tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC June 22, 2016 1:00am-2:01am PDT
thanks for joining with us this hour.pres ential race before this one, 2012, the republican primary started off a little b crazy that year. you might remember in iowa, it was a very, very, very close finish in that first contest that year. initially the republican party in iowa announced that mitt romney had won the iowa caucuses. then the following day the chair of the iowa republican party went on the radio and said, actually, no, mitt romney didn't win the iowa caucuses, it was a tie. then after that the iowa republican party chairman came out and said, actually, it wasn't a tie, and it wasn't that mitt romney won, it was rick santorum won. then when it came time to actually pick the delegates and send delegates to the republican national convention, reflecting results of the iowa caucuses, the guy who got the most delegates to the rnc was ron paul. so the iowa start in 2012 was just nuts.
then the second contest of course was new hampshire. mitt romney easily won new hampshire. the third contest in 2012 was south carolina. south carolina was not won by mitt romney, nor was it won by rick santorum, nor was it won by ron paul. south carolina was won by newt gingrich. he won by a lot. newt gingrich beat mitt romney in south carolina that year by more than 10 points. and after that super-strong surprise showing in south carolina, there was this brief period of time in the 2012 race where newt gingrich really was the republican presidential front-runner. and of course it didn't last. but he did really beat romney by a lot in south carolina. and at the time he had this billionaire backing him who seemed ready to spend infinitely to promote newt gingrich as a candidate. the way that newt gingrich won south carolina so big was that he just brutalized mitt romney
in the press and that just seemed like a very effective thing. that wasn't going to turn around any time soon. i remember covering it at the time. i remember it was a short period of time but i remember the beltway being absolutely captivated for a short period of time by this idea that newt gingrich had come back from disgrace, right? newt gingrich had come back from the '90s. he had dug himself out of his political grave. he was going to topple mitt romney for the republican presidential nomination in 2012. for a short period of time after that huge win in south carolina, it really felt like he might. but even in the midst of that newt-mania in 2012 you could kind of tell even newt gingrich himself wasn't really swept up in it. you could kind of tell that even though he was winning right then, he sort of knew it wasn't going to last. the way you could tell that is that even when he was the front-runner, newt gingrich never stopped his book tour.
>> i recently wrote a book called "a nation like no other" designed to deal with american issues. i recently made a movie called "a city upon a hill" that explains the origins of american exceptionalism. i wrote a book "saving lives and saving money." >> former house speaker newt gingrich is running as we know for the republican nomination for president. he's also the author of the new book "the battle of the crater." >> i should say, brief commercial. calista couldn't be here because she's at a bookstore signing the new book "sweet land of liberty" which is for 4 to 8-year-olds. >> running for president among other things, it's a great way to sell your products. especially if you have a whole line of products. you can sell your books, you can sell your dvds, you can sell your wife's products, her books and dvds. during newt gingrich's presidential run, one of the things he spent time marketing
was his wife's series of children's books which are based on a character called ellis the elephant. and part of the way they sold calista gingrich's books during the newt gingrich presidential campaign is they had somebody from the gingrich campaign, a din give campaign staffer, dress up in a big plushy ellis the elephant costume. that was somebody's job on the newt gingrich for president effort, to dress as ellis the elephant to help market newt's wife's books at campaign events. and it wasn't like a one-off. they did it over and over again. over a period of months throughout the whole republican primary. so yeah, newt gingrich did technically n for president. for a while there it actually went sort of well. but the whole thing was also kind of a scam. it was also just a way for newt gingrich to make money. that's what he'd been doing for years. the years before he ran for president, after he resigned as house speaker in disgrace in an
ethics scandal in the '90s, newt gingrich made a lot of money over the years. he figured out a whole different way to make money off his political profile other than being paid as a public servant. he would, for example, write to doctors' offices and offer to give the doctor in that office an award for being a medical innovator. then when you got down to the fine print of wanting to accept your medical innovator award from newt gingrich, you'd find out that you had to pay newt gingrich thousands of dollars in order to accept his award. he did the same thing with small businesses. he would write to them on his newt gingrich letterhead. everybody recognizes the name. he'd always put the gavel on there. he'd cash in on being former speaker of the house and he'd offer to give some small business a newt gingrich-approved business award. as if he knew about your business and he was really impressed by you and he wanted to recognize you publicly. but then it would turn out you have to pay newt gingrich
thousands of dollars in order to collect this award. it was actually a minor scandal we reported on during the 2012 campaign. one of the funner scandals of that campaign where newt gingrich tried to give one of these scam awards to a small business in texas which turned out to be a really nice friendly strip club. when newt gingrich found out that it was a strip club he was giving this award to, because he was so impressed with this local business, he didn't even know what kind of business it was, they picked it out of the phone book. then the strip club owner said, thanks, we're a strip club, we'd love your award, here's your money. then newt gingrich had to rescind the award and the strip club owner had her feelings hurt. it was one of the minor newt gingrich scandals when he ran for president in 2012. it was also part of a larger pattern for him. newt gingrich had built up a career as kind of a celebrity politician con artist. and he used his presidential campaign as part of that scam. as just a way to make more money for himself, get his name out there, make sure that he could cash in further on what used to be a public service career. last night on this show, right
at the end of the show, we reported on the new financial documents that the donald trump for president campaign had just reported to the fec. we got -- a little embarrassing, we got those numbers when i was live on the air. we didn't have time like as a staff to process them. i just read them from the raw report. right after that raw report was posted on the fec website while we were live on the air. i will tell you honestly, the reason i'm furrowing my brow in that foot an is because while i was doing that breaking news story i felt maybe there was a typo or a misunderstanding or maybe my vision's going because i'm an old person now and i couldn't see a decimal point i should have been expecting. it seemed impossible the republican presidential nominee would have started the month of june with only $1 million cash on hand. that is a remarkably low number for any stage of any serious presidential race. to for the month of may, that number is still, even in the light of day, almost impossible to believe. think about it. donald trump wrapped up the
republican nomination in the first week of may. he won indiana on may 3rd. all of his opponents dropped out. he wrapped up the nomination on the third day the month. that means he had the whole rest of the month with no republican primary to worry about, the only thing he had to do the whole month was start socking away money and preparing for the general election campaign against hillary clinton. and he ended that whole month with $1 million? the cash on hand numbers from the donald trump campaign that came in at the end of the show last night, those numbers were very hard to believe. but now over the course of today, we've been able to go through not just cash on hand numbers and his fund-raising numbers, but also his spending numbers. and those are also amazing. but they tell a very different story. and we should probably not see them as so surprising because we've seen something like this before. over the course of the month of
may, the trump campaign spent a total of $6.7 million. more than $1 million of that was spent paying money to donald trump's own companies and to members of his family. that is apparently nothing new for the donald trump for president effort. we now know that pattern has basically held for the entire campaign so far. if you want to look at the entire course of his campaign, "washington post" and associated press today totaled up over $60 million that has been spent by the trump campaign, more than $6 million of that -- roughly 1 in 10 dollars spent in total on the campaign, more than $6 million has been spent buying stuff from donald trump. he has spent an incredible proportion of his campaign funds writing rent checks to himself for use of his own properties. he paid the trump international golf club in west palm beach, florida, $29,715. he paid the trump national golf
club in jupiter, florida, $35,845. when donald trump lives in florida, the place he lives is a golf club called miralago. that is donald trump's house in florida. his campaign paid over $400,000 to donald trump for use of his own house. he paid himself $400,000 for the privilege of using his own home. he paid $520,000 to trump tower which is his home in new york. he paid $135,000 to trump restaurants. that's a lot of taco bowls. he paid $26,000 to the trump national dooral, his golf course. $11,000 to his trump hotel in chicago. he's paid himself over $4 million for the privilege of renting his own private jet. the trump plaza, $99,000. the trump post office which is his hotel in washington that's not yet built, $5,000. trump soho, just under $5,000.
he paid his son's trump wine company just under $5,000. he spent campaign money on the trump grill, on trump ice, trump ice is a thing? he spent trump money at the trump cafe. and part of the mainstream republican beef with this data, with what we now know about how the trump campaign is operating, is that these are not the kinds of expenditures you would expect to see from someone who's actually running a campaign for president that intends to win the presidency. i mean, the expense when you look at what the trump campaign is actually spending their money on it's more like a concert tour. more like a promotional tour for a celebrity who's hawking something than it is like a campaign where you need people to go out and vote for you in november. the biggest expenses are private jets, renting out venues, preferably ones where mr. trump gets to pay rent to himself for using that venue, also swag. you go to a concert, there's the
swag table? merchandise is what the trump campaign is spending its money on. millions of dollars spent on trump t-shirts and especially trump hats. oh the hats. reading through the list of trump expenditures, i half expected to find that there was now a trump hat company that they had formed in order to cash in on all the hat spending the trump campaign has indulged in over the past year. in fact, there is no trump hat company. but there is this nice lady who sits on the board of eric trump's charitable foundation. she also happens to run the hat company. getting all those millions of dollars in trump campaign expenditures. the polite way to say this is, it's a racket. it's not designed to necessarily win the election. i don't know if it would be necessarily a problem to win the election. think about the merchandising opportunities in the oval office. but if he does end up winning, you can tell from the way the campaign is being run, you can
tell because we've seen lots of campaigns like this before, you can tell that winning might happen. but it's not the aim. it would be a byproduct of what is the principal effort, which is to make money. donald trump is not the first person to do this. this is what newt gingrich did in 2012. frankly, it's easier to do on the republican side because of the monetizing of republican and conservative political celebrity thanks to fox news and lots of scammy right-wing media outlets in this country. that's part of the reason why republican presidential fields are so big these days. i defy you to tell me what the job is of rick santorum. what is his job other than running for president? what's herman cain's job? what's michele bachmann's job? what's mike huckabee's job? they're all either making a living running for president, or they're making a living thereafter off the fact that they did run for president once and therefore you've heard of them. it's a racket.
the real question for the country -- that's a question for the conservative movement and the republican party and conservative media, right? like what have we created? a weird system of incentives where people appear to run for office, but mostly they run for office as a job because it helps them make merchandising money and get deals on fox news. right? i mean, that's an issue for the republican party, the conservative movement, conservative media in general. put that aside. the real question for the rest of us, for the country, is whether what we're now looking at on the presidential level, now that one of these guys is their nominee, the real question for the country is whether this book tour, this promotional tour for this political celebrity, might accidentally produce a presidential candidacy that can actually win. and that remains to be seen. but honestly, these new spending numbers put to rest any question that what we are witnessing is anything other than a promotional book tour which we should have realized from the very beginning because this is what it sounded like from the very beginning.
>> president obama, secretary kerry, i highly think you should read this book quickly. quickly! did you ever see a negotiation last so long? right? oh, he's got "the art" -- hold that book up, one of the great books. i wrote "the art of the deal," i wrote many best sellers. everybody read "the art of the deal." who has read "the art of the deal" in this room? everybody. i always say, a deep, deep second to the bible. the bible is the best. the bible. i've done great things. hey, look. i went into television, had "the apprentice." great hit, one of the most successful reality shows. i did books. many best sellers, many. "the art of the deal" is one of the biggest selling, certainly the biggest-selling business deal book by far. look, "the art of the deal." give me that book, i love that book. >> we should have known from the beginning when donald trump was hawking one of his business books at all of his campaign appearances, from the very, very start of his presidential campaign.
since then he's come out with another book that he's been selling openly on the campaign trail. the one with the scowling picture on the front. "crippled america." there are also now, and i may be breaking this news right now, but there are unconfirmed reports but there are reports that there is either an "art of the deal 2.0" in the works right now in production right now, or that mr. trump is somehow repackaging the original "art of the deal" again as a special campaign edition so he can literally cash in even further during this campaign. so these new spending and fund-raising numbers out for donald trump, they bear no resemblance to someone actually running a serious campaign for president. "the washington post" described top republicans as viewing these new numbers with both "astonishment and alarm." over what they've gotten themselves into with trump. but apparently the only thing that top republicans are concerned about is the size of
his fund-raising numbers and his cash on hand numbers. they're worried about his lack of fund-raising, worried about his lack of spending on a real campaign, they're worried about that not only for trump's own presidential effort but for knock-on effects for the ballot and across the country. republicans are less worried about the scammy aspects of donald trump's campaign financials, which are on full display today. and still on full display today, not just from this fec filing but from the desperate fund-raising appeal the trump campaign sent out as soon as this terrible financial filing went live last night. this fund-raising e-mail they sent out, it's signed by donald trump, and it says in all caps, underlined for effect, that this is the first fund-raising e-mail that trump has sent out. it actually says in the letter, "that's right, the first one." sure sign, right? whether it's a nigerian prince or newt gingrich wanting to give you an award, anything all caps and underlined that says "that's right" next to it, sure sign of a scam.
should always be greet the with great suspicion. if you get that online and it's a hyperlink, do not click. and so that's right, this is the first one. of course, this is not the first one. this is not the first fund raising e-mail from the trump campaign. that part of it as very clear, all caps, underlined lie. this is the trump fund-raising e-mail that went out this weekend claiming the trump campaign had an emergency goal of $100,000 to get ads on the air. before that it was another trump campaign fund-raising e-mail signed by donald trump, a picture of him next to his name in case you forgot what he looks like, make an investment to stop crooked hillary. before that, another one he sent out june 3rd, subject line, hillary is a liar. together we will make america great again, exclamation point, thank you very much! let's make america great again! picture donald j. trump. that's not even all of them. but after all those and others the trump campaign today sent out a fund-raising e-mail
saying, we have never sent out a fund-raising e-mail before. and they said, if you act now, every contribution will be matched up to a $2 million limit by donald j. trump himself! seriously, that is actually part of the new fund-raising e-mail, trying to make it sound like an npr fund drive but without the book bag. pretty soon they'll be tacking on reverse motorages, referrals to lawyers. donald trump told lester holt he was going to raise over $1 billion to run for the presidency. we now know that as late as may of the election year, he was only raising $3 million-something a month. and he was spending more than he was raising. he spent more than he raised in may. and a significant portion what was he spent he spent on himself and his children. and so again quoting "the washington post," to the
this with astonishment and alarm. the question is what they're going to do about it. and the answer to that question is surprisingly more than you might think. and that story is next. wahhhh... right. in. your. stomach! watch this!... >>yikes, that ice cream was messing with you, wasn't it? try lactaid, it's real ice cream, without that annoying lactose. lactaid. it's the milk that doesn't mess with you. headache? motrin helps you be an unstoppable kind of mom.
i have been a real skeptic when it comes to the idea the republican party will resist donald trump's presidential nomination in any meaningful or significant way. he needed 1237 delegates to clinch the nomination, he ended up getting well over 1,500 delegates. he won 35 states out of 50 states. he won more republican primary votes than any other republican presidential candidate in the history of republican presidential candidates. why should we think there's any chance the party could even try to oust him when he won the republican nomination this year
so definitively. everybody who ran against him got cut down, despite all the complaining from different quarters in the republican party, nobody has stepped up to try to take him on in some other way since. count me among those who have always thought it was a bunch of beltway noise that republicans might somehow undo the trump nomination after he secured it fair and square by shellacking everybody else in the primary. i've been a skeptic. but now two things have happened that have shrunk the giant bold er boulder of salt with which i have been taking these beltway stories. the fec filing showing donald trump spent the month he wrapped up the republican nomination not really running a presidential campaign at all but paying his own companies really handsomely from the entity that is supposed to be running him for president, but it's not. that's one thing that has changed. i think these financials are legitimately shocking to the republican party and to everybody in politics. everybody expected hillary clinton to be outspending him and outraising him. nobody thought it would be 40-1. nobody thought he wouldn't
actually be trying to compete. that's one thing. i do think this news that broke late last night is a very big deal. the other thing that's happened is a numbers thing but a very different numbers thing. "the washington post" reported a group of 30 republican delegates signed on to a plan to change the rules of the republican convention and let delegates vote for somebody other than donald trump. 30 delegates, yawn. that was thursday. but then sunday night the same group held a conference call to work on this strategy and apparently 1,000 people got on the conference call. i hope everybody muted. 1,000 people on the conference call. including 250 delegates. okay. now we're not talking 30 delegates, now we're talking
250. now today "the washington post" reports that the same group says they've got nearly 400 delegates on board with this strategy. that's 400 delegates. that's also a lot of apparent momentum just since late last week. overall, i am a skeptic about these efforts. i am a skeptic about these stories. but i am intrigued about this one.
you're not allowed to do it. >> maybe a little bit of a delegate revolt. that was donald trump speaking in las vegas over the weekend. joining us now is i think who he was talking about. kendall unruh, republican delegate from colorado, cofounder of a group calling itself free the delegates. thanks for being here. >> thank you for having us. >> what's the basic idea of free the delegates? >> basically, it started with a small handful of people that truly were concerned, we were delegates that in good conscience could not support this nominee. and i'm actually serving on the rules committee. and i'm going to sponsor a conscience clause. what the conscience clause states is that if a delegate, in good conscience, either personal or religious, cannot cast a ballot for this nominee, that they may claim either a personal or religious exemption and that includes anything criminal activity, moral turpitude, extreme racism or prejudice, and even if they have not adhered to our party platform. honestly, we believe with this particular example of a nominee, he has actually, aside from the criminal activity, he has
actually partaken of all of those. beyond that, my conscience clause is not just giving them the ability to unbind the delegates by law are actually truly unbound. when he says it's illegal there have been three supreme court cases, 200 historical precedents, that have said the delegates are unbound. we are going in unbound. it's just a matter of if they recognize they're unbound. what my conscience clause is doing is i like to say that the delegates already have the kryptonite but what a conscience clause will do coming out of the rules committee is it's the memo that can activate that kryptonite. because we have a demographic of activists and we have a -- republicans are rule-followers. and we're going after the grandmother that's worked in the party for 50 years, that's worked hard to get the candidates elected. she needs that rule. she has pressure put on her by a delegation chair or a
congressman saying, you can't unbind, she can stand behind that rule, it's giving her cover, saying this rnc ruling says i can. >> you're on the rules committee, how big this. >> 156 members. used to be 112. we need 56 signers because i'm one. i'm saying, let's get 56 signers of the declaration of conscience. >> how close do you think you are now and how will you know how close you get? >> i'm calling constantly. but i've got 16, 12 plus four, four soft. >> 12 firm commitments and four soft commitments, you need to get to? >> 56. my colorado rules member is also on board are i can throw him into that mix. the key is i don't have a list yet. securing data in order to get the phone numbers and the contact and who was on the rules, that was actually not even going to be released until thursday. once that's released it is all hands on deck. >> one of the things i've been following, are you confident the
rnc is going to release those names when they're supposed to? they can sort of make their own -- call their own tune. >> we have enough volunteers with 400 alternates, delegates, committee members that have committed to this cause, we get literally thousands of e-mails and texts and private messages and the data is just flowing in. this is tapped into a movement of the majority of people out there that do not want to vote for donald trump, that could not vote for donald trump. so seven out of ten can't. 60% of the people in the primary did not want donald trump. >> but he got a lot more than everybody else did. you're not contesting the fact that he won? he definitely won, it's just a question of whether the party's still going to be with him -- >> he won because of the open primaries and the blanket primaries. he took advantage of the same-day voter registration. >> you think the system was rigged for him? >> i wouldn't call it rigged. i don't like open primaries and blanket primaries. it allows people to come in and take advantage of same-day voter registration -- >> separate issue. whether he won fair and square seems to me is separate issue whether or not the party decides
at the convention that they don't want the winner of the primary to actually get the nomination. >> let me explain that because this is actually a party institution. we actually need to select our own nominee. and we don't live in a democracy. it's actually our founding fathers called it mob-ocracy, mob rule. we believe that just because the majority agrees with something doesn't make it right. and thankfully so. because the rights of minorities would never be protected. but they set that check and balance into place, as has our party followed through, we vote for a delegate to use their wisdom, their discernment, based upon the circumstances at the time, whether or not to cast that ballot. the only one that i'm accountable to, in spite of what donald trump said, we live in a false narrative that the delegates in colorado were not elected, i had to convince thousands of people to vote for me. i had did spend my own time, effort, energy, money. i'm accountable for them. if i choose to not cast a ballot on the floor for candidate a or candidate b i answer to them.
i'm not answerable to the party. i don't have to answer to the rnc. >> i think the internal dynamics of how the parties choose their nominee is going to be a much harder sell publicly than, we changed our mind, we don't want donald trump. whether or not you can get enough people to go along with you, it's something i'm watching the momentum of very closely. >> it's not just a rules committee -- >> that's not true because they already are unbound. they can take the authority on the floor. when the votes are submitted via the delegation chair, the delegates who are choosing to unbind then challenge that submission of the vote tally and they require a poll. and it has to accurately reflect the will of the people on the floor. so the rules is just the very first step. and then -- no, this stands a very good chance of winning. and the momentum is phenomenal. >> i will concede that the momentum is phenomenal and that's part of what i want to
talk about. i'd say the case you're making about the system doesn't really work the way everybody thinks it works is going to be a much harder sell. but will you stay in touch with us as this goes on? >> i will. this is a historical first. we're trying to run a campaign without a candidate. >> kendall unruh, republican delegate from colorado, cofounder of the group free the delegates. you're doing something really interesting. let us know house it goes, appreciate it. busy news night, stay with us.
former secretary of state hillary clinton has not indicated who might be her running mate this year. hillary clinton has not even indicated when she will pick her running mate this year. but today she started acting in concert with one of the high-profile contenders for that gig in a way that made a lot of people say, hm. hm is next. ♪ if you have allergy congestion, muddling through your morning is nothing new. ...your nose is the only thing on your mind... ...and to get relief, anything is fair game. introducing rhinocort® allergy spray
last time hillary clinton devoted an entire speech to tear into donald trump was in san diego earlier this month. the thing that made that speech so lethal as a political tool is she used trump's own foreign policy words to go after him. >> he praises dictators like vladimir putin and picks fights with our friends, including the british prime minister, the mayor of london, the german chancellor, the president of mexico, and the pope. he says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the miss universe pageant in russia.
he says he doesn't have to listen to our generals or admirals, our ambassadors and other high officials, because he has, quote, a very good brain. he also said, i know more about isis than the generals do, believe me. you know what? i don't believe him. >> knowing what we know about donald trump as a political animal, bite seem like after that kind of speech he would go after hillary clinton. because donald trump prides himself on being a counter puncher, right? >> you know me, i'm a counterpuncher. one thick that everybody has said, i'm a counter puncher. hit me, i hit him back. i'm a counterpuncher. >> says he's a counterpuncher. after hillary clinton's fairly devastating foreign policy speech in san diego where she just leveled him, donald trump did not counterpunch. he sent out a grand total of two tweets during that speech
saying, that's not true. a couple of rallies he said that at that speech, hillary clinton did not look presidential to him. he did not like the way that she read the teleprompter at that speech. but that was it. that was as far as it got. so now today hillary clinton that is done it again. she devoted a whole second speech to tearing into donald trump this time on the economy. and it was the same m.o., she used trump's own words to go after him. >> donald trump has said he's qualified to be president because of his business record. trump's own products are made in a lot of countries that aren't named america. trump ties are made in china. trump suits in mexico. trump furniture in turkey. trump picture frames in india. trump barwear in slovenia. and i could go on and on. he's written a lot of books about business.
they all seem to end at chapter 11. he has no credible plan for rebuilding our infrastructure, apart from the wall that he wants to build. personally i'd rather spend our money on rebuilding our schools, modernizing our energy grid. every day we see how reckless and careless trump is. he's proud of it. well, that's his choice. except when he's asking to be our president. then it's our choice. >> hillary clinton today in columbus, ohio. and just like the last time she did this, the clinton campaign followed that speech with an e-mail blast of donald trump's words. links to the things that donald trump said that hillary clinton talked about today to show that she quoted him correctly that he really had said all the stuff she nailed him for.
the clinton campaign also had a second punch ready to land as their newest and most enthusiastic surrogate, senator elizabeth warren, simultaneously with that speech put out this video taking another swing at donald trump on the same topic. then they had senator elizabeth warren put out her first fund-raising e-mail for secretary clinton today. i don't know if hillary clinton is going to pick elizabeth warren as her running mate but the two of them unveiled a one-two coordinated tagteam attack on donald trump today in a way that clinton hasn't really ever done with anybody else. so, hm. but the trump campaign also started doing something new today. a day after firing their campaign manager, the trump campaign did get it together today to respond in realtime to secretary clinton's criticisms. unlike the last speech she did like this, today they did stuff. somebody who could mostly spell and use grammar took over the trump twitter account today
during the speech. sent out semi coherent boiler plate republican criticisms of republican that they posted throughout her whole speech. they were all from donald trump's account. i think maybe he was doing something else at the time. who knows, maybe it was him. but that sort of instant response, that didn't happen last time from mr. trump or from anybody associated with his campaign. the trump campaign sent out hillary clinton criticism prebuttal e-mails before she started her speech going after her on the subject of her speech, the economy. normal campaign stuff. the kind of stuff you see in a house race or a senate race or even at the most basic level in a normal presidential campaign. but all of that basic stuff is stuff the trump campaign was apparently incapable of until today they definitely didn't do any of that the last time she spent a whole speech ripping him to shreds. democrats are gleeful that the trump campaign is such a disaster so far. today made it seem like maybe that won't last. watch this space.
last night the u.s. senate voted on four measures meant to stop suspected terrorists and other people who shouldn't have guns from being able to get guns. the amendments ranged from republican ideas for doing very little to democratic measures that would do more than you can sell in washington these days. yeah, it was four different bills but the results as predictable as dropping four eggs from a two-story building. today though something was born unexpectedly that might actually have a chance. and that up likely story is next.
there are 19 people in the hospital that was wounded in the orlando massacre in a gay nightclub last weekend. four people in critical condition. they are still fighting for their lives. 49 were, of course, killed in the attack. the killer, twice popped in the fbi radar. once when he made pro terrorism threats at work. co-workers called the cops, and once when the fbi was investigationing ties, who went to syria and dieda a suicide bomber in syria. the fbi, for a time, put him on a terrorist watch list. by the time he went to by the handgun and the semi-automatic weapon. he was no longer on the list.
after orlando, the department of justice said it was looking into the possibility that fbi, could, at least, possibly be notified if someone on the terrorist watch list tried to buy a gun. they didn't say, congress keeps blocking that, they wanted the fbi to get pinged, notified, if someone they were watching tried to buy a gun. it does seem relevant information that fbi should v today, susan collins proposed making that call. that fbi could be notified there was an attempt to buy a guy from a terrorist watch list, or anything who had been on a watch
list in the last five years. therefore, the fbi would have been notified when he went to buy his gun, he had previously been on a watch list. >> the senate, has taken a pass on four gun measures this week. this one is taylored so specifically and narrowly, could it fare any better. this one, introduced by republican senator collins it is co-sponsored by jeff flake, and the republican from new hampshire. and lindsay graham, and a pro-gun senator from north dakota that is a sponsor. the independent senator from maine, angus king.
and senator pat toomey is not a co-sponsor of this measure, but he has notably said he will endorse the bill. without co-sponsoring it. that isn't a typical list of those sponsoring gun legislation in the u.s. senate. this could one go. a congressional reporter for "the washington post." >> that is a bipartisan gun bill. you don't see lists of co-sponsors like that does it have a prayer of passing? >> you have four republicans who have joined the effort so far. you quoted tomby, we assume that others will come on board. will enough of them come on board to get it across the finish line.
it is the senate, everything takes 60 votes, democrats are saying, they can get 40, they need to see collins pull 20 republicans along with her in order to stand a chance of getting it passed. what you are seeing, rank and file members saying, we want to see a compromise, a few more tweaks, something moves in the right direction, i hope it works. haven't seen the leaders of the parties say, go back this bill. that is what is the question. will they be able to get a good number? probably. >> from outside congress, as a lay observer, it feels to all of us watching, it will pass if the nra says it can pass and won't if the nra says it can't. is the nra determinative in whether or not something like this can get enough votes to pass. if so, what do you think how they reacted to it? >> they are strong. nra does not support collins' proposal. they said that.
the question is, do republicans say, you know what, we are going to break from the nra on this one. clearly, some of them are saying yes. i think earlier today, lindsay graham, who talks about how he owns an al-15 and a ton of other guns, directly addressed the nra to, my friends there, i am comfortable with the idea. this may inconvenience somebody who wants to purchase a firearm if they pop up on one of the terror watch lists that collins bill is focusing on, what i am not okay with, is an actual terrorist getting a firearm. we can correct the mistake if someone is mistakenly prevented from having a gun. but we can't correct if they buy a gun and does something like this. a pro-gun record, saying, this is where i am drawing a line. daring the other senators not to vote for the bill.
if anyone votes for the bill, they are betting that nobody on the list, no-fly list, and when we we talk about the collins measure, that nobody buys a gun and kills somebody. if it does, you will have something to answer for. there are true believers, for whom, it sent that nra has any sort of leverage over them, right? others who it might, they might swing. >> fascinating dynamics, unexpected, or at least territory we haven't been at before. thank you for helping us to understand it. we will be right back, stay with us. why do people put milk on cereal? why does your tummy go "grumbily, grumbily, grumbily"? no more questions for you! ooph, that milk in your cereal was messing with you, wasn't it? try lactaid, it's real milk,
without that annoying lactose. good, right? mmm, yeah. lactaid. the milk that doesn't mess with you. >> i'm alex trebek. if you're age 50 to 85, i have an important message about security. write down the number on your screen, so you can call when i finish. the lock i want to talk to you about isn't the one on your door. this is a lock for your life insurance, a rate lock, that guarantees your rate can never go up at any time,
for any reason. but be careful. many policies you see do not have one, but you can get a lifetime rate lock through the colonial penn program. call this number to learn more. this plan was designed with a rate lock for people on a fixed income who want affordable life insurance that's simple to get. coverage options for just $9.95 a month, less than 35 cents a day. act now and your rate will be locked in for life. it will never increase, guaranteed. this is lifelong coverage that can never be cancelled as long as you pay your premiums, guaranteed. and your acceptance is guaranteed, with no health questions. you cannot be turned down because of your health. call for your information kit and read about this rate lock for yourself. you'll also get a free gift with great information both are free, with no obligation, so don't miss out. call for information,
then decide. read about the 30 day, 100 percent money back guarantee. don't wait, call this number now. ♪ wahhhh... right. in. your. stomach! watch this!... >>yikes, that ice cream was messing with you, wasn't it? try lactaid, it's real ice cream, without that annoying lactose. lactaid. it's the milk that doesn't mess with you.
>> donald trump said he is going to lay out hillary clinton. 10:30 a.m., eastern. don't miss it. or do. your choice. it's wednesday, june 22nd. right now on "first look" the war of words over religion, money and an onslaught of political attacks. the rhetoric is heating up as the campaigns get hotter than the blazing western wildfires, and high temperatures. dangerous weather ahead today. over 60 million americans are at risk of severe super cells and more. also, new details in the investigation as the attorney general visits orlando and reports of bizarre plane tickets purchased by the shooter. plus the republicans are messing with fire in cleveland. the u.s. is schooled on the pitch. reunited statesing soldiers separated after battle. "first look" starts right now.