tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC January 2, 2017 7:00pm-8:01pm PST
how he's going to fit into the new democratic party. bernie sanders. the new democratic leader in the senate, chuck schumer, will be with us tomorrow night. i plan to ask him about what the democratic party is going to do in the age of trump. we will also, i think, have the aforementioned bernie sanders who has kindly agreed to come back even though old man winter kept him away. he's juggling our schedule so he can try to join us tomorrow to talk with me about my many questions about what he's going to do now. so, big night tomorrow night. chuck schumer and we think bernie sanders. we'll see you then. that does it for us tonight. see you again tomorrow. time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell." happy new year. >> i believe that'what we call a quorum in the senate. >> that's exactly right. >> to have the leader and bernie sanders. >> yes. >> going to be a great night. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you, rachel. a lot of people have been wondering this weekend whether donald trump committed treason this weekend. it's not the first time people have wondered about that online and probably not the last. we have the answer for you. we have the answer to that
question of did donald trump commit treason? and we have a model from the past of a presidential candidate in donald trump's situation dealing with a foreign country in a way that people suspect donald trump has been dealing with russia. all of that coming up. >> hacking is a very hard thing to prove so it could be somebody else. >> he needs to stop denigrating the intelligence committee. he's going it rely on them. >> and i also know things that other people don't know. you'll find out on tuesday or wednesday. >> is he holding it out there like some tease for a reality show? >> i think he does know things. that's why he's the president-elect. >> trump does not have any better information than president obama. >> putin has hacked into our elections, trying to undermine democracy all over the world. >> we will be working for much tougher sanctions against russia. >> trump, himself, praised vladimir putin for not responding in kind.
"great move on delay by v. putin. i always knew he was very smart." >> he has chosen to side with a murderous dictator, vladimir putin, over the patriots who serve our own intelligence services. >> my big fear right now is he doesn't appreciate that russia is a threat to this country. >> the hacking was an attack and we should be treated as such. hacking is a very hard thing to prove so it could be somebody else. >> he needs to stop talking this way. treason. it has come to that. treason. we now have to discuss treason because donald trump did something this weekend that we've never seen before. something that reasonable people think is treasonous. the word, shocking, has lost its meaning with donald trump but i was shocked on friday afternoon.
momentarily, anyway, when i saw what donald trump had done because although the word, shocking, has lost its meaning in america, the sensation still exists. we can still feel shock and if we lose that feeling, when donald trump does something shocking, that is when donald trump will have really finally won. he will have killed the outrage that is always the proper reaction to the outrageous. donald trump now knows that the way to erase the shock of anything he has said or done is to simply say something else. anything else. it doesn't have to be shocking. it just has to be new. and the news media will latch on to the newest thing donald trump has said because it's new. that's why you haven't heard much about what donald trump said three days ago. the news media has processed it and moved on. to this. >> i also know things that other
people don't know. >> of course, the president-elect should know things that other people don't know, but so far, there's no evidence that donald trump does. and then there's his refusal to know what everyone else knows. >> they notice any time anything wrong happens they like to say the russians -- she doesn't now if it's the russians doing the hacking. maybe there is no hacking. >> maybe there is no hacking. that's what he actually said about the stolen e-mails from hillary clinton's campaign chairman john podesta. does that mean that he thinks john podesta may have just forwarded his e-mails to wileaks? that is how desperate donald trump has been to deflect blame from vladimir putin and russia for these cyber attack that u.s. intelligence officials have concluded was launched by russia and directed by vladimir putin. after vladimir putin decided not to retaliate against the sanctions imposed by president obama and to delay any response
until after donald trump is sworn in, donald trump tweeted something that could be a federal crime. a very serious federal crime. and instantly, twitter was filled with speculation about that. did donald trump just commit treason? here's what he said. "great move on delay by v. putin. i always knew he was very smart." now, there is so much to react to in that tweet. but it was the treasonous sound of it that got most attention. but before we turn to that, just consider for a moment why does donald trump think that vladimir putin is very smart? does he think you have to be very smart to be a dictator who does not allow dissent and cr h crushes, imprisons or murders his opponents, invades a neighboring country, oppresses gay people, do you have to be smart to do that? in that tweet, the man who thinks he's the greatest negotiator in the world has said
vladimir putin is smart to wait to deal with the greatest negotiator in the world. he's smart to wait to deal with donald trump, instead of president obama. and it's easy to actually agree with that, but not in any way that's complimentary to donald trump. of course, it is smart for vladimir putin to deal with donald trump if, and only if, vladimir putin believes donald trump will be easier to deal with. because donald trump is a weaker negotiator. because donald trump is a pushover. or because vladimir putin sees donald trump as his very own rodeo clown. that is the only reason that it could be smart for vladimir putin to wait to deal with donald trump. there is no compliment to donald trump in that concept, but, of course, that's one of the many things that donald trump doesn't know. "great move on delay by v. putin. i always knew he was very
smart." jameel smith of mtv news tweeted "this is borderline treasonous. i don't know what putin has on this cat, but my lord, it must be incredible. god help us." another tweeted "i don't think trump committed treason in this tweet, but he's in the neighborhood." another tweeted "what's the threshold for treason?" and that is the question that donald trump's tweet poses. it is is very possible that donald trump will tweet and say and do other things especially in relation to russia that will provoke this question time and time again this year. what is the threshold for treason? everyone vaguely remembers something about providing aid and comfort to the enemy, was that tweet aid to the enemy? was it comforting to the enemy? surely vladimir putin was comforted by donald trump calling him very smart, but is vladimir putin the enemy? treason is the only crime that is specified in the constitution. it says "treason against the united states shall consist only
in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." that's it. treason is levying war against the united states or giving the enemies of the united states aid and comfort. the united states supreme court has come to interpret that sentence to mean giving aid and comfort to our enemies in a declared war. which is why no one has been charged with treason in the united states since the last time we were in a declared war, which was world war ii. without a declaration of war against russia, russia and vladimir putin would not fit definition of enemy in the constitution's definition of treason, and so, no, donald trump did not commit treason because it is virtually impossible to commit treason when we are not formally in a declared war with another country. that's why when cia officer alder james was caught selling
secrets to russia, he was not convicted of treason, he was convicted of violating the espionage act. which brings us to the logan act. which brings us to the logan act -- any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof with intent to influence the measures of conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof in relation to any disputes or controversies with the united states. that's what donald trump was doing with that tweet. he was clearly communicating with a foreign government and officer of a foreign government by name, v. putin, he intended to influence the conduct of that foreign government in a relation to a dispute with the united states. there is nothing in law that says the logan act does not apply to presidents-elect. the logan act is, in effect, the
one president at a time principle written into law. with donald trump, we frequently say we have never been here before. we've entered a new zone with in precedent. not this time. in 1968, when he was the republican nominee for president, richard nixon engaged, that the sitting president of the united states, lyndon johnson, privately said was treason. and now we have new proof published in "the new york times" yesterday of exactly what richard nixon did. in 1968, the vietnam war was raging out of control to the point that lyndon johnson decided not to run for re-election. humphrey was the democratic nominee. president johnson was december prat l desperately trying to get the south vietnamese we were supporting into peace talks with north vietnam. south vietnam's president was afraid lyndon johnson would not be tough enough with the north vietnamese so it was a struggle to get the people we were supporting with money and
already 30,000 american war dead to the peace talks. richard nixon got word to the south vietnamese to resist any peace negotiation. nixon feared any breakthrough in the peace negotiations would give the election to hubert humphrey. the broad outlines of this story have been known for years now, the names of the key players have been known, but with jack ferrell has discovered and reported in yesterday's "new york times" for the first time are nixon's own words about the scheme. the monkey wrench. jack ferrell has found nixon campaign aidhaldeman's nates about a conversation with nixon about the scheme, notes, "keep working on south vietnam any other way to monkey wrench it." as rumor spread that nixon might be interfering with the talks, he got very worried about this, knowing that it was a crime. he called president johnson.
and he lied to him. about what he was doing. when lyndon johnson confronted richard nixon about this. >> hello? >> mr. president, this is dic nixon. >> yes, dick. >> i want to letounow i got a report regarding yr call and i just went on"meet the press" and i said that -- on "meet the press" that i had given you my personal assurance that i would do everything possible to cooperate both before the election and if elected after the election and if you felt, the secretary of state felt, that anything would be useful that i could do, i would do it, that i felt han -- i felt saigon should come to the conference table, that you felt it was necessary to go there or go to paris, either one. i just wanted you to know that i
feel very, very strongly about this and any rumblings around about somebody trying to sabotage the saigon government's attitude certainly has no -- actually no credibility as far as i'm concerned. >> i'm very happy to hear that, dick, but that is taking place. >> "that is taking place," what president johnson said. he heard nixon's excuse, didn't accept it, told him it's taking place. he continued pressing him about what nixon called sabotage and richard nixon said this to president johnson. >> the point that i'm making is this, that my god, i would never do anything to encourage hanoi -- i mean, saigon not to come to the table, because that's what you got out of your bombing pause. good god, we want them over in
paris. we got to get them to paris or you can't have a peace. >> he mentioned their good friend, everett dirksen at the beginning of their conversation, republican senator. lyndon johnson privately said to leverett dirksen that this is treason. those were his words. this is treason. that's what the president thought. he said, i know. richard nixon did not just help prolong the war through the election season of 1968. he kept it going for five years as president costing the united states another 28,000 lives. joining us now, john farrell, the author of the upcoming book, "richard nixon the life." jack, thank you very much for joining us tonight. your first interview about this discoverry which you just published. first of all, when's the book coming out? we can't wait. >> march 28th. >> march 28th. okay. i'm going to be at the bookstore. so this -- you have many discoveries in the haldeman
notes. i'd like to get to some more of them. i'd like to concentrate on this for the moment and that feeling in washington by the president, leverett dirksen, by the people who discovered the evidence about this at the time, of feeling that this was treason. they had never witnessed anything like this. >> there's always been -- in american elections with foreign affairs and nixon, himself, had been on the losing end in 1960 when they delayed the release of some captured american pilots in order to keep nixon/eisenhower, the eisenhower ticket a boost in the election against john kennedy. so he also knew in 1966, lyndon johnson had come up with an october surprise in the off-year elections and he was very suspicious that this was being played on him again and so he took the steps to prevent it by reaching out through his intermediaries to the south
vietnamese government. >> and you make the point in your "new york times" report about this that this does look like a violation of the logan act. >> as far as i read the logan act, it sounds like this fits it to a "t." the problem with the logan act is only one person has ever been indicted for it and that person's prosecution was dropped. so it runs against some of the tenets of the 1st amendment. it's been a difficult law to apply. it gets trotted out and thrown about in charges and countercharges but it's more of a warning. the best that can be said, the least that can be said, is what henry kissinger said, if nixon did this, it was highly improper and nixon, himself, in his interviews with david frost said i would never do that, that would be a terrible thing to do. definitely an element of self-consciousness on nixon's
side. >> henry kissinger is one of the people communicating to nixing about the progress being made in the peace talks. >> yeah. actually the haldeman notes i found doing the work on the book was exonerating to kissinger because kissinger's advice even while he's tipping nixon off is to sit tight, we don't though exactly what's going to happen, don't know the meaning of this, we know there's a breakthrough you could be caught unaware of. don't go out too far on a limb. nixon thoook it just the opposi, went roaring out on a limb telling bob haldeman and other contacts revealed in the notes to pressure south vietnam into what he said holding firm his main envoy, madam chennault, was captured on an fbi wiretap using almost those exact words to the south vietnamese ambassador in washington. >> at some point lyndon johnson was on to this and started
putting some surveillance on some of the people they thought were involved in communicating with the vietnamese. >> yeah, the chain is now -- with these notes the chain is pretty much complete from nixon to haldeman and john mitchell to anna chenault to the south vietnamese ambassador and saigon. the great question that still is out there is how much did this -- how much did this influence the south vietnamese government which was having its own internal political battles and so how great a chance was lost? the saddest thing that i found was a note in the lyndon johnson library from his national security adviser which said almost mournfully to lyndon johnson, this is the best chance we've had since 1961 to get out of this mess. this has been very painful. i'm here with your generals. we think we should go ahead, we think with determination we can make this work. so we can look back now and say, boy, those north vietnamese were incredibly stubborn, this was never going to happen, but at the time, johnson and his
advisers believed this was -- this was more than viable. they thought this was a potential breakthrough. >> and jack, a final point here. why didn't lyndon johnson reveal publicly what he knew about this before the election? >> they had a long discussion about that. some of his aides urged him to. but there were two reasons. the more nefarious reasons was that nixon had been -- not nixon, but his envoys had been wiretapped and eavesdropped and followed around and would look bad for the american president to use the fbi in the late stages of a campaign. but the practical reason was as clark clifford told him in this 11th-hour meeting about this when they made the decision not to, was that we really don't know whether nixon was personally directing this. and that's what the haldeman notes show is nixon was personally giving these orders. >> and jack, i imagine you've been having some sensations of parallels to what we've been seeing this year. some democrats complaining that president obama should have come out more strongly with what they found out about the russian
hacking. about vladimir putin's involvement. and a similar reluctance on the president's part about just how political this might be perceived to be. >> yeah. and there are certainly echos, there was a great picture in "the new york times" a few weeks back. it was a picture of one of the computer sevenervers that had b hacked standing next to a file cabinet from the democratic national committee broken into during the watergate ex kcavatkn the 1970s. this idea of flirting with the enemy on the eve of an election is -- it's stunning in some ways and in other ways it's scary. >> john farrell, the book is "richard nixon a life" coming out march, say it again? >> march 28th. >> march 28th. we'll be at the bookstore. jack, thank you very much for joining us with this. really appreciate it. >> my pleasure.
breaking trump transition now. nbc news has confirmed that donald trump will nominate lawyer robert lithizer, he served as the u.s. deputy trade administrator under ronald reagan whose trade policies were exactly the opposite of everything donald trump has announced to be his own trade policies. all of the trade agreements being complained about now were born during the reagan era including nafta. we'll be right back. (burke) and we covered it, february third, twenty-sixteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ the great north calls >>announout for heroes.waits...
we have breaking news. social media's been blowing up with photos and videos of extremely long customs lines at several major u.s. airports tonight. u.s. customs and border protection experienced a nationwide computer system outage forcing international travelers across the country to be processed by hand. stephanie is a correspondent for nbc 6 in south florida. she's live at miami international airport. stephanie, what's the situation there?
>> reporter: well, basically we're here in a section of the airport where the international arrivals come through, so we're kind of zooming into the area. we've been keeping an eye sort of on the door behind the glass here just slightly out of the camera's view. that's where it's all going down. some images we've been able to get our hands on from travelers taking to twitter, pictures that have been sent to us. really showing just seas and seas of people, people wait and waiting. what we've heard from travelers we've spoken to tonight who have actually been able to make it through is the waits are anywhere from two to three hours. now, according to customs and border protection, they're calling this some sort of a problem, some sort of power outage. a technical issue with their processing system. they say that is what is affecting sort of the flow of being able to clear people and creating all this backlog. they're saying it's an issue across the country. many terms of miami international airport, airport officials are telling us there's been about more than 30 flights
and that's since 6:00 p.m., since the problem erupted, affected by all this. you know, if travelers are coming through and stopping here in miami, it's one thing, but we've spoken to a lot of travelers that were connecting through miami so now they've missed their flights to connect to their final destinations. that's really created a problem. a lot of frustration in this airport tonight. lawrence? >> nbc 6's stephanie bertini, thank you very much for joining us live from miami. really appreciate it. thank you. coming up next, president obama coaching the democrats on how to deal with donald trump. the microsoft cloud helps us stay connected. the microsoft cloud offers infinite scalability. the microsoft cloud helps our
customers get up and running, anywhere in the planet. wherever there's a phone, you've got a bank, and we could never do that before. the cloud gave us a single platform to reach across our entire organization. it helps us communicate better. we use the microsoft cloud's advanced analytics tools to track down cybercriminals. this cloud helps transform business. this is the microsoft cloud. there's a more enjoyable way to get your fiber. hey, it's the phillips' lady! try these delicious phillips' fiber good gummies, a good source of fiber to help support regularity. mmm...these are great! my work here is done. phillips', the tasty side of fiber. 115th congress will be sworn
in tomorrow and the trump resistance will officially begin on one side of the aisle. president obama will go to capitol hill on wednesday to talk with democrats about how to protect his landmark health care law. the affordable care act. against a republican-led congress that promises to repeal it. and a president who promises to sign that repeal. next tuesday, president obama will go to chicago and give a farewell address where he will, "offer some thoughts on where we all go from here." th at his new year's eve party at mar-a-lago, donald trump told his guests what he will do when he takes office. >> taxes are coming down. regulations are coming off. we're going to get rid of obamacare. we're going to have strong borders so that when people come into the country, they're going to come into the country legally. which is the way we want it.
we will build the wall. you know that. we'll build a wall. >> joining us now, michael dantonio, pulitzer prize winning writer, author of "consequential president: the legacy of barack obama" and karine jean-pierre for moveon.org. karine, the striking thing to me in that video, unusual for a republican audience, a rich republican audience which was that group, they got applause for taxes going down but he brought the house down by saying we're going to get rid of obamacare. that got the biggest applause. not one person in the room has interacted with obamacare in any way. not one of them. they're all cheering for the removal of health insurance from millions of people who can't ain order it and that was their biggest cheer of the night. and it seems the pressure is on donald trump to deliver on that repeal. >> no, that's exactly right,
lawrence, and don't forget, i actually don't know if it's been really reported that much, is that he also made about $500,000 off of that new year's eve event. his trump organization did. and so the thing, too, to look at for the next couple of weeks is also how is the -- how are the republicans going to deal with donald trump? because a lot of donald trump's rhetoric will bump against what mitch mcconnell and paul ryan have listed, that long list of policy ideas that they've had for very far-right ideas that they've had for many, many years, because if we look at, in particular, medicare and also social security, donald trump has said during the campaign, i don't want to touch those. but that's pretty much on the list for mcconnell and paul ryan. so we'll see how that goes, but i think at the end of the day, mitch mcconnell and paul ryan will certainly trump trump's
fake populism that he played during the 18 months of his campaign. >> michael, your new book, "consequential president: the legacy of barack obama," first of all, a quick outline of what you think is the essence of the consequential president, his achievements, and then also what you now see as the risk to his legacy with a trump presidency. >> well, i think the theme of hope that he started with in 2007, 2008, is really the capstone of his legacy. when you look around the world, it's not just americans who took hope from his election. and from his dignified and decent presidency. it's people all over the world who saw america as something different than it was under george bush. the fact that a man named barack hussein obama, an african-american man, could be elected in the united states of america to the highest office, was inspiring to all. you know, and i think that's why there were hundreds of thousands of people in grant park cheering
his election on the night of on the night of his election. this is the image people are going to carry forward. you look at all of his accomplishments in the very first year. saving the economy. pursuing health care. saving the auto industry. there are so many things he accomplished so quickly that this legacy, you know, it can't be erased by a single president trump and it can't be erased by a single congress. >> so, karine in microlhael's v the legacy is not simply the affordable care act which i believe has many more procedural hurdles that it will have to get over to be repealed than the republicans are acknowledging. there's no version of this where you can repeal it in one day. that isn't legislatively possible. >> no, that's exactly right. . it is going to be very difficult. i mean, in many ways the republicans are like the dog that caught the car on this one. they had six years to actually
work with democrats. i mean, democrats have said the president, himself, even hillary clinton on the campaign trail said, hey, you know, it needs to be fixed and even with the minor fixes the past six years, the republicans refused to do it and so now they're put in a situation where millions and millions of americans who rely on this could be in harm's way because they're so stuck to their partisan idea of repealing obamacare. >> ka arine jean-pierre, thanks for joining us tonight. appreciate it. >> thank you. ming up next, when do you call a lie a lie? when you are reporting on donald trump. what shall we call you? tom! name it tom! studies show that toms have the highest average earning potential over their professional lifetime. see? uh, it's a girl. congratulations! two of my girls are toms. i work for ally, finances are my thing. you know, i'm gonna go give birth real quick and then we'll talk, ok? nice baby. let's go. here comes tom #5!
nothing, stops us from doing right by our customers. ally. do it right. whoo! look out. ally. do it right. has been a struggle. i considered all my options with my doctor, who recommended once-daily toujeo®. now i'm on the path to better blood sugar control. toujeo® is a long-acting insulin from the makers of lantus®. it releases slowly, providing consistent insulin levels for a full 24 hours, proven full 24-hour blood sugar control, and significant a1c reduction. and along with toujeo®, i'm eating better and moving more. toujeo® is a long-acting, man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. allergic reaction may occur and may be life threatening. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens, even if the needle has been changed. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be serious and life threatening.
it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily while using toujeo®. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose or type of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor if you take other medicines and about all your medical conditions. insulins, including toujeo®, in combination with tzds (thiazolidinediones) may cause serious side effects like heart failure that can lead to death, even if you've never had heart failure before. don't dilute or mix toujeo® with other insulins or solutions as it may not work as intended and you may lose blood sugar control, which could be serious. toujeo® helps me stay on track with my blood sugar. ask your doctor about toujeo®. yeahashtag "stuffy nose."old. hashtag "no sleep." i got it. hashtag "mouthbreather." yep. we've got a mouthbreather. well, just put on a breathe right strip and ... pow! it instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. so you can breathe ... and sleep.
i watched when the world trade center came tumbling down and i watched in jersey city, new jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. >> lie? not a lie? donald trump has inspired a debate about lying that has been going on for over a year. his lies during the presidential campaign including the lie that thousands of muslims in new jersey cheered on 9/11 have been a central part of that debate, how can journalists fairly describe these statements, what should they call them? according to an analysis by politico in september, donald trump averaged about one falsehood every 3 minutes and 15 seconds over a 5-day period over
the campaign. "the new york times" used the word, lie, for the first time in september to describe donald trump's birther statements. yesterday, "wall street journal" editor in chief, gerard baker was asked by chuck todd on "meet the press" whether he is comfortable using the word, lie, to describe an outright falsehood by donald trump and he said this. >> i'd be careful about using the word, lie. lie implies much more than just saying something that's false. it implies a deliberate intent to mislead. i think it's perfect -- when donald trump says thousands of people were on the rooftops of new jersey on 9/11 celebrating, thousands of muslims were there celebrating, i think it's right to investigate that claim, to report what we found which is that nobody found any evidence of that whatsoever, and to say that. i don't -- i think it's then up to the readers to make up their own mind to say this is what donald truays, this is what a reliable trustworthy news organization reports and you know what, i don't think that's true i think if you start ascribing a
moral intent, as it were, to someone by saying that they've lied, i think you run the risk that you look like you are being -- you're not being objective. >> joining us now, jonathan, msnbc political analyst, and columnist from the "daily beast." back with us, michael d'antonio. your verdict on the 9/11 thousands of muslims celebrating in nrew jersey. do you call it a lie? if not, what do you call it? >> untrue and a falsehood. i'm not sure it's a lie because in trump's fantasy mind, he might have believed it. he believes all kinds of conspiracy theories, he might have read it online somewhere. and believed a lie, repeated a lie, but i think a lie is more like when he said, you know, hillary clinton wants to abolish the 2nd amendment. he knows it's a lie he's telling o r says i can't release my
taxes because i'm under audit. he knows that's a lie. there are certain more clear-cut lies. we don't want to call every falsehood that comes out of his mouth a lie or we'd be going liar, lie e, liar all day long and debase the currency of calling him to account. what i really objected to about what baker said, he said at the risk of losing our impression of objectivity, he has put objectivity and balance at the very top of journalistic values and at the top of our values, at the top our hierarchy of values is truth. balance and objectivity are a little further down below truth and accuracy. and we -- you know, the constitution didn't protect the right to be objective. it -- there was no objective press in those days. it was the right to challenge and hold the government accountable with the truth, and i think we've lost sight of that in the business. >> but michael, could you hear baker to be saying about the
objectivity, the reason why i want to preserve the image of objectivity is so that i can get you to believe that what i'm trafficking in here at this newspaper is truth? >> well, and this is the trap that trump puts everybody in. so he demands that we adhere to a higher standard than -- >> yes. >> -- he'll follow so he'll lie and he does lie. i mean, i would sort of feel like the second time he says it, once he's been corrected about the muslims on buildings, rooftop s celebrating, then it a lie. i think what he said about abolishing the 2nd amendment -- >> even if you think it's a lie, agree it's a lie, as an editor, do you think journalists can overuse it to the point where lie becomes an effective term? >> oh, yes. we do need to assert our institutional institutional -- >> use it accurately? you lose your reader, they don't trust you. donald has us all lumped in to
this untrustworthy world where nobody is certain of anything then what institution can the public trust? >> you spent a lot of time with him up close doing the book. you must have had moments where you thought this is lie, this is a fantasy. >> oh, yeah. >> he's just winging it, might think it's true, might not. >> he's either diluted or believes a conspiracy theory, he's a fan of conspiracy theories or likes to assert things as if they should be true and if he says it often enough, it will become true. >> let me give you an example of something that's also 9 /11, see what we think about this in terms of lie. let's listen to this first one from the republican debate in february. >> how did he keep us safe when the world trade center -- the world -- excuse me. i lost hundreds of friends. >> so that's -- he lost hundreds of friends on 9/11.
the next morning on "meet the press." listen to how he said the same thing. >> i was there. i love many, many friends in that tragedy. worst tragedy in the history of the country. worst than pearl harbor naer. they attacked civilians -- >> hundreds of friends in less than 12 hours became many, many friends. here's the important thing. he never said it again. on the night of the debate when he said it, i tweeted immediately that he was lying. in fact, no one lost hundreds of friends on 9/11. the math of that tragedy is such. he never went to a single 9/11 funeral. i mean, there couldn't have been anything in his wildest imagination that was true about that when he said it, could there? >> no. but there isn't about a lot of things that come out of his mouth. what we need to develop, lawrence, are a new set of journalistic conventions and phrases to indicate -- >> yeah. >> -- so we need to say routinely his lie is so inflammatory that the president's statement was unsubstantiated. the president's statement was
unfounded. president's statement was false. >> is untrue okay? is that something -- >> untrue is a good word also. these are ways that are more digestible for the public to indicate that the president is speaking with a fork tongue. >> i think to say there's never been any evidence offered to support the president's claim. >> right. >> there's so many ways to get at this that also indicates we've done our due diligence. >> okay. on twitter, i'm sticking with lie because it's three characters. it's what i got to do. jonathan alter, michael d'antonio, thank you both for joining us. i really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. coming up, the most surprising moment of the nfl season happened yesterday and it had nothing to do with football.
why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed anthe urinary symptoms of h. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours.
if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. [bullfighting music] [burke] billy-goat ruffians. seen it. covered it. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ nuit's earned in every wash... earned overnight. ... and re-earned every day. tide. america's number one detergent. two people protesting the dakota pipeline on climbed into the rafters during the minnesota vikings game on sunday dangling from ropes high above the
playing field. protesters unraveled a large banner that said "u.s. bank divest, no dapl." the protesters displayed the banner in the second quarter and police did not attempt to remove them. the banner stayed up until the game was over. the protesters were then arrested. a statement released by the protesters said that "u.s. bank has given $175 million line of credit to energy transfer partners, the parent company of the pipeline. goes on to say "january 1st marks the original deadline for the completion of the pipeline. today the pipeline is still incomplete. investors have a right to withdraw business contracts from the project and we urge them to do so." president obama blocked construction of the pipeline on december 4th. protesters bo protesters worry president-elect trump could reverse that order so they're focusing on companies financing the pipeline. some companies have divested. "guardian" newspaper reports "in november the largest bank in
norway, dnb, announced it had sold its assets in the pipeline and sold $23.8 million worth of shares invested in companies behind the pipeline. earlier in december, the swedish bank nordea said it would not back the pipeline if the corporation violated the demands of the standing rock sioux tribe." u.s. bank is not commenting on whether it will divest. in a statement to "the last word," standing rock sioux tribe chairman said "oil prices have dropped and production from the bakken fields have declined significantly. this means on top of everything else, there is no economic rationale to increase the regional pipeline capacity. it is simply the pipeline company's greed." he continues "while we are not directly associated with all of the divestment protests, the standing rock sioux tribe agrees with the push to get more people to divest from the dakota access pipeline.
coming up, malcolm nantz reacts to the latest terrorist attack in turkey and donald trump's comments about it. i mess around in the garage. i want to pay more to file my taxes. i want my tax software to charge me at the last second. paying $60 to file my taxes was the highlight of my day. and you just saw footage of me flipping burgers. want to charge me extra to itemize my deductions? no problem. i literally have too much money. said no one ever. file for free with credit karma tax.
free to start, free to finish. creditkarma.com/tax. a big tax company needs that $50 way more than me. does your mouthg prescripoften feel dry?s, a dry mouth can cause cavities and bad breath. over 400 medications can cause a dry mouth. that's why there's biotene. biotene can provide soothing dry mouth relief. and it keeps your mouth refreshed too. remember while your medication is doing you good, a dry mouth isn't. biotene, for people who suffer from dry mouth symptoms. for over 100 years like kraft has,cious natural cheese you learn a lot about people's tastes. honey, what do you want for dinner tonight? oh, whatever you're making. cheesy chipotle pork quesadillas? mmmm... ravioli lasagna bake? yeah, i don't know... grilled white chicken... grab something rich, sharp and creamy. triple cheddar stuffed sliders. sold!
we have more breaking news about the problem at u.s. airports tonight. u.s. customs and border protection says the breakdown of its computers systems has been fixed. all systems are back online and they are processing travelers now as quickly as possible. it will still be a long wait, but your loved ones will be home soon. we'll be right back. ng one of te largest broadband companies in the country. after expanding our fiber network coast to coast. these are the places we call home. we are centurylink. we believe in the power of the digital world. the power to connect. and that's what drives us everyday.
in turkey carrying out raids in istanbul as part of the investigation of the terror attack in the early hours of new year's eve. officials released this picture of the suspect in that attack who they say carried out a mass shooting at a well known nightclub. 39 people were kill and dozens others injured. turkish government have found or believed to be the gunman's fingerprint and police are close to identifying him. today, isis made a rare move and
claimed responsibility for the shooting. calling the gunman a soldier of the caliphate. and the attack revenge for turkish military involvement in syria. joining us now, malcolm nance, msnbc counterterrorism and intelligence analyst. malcolm, your reaction to what happened over the weekend and donald trump's comments about it. >> well first off, turkey has suffered many, many terrorist attacks over the last year. which have killed almost 200 of its citizens. most notably, the attacks in ankara at the airport -- i'm sorry, istanbul at the airport where they lost almost 50 people, by the same type of people, nationals who were members of the islamic state terrorist group. that being said, it is virtually impossible for intelligence, even with advanced intelligence and some knowledge of the plot, which is appears there were indicators of, to stop every act of terrorism.
donald trump's comment just, again, reveals his naivety. there's no way you can consta constantly promise you're going to take care of this when you can't get into the mind of a single individual who could be inspired to attack. >> so he sees something like this, as you say, there's a history to this in turkey, a repetition to it. we -- what assets, what could we bring to turkey following donald trump's logic that could somehow affect the future of this kind of thing in turkey? >> well, technically, we've already done possibly the maximum that we could do in terms of bringing cooperation, technical intelligence, you know, using strategic collection assets, even tactical collection assets that are on the ground which may have given the american intelligence agencies up to two weeks' warning that this attack was going to occur.
it appears that there's reports that they had warned the owner of the reina nightclub that that facility would be attacked but you can't choose the place and the time of the terrorist leader who just decides to do it on a random night. if you don't actually heed that warning or put out enough security. so for the most part, we are doing maximum effort. now, possibly trump could, you know, get into a relationship with erdogan and provide more on-the-ground intelligence assets but that wouldn't go over well certainly politically and erdogan, himself, he has his own political games that he's playing internally that prohibit more united states participation. >> what do you expect turkey's reaction to be? >> well, turkey's reaction is going to be -- is pretty predictable, if we're going to watch the trend they've had over the last year. since the coup detat, we expect turkey is going to ignore the islamic state or isis claim that they carried out this terrorist
attack and use it to bash their opponents in the guhelinis example, the exile who lives in pennsylvania and by doing that, they'll further of tstracize th turkish people and give the islamic state an opportunity to attack again. >> malcolm nance, preeshappreci. msnbc's live coverage continues now into the "11th hour." tonighcould donald trump be headed for his first showdown with republicans in congress before he even takes the oath of office? also, what does donald trump know that other people don't know about hacking? and whether russia was involved? and a statesman weighs in tonight on the dangers of president-elect trump's constant praise for vladimir putin. the "11th hour" begins now. happy new year, i'mic