tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC September 12, 2017 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
with facebook in particular, but also other social media companies. they say they want to ask about the role of russian money and russian ads and russian bots in russia trying to tip the election towards donald trump. mark warner said about this today, quote, i question whether facebook has put near the amount of resources they need to getting us all the facts. that would be interesting to see on capitol hill. facebook testifying if they ever choose to do it. meanwhile, happy to say right here senator mark warner will be with us here on this show tomorrow night. i have a lot to ask him about. also, little reminder. we've got hillary clinton here in studio on thursday night for one of the first interviews that she is doing about her big new book. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time for "the last word >> good evening. as usual, he will have to watch your show tomorrow night with senator warner so i can figure out how to handle this hour of television. because you will be breaking news. >> i'll send you notes as he says stuff that makes news. >> well, he will be watching. thanks, rachel. >> thanks, lawrence.
>> no democratic presidential candidate, not one has won north dakota in over half a century. 53 years ago president lyndon johnson won north dakota in 1964, and that was the year after the assassination of president john f. kennedy when lyndon johnson was winning in a landslide. president kennedy himself lost north dakota to richard nixon in 1960, and it wasn't close. it's never close in north dakota. in presidential elections. donald trump beat hillary clinton in north dakota by 36 points. take a look at that. look at that store. 63-27. that's north dakota voting. that is the reason president trump invited north dakota democratic senator heidi heitkamp to dinner tonight at the white house. 36 points. and those 36 points are the reason that heidi heitkamp accepted the dinner invitation.
senator heitkamp won her election to the senate in north dakota in 2012 by exactly one point. donald trump won her state by 36 points. politically, heidi heitkamp can't afford to turn down a dinner invitation from this white house. not when she represents a state filled with trump voters. it is hard being a democrat in north dakota, especially in the age of trump. and it is hard being a democrat in west virginia and indiana. it is hard for a democrat to win a statewide election in those states. the three democratic senators from those states were invited to dinner at the white house tonight. heidi heitkamp along with joe donnell, indiana, joe manchin of west virginia, they are the only three democratic senators who did not sign senate democratic leader chuck schumer's letter to republican leader mitch mcconnell and to president donald trump outlining the democrats' principles for tax reform, which was the suggest on the table tonight at the white house.
three republicans joined the table -- senator john thune of south dakota, pat toomey of south carolina. and the senior member of the delegation, utah's orrin hatch, who is also the chairman of the senate finance committee where the tax bill will actually be written that dining table tonight was not the place where a tax deal was going to get done, if the republicans can get a tax deal done. the president couldn't possibly get a commitment of support for a tax bill tonight by any of the three democrats because there is no bill for them to support yet. no bill at all. the dinner at the white house tonight was mostly for the people who were not there. the voters of west virginia and indiana and north dakota, where each one of those democratic senators are up for reelection next year. the president and the republicans want to put as much pressure as possible on those democratic senators to vote for whatever the republican tax bill is going to be. and the republicans need trump
voters in those states to exert that pressure on those three democratic senators. senator joe manchin issued this statement tonight after the dinner. "i was glad to join the president tonight to discuss how we can work together in a bipartisan manner on tax reform. we had a productive conversation about areas of agreement as well as areas where we will have to find compromise. i will continue to fight for a simpler tax code that lowers rates for west virginians and incentivizes main street businesses to invest and grow in america." now, if you stop there, if senator manchin stopped there, everything that senator manchin said, all of that generality is something that every senator from both parties could agree with. but senator manchin did not stop there. he did add one specific deal point. "but we must do this without adding to our staggering debt." if joe manchin votes against the republican tax bill, it will be because it adds to our
staggering debt, and republicans writing a tax bill that doesn't add to our staggering debt is virtually impossible. we have been here before. a republican president pushing tax cuts with democratic senators from republican states feeling that pressure. when president george w. bush pushed tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, kent conrad was serving as north dakota's democratic senator. kent conrad voted against both of the bush tax cuts, and he was doing that about ten years after voting for the bill clinton tax increases. and through it all kent conrad was re-elected in north dakota, sometimes with over 60% of the vote. no one understands the pressures on those three democrats sitting at that white house dining table tonight better than kent conrad. and joining us now, former democratic senator from north dakota, kent conrad, former chairman of the senate budget committee and a former member of
the senate finance committee. and when i saw those invitations go out, senator, i thought of you. i thought well, if kent conrad was in the senate and trump had won by 36 points in north dakota, he'd probably be getting one of those invitations. what would you have done? would you have gone to this dinner? >> absolutely. first of all, i think anyone, any sitting senator who is invited to the white house by a president of either party should go, because it's a chance to influence the outcome. and besides, it's also good manners. you know, when george bush -- george w. bush, bush 43 was elected for the second time, the first trip he made was to north dakota to push his social security package. he asked me to go with him on air force one. and i readily accepted. now i didn't believe in his social security package. in fact, at the venue, i made clear that i thought there were very serious problems with it.
but i thought it's an obligation if the president asks you to go to your state, you go. and i think that's a smart thing to do because you can have an impact possibly. you might influence the outcome. and also, it's just good manners. >> and we saw senator heitkamp do that, travel on air force one to north dakota with president trump. president trump called her out at the rally. but no commitments, just like you and president bush on social security. when the bush tax cuts were done, the first round of the tax cut, they actually got three democratic votes in the senate on the first round of bush tax cuts. on the second round -- i'm sorry, the first round of bush tax cut, 12 democratic senate votes. the second round of bush tax cuts, three senate votes. getting democratic senators to vote for republican tax cuts is not something new. it is actually likely. >> yes, it is.
but i would say this to you, lawrence. it's hard to know with president trump what he might do. it's entirely possible, like he just did with senator schumer, that he crosses over and makes an agreement with democrats. and i think democrats would be ready to agree to a tax bill if it didn't explode the debt, but it did reduce middle class taxes and went after some of these offshore tax havens and abusive tax shelters there is lots of room there. there is lots of revenue there that could be used to reduce middle class taxes. >> well, that would be if you followed the reagan model that was genuine tax reform where one of the principles was we will not increase the deficit. we will not add to the debt. so when we cut a tax rate, we must eliminate a tax loophole so that the revenue stays the same. and doing that, reagan got 33 democratic votes in the senate. >> absolutely he did. you know, lawrence, that's what
makes your show good. you've actually got historic memory of what happened in prior agreements and what might happen in a new circumstance. >> joe manchin's line tonight, senator, leapt out at me when he said that part about, of course, he wouldn't support anything that exploded our debt. now, do you think this is a term of art there? does he mean you can't increase the debt at all? you can't increase the deficit at all? it has to be revenue neutral? and the other two senator, including senator heitkamp did not say that in their statements after the fact. they just issued generalities with no specifics. >> you know, senator heitkamp did make reference to not expanding the debt. it was unclear if that was a reference to the national debt or the debt of individual taxpayers. but she did reference the debt. you know, this is a day when the gross debt of the united states reached $20 trillion. we're going to run deficits this
year of hundreds of billions of dollars. and if the budget plan outlined earlier is actually adopted with huge tax cuts and big increases in spending on defense and infrastructure, and of course now disaster aid, you could see an absolute explosion of the debt, which would be an incredible mistake at a time when economic times are good. you can understand expansions of deficit and debt when times are bad. we generally don't see expansions of deficit and debt when times are good. and these are extraordinarily good times historically. >> senator, what would you say to heidi heitkamp with your knowledge of the politics of north dakota and what she is facing in a possible republican tax cut bill coming her way, since you went through this yourself a couple of times? >> well, i would say to her, look, if it is a tax cut bill that is really aimed at the
middle class, that's not a giveaway to the wealthiest among us, that really don't need any tax relief, and one that is -- covers the lost revenue by shutting down these abusive tax havens and these offshore tax shelters. by the way, if you ever want to do an interesting exercise, google offshore tax shelters. see what you get. it's really quite remarkable. i did it one time. i got a million hits on offshore tax shelters. it's really a whole world that many of us don't know exists. >> chairman -- former chairman of the senate budget committee, always a chairman to me, kent conrad, thank you very much for joining us tonight, senator. really appreciate it. >> you bet. good to be with you. >> we're joined now by senior editor at the new republic. also joining us is ken vogel, a reporter for "the new york
times." ken, we saw these statements coming out of the dinner tonight where joe manchin very, very specific about debt. heidi heitkamp, as ken conrad pointed out a little unclear what she said it. nothing really from senator donnelly, just a general it was a very nice dinner. what do you make of this dinner tonight? >> there is no doubt that it's significant, lawrence. it doesn't take a whole lot of democratic support in the senate in particular to form a new coalition that could potentially pass legislation even as there may be republican holdouts, tax reform obviously is one, that republicans had been advocating for and that trump had been excited about for some time. but you see why a senator like heidi heitkamp or joe donnelly might be persuadable in a situation like this. trump, i think, that was the import, that was the significance really of the debt ceiling deal with pelosi and schumer was not necessarily the
actual what was in the four corners of the deal, which now mitch mcconnell is suggesting wasn't as significant as perhaps trump and schumer and pelosi let on, but rather that trump was willing to reach across the aisle after not having a whole lot of luck working with just republicans to pass health care. >> and jit, there is a conceptual flaw we saw in the meeting tonight. and that is the democrats, if the notion that you could reach over across the aisle and make a deal with the democrats, the democrats cannot bring up a tax bill. they don't have any procedural rights in the senate to even bring up the bill. they cannot bring it through the senate finance committee. only orrin hatch can do that. they can't have a markup of the bill. not to mention the fact that the only parliamentary procedure in the united states constitution is that all tax legislation must begin in the house of representatives. and so there is no one from the real congressional tax world really sitting at that table
tonight. >> that's exactly rite. and i think that gives sort of lie to this idea that there can be any sort of cooperation. i mean trump is facing a real problem in the sense that he should be getting his way on a lot of things. he has a unitary government. but the republicans can't deliver what he wants. so he is looking for other options. but i mean, like, i think that the hurdles are strong enough that it's not going to happen. >> ken, one of strategic problems is if you're donald trump and you're sitting there thinking hey, can i make a tax deal with democrats, the answer is you can, be you can't include virtually any of the elements that we've heard about from what the republicans are talking about. you can't cut the corporate rate as low as they want to cut it. you cannot eliminate the deductibility of state and local taxes, which would be a wipeout and a huge tax increase for
taxpayers in california, new york, and other states. there is every single thing that we have heard about that is in the trump plan and the republicans' plan is something so far unacceptable to democrats. >> yeah, i mean, those three things that you just ticked off are anathema to democrats. that said, in north dakota where heidi heitkamp is going to be up for reelection, she is going to have to with trump voters. there are elements that could be made more palatable to her. i'm not suggesting it would be a deal with the democrats writ large and chuck schumer, but rather that it would be something, that they could find something that would be less objectionable to some of these democrats from red states that could potentially win their support, even as there may be republicans who would peel off. >> but jeet, it's hard to think of the bill in which you can reach around john mccain, around susan collins and pick up someone who is to the left. i mean these senators, as moderate or conservative as they are as democrats, they all are to the left of john mccain and susan collins, right?
>> exactly right. >> so you're somehow going to reach people who are to the left of john mccain and susan collins. if you were doing that and holding on to john mccain and susan collins, you don't need these democrats, because they're talking about doing this in reconciliation. you don't need them. >> that's exactly right, yeah, yeah. the thing is if you can't hold the republicans together, how you bringing out democrats and making it different? i don't see how it adds up. it just -- i mean i think it's a move born of desperation more than anything else. >> there are two completely different approaches in tax legislation in washington. one is democrat. one is republican there is no such thing as an independent approach there is no middle there. trump is going to have to go one way or the other. and there is only one way procedurally where you can actually move the bill, and that's with the speaker of the
house and the republicans in the house of representatives. >> if nothing else, it plants a seed of doubt in the minds of republican leaders, certainly, and maybe even democratic leaders. >> but ken, you can't plant the seed of doubt in paul ryan's mind who knows that it has to begin in the house ways and means committee and he has to approve the whole thing for to it move. he can't trick paul ryan into thinking he doesn't have the parliamentary control over this. we've got squeeze in a break here. jeetheer thank you very much, for joining us. reports that asking him to restore russian diplomatic regulations immediately after the inauguration. why would they think something like that? and robert mueller has hired so be investigators to add to his team that republicans believe that it's almost inevitable that that team is going to find something. flooding and power outages continue to be major problems in
flooding and power outages continue to be major problems in the southeast as the remnants of hurricane irma continue to move north. more than six million people are without power in florida, georgia, south carolina, alabama, and tennessee. and at least 13 deaths have now been reported in the united states, according to fema estimates, a quarter of all homes in the florida keys were destroyed, and another 65% suffered major damage. emergency workers spent most of the day doing door to door -- going door to door to account for the 7 to 10,000 people who did not evacuate. everyone has not been accounted
for. today the white house announced president trump will travel to florida thursday to survey the damage. it's possible the president might also visit the u.s. virgin islands within the next week. hurricane survivors in the u.s. virgin islands described the devastation there as apocalyptic. fema officials toured the islands of st. thomas and st. john today. officials will be on the islands for a long time. we are joined now from st. croix in the u.s. virgin islands by stacey plaskett. she is the u.s. virgin islands delegate to the house of representatives. congresswoman plaskett, thank you very much for joining us on this difficult night. i just want to lay out the geography of the area for people. it's -- we're talking about three islands -- st. thomas, st. john and you're on st. croix that we see on the map. that's about 30 miles or 50 miles south of st. john. and st. croix was not hurt badly by the hurricane.
that correct? >> that's correct. because irma hit us from the northern part, and we had a direct hit of the hurricane while it was a category 5, it went across st. john and touched the northern part of st. thomas directly before it carried on to the rest of the caribbean. so st. croix, which sits 40 miles south of st. thomas and st. john did not get the same amount of hit from hurricane irma. >> and talk about the two islands that did get hurt. st. john was hit as the hurricane moved, it was hit first. that's the smaller of the two islands. relatively small population. small commercial development there. st. thomas is the big one. that's only a few miles away. that's where most of the u.s. virgin islands population is. talk about the way both islands have been impacted. >> sure. you know, i was able to be on the ground for several days on st. thomas.
coast guard were able to bring me in immediately after. and what you see on st. thomas is major damage to not only homes and to individuals and families, but also to much of our major infrastructure. we've lost our hospital, the roof of the hospital came off. windows were blown out, et cetera. government houses, our airport, the terminal looks as if the grenades were put inside, and they were blown up from the inside. also, the -- our air traffic control, schools, firehouses, et cetera, complete loss. also on st. john, which you're correct, has a small population, which took an enormous hit, much of our resorts are now gone from there. kaneel bay. we have trump bay where so many tourists come to st. john. but also the population there is even more isolated. you cannot get airport there's. so we've spent a lot of time with fema, the coast guard and
others who have been extraordinary in working with our governor and with our local emergency management system to clear debris out of the ports so that we can begin the ability to get from the island of st. croix, which has now become the base camp for not only u.s. virgin islands but for other islands as well to get support back and forth. while the government is working with fema, with the department of defense, the navy has brought in three ships, and we have marines that are on the ground. there are also private businesses, ferries, guys with fast boats, men and women who are working to ensure that relief gets to people on the islands -- food, water you. hear the phrase "water, water, everywhere, not a drop to drink." so of course water is vital to us, being on an island, as well as the support services. we're going to have to be thinking long-term about the
power, which is going to take an extraordinary amount of time to get up. our water and power authority have been working nonstop. we found out today that we had another loss of life. one of the linemen trying to restore power for vital services lost his life to working on the line this evening. and so we're continuing to experience losses, but we're also working and trying to be the resilient people that we are. >> congresswoman plaskett, there is so much to talk about. i just want to cover one more point before we go. the devastation we're seeing includes everything. obviously includes schools and the entire school system of the -- of those two islands. what are the -- and here we are at the beginning of a school year. what happens to kids in st. thomas, kids in st. john with the school year coming? what can you offer? >> well, you know, we faced this before during hurricane irma -- i'm sorry, hurricane hugo in
1989, hurricane marilyn in 1995. that's why many of our structures met code. and we're ready for a cat-4, but couldn't a category 5 impact hit. but the government made announcements about families bringing their families over to st. croix. also we have a huge virgin islands population that are in the united states in areas like houston and miami, new york, atlanta, washington, d.c., maryland, virginia area. and many individuals will be bringing their children up to the united states to do that. there are some schools which say hold on. we're going try and bring generation and bring power. st. croix will open up their homes. we're all one family for those students as well. and we're going to try and work on that. but threw is going to be needs. there is going to have to be transportation for these young people to get to those families that are in states, for families that are not able to afford the
plane ticket. there is going to have to be temporary schools that are created, potentially on cruise ships and others that will allow young people to continue to learn. and there is also going to be for those students that move to the states, we live on a tropical island. so boots, hats, gloves, coats are another thing that we're going to have to think about when they're moving with those families there. >> congresswoman stacey plaskett, thank you very much for bringing us the human detail of what's happening there. really difficult situation. really appreciate your time. >> and lawrence, we're so grateful that you are opening up the news to us so that people can see us as americans and what we're going through. and remember us when we're looking about hurricane relief. thank you. >> thank you very much. coming up, reports about russians using facebook to organize an anti-immigration rally during the 2016 campaign. that now which we reported on last night has the attention of the senate intelligence committee. as we reported last night, (burke) at farmers, we've seen almost everything
my frii say not if you this protect yourself.ary. what is scary? pneumococcal pneumonia. it's a serious disease. my doctor said the risk is greater now that i'm over 50! yeah...ya-ha... just one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you from pneumococcal pneumonia- an illness that can cause coughing, chest pain, difficulty breathing, and may even put you in the hospital. prevnar 13® is approved for adults 18 and older to help prevent infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. you should not receive prevnar 13® if you have had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. if you have a weakened immune system, you may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, limited arm movement, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, less appetite, vomiting, fever, chills, and rash. get this one done! ask about prevnar 13® at your next visit to your doctor's office or pharmacy.
as we reported last night, according to the daily beast, russian operatives hiding behind false identities used facebook's event management tool to remotely organize and promote political protests in the u.s., including in august 2016 anti-immigrant, anti-muslim rally in idaho. a facebook spokesperson confirmed to the daily beast that it shut down several promoted events. here is what senate intelligence committee vice-chairman mark warner said about that daily beast report today. >> i'm disappointed that when facebook came and presented to the senate staff, they didn't
lay out this incident. it's one of the reasons why i thought last week the facebook initial presentation was just the tip of the iceberg. we're seeing more evidence of additional ads and how they are used to manipulate individuals. i think they're one of the reasons why we need to bring in facebook, twitter and others. some level public hearing. >> also tonight, buzzfeed reports russia was actively pursuing a full reset of relations with the united states shortly after donald trump took office. according to documents obtained by buzzfeed, in the third month of donald trump's presidency, vladimir putin dispatched one of his diplomats to deliver a bold proposition. the full normalization of relations between the united states and russia across all major branchs of government. buzzfeed reports the proposal reveals one of moscow's unspoken assumptions that trump wouldn't
share the lingering u.s. anger over moscow's alleged interference in the 2016 election, and might accept a lightning-fast rapprochement. joining us spencer ackerman. malcolm nance, msnbc counterterrorism intelligence analyst and author of "the plot to hack america." spencer, so the senate is now interested in your reports about facebook. what are they going to find? >> they're going to find that facebook went from hosting russian active measures online to essentially laundering active measures in right leaf. >> laundering you said? >> you might as well say that. facebook acknowledged to us that these events were not simply things that bots did, not simply things that false accounts put up, but things that they took money for. that's what this promoted event means. this was paid. whether facebook has, as senator warner said, been fully forthright with the senate
intelligence committee and others, it's looking more and more doubt. certainly it's looking like they have vastly more questions than they've answered. >> and what is the venue you expect? do you expect a public hearing now is what you're getting, what you're hearing from senator warner? they will have whether it be mark zuckerberg or facebook official there's explaining exactly what they did? >> i think it's pretty clear that facebook, whatever form they've had the answer questions right now, the senate intelligence committee does not consider that sufficient, that it's -- i can't say that i know that a public hearing is going to happen, but it's looking more likely than not at this point. >> malcolm nance, let me get your reaction to both of these reports. first of all, what we're learning about facebook, and then the notion that vladimir putin believe head had the president he wanted and shortly
after the inauguration, could have a full reset, drop all sanctions against russia, get things back to the old normal with the united states. >> well, let's take point number two. this has been vladimir putin's strategic objective by helping put donald trump into office all along. this is no secret to anyone who has been following the trump russia operation over the last year. the cia, fbi, nsa all said that, you know, the objective was to get donald trump into the presidency for the purpose of resetting russian relations and of course creating chaos and removing hillary clinton from the political scene. that's all happened. with regards to facebook, they're just another component of the russian active measures during this entire campaign. i mean, russia technically virtually marionetting american citizens. i've had that happen to myself on twitter where russian intelligence actually used a
twitter feed to come out and tell american citizens that someone who was supposedly in denver, colorado, was going to assassinate me at a very high profile conference. that is a form of intelligence manipulation of american citizens. and it's the next step of operations, that it started last year is no surprise. >> spencer? >> yeah, to take a point that malcolm made really aptly. you'll remember that toward the end of the obama administration, james clapper, the former director of national intelligence, started to in public briefings on the hill talk about cybersecurity as a more elevated concern than terrorism. one of the points that he would frequently make was at some point the intelligence committee figured they were going to move from an exfiltration model, that is adversaries taking data from secured websites or from someone's servers and so forth, and they were to start moving into not just data exploitation,
but data manipulation. >> right. >> that the data that you encounter online is not necessarily going to be true. what we are now seeing facebook talk about and what we're now seeing facebook yet to discuss, but our reporting as well as others are showing happened was that's basically the model going forward. from this active measure stuff. you saw these really disgusting anti-immigrant islamophobic rallies promoted through facebook. that's an effort to move even further from manipulated data, from false information disseminated widely online, to getting people in the united states who don't know who is really putting this information out there to actually do something. >> malcolm, quickly, before we get to a break here, when the obama administration came out and started publicly talking about interference with the camp -- what was then the campaign, what should facebook and some of these other companies have done? should they have listened to that and at least had meeting saying what do we think our role in this might be?
>> well, certainly they should have done something much, much sooner than we've seen. because they took very active operations against isis and al qaeda and islamic jihadists almost without asking. but when it came to this manipulation of the virtual world, manipulation of social media to the point where they were changing reality for american citizens, i mean, they should have realized that their platform was no longer an information gathering or an information sharing platform, but had been weapon niced into a foreign intelligence and governments system to manipulate american systems. and it continues right to this minute. >> malcolm nance and spencer ackerman, thank you both for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> pleasure. coming up, lawyers are actually warning white house staff directly do not lie to investigators for the president.
dulcolax. designed for dependable relief. to make something original... ...has grown into an enterprise. that's why i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. now, i'm earning unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase i make. everything. which adds up to thousands of dollars back every year... ...and helps keep my passion growing... ...in every direction. what's in your wallet? i need loyalty. i expect loyalty. those exact words were in james comey's written senate testimony when james comey was quoting the president of the united states speaking to him at their one-on-one dinner at the white house, a din they're comey said he thought was inappropriate from start to finish. donald trump's firing of james comey is what first initiated
the robert mueller investigation. and now according to axios, robert mueller is haunting the west wing. that's the phrase that axios uses, with republicans close to the white house saying every sign indicates that mueller is going for the kill. last week robert mueller reportedly told the white house that he wants to interview at least six top trump advisers. and as reince priebus, sean spicer lawyer up, politico reports that lawyers representing trump's current and former aides that they're giving them one simple piece of advice, don't lie to protect the president. the daily beast reports that the trump campaign has begun handing over documents to bob mueller. one former federal prosecutor said that that handover of the documents means that robert mueller probably continue his investigation past thanksgiving at the very least. and in the meantime, the congressional investigation proceeds. and today senator dianne
feinstein said i believe donald trump jr. will appear before the judiciary committee in a public hearing in the coming weeks. but it's chairman's prerogative to set the date, and he'll do so when he thinks it's appropriate. so did anyone tell donald trump jr. not to lie for the president? would the president want donald trump jr. to lie for him? to risk perjury charges for him? steve bannon famously declared on "60 minutes" the other night that the ultimate test of loyalty was how members of the trump team reacted to the "access hollywood" video that came out in october of the campaign in which donald trump bragged about his favorite methods of sexual assault. and steve bannon was once again very, very wrong. the ultimate test of loyalty is now and always has been testifying under oath. anyone in the mafia could have told steve bannon that's when you find out who your real friends are. that's how you find out whose really loyal. this investigation might teach steve bannon and donald trump a lot of what they don't know about loyalty. more on the investigation next.
baa baa black sheep, have you any wool? no sir, no sir, some nincompoop stole all my wool sweaters, smart tv and gaming system. luckily, the geico insurance agency recently helped baa baa with renters insurance. everything stolen was replaced. and the hooligan who lives down the lane was caught selling the stolen goods online. visit geico.com and see how easy it is to switch and save on renters insurance.
through september 17th, save up to $500 on select adjustable sets. and you look amazing...lyt dates.comfortable.azing. when your v-neck looks more like a u-neck... that's when you know it's half-washed. add downy to keep your collars from stretching. unlike detergent alone, downy conditions to smooth... ...and strengthen fibers. so, don't half-wash it. downy and it's done.
northern district of alabama. and back with us, ken vogel. joyce vance, to this advice that lawyers are giving to trump staffers, don't lie for the president, what's your reaction to that? >> well, it's awfully good advice, lawrence. because lying to a federal agent whose conducting an investigation is enough to get you your own personal ticket to federal prison. none of these witnesses want to be converted from witnesses to subjects or targets of this investigation. their best way of maintaining their status as witness is to continue to tell investigators the truth, to produce documents, to not withhold material information, to answer questions honestly. prosecutors love to say that it's the cover-up that hangs people up. and that's true time and time again in these public corruption investigations. >> and ken, i think you and i
know that there are a lot of politicians over the years who really you would have to say that to their staffs because their staffs love them, devoted to them, and were with them for many years and could feel like maybe it's not lying if they're just trying to shade the truth and the favor of the politician. but this white house is the leakiest white house we have ever seen. it almost seems like the trump staff does not need the warning to tell the truth about donald trump under oath because they seem to be telling the dark truths to "the new york times" and you guys and the "washington post" almost every day. >> yeah, that's right, lawrence. it's not just the leaking, it's also the infighting and there are concerns among the trump legal team that prosecutors and the special counsel will use these riffs and fissures between the staff that have been long been festering to essentially
pit the staffers against each other and other trump associates against one another to use something they might get from someone staffer or one associate to leverage something more out of another associate. this, my sources tell me, has led to some dissent within trump's legal team about how to handle this. dissent about pace of document production. seeing the tensions play themselves out in a legal defense in a way that's extremely unhelpful for the president and his team. >> joyce, this point that ken made sounds hugely important, for example, the special prosecutor by reading the pain e watching tv, knows steve bannon hates jared kushners is doing everything he can to hurt jared kushner. they are investigating jared kushner. does the special prosecutor's team go, shouldn't -- do they think we should be talking to steve bannon specifically about jared kushner? >> i would suspect that the special counsel's team will talk to everyone about everything and
by that i mean they'll talk to all of the available witnesses to get their view of what happened. and then they'll see how those versions line up. and it will be the outlier versions, the details that don't match up. if nine people are in agreement and one person is saying something different, something that, perhaps, is more beneficial to the administration, those people become the littlest zebras, the witnesses that mueller will cull out of the herd because if they have exposure for corruption or perjury or false statements, themselves, it may be possible to flip them and have them testify as to what really happened here. >> and ken, there are reports indicating the really decisive conversations about firing james comey which may be the single-most important area of the investigation in the end occurred in new jersey on a weekend when steve bannon wasn't there.
and that ivanka trump was there. steve miller was there. and that might be the spot where the special prosecutor really wants to penetrate, but in terms of jared kushner and ivanka trump, for example, you can't have a spouse testify against another spouse so that might be a tricky one. >> yeah, that's right. it does get to the key point that the former u.s. attorney raised which is that it becomes about obstruction, it becomes about the cover-up. obviously the firing of comey is the key piece of that cover-up, but even the discussions that led up to that firing are critical to establishing the case and to potentially establishing that someone has misrepresented what went on. that's the area that comey is really honing in on according to everyone who i've talked to about this. >> joyce vance, ken vogel, thank you both for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you. tonight's "last word" is next and it is a "last word" about the most important new
bill on the democratic side of the senate. what powers the digital world. communication. that's why a cutting edge university counts on centurylink to keep their global campus connected. and why a pro football team chose us to deliver fiber-enabled broadband to more than 65,000 fans. and why a leading car brand counts on us to keep their dealer network streamlined and nimble. businesses count on communication, and communication counts on centurylink.
and you can too. build a better website - in under an hour. with gocentral from godaddy. and i've never seen a better time to refinance your home, than this summer. why? because right now we're seeing our average customer save $20,000. but with the fed already talking about raising rates, this window will not last for long. lendingtree is the only place to compare up to 5 real refinance offers against your current mortgage - for free. are you sure you have the best rate? take 3 minutes and find out right now. because at lendingtree, when banks compete, you win. you know win control? be this guy. check it out! self-appendectomy! oh, that's really attached. that's why i rent from national. where i get the control to choose any car in the aisle i want, not some car they choose for me. which makes me one smooth operator.
guaranteeing health care to all people as a right, not a privilege. >> bernie sanders got a lot of applause for that, but two weeks ago, bernie sanders had exactly zero co-sponsors in the senate for his single-payer health care bill, medicare for all. and then california senator kamala harris announced she would co-sponsor the bill and so suddenly the loneliest piece of legislation in the senate had a co-sponsor, a first co-sponsor. but kamala harris is not just any co-sponsor, and so then elizabeth warren came onboard. now we begin to notice anything here? they are both likely democratic party presidential candidates. yesterday, another potential presidential candidate became a co-sponsor, senator cory booker, and then today senator kirsten gillibrand became a co-sponsor. and at 6:30 p.m. this evening, senator al franken became a
co-sponsor of medicare for all. any one of those senators could be the party's nominee for president or vice president the next time. and it's not just the likely presidential candidates now who are joining bernie sanders' bill, he now has a total of 13 co-sponsors including senators who are very unlikely to run for president, but who could, could end up as vice presidential nominees. bernie sanders' medicareegislati in a republican controlled congress. everyone knows that. it's where the action is now for possible democratic party presidential candidates all of whom will want to sponsor that bill and get the support of sanders' voters if they run. as every inside look at every presidential campaign shows, candidates who actually win nominations usually begin thinking about the presidential campaign four years ahead of that election. medicare for all is a solid policy idea and it's built on solid democratic party
principles and it is the only possible way to achieve complete universal health care coverage but it also seems to be now a mandatory political position for possible democratic presidential candidates and that's why medicare for all is tonight's "last word." complete universal health care coverage. but it also seems to be now a mandatory political position for possible presidential candidates. and that's why medicare for all is tonight's "last word." "the 11th hour with brian williams" starts now. tonight, donald trump's russia problems as his campaign turns over documents to mueller. the legal strategy this evening for the white house and what trump's closest aides are being advised by their own lawyers. also, the dinner tonight at the white house. the president hosting six senators, three from each party, as the speculation begins about the deal he's trying to make. and we'll get a late live update tonight on the destruction still being unearthed from the sweeping