tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC July 5, 2017 8:00pm-9:00pm PDT
dead at 3:37 a.m. her nephew, john quell low, told "the new york times" she was a wore yore to tell you the truth. she was a fighter. she was tough. that was the job for her. she would say there is nothing easy about it but she loved what she did. new york city policemyio so thetis familia was 4 years old. after a day of celebration, the bronx, new york city and this country lost a hero last night in what sounded like fireworks but was actually the sound of an american tragedy. high stakes. with the whole world watching, president trump is in quar r war sar preparing for his first face-to-face vladimir putin. plus, north korea's nuclear threat.
the missile that can reach america. it caught u.s. intelligence off guard. now trump is forced to respond. the 11th hour begins now. good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. i'm nicolle wallace. brian has the night off. day 167 of the trump administration and with two big international challenges facing the president right now, we have one big question, what's the strategy. in two days, president trump will meet face-to-face with russian president vladimir putin for the first time since taking office. the "new york times" reports trump's aides are worried about that meeting with putin. they simply do not know what he'll say. before he heads to germany where the two will sit down, the president is expected to give what's billed as a major speech in a few hours in poland but his aides were still working on it even as the plane landed there earlier today. also tonight, the white house is sending a clear message to north korea after it tested an
intercontinental ballistic missile. the window for a diplomatic solution is quickly closing. here's "uss ambassador to the u.n. nikki haley earlier today. >> yesterday's actions by north korea made the world a more dangerous place. one of our capabilities lies with our considerable military forces. we will use them if we must. but we prefer not to have a to go into that direction. we have other methods of addressing those who threaten us and of addressing those who is supply the threats. we have great capabilities in the area of trade. president trump has spoken repeatedly about this. i spoke with him at length about it this morning. there are countries that are allowing even encouraging trade with north korea in have a violation of u.n. security council resolutions. such countries would also like to continue their trade -- such countries would also like to continue their trade arrangements with the united states. that's not going to happen.
our attitude on trade changes when countries do not take international security threats seriously. >> before becoming president, trump had a simple solution to handling north korea, put pressure on china. >> china has total control. believe me, china they die without china. but china's too smart. they're taking our money. they're taking our jobs, and everything and then we say could you help us with north korea, please, please, help us. china, they don't like to tell us but they have total control just about of north korea. they can solve the problem of north korea if they wanted to. but they taunt us. they say well, we don't really have control. without china, north korea doesn't even eat. china says they don't have that good a control over north korea. they have tremendous control. i would get on with china, let china solve that problem. they can do it quickly and surgically. that's what we should do with north korea.
>> you look at north korea. we're doing nothing there. china should solve that problem for us. china should go into north korea. china is totally powerful as it relates to north korea. >> but after meeting with china's president and talking about north korea, his approach seemed to change. >> first thing i brought up was north korea. said you got to help us with north korea because we can't allow it. it's no good for you. you have a tremendous power because of trade. is he then explains thousands of years of history with korea. not that easy. in other words, not as simple as people would think. >> he went on to write this on twitter this morning. "trade between china and north korea grew almost 40% in the first quarter. so much for china working with us. but we had to give it a try. let's bring in our starting panel, chief foreign affairs correspondent andrea mitchell will, eli stokols and national
political correspondent for the "washington post" robert costa. andrea, i wonder if nikki haley's message at the u.n. is going to carry the day where she's got this very tightly scripted not a red line but a very direct threat about how time is running out on the diplomatic front or if you could predict that this president might get pulled off that obviously carefully crafted message. >> i would predict that he would because first of all, appeals to the u.n. security council have not worked on north korea. they've been sanctioned but not secondary sanctions that really force china and chinese banks to stop propping up that regime. and it's in china's interests, they believe, to keep north korea as a viable state because they don't want to have a reunited korean peninsula with the u.s. as a predominant power there. they would rather have kim jong-un there even with his
nuclear weapons which they think they can exert some leverage on. with that, they're going to veto any tough statement from the council. it was interesting she didn't present a resolution today because they can't agree on one and haven't agreed on one. it will take days and days. it will get watered down. russia and china are working to the now and calling on the u.s. and south korea to stop their joint military exercises which for the first time included the firing of missiles last night after, of course, missiles into the water as sort of a signification, if you will, of their anger and their military response and readiness. but the fact is, this was a game-changer. this is a long-range missile, a two-stage ballistic missile fired more than 1700 miles up. that is way higher and farther into space than our orbiting space station, and it does have the range of an intercontinental ballistic missile. what they have not yet achieved
we believe is a min yaorized and hardened nuclear weapon. they could reach alaska and our mainland noud with their icbm. >> you mentioned russia, andrea. secretary of state rex tillerson in the last hour talked about this high stakes meeting. >> exactly. >> between the president and vladimir putin. let me play what he said and get your
reaction on the other side. >> sure. >> i think the important aspect of this is that this is where we have begone effort to begin to rebuild confidence between ourselves and russia. at the military to military level but also the diplomatic level. think it is an effort that serves both of our interests as well as the broader interests of the international community. we hope this is going to be the beginning of other important areas that need to be addressed in order to strengthen our relationship. but we're at the very beginning. i would say at this point, it's difficult to say exactly what
the russia's intentions are in this relationship. i think that's the most important part of this meeting is to have a good exchange between president trump, president putin over what they both see as the
nature of this relationship between our two countries. >> andrea, excuse my bluntness. i mean no disrespect to the secretary of state. what is he talking about when he says an effort to rebuild confidence between ourselves and russia at the military level and the diplomatic level. russia hacked our election. there's no debate in this country whether that's a fact. what is he trying to say? >> he is trying to put some meat on the bones of a trump/putin summit which will not address the central fact of our relationship right now is that they hacked our election and that the intelligence officials, the entire intelligence community and bipartisan leaders in congress believe is a serious attack on the united states and needs to be investigated. one person does not accept that and that is the president of the
united states and maybe the coat ter rearound him, perhaps they view it as alternative facts. he's trying to give another aspect to the agenda and say they're going to talk about syria and post isis syria because raqqa in months to come could follow mosul. there are indications that isis is breaking up in syria and they are making some progress. i'm hearing this from other ambassadors. that said, rex tillerson is home alone. we still have very -- 30 appointees so far. hundreds unfilled. not nominated. and jared kushner has a larger staff right now than does the secretary of state. there are about five people working for him directly. the others are acting assistant secretaries who downtown have any power. they're exercising the power in a vacuum, but the chiefs of mission at embassies around the world are afraid during a job freeze at state to exercise any kind of judgment or policy.
most of them are just waiting for orders, orders that never come down. so tillerson is trying to say yes, there's an agenda for putin and trump and it doesn't have to involve that messy little hacking thing. >> robert costa, it's pretty extraordinary point that andrea makes about the fact that jared kushner has a bigger staff of political appointees than the secretary of state does. but your paper has a piece right now saying at the g-20 summit, it looks more and more like trump against the world. from the piece i'm going to read a quote. officials are likely to face strains as they try to cobble together the joint statement because trump could easily block any language he feels tries to box him in on his trade or climate initiatives. trump col also risk alienating the white house from foreign leader who's often looked to the u.s. for leadership on all these issues. your paper and others pointed out he's already peeved with angela merkel that she's needled him on climate change in front
of her own domestic audiences. i wonder the mind-set of the white house staff who in the minds of many botched the first stop with nato allies. are the stakes higher in their mind or are they simply basking in what i believe to be our bussed in adoring crowds in poland and letting the president sort of -- letting trump be trump in front of adoring crowds albeit busted in crowds in poland? >> there are two currents that run through the trump administration's foreign policy. we've seen this in recent months. one is that jared kushner even though he's not secretary of state is in effect the shadow secretary of state, the person building the relationships for the president but it's important to note that as much as kushner is this key figure, he does not have a driving ideology. so he's this relationship builder. the other person is steve bannon and steven miller, the nationalists within the west
wing are trying to build a new kind of foreign policy. you can expect president trump i'm told by my sources in the white house to hit nationalist themes in poland to talk about poland as a nationalist success. this is a new way of approaching foreign policy. we've rarely heard the term nationalism in the u.s. foreign policy for a long time. now it's back. i think it's bannon shaping the ideas, kushner shaping the relationship. >> eli, robert lays it out perfectly these cross pressures. we were talking earlier today about the incoherence which is another way of seeing it in terms of foreign policy. i mean, he's in poland and really one of the greatest geopolitical threats to poland is putin. so how does he juggle sort of the incoherence of a national security strategy? >> he's going to give lip service at least to protecting poland and europe from russia and its ambitions but like
robert said, he's going to focus on sort of embracing the government, the ruling party, the leader of poland who in trump's view and bannon's view sort of mirror in a european way is the nationalist populism that trump personifies in the united states. they have cracked down the media in poland. there are a lot of things similar. he's going to praise that government. the problem is that doing so it's a photo op. he gets a nice picture of being embraces by the crowds, images important to trump. even if it may sort of be saeching to them to see the merkels of the world upset with them, they're going to need these long-time allies on other things. they're going to need -- you need allies. this america first and like we're going to save the world from everybody, the incoherence has been there all along with trump's foreign policy. you're sort of sticking another
finger in merkel's eye and the western european countries. that's necessarily showing a sort of long-term thinking. you have the meeting with putin. there are a lot of landmines on this trip. haven't even talked about north korea. this is a president who kind of just goes one step at a time and does the feel good thing that's right in front of him. >> robert, weigh in and get the last word on this part of the conversation. does the white house trying to juggle the backdrop of the putin meeting or are they simply trying to get in and out of this for trip without making any mistakes like what most people saw as a botched stop at that nato summit. >> you could say all the above, nicole. this is a white house that knows putin meeting has a lot of consequence for them. they don't want to the put a huge emphasis on them even though they do want to reimagine u.s./russia relationships. they're still part of the republican party at home, a more
hawkish republican party. they need to underscore some commitment to western europe even if it's not their natural inclination and want to the establish trump as some kind of nationalist figure in europe. >> amazing dynamics. i love the way you put it. robert, thank you for being with us. how do you convince the leader of a rogue nation to give up his nukes if the last guy to do so ended up dead? that's the challenge facing the president when "the eleventh hour" continues. there's a denture adhesive that holds strong until evening.
the future isn't silver suits anit's right now.s, think about it. we can push buttons and make cars appear out of thin air. find love anywhere. he's cute. and buy things from, well, everywhere. how? because our phones have evolved. so isn't it time our networks did too? introducing america's largest, most reliable 4g lte combined with the most wifi hotspots. it's a new kind of network. xfinity mobile.
yogig-speed internet.me? you know what's not awesome? when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids. and these guys. him. ah. oh hello- that lady. these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh. sure. still yes! you can get it too. welcome to the party. introducing gig-speed internet from xfinity. finally, gig for your neighborhood too. make no mistake, north
korea's launch of an icbm is a clear and sharp military escalation. the north korean regime openly states that its missiles are intended to deliver nuclear weapons to strike cities in the united states, south korea and japan. and now, it has greater capacity to do so. >> that's u.s. ambassador to the u.n. nikki haley again showing just how seriously the administration takes north korea's missile launch test. andrea mitchell remains with us and joining the kufgetting us v just penned "the right way to play the china card on new york." and blues clingner now a north korea expert at the heritage foundation's asian study center. thank you all for being with us. andrea, you have new reporting about the missile launch taking u.s. intelligence agencies by
surprise and about that warning from former president or outgoing president obama to incoming president trump about just this. >> well, in fact, this was a two-stage intercontinent is ballistic missile. immediately afterwards, we were told by u.s. officials, pentagon and intelligence officials that it was a medium range ballistic missile. they did not realize immediately this was the first icbm, a two-stage missile which was capable if the trajectory were flattened out of reaching alaska at least. it went more than 1700 miles out into space. that is way farther than our orbiting space station. and it was really unexpected. they expected a missile test but they did not expect one that included an icbm. that was not foreseen. and it was on a mobile launcher. if you were considering a
preemptive strike. there's a lot of talk we should take military action to take down a missile if we thought that a missile are on a launch pad and had a nuclear weapon, we should take preemptive action. in this case, a satellite is unlikely to spot this missile which was liquid fueled but mobile, and very difficult to spot in the short amount of time that it was ready to launch. so there were only a couple of hours. they didn't see it quickly enough and were taken by surprise. the other piece we're reporting is it's been known former president obama did on november 10th at his first and only meeting with the oval office with donald trump, the president-elect, warn him that he should not be so worried about obamacare but that the biggest threat that he would face would come from north korea. what we've learned in the last 24 hours from multiple sources is that he also warned him of the impending development of an icbm and that that was the real threat. so he should have been braced for this. in should have been more study of it.
my conclusion and other critics is that the process, because of the slow rampup of the filling of positions, of the deputy's positions and acting secretaries, they just have not at all of the agencies defense and state in particular, gotten up to speed. and they're not really functioning to game plan all there. >> bruce, it's a pretty frightening picture that andrea paints. i wonder if i could get you to weigh in all of the talk now privately and publicly is on how to motivate the north korean leader to give up his nuclear arsenal if the last two men to do so ended up dead, saddam hussein and gadhafi in libya. how do you motivate someone to give up their arsenal if the two examples of people who did so ended up dead? >> in my meetings with north korean officials last month in europe, they made very clear that denuclearization was totally off the table. there's nothing the u.s. or south korea could offer to
induce them to abandon their arsenal. that's consistent with other meetings na victor cha and others have had with north korean officials. so what we need to do is stop pulling our punches on pressure tactics. there's misperceptioning that north korea is the most cutoff nation on earth and that's flat out wrong. the u.s. has done things to iran that we haven't done to north korea. for example, the u.s. unilaterally has sanctioned last year only the first time we sanctioned as many north korean entities as those we had sanctioned in zimbabwe. >> why is that? because china runs interference for them? why is that the case? >> there was a reluctance particularly by the obama administration from pressuring north korea. they were doing what i would call timid incrementalism. they would have a few entities sanctioned after each provocation. if you talk to people in the government who work sanctions, they'll say i have a list of
chinese and north korean entities which are violating is u.s. law and we dole out a few and save the next for the next provocation. the obama and i think the trump administration so far has continued to pull their punches. >> victor, do you see it that way as two presidents with very different world views pulling their punches when it comes to new york? >> i mean, in a sense i do. i think that you know, every u.s. president for the past three decades has taken a crack at this problem using negotiations, using sticks. and the problem has not been "uss policy. the problem has been as bruce noted that this is a country that is hell bent on keeping their nuclear weapons and developing a capacity to reach the united states to threaten the homeland of the united states. andrea and i travelled to north korea during the bush administration several years ago and we also had interaction with north korean officials. the one thing that i would say
about the trump administration though is you know, i do feel that when president obama spoke to president trump about this on november 10th, i think he really, president trump got very tuned in on this issue. and has had learned a lot. i mean he's become quite expert on the issue. and. >> do we have time for someone learning on the job? i mean, north korea seems to be all fired up and ready to go. are you reassured that the president is studying up? i mean, are you come for theed? >> i'm not reassured by north korean behavior for sure. but when i look at what they've done which is to first send tillerson, mattis and pence to the region to shore up alliances and died if 86% of north korea's trade is with china, we have to first try with china to put pressure on the regime. >> how is that going in the president tweeted trade between
china and north korea is up 40%. is he acknowledging his own failures. >> right. when that doesn't work, you directly sanction china which they started to do last week with the treasury department sanctioning a bang of dangdong. this is a strategy almost any administration would follow being faced with the challenges of a north korean reem on the threshold of icbm technology that could be operational. so you know, in the end, my point is that the problem is north korea. the problem is not that u.s. policy has been good in one administration or bad in the other. in every single case, the north koreans have been the one who's don't want to make an agreement or want to make agreements they can cheat on. that's why we're in the situation we're now in. >> scary stuff. we'll stay on it. thank you, andrea, victor and bruce. up next, what vladimir putin hope to get from donald trump
last week. >> t we're back after this. i know if the pain comes, i'm not gonna get my job done. pain's kind of self-defining. when it hurts, it hurts. when i can't do something, it makes me feel isolated. with aleve, you can stay strong longer because only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. tylenol can't do that. i get to be present and enjoy what i love. this is my pain. but i am stronger. aleve. all day strong. all day long. you're searching for something. like the perfect deal... ...on the perfect hotel. so wouldn't it be perfect if there was a single site where you could find the right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares prices from over 200 booking sites... ...to save you up to 30%... ...on the hotel you want. trust this bird's words.
tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. for my chronic back painescribed backed me up- big time. before movantik, i tried to treat it myself. no go. but i didn't back down. i talked to my doctor. she said: one, movantik was specifically designed for opioid-induced constipation- oic. number two? with my savings card, i can get movantik for about the same price as the other things i tried. don't take movantik if you have or had a bowel blockage. serious side effects include opioid withdrawal,
severe stomach pain, severe diarrhea, and stomach or intestinal tears. tell your doctor about side effects and medicines you take. movantik may interact with them causing side effects. don't back down from oic. talk to your doctor about movantik. remember: mo-van-tik. atmore than one flavor, oruch texture, or color.ing. a good clean salad is so much more than green. and with panera catering, more for your event. panera. food as it should be.
♪ [brother] any last words? [boy] karma, danny... ...karma! [vo] progress is seizing the moment. your summer moment awaits you, now that the summer of audi sales event is here. audi will cover your first month's lease payment on select models during the summer of audi sales event. training. he will read donald trump in a heart beat. and i tremble at the thought the two of them could be alone in a room. >> congress speaking ahead of
the meeting for which the white house has no specific agenda. even the president's top aides do not note precisely what mr. trump will say or do when they meet face-to-face. jack bar ski is a former spy during account cold war. he cooperated with the fbi and now an american citizen. and josh letterman foreign affairs reporter for the a.p. jack, you think we are ascribing to putin more ju-jitsu skills than he deserves. why is that. >> this is all self-aggrandizement. i worked with a lot of agents and i was one of the better trained agents. we were not supermen and we are not supermen. i couldn't help but laugh when i heard the stability that heal read mr. putin like an open book. everybody does. don't they? >> well, so what do you think from putin's standpoint then,
what do you think he's trying to -- we've read he wants to have the compounds that president obama seized in the final days of his presidency as pub punishment for meddling in the u.s. elections. what does putin want out of the meeting with the united states? >> i don't think it's about any specific goals. it's more or less about when two dogs meet for the first time in a dog patch, they size each other up and who is going to be the top dog. i pretty much guarantee you that putin's advisers told him back at the kremlin, look, there is going to be a great meeting because you're going to come out completelying like a rose because if anything compared to our president mr. putin is very slick. so he will play to the world audience. he will play to his home audience. and he will probably try to get sort of a psychological advantage over the other ego in the room. >> josh, do you think there's
some white house strategy in putting out this whole there's no agenda for the meeting which i find impossible to believe. >> mr. trump, president trump will say whatever he wants to say? do you think they're lowering the bar basically underground so that whatever happens in the meeting, if he doesn't hug him and kiss him on both cheeks, we all say the president stood up to vladimir putin? >> let's face it, even if this were any leader, trump's aides wouldn't necessarily know ahead of time exactly what he's going to say. so he's unpredictable and we sort of have that built into the cake now. we have to look at everyone here in washington is obsessed with what is going to happen if he gets played by putin. what does this look like? under obama you had putin slouching in his chair looking at obama later said he was the bored kid in the classroom and embarrassing the u.s. president that way. in this case, the worst thing that could happen as far as trump is concerned politically would be for putin to come out
and give him a bear hug and to look to cozy with the american leader. that would be incredibly damaging. it's quite the opposite. >> let me stay with that. if they are left alone in a room together as congressman conley said it, terrifies him the thought of it, they might be the only two people in a room who don't accept what everyone agrees to as a cold hard fact that russia meddleded in our election. watch what leading republicans and democrats had to say about that being fact. >> russia will continue to develop capabilities to use against the united states and we need to be ready to meet those threats. >> how much of a threat to global security do you consider the russian president. >> i think he is the premier and most important threat, more so than isis. >> russia continues to engage in exploitation of the u.s. elections process. >> we're talking about a foreign government that using technical intrusion, lots of other methods tried to shape the way we think we vote, we act.
that is a big deal. >> i hope the american people recognize the severity of this threat and that we collectively counter it before it further erodes the fabric of our democracy. >> i think we have to assume for all the reasons that have been discussed here that the russians will be back. >> they're coming after america which i hope we all love equally. >> so josh, i guess my question to you is, how does anyone on the white house staff watch that and contemplate anything other than what jeremy bash called a finger in the chest moment where president trump says to the russian president, hey, i'm the best partner you're ever going to have in the oval office but stay out of our democracy? >> certainly all of the political pressure coming from congress and other areas of washington is for trump to directly raise this issue and be pretty aggressive about it. i don't think there are a lot of the indications if trump raises it it's going to be top of the agenda. the only thing we know they are definitely going to talk about is syria.
we found out a few hours ago from sect tillerson. tremp seems to be immune to the pressures of what other people in washington want him to say or focus on. that's certainly true on twitter and might be the case with his meeting with putin, as well. >> we'll be watching together. thank you for spending time with us, to jack and josh. coming up, the backdrop to there trump/putin investigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. ♪ that's it? new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. trump/putin investiga. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. einvestigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. einvestigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. tinvestigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. investigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. meetinginvestigation. new details on the cloud hanging over the white house when we come back. new details on the clg over the white house when we come back. ♪ i love you, basement guest bathroom.
your privacy makes you my number 1 place... ...to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze air effects with odorclear technology cleans... ...away odors like never before. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up... ...to 30 days. breathe happy with new febreze. introducing the new sleep number 360™ smart bed. the only bed smart enough to change sleep as we know it. it senses your every move and automatically adjusts on both sides to keep you comfortable. and snoring.... does your bed do that? right now save on sleep number 360™ smart beds. plus, it's the lowest prices of the season with savings of $500 on our most popular p5 bed. ends sunday.
if you have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis like me, and you're talking to your rheumatologist about a medication... ...this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain... ...and protect my joints from further damage. humira has been clinically studied for over 18 years. humira works by targeting and helping to... ...block a specific source... ...of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain and... ...stop further joint damage in many adults. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened,
as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas... ...where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flulike symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com this is humira at work. welcome back to the 11th hour. turning now to the investigations of the trump white house and russia. the guardian is reporting tonight investigators are exploring if russia colluded with pro trump sites during the election quoting from the piece, "investigators are looking intoing whether trump supporters and far right websites coordinated with moscow over the release of fake news or paid to boost the stories on facebook. let's bring in joe wine banks,
one of the special prosecutors during the watergate scandal, kasie hunt, capitol hill correspondent, and eli stokols of the wall street judicijourna us. casey, where do the investigations stand. >> at the point where they are casting as wide a net as possible and trying to sweep as much information into the net as they can. congress has a relatively light schedule. then there's an august break. that's not going to be a break for the staff working on these investigations. so you're seeing now reports in the media about new people they're interested in. it's kind of as they learn more. sometimes honestly from press reporting or from other places they are kind of widening the scope of that and trying to make sure they very every piece of information before they start trying to build conclusions. >> are they hitting any sort of pockets of resistance or is most of it about the timing of everyone coming before those committees? >> there are some timing issues. there have been a couple of conflicts between the two
committees as they tried to work it out. jared kushner's testimony got delayed in the wake of reports about it. and there's been some frustration and back and forth. as the concerns about what mueller has been up to, has escalated for some of the potential witnesses in these investigations. they have been approaching these committees more carefully. >> eli, there's reporting out tonight about how bob mueller's team was targeted by the president and his surrogates. they immediately went after any history of political donations on behalf of any of the attorneys working on behalf of the mueller res igflation which is interesting because jared and ivanka's attorney is a very well respected democrat. i'm not sure what the point is. >> and the attorney who worked alongside mueller and that's why you hear kushner getting another lawyer because she didn't want the conflict of interest. >> i'm not sure what the purity test is that the trump team and
-- >> you hit on something. you're right. this is sort of what they do. as soon as this happened and the special counsel appointed they went on the attack because whether they can win on the facts or not, one thing they started doing right away is to go after the people coming after them, to slime ball or note these people he hired some of them donated to democrats. it's the same thing they're doing every day in terms of attacking the media. they did all the way through the campaign. served him pretty well with his base. right now, you have the situation this investigation hanging over him. and what he's doing, what he wants to be talking about is sarah sanders says he wants to talk about policy. no, he doesn't. he wants to talk about how bi biassed the media is. 14% of republicans actually trust the media. if he keeps it there, you've got about half the country that doesn't believe and isn't going to believe anything that gets reported about this investigation. they'll paint the whole thing with a broad brush, call it fake
news and that may insulate no matter what is found out in the end from republicans moving on articles of impeachment or whatever else it is because his base will stay with him. >> jill, that's a pr strategy. it's a political strategy. is it a sound legal strategy? >> it is not a sound legal strategy because all of the prosecutors no matter who they contributed to, no matter what their political views are, are doing their job. and that revolves around facts and evidence. it doesn't matter what their political views are. and what americans need to know is that they are good lawyers. and that they will do their job in the same way that the defense attorneys that have been hired will do their job no matter what their politics are. they will represent their clients and the prosecutors will do their job. and america can trust the outcome. >> jill, i don't know why i still feel surprised when i see all these sort of sacred things
coming into sort of the target range for trump and his allies and their political attacks. i wonder what you think about bob mueller, someone who is a vietnam war veteran or a recipient of the purple heart, someone who i think i can safely say george w. bush revered. he credited him with keeping the country safe after 9/11. he was the architect of knitting together the fbi and cia and connecting the dots. what did you think the first time you saw obviously in team trump's mind, he's fair game for political smears. >> everyone is fair game in the trump administration. and it doesn't make it true. i think what we need to keep in mind is what his record is and how revered he is not just by republicans but by all people. he has a great reputation as do the plebs of his staff. and i think they can be trusted. it is exactly what the trump has always done which is you attack,
attack, attack. his mentor was roy cone. when we talk about all the lawyers he's hired, that was someone who really has influenced him that any publicity is good publicity. if you say it loud enough and often enough, then your supporters will believe it. in the same way he's attacking the press so that people won't believe what the press says is true, when he attacks the prosecutors, maybe his people will not believe that they are honest people who want to do their job. but i think most americans will come to see the facts and will trust the prosecutors. >> casey, the last word here. he does have a fire wall in that republicans in congress see him as george w. bush saw him as someone honorable and fair. >> he has an entire branch of government two branches of government here i think full of defenders. look, there were a lot of conversations when this president was first elected about how he was attacking intelligence agencies. he was attacking the national security apparatus and that the
bureaucracy collectively was going to bite back. you've seen that from the department of justice, not in a public political way but they are continuing to methodically do their jobs. it is something that the trump administration is distracted by every day. >> deep state witch hunt. that's what they're saying. >> thank to you jill and eli. casey is sticking with us. coming up, congress heads home and many of them appear to be in hide agvoiding voters all together when we come back. these birds once affected by oil
on the hotel you want. lock it in. tripadvisor. not necessarily after three toddlers with boundless energy. lower back pain won't stop him from keeping up. because at a dr. scholl's kiosk... he got a recommendation for our best custom fit orthotic to relieve his foot, knee, or lower back pain, from being on his feet, by reducing shock and stress on his body with every step. so look out world... dad's taking charge. dr. scholl's. born to move. be the you who doesn't cover your moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. be the you who shows up in that dress. who hugs a friend. who is done with treatments that don't give you clearer skin. be the you who controls your psoriasis with stelara® just 4 doses a year after 2 starter doses. stelara® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis.
before starting stelara® tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. always tell your doctor if you have any signs of infection, have had cancer, if you develop any new skin growths or if anyone in your house needs or has recently received a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to stelara® or any of its ingredients. most people using stelara® saw 75% clearer skin and the majority were rated as cleared or minimal at 12 weeks. be the you who talks to your dermatologist about stelara®. what i've been hearing the entire recess is people telling me to be strong, that they have a lot of concerns about the health care bill in the senate. they want me to keep working on it. but they don't want me to support it in its current form.
>> that was republican senator susan collins yesterday taking part in a fourth of july prayed in her home state of maine. republicans went back home for the holiday recess facing uncery over their health care bill. collins was only a handful of lawmakers that met with voters face to face as many opted to skip events altogether. joining us is my friend and msnbc charlie sykes. what do you make of this, republicans passed a bill in the house, celebrated in the rose garden, president called it mean, he's now leaning on the senate republicans to do the same thing. they're getting a lot of flak back home. >> there's not a lot of profiles, it's like run away run away. maybe they don't have a choice because what is it they're going to defend? they don't know what the bill is going to look like.
if you're a conservative, you're realizing it's obamacare-lite except a little bit cheaper and a little bit crueller, and the uncertainty about the shape of the bill has got to freeze them. you go into a town hall meeting and what is the case you make? you make the case that obamacare is bad. but generally if you have an idea that you really think is good, why would you hide? while they you be out there making the case? it's not just they're hiding from the town hall meetings. you'll notice that no one is making the case for this legislation. nobody in social media, nobody in the conservative media, the white house is not talking about it, and that's a tell. >> when you said profiles, i almost jumped out of my seat. that's what i thought about susan collins. she was forthright during the entire process. casey was hunting her down and she always talked to you. i think she spoke to the point you just made so perfectly that
this is not a conservative solution for addressing the health care needs of americans. you called it more crew. what is this bill? >> that's the big question here. what is this bill? and the fact is it's not really a health care by what's driving it are two things, number one, getting a win saying we fulfilled our promise, and number the works setting the stage for a massive tax cut for the rich. as a conservative who has argued for years the conservatives we're not talking about cutting the safety net in order to get rich people tax cuts, what do they do? they come up with a caricature of what would be a republican health care bill. i can understand if you're a senator you don't want to stand up and say let's slash medicare and come up with something that's going to disadvantaged
low income people at a time when they're distressed. that is not an easy sell and obviously that's reflected in the apostles as well. >> casey, what do you make of charlie's point that this is neither conservative nor is it a health care solution? what is the marketing job for a bill that is really -- what is it? >> well, i think that's exactly what the leadership have been struggling to try to explain. it's what people on either ends of the conference are saying. you have people like susan collins saying that would devastate poor people in my state and i'm not going to do it. and you have rand paul saying this doesn't repeal obamacare. it's hard to see the point of this legislation. look, i think that -- my sense there's a little bit of coordination on how to approach this town hall, period. this is to a certain extent so
far has prevented difficult pictures or video of lots of lawmakers attacking the bill. you see some of those pictures from the house round. there are people doing modified public things. that i think they want one more shot to do this before it's completely shot down by the public, and i think mcconnell knows if it was out there and took heat for this entire week, it's very possible the momentum would swing completely against him. >> the white house is getting pushback in their effort to obtain information on the state voter files from all 50 states. i think 45 of the 50 states, deep, deep red states, very, very blue states, no partisanship to the pushback, but big-time resistance.
do you think the republicans are pushing back might be a path for republican resistance to an unconservative republican president? >> i'm old enough to remember when republicans and conservatives talked about states' right and when the idea of the federal government coming in and intervening and asking for this kind of data would have been horrible. can you imagine what republicans would have said if the obama administration had argued that they wanted all of the states to give this kind of personal data about voters to the federal government? in a lot of ways this is a reminder that conservatives have always had a legitimate amount of skepticism about the federal government. obviously a skepticism that some of the folks in the trump administration don't share. >> this is why you and i belong to the same therapy group.
there's nothing more important to me than my vacation. so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. and with their price match, i know i'm getting the best price every time. now i can start relaxing even before the vacation begins. your vacation is very important. that's why booking.com makes finding the right hotel for the right price easy. visit booking.com now to find out why we're booking.yeah! no, please, please, oh! ♪ (shrieks in terror) (heavy breathing and snorting) no, no. the running of the bulldogs? surprising. what's not surprising?
i have to tell you something. dad, one second i was driving and then the next... they just didn't stop and then... i'm really sorry. i wrecked the subaru. i wrecked it. you're ok. that's all that matters. (vo) a lifetime commitment to getting them home safely. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. we're back. casey, you have an update on congressmen steve scalise difficult news he's been moved back into intensive care listed in serious condition. they say this is about concern around a potential infection.
sources close to scalise say that this is more caution than anything at this point and that they've said this is going to be a long and difficult road for him. hopefully this is not something as dire as it sounds, but certainly a setback. >> that does it for us. we're back here tomorrow at 4:00. thank you before being with us and good night from new york. happy fifth of july, i hope you had a little time off for the holiday. it's nice to have you here. when the republican presidential primary process started for this past presidential election cycle, it started on the republican side with a very clear favorite. just as strongly as hillary clinton was favored to be the democratic nominee, on the republican side, from the outset, the republican nomination was seen as jeb bush's to lose. jeb bush had universal name recognition. his father had been president. his brother had been president.