border bill together and passing it this week, john boehner's whole idea was so that republicans could tell everyone they had stared in the face of the crisis of the border and they had done something, they had acted, they had led and today after that debacle on thursday, they spent the morning making minor changes to the bills. trying to get more intent on finally getting them through. one of the changes would phase out the president's 2012 directive for the dreamers, that took the wind out of romney's sails at the height of the campaign. that directive that republicans had been cursing for two years now. and it looks like finally, boehner is getting what he wants tonight. yesterday spectacle scared enough republicans into line for the two bills to pass the house. just minutes ago. house republicans passed the first of them. the second one is being debated
as we speak, but think of this. we have now just had 24 hours of drama and recriminations and screaming headlines about pulled bills, about chaos, finger points among the republicans in congress. the idea of this from john boehner's standpoint was for republicans to show people they had done something. but is anyone's take away going to be oh, that's great, republicans passed a bill or is the take away, wow, congress is as messed up as we thought it was? average voters may not know or care whether it's house republicans or house democrats who are screwing up here. but they do know that congress isn't working. if they absorbed anything in the last 24 hours, it's probably that. and that in turn, the fact that's what most people probably take away from this, that makes it much easier for obama to argue he has no choice, but to do that one thing that republicans want to stop him so badly from doing. to use executive action. >> house republicans suggested that since they don't expect to
actually pass a bill that i can sign that i actually should go ahead and act on my own to solve the problem. keep in mind that just a few days earlier they voted to sue me for acting on my own and then when they couldn't pass a bill yesterday, they put out a statement suggesting i should act on my own because they couldn't pass a bill. they can't pass the bill. they can't even pass their own version of the bill. so that's a not a disagreement between me and the house republicans. that's a disagreement between the house republicans and the house republicans. and it -- in circumstances where even basic common sense, plain vanilla legislation can't pass, because house republicans consider it somehow a compromise of their principles or giving
obama a victory, then we've got to take action. >> the president today is saying he has to take steps to address the board -- border crisis during the upcoming recess. he has to act. so the same house republicans who have been so enraged over the unilateral actions of the president have made more unilateral action more inevitable. the question is how expansive that might be. the certainty though is that republicans are not going to like it. joining us now is christina belin tony, the editor-in-chief at roll call. some breaking news. so the white house before we came on the air, the white house put out a statement. the house about an hour ago passed the first of the two bills and the second one apparently will be voted on and probably passed later tonight. the white house is calling this partisan legislation that will not address the problem and is sure to be rejected by the senate and then in the statement
also reiterating the call for republicans to sit down and address comprehensive immigration reform when they come back from their recess. so the politics of this, from the republican standpoint, they get these two bills through tonight. the whole idea here was they knew these were going to die in the senate, they wanted to say they did something. from a political standpoint, given all the drama that it took to pass the two things did they get the positive headline they wanted out of this? >> i mean, that's a difficult question to answer because, no, of course not. right? we're sitting here talking about this. the only way it could have really been worse is if they were doing this debate in this building behind me at 3:00 or 4:00 in the morning. they have done that, they have pushed it to the brink. both parties have many, many times. at least they're getting out of town at a reasonable hour i suppose. but there's also a sense of giving up because when you look at this debate and the amount of time that they allowed for debate on both the procedural rule that says the framework for
debate and then the actual bill, they didn't take nearly all of the time that they had allotted for them, because nobody wanted to talk about it. you didn't pass the bill, the president would veto it. it's going nowhere. they all know that. the big issue here is what lawmakers hear when they go home to their constituents. funny things happen during august recesses. we saw it during the health care town hall debates in 2010. right before those elections where you really saw a lot of intense scrutiny, or in 2009, the year before health care passed when you really saw the scrutiny on the health care bill. that's when that legislation started to fall apart. when lawmakers start hearing from the voters back home, that changes things. who knows what they're going to say when people get back tomorrow morning.
>> of course they were in a hurry to pass it tonight. if there's one thing that gets lawmakers' attention these days, it's missed vacation time. i've found that to be the ace. let's look at sort of where it goes from here. this is the same week -- the irony is striking to me, this is the same week the republican house votes to sue the president over his use of executive action. this emerged as a huge rallying cry within the republican party to stop the president's overreach. at the same time, because of the way this all played out, because they couldn't get their signal straight, get their act together on this, it really looks now like an inevitability the president going to act with executive action on two fronts now. one, to address the crisis at the border because nothing is coming out of congress. then two, it seems to me, this gives him a lot of leeway now. terms of broader immigration reform to act on his own, say, look, america, you saw what congress is not capable of doing, i have no choice but to do this. >> that's possible. i will say the white house is really concerned about what's happening abroad right now, and domestic policy executive actions that change what laws existing, what law's in place.
what the house did tonight doesn't actually change anything. the president isn't forced to take any action to shore anything up or to further, you know, push immigration reform that was passed by the senate last year and isn't going to be passed by the house. he's not under any dire circumstance to do that, so they're very much focused on not inflaming any further tensions around the world. so that's one element of it. the actual spending for mitigating what's happening at the border with children is something like he's going to have to transfer the money from somewhere. and that is not an easy situation for the president to have. again, as you've pointed out, republicans have gone after him for taking manners into his own hands. so it puts him in a tough spot, but at the same time he's not actually forced to do anything for a while. it's the sort of crisis/noncrisis. even some of the reporting that we saw coming across the border, a lot of those numbers are being
reported a month after the fact. so some of the numbers are actually down right now because it's so hot with children coming across the border and it's the middle of summer. you're seeing fewer and fewer people come now than there were a few months ago when the crisis was at its peak. >> all right. and, again, just to recap the breaking news at this hour. there are two bills that republicans are trying to pass through the house tonight. the first one they've successfully gotten through that provides more money at the border. the second one they are debating right now. we're monitoring to see if and when they bring that to a vote. that is a second bill that would essentially phase out the deferred action program we described at the president implemented back in 2012. we'll keep on eye on that. for now, we want to thank christina bellanoti, editor in chief of my alma mater, "roll call." christina, appreciate that. have a great weekend. much more ahead tonight including escalating outrage over the cia's senate computer hacking mess. the very latest on that. later, we finally get our first look at a fancy piece of crucial evidence connected to bob mcdonnell. at last. you're not going to want to miss this. stay with us. hey get from alask, they think salmon and energy. but the energy bp produces up here
creates something else as well: jobs all over america. engineering and innovation jobs. advanced safety systems & technology. shipping and manufacturing. across the united states, bp supports more than a quarter million jobs. when we set up operation in one part of the country, people in other parts go to work. that's not a coincidence. it's one more part of our commitment to america. ♪ fill their bowl with the meaty tastes they're looking for, with friskies grillers. tender meaty pieces and crunchy bites. in delicious chicken, beef, turkey, and garden veggie flavors. friskies grillers.
yyyup. with xfinity internet soyour family can use all their devices at once. works anywhere in the house. even in the garage. max what's going on? we're doing a tech startup. we're streamlining an algorithm. we're going public! [cheering] the fastest in-home wifi for your entire family. the x-1 entertainment operating system. only from xfinity. you fifteen percent or more on huh, fiftcar insurance.uld save everybody knows that. well, did you know words really can hurt you? what...? jesse don't go! jesse...no! i'm sorry daisy, but i'm a loner. and a loner gotta be alone. heee yawww! geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. jesse? and spend your time working hard
to get to point "b". and "b" could be here... or even here. but for you, "b" is not the end. capella university will help take you further, because our competency-based curriculum is designed for your profession, to move you forward to where you want to be. your point "c". capella university. start your journey at capella.edu. when we talk about the do nothing congress these days, usually it means we're talking about the house of representatives. the people's house. which makes it easy to forget sometimes that congress is actually a bicameral legislature. there are two chambers. there's the house and there's the senate. and when it comes to the do-nothing label, well, there's a lot of do nothingness to go around. heading into this week out of all countries in the world, the united states maintains diplomatic missions. there are 169 in total. one quarter of them did not have an ambassador from our country.
that is 43 american embassies without a top diplomat. this isn't because there aren't people who don't want to do those jobs. this isn't because there aren't people who are qualified for those jobs. nominees for just about all the vacant ambassador jobs have been tapped by president obama and are standing by. suitcases and passports in hand. they are ready to go. but they're stuck here, stuck back home because of the senate. whose job it is to confirm the people the president nominates to be u.s. ambassadors. u.s. senate just can't or just won't get it together and confirm any of them. even places like russia where you might have heard that diplomatic relations have been a little tense lately, where this might be an opportune moment for the u.s. to have an ambassador on the ground, nor in guatemala, one of the three central american countries where all the children coming to the border are from. earlier this week when the senate foreign relations committee was close to a vote on nearly a dozen ambassador nominees, senator bob menendez,
he is the head of the committee, he found himself without enough senators to make a quorum and without a quorum, you can't hold a vote. so that means a bunch of senators decided they were not going to show up. >> next order of business is 11 nominees that i asked to be considered in block without objection. ambassador of the republic of guatemala, ambassador of guatemala, ambassador of monaco, kazakhstan, mr. alan musser for turkmenistan, rwanda, republic of turkey. senator corker, is there any -- >> i got all the proxies here. these folks are famously supported, so i look forward to us having enough members to vote them out. >> any other members wishing to speak to any of these nominees? okay. we have now come to the end where we need bodies to vote. so --
>> so. that was tuesday. and actually there ended up being progress that day. after that awkwardness, menendez got his quorum and a dozen would-be ambassadors moved from one step closer to actually getting confirmed and being able to work. the clock was ticking because that was tuesday. the senate was set to shut down on thursday. 48 hours later. it was set to head off out of town for a month-long vacation. so menendez frantically went to the floor of the senate and he pleaded with his colleagues for a batch vote to vote on 25 nominees for ambassadorships at once. to get them confirmed, to get them working. all before the senate skipped town. it was clear this time around that he wasn't amused. >> i repeat, the criteria for confirming nominees should not be determined by a sudden, just breaking crisis, with the urgent need to fill a vacant post. confirmation by crisis is not a strategy.
and it is not in the national security interest of the united states. the senate standoff that has left so many career foreign service nominees in political and personal limbo is damaging our credibility. undermining our national security, and it has to end now. >> now, if there are magic words to get ambassadors confirmed, those weren't them. because republican senator mike enzi then blocked every attempt to get a floor vote to fill any of those vacancies. enzi blamed the democrats. he's still mad and republicans are still mad the democrats changed the senate rules last year when republicans were doing this same kind of blockade against president obama's nominees for federal judgeships. so blocking obama's would-be ambassadors is, enzi said, now a matter of principle for republicans. as some of obama's picks for the posts are definitely political appointees, political in nature. these are loyal political allies who are getting a reward for their political alliance with the president. but the majority of them are
what are called career foreign service officers. these are people who serve under multiple administrations, republican administrations, democratic administrations. they are not partisan. these are people who have been at it for years. this afternoon, the president addressed the issue in his brief press conference that was mostly directed at congress. >> there are a lot of things we could be arguing about on policy. that's what we should be doing as a democracy, but we shouldn't be having an argument about placing career diplomats with bipartisan support in countries around the world where we have to have a presence. >> and so after all of this this week, we have some news for you. the senate actually did finally do something. they confirmed the u.s. ambassador to russia. that's 1 down, 42 to go, and one long vacation that's already begun. i don't use super poligrip for hold because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between
my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food particles out. [ charlie ] try zinc free super poligrip. hey there, i just got my bill, and i see that it includes my fico® credit score. yup, you get it free each month to help you avoid surprises with your credit. good. i hate surprises. surprise! at discover, we treat you like you'd treat you. get the it card and see your fico® credit score. ♪ [music] defiance is in our bones. defiance never grows old. citracal maximum. easily absorbed calcium plus d. beauty is bone deep.
say "hi" rudy. [ barks ] [ chuckles ] i'd do anything to keep this guy happy and healthy. that's why i'm so excited about these new milk-bone brushing chews. whoa, i'm not the only one. it's a brilliant new way to take care of his teeth. clinically proven as effective as brushing. ok, here you go. have you ever seen a dog brush his own teeth? the twist and nub design cleans all the way down to the gum line, even reaching the back teeth. they taste like a treat, but they clean like a toothbrush. nothing says you care like a milk-bone brushing chew.
there's some actual activity playing out in the nation's capitol on this friday night. now, right now, the house is in the middle of debating the second of two bills that republicans have been trying all week to muster enough votes for. earlier tonight, this is after yesterday, after an aborted attempt to bring the bills to the floor yesterday, earlier tonight, republicans successfully passed the first of these two bills. this is a bill that would provide more money for border enforcement. this is a bill that would also make it easier, change a 2008 law to make it easier for officials to deport some of these children from central america that have been coming across the border. that passed on a largely party-line vote of 223-189 within the last hour. now, the second bill is being debated. a bill republican leaders have introduced to drum up support
among conservative members. a bill that would address the 2012 deferred action program that president obama implemented. this is a program that allows some children who came to this country undocumented children who came to this country illegally with their parents to stay. it defers deportations for them. this bill would keep the president from expanding that program and it would eventually phase that program out. we're expecting a vote on that provision imminently. we will bring you the result when we have it. and just to let you know, this seems to be a purely symbolic exercise because already the white house tonight has called both of these bills, quote, partisan legislation that will not address the problem. senator harry reid, he's the majority leader in the u.s. senate, he has said he, quote, can't imagine the senate taking up either one of these bills. still, the second of those two will be voted on very soon. we'll bring you the latest as we have it.
crestor lowered bad cholesterol in it's a fact. high-risk patients more than lipitor. bad cholesterol... you're going down! yeah! lowering cholesterol is a big deal, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors, because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over time. so, when diet and exercise aren't enough to lower cholesterol, adding crestor can help. i'm down with crestor!
crestor is not right for everyone, like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired; have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. are you down with crestor!? ask your doctor if crestor could help you. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. so, what'd you think of the house? did you see the school rating? oh, you're right. hey, babe, i got to go. bye, daddy. have a good day at school, okay? ♪ [ man ] but what about when my parents visit? okay. just love this one. it's next to a park. [ man ] i love it. i love it, too. here's your new house. ♪ daddy! [ male announcer ] you're not just looking for a house. you're looking for a place for your life to happen. zillow.
honey, look i got one to land. uh-huh. (vo) there's good more... honey, look at all these smart rewards points verizon just gave me. ooh, you got a buddy. i'm like a statue. i just signed up and, boom, all these points. ...and there's not-so-good more. you're a big guy... ...oh no. get the good more with verizon smart rewards and rack up points to use towards the things you really want. get the lg g3 for $199.99. and you're looking live, to borrow a phrase, at the floor of the u.s. house of representatives. that society we were just telling you about is now under way. the second of two pieces of border security legislation republicans are trying to pass the house tonight. we will bring you the latest on that vote when it finishes. it is now under way. now we want to turn to a story involving the other
chamber of congress. a brief moment back in march of 2013 when it was a legitimate news story. a big news story that rand paul had to use the bathroom. it was a legitimate news story because the moment that he had to go to the bathroom also was the moment that it officially guaranteed that we were going to get a new guy heading up the cia. let me explain how that worked. it was just after midnight on march 7th, 2013. rand paul was on the senate floor in what was the 12th hour of a filibuster. paul was against president obama's nominee to head the cia. he was so against it that he decided to stage one of those old-fashioned real life talking filibusters. you don't see him too much in washington anymore. nomination couldn't get a vote. it couldn't get through until and unless rand paul stopped talking. the nominee's name was john brennan. what paul opposed specifically about brennan's nomination to head the cia was the agency's
drone program. its unmanned drones. drones, of course, the cia uses to secretly target and kill what it says are terrorists but what many cases end up being innocent civilians killed as collateral damage. countries like pakistan and yemen. paul was and still is opposed to the drone program and wanted more information about the program brought to light. so filibustering john brennan's nomination to run the cia was going to be his way of doing that. was going to be his way of drawing attention to this issue. since you can't leave the senate floor while you are filibustering something, that's what the rules say, paul went on and on and on for hour after hour until he got to the point that we will all eventually get to, the point where you just can't ignore nature's call any longer. >> and i would go for another 12 hours to try to break strom thurmond's record, but i discovered there are some limits to filibustering an i'm going to have to go take care of one of those in a few moments here. >> and you probably remember
that night if you think back just over year ago. rand paul got a lot of attention because he staged that filibuster. still, for all of that attention, this was a symbolic filibuster. everyone knew that john brennan had the votes he needed to be confirmed as the cia director. the next day he was, indeed, confirmed. there were 63 senators who voted for him. there were also, however, 34 who voted against him and 31 of those were republicans. so the narrative that took shape was the opposition to john brennan's nomination as cia chief was basically republican opposition. this was opposition that was inspired by rand paul. but that's actually not the full story on john brennan. because that's not really where it all started. that's not where the opposition came from because actually last year wasn't the first time that brennan faced vocal and public opposition as a potential obama nominee. right after president obama was first elected, this is back in 2008, this is before he even took the oath of office, this is when he was first just figuring out who he was going to appoint to what job in his administration. go all the way back to then,
obama's team floated the name of john brennan to be the potential new head of the cia. and in a way when they did this, it made sense. brennan was a veteran of the agency. he had worked under the previous cia director. a man named george tenet. so he certainly knew the intelligence world very well. but when his name was floated back in 2008, after the election, when that happened, the outcry was swift and it was punishing. it was also effective. also it didn't come from republicans. it came from democrats. it came from the left. president obama's base, these are the people who just helped him to win the election. they were horrified that obama was thinking of picking someone connected to the bush cia. someone connected to the bush cia's enhanced interrogation program. liberals revolted and obama heard them when they revolted. because of that, john brennan didn't become the cia director back in 2008. in late november of that year, he wrote a letter defending himself against the charges he
was responsible for the torture policy of the bush cia. he said he had no decision-making authority at the cia at that time. and at the same time, he withdrew his nomination from consideration. his potential nomination. so that was the backdrop to that filibuster against john brennan that rand paul staged five years later. in march of last year. in march of 2013. and now, this week, we're discovering that that filibuster also wasn't the end of the story. because john brennan is back in the news right now in a very big way. he's back in the news at the center of a gigantic controversy. with the cia that he runs now admitting this week that it has spied on members of congress. it is admitting to something that brennan, until very recently, was assuring everyone who talked about it, he was assuring it was a crazy idea, suggesting the cia could do this. now the cia is admitting to trying to get the justice department to prosecute congressional staffers based on its spying. john brennan is now apologizing for what his agency did, and also for what he, himself, did when the allegations first emerged earlier this year.
so now think about this. it was about a year ago rand paul tried to derail his nomination, a year ago 31 republicans stood with him and voted against brennan. it's not likely there's a deep reservoir of trust there. after all, in 2008, democrats stood in his way of running the cia. now add that together. the newer more recent republican opposition in all of those old suspicions from democrats, and now factor in this huge new scandal. the fact that brennan's cia was spying on members of congress. add all of that together and conclude john brennan doesn't have many friends on capitol hill these days. that puts president obama, the guy who appointed him in the first place, that puts him in a tricky spot. democratic senator dianne feinstein railing against the cia on the senate floor. you've got democratic senator mark
udall now calling for john
brennan's resignation. also got senator martin hinrich, also a democrat in the senate intelligence committee. you've got another democrat, oregon senator ron wyden calling for potential criminal charges filed against whoever it was in the cia who spied on the senate. >> if a 19-year-old hacker searched senate files this way, that hacker would be sitting in jail right now. i want a public accounting at this point. i want to know who authorized this act. i want to know why they thought it was legal, and i want to know who is going to be legally held responsible. >> and now tonight, the first republican senator to all for brennan's resignation has emerged, not surprisingly, it is senator rand paul. president today said he has, quote, full confidence in john brennan as director of the cia, even as he went on to talk about the poor judgment the cia showed when it decided it was a good idea to spy on congress. joining us, siobhan gorman, the intelligence correspondent at "the wall street
journal." thanks for joining us tonight.
you know, you have mark udall, martin hinrich, now rand paul tonight. outlined the history, democratic and republican in terms of being suspicious or or hostile toward john brennan. is there a risk right now at this hour of this thing widening in a quick and big way in terms of senators speaking out? >> well, i think you will probably hear more and more senators speaking out as they digest the inspector general report that was partially made public yesterday. i haven't heard enough of an outcry at this point that would suggest his job is under some sort of threat, but there have been calls for a renewed justice department investigation, things like that. certainly if there were a new investigation that turned up something more significant, you might see more momentum around that kind of thing. >> explain for people, who listen to this and haven't been paying much attention, they're wondering given the democratic opposition to brennan, the ties to the bush administration, how much obama, himself, ran against that in 2008. given all that, what is president obama's attachment to
brennan in the first place? >> well, mr. brennan was a very early convert to the obama campaign. he was a close adviser during the 2008 campaign on intelligence matters. and he ran the -- well, i guess, he was a co-chair of the transition team for intelligence matters in 2008. and because of that work, he was considered to be possibly nominated for cia director. when he withdrew from that potential position, mr. obama installed him as his top counterterrorism adviser and he and the president grew very, very close. he is a very trusted adviser of the president. continues to be. and that's not something that the president's probably going to walk away from very quickly. >> so the context for all of this is there is this torture report that all of washington's been talking about that's apparently going to be released next week. a torture report the senate has been working on, very exhaustive, what exactly the cia was doing, they call it enhanced
interrogation. president obama himself today at his press conference called this torture. that made headlines. after he made that statement, dianne feinstein, senator dianne feinstein said this report apparently is heavily redacted at the behest of the cia. what do you make of president obama coming out today and bluntly saying, i think the words he used were, there were folks who were tortured. >> yeah. i think he said, we tortured some folks. >> there it is. yeah. >> i think what we saw with president obama today was trying to walk this fine line where he was still strongly backing his former adviser and now cia director john brennan and the same time aligning himself with senate democrats. it's tough to align yourself with two parties who are battling it out right now. that seems to be what he was doing in advance of this report which is certainly going to catch people's attention from all the indications we've gotten. >> yeah, i mean, tell us a little more fact what you're hearing about this report. again, the idea of heavy redactions, dianne feinstein coming out and saying this. some people were looking at this
and saying, is president obama coming forward today and actually using the word torture in this context? is this as blunt as it's going to get when you look at all the redactions that might have taken place here? >> yeah. i think what the senate is going to have to decide, what the senate committee is going to have to decide, is how much they want to push back on these redactions because the more they push back, the longer the delay will be in actually making it public which is something they very much want to do. and it's tough to know what specifically we'll learn from it. i mean, there have been plenty of dribs and drabs of information that have come out. so we have kind of the broad outlines. we know it's highly critical and we know it talks about the cia misleading the justice department and congress. so, you know, it will be interesting to see what details are actually ultimately made public. >> all right. siobhan gorman from "the wall street journal." appreciate your time tonight. one of the wildest political events of the year is coming up this weekend. i'll tell you all about it right ahead.
dentures are very different to real teeth. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains. that's why i recommend polident. [ male announcer ] cleaner, fresher, brighter every day. but you're not done. capella university can help take your career even further, with the most direct path to your point "c". capella university. start your journey at capella.edu.
wwithout the time and money to wash all this stuff separately. so we wash it all in cold water with tide. even sara's shorts. those are mine. seriously? throw it all in... really? because tide cleans better. even in cold. ♪ [music] defiance is in our bones. defiance never grows old. citracal maximum. easily absorbed calcium plus d.
want to get lunch? get the fastest wifi hotspots and more coverage on the go than any other provider. xfinity, the future of awesome. >> you may be an ear, nose and threat doctor but you've misdiagnosed me. when it comes to me, you can't hear the truth, you can't smell the truth, and you sure as hell can't speak the truth. ladies and gentlemen, you all
can holler all you want, but you know what? tell them to cheer on my hide, it only grows back tougher. and i've been around a while and i'm one tough. >> here's a programming note for you. this weekend brings with it one of the more quirky traditions in politics. it's an all out rough and tumble political jeer fest known as fancy farm. it's probably the equivalent of the british house of commons. that's where politicians hurl insult it is a public forum. the fancy farm picnic takes place in a tiny town of fancy farm, kentucky, hosted by the st. jerome catholic church. this is anything but a low key event. this weekend it's going to be the center of the american political universe. kentucky happens to be the home of the closest, the nastiest, the biggest senate race of the year.
every year, for the past 100 years or so, kentucky politicians have attended the picnic to shake hands and talk up the crowd. but these are not your everyday boring political stump speeches. politicians joke around, they insult one another. generally, they just loosen up in a way you would normally never see. the crowd is free to shout things at them, to heckle them, cheer them on. or to chant over them as loudly as they want. this is a political free for all. 20,000 people are expected to take place in the events tomorrow, to play raffle and bingo games and do their best to drown out the speeches of the candidates they don't like. after that impassioned speech before a particularly tough fancy farm crowd back in 2009, the one we just showed you there, kentucky attorney general jack conway had to apologize for his use of foul language. democratic consultant said, the
main thing for a candidate to understand is you don't want to do any harm to yourself that. is a legitimate warning, because fancy warm is one of the rowdiest political events of the year in kentucky or anywhere. kentucky politicians who show up to speak basically do so at their own risk. it is very easy to get swept up in the mood of the crowd, to say something you don't mean or to react poorly to the heckling of the audience. as the kentucky democratic party chairman says, that's the whole point. it's a rite of passage, to go down there and not to get flustered. the second you look off into the crowd or pay attention to what someone is yelling at you, you are off your game and then people are more vicious. politicians have come around with stinging insults to keep their cool. >> they did everything they
could. you know what, they couldn't stop us. not at the ballot box. so they launched a political witch-hunt to stop us. oh, look. i believe we have the lead witch here. >> if senator mcconnell had his way, his version of kentucky health care for our seniors would be to walk it off. let's just tell it like it is. if the doctors told senator mcconnell he had a kidney stone, he would refuse to pass it. >> i want to say how nice it is, how nice it is to see jerry back in the game. like the loyal democrat he is, he's taking orders from the obama campaign on how to run his daughter's campaign. [ crowd boos ]
they told him to make a pitch on the internet for women's vote and he sent a check to anthony weiner. >> and so tomorrow, mitch mcconnell and his democratic challenger, alison grimes, are going to face off at the fancy farm picnic again. they are currently neck and neck in the polls. this is just a few months before the midterm election. for both candidates showing up to fancy farm tomorrow is an absolute political must. senator rand paul, the attorney general of the state, they're also expected to speak. organizers are hoping for a slightly quieter crowd this year. after all, this is supposed to be a church event. but what fun would that be? so even if you despise political speeches, these speeches are
actually legitimately fun to watch. find out which insults were hurled this weekend on my show right here on msnbc. and thank you for your bravery. thank you colonel. thank you daddy. military families are uniquely thankful for many things, the legacy of usaa auto insurance can be one of them. if you're a current or former military member or their family, get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. it's how i look at life. especially now that i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem.
i was taking warfarin but wondered, could i focus on something better? my doctor told me about eliquis for three important reasons. one, in a clinical trial eliquis was proven to reduce the risk of stroke better than warfarin. two, eliquis had less major bleeding than warfarin. and three, unlike warfarin there's no routine blood testing. [ male announcer ] don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. those three important reasons are why i'm shooting for something better. eliquis. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor today
if eliquis is right for you. say "hi" rudy. [ barks ] [ chuckles ] i'd do anything to keep this guy happy and healthy. that's why i'm so excited about these new milk-bone brushing chews. whoa, i'm not the only one. it's a brilliant new way to take care of his teeth. clinically proven as effective as brushing. ok, here you go. have you ever seen a dog brush his own teeth? the twist and nub design cleans all the way down to the gum line, even reaching the back teeth. they taste like a treat, but they clean like a toothbrush. nothing says you care like a milk-bone brushing chew. [ barks ] nothing says you care like a milk-bone brushing chew. my motheit's delicious. toffee in the world. so now we've turned her toffee into a business. my goal was to take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. i never really thought i would make money doing what i love. we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side.
we have an update to our top story tonight. just moments ago, house republicans narrowly passed on a party line vote, the second piece of their border agenda. earlier tonight, house republicans finally managed to pass a border funding bill that they had to yank from the house floor yesterday. the price of getting republicans to vote for that bill was also to vote for a second bill, an entirely symbolic bill, to end president obama's 2012 executive order that defers deportations oh so-called dreamers. immigrants brought to the united states illegally as kids. neither of these bills are going after tonight. senator harry reid said he can't imagine picking up either one of them and the white house is dismissing them as partisan legislation that will not address the problem.
but the news of the moment, the house voted on the second of two border bills and passed by a vote of 216-192. that does it for us tonight. as rachel would tell you if she were here, weekends with alex wit is up next. cause of death, how a new york man died as police brought him to the ground. hear what police are saying about the incident. no let up in gaza. new fighting as the fate of an israeli soldier remains a mystery. and the story surrounding his disappearance keeps changing. drama to the last minute on capitol hill as congress scrambles into its recess. what exactly was accomplished. it is not bridgegate but one issue could be looming for a political pit fall for governor chris christie.