tv All In With Chris Hayes MSNBC November 12, 2015 5:00pm-6:01pm PST
"all in with chris hayes" starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> believe me when i tell you, that was brutal what they did to those people. >> reporter: donald trump defending the program formerly known as operation wetback, as republicans go to war with themselves over immigration. >> people have to be deported. there is no doubt about it. >> talk is cheap. that you know where someone is based on their actions. plus, the latest turn from ben carson's presidential run. why hillary clinton's ride is beginning to tilt the republican field. what republican candidates don't get about campus politics. >> i think it's disgusting. >> and fact checking myself on t"the daily show" last night. >> that's a strange thing to think about. >> when "all in" starts right now. >> good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. it is the republican political class' worst nightmare.
immigration, the one issue that could both tear the party apart and doom it in a general election has exploded back into the center of the republican political conversation, with donald trump holding down the most extreme position and everyone else scrambling to try to get some cover. these are live pictures from a, i have to say, relatively low-energy donald trump, addressing supporters at iowa central community college. republican front-runner once again defending the harsh immigration plan he endorsed at tuesday's debate, when he hailed the 1954 program under president dwight eisenhower to deport hundreds of thousands of mexicans living in the u.s. but trump didn't mention that that program was known as operation wetback, named after disparaging term for mexicans who came to the u.s. via the rio grande. last night on fox news, bill o'reilly said operation wetback was a brutal, inhumane program and not something to aspire to. >> believe me when i tell you, mr. trump, that was brutal what they did to those people to kick
them back. i mean, the stuff they did was really brutal and it could never happen today. >> i've heard it both ways. we would do it in a very humane way. >> trump's position is so extreme that it is the rare issue to bring together bill o'reilly and president obama, who today in an interview with abc news, took trump very much to task. >> imagine the images on the screen flashed around the world as we were dragging parents away from their children and putting them in what detention centers and then systemically sending them out. nobody thinks that that is realistic, but more importantly, that's not who we are as americans. >> after their loss in the 2012 election, the gop released an autopsy report that included a frank assessment of how the party is seen by latino voters. only 27% of whom supported mitt romney. quote, if hispanics think we do not want them here, they will close their ears to our
policies, before adding, we must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform. or as republican strategist steve schmidt puts it -- >> it is impossible for us to put together a coalition to win the presidency with less than about 40% of the hispanic vote. >> donald trump is far from the gop's only problem in this regard. today, marco rubio and ted cruz were polling in third and fourth place for the race for the gop nomination, and who many see as currently the two candidates most likely to emerge as the nominee, became engaged in a bitter immigration battle of their own. rubio was a member of the so-called gang of eight that crafted and advocated for the 2013 comprehensive immigration reform bill, that included a path to citizenship. that got 68 votes in the senate before being blocked in the house. under fire from immigration hardliners and the gop, rubio has since repudiated that bill. but cruz isn't about to let anyone forget rubio's involvement. >> talk is cheap. that you know where someone is
based on their actions. as the scripture says, you shall know them by their fruits. the gang of eight, they fought tooth and nail to try to jam this amnesty down the american people's throat. >> rubio had an attack of his own ready today, pointing out that cruz had also once supported a position dangerously close to a conservative to derisively call amnesty. >> when a senate bill was proposed, he proposed legal izing people that were here illegally. he proposed giving them work permits. if you look at it, i don't think our positions are dramatically different. >> rubio's campaign also circulated a video of cruz in 2013, pushing an amendment that would have eliminated the path to citizenship but would have allowed a legal status for undocumented immigrants. >> i don't want immigration reform to fail. i want immigration reform to pass. and so i would urge people of good faith on both sides of the
aisle, if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration, and that allows those who are here illegally to come in and out of the shadows, then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromise to come together. >> now, the fact that ted cruz is now seen by some as insufficiently hardline is a testament to just how far right the immigration debate in the republican party has shifted. when cruz was proposing legal status, his position was the right-wing alternative to the path to citizenship being pushed by rubio. but now, with donald trump advocating mass deportation, modeled on a program called operation wetback, ted cruz's past position puts him on the left flank of the gop conversation. and there is no easy way out of this. according to a new poll, gop and independents overwhelmingly see trump as the candidate who would
best handle the issue of immigration. now, editor in chief of "reason" magazine, that gives you heartburn if you are karl rove or a top republican strategist. that last chart we saw, overwhelmingly, this is what republican voters want to hear on this issue. >> well, that chart is about, what do people who think they're going to do best on immigration, right? so the people who are motivated by either being more restrictionist with immigration or really mad at illegal immigrants, or, this is also important, they really think that the elites are full of it when they talk about wants to have immigration reform. they're reflected in that number. they want donald trump who's going to deport the 5 million children or 4 million children of illegal immigrants. but marco rubio is in second place. so there is an alternative there for people who think all that kind of stuff is crazy. so, yes, that 49 number is gigantic and it gives those people heartburn. and there's legitimate worry that the party is going to shoot itself in the foot in the some way.
and donald trump agreed with that hispanic report after the election. he called mitt romney's self-deportation line maniacal in september of 2012. a lot of people have changed their mind. >> i'm going to give you my read on what i would do if i were marco rubio. if i was marco rubio's adviser, and i was totally amoral, i would just say, look, just lie to people. i mean, lie yourself through the primary. say, yeah, we're not going to -- we're going to deal with this, we're going to take path to citizenship off the table. we're not going to do path to citizenship when i'm president. we can maybe talk about legal status, you know, kick the ball down the field. if you get the nomination, those people will vote for you anyway. and pivot, and i actually think, perversely, you can make an argument, the best chance for comprehensive immigration reform would essentially be a republican punking his own base on the issue. >> i think that he's actually doning it correctly right now. which is similar to what john mccain did back in 2007. remember, his campaign was almost torpedoed by hostility
towards his work on a comprehensive immigration campaign. >> yep, kennedy. >> which he then disavowed and started running and voting against the individual parts of it. what rubio is saying, and i think there's some truth to this, that comprehensive immigration reform is actually at this point actually a bad idea. i agree with him on that. i think you have to de-comprehensivefy it. you have to say, i think the problem is we have insufficient number of legal pieces, and it's a two-bureaucratic system. make that number bigger, and suddenly treat it as a prohibition problem rather than treating it as a criminality problem, and you can flip it. but i think rubio has played it pretty well so far. the thing is, he's now the front-runner in the betting markets. >> if he can -- look, he got away with the cnbc debate, because somehow he never was prepped on this particular issue, which is the biggest glaring weakness of marco rubio, right? which is at one level, you can say he's achieved the perfect level of strategic ambiguity on
what he can do. on the other, you can say, he's got no cover, because the people who want reform don't trust him and the people who don't want reform don't trust him. >> republicans have wiped out democrats on the state level and governorships, they had a really good last week, all this kind of stuff. and very little of that had anything to do with immigration or immigration reform, right? so this is a presidential year, and let's remember, this is -- one of the craziest political season we've ever seen, ever since donald trump escalatored down into our political lives and said mexicans were rapists. and then immediately doubled in the polls -- >> changed everything. >> speaking of the man running the escalator, trump just gave an interview and had an interesting characterization of ben carson. take a listen. >> when he says he's pathological, and he says that in the book. i don't say that. and again, i don't say anything. i'm not saying anything other than pathological is a very serious disease. and he said he's pathological. that's a big problem. because you don't cure that.
you know, you can say, you don't say, for example, child molester, you don't cure these people. you don't cure a child molester. there's no cure for it. pathological, there's no cure for that. now, i didn't say it. he said it in his book. >> just dropped child molester on the table there. >> this election has said that people who usually get penalized for statements like that haven't been penalized so far, during the low-information season of the republican primary. but at the same juncture before, herman cain was winning, rudy giuliani was winning. eventually, you've got to think maybe you will get penalized for that -- >> that is something we take up later in the show. matt welsh, always good to have you here. joining me now, matt baretto, co-founder of the polling group, a consultant of the hillary clinton campaign, but he's not speaking on behalf of the campaign tonight. matt, here's my question. this seems to be an empirical question. so it could be the case that latino voters are not paying
close attention to the republican primary or if they are, they're forming strong opinions of donald trump, and as long as he's not the nominee, it's not really going to be a big issue in the general. or it could be the case, latino voters are paying close attention and this is hurting the overall republican brand. what what does the evidence suggest about which of those two is correct? >> i think the latter, for sure. there was an nbc telemundo poll out about a month, month and a half ago that said that 16% of the trump comments spoke for the party as a whole and was hurting the overall brand. when we've done polling on that same thing, during the 2013 immigration reform you were talking about, when folks like jeff sessions and ted cruz were giving their anti-immigrant statements, it reflected the whole party. >> you know, i think there's some thinking among some folks in the gop that marco rubio is sort of the perfect emissary for this. his parents are immigrants, he, himself, is latino, he's a fluent speaker of spanish, and
that he can kind of overcome this. even if he's wrong on the substance with regards to the vast majority of latinos, who by very large margin favor comprehensive reform. what do you think of that argument? >> you know, there was some point during 2013, during the immigration reform debate, that marco rubio was saying the right thing. but he has completely shifted from those statements, including most recently being caught on video saying that he would repeal the doca and the dopa, that he would go against these things protecting these dreamers and the parents of u.s.-born kids. he has moved a very long way from where he was in june of 2013 when the u.s. senate was working together. now he is moving farther to the right. that seems to be the trump effect. that trump is moving these candidates further to the right. and even someone like rubio who might have a compelling story is going to have a very, very hard time explaining himself to latino voters on this issue that he has now abandoned. >> but does as a political
reporter, particularly, the word flip-flop exists for a reason. people change positions. it seems to me it's not impossible for someone like him to get the nomination and just say, you know what, it's back on, let's talk about it and have a bit of credibility. say, look, i was a gang of eight guy. i believed in this. now i'm running for president, i think we can make it happen in the right way. let's get this done. >> i think that has all changed now with this sort of age of everything being caught on video. so how is rubio going to respond when he's on camera saying he would repeal and end the doca or the dopa, the executive actions that protect millions of families? so because that's on tape, because it's in his words, because it's he himself, saying this, rubio will have a very, very hard time tacking back. yes, in 2013, he supported the senate bill and he was a co-author of the senate bill. but he backed away from it. he didn't even go to help anyone in the lobby to get a path. he almost immediately backed
away from it. and because this is all on tape, because this is all on video, his own smiling face saying these things to conservative crowds, he'll have a lot of explaining to do. i just don't see right now how he gets back to that center point and convinces latinos that he actually cares about these important issues. >> you anticipate ted cruz to continue to press what i think is probably his advantage on this. >> yeah, absolutely. i think you're going to see cruz really try to lean into him on that issue and really try to expose him and keep using the amnesty word. and i think you'll see a lot of divisiveness. that debate the other night really exposed this big gulf in the republican party. and these numbers you had on earlier, showing this is really driving the republican party right now, and that is terrible. if they're going to look at the mitt romney numbers like that was the good old years, 27%. they're going down on this issue and hispanic voters know where they substantiate. >> matt baretto, thank you very
much. still ahead, why some ben carson stories are concerning, they don't disqualify him from becoming president. later, how republican candidates are recalibrating their attack strategy, now setting their sights on hillary clinton. plus, as we see ripple effects fr the university of missouri, liberals and conservatives both ringing the alarm about the dangers of so-called pc culture, are they missing the point? those stories and more ahead. plp b think my boys have a shot this year. yeah, especially with this new offense we're running... i mean, our running back is a beast. once he hits the hole and breaks through the secondary, oh he's gone. and our linebackers and dbs dish out punishment,
and never quit. ♪ you didn't expect this did you? no i didn't. the nissan altima. there's a fun side to every drive. nissan. innovation that excites. put under a microscope, we can see all the bacteria that still exists. polident's unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day. ♪ ♪
it took the rockettes years to master the kick line. but only a few moves to master paying bills on chase.com technology designed for you. so you can easily master the way you bank. . yesterday ben carson did something you might have missed. he became arguably the most liberal candidate on immigration, specifically on how to address the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants. >> i propose we give them a six-month period in which to register. if they don't register within that six-month period, they're criminals. and i would treat it as such. but if they register within that six-month period and if they
have a pristine record and they wish to be guest workers in this country, they would have to pay a back-tax penalty and continue to pay taxes going forward. but they would no longer have to live in the shadows. >> now, that's not fall short of comprehensive immigration reform. it's on a far-left position, but it was far too much for donald trump who tweeted, quote, wow, presidential candidate ben carson who is very weak on illegal immigration just said he likes amnesty and a pathway to citizenship. coming up, the latest revelation about ben carson's path. that's next. opportunity has no slow season. no off-days, or downtime. opportunity is everything you make of it. this winter, take advantage of our season's best offers on the latest generation of cadillacs. the 2016 cadillac srx. get this low-mileage lease from around $339 per month,
or purchase with 0% apr financing. can a a subconscious. mind? a knack for predicting the future. reflexes faster than the speed of thought. can a business have a spirit? can a business have a soul? can a business be...alive? ben carson, republican front-runner, a claimed neurosurgeon says he has the fix
for health care in this country, something he calls the saudi arabia solution. carson wrote niz 2013 book, "america the beautiful," quote, why don't people steal very much in saudi arabia? obviously because the punishment is the amputation of one or more fingers. i would not advocate chopping off people's limbs, but there would be some very stiff penalties for this kind of fraud, such as loss of one's medical license for life, no less than ten years in prison, and loss of one's personal possessions. but according to the associated press, carson advocated to a different plea earlier. alfonzo costa was accused in 2007 of billings a an insurance company for procedures he never actually performed, a crime that carries up to ten years in prison. but after carson intervened on his behalf, costa, who pled guilty, ended up with no more than three years probation. his dental license was revoked in 2009. in a statement today, ben carson
told nbc news, "al costa is my best friend. al costa is my very best friend. i know his heart. i am proud to call him my friend. i will continue to stand by him and that's what real friends do." who among us don't have an old friend that is a scoundrel. but what could be his lack of command fully on display at tuesday night's debates. >> we're talking about global jihadists and their goal is to destroy us and destroy our way of life. we have to be saying, how do we make them look like losers? because that's the way we're able to gather a lot of influence. and i think in order to make them look like losers, we have to destroy their caliphate. >> the post-debate analysis many people have zeroed in on one particular thing that carson said about the middle east. >> putin is trying to really spread his influence throughout the middle east. this is going to be his base.
and we have to oppose him there, in an effective way. we also must recognize that it's a very complex place. you know, the chinese are there, as well as the russians. >> the chinese are there. okay, to be clear, if china had a military presence in the middle east, in syria, that would be a very, very, very big deal. that would be all over the news. so big it's probably a safe bet that we have never heard about it. but asked about that comment by msnbc's tamron hall, armstrong williams, said carson knows something we just don't know. >> from your perspective, maybe that is inaccurate. but from our intelligence and what dr. carson has been told by people on the ground who are involved in that area of the world, it has been told to him many times over and over that the chinese are there. now, just because the mainstream media and other experts don't want to see any credibility to it, does not mean that some way down the line, within the next
few days, that that story wouldn't come out and be reinforced and given credibility by others. >> in a radio interview yesterday, carson said he wouldn't hesitate to shoot down russian aircraft, no matter the consequences. >> if they do come into that area, after you have given them adequate warning, after we have talked to putin, you shoot 'em down, absolutely. >> all right. there is the whole butterfly effect. if you shoot down a russian mig, what happens next? they will respond, no question. >> whatever happens next, we deal with it. but we can't continue backing down. >> now, carson says he's ready to start another war in iraq. >> i think we require boots on the ground. and the advantage of putting boots on the ground is that you provide leadership. because all of the nations of the arabian peninsula and in that area, they have an interest in that area, but there's nobody leading them. >> joining me now, matt taibbi, contributing editor for "rolling
stone." i mean, this is -- i mean, i guess, look, i guess the idea is, everyone else in the race this is he's going to disappear. i think the gop, kind of donor class, doesn't feel threatened by him. so what's the use in pointing it out? but i don't -- you've been covering -- you've been in iowa. i don't think he's going to disappear. >> i know, i just got back from new hampshire, too. i think it's like mr. welch was saying before. this is a totally new paradigm we have with this presidential election. things that we were disqualifying in previous election cycles aren't disqualifying anymore. people say crazy things. the media points them out, but for some reason it doesn't move voters anymore. people who like carson are sticking with carson and people who like trump, are sticking with trump. it doesn't matter how crazy they are or how little sense they make anymore. >> and i should say, his foreign policy -- i should have -- national security adviser, susan rice, i should play her responding to this china in
syria idea. take a listen. >> i really can't speak to what he was referring to, but, you know, unless you're talking about having a diplomatic presence, i'm not sure what he was referring to. >> -- military involvement --? >> i have not seen any evidence of china's military involvement in syria. >> there's also sort of this amazing echo chamber effect, where armstrong and williams say, we have our own private knowledge. >> right, how do you refute that? >> maybe they do. >> if you're a carson supporter and armstrong williams gets up there and says, we actually think this is true, what is anybody going to say? you know, the chinese aren't there? you can't show every single part of syria, right? >> having been on the trail in new hampshire and iowa, do you feel like you have a better sort of grasp of carson's appeal than you did before you went on the trail? >> i think his primary appeal in this race is that he clearly -- he's the one that evangelical voters identify with the most. and out of all the candidates, he's the one who's most up-front
about his religion. trump is clearly not -- he's clearly not that candidate. and you know, the other candidates are professional politicians, which is also to their detriment. so he's going to get those voters. >> i think he's going to win iowa. >> i think he's going to win iowa. and he's going to stick around. i think everybody is expecting rubio to rise. las vegas thinks he's going to rise. >> you mean the betting market? >> right. they all think he's going to be in it. but i still think he's going to hang around. >> i want to play this. we mentioned this yesterday. i don't think we played this amazing ted cruz moment, where he says that he's going -- the five agencies -- >> oh, yeah? >> -- that he's going to get rid of. let's take a look at ted cruz. >> today, we rolled out a spending plan. $500 billion in specific cuts, five major agencies that i would eliminate. the irs, the department of commerce, the department of energy, uh, the department of commerce, and hud. >> i got nothing? >> it was so funny. >> here's what i love about it.
there's two things i love about it. one is, there's a moment in that where you can see -- a microsecond where he's like, he's forgotten it. and then he makes the absolutely correct choice to just repeat. >> right. >> you could see it in his eyes. i forgot, i'm going to make an affirmative choice to just repeat this and he totally gets away with it. to me, that was the perfect microcosm of ted cruz masterful politician. >> i think what happened was, he sees rick perry -- >> yes! >> -- flashing before his eyes. and everybody was watching that, saw that happen, but he just punched before instead of just stammering in the way that perry did. he actually just, you know, it wasn't that catastrophic. it was bad, but it wasn't awful. >> it wasn't catastrophic, because in the moment no one called him on it. it's a great lesson about politics, people can check the tape later, but that doesn't matter as much as in the moment. >> i still think this would have been really, really bad in another campaign. in this campaign, it's the ultimate internet campaign. you have to keep checking every ten seconds to see what crazy or stupid thing the candidates have
said. people forgot about that five seconds later, because something else crazy happened. >> that's right. that would have been a whole 48-hour cycle, at least. matt taibbi, thanks. >> good to see you. coming up, what some very astute, very astute viewers caught during my appearance on "the daily show" last night. that's next. >> -- you know, someone like donald trump. and to help you accelerate, we've created a new company... one totally focused on what's next for your business. the true partnership where people,technology and ideas push everyone forward. accelerating innovation. accelerating transformation. accelerating next. hewlett packard enterprise. so wi got a job!ews? i'll be programming at ge. oh i got a job too, at zazzies. (friends gasp) the app where you put fruit hats on animals? i love that! guys, i'll be writing code that helps machines communicate. (interrupting) i just zazzied you.
(phone vibrates) look at it! (friends giggle) i can do dogs, hamsters, guinea pigs... you name it. i'm going to transform the way the world works. (proudly) i programmed that hat. and i can do casaba melons. i'll be helping turbines power cities. i put a turbine on a cat. (friends ooh and ahh) i can make hospitals run more efficiently... this isn't a competition! ♪ how else do you think he gets around so fast? take the reins this holiday and get the mercedes-benz you've always wanted during the winter event. hurry, offers end soon.
you can't breathed. through your nose. suddenly, you're a mouthbreather. well, just put on a breathe right strip which instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. shut your mouth and say goodnight mouthbreathers. breathe right my psoriatic arthritis i'm caused joint pain.o golfer. just like my moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. and i was worried about joint damage. my doctor said joint pain from ra can be a sign of existing joint damage
that could only get worse. he prescribed enbrel to help relieve pain and help stop further damage. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common, or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding, or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. joint pain and damage... can go side by side. ask how enbrel can help relieve joint pain and help stop joint damage. enbrel, the number one rheumatologist-prescribed biologic. debates are set up with a pro and a con, it's resolved or we were thinking about lincoln
douglas. there was one lincoln douglas. it's unclear how you engineer a debate with ten or eight people that remotely resembles an actual debate. >> why don't they have a knockout? have they ever tried this? >> there was someone, sam stein yesterday at "the huffington post" wrote an article, saying, this should be a series of one on one -- >> and you knock each other outs. >> yeah, i actually think that would be better. i think it should be like march madness with brackets -- >> and you do one on one! >> an idea for the next republican debate, as a guest on t"the daily show" with trevor noah last night, i also mentioned why electing ben carson or donald trump, even nominating them, would be unprecedented historically. the united states has never, with the exception of two generals, has never -- grant and eisenhower, as far as i can tell, i think, has never elected anyone with as little political experience as donald trump and ben carson currently have. and i think there's a reason for that.
>> as a few people on the internet pointed out, i did miss one important president. well, not that important. zachary taylor, he was viewed as the hero of the mexican american war and the 12th president of the united states. he had never held elected office and he had never even voted in a presidential election until 1848, when he was elected our nation's 12th president. taylor served from 1849 until his death 16 months later from a brief illness that still puzzles historians today. technology empowers us to achieve more. it pushes us to go further. special olympics has almost five million athletes in 170 countries. the microsoft cloud allows us to immediately be able to access information, wherever we are. information for an athlete's medical care, or information to track their personal best. with microsoft cloud, we save millions of man hours, and that's time that we can invest in our athletes and changing the world.
when a moment spontaneously turns romantic, why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use, is the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. insurance coverage has expanded nationally and you may now be covered. contact your health plan for the latest information.
if yand you're talking toevere rheumyour rheumatologiste me, about a biologic... this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain and protect my joints from further damage. this is humira giving me new perspective. doctors have been prescribing humira for ten years. humira works for many adults. it targets and helps to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers,
including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com this is humira at work there's a sound bite we played you yesterday of jeb bush talking to reporters in iowa and something about it really caught my ear. >> i did well, talked about issues that are important to people. we need to start thinking about who's the person who can beat hillary clinton, rather than trying to get into small differences between each campaign. >> you see he name checked there. not any of his opponents. it was democratic front-runner hillary clinton. for the past week or so, i noticed her name coming up a lot
more often among some of the republican candidates, especially those like bush and chris christie and john kasich, who more appeal to the gop establishment than they do, at least to this point, to the base. at the undercard debate on tuesday, christie recently demoted to that debate, seemed to turn every single attack on him as to an excuse to attack hillary clinton. >> wait until you see what hillary clinton will do to this country and drown us in debt. she is the real adversary tonight. >> that represents a pretty major shift in republicans thinking about the race. because over the summer, with hillary clinton battling an ongoing string of e-mail stories and watching her poll numbers slip, i think a whole lot of republicans started to believe their own hype about her weakness as a candidate, convincining themselves that if she even got the nomination, she would be damaged goods. >> the fact is, what she has done is criminal. frankly, what she did is far worse than what general petraeus
did, and he's gone down in disgrace. >> now, those assumptions gave a lid to trump and ben carson, because if you're a republican base voter and the democratic front-runner doesn't look like much competition, you might as well go with the guy you like the most. but two important things have happened since then. we've gotten a lot closer to the first nominating contest, when voters will actually have to pick a candidate. and over the past month, helped by a well-received "snl" appearance, a strong performance at the first democratic debate, and an impressive 11 hours of testimony before the benghazi committee, clinton has appeared to turn things around. in recent national polls, she now beats all of the top five gop contenders in head-to-head matchups. that renewed formidability as a candidate is the best thing establishment candidates like jeb bush and chris christie could ask for. joining me now, betsy woodruff, political reporter at the daily beast. and betsey, you cover this election and cover republicans and republican voters. do you cover my thesis that the
weaker hillary clinton seems, the more appeal to people like carson and trump, and the stronger she's seen, the stronger she is to people like chris christie and jeb bush. >> and in the undercard debate, he said hillary clinton was a gift-wrapped present to republicans and specifically stated that primary voters should pick the candidate they think is the most conservative, because any old guy can beat clinton because she's so damaged. bobby jindal said that. so now that establishment republicans are shifting and saying, no, we need to take her seriously, that it kas they think presenting her as a presentable candidate will help that. the flip side of this, for jeb bush, chris christie, and john kasich, hillary is really, strategicingly, a good person for them to go after, because they can't really go after candidates on stage who are all going to be right of the them. it puts them in an awkward place. >> and i remember the psychology of democrats back in 2004, particularly, in that race against bush, where there was so
much disdain for george w. bush that, you know, anyone, if they sold themselves as the person that could beat bush, no matter how far left you were on the spectrum, that's all people cared about. i don't think there's that same feeling among the base right now about hillary clinton, but maybe that will change? >> i don't think that feeling exists yet, right. because republicans have built up hillary clinton as an incredibly formidable, insidious, ominous, powerful, shady figure. honestly, over the course of the last 15, 20 years that she's been in public life, right? she's seen as many things in the conservative movement, by conservatives, but she's not seen as a goofball or a buffoon. so this makes sense. it's understandable that's attack they would be taking. >> and i think we'll see now more -- i think what you are going to see, my prediction is jeb bush, probably even marco rubio, chris christie and john kasich will hammer on the fact that the primary decision procedure for a member of the republican party what's going into the polling booth is who is
best to beat hillary. and they will ride that for the next several months. >> without a doubt. and that's really been the central thesis, the central premise of jeb bush's candidacy, right? the understanding is that that how he pigeons himself to donors. i'm the only guy who can raise enough money to compete with her. i'm the only guy who won't stay goofball, bizarre-o stuff on the trail, which has been undermined now a teeny bit, maybe. that's how he's pitched himself. how kasich would pitch himself, and also rubio who is presenting himself as the guy that hillary clinton's people are the most frightened of. and that could make things a little more confusing for conservatives. >> so robert costa as a piece out, just got published, in which he says, there are some people around -- is this real? i don't know. i trust robert costa, "romney's friends are privately discussing if a late entry is possible."
you're asking, which romney? willard romney? no, mitt romney. the guy who ran and didn't win. i feel like i need to get the republican donor class on the couch and just tell them to calm down. but maybe i'm wrong and maybe they're right that ben carson and donald trump really have a shot at this thing. >> the panic is really. they're looking back at mitt romney. and that's the solution? that's just amazing. but it's understandable, right? because right now, half of the republican primary electorate wants a guy who said the pyramids were built to hold grain? and the other guy wants a guy who says with a straight face that we can humanely deport 11 million illegal immigrants. that is half of the republican primary. these are the guys who are winning. so if you're an establishment mega donor or a hedge fund billionaire, you want somebody who's more friendly to your interests, you're pulling your hair out a little bit. as far as i'm concerned, it passes the smoke test. >> betsy woodruff, thank you very much. >> sure thing. still ahead, the backlash
today, three days after the university of missouri system president stepped down following protests about how racial incidents on campus were being handled, a new interim president has taken the reins. michael middleton, former law professor and university of missouri's administrator, was named to the post earlier today. middleton, who was the third black student ever to graduate from the law school at missouri accepted the job this afternoon, promising a speedy response to threats, to members of the community. >> let me make it clear, though, that one thing will not be tolerated. and that is harmful or hurtful action to any members of our university community. any incidents will be addressed swiftly. >> also today, a second person who was arrested yesterday was
charged with two counts of making terrorist threats against students at mizzou. connor stottlemyre allegedly wrote on yik yak, an anonymous smartphone app, "i'm going to shoot any black people tomorrow, so be ready." meanwhile, howard university, acting out of an abundance of caution, increasing security after an online threat made to its students. authorities don't know if the threat is credible, but it comes at a time when protests around race, white supremacy, and inclu inclu inclui inclusi inclusivity are roiling campuses around the country. at ithaca college, hundreds of students gathered to call for the resignation of that college's president amid similar complaints. and the uprising of campuses around the country have somewhat predictably caused a backlash. we'll bring you inside that backlash, next. you can worry about them.
you can even choose a car for them. (mom) honey, are you ok? (child) i'm ok. (announcer vo) love. (mom) we're ok. (announcer vo) it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. ththere's no easy, way to do your job when you're sick. tough symptoms need alka-seltzer plus cold & cough it's four cold symptom fighters put you back in control. stay unstoppable. alka-seltzer plus.
some neighbors are energy saving superstars. how do you become a superstar? with pg&e's free online home energy checkup. in just under 5 minutes you can see how you use energy and get quick and easy tips on how to keep your monthly bill down and your energy savings up. don't let your neighbor enjoy all the savings. take the free home energy checkup. honey, we need a new refrigerator. visit pge.com/checkup and get started today. really, craig donald, what's your take on this whole missouri story -- >> i think it's disgusting.
i think it's disgusting. i think the two people who resigned are weak, ineffective people. i think that when they resign, they set something in motion that's going to be a disaster for the next long period of time. they were weak, ineffective people. how we hire people like this -- trump should have been the chancellor of that university. believe me, there would have been no resignations. >> college students around the country rise up around ae allegations of racial insensitivity, republican hopefuls for the most part are lining up to condemn them. donald trump came out with the strongest opposition, calling the demands of students who successfully ousted two top university officials earlier this week, quote, crazy. but others like ben carson, rand paul, and carly fiorina are also rushing to join the backlash against the campus protests. >> we need to recognize that this is a very dangerous trend. when we get to a point where a majority can say, i don't like what you're doing, that's offensive, and therefore, i have
a right to be violent toward you or to deprive you of rights because i don't like what you're doing, you know, that really goes against the grain of our constitutional rights. >> i think freedom of speech is very, very important. does freedom of speech mean that there will be borish people. people who say things that you don't want to associate with? yes. >> political correctness is now choking conversation in this nation. >> marco rubio used a similar line, speaking to "the washington post" reporter. quote, freedom of speech seems to be under assault in some of the finer institutions of this country. chris christie, however, went one step further, claiming that protests are a product of lawlessness that obama allows. to be clear, it's not just 2016 presidential hopefuls that are knocking the campus protesters. in a heated debate among liberals and others about whether the campus protests constitute pc culture run amok
hey! how are you?g? where are we watching the game? you'll see. i think my boys have a shot this year. yeah, especially with this new offense we're running... i mean, our running back is a beast. once he hits the hole and breaks through the secondary, oh he's gone. and our linebackers and dbs dish out punishment, and never quit. ♪ you didn't expect this did you? no i didn't. the nissan altima. there's a fun side to every drive. nissan. innovation that excites. we heard you got a job as a developer!!!!! its official, i work for ge!! what? wow... yeah! okay... guys, i'll be writing a new language for machines so planes, trains, even hospitals can work better. oh! sorry, i was trying to put it away... got it on the cake. so you're going to work on a train? not on a train...on "trains"! you're not gonna develop stuff anymore? no i am... do you know what ge is?
theand to help you accelerate,. we've created a new company... one totally focused on what's next for your business. the true partnership where people,technology and ideas push everyone forward. accelerating innovation. accelerating transformation. accelerating next. hewlett packard enterprise. joining me now, brittany cooper, assistant professor of women and gender studies, and greg lukiana, author of "unlearning liberty: campus censorship and the end of the american debate." greg, let me start with you. i feel like there's been a lot of things run together in people's lines, a lot of lack of analytical clarity here.
let's talk about mizzou. in missouri, you have students of color who said there were threatening incidents that happened on campus, as far as the swastika, they felt they weren't sufficiently dealt, they protested, the president stepped down in response. in the last few days, we've seen actually criminally prosecutable threats. >> yeah. >> and i don't see why this is -- i really fail to see why this is an example of pc culture run amok. >> well, it's actually very positive free speech story, with one exception. there was that regretful incident where a student journalist was trying to take pictures on campus and was met by first a ton of students. student journalists who were trying to be on campus, and being told by a white media studies professor, hey, i'm going to get some muscle to stop you from doing your job here. so that was the only real sort of like free speech element. oh, also, they were telling police that they need to be on the lookout for hurtful speech. >> brittany, that incident that went very viral, it was a
student photographer, he was working, i believe, for espn, and he was trying to take pictures, and he was blocked. and basically, the student protester said, we've created a space free of media here on the public quad. a lot of people took issue with that. i thought it was wrong. what was your sense of it? >> one of the things we've got to be thinking about is that these young black students are saying to us that surveillance is a threat to them. they're not talking about trying to limit the press or trying to limit freedom of expression, they are trying to figure out how you have social movements in which black students are hypersurveilled on these campuses and are hypervisible. and also where media coverage of these stories is usually quite hostile to these students. it is not usually sympathetic. especially when we're having ridiculous conversations. so, for instance, about freedom of speech, when thesis students are really asking us about what it means to be physically and emotionally uh unsafe on these campuses. that's the issue.
this is not an issue of black students who are advocating for the right to be in safe places, trying to limit other folks' constitutional rights, and it's extremely dishonest to assume or act that is the conversation we're trying to have. >> greg, your response to that? >> well, it's one of those things, i think it's funny. there was an article that rab today called "the free speech diversion," and it ran maybe yesterday in "the new yorker." and to me, i've been fighting for campus free speech for my entire career, going back to 2001. and we've been defeating the kind of things that would have made the protests at missouri and at yale impossible, including free speech zones. these ridiculous pins that administrators have set up at colleges across the country that tell students that they can only protest, literally, in 20-foot-wide gazebos that they need advance permission to use. so when we say, free speech is a diversion, no, you've been missing the fight that's been going on for decades now. >> brittany, do you want to respond that? >> sure. the problem is that you're
making an argument, sir, that free speech is the most fundamental concern here. look, african-american folks have always had to fight for our rights to enjoy all of these freedoms. so we value them just like you do, but there is something that is as fundamental to the right to free speech, and that's the right to move through the world unharassed. so what we have here is a complicated situation in which there's a white privilege in the ability to make this conversation about the threat to freedom of speech and it supplants our ability to have a more robust conversation about the threat to move through the world in an african-american or black body without being harassed. and so, that is the conversation i want folks to be having. it's not -- yes? >> let me ask a question here. you use this term, "emotional harm," which i think to me really gets to the bedrock here. from the subjective experience of these students, right, whether it's the cameras or it's the way that they are being looked at or talked about, there's like some really genuine emotional harm happening there. and you use the word
"harassment," those are real things, and i don't want to discount them. but there's also, it seems to me, they can be the by-product of speech. people can say things that really, genuinely, you do emotionally harm. they may even make you in some sense feel unsafe or feel harassed. figuring out what that line is seems to be a pretty tricky thing. because if that category expands big enough, you do start to encroach on debate. >> sure, but let's be clear that black students aren't going and complaining to the administration every time someone says something that is remotely offensive to them. these were a series of escalating incidents in which students were moving around and being yelled at, so that they felt physically unsafe. that's very different than a student in your class said something that was racially insensitive and now you're calling on the administration to sensor them. and i've spoken very robustly about the fact that i think there should be limits on trigger warnings, largely because those are often attempts by privileged white students to place their emotional harm at the center of the conversation.
so i think that we keep on mischaracterizing what black students are asking for here. they are saying to us that these threats make them feel physically unsafe and not just emotionally unsafe. and that has to matter to administrators, who do have some power over creating inclusive and respectful campus culture. >> greg? >> but i want to get back to the idea that you can dismiss the free speech elements of this case. let's take the case in yale. that involved a lecturer that sent out an e-mail saying, should campuses really be telling people how to dress for halloween? and the protest in response for that and the demand for her to be fired, that still hasn't been amply addressed. and my bottom line on this entire discussion is yale is no longer about free speech, as long as the case there, as long as the administrations say, nicholas and erica will not be punished for what they said. >> all right. brittney -- sorry, i'm sorry to cut you yooff. i think this is a topic that
could go way longer than just this. but that was clir anying. thank you for joining me. that is "all in" for this evening. t"the rachel maddow show" start now. >> good evening, chris. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. presidential debates ton republican side have been kind of a headache for republican party leaders this year. the party tried to take control of the debate process this year, as compared to how it went in 2012, when there was just willy-nilly debates all the time and the party had no say. the party taking control of the process this year has had good points and bad points. one of the bad points, is that it has led the party's own candidates to start attacking the party for how they're handing the debate issue. the candidates have also, of course, feuded this year with the debate moderators. various campaigns have threatened to revolt over the various formats in the debate. the formats that have been agreed to by the republican party and the network. al