tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC January 12, 2017 7:00pm-8:01pm PST
forever for heaven's sake. it is the old guy coming out and new guy coming in. there's nothing wrong with that. charlie bratman will be nbc's newest inaugural commentator. that is the best thing in the world. congratulations, sir. that does it for us. see you tomorrow. now time for last call with lawrence o'donnell. >> rachel, next time i get a cold, charlie bratman. >> yes, sir bp roger that. >> good evening, charlie. it'll be one of those. >> thank, lawrence. >> thank one rachel. a day of breaking fbi news. breaking news about what the fbi told donald trump and breaking news about what a new investigation of the fbi director himself. a new investigation about why he made public further investigation of hillary clinton's e-mails days before the election. an election that discovered nothing. we will get to all of that but
first donald trump's poll numberes have been ignored this week because so much other news pushed them out of the way. but those poll numbers tell you very clearly that you are not alone. >> fbi director james comey took trump aside and spoke with him one on one about the existence of the unverified allegations against him. >> he has said that he is not aware of that. >> okay. >> that concerns me. >> that's not true. >> what is not true? that i'm concerned? >> no, that i see. >> okay. i assure you. >> as you know, i have a no conflict situation because i'm president. >> can we just take a second here, guyes. like how is all of this real? >> don't be rude. >> i don't think he's done enough and he may sink in the swamp. >> the best vice president america's ever had, mr. joe biden. >> the vp with the highest civilian honor, medal of freedom. >> this also gives the internet one last chance to talk about
our bromance. >> mr. president, there's not one single solitary ounce of entitlement in you. >> we don't make good deals any more. >> yeah, like how we traded obama for the world's largest troll doll. terrible deal. terrible. >> you are not alone. you are not alone if you are tired of what kellyanne conway tries to get way with in her interviews. it turns out the fbi or someone in the fbi or intelligence community who knows what the fbi director has said to donald trump is tired of what the trump staff usually in the person of kellyanne conway tries to get away with. >> we should be concerned that intelligence officials leaked to the press and won't go and tell the president-elect or president of the united states himself now, mr. obama, what the information is. they would rather go tell the
press. >> but the report was that the -- the press report was about them -- >> an allegation -- >> about them going to the president. >> and says they never briefed him on it. they appended two payes to the bottom of his -- >> i fwlef said they did brief him on it. >> he has said he is notware of it. >> okay, that concerns me. >> tonight, nbc news has confirmed that fbi director james comey took mr. trump aside and spoke to him one on one about the existence of verification against him and told him the summary of claim was included on an addendum to the top secret report. that is a direct smackdown of kellyanne conway and what she has been saying this week. and the sources for that report, but what the fbi director told donald trump are, quote, multiple high level intelligence sources. you are not alone. multiple high level intelligence sources have decided that
they're tired of donald trump or kellyanne conway lying about them. they aren't going to take it any more. you're not alone. you're not alone as you watch the end of one presidency and the shaping of another in confirmation hearings this week and you worry about who is taking over this government. you are not alone if you disapprove of the individuals donald trump has nominated to be part of his cabinet. that was a question in a poll released this week that chose 40% disapprove of donald trump's cabinet choices. only 30% approve. and you are not alone if you disapprove of the nomination of jeff sessions to be the next of the united states. you're not alone if you disapprove of rex tillerson becoming the next secretary of state. least approved of secretary of state in history of confirmation hearings. 35% disapprove of rex tillerson of secretary of state. only 23% approve. not even a majority of
republicans approve of rex tillerson as secretary of state. and that poll was completed before rex tillerson's testimony in which he said this when asked about the possibility of creating a government registry of all muslims in the united states. >> do you support creating a national registry for american muslims? >> i would need to have a lot more information around how such an approach would even be constructed. and if it were a tool, for vetting, it probably extends to other people as well. other groups that are threats. to the u.s. but that's a -- it would just require me much more information around how that would even be approached. >> all the information he needs is in the constitution. a secretary of state who doesn't know that a government registry of every member after religion is unconstitutional. rex tillerson may be a well
informed businessman but he is the least informed nominee ever questioned in a confirmation hearing for second of state. most secretaries of state, in our history, didn't have confirmation hearings. confirmation hearings became common only during the tell vaj age. the first we've seen is dean hatcherson in 1949. founding fathers didn't think confirmation hearings were necessary because of course cabinet members would be chosen from a group of men, a small group of men and only men, so well known to the senate that no one would have any questions about them. no nominee for secretary of state has been less well known to the senate than rex tillerson and so the least experienced secretary of state in history has been nominated to advise the least experienced president in history, a president the country is not looking forward to. according to the most recent quinnipiac poll. you are not alone if you are not at all confident that donald trump will make things better for you or your family. that's what 35% of the people
said in the quinnipiac poll. another 18% said they were not confident. that's majority saying they are not confident about donald trump and his presidency making things better. only 17% were very confident and 277% some what confident. you are not alone if you feel donald trump will do more to divide the country than unite the country 54% believe donald trump will do more to divide the country. this quinnipiac poll that i'm reporting to you is a truly amazing and unprecedented poll for an incoming president. no incoming president has ever polled worse than donald trump. this would be the biggest news item of the week or one of the biggest news items of the week if this week had not been filled with president obama's emowingal and eloquent farewell address and donald trump's disjointed and angry press conference about leaks and donald trump being briefed by the fbi director on the unproven allegations on him and his allegations of vladimir
putin floating around washington and news media for months. a very, very big "newsweek." so the most important poll since election night has been ignored. it's a poll that changes your understanding of the country you live in. and who is living here with you? if you've wondered about how trump voters relate to donald trump, you should wonder about that less because many of them don't relate to donald trump. so the question of, do you feel that donald trump is someone you can relate to, 68% said no. 35% of republicans said no. 61% of men said they cannot relate it donald trump. 74% of women said no they cannot relate it donald trump. that is the country you live in. would you say that donald trump is level-headed? 62% said no. 56% of men said no. 67% of women said no. that was before this happened. >> president-elect, since you are attacking our news
is your opinion of donald trump favorable or unfavorable? only 37% say favorable. that has dropped sin the last quinnipiac poll on november 27 where donald trump had 44% favorable and 46% unfavorable. donald trump's numbers are going down. and his reckless tweeting in which he congratulates vladimir putin for being smart is not helping. 64% of voters say donald trump should close his twitter account. do you think donald trump will be a better president than president obama? 45% say he will be worse. only 34% say he will be better. that is less than the percentage of the vote that donald trump won on election night. do you think donald trump will be a great president? a good president? a not so good president? or a bad president? bad. bad got more responses than any other choice. 32% believe donald trump will be a bad president. 20% believe he will be not so good. 30% think he will be good. only 12% think he will be great.
only 12%. i know it looked like everyone at the trump rallies believe he will be a great president, but apparently not. a majority believes donald trump will be bad or not so good as president. if you would like to see president obama continue to speak out on national issues after he leaves office, you are not alone. 50% say they would like to see that. 46% say no. 12% of republicans would like to see president obama continue to speak out on national issues. and that poll was completed the night before president obama's farewell address. >> for now, whether you are young or whether you're young at heart, i do have one final ask of you as your president. the same thing i asked when you took a chance on me eight years ago. i'm asking you to believe. not in my ability to bring about
change, but in yours. >> if you are on the losing end on election night, it might have felt like you lost everything. but you didn't. you lost one election. you did not lose your country. you live in a country that likes president obama more than donald trump. a country that relates to president obama more than donald trump. a country that wants to hear more from president obama and less from donald trump especially on twitter. and if you are encouraged or discouraged by the results of this poll, you are not alone. democrats in congress will be encouraged in their resistance to donald trump and republicans in congress will be discouraged by this poll. a president's persuasive power with congress with his own party in congress is entirely dependent on his standing in the polls. and donald trump is losing support in the polls since election night. he will take the oath of office next week. a weaker politician than he was on election night. the donald trump in this poll is
not the person america will want to trust with rewriting health care policy in this country. this poll tells us that those of you watching the inauguration next week who believe that donald trump is not level-headed, does not care about you, and is not honest are not alone. it tells us you are the majority. this is as much your country as it has ever been. joining us now, joan walsh, national correspondent of the nation on political analyst and charlie sykes editor and chief an msnbc contributor. joan, this poll, when i was reading it when it came out on tuesday was absolutely stunning. overwhelmed with news since then. >> right. >> this is a picture that has been lost to the news media especially news media that wants to spend a lot of time wondering what democrats did wrong. how they have to change. what a genius donald trump was to win. >> big message election. >> yeah. all this to consider.
and also within this discussion we have what happened with the fbi now tonight revealing that yes, director comey took donald trump aside one on one told him exactly -- >> right and revealing that once again he and kellyanne conway lied about it. that he was actually briefed. yeah. lawrence on the one hand, obviously this is extraordinary. barack obama won 51% of the vote, just over 50%, he went to 69% the day before inauguration. this is when people fall in love with their president. it has always been him. he usually makes pretty main treatment appointments. occasionally one or two are controversial. and people bask in the feeling that okay we have turned the page. we like these rituals. republicans weren't so happy but even some republicans proved to him. this is really dangerous. and we should also point out that donald trump got a bump from, in his first few weeks,
right? his favorable rating went over 50% for a few days. but then he started tweeting again. we saw his appointments and the general just mayhem of this administration became clearer and clearer. so you know, on the other hand, a lot of people who didn't trust him, dpt like him, didn't approve of him at the last minute, pulled the lever for him. and we have to remember that. that's where, you know, many democrats, myself included, think that the comey intervention made such a difference. you see hillary clinton's poll going down a slide. so you know, there's just a lot to take in. but he's tanking before he is taking office. >> charlie, transition period is the easiest period in a president's life. it is the period where there is nothing at stake. i can't think of anybody who really got anything wrong during that period. i mean, when was there ever an angry outburs bait president-elect for example at a press conference. >> and we've never add president
coming into office with so many questions. you know, facing about his abilities, about russia, about his ethics, all those things. he has one job. just one job, which is to reassure nervous americans, to reassure the public. including p em who pull the lever for him because he wasn't hillary clinton and he is apparently not interested in doing that. again, i don't know how many times we have to say that but donald trump is not going to be pivoting. by the way, i i did think he beat the media yesterday. but on the other hand his absolute unwillingness to become president bl or modify his behavior. but don't, by the way, don't gloss over what he is accomplishing. how i hijacked the concept of fake news, turned it on its head, drained that of all meaning whatsoever. if he can't brow beat the media he will delegitmize them. it is a very, very ugly transition period. >> but joan, the basis this poll shows is not enough.
>> the basis is very small and the base will love it but other people will be frightened. charlie, i don't know exactly what you mean by he beat the media but he beat them with a stick maybe. but i don't know that he beat them. i think he shocked them. i think there are a lot of reporters who simply didn't know how to respond. i would have liked to have seen even more solidarity with jim acosta. >> oh, no. i agree. and i don't think they fully grasped what they were up against. what i meant is that i thought buzz feed handed him the stick that he needed to do to turn all of that around. with the unsubstantiated allegations. this was a gift to him. i think the media has to understand they are facing something they never faced before. their poll ratings are just slightly above hemorrhoids right now. donald trump knows he can beat on the media. he can humiliate the media. discredit the media and not pay a significant political price at least for now with the base
which, as you point out, is not the whole electorate. >> one price he is paying in this poll, john, is the view of his character and personality. and that he is not stable, not calm. all the things that people want in a president. >> right. >> i mean, the early morning and late night tweets that picking a fight with meryl streep. we could just sit here and mention them for your whole hour. >> can't keep up. >> it is hard to keep up. but i think he is really showing people that he is not ready for this. he also feels -- he feels to me rattled by it. he has a big ego. but he doesn't feel prepared. that nonsense that, this is the least of his press conference, but i want to bring it up anyway. the nonsense he spewed about repealing obamacare and getting something bigger or better and roughly simultaneously, he waet no meat on the bones of his understanding of health policy. since he was elected. he doesn't know what they are doing over in the capital and it
is just becoming clearer to people he is not driving this train. >> but he is bullying and intimidating. >> i'm wondering, as we have always wondered, where is their breaking point? and for example if the promises aren't delivered on obamacare, is that a a breaking point for trump supporters? >> that's going to be a big one. but also as your poll numbers do point out, there are a lot of people who again voted for donald trump because it with a a binary choice because they were voting against hillary clinton. they held their nose. they are not necessarily pro trump. that is a soft amount of support and he could an tig niez them. so there's no question about it that that number is much softer than i think it looked on election night. that quinnipiac poll actually does expose real null verbilities and there are a lot of breaking point. >> thank you both for joining us. appreciate it. >> hank you, lawrence. >> thank you. >> coming up, justice department
here's what nate silver said in his post election polling analysis. i'll put it like this, hillary clinton would almost certainly be president-elect if the election had been held on october 27th, the day before the comey letter. the clinton campaign will join us to discuss the new investigation of the comey letter. just like the people
who own them, every business is different. but every one of those businesses will need legal help as they age and grow. whether it be help starting your business, vendor contracts or employment agreements. legalzoom's network of attorneys can help you every step of the way so you can focus on what you do. we'll handle the legal stuff that comes up along the way. legalzoom. legal help is here. ugh. heartburn. sorry ma'am. no burning here. try alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. they don't taste chalky and work fast. mmmm. incredible. can i try? she doesn't have heartburn. alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. enjoy the relief. i wanted to know where i did my ancestrydna. the most shocking result was that i'm 26% native american. i had no idea. it's opened up a whole new world for me.
♪ the justice department inspector general announced today that will review how the fbi handled certain aspects of hillary clinton's e-mail investigation ahead of the presidential election. michael hero wits said his review will include james comey's press conference in july and two letters that fbi director sent to congress the first letter was sent 11 days before the election. the second was sent two days where the election. more than one exhaustive polling analysis including nate silvers indicated that those letters cost hillary clinton the election pl joining us now, former co-chairman of the clinton transition team and president for the center of american progress, that is to say clinton campaign, the teleprompter gets thing wrong once in a while. thank you. i know your campaign add strong reaction when you got hit with
those comey letters. what is your reaction to the inspector general now saying we will investigate all of that? >> well, i think it is absolutely the right thing to do. truthfully this is a situation of better late than never. it's really unfortunate that it's taken so long for the -- for an investigation of the fbi to take place. what's happened here i think is the fact that it came to light this week that bi had received a warrant to look at, to examine connections between the trump campaign. this came out in the guardian a few days ago. they came -- they received a warrant to investigate connections between the trump campaign and russia. so what we learned from that is that they had an investigation of russia and trump. which they never discussed. never leaked. never sent a letter to the congress about. and at the same time, they chose to go public in the last weeks of the campaign.
violating two rules. one rule is not to affect the election and the other is to publicly discuss investigations. i think the untenable investigation of two campaigns and only discussing one of them with the public before an election made the inspector general finally take these steps that frankly should have happened in july of this year when director comey violated procedures by actually holding his press conference. >> let's listen to what senator widen said to director comey this week when they were asking him about this fbi investigation of donald trump of the ties to russia. let's listen to this. >> has the fbi investigated these reported relationships and if so, what are the agencies finding? >> thank you, senator. i would never comment on investigations whether we have one or not in an open forum like this. so i can't answer it one way or
another. >> will you provide an unclassified response to the question i asked and release it to the american people prior to january 20? >> sir, i'll answer any question you ask. but the answer will likely be the same as i just gave you. i can't talk about it. >> and so, near or there is there is the irony. but the fbi directors case on this is that the clinton case was unique. that this was the situation in which something a had to be done that was outside of the normal procedures. and let me ask you this, let's imagine the world in which the fbi never revealed anything about its investigation of the clinton e-mail situation. would your campaign then be left with dealing with the problem of them never having released anything? because what he actually did release that first time around was, hillary clinton did not violate the laws that the fbi was studying. >> mm-hm. i mean, we have an example of what's happened here because the
fbi does have an investigation or at least did have an investigation of trump, of the trump campaign and its connections to russia. they in fact saw it and received a warrant to investigation that connection. and yet, we haven't -- we never really heard about that in detail and certainly didn't have it confirmed until this week. so you know, that's what's extraordinary about this. what's extraordinary about this is taking two campaigns and treating one in a public fashion, violating the rules as the fbi director just said. his rules are to never discuss. he violated that for hillary clinton. and kept to it for donald trump. i think it fundamentally should concern the public and shakes the faith of the public that fbi is not become a partisan, a partisan agency, which it has had history of and we should be deeply concerned about such a pattern. and i have to say, frankly, i do not understand why the fbi
director has not explained this in more detail and more fully. i'm thankful for this investigation. but the public should be deeply concerned about such partisan action by the fbi. >> quickly, what will be left with at end of this is at least some kind of recommendation i think for policy going forward. you're a lir, what would you like to see be the policy that can be held to consistently in every case going forward? >> i would like the policy to be the policy that it's always been that you do not effect elections, you don publicly discuss these publicly discuss these, there should not be a rule that has an exception for one person whose name is hillary clinton. >> thank you very much for joining us. eye real i really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> coming up, all experts are warning that the threat of nuclear war is approaching historic risk levels.
if you thought the cold war was risky, we're not out of it yet. former secretary of defense will join us with his concerns. ♪ hi, i'm erica, and i take movantik for oic, opioid-induced constipation. i used to run, i loved it but a bad injury led to chronic pain. prescription opioids helped with the pain... but left me constipated. fiber, laxatives, still constipated.
finally, i let it out, told my doctor. that was my movantik moment. he said movantik is specifically designed for oic and can help me go more often. don't take movantik if you have a bowel blockage or a history of them. movantik may cause serious side effects, including symptoms of opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain and/or diarrhea, and tears in the stomach or intestine. tell your doctor about any side effects and about medicines you take. movantik may interact with them causing side effects. let it out like i did. have your movantik moment. talk to your doctor about opioid-induced constipation. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. opioid-induced constipation. prescription opioids helped my chronic knee pain, but left me constipated. finally, i let it out. told my doctor. he said movantik may help me go more often. don't take movantik if you have or had a bowel blockage. serious side effects include opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain, severe diarrhea, and stomach or intestinal tears. tell your doctor about side effects and medicines you take.
movantik may interact with them causing side effects. have your movantik moment. talk to your doctor about opioid-induced constipation. like their photo claims tool. it helps settle your claim quickly, which saves time, which saves money. and when they save, you save. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. esurance does insurance a smarter way, which saves money. like bundling home and auto coverage, which reduces red tape, which saves money. and when they save, you save. that's home and auto insurance for the modern world. esurance, an allstate company. click or call. rex tillerson put exxon's interests before america's.. i'm not here to represent the us government's interest. instead, tillerson sided with putin. with billions in russian oil deals... he opposed us sanctions on russia... ...for war crimes forced to pay hundreds of millions for toxic pollution... ...putting profits ahead of our kid's health.
drift among unparalleled catastrophe. the dynamics of that draft will change dramatically on inauguration day when the biscuit is passed from president obama it donald trump. the discut is the nickname for a card, verification codes, for launching nuclear weapons. presidents are always supposed to have that in their pockets. standing steps away when the biscuit is passed will be a military aide with the football. that the nickname for the brief case that carries the means for starting nuclear war. the brief case that always carries in it the potential to end life on earth as we know it. for the first time in history, the biscuit will be in the possession of a man who does not fear the awesome power of nuclear weapons. >> at some point we have to say, you know what, we're better off if japan protects itself against this maniac in north korea, we're better off, frankly, if south korea will start to protect itself. >> saudi arabia --
>> saudi arabia, absolutely. now, wouldn't you rather in a certain sense have japan have nuclear weapons when north korea las nuclear weapons. nuclear should be off the table but is there a time, possibly. why do we make them? >> william perry is one of the people who helped bring this country back from the brink of nuclear war. it was his job to study cia photographs of soviet missiles in cuba during the 13-day cuban missile crisis of 1962 and every night he went to bed during those 13 days, he felt like the world could come to an end tomorrow. he served as secretary of defense for president clinton and believed then that nuclear threat was behind us. soviet union had collapsed. he was working hard with the russians to help dispose of the left over arsenal of nuclear weapons and to reduce the united states arsenal of nuclear weapons. we now have a russian leader who
wants to build up his arsenal and an incoming president into the united states who wants to do the same thing. he is as worried about nuclear weapons as of now. william perry from stanford university and secretary of defense from 1994 to 1997, thank you for joining us tonight secretary perry. appreciate it. >> thank you, lawrence. >> tell us about where you think the world now stand in terms of that brink that you lived on for so many decades, that brink of the use of nuclear weapons, if not, nuclear war. >> today i believe that the likelihood of a nuclear catastrophe is actually greater than it was during the cold war. >> why is that? is that because there are more dispersed nuclear weapons and that the people in control of them do not have the same incentives that united states and soviet union have? >> no, i think it is primarily because dangers, the nuclear dangers from the cold war, are
returning with the increasing hostility between the united states and russia. beyond that there are two new dangers. the danger of nuclear terrorism and as always, beside nuclear terrorism, there is a possibility of a regional nuclear war. none of those existed during the cold war. those are new. >> and the nuclear terrorism, how close do you judge us scientifically to be from the possibility of nuclear terrorism, how complex would it be to pull off a nuclear terrorist act? >> i think of all the dangers we're facing, that the one that is most likely. all that's stopping, we know that nuclear terror groups would like do this. we know that al qaeda wanted to do it. we believe that isil wants to do it. all this stops them is getting their hand on the nuclear fuel. if they can get that, they could make a bomb and that bomb would end up in one of our cities. >> what's the nominee for secretary of defense said about this today.
i guess we don't have the video of it. he said, i consider the nuclear deterrent to be critical because we don't ever want to use those weapons. secretary perry, you know james mattis, first of all, your score card of him as potential secretary of defense pf and your understanding of his view of this issue? >> i know him very well. he worked for me for two years when i was secretary of defense asthma reason colonel. he worked directly in my office. the last few years he's been at stanford. i've had many meeting he. i think he is a man of great intelligence and great integrity. >> do you think he has the right view, does he share your kind of view of the nuclear brink? >> i believe -- i can't say he shares my view, i can't say that for certain. but i believe he is conscious of nuclear dangers and is knowledgeable about problems we're facing. >> how would you weigh the risk
factor after president of the out who made the kinds of comments about nuclear weapons that incoming president trump has? >> i must say, i am concerned with the fact that one man, president of the united states, whoever that president is, is the only person that can start a nuclear war. that one person can start a nuclear war. that's been a problem, in my mind, a with all presidents and of course a problem with this president. >> and is there any method that you can conceive of that would somehow remove that power from the presidency as we have discussed on this program in past. sometimes with the possibility of incoming nuclear attack. a president would have six minutes or less to decide to retaliate. in that kind of scenario, is there any alternative to just entrusting all of this power in one person? >> with the constitution of course faces responsibility for making war with the cons gres.
the president can propose the congress has to approve of it. on the other hand, you can say, in the case after nuclear war and veents may happen to fast. there is no time for congress. what we can do is require that the president not launch a nuclear war absent an actual nuclear detonation in our country. in other word, unless we are under attack, unless it is a hundred percent evidenced we are under attack, we've had at least three false alarms in the past where our system warned us a nuclear attack was under way. i, myself, got a telephone call in the middle of the night telling me there was a nuclear attack. 200 icbms were on their way from the soviet union to the united states. it turned out to be false alarm and happily the north american commander recognized it as a false alarm. but had he not, we would have gone to the president and he would have had maybe five, six
minutes to decide whether to launch on the fear that the missiles might be named at our rc m rcbms and might be destroyed. one could insist that president could not exercise that power until a nuclear attack had actually taken place, undisputably, on the united states. >> secretary william perry, so much more to learn about this. it's in your book "my journey at the nuclear brink." thank you very much for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> coming up, democrats made history in the senate last night. but not the way they wanted to. robert riesh will join us.
scalpel. i have no idea what i'm doing. i'm just a tv doctor. i never went to college. (scream) i don't do blood. but now, thanks to cigna, i can do more than just look the part. is that a foot? we are the tv doctors of america. and we're partnering with cigna to help save lives. by getting you to a real doctor for an annual check-up. so go, know, and take control of your health. doctor poses. cigntogether, all the way.
it organizes all his accounts, so he knows where he stands in an instant. ahhh...that's a profit. which gave him the idea to spend a little cash on some brilliant marketing! ha, clever. wow, look at all these new students! way to grow, rodney! know where you stand instantly. visit quickbooks.com. bounty is more absorbent,mom" per roll so the roll can last 50% longer than the leading ordinary brand. so you get more "life" per roll. bounty, the quicker picker upper if you are watching the senate floor last night as sds the clock approached 1:00 a.m., as i always do, you saw something we've never seen before. organized violation of senate rule 12 on the senate floor. senate rule 12 says when the
yays and nays are ordered the neighborsf sators shall be called alphabetically and each senator shall without debate call his consent or descent. when your name is called you are only allowed to speak one word. here is what happened when democrats voted last night on budget resolution that is the first step in the repeal of obamacare. >> on behalf of tens of millions of americans, who will -- whether they're in the exchange or not, if aca is repealed, i vote no. >> on behalf of 14-year-old -- >> debate is not allowed during vote. it is not allowed during debate. senate will ignore. debate is not allowed. senate will be in order. floor will continue to call the role. the clerk will continue to call the role. >> mr. white house, no. >> i vote no on behalf of the
more than -- >> debate is not allowed during a vote. senate will be in order and the clerk will continue to call. >> madam clerk, on behalf -- >> the senate will be in order. debate is not allowed. senate will be in order. senate is out of order. the senator is out of order. senator may vote. senator is out of order. >> senator warren was out of order. but she voted. robert reich will join us next. . i was energetic. then the chronic, widespread pain drained my energy. my doctor said moving more helps ease fibromyalgia pain. he also prescribed lyrica. fibromyalgia is thought to be the result of overactive nerves. lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. for some, lyrica can significantly relieve fibromyalgia pain and improve function, so i feel better. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions
or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. with less pain, i can be more active. ask your doctor about lyrica.
has been a struggle. i considered all my options with my doctor, who recommended once-daily toujeo®. now i'm on the path to better blood sugar control. toujeo® is a long-acting insulin from the makers of lantus®. it releases slowly, providing consistent insulin levels for a full 24 hours, proven full 24-hour blood sugar control, and significant a1c reduction. and along with toujeo®, i'm eating better and moving more. toujeo® is a long-acting, man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. allergic reaction may occur and may be life threatening. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens, even if the needle has been changed. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be serious and life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily while using toujeo®.
injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose or type of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor if you take other medicines and about all your medical conditions. insulins, including toujeo®, in combination with tzds (thiazolidinediones) may cause serious side effects like heart failure that can lead to death, even if you've never had heart failure before. don't dilute or mix toujeo® with other insulins or solutions as it may not work as intended and you may lose blood sugar control, which could be serious. toujeo® helps me stay on track with my blood sugar. ask your doctor about toujeo®. up to 30 million americans will lose their health care, with many thousands dying as a result. because you have no health insurance and you can't go to a doctor or a hospital, you die. >> joining us now, robert reich, former labor secretary under president clinton. from the university of
california at berkeley and author of "saving capitalism for the many, not the few." robert, you're a veteran of one of these health care wars, the clinton campaign to reform health care. you have seen how it is. that one failed. the obama version squeaked through by one vote in each body. it seems to me that the repeal procedure is almost as difficult, if not more difficult, than the procedure that both the clinton bill failed to get through and that the obama bill did get through in actually passing one of these things. >> part of the problem, lawrence, is procedure. there are a lot of opportunities for democrats to block and tackle. but larger problem is political. that is, what are you going to replace obamacare with. you can't very easily just leave 24 or 25 million americans high and dry. yet that's what the repeal would
do if there's not a replacement. and president-elect trump keeps saying he want it replaced. paul ryan keeps saying, well there will be a replacement. they've been trying to come up with a replacement now for six or seven years. they have not come up with a replacement. there are good reasons for that, because it is very difficult to replace something that is as complete and kind of intricate and the affordable care act. >> let's listen to what senator ron johnson republican said about the replacement today. >> so exactly what is the replacement plan that you would favor? >> well, again, i will freely admit that republicans and the house and senate don't have total agreement on exactly what that thing is going to be. but the lemts aelements are pre common. >> robert reich, the elements we've heard do not come close. not even vaguely close to
preserving coverage for the people who have it now. which is a stated goal of donald trump's, that no one should suffer in the repeal of obama care. >> and that's exactly the problem the republicans are going to be facing. now there are some republicans in the house and some in the senate saying, let's repeal it and then let's kind of build in a replacement over time. let's give ourselves two or three years. there are other republicans and again the president-elect has said this, no, we've got to replace right away, as soon as we repeal, we replace. but there is kind after logical impossibility they face. i mean, there are certain provisions of this fact, such as providing care for people with preexisting conditions, that depend on other provisions.act, providing care for people with preexisting conditions, that depend on other provisions. such a. >> as mandate, even young people, to pay into health care. if young people don't pay in, they are healthy, most of them,
their payments support a system that permits preexisting conditions to also be funded. without one you can't have another. and a conundrum facing taxes that pr side subsidies for 80% of people receiving obamacare or affordable care act oont on the exchanges. there are taxes on the very wealthy. this is a very progressive tax system. if republicans repeal it, who gains? well the people at the top make a huge amount of money. the people at the bottom, working class especially donald trump's constituents, as it were, they are going to be hurt very badly. >> and just to keep that connective tissue clear, the reason of course you have to have subsidies is that have you a mandate and the mandate can be falling on people who cannot afford health insurance without the subsidies so you're
mandating them to buy something they can't afford. that's why subsidies come in. as you point out, mandate has to be there once you say you want to allow people with preexisting conditions to be able to get health insurance. again, preexisting conditions is something donald trump has said repeatedly he wants it preserve but he doesn't seem to understand that that means preserving the mandate and prederveing the subsidies. >> exactly. so it is all built into a kind of a system that any given part, if you remove it or repeal it, you've got to come up with something else and the republicans don't want to do that because they don't know how to do that. in fact, one of the great ironies here, lawrence, is that only real system you can come up with that provided 20, 25 million people, the heal mg care they now have that they would otherwise lose when republicans repeal obamacare, affordable care act, only system is a single payer plan.
of course republicans never would go along with a single payer plan. but that is the, as a practical matter, that's the only alternative for making sure that all these people have health insurance, health care. as bernie sanders said, without health insurance we are going to see more people dying. it is as straight and simple and tragic as that. data supports that. >> there are many impassioned speeches on the senate floor last night. i wish we had time for more of them. but i'm afraid we will hear many more of them as this year goes on. robert reich, thank you for joining us. >> thank you, lawrence. >> coming up, on msnbc, joe biden told andrea mitchell about that special relationship between joe biden and the president. about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure.
do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. people would ask me that we traveled,ntries what is your nationality and i would always answer hispanic. so when i got my ancestry dna results it was a shocker. i'm from all nations. it puts a hunger in your heart to want to know more.
[dad] alright, buddy, don't forget anything! [kid] i won't, dad... [captain rod] happy tuesday morning! captain rod here. it's pretty hairy out on the interstate.traffic is literally crawling, but there is some movement on the eastside overpass. getting word of another collision. [burke] it happened. december 14th, 2015. and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ before president obama surprised joe biden this afternoon with the presidential medal of freedom, the vice president told andrea mitchell about the special relationship he has with barack and michelle bam and about the bond their families have built over the past eight years. >> and i really, michelle, i think michelle is the finest first lady in history. i mean, history. there's been wonderful first
ladies. but she is so smart. she is so, so descent. and she is so inclusive. i mean, so inclusive. looking at her, and the whole world looks at her, and she conveys such a -- she conveys america. so it's been -- i'm going on too much, but i really -- i don't like them, i love them. and it's -- it's a mutual thing. we've had each other's backs and i'll be there for anything he wants. >> msnbc's live coverage continues into "the 11th hour" with brian williams. that's next. tonight, how smart is it for the president-elect to antagonize his own intelligence community as we learn more and more about what happened behind closed doors with donald trump?