tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC January 15, 2016 6:00pm-7:01pm PST
president. it's not a surprise secretary clinton is trying to cozy up to the president as much as humanly possible. but we all know that the truth of the matter is if secretary clinton had her way that n. 2008 there would not have been any president barack obama. >> but it is true that senator barack obama -- the substantive point is senator barack obama did take a lot of money from finance and did pass a wall street regulatory bill. >> well, it was very different in 2008 than it is in 2016 and the ability to raise money. now, obviously the president raised a lot of money online. that's for sure. but the technology now is far superior in terms of being able to raise money online. bernie sanders' message is reaching out to people across this country. he's being funded with a grassroots campaign. it is not entirely clear that that magnitude of fund-raising could have been accomplished in 2008. >> all right. jeff weaver, thanks a lot for joining me tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, chris. have an excellent weekend, my friend. >> you too. >> and thanks to you at home for
joining us this hour. javy friday. the numbers are in on the republican debate last night. turns out it was the least viewed republican debate yet. which kind of surprises me. i mean, in the big picture there's still nothing to complain about. the numbers are still giant. but fewer people watched last night's republican debate than any of the others this past year. the first one you'll remember was giant 24 million viewers. the second one 23 million viewers. the third one was 14 million. the fourth was 13 million. the fifth one went up a little bit. that was the las vegas one on cnn. that went up to 18 million viewers. kind of looked like maybe viewership had gone down but it was coming back up. but last night it was back down to the lowest yet. it was 11 million people watching the main stage seven-kidnap republican debate last night in south carolina. and if you want to see how that stacks up against the democratic debates, even with the republican numbers dropping, the republicans are still sitting pretty in terms of the size of the audiences they're reaching. the democrats of course this year have decided to hide their light under a bushel. so the republicans have done six
debates so far. the republicans have only done three. the last two democratic debates with viewership down there in the 8 million range, those were both held on weekend evenings. not a great time to get big audiences. that scheduling plan is also true of the next democratic debate, which will be this weekend on nbc. 9:00 on sunday. on the sunday of a three-day weekend. it's kind of amazing. the democratic party has done everything it can to ensure the smallest possible audiences for their candidates' debates this year. but in terms of this next one, the race right now is so tight and it's so increasingly snippy between bernie sanders and hillary clinton, i don't think anybody really knows what kind of numbers they're going to get on sunday night. sunday night of a 408d weekend is a weird time to do it. but with what's going on in the race right now and the anticipation about iowa and new hampshire might be a bigger crowd than the democrats are expecting. so that'll be one really interesting thing to see about sunday. here's the truly amazing thing,
though, about the democrats' debate schedule. this sunday night debate for the democrats, this is it. they're not holding any more democratic debates or before new hampshire. contrast that with the republicans. the republicans debated last night. that was their sixth debate. they've still got another one scheduled before iowa. and then they've still got another one scheduled after that between iowa and new hampshire. but for the democrats, no. it's just this sunday night of mlk day weekend. and that's it until mid february. it's just amazing. but we've got these new viewership numbers today for the republican debate last night. we also got some very intriguing news from the closed-door republican party winter meeting that they held at the site of their debate last night in south carolina. turns out at that meeting a member of the rnc, a man named holland redfield, great political name, holland redfield got up at that meeting and made
an impassioned speech to the rest of the republican party and reportedly to reince priebus himself, the party chairman. he was apparently in the room when this happened. he was sort of the person to whom this speech was directed. but this rnc official, holland redfield, got up and in impromptu remarks said that the republican presidential candidates this year were saying things on the debate stage and saying things in the media that "if your child was doing that you would put that child over your knee and spank them." he lamented with a lot of passion how republican candidates this year in his words were showing "disrespect for ethnic minorities and religious factions in the united states." he said, "we have to draw the line on that because sooner or later somebody has to pick up the pieces." but then he closed with this very emotional plea. that this crop of republican presidential candidates is basically destroying his republican party. >> a good politician is pragmatic. they have to be to succeed. otherwise, you get this energy
in the nation, right now, that is angry, frustrated, and they want to hit anybody. so we have certain candidates that are sucking that up and changing our label. as a party we owe it to ourselves to speak out and not have the tail wag the dog and not have somebody say all of a sudden if you don't play my game then i'm running as an independent or i'm doing this. i'll see and i'm judge you. good god, many of you have been in this room for year after year after year. working the trenches. and all of a sudden somebody's going to tell you any one of them? this is our party. it's the people's party. not the tnds'. i' candidates. i've had it. thank you. >> that's a member of the republican national committee. he represents the u.s. virgin islands, which is an obscure part of the american polity, right? in terms of influence.
but politico.com was sent that tape of him today from what was supposed to be a closed-door private meeting. and even though this is just one rnc committee man from the virgin islands, this tape of him making this impassioned plea about what happened to his party because of this presidential campaign, this got front-page play all day long at politico.com. it got huge attention in the beltway press today. and it's interesting because it's no secret that the republican party accomplishment is worried about donald trump. right? they're worried about what donald trump is doing to the republican party as an constitution, what his front-running candidacy is doing to the whole idea of what it means to be a republican. it's one thing, though, to know that in the abstract. it's another thing to see it. it's another thing to know what that sounds like word for word behind closed doors when the republican establishment thinks they're alone trying to figure out how they're going to do something about it. just fascinating. that was kind of the front page of the beltway press today. the home town press, though, was probably even worse today for chris christie. worse today for chris christie
thn than i think it was for any of the other republican presidential candidates who made it onto that main debate stage last night. >> let's set the facts straight. first of all, i didn't support sonia sotomayor. secondly ix never wrote a check to planned parenthood. >> survey says? [ buzzer ] everybody gets fact checked after the debates. that's one of the things we do in the political media. now every newspaper does, that every wire does that. they run fact checks of how closely the candidates hue to the truth at big events like this and it has no impact whatsoever. but the chris christie fact checks from last night's debate are so blunt and so outrageous that they're actually -- i think they're actually funny. so for example, chris christie said last night, let's set the facts straight. first of all, i didn't support sonia sotomayor. the "star ledger" in new jersey gleefully posted chris christie's official statement on sonia sotomayor whenfrom when she was nominated in 2009. "i support her appointment to
the supreme court and urge the senate to confirm her nomination." >> i didn't support sonia sotomayor. >> yes. yes, you did. and what wa ts the other thing wanted to get the facts straight on? >> secondly, i never wrote a check to planned parenthood. >> again, back to the hometown press, back to the "star ledger" in new jersey. they gleefully today go to their own archives from september 30th, 1994, which in a news article from that date quotes chris christie directly. "i support planned parenthood privately with my personal contribution." >> i never wrote a check to planned parenthood. >> i would say yes -- you know, to be fair, "i never wrote a check to planned parenthood." his personal contribution could have been not in the form of a check. he could have brought them a bucket full of nickels or something. maybe it was cash. maybe he gave them a gold
krugerrand. i don't know. maybe it wasn't a check and that's what he means, even though he was previously directly quoted saying he gave them a personal contribution. in an editorial about this planned parenthood thing, an editorial the "star-ledger" titles "another day, another lie," chris christie's hometown paper notes that if the governor is denying the accuracy of that direct quote he gave to that paper in 1994, saying he gave money to planned parenthood, if he's now saying that quote is incorrect he can very easily take it up with the reporter who quoted him saying that back in the day because the reporter who wrote that article in 1994 and quoted chris christie directly where he said "i gave money to planned parenthood," that reporter is now chris christie's official spokesman in the new jersey governor's office. so if he's denying now all these years later that that quote was accurate, you can take it up with the guy who has to tell that to the press on the governor's behalf. so that's awkward.
and you know, every politician has trouble with the press to some degree from time to time. but chris christie's dogged hometown press corps is just stuck to him like a rash. a few months ago it was the "star-ledger" editorial board that said that chris christie "lies like the rest of us brush our teeth, as a matter of routine." no matter how well chris christie does in his presidential campaign, no matter how many main stages he makes of the debates now, honestly his hometown press is never going to let go of him. but the worst press of the day actually happened to old jeb bush. jeb bush i think had really wanted and expected this to be a good news day for him. it started off with lindsey graham endorsing him in south carolina. they did an event together. they even shared a funny joke about people who do not eat meat. >> the thing i like most about jeb is he's not overselling. he's embracing the fact that we're a diverse country, we have to sit down and work with
democrats and independents, libertarians, and vegetarians, to get immigration right -- >> i have to work with vegetarians? >> yes, you do. there are not many in south carolina but we're going to win the vegetarian vote. >> it's funny, right? all started great for jeb bush today. if they kept that patter going, they probably would have gotten around to a hilarious joke about bill clinton being a vegan or something. you see where this is going. this is good post-debate momentum. but instead what broke is this story, also at politico.com, which is just devastating for jeb bush. look at the headline. "bush donors await green light to jump ship." and that is a terrible headline not just because it's a mixed metaphor. is the bear catholic? the reason this is terrible is because politico got blind quotes from members of the republican donor class who for some reason are willing to tell reporters what they really think about jeb bush even though at least nominally they are still supporting him and giving him money.
"politico talked to nearly two dozen major donors. most say they are waiting for what veteran republican described as the family hall pass to jump to another campaign after the new hampshire primary. one top bush wlls donor tells politico, i'm resigned to it being over, frankly. it's really disappointing. i'd urge him to get out after new hampshire if he doesn't do well, but he probably won't." just think about -- if these folks really are bush supporters, bush donors, why do they talk to the press about him this way? the worst things that have been said about jeb bush in the press this year have been said by people who are supposedly supporting him. and then the next quote they've got, and this is even worse. this is a direct quote. a bush fund-raiser has told donors recently, "hey, i need you to throw away money on jeb out of loyalty." if that's what's being said, the only people who presumably heard that said were either the fund-raiser who said it or the donors to whom the fund-raiser
was talking. these are all high-level jeb bush supporters, but they're willing to give a deadly quote like that to the press about jeb. with friends like these who needs far more skilled and attractive competitors? the "washington post's" robert costa has been reporting today and tonight on the dawning realization in republican circles that none of the establishment candidates might make it and it really might be donald trump or even ted cruz as the party's nominee. joining us now is robert costa from the "washington post." he's also an msnbc contributor. robert, i know your piece on this just posted within the last hour at the post. thanks very much for joining us. i know you're busy. >> thank you. >> so your lead is as the presidential primary moves into a more urgent and xative phase there is growing acceptance among washington elite that ted cruz and donald trump are the two most likely to become the party's nominee. what are the signs of that growing acceptance? what does that mean? >> some stunning signs tonight.
my colleague phil rucker and i were calling around the republican establishment to top donors in the party and post this last debate we said where is the donor class moving and they said there's a new realization within this group, the billionaires and the millionaires that have funded the party for decades, that is in essence a two-person race, trump versus cruz, and there's an inclination now that trump could be the nominee, and there are people right now reaching out to trump to try to get meetings to try to get in his inner circle and that was said on the record by romney's former finance chairman. >> the implication there is that establishment donors, establishment sort of big ticket republicans in looking at trump versus cruz they're going to side with trump? >> there's an inclination toward trump over cruz. and not so much because they know trump well but it seems to be more of their ilk. he's someone who has a lot of friends on wall street. cruz does as well, but cruz is a hard-liner. he's ideological. the gop donor class is not so
much driven by ideology but by power. >> one of the complications here, at least in terms of understanding this as normal politics or something we might be able to extrapolate from past experience, is is that mr. trump is not really accepting donations. there are small dollar donation that's are being made to him but the way that big ticket republican donors are used to being courted and used to having influence and used to having march decisions is who's going to take their money and what kind of access that's going to give them. if donald trump is going to continue to not take a lot of money, then what sort of dynamic is going to exist between him and this donor class? >> that's the central important question. donors right now in the republican party are recalibrating how they think through their relationships with candidates. they know trump doesn't want to accept major checks in the primary race. so they're thinking ahead to a possible general election. the way they gamed it out to the warrant warrant tonight, they said we'll have to donate to the party committee, we'll have to prove if trump's the nominee we're supporting him by supporting the rnc and different
senate and house committees. they're just rethinking the whole way they would handle a general election to try to make sure the nominee, should it be trump, liked them and would perhaps bring them in should there be a new republican administration. >> robert, from the conversations you and phillip are having with these folks, is it a dead end for ted cruz? i think it may be frustrating for those donors as they try to approach trump if trump hues to his plan that he's been on thus far. does ted cruz really have nowhere to go with them? >> no, i wouldn't say that at all because while there is a consensus this is becoming a two-man race among the donors, the top donors in the party, there's also a lot of hesitation still about trump. people are covering their bets. they're getting ready for trump should he be the nominee. at the same time cruz is a texas soern. he's someone who's part of an institution, even if he's not popular there, and he makes a lot of people -- some people more comfortable in the donor class. there is a split between trump and cruz. it seems to be a little more leaning toward trump because he's not ideological and a hard-liner. >> this is an amazing turn of
events. it seems weird as an observer. but if you're a republican establishment figure used to the way republican politics goes, this must be a total acid trip. robert costa from the "washington post." msnbc contributor. robert, thanks. fascinatesing reporting. thank you. >> thank you. >> i will say going back to the vegetarian theme of the jeb bush/lindsey graham joke will this really is like there's some sort of vegan convention, there's some sort of vegetarian convention and they've decided the choice they're going to give people for dinner is two different varieties of barbecue. it's like do you want ribs or do you want brisket? and people are just like no, but i'm hungry. the republican donor class deciding to treat donald trump and ted cruz. we'll be right back. y not alway. but at t. rowe price, we can help guide your retirement savings. for over 75 years, investors have relied on our disciplined approach to find long term value. so wherever your
retirement journey takes you, we can help you reach your goals. call a t. rowe price retirement specialist or your advisor ...to see how we can help make the most of your retirement savings. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. i tabut with my back paines, i couldn't sleep and get up in time. then i found aleve pm. aleve pm is the only one to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am.
happening this sunday on nbc chuck todd and andrea mitchell would be helping to ask questions. that's what i thought was happening. but i was wrong. and so i said it wrong on tv and i'm sorry. what is going to happen is as i explained lester holt is going to be the moderator of the debate. lester holt from nbc "nightly news." it is andrea mitchell who will be helping ask questions. what chuck todd is actually going to be doing is hosting the pregame right here on msnbc. sought pregame for the debate is at 8:00 here on msnbc with chuck todd. the debate is at 9:00 on nbc. lester holt with andrea mitchell contributing some questions. it's going to be great. i'm sorry i was confusing. we will see you there sunday night. you think you're doing all you can
for your heart health, ...but 9 out of 10 americans... ...aren't getting enough important omega-3s. bayer pro ultra omega-3 can help, with two times the concentration of omega-3s than the leading brand. love your heart ... with bayer pro ultra omega-3. ever since i had a pretty bad accident three years ago. the medical bills - the credit card debt all piled up. i knew i had to get serious my credit. so i signed up for experian. they have real, live credit experts i can talk to. they helped educate me on how debt affected my fico score. so i could finally start managing my credit. now my credit and i - are both healing nicely. get serious about your credit. get experian. go to experian.com and start your credit tracker trial membership today. it's easy to love your laxative when that lax loves your body back. only miralax hydrates, eases and softens to unblock naturally, so you have peace of mind from start to finish. love your laxative. miralax.
there have been a few stories over the years that we have zeroed in on on this show before anybody else in the national media really focused on them. stories that ended up ultimately becoming really big important national consequence stories. one of them was the chris christie bridge scandal. there were great new jersey reporters covering that story but we were the first national press to give it any sustained attention before that story blew up nationally the way it did. i think the flint water story sadly is another one. great local reporting by michigan public radio and the "flint journal" and the "detroit free press" and other local publications. great activism locally. but we were the first national press to give it sustained attention before that story blew up the way it's still blowing up nationally right now. but there is another one of these kinds of stories. another one that we were basically first to in the national press. we covered the heck out of for months. which is now coming back.
it's the story of virginia's republican governor bob mcdonnell. his multiple felony corruption charges. that story appeared to be over. once the good governor got convicted on multiple felonies and sentenced to years in federal prison, it felt like it was over. then it really felt like it was over when he lost his appeals. but now all of a sudden it's back. and it's back in a way that could potentially bring a lot of other public corruption cases back from the dead with it. it's a fairly shocking turn of events here. it broke late today. and that story's next. stay with us. this is sheldon,
whose long day setting up the news starts with arthritis pain and a choice. take tylenol or take aleve,.. the #1 recommended pain reliever by orthopedic doctors. just two aleve can keep pain away all day. back to the news. [so i use quickbooks and run mye entire business from the cloud. i keep an eye on sales and expenses from anywhere. even down here in the dark i can still see we're having a great month. and celebrate accordingly. i run on quickbooks.that's how i own it. ♪ ♪ ♪ why fit in when you were born to stand out. the 2016 nissan altima has arrived. ♪
...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine, i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. see if you're eligible for 12 months free at mybreo.com.
march 2013 "washington post" ran a strange article about who had really paid for the wedding of the governor of virginia's daughter. the governor said that he had paid for the wedding, but it turns out he didn't. it turns out a businessman participate for it and the businessman who paid for the wedding also had showered governor mcdonnell and his family with hundreds of thousands of dollars of gifts and loans and vacations and golf games and white ferrari the government got to drive for a while and all the rest of it. it all came out. in 2014 governor mcdonnell and his wife were all convict on multiple felony corruption charges, not just for taking those gifts but because federal prosecutors proved in court that in exchange for those gifts the governor helped the businessman out. he arranged meetings for him with state officials, let him host events at the governor's mansion, even pushed the businessman's request that the guy's dietary supplement should
be studied by virginia's public health researchers. he was convicted, sentenced to prison. today a year and a half after that conviction and almost a year exactly since the governor was sentenced to years of federal prison time, today the united states supreme court said they're going to hear bob mcdonnell's case. the supreme court is taking this back up. whoo. what does this mean? joining us now is ari melber, abc's chief legal correspondent. ari, that's my very erudite way of expressing the key question here. what does this mean? >> what it means anytime the supreme court grants search to review a case is at least four members think something subpoena up, something orth their very limited time and valuable attention. either they want to consider overturning this conviction or they think it raises important broader issues that they want to deal with. >> and the broader issues would be that they don't like the federal statutes that resulted in the conviction, that there's
something wrong with the law? >> something that is in their view either wrong with the law or that prosecutors have done to stretch the law. as you know, this big issue in this case is what is an official act. right? what does it mean if the governor takes money and then goes to do smk about it? what does it mean if he does something that is official using his power versus whatever else might be a part of his job or unimportant part. so there may be a concern here that this supreme court, which we know is skeptical of what we might call regulating politics, that it's concerned that the prosecutorial theory here that what basically the federal government did was expand the notion of what unofficial acts are, which might make it easier for them to convict people who take bribes, gifts, money, whatever, and try to do things with it. >> so the appeal -- the case on appeal from bob mcdonnell's lawyers has been, listen, he took these gifts and you may think it's ugly and he may be really tacky but it's not illegal under virginia law or federal law for him to take these things, what's illegal is for him to do stuff in his
official capacity as governor in exchange for them, it's the quid pro quo. and what tar saying is what he did was just normal political stuff he would have done for anybody, when you arrange a meeting for somebody that's not an act, that's just a thing you do that doesn't depend on you being governor, i guess? >> yeah. >> is this a theory that people push broadly because they don't like public corruption prosecutions or is this going to be a bob mcdonnell-specific ruling? >> that's a great question. i think it can be broader. there aren't many states where you can just take this much in gifts and not be in trouble under state law to begin with. so it's not going to necessarily hit everywhere. but the idea here, rachel, is essentially maybe we were a little corrupt and a little briby but we weren't very effective, so don't worry about it because the only thing we did was we did a photo op or had a meeting. no one, for example, contests that a staffer did go to a meeting. what they're saying is hey, that doesn't rise all the way to the level of pulling this off.
of course the government has responded here going all the way up to the supreme court. so it's the obama administration's lawyer is responding saying no, this was an official attempt to help the person bribing you. how effective your attempts were aren't the test. the test -- >> if you were bad at paying somebody the quo in the quid pro quo doesn't mean you weren't engaged in a bribery transaction. >> exactly. >> fascinating. ari melber, msnbc chief legal correspondent. when this goes further along and they're going to hear this case and rule on it eventually we're going to have you back to explain that too. >> i would love to. i think the oral arguments are going to be fascinating. >> i wonder if they'll let me in. much more to come this busy friday night. stay with us. ♪ there it is... this is where i met your grandpa. right under this tree.
♪ (man) some things are worth holding onto. they're hugging the tree. (man) that's why we got a subaru. or was it that tree? (man) the twenty-sixteen subaru outback. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me. with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine
to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. it should be used along with diet and exercise. trulicity is not recommended as the first medicine to treat diabetes and should not be used by people with severe stomach or intestinal problems, or people with type i diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. trulicity is not insulin and has not been studied with long-acting insulin. do not take trulicity if you or anyone in your family has had medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 or if you are allergic to trulicity or its ingredients. stop using trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of an allergic reaction, such as itching, rash, or difficulty breathing; if you have signs of pancreatitis such as severe stomach pain that will not go away and may move to your back, with or without vomiting; or if you have symptoms of thyroid cancer, which may include a lump or swelling in your neck, hoarseness, trouble swallowing, or shortness of breath. medicines like trulicity may cause stomach problems, which could be severe. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and any medicines you take. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting,
decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney failure. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option, ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. and click to activate your within. learning new details tonight about that horrible accident involving two u.s. marine corps helicopters which collided in mid-air apparently off the coast of hawaii today. we do get news about training accidents from time to time in the u.s. military. this one stands out specifically because the human toll in this one may be really high. it was 12 u.s. marines who were on board these two heavy lift cargo helicopters. they're ch-53 hefrplicopters. usually called sea stallions.
they took off from the local marine corps base last night. officials say they were on a routine nighttime training mission. but at around 11:30 p.m. local time last night in hawaii coast guard says they were contacted by someone who had been walking on the beach. that person reported seeing a fireball in the air. minutes later the coast guard says they got another call, this one from somebody reporting a flare in the sky. officials now believe that what those two separate witnesses saw was a helicopter accident, what appears to have been a collision between the two choppers. tonight a search and rescue operation is still under way. the coast guard is leading this effort. they're getting help from local authorities. the navy has dispatched two destroyers to help search for any survivors. the search area is really big. and it's about seven miles offshore. the whole area they're searching stretches about 20 miles. officials say debris has been found across that entire area. the weather has also been making the search difficult. they say it's very choppy waters, there are waves in that area as high as 40 feet. very bad news is that as of
tonight none of the marines on board those two helicopters have been found. officials say the search efforts could last for several more days. but this is 12 u.s. marines we're talking about. it's just terrible news so far. we'll keep you posted if and when we learn more. money now, are you investing? well, i've been doing some research. let me introduce you to our broker. how much does he charge? i don't know. okay. uh, do you get your fees back if you're not happy? (dad laughs) wow, you're laughing. that's not the way the world works. well, the world's changing. are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is managed? wealth management, at charles schwab. [ sneezing ] a cold can make you miserable. luckily, alka seltzer plus cold and cough liquid gels. rush liquid fast relief to your tough cold symptoms. fast, powerful liquid gels from alka seltzer plus performance... ...reimagined.
style... ...reinvented. sophistication... ...redefined. introducing the all-new lexus rx and rx hybrid. agile handling. available 12.3-inch navigation screen and panorama glass roof. never has luxury been this expressive. this is the pursuit of perfection. this just got interesting. why pause to take a pill? or stop to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas for pulmonary hypertension, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours.
if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis and a $200 savings card you've put out a xil of statements already on the lead poisoning crisis in flint, michigan which we've covered a lot. >> yes. >> i know you spent a couple of staffers yesterday to meet with the mayor in flint. >> yes. >> what is your view of what's wrong there? if you were president now, would you do something in terms of the response that isn't already being done? >> right now as best i can understand the governor, the republican governor, governor snyder, is refusing to ask for the triggering of the federal help that he needs in order to take care of the people who are his constituents. and i am just outraged by this. i would pull out every stop. and i think i would look for any
provision in the law that would permit me to override the lack of request from the governor if he refuses to still ask for what i think his people deserve to have. >> presidential candidate hillary clinton on this show last night saeg if she were president she'd be doing everything in her power to help flint, michigan with its lead-poisoned water crisis. within two hours of her saying that governor rick snyder officially asked the federal government for help in flint. he is now asking president obama for both an emergency declaration and a major disaster declaration for flint. he's now requesting nearly $100 million in federal help, both for water distribution and for repairing flint's ruined water pipes. according to the governor's office, "the expense of replacing infrastructure and keeping the community supplied with safe drinking water is more than the state can bear." fema is going to make a recommendation on this request to president obama, and then president obama will decide what
aid to provide. white house press secretary josh earnest said today that this decision about flint from the federal government could come as early as this weekend. and none too soon. that said, it does remain to be seen how much help the federal government will provide for a disaster that was manmade, that the state, the snyder administration inflicted on its own city. but again, that federal decision could come as soon as this weekend. signs indicate that it probably will. so watch for that over the course of the weekend. we'll be right back. increases our need for antioxidants. let's add one a day men's vitacraves. a complete gummy multivitamin with antioxidants ... ... to help meet your increased needs. one a day. they don't worry if something's possible. they just do it. at sears optical, we're committed to bringing them eyewear that works as hard as they do. right now, buy one pair and get another free. quality eyewear for doers. sears optical
fair warning here. this is a little bit intense. >> there are families whose -- we're talking christian families, pastors' families, elders' families, and good godly churches. their sons are rebelling, hanging out with homosexuals and getting married. and the parents are invited. what would you do if that was the case? here's what i would do. sack cloth and ashes at the entrance to the church. and i'd sit in cow manure and i'd spread it all over my body. that's what i would do. and i'm not kidding. i'm not laughing. i'm grieving! i'm mourning! i'm pointing out the problem! it's not a gay time! these are the people with the sores, the gaping sores. the sores that are pussy and gross and people are coming in and carving happy faces on the
sores. that's not a nice thing to do. don't you dare carve happy faces on open pusy sores. don't you ever do that. don't you ever do that. i tell you don't do it. sack cloth and ashes. this is what america needs. america needs to hear the message. we are messed up. >> oh, yes, we are. that was pastor kevin swanson at a religious liberties conference that he hosted in november in des moines, iowa. the pretty major theme of that event, both in terms of literature that was available at the event and the way the host of the conference spoke from the stage of that conference, pretty major theme was the issue of basically the practical challenges and the timing of how exactly and when exactly the united states should start rounding up gay people in this country in order to execute them because according to this pastor it's really just a matter of implementation and timing.
he says it is absolutely settled as a moral matter and a judicial matter that the appropriate punishment for the crime of being gay ought to be that the government should have you killed. >> this is the highest level, the very highest level of clarity where the word of god has spoken, both old testament and new testament, ought not to be any debate whatsoever about it. and you know what that sin is. it's the sin of homosexuality. romans 1, first corinthians chapter 6. first timothy i think it's chapter 4. and of course leviticus 18 and leviticus 20. the word of god speaks there both -- in fact romans chapter 1 paul affirms that this particular sin is worthy of death. in romans chapter 1. >> what made that event more than just interesting, what made it politically important on a national scale is that at that event pastor kevin swanson, that guy, was issuing his call for the death penalty for
homosexuality in america from the same stage where he welcomed not one, not two, but three republican candidates for president of the united states. ted cruz, bobby jindal, and mike huckabee all came to that event and shook the hand of the kill the gays guy. shared the stage with him and took questions from him. when we asked those three candidates about sharing the stage with this pastor who on that stage at that same event explicit called for the death penalty for gay people, we heard back only from the ted cruz campaign, which sent us this amazing two-word response. they sent us this. "not explicit." as in we did not think pastor swanson's repeated calls to kill gay people were explicit enough to require any sort of explanation from us about why ted cruz was comfortable doing this guy's event. of those three republican presidential candidates who shared the stage withevin swanson, two of them are still in the presidential race now. bobby jindal's out. but ted cruz and mike huckabee are still in. and they are both headed to another charming shindig this
weekend. and this time they'll have even more company. people for the american way now reports that even more republican presidential candidates, we think as many as seven, are going to be joining an event this weekend hosted by this guy. >> the reason satan's trying to destroy this country right now is because we send more missionaries, do more good than any nation in history. but that's all at stake right now because they've now by the act of five unelected judges, mandated something upon this country that for the first time can kill it! abortion is a horrible thing. but you and i can opt out of abortion. we just don't have them. if we have them, we then ask god to forgive us and those babies that have been slain are deposited in heaven for the next life. but when homosexuals begin lining up to adopt those children, they will -- they will literally disciple them into an early grave called hell!
>> that charming man is pastor rick scarborough. this is the guy who seven republican presidential candidates have decided to share their weekend with this weekend. the family research council says they're going to appear in a special broadcast with the guy who says he is so opposed to homosexuality that he once said he was ready to burn to death rather than accept gay marriage as legal. after the supreme court legalize theed guy marriage some media outlets contacted pastor scarborough to see if he was going to self-immolate because of the ruling. pastor rick was forced to clarify he would not actually be setting himself on fire despite his earlier promises. but where pastor rick scarborough really stands out is in his continued propagation of a theory that aids is a disease sent by god to punish gay people. which at this point is kind of an old-fashioned assertion, right? even for the religious right. rick scarborough is so old-fashioned about this he even still refers to aids by one name that was used for a hot second in the early '80s.
grid. remember that? it meant gay related immune deficiency. that misnomer really only existed for a little while in the early '80s before they 23igd out what aids and later hiv actually were. but pastor scarborough still use that's term. except he gets it wrong and he calls it grids instead of grid. >> i believe that grids was god's judgment on a sinful generation. i mean, i don't apologize for that. is it an unforgivable sin? of course not. in fact, i believe god would probably give us the cure for aids today if we put our foot down and said we no longer tolerate this, we're not going to fund it with health care, we're going to hold you accountable. i believe when we start repeating across this country some sharp probably christian or jewish researcher would find the aids cure. >> see, if we would just hold the gays accountable by refusing
to give them health care for their gay disease, then god would just give the cure for aids to some researchers. but only a christian or jewish researcher because god has standards. according to pastor scarborough god has visited many horrors on this country because of our immoral ways. he said the aurora movie theater massacre in college happened because god lowered his protection because of the number of children born without of wedlock in this country and the fact abortion is legal. also benghazi also turns out not hillary clinton's fault. or only partly her fault. pastor scarborough says god allowed the benghazi attack because "america is mired in sin." so mired are we in sin in fact that god might just nuke us all into oblivion any day now and he would be justified to do it. >> we may not conceive america -- every day i'm amazed that we live another day, that god gives us grace. this thing could all come crashing down either economically or with a series of dirty bombs going off in our
major cities or one major nuclear bomb that would destroy half the country and contaminate the rest. and if that happens god perfectly just and vindicated. because we have squandered our grace in this country. >> rick scarborough is hosting a political event with these candidates. again that's proclaimed by the family research council in their press release about the event. they're expecting jeb bush, ted cruz, ben carson, carly fi yes or nofiorina. the trump campaign told us tonight they're not participating. a live broadcast that will be beamed into conservative churches around the country. all these candidates along with their friend friend, mr. aids is
a gay plague sent by an angry god. we reached out to all the campaigns for comment on this event pl we'll let you know if we hear back. we'll let you knowe hear back. we'll let you know if hear back. we'll let you know if hear back. we'll let you know if back. or becoming the next highly-unlikely dotcom superstar. and us, we'll be right there with you, helping with the questions you need answered to get your brand new business started. we're legalzoom and we've already partnered with over a million new business owners to do just that. check us out today to see how you can become one of them. legalzoom. legal help is here. trust number one doctor recommended dulcolax constipated? use dulcolax tablets for gentle overnight relief suppositories for relief in minutes and stool softeners for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax, designed for dependable relief
spending the day with my niece. that make me smile. i don't use super poligrip for hold, because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well fitting dentures let in food particles. just a few dabs of super poligrip free is clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food particles out. try super poligrip free. more of the old lady. i'd like to see her go back to her more you know social side. (vo) pro plan bright mind promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older.
(ray) it was shocking. she's much more aware. (jan) she loves the food. (ray) she wants to learn things. the difference has been incredible. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs. ♪ don't just eat. mangia! bertolli. if you have high blood pressure many cold medicines may raise your blood pressure. that's why there's coricidin® hbp. it relieves cold symptoms without raising blood pressure. so look for powerful cold medicine with a heart. coricidin® hbp. ♪ (cell phone rings) where are you? well the squirrels are back in the attic. mom? your dad won't call an exterminator... can i call you back, mom?
he says it's personal this time... if you're a mom, you call at the worst time. it's what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. where are you? it's very loud there. are you taking a zumba class? >> hey. hey, what is that? >> who's tonight's lucky player? >> tonight, we've got larry from kirkland, washington. he's 81 years old. an education inno va tor and teacher. >> welcome. it's nice to meet you. >> rachel, love to see you. you're a favorite of mine. always have been. >> i only just met you but you're already becoming a favorite of mine as well. >> it's a pretty simple game, as you know. you're going to get three
questions. if you get at least two of them right, you will win a small piece of junk that nick will tell you. we're not very proud of this, but we will send it to you. we also have a bonus prize this week which is something random that we found in our office. it's more random than usual. nick will tell us what it is. >> this right here is a for sale barack obama's senate seat call rob blagojevich t-shirt. >> so we think this dates back to, like, 2009 to the rob blagojevich controversy. it was just shoved behind a desk in our office. it's dirty. we will launder it before we send it to you. >> just what i need. >> all right, larry, we need to bring in thes by embodied voice of steve bennon. >> good evening. >> hi, disembodied voice.
>> larry, first question is from monday's show. we reported that michigan's largest newspaper, which had dwies endorsed rick snyder for governor had nevertheless a blistering editorial for nick snyder for the handling of the led poisoning in the city of flint. what was the very provocative title of that "detroit free press" editorial. was it a, snyder to city -- drop dead. b, yes, virginia, there is a water crisis. c, heck of a job, governor. or d lansing, we have the a problem. >> i think it's c, heck of a job, governor. >> did he get that right? >> the same editorial board
endorsed snyder. they entitled their op-ed heck of a job, governor. >> heck of a job, larry. the answer is c. >> when you say heck of a job it doesn't have the other entendre. we reported on the more effective political ads in this psych. the ad features a reality show star who has become an influential figure. which candidate is that star endorsing in the ad? is it snooki for the jersey shore endorsing chris christie. is it phil robertson endorsing ted cruz, is it c, bristol palin from "dancing with the stars" endarsing carly fiorina? or is it d, donald trump from "the apprentice" endorsing
donald trump. >> let's go with a little bit of quackery and go with b. >> that's his guess. of. >> let's check wednesday's segment. >>
he's godly. he loves us, he's the man for the job and he will go duck hunting. because we're going. ted cruz is my man. i'm voting for him. >> yes. the correct answer is b, and larry is right again. >> larry, well done. one more question for you 37. >> last night's show was better than most night's shows. one of the things i asked hill clinton about was whether gender politics would be a major consideration for her if she gets a chance to pick a vice presidential running mate. she said she would be happy picking a woman or a man for the
job if she gets to pick a running mate. she flirted with one
celebrity name. was it a, phil robertson of duck dynasty, b, beyonce, c, oprah win free, or d, lee nardo dipap owe. >> seeing he's the hottest thing going right now, let's go with d. >> steve, do you have the correct answer for us? >> you don't have to choose op grisly grizz lamb adams mountain man. >> i'm going to look at a lot of different people. >> i'm not sure leonardo dicaprio is available, but we'll see. >> you have to ask the bear. >> larry is right once again.
>> larry, spectacular. spectacular. nick, obviously he won everything? >> he did. >> we're going to give you the cocktail shaker. we're going to launder the t-shirt and send it to you. it was really nice to meet you tonight. thanks for playing. >> thanks a lot. really appreciate it, rachel. >> all you have to do is e-mail us. email@example.com. operators are standing by. actually, operators are standing by. before you do that, you do have to meet your new cell mates. > due to mature subject matter, viewer discretion is advised. >> why did you hit an officer? >> we have now been dispatched. >> the jail responds with force after an officer is assaulted,