tv All In With Chris Hayes MSNBC October 30, 2015 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT
coming among all three major candidates, trump, carson, rubio, and because of a strong showing in iowa cruz will still be there. if donald trump has his stuff, he'll fight this out till cleveland. if he has the stuff he'll either win the nomination or have to be okay with who does. either way he goes back to gotham a winner. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> gotcha. >> republican candidates stage a coup, holding a secret meeting without the rnc. >> don't overly micromanage the process. >> while reince priebus is doing damage control. >> i just can't tell you how pissed off i am. >> then jeb bush ramps up his attacks on marco rubio and tries to reassure panicked donors. >> it's going fine. >> are you having any fun? >> oh, yeah. you saw it. having lots of fun. >> plus the white house announces it will deploy u.s. commandos to syria, despite
assurances there would be no boots on the ground. >> the mission of our men and women on the ground has not changed. >> we'll look at the shifting strategy against isis. >> the challenge that we face in syria today is nothing less than to chart a course out of hell. and hillary clinton's speech on criminal justice reform interrupted by black lives matter. >> black lives matter. >> yes, they do. and i'm going to talk a lot about that in a minute. >> when "all in" starts right now. good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. in the wake of a chaotic third gop debate the candidates are revolting against the party's central institution, the republican national committee. the only thing the different factions of the gop seem to agree on is vilifying the media. almost no one in the republican field was happy with wednesday night's debate, and after ben carson said he was reaching out to the other candidates about reforming debate rules, last night politico posted a big
scoop. since confirmed by nbc news. the campaigns, all of them, are planning to gather in washington on sunday to plot how to change the messy debate process, and quote, "how to remove power from the hands of the republican national committee." nbc's chris jansing reports most of the campaigns have signed on including the bush camp, which had been initially non-committal. while the rnc has made multiple attempts to reach the organizers, chairman reince priebus and his representatives remain uninvited. last night priebus was still trying to contain the debate fallout, blaming host cnbc, our sister network, for how things went. >> obviously, we had assurances it was going to be straight up finance, which is what they do every day. >> let me ask you -- >> just nothing but a crap sandwich. >> in response to the initial criticism of the debate cnbc responded in a statement wednesday, "people who want to be president of the united states should be able to answer tough questions." today, perhaps a signal that he's hearing the candidates' message, priebus went even further, writing a letter to nbc
news chair andy lack, who also oversees msnbc, canceling nbc and telemundo's participation in a debate scheduled for november 16th. "the cnbc network is one of your media properties and its handling of the debate was conducted in bad faith. while debates are meant to include tough questions and contrast candidates' visions and policies for the future of america, cnbc's moderators engaged in a series of gotcha questions, petty and mean-spirited in tone and designed to embarrass our candidates." that republican debate had been the only one set to air on spanish language television. meanwhile, priebus said he still plans to hold the event with the debate's other co-host, the conservative publication "the national review," which was going to do it together with telemundo and nbc. nbc news responded in a statement, "this is a disappointing development. however, along with our debate broadcast partners at telemundo, we will work in good faith to resolve this matter with the republican party." now, railing against the mainstream media has proved to be a major political boon to the candidates.
especially ted cruz, who this week has practically made it his campaign platform. >> the democratic debates are primarily moderated by liberals, and the republican debates are primarily moderated by liberals. on the republican side you look at an awful lot of the media interviewers. their object is whoever the republican nominee is to beat up on them and to have people either stay home or vote for hillary clinton. >> sure. >> after cruz's big moment slamming the moderators wednesday night, 24% of republican-leaning respondents to an online poll said he'd done the best job in the debate. the day after cruz told fox news his campaign managed to raise $1.1 million. joining me now, "washington post" political reporter phillip bump and alex eisenstadt, political reporter for politico. alex, let's talk about this meeting, how it came to be and what the intention here is. >> well, look, the intention here is that candidates sort of want to take power out of the hands of the republican national committee, which has been really
taking the lead in negotiating the terms of the debates. so they're going to be getting together a number of campaigns together on sunday night and talking about what they warrant for debates in the future. and they all agree that this debate we had on wednesday in boulder, colorado was a total mess and they don't want to repeat that again. >> but here's my question for them, right? part of this is there's this backlash against reince appreciateus and it seems like sometimes that's what's driving this. i feel like the frustration toward the last debate in some ways was building over three debates, it's the culmination of a lot of frustration, it's the culmination of a lot of frustrations at reince priebus himself. is that a fair assessment? >> it is a fair assessment. and understand why that's happening. it's because the rnc this cycle really took it upon themselves to take greater control over this process. you'll remember four years ago when there were about two dozen republican debates and they were just as much of a mess. afterward the party decided they wanted to have greater control,
wanted to clean it up a little bit. but look, it's just as much of a mess as ever and now you have a tremendous backlash. the rnc is under a massive amount of pressure right now. >> let me play reince priebus basically promising it that things are going to be better this time. this is him february 2nd. take a listen. >> i am against a process that can turn into a circus, which is what i'm trying to prevent. so i'm trying to in a reasonable way, allowing for debate, allowing for people to get involved but also not allow for 23 debates and a six-month out-of-control primary process from taking place. so i'm trying to find that happy medium, steve. >> it strikes me that reince is in a position similar to john boehner, which is the center of gravity for the institutional republican party is just becoming completely unmoored and there's very little he can do about p it. >> right. if you look at who started putting together this thing, it was people who weren't long-standing members of the republican party and the republican establishment. absolutely part of this is that
the candidates who are on stage want to demonstrate they're independent of the republican party, they're independent of the news media. if you look at what happened in 2012, we all remember when newt gingrich challenged cnn, got huge applause. like that sort of thing is very memorable. and ted cruz is very aware when he was dodging the questions actually posed to him and instead attack the media that thou b beneficial. >> well, and it also strikes me that if you ask reinced reince priebus eight months ago, ten months ago, do you think ben karson and donald trum rp going to be the front-runners in the primary, calling the shots essentially, and running an end-around around your authority over the debate process he would have said you're out of your mind. >> well, i think that if you had tried to predict anything that happened in republican politics in the course of the last 12 months, maybe since the night eric cantor lost, it would have been almost impossible to do so. the extent to which the rnc has lost control over republicans is hard to emphasize. >> and this gets me back, alex. i feel like obviously we're in a sort of conflicted position because cnbc is a sort of partner to msnbc and i'm not going to opine one way or the
other about the journalism because it's just not credible in either direction. but what i will say, however, is it does seem to me that there's a little bit of scapegoating. i mean, look, the republican primary has more candidates than anyone ever before. there are ten people on that stage, which is kind of tough to manage, and two people who've never had elected office have been dominating the policy for three months. a billionaire real estate mogul who says outrageous things, former reality star, and a neuroscientist who has no political experience whatsoever. that's not anyone's fault. that is the state of play in the republican race. >> no, that's true. and i can guarantee you that when the rnc took control of this process they weren't betting that there would be about 16 different candidates in this race and that donald trump would be leading in the polls and that ben carson would also be leading in the polls. that wasn't what they were thinking. so this race has taken on a very rambunctious tone. the rnc didn't know that when they signed up for this. >> there's an item in politico that said during the debate that
two dnc people came in to complain about jeb bush not getting enough time. sean spicer who was named there later said it was for a number of candidates not getting enough time. but the cnbc employee who was involved said the only candidate they heard about was jeb bush. which if that's true and you're another candidate i would hit the roof on that. >> yeah, absolutely. there's not much secret that the republican establishment was hoping jeb bush would be able to carry the ball across the finish line to some extent, obviously not all the of them. but putting your hand on the scale like that doesn't help the rnc's case. >> right. >> the night before the debate everyone was mad about at the rnc because of the green rooms. then they were mad at the rnc over how the debate -- and reince priebus is trying to figure out how to regain control. and i can say it i don't work for nbc, part of what he did is say oh, no, i'm on your side when he had a tough week in proving that. >> phillip bump, alex izzen staat, thank you both. captain, i thought you had a
good piece about this where you said republicans are right, we're terrible, not for the reasons they say. and part of it was about what these debates have been more broadly. what's your beef? >> i think the candidates have learned from previous experiences both at the debates and other coverage, what scores them points, what gets them more air time, what dominates the news cycle. and they've learned and they've acted on it. and one of those things, you know, is just talk over your time limit. right? that was part of the reason why the debate was so chaotic because they had learned from previous debates that they should just keep talking, they'll get more air time. which is kind of an annoying thing. but more substantively they learned that if they lie but they lie confidently maybe they'll get fact checked later but if in the interim the pundits are like good job, that was so confident. >> or that 24 million people see the lie and 1 million people see the fact check you're still up net net. >> it seems pedantic in the end, it seems nitpicky. so it's really about how great can i craft my performance, whether or not it's tethered to
the truth. >> and look, i think part of the core issue here and part of the frustration everyone's feeling is that when you look at the minutes that people got, right? you're watching these long big things. people were getting four minutes of speaking time, six minutes of speaking time. at the top is seven minutes, right? there is no solution to producing a ten-person debate. none. like if someone came to me and my producer said we've got a great idea for tonight's show -- >> book ten people. >> we're going to book ten guests at the same time. and you you just sort of -- i'd be like no, that's going to be bad television and nothing will ever get resolved or said because there's ten people. but that's what -- i mean -- >> i know. >> so that's no one's fault. and i understand if i were participating in that as a candidate i would find it massively frustrating. >> and i also wonder when i was talking about how they've been strategic about crafting their strategy from one debate to the next, in previous debates the way that your opponent got to talk was that you attacked them. right? so i do wonder if part of the reason why you saw candidates not attacking their competition this time around --
>> because that gave time to theperson being attacked. >> more air time. >> but then you need something to attack. >> but you know, he's not as much of a threat to donald trump. i think what happens is the candidates have to figure out how can i get as much air time as possible, how can i get as little -- give as little air time as possible to my greatest threats, and you have this sort of finagling for what eventually in the end is like three minutes of speaking time. and it just is not the most -- it's not the format that's the most conducive to a substantive informed conversation. >> it's funny because it's a situation that i think a lot of people feel that way. the candidates clearly feel that way. i think people -- critics across all three debates sometimes maybe feel that way although there are certain exchanges that have been very illuminating but they've also been -- all three are basically breaking records for ratings. that's the other part of it, is that yeah, it might be that there's some tension between what will be the most dynamic
television and what serves -- >> democracy? >> that's right. the best. it's possible there's a tension between those two things. >> who would have guessed? >> i mean, i've never guessed. >> yeah. it's never wrestled with these problems. it's absolutely an issue. and it does create some perverse incentives if you're a moderator. like you kind of want to create some tension on stage. >> absolutely. >> you want to get them to attack each other. there was more of that i think in previous debates than in this debate. partly, again, because i think that if you attack your opponent they're going to get to talk. >> that's a great point. i had not thought of that. >> but i do think if you're a moderator you kind of want to ask these provocative questions that are going to produce the greatest drama. >> and also look, at each subsequent debate there's a premium on novelty. you're trying to find in debate 3 and 4 and 5 and 6 and 7 you as a moderator are trying to find questions that haven't been asked before. all this sort of low-hanging fruit gets taken. that's how you end up in places that i think maybe the
candidates feel are esoteric. but to me whatever the rules are, whatever the rnc comes up with, ten people on stage is going to be kind of a mess no matter what. >> especially if they've learned they shouldn't answer the question, if it's a difficult question they don't want to answer just bash the media and say liberal bias, not worth my talking about the debt ceiling or whatever. so even if they ask substantive questions -- >> doesn't mean you're going to get an answer. >> exactly. >> catherine rampell, thank you very much. still to come as jeb bush's campaign trains its focus on marco rubio, it's easy to forget they were once very close allies. we'll look at the latest attacks. plus our second "all in" candidate book report. this week it's mike huckabee's latest work titled "god, guns, grits, and gravy." which sounds almost delicious. and later, how hillary clinton handled a black lives matter protest during her speech on criminal justice reform. those stories and more ahead.
so what's your news? i got a job! i'll be programming at ge. oh i got a job too, at zazzies. (friends gasp) the app where you put fruit hats on animals? i love that! guys, i'll be writing code that helps machines communicate. (interrupting) i just zazzied you. (phone vibrates) look at it! (friends giggle) i can do dogs, hamsters, guinea pigs... you name it. i'm going to transform the way the world works. (proudly) i programmed that hat. and i can do casaba melons. i'll be helping turbines power cities. i put a turbine on a cat. (friends ooh and ahh) i can make hospitals run more efficiently... this isn't a competition!
presidential campaign. he is having a great time. >> are you having fun running for president? >> yeah, i am. i'm having a blast. and i'm getting my views validated and challenged at the same time. it's a phenomenal way to grow intellectually, spiritually. physically i'm in phenomenal shape for an old 62-year-old guy. in fact, i think we ought to have five-hour debates. >> what do you make of the headlines that say your campaign is on life support? >> it's not on life support. we have the most money. we have the greatest organization. we're doing fine. >> end is not near. memo to file. >> you said on a conference call that you're going to get better at this. what are you going to do to get better at this? >> look, we've got eight more debates. i'm going to have to do what other candidates do, which is rudely interrupt, not answer the questions that are asked, and hopefully the debate moderators will actually ask more substantive questions as well. it's going fine. >> are you having any fun? >> oh, yeah. you saw it. having lots of fun.
when marco rubio was elected speaker of the florida haas back in 2005 then florida governor jeb bush presented rubio with a sword bush claimed he had long relied orrin which bush called the sword of kang. >> i'm going to bestow on you the sword of a great conservative warrior and i know chang won't let you down and you won't let him down.
>> with rubio now having surpassed bush in the race for the gop presidential nomination, bush's bequeathing of that sword to his one-time protege has started to look pretty prescient. it is hard to overstate how close these two men once were. they first met 15 years ago and quickly became close allies who reportedly regularly consulted each other in late-night phone calls. a relationships friends have described as being almost family. in a 2012 tribute to bush, now senator rubio said, "often in the senate when faced with a tough choice i would ask myself, wwjd. what would jeb do?" but as rubio's demolition of bush in wednesday's gop debate made clear, the relationship has morphed into an increasingly bitter rivalry with all the markings of a shakespearean drama. last night u.s. news published a leaked 112-page internal bush campaign memo that is starkly critical of rubio. one slide titled "marco is a risky bet." bullet-points rubio's "misuse of state party credit cards, taxpayer funds and ties to scandal-tarred former
congressman david rivera." the memo then goes through other alleged rubio dirty laundry before concluding cryptically, those who have looked into marco's background in the past have been concerned with what they have found. a bush aide told "u.s. news" that was a reference to rubio being vetted for vice president by mitt romney's team in 2012 but long-time top romney aide beth meyers pushed back telling politico that "senator rubio passed our vetting. we found nothing that disqualified him from serving as vp." meanwhile, bush's campaign manager, danny diaz, has reportedly bragged about the size of their operation research file on senator rubio and said they were prepared to begin a full-scale attack. the bush campaign isn't the only one going to war. while rubio has been relatively restrained in his public comments about bush, the super pac backing him which just unveiled this, its first campaign ad, today found a memo that includes this remarkably cutting line, "when you consider all angles as we do, we believe there are really only four candidates with a reasonable chance of becoming the republican nominee.
senator marco rubio, dr. ben carson, donald trump, and senator ted cruz." you probably noticed that a certain former florida governor was not among the names listed there. as for bush, seen here underneath a "jeb can fix it" sign, he has spent the last 48 hours in damage control mode following his widely panned debate performance. a national nbc news online poll conducted by survey monkey out today found that 38% of republican-leaning voters felt that bush did the worst job in the debate. no other candidate was even in the double digits. bush's campaign last week said it was slark payroll by 40%. today brought yet another dire sign. the campaign's chief operating officer, long-time bush family ally christine ciccone, lost her job for which she was reportedly being paid $12,000 per month. bush is trying to reboot. his campaign is billing a month monday speech in tampa at major event in which bush will be sharper than ever and his cash-flush super pac is planning an $11 million ad blitz starting in january. joining me now former republican
congressman trey radle of florida and republican media consultant rick wilson, founder of intrepid media. trey, give us a little background on this relationship. i know you know both these gentlemen. it was a kind of defining relationship in florida politics for years there while marco rubio was in the legislature and jeb bush was in the state house. >> sure. and shortly after that rubio wrote a book. governor bush also wrote a forward to it. they are very close. they are colleagues. they share a lot of the same views. but is it really like obi wan or yoda to luke skywalker? i don't know if it's that much. i think the word protege has been used a little too much. i think that marco rubio -- i think it's more like dr. dre to snoop dogg, if you will. marco rubio is his own man. yes, jeb has helped him throughout his career tremendously, has given him a certain platform and stature, but marco rubio is his own man. i met marco rubio back in 2009. i was a political reporter here in southwest florida.
marco at the time was running for the u.s. senate against charlie crist. at the time governor crist had the highest approval ratings in the united states of america. at that time marco could not get ten people to sit down with him at a lunch. and now where are we today? marco's running for president after being in the u.s. senate. and charlie crist is running as a democrat for the united states congress. marco rubio has some serious political chops, and he's shown us that through most especially this last debate. >> rick, you had this tweet that a lot of people pointed to, this is right before the debate, says the following, "man, oh man, the dumb replanned move a certain campaign is about to make in the big debate is campaign-ending stupid." a lot of people thought this was jeb bush turning toward marco rubio, attacking him on this vote, referencing the french work week, mischaracterizing the french work week, i will also add. is that what you were referring to? >> it was. it was. and look, that was a moment i think that governor bush didn't
meet the standards he tends to set for himself in terms of carrying an attack that's substantive and real because you could see that he was uncomfortable with it from the very beginning. you could see that he was grinding it out. and the fact of the matter is the rumor mill had pushed that out so far and so widely there was no scenario under which marco rubio wasn't ready to snatch that thing out of the air no matter what the variation of the attack was, he was going to take that and smash it. and i think it really blew back on the governor. and i think he would have been better off, frankly -- you know, jeb bush's folks are telling him his target is marco rubio, and he couldn't be more wrong. if jeb bush wants to solidify his donors and the folks who support him in the establishment side of his party, then he's got to prove he can take out donald trump. it's not marco. that to me is a fundamental strategic distraction for him. and i think the fact that it's against a guy who is wildly
popular in florida, wildly popular in the field right now, a rising star in this thing, really it contradicts sort of basic political gut logic. you go after the guy that's going to make something for you. you knock down donald trump a few notches and you're something. you knock down marco and it doesn't yield you a lot if you're jeb bush. >> well, it also, trey, brings it mind, there's an old adage that when the stakes get low the politics get very, very petty, very vicious. and there's a corollary in politics which is when two people don't have a lot of substantive differences, right? when they're running on very -- when they don't have things they can point to and say you voted for this and i'm against that and you want this war and i don't want that war. then all that's left is personal. the differentiation process is almost predetermined to get pretty personal when you have jeb bush and marco rubio who there's not a ton of political daylight between them. >> i agree. and quite frankly i disagree with some of their stances on
things. i think that both jeb bush and marco rubio see themselves as be being in this for a marathon. i think they believe that people like donald trump and ben carson, who rick just mentioned, i think they see those as -- and i hate to say this, everybody said about trump he's a flash in the pan. i don't think those two think they're in it for the long haul even though trump has done what he's done. but let's go back to a few things. when we see that here's what i definitively know in politics. i've been through quite a bit both professionally and having been through a campaign. if you are being attacks, you are winning. if you are explaining, you are losing. and right now as this cycle stands, right now marco rubio even though he's down in the polls, he's winning pretty big and jeb is losing because he's having to explain himself. >> that's the key. the poll we had out today had marco rubio at nine points.
it's not clear to me the voters in the base of the republican party were as impressed by marco rubio as the kind of pundit and donor class seem to be. what do you think? >> the donor class damage that that mistake made to governor bush in the debate is still being tallied. i mean, just tonight maggie abraham of the "new york times" broke that paul singer has decided to back marco. and the donor class movement toward marco right now, because they recognize that ben carson is a wonderful man but fundamentally unprepared to be president in every possible axis and donald trump is quite frankly bordering on delusional that he's going to be president, he may be ahead in the polls but the republican establishment, the donor class, and frankly mainstream republican voters, 75% of them don't want donald trump as president. so they're looking at marco rubio across the board, from various conservative folks to moderate vokes to establish -- whatever the demo is, they're look at marco now not just as the guy who can be the nominee but as the guy who's going to be the best positioned to beat hillary clinton. >> trey radel, rick wilson,
thank you gentlemen both. appreciate it. up next our second "all in" book report. this week mike huckabee's book which asks "have i been taken to a different planet than the one on which i grew up?" we'll try o'answer that next. ce before it's first oil change?" you ask. maybe the better question is, why do you have that insurance company? with liberty mutual new car replacement, we'll replace the full value of your car. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. romantic moments can happen spontaneously, so why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions
and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. why pause the moment? ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. for a free 30-tablet trial go to cialis.com (vo) you can check on them. you can worry about them. you can even choose a car for them. (mom) honey, are you ok? (child) i'm ok. (announcer vo) love. (mom) we're ok.
(announcer vo) it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. help individualize our cancer treatment? now through advanced genomic testing, we may be able to pinpoint and diagnose what makes your cancer different, which can reveal precise treatment options that were not considered previously. with this important breakthrough at the intersection of science and technology, we've arrived at precision cancer treatment. the evolution of cancer care is here at cancer treatment centers of america. call or visit cancercenter.com to learn more about precision cancer treatment.
as a preacher as well as a politician you know that presidents need the moral authority to bring the entire country together. the leading republican candidate, when you look at the average of national polls right now, is donald trump. when you look at him, do you see someone with the moral authority to unite the country?
>> you know, as few questions i've got, the last one i need is to give him some more time. i love donald trump. he is a good man. i'm wearing a trump tie tonight. get over that one. okay? >> governor mike huckabee, who's currently polling around 3 1/2% in the republican presidential primary, only got to talk for about seven minutes during wednesday night's debate. fortunately, he laid out his thoughts earlier this year in the tome "god, guns, grits and gravy" and "guardian" and "rolling stone" columnist jeb lund just read it for us. >> noerz of us from the land of god, guns, grits and gravy being told you need to ride a bicycle and live any tree stump by -- who hasn't been outside the san francisco city limits since jerry garcia died goes over there as well as pee-wee herman lecturing george foreman on how to throw a punch.
>> i hate this. >> i'm alife member of ducks unlimited, a life member of bass angler sportsman society, a member of the wild turkey federation. in fact maybe i should add another g to god, guns, grits and gravy, game. because god gives us game that we shoot with guns and serve with grits and gravy. good. there are so many straw men in this book that i was afraid to read it near an open flame. huckabee explains a war on christians by citing protests against chick-fil-a and claiming they were inspired by the company owner's comments on a radio show to make liberals look easily outraged. it would be a good point were it not for the company's history of donate's to anti-marriage equality groups and being sued for workplace discrimination. give huckabee some credit. he's fluent in pop culture in a way that most conservatives aren't, and he effortlessly drops references throughout the book. but if you're a woman pop cultural figure you only show up here to be shamed as a fallen woman. rihanna, miley cyrus, beyonce, they're only cited as part of a culture of dehumanization.
and then he goes on to say that a culture of dehumanization is what led to the holocaust. so we're going to have to update the martin muller quote, "first they came for destiny's child, and i only did twerking." this book is pretty good. huckabee spins a good yarn the way any charismatic preacher should, and there are some genuine laugh out loud moments. as a campaign book it's probably a 4 out of 5. as a real book that you would read for normal reasons it's a 3 out of 10. please, don't read the book. >> next week, "guardian" and "rolling stone" columnist jeb lund will be reviewing a brand new book for us, the much-anticipated "crippled america: how to make america great again," by donald j. trump. with no ghost writer, i'm sure. i'm sure he just wrote this in the last few months. it hits book store shelves on tuesday. i cannot wait. is biotene, specially formulated with moisturizers and lubricants.
biotene can provide soothing relief and it helps keep your mouth healthy too. biotene, for people who suffer from a dry mouth. the way i see it, you have two choices; the easy way or the hard way. you could choose a card that limits where you earn bonus cash back. or, you could make things easier on yourself. that's right, the quicksilver card from capital one. with quicksilver you earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase, everywhere. so, let's try this again. what's in your wallet? and i'm still struggling with my diabetes. i do my best to manage. but it's hard to keep up with it. your body and your diabetes change over time. your treatment plan may too. know your options. once-daily toujeo® is a long-acting insulin from the makers of lantus®.
it releases slowly to provide consistent insulin levels for a full 24 hours. toujeo® also provides proven full 24-hour blood sugar control and significant a1c reduction. toujeo® is a long-acting, man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. allergic reaction may occur and may be life threatening. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens, even if the needle has been changed. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be serious and life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily while using toujeo®. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose or type of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor if you take other medicines and about all your medical conditions. insulins, including toujeo®, in combination with tzds (thiazolidinediones) may cause serious side effects like heart failure that can lead to death,
even if you've never had heart failure before. don't dilute or mix toujeo® with other insulins or solutions as it may not work as intended and you may lose blood sugar control, which could be serious. ask your doctor about toujeo®. ♪jake reese, "day to feel alive"♪ ♪jake reese, "day to feel alive"♪ ♪jake reese, "day to feel alive"♪ a major escalation announced today in what had previously been a u.s. air campaign against isis in syria.
that effort will now involve u.s. troops on the ground engaged in combat. american special operations forces numbering fewer than 50, according to the white house, will deploy in the kurdish-controlled area of syria to help fight isis. secretary of state john kerry spoke of the change in strategy today in vienna. >> we authorized a small complement of u.s. special operations forces to deploy to northern syria, where they will help to coordinate local ground forces and coalition efforts in order to counter daesh. >> daesh is the acronym of the arabic word for isis. today's announcement comes just over a week after army master sergeant josh-wheeler was killed in combat during a raid to free isis prisoners in iraq, a country in which the u.s. supposedly no longer had a combat role. the announcement arises after repeated assurances by president obama that the u.s. strategy against isis would not involve boots on the ground in syria. >> i will not put american boots
on the ground in syria. i will not pursue an open-ended action like iraq or afghanistan. i will not pursue a prolonged air campaign like libya or kosovo. >> the whus is insisting today as nounsment represents an intensification in strategy, not a change, while also acknowledging the risk. >> the mission the commander in chief has given our military personnel in iraq and now in syria is a train, advise and assist mission. and we have gone to great lengths to make clear that that in no way diminishes the amount of risk that our men and women in uniform will be facing. >> whatever the semantic distinctions, the intensification looks like part of an inevitable projection toward greater u.s. military involvement in the syrian civil war. joining me now, ron wolf, professor of history ufrpt of michigan and author of "the new arabs: how the millennial generation is changing the middle east." you've been critical of u.s.
intervention. you've advocated for intervention in the case of libya. what do you make of today's announcement? >> well, i think today's announcement is probably an acknowledgment of something that's been going on for a little while. the u.s. has hooked one a leftist kurdish militia in northeast syria which has been the best syrian actor for fighting isil. and since obama's emphasis is on defeating isil, perhaps depriving it of its capital in syria at raqqa, it is the kurds with which the u.s. is partnering. >> the kurds have been probably the most effective if not one of the most effective forces in fighting isis. they won a very brutal battle at kobani near the turkish border. of course what complicates this is that turkey, a nato country, absolutely hates that group, is scared of them, has been trying to bomb them at times. so what does that do to that relationship?
>> well, turkey says it bombed the syrian kurds on friday. and i don't know. it's possible that one of the reasons this announcement has been made is to signal to the turks publicly that if they bomb the syrian kurds they're in danger of bombing u.s. troops because they're embedded now, and to -- hands off. but this is a big fight, as you say, between the u.s. and turkey. >> this is a really good point. it leads me to something i've been thinking about. i listen to this podcast hardcore history by dan carlin. he's got this epic about world war i. i have to say listening to it and reading the news out of syria you start to wonder are we going to end up in a situation where one country -- all these countries are involved via proxies, russia's bombing, turkey's bombing, the u.s. is bombing, iran is on the ground, different people on the ground. you're going to end up in a situation where i don't know, russia accidentally bombs a u.s. special operations commando. i mean, what are we headed
toward here? >> you know, that is not completely impossible but it's a little unlikely because you have to think about the syrian civil war as having theaters. so there's a northeast theater that's mainly kurdish and isil. and then there's a northwest theater that's mainly now russia and al qaeda. so each of these areas is a place where there's a concentration on a particular enemy. syria, as you said, is very complex. it's not like a football game where there's two sides. it's more like a poker game where there are like five, you know, plays and each of them is trying to win. >> and in the middle just tremendous and unceasing carnage, misery and horror for the people of syria, the blameless people of syria, who are knocking at the door of the european countries as they try to flee. juan cole, thank you very much for your time. >> thank you. coming up, hillary clinton's rally on criminal justice reform
is interrupted by a black lives matter protest. her reaction, ahead. and everywhere i look... i'm reminded to stick to my plan. including preservision areds 2. my doctor said preservision areds 2 has the exact nutrient formula that the national eye institute recommends to help reduce the risk of progression of moderate to advanced amd... after 15 years of clinical studies. preservision areds 2. because my eyes are everything. more "sit" per roll. more "stay" per roll. more "who's training who" per roll. bounty is two times more absorbent. so one roll of bounty can last longer than those bargain brands. so you get more "life" per roll. bounty. the long-lasting quicker picker upper.
has got some time on his hands, turned her into el nino with lightning and a pump connected to a water battle in her backpack to make it rain. shaming all the other zads odad think might add. let's hope your halloween is safe, fun, and less rainy than zoe's. and don't important our important annual halloween announcement. never, ever wear blackface ever.
starting today over the next several days about 6,000 people will be released from federal prison as part of an effort to reduce their sentences for drug crimes. officials say it is the largest one-time release of federal prisoners in u.s. history. this is happening because last year the u.s. sentencing commission decided to reduce the sentences of drug offenders in an effort to reduce overcrowding. and congress did not object to the commission's decision. this federal prisoner release comes amidst a rhetorical push by president obama for criminal justice reform. this year the president commuted the sentences of 46 non-violent drug offenders and became the first sitting president to visit
a federal prison. speaking with inmates in oklahoma about reforming the system. now, the administration's push seems to be in line with what is widely seen as a growing bipartisan campaign for criminal justice reforms. early this month a group of democratic and republican senators introduced what republican chuck grassley hailed as the biggest criminal justice reform in our generation. but if anyone thinks these reforms won't be fodder for political opportunism and fear mongering i give you the louisiana governor's race where republican senator david vitter is casting his democratic rival john bel edwards as soft on crime. >> photoing for edwards is like voting to make obama louisiana's next governor. want proof? he calls for releasing 6,000 criminals from jail. edwards joined obama promising he'll release 6,500 in louisiana alone. 5,500 dangerous thugs, drug dealers, back into our neighborhoods. edwards even voted to allow convicts to receive
taxpayer-funded pensions. obama and edwards. wrong for louisiana. >> new orleans branch of the naacp is calling for vitter to take down that ad saying it seeks to strike fear in the hearts of the white community. vitter's ad is the first we've seen seeking to exploit the recent sentencing reforms for political gain. now, today hillary clinton speaking in atlanta got a taste of the pressure on the other side of the criminal justice debate. new pressure. and we will show you what that looks like next. your credit is in pretty good shape. chuck, i know i have a 798 fico score, thanks to experian.com. kaboom... get your credit swagger on. go to experian.com.
become a member of experian credit tracker and take charge of your score. get fast-acting, long-lasting relief from heartburn with it neutralizes stomach acid and is the only product that forms a protective barrier that helps keep stomach acid in the stomach where it belongs. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. try gaviscon®. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. oh no... (under his breath) hey man! hey peter. (unenthusiastic) oh... ha ha ha! joanne? is that you?
it's me... you don't look a day over 70. am i right? jingle jingle. if you're peter pan, you stay young forever. it's what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. ♪ you make me feel so young... it's what you do. ♪ you make me feel ♪ so spring has sprung. we heard you got a job as a developer!!!!! its official, i work for ge!! what? wow... yeah! okay... guys, i'll be writing a new language for machines so planes, trains, even hospitals can work better. oh! sorry, i was trying to put it away... got it on the cake. so you're going to work on a train? not on a train...on "trains"! you're not gonna develop stuff anymore? no i am... do you know what ge is? when a moment spontaneously turns romantic, why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use, is the only daily tablet
approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. insurance coverage has expanded nationally and you may now be covered. contact your health plan for the latest information.
using non-violence, using the power -- >> black lives matter! >> -- of these feelings that come forward -- and yes, they do. yes, they do. and i'm going to talk a lot about that in a minute. now, my friends, i am going to get to some very important points that actually prove that black lives do matter and we have to take action together. >> during her speech on criminal justice this afternoon at clark atlanta university, a historically black college in georgia, hillary clinton was interrupted by black lives matter protesters singing and chanting for at least ten minutes. the crowd eventually countered with chants of hillary and let her speak and atlanta mayor kassim reed and congressman john lewis, himself no stranger to protest, trying to talk over the protesters. >> well -- [ crowd chanting
"hillary" ]. thank you very much. i appreciate it. and i appreciate the congressman and the mayor having my back. >> joining me now, wade henderson, president and ceo of the leadership conference on civil and human rights. and ben jealous, partner at caper capital and former president and ceo of the naacp. mr. henderson, let me start with you. we've seen a real change in the politics of criminal justice and criminal justice crime and punishment but i think there's a real question about how deep this goes and where the pressures are. what is your judgment of where we are? >> well, there is a question, chris. but let me say i'm really pleased to see democrats leading on this important issue. i mean, this is the first time that we've seen democratic presidential candidates not afraid of their shadow when it comes to criminal justice policy. i think it's attributable in part to the black lives matter movement. i think it's also attributable to a surprising convergence between left and right
ideologies on crime. and lastly, i think it's a reflection of the severity of the problem in prison with mass incarceration and overcrowding. now, the question of how deep this commitment goes, it remains to be seen and tested. but i think it's important that we are having the conversation, and i do think it's important that steps are being taken like that today as a result of the sentencing commission having reduced sentences, people being released. my one concern about the 6,000 who are not being released is that they are not prepared to in most instances address the revolving door reincarceration and i think without preparation, given the fact that they can't get employment in most instances, can't get student loans, and often don't get housing, that these individuals really will face obstacles that no one individual can be expected to overcome. >> and ben, that speaks to i think part of the issue here, right? we've seen a kind of confluence of the rhetoric. we've seen the politics align a different way. we've seen a situation where because of groups like black lives matter there's pressure on
the other side, which there wasn't for a long time, at least not of the kind there is now. but this question of how deep it goes, you know, are we actually going to commit to making a world in which those 6,000 folks getting out of prison have something to do? >> you know, look, this all comes down to trust. the issue is i think people suspect -- people know she was against, for instance, retroactivity before she was for it but essentially she was -- she was for it before she was against it. and the fear with moderates is that quite frankly they tend to follow their opponents. so right now, yes, the republican party generally has been pretty good but what happens if they shift right? will she also shift right? and that really is the concern, can we trust her? >> mr. anderson, i'm hearing a lot of that from criminal justice reformers. and not just hillary clinton, bernie sanders and martin o'malley as well. but very focused on hillary
clinton. there's a long marshall project sort of chronicling of her record on criminal justice, they've gone back and forth. how important is trust and how important is -- it doesn't matter as long as the politics continue to be there. >> well, look, i believe in trust but i also believe in verification. trust but verify. i think in this instance it's up to us, the advocacy community, and communities around the country, to insist on getting relief for those who are incarcerated for the reason that it makes no sense to fill up prisons without providing relief for individuals who will eventually be released. so i think it's really up to us to press our political leadership to force the issue and to be aggressive. and i think if we do it in a strategic way the results regardless of who is elected can't be against the kinds of things that we're pushing now. >> you know, ben -- >> you know -- >> please, go ahead. >> quite frankly, that's why the black lives matter movement is so important. because they do sort of unleash
kind of a unpredictable righteous ne righteousness and real force that creates more room for long-standing leaders like wade to really be even more forcible but also create some fear for a politician that if they don't quite frankly have the courage of their convictions that black folks continent just sit quietly by and be betrayed once more and poor people in general. >> mr. henderson, my question to you is do you see this turning around, do you see a backlash coming? here in new york city we've seen some of the old politics of crime and punishment. do you anticipate us seeing that? >> i think we have to anticipate some of that. but i think the current climate of change is really quite powerful. and as ben said, the black lives matter movement is contributing to it, but i also think middle-class americans, regardless of race, recognize
that mass incarceration has cost our country dearly and i think we are prepared to change. >> wade henderson, ben jealous, thank you gentlemen both. that is "all in" for this evening. i want to wish a happy halloween to everyone, particularly those with little kidos out there, and a happy marathon day to those who are running or watching, particularly to kerry fox, "all in" second producer, who will be running for the second time. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> kerry's in the marathon this weekend? >> he is. and he was in last year. and he just sent in you can track -- there's an app now, you can track people to see where they are and cheer them. all very high-tech. very exciting. >> that is stupendous. i will never, ever do that in my whole life. >> no. i'm going to try to fix a radiator i guess this weekend. >> very good. happy halloween. thanks, chris. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. happy friday. happy forthcoming halloween. you know, i told you something was going to happen. last night. i told you. i told you this was all about to blow up. i didn't know it was going to blow up exactly the way it blew up today.