tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC September 26, 2017 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
here and for the broadcast tonight. thank you for being with us. tonight from nbc headquarters here in new york. former prosecutor. he was a u.s. attorney under president george w. bush both in southern texas and eastern virginia. he was chief of staff to the fbi director and to a senior justice department official and since 2015 he has been the acting director of the drug enforcement administration, the dea
michael schmidt was the first to report the news by explaining his decision to quit and described chuck rosenburg as having quote become convinced that president trump has little respect for the law. "the washington post" followed up with their story confirming this news. veteran justice reporter carol summed up the reporting and reaction by saying quote, this is a big deal. chuck rosenburg, notice a smart manager and a devoted law enforcer leaves. said he concludes trump does not respect the law. so this is an important story in its own right and would be in any administration, right? top law enforcement official saying the president doesn't respect the rule of law? and then resigning on the grounds, letting it be known that's why he is leaving, which is remarkable on its terms under any president but of course, under this president and this particular case, there is also a personal dimension because i
mentioned that chuck rosenburg once worked as a chief of staff for an fbi director. that fbi director was james comey. chuck rosenburg served as james comey's chief of staff when he was the deputy attorney general at the justice department. another twist on the story. the dea director that just submitted resignation today in protest of president trump not respecting the rule of law. that dea director and the fbi director what president trump both fired, who president trump fired, these two guys have a long history of working together and they are said to be personally close and this resignation of the dea director came today within hours of the first reporting that the special counsel's office is about to start interviewing current and former white house officials about, among other things, the president firing james comey. now we know from washington post and "new york times" reporting last week that robert mueller special counsel investigation sought information from the
trump white house on a long, long list of actions related to the russia investigation and potentially obstructing justice by trying to impede the russia investigation. we know that the main lawyer in the white house handling the russia investigation divided robert mueller's requests into 13 different categories. we think we know what those 13 categories of requests are now, again, based mostly on reporting from "the washington post" and "new york times" and according to the reporting from those papers, the request from the special counsel, the stuff they are asking the white house about ranges from anything related to paul manafort, which is the last one there, to any white house discussions about james comey's fire to any white house documents about mike flynn talking to the russians about the presidential election. 13 categories about which the white house fielded requests from the special counsel office. but cnn reports tonight that
robert mueller's investigators may be about to start interviewing current and former white house staff right away as soon as this week. and the sheer breath of topics and incidents that robert mueller is asking about ensures that are a lot of trump white house staffers that are about to get questioned by the prosecutors and if you've done nothing wrong, you have to be aware of the crime to lie and to federal investigators and anybody in this anybody could benefit. from legal advice well, today the "daily beast" was the first to report that sean spicer is the latest trump administration official to have to hire a high-powered criminal defense attorney on the russia issue. on that long list of requests for documents and information that the muller inquiry has reportedly given to the white house, two of the 13 items we believe robert mueller asked
the white house about, 2 of the 13 are specifically statements by sean spicer. muller said to have asked about sean spicer's public statement about the firing of james comey, a statement he might the night comey was fired. muller was said to have asked about another public statement by sean spicer concerning james comey issued about a week before comey was fired and then right after we learned that sean spicer's statements, the two public statements by him are in the cross hairs of the special counsel when it comes to the firing after james comey and whether or not that was obstruction of justice. right after we learned the two statements by spicer were being focused on by muller, axios was the first to report in addition to the statements he made as white house spokesman, in addition to the known public statements about the controversial things that happened, sean spicer was reportedly also widely known to keep copious, very detailed,
long-hand notes of everything that transpired throughout his time in the campaign and in the transition and even into the white house. he kept a detailed diary. learning that, it seemed impossible, i mean, as of just a few days ago, it seemed impossible sean spicer didn't yet have himself a criminal defense lawyer in the russia investigation. given the fact that his statements as white house spokesman are under the microscope and kept a diary. how does he not have a lawyer? now he has a lawyer. as of today, daily beast is reporting he got himself a lawyer. as to how he will pay for that lawyer? stay tuned. so far, the trump reelection campaign and the rnc appear to be paying hundreds of thousands of dollars of russia related legal bills only for president trump and his eldest son, who is also named donald trump. they only pay for legal fees
related to the russia matter if your name is donald trump. one might imagine if you were sean spicer or mike pence or hope hicks or don or reince priebus or jared kushner or any of the other white house staffers who had to hire their own high-powered criminal defense lawyers on the russia matter, one might imagine that might be a sticking point, right? possibly a point of resentment that you're stuck paying what are likely to be millions of dollars for your own legal fees while the billionaire president and his son and heir donald trump junior get their legal bills covered by opm, not the office of personnel management but other people's money. how does that sit with you if you're looking at bankrupting your family to pay your legal fees for a scandal involving donald trump while donald trump doesn't have to pay a thing. as i say, there is always a personal dimension and stay tuned, we've got a little bit of
news on that front and that seemingly unsustainable dynamic within trump world coming on later on this hour. here is another part of this that appeared to hit a breaking point in today's news. one of the other things we know that special counsel robert mueller asked the white house for information about is the meeting held on board air force one while the president was flying home from the g 20 summit. during that flight, the president himself reportedly drafted a statement that was put out in the name of his son don junior. the statement tried to explain away a meeting that happened at trump tower last summer between kushner, manafort, the eldest son and a whole bunch of russians, all of whom turned out to have ties to the putin government and one of whom has ties to russia military intelligence and although donald trump junior soon released e-mails that made clear the purpose of that meeting was for the trump campaign to receive damaging information about hillary clinton that they were told would be provided to them
from the russian government as part of the russian government support for donald trump in the election, despite that explanation for that meeting being made clear in the don junior e-mails that led to the meeting, that initial explanation about the meeting put out by the white house, that initial statement drafted on air force one said nothing about hillary clinton at all. that statement reportedly written by the president personally tried to explain away that trump tower meeting as having just been some stupid thing about russian adoptions. we now know that that deeply misleading lying statement is of interest to the muller investigation and that is is particularly presumably concerning for this white house because it involves the president personally. part of the president's personal defense about that bizarre meeting in trump tower is he says he didn't know about it at the time. donald trump junior insisted he never told his dad about the
meeting despite the fact his dad was there at trump tower that day while the meeting took place and while his son-in-law, his eldest son and campaign chairman attended in person. the news of the meeting first broke in july, the president publicly said on his own behalf that that was the first he learned that that meeting happened. he said that i didn't know until a couple days ago when i first heard about this. that assertion from the president that he never heard anything about that trump tower meeting with all those russians, that may also turn out to be a problem for the president because of the timeline of what happened around that meeting. june 3rd, 2016 is when don junior got the first e-mail promising the russian government had incriminating information about hillary clinton that these -- this russian lawyer from the russian government wanted to hand over in person to help trump win the election. that e-mail was sent to done junior on june 3rd last year. took him less than 20 minutes to respond, if it's what you say, i love it.
over the following four days. don junior admits he had three separate phone calls with one of the russians who was supposedly supplying this information about hillary clinton. we know nothing about the content of those calls but he says there were three of them. then by four days into this, june 7th, the communication chain as much as we know about it came to a close because on june 7th, they confirmed the meeting would happen. 6:14 p.m. donald trump june -- 7th donald trump junior sent an e-mail confirming. the details of the meeting. at that point we know from the communication chain, done junior believe in a couple days he would be meeting at trump tower with a russian government attorney flying over from moscow to meet him and hand him incriminating information from on hillary clinton from the russian government that the russian government believed would help the trump campaign win. confirmed. yes. hit send. i love it. planning on that meeting. that was june 7th.
three hours later after he hit send, three hours later that same night, donald trump senior won a whole bunch of republican primaries, clinched the nomination and gave the victory speech which turned out to be different than usual. turned out to have one key diversion from the typical victory speech, stump speech script. >> i am going to give a major speech on probably monday of next week and we're going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the clintons. i think you'll find it very informative and very, very interesting. i wonder if the press will want to attend. who knows. >> so that was a tuesday. that was super tuesday. june 7th. the meeting with the russians had been confirmed three hours earlier. the meeting with all the russians happened two days later on tuesday, wednesday, thursday. and then the following monday,
june 13th, when trump was probably going to give that new speech, detailing the new information about the clinton campaign, the clinton campaign we now know was braced for whenever this new trump speech would be where he promised new dirt on hillary clinton. instead, that monday, nothing. trump just gave a normal speech. nothing new in it at all. but then you know what? two days later, sensitive intern documents stolen started to leak online. first it was guccifer 2.0 and d.c. leaks and wikileaks and of course, the person that did more than anybody else to promote and draw attention to the leaked documents was donald trump himself. but other people associated with his campaign did more than just hype those documents and promote them. at least one of the persons associated with his campaign appeared to be in communication with the russian operatives and cutouts who were leaking these stolen documents from the dnc.
at least one person associated with the trump campaign actually bragged publicly that he had advanced knowledge of when those leaks would come out and that's something that ends up being hard to explain away later on when he tried to make the case your campaign had nothing to do with this russian attack and anybody who says it isn't is nuts. in august 2016, paul manafort's long time business partner and long-time political advisor to donald trump bragged publicly he was in touch with julian assange of wikileaks and robert stone's direct messages with the hackers going by that online twitter handle and late august well before anybody knew it wasn't just the dnc clinton campaign chairperson had been hacked, trump campaign's roger stone tweeted advanced notice that actually john would be the next target.
nobody knew what he was talking about. quote, trust me, it will soon be podesta's time in the barrel but sure enough, weeks later on the day of the "access hollywood" tape, he's in the barrel and stolen e-mails are getting pumped back and selective leaks from wikileaks. so that operative from the trump campaign appeared today before the house intelligence committee. the top democrat on that committee is adam schiff. he will be joining us live in a moment. but there is one other part that appears to be breaking open at the same time. it is a related matter. and that story is next. blk. >> [ train whistle blows ] what?! -stop it! -mm-hmm. we've been saving a lot of money ever since we switched to progressive. this bar is legit. and now we get an even bigger discount from bundling home and auto. i can get used to this.
throughout history, the one meal when we come together, break bread, share our day and connect as a family. [ bloop, clicking ] and connect, as a family. just, uh one second voice guy. [ bloop ] huh? hey? i paused it. bam, family time. so how is everyone? find your awesome with xfinity xfi and change the way you wifi.
"the washington post" reported twice during the campaign, the height of last summer twice facebook security researchers called the fbi because of suspected russian military intelligence activity that they saw happening online related to our election. first time facebook contacted the fbi was last june. they reportedly told the fbi they come across evidence of what appeared to be a russian spying operation and espionage op. the russians appeared to be breaking in and stealing stuff from u.s. political entities. we know, of course, that that's true. russia in fact did that. well, after that initial notification of the fbi, facebook then reportedly notified the fbi a second time when they say they found evidence that the russians had not just stolen information, which would typically be spying, they are turning it around and projecting that information back
into the united states through russian cutouts like d.c. leaks. if that reporting is right and facebook saw that stuff happening in realtime and they recognized it explicitly at the type as a russian military intelligence operation, well, that makes it all the more infuriating, i mean, fascinating that facebook ceo initially maintained that it was crazy. that was his word, crazy, for anybody to think that online misinformation might have affected the presidential election last year. right? hey, facebook, if you didn't think it was a big deal, why the you call the fbi about it, twice? that new reporting honestly, makes it not just infuriating but bizarre that facebook for months denied overtly there was any evidence of placing paid ads on facebook to affect the election. they denied it for months and after those months of denials,
facebook now admits that yes, russian operatives placed ads, thousands of paid ads on facebook to affect the election. they are explaining denials but saying they hadn't noticed the russian ad buys before, even though some of them were paid for in rubles, which means it wasn't hard to figure out and we know facebook itself reported to the fbi their own evidence of a russian military intelligence operation manifest both as espionage, hacking and stealing related to our election but also active measures to try to affect u.s. voters during the election. they saw that stuff and reported it and it never occurred to them that maybe they would look around to see if it was happening with ads too? well, now, despite initially telling congress they couldn't see the ads, facebook has handed over to congressional investigators about 3,000 of the ads bought by russian operatives. the ads themselves haven't
leaked since they have been handed to congress but a few vague descriptions have. question now is now that congressional investigators have pried that information out of facebook, do they actually have what they need to figure out if trump and his campaign didn't just hype and promote the results of the russian attack on our election system, they didn't just apparently have advanced notice of some of the elements of the russian attack, do congressional investigators now have what they need to figure out if in addition to that, the trump campaign also worked with these russian operatives to carry out this portion of the attack that happened online? do they have what they need to figure that out? joining us now is adam schiff, ranking member of the house intelligence committee. nice to have you. >> thank you. >> i know you will not discuss information that has not been publicly released and what goes through the intelligence committee doesn't get publicly released.
but is there an answer to the question as to whether or not you have what you need in the investigative committees and congress to figure out if some of this online activity by the russians was coordinated with the campaign? >> not yet, rachel. we have a lot more work to do and a lot more information we need to gather from facebook and social media platforms like twitter, as well. all we have at this point is a snapshot of some of the russian activity in social media and as you pointed out, facebook wasn't aware as of recently as july there was paid advertising on the platform but the paid advertising, they have identified they are providing to the committee is only paid advertising that came from money out of russia that they have been able to trace to russia and they have acknowledged that if the russians bought ads through a third country, if they funneled their money through eastern europe or caucuses, that still remains to be analyzed. all we have now is one subset of
russian advertising and of course, in addition to the advertising, the russians creating fake web pages like heart of texas that look like just like an organic texas, don't mess with texas website organizing protests or rallies for one candidate or against the other and have the russians pushing negative stories about hillary clinton or other news they wanted to reach the top of social media feed. we only have really one segment pinned down and that's only one platform. we don't know a lot about the use of twitter and how the russians may have in fact created trends on twitter in an effort to influence the election. there is a lot more work even before we get to the question of did they coordinate this in any way? it was the targeting so specific that it couldn't have happened without the benefit of the data analytics generated by the campaign.
>> i know your committee today spoke with trump campaign associate who bragged publicly about being in touch with julian assange of wikileaks and showed he was in direct communication with whoever it was identifying them as guccifer all identified publicly by the intelligence committee as having been tools of the russian operation to target our election. stone brags about having been in touch with all of them and having gotten advanced notice about their activity from all of them. does his testimony shed any further light on this crucial question? >> well, it certainly sheds some light but among the most significant questions, he refused to answer and i think the ranking republican leading the investigation, the chair of the investigation and myself are in agreement that his refusal to answer in terms of his contacts with wikileaks just will not be permitted to stand.
we gave him the opportunity to come in voluntarily. he said he would answer every question and didn't and it would be necessary to subpoena him if he doesn't cooperate and confining myself to what he admitted publicly. at times he's bragged about communicating with julian assange and we have a deep interest to know if there was an intermediary who that is bring them before the committee and find out what conversations they had with julian assange where julian assange was get mag -- material and the timing of the dumping of this and design of influencing the election and who was behind that and most importantly, whether they had contacts with the trump campaign in terms of the coordination or timing of those dumps. key information he wasn't willing to share today and we have to subpoena him if he doesn't provide voluntarily. >> i hate to ask you this, sir, but
he has singled you out and a couple other members but you in particular as his personal enemy in all this and he wants this to be a fight between you and him. obviously, mr. stone is performative in all his public actions. i have to ask you do you find that districting or offensive or how do you react to him trying to make this a fight between him and you personally? >> well, you know, honestly, i consider some of these a badge of honor when you're attacked by the president or attacked by mr. stone or steve bannon. i just view it as well, i must be doing my job right. >> congressman adam, thank you for your time tonight, sir. appreciate it. >> thank you. >> >> very pleased to tell you, it was hard to set this up but we will be talking live with the mayor of san juan puerto rico. b in control? this guy. check it out! self-appendectomy!
oh, that's really attached. that's why i rent from national. where i get the control to choose any car in the aisle i want, not some car they choose for me. which makes me one smooth operator. ah! still a little tender. (vo) go national. go like a pro. your privacy makes you myt number 1 place to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. febreze air effects doesn't just mask, it cleans away odors. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up to 30 days. breathe happy with febreze.
itthe power of nexium 24hr protection from frequent heartburn. all day, and all night. now packed into a pill so small, we call it mini. new clearminis from nexium 24hr. see heartburn differently. woman: so, greg, it's a lot to take in. woman 2: and i know that's hard to hear, but the doctors caught it early.
hi, blake! my dad has cancer. woman: and i know how hard that is to hear. but you're in the right place. man: and dr. pascal and her team, they know what to do. they know what to do. the doctors know what to do. so here's the plan. first off, we're going to give you all... (voice fading away) some breaking news where out of alabama they called the senate primary, roy moore twice been thrown off the bench for ethics issues he has defeated luther strange in the republican senate primary there. this was the race to fill the senate seat by jeff sessions. luther strange has helped since february when he was appointed by alabama's then governor who
has since resigned in scandal. everybody initially kind of expected that whatever republican was appointed to the seat would coast to a special election win. in this heavily republican state that hasn't happened. it's been as weird a campaign as you can expect. president trump threw his support behind luther strange but at the rally held for strange on friday he told the crowd, quote, i might have made a mistake. [ laughter ] god forbid if that man loves ya. [ laughter ] >> vice president mike pence held his own rally for luther strange last night but as that rally was going on, high-profile trump allies and ex white house employees were rallying elsewhere in alabama for the other guy running against trump's candidate. roy moore then added one last bit of bonkers by literally pulling out a handgun at the rally last night. but now luther strange has lost a seat and roy moore will run against democrat doug jones in the special election for that seat, which will be held on
ugh, you're using a vacation day to go to the bank? i know, right? just go to lendingtree dot com. get up to five loan offers to compare side by side for free. wow, that's great. wait, how did you get in my kitchen? oh, i followed a raccoon in through your doggie door. [gasps] get a better mortgage on your schedule. not the bank's. lendingtree. when banks compete, you win. just think of 'em as a big cat. with rabies. i tabut with my back paines, i couldn't sleep and get up in time. then i found aleve pm. aleve pm is the only one to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. one of the largest trama facilities in the united states is a ship. 900 feet long and 12 operating rooms and 1,000 beds built to handle large-scale disasters. over the weekend, you might have
seen the name when hillary clinton tweeted some advice to the u.s. government about the on going disaster in puerto rico. she said quote, president trump, secretary mattias and dod should send the navy including the "usns comfort" to puerto rico now. these are american citizens. tonight, after a full week after disaster struck, that is what is happening. the comfort is being deployed from virginia to puerto rico where 3.5 million americans are on the brink or in some cases in the midst of a humanitarian crisis that does not seem to be getting better. hurricane maria hit a week ago. the navy says the comfort will set sail sometime in the next four days. takes five days to get there. so that means in nine days or so the comfort will reach puerto rico where they have already been living in the darkness for nearly a week. which means 3.5 million americans are going to have a new form of help when that gets there but in the meantime, wait. and some -- that is something
they have been doing a lot of lately. puerto ricans have been waiting for food and for water. according to the defense department, nearly half of the population of puerto rico still does not have drinking water. again, this is six days in. people have been waiting at the airport waiting, hoping to get out on a few commercial flights out and another twist, a lot of planes have been leaving with empty seats on them because the airport computers are still out. that control baggage and boarding passes. so people haven't been able to get on to the planes that are leaving the airport, even though they are stacked up in the airport trying desperately to get out. on the island people are waiting for fuel. specifically waiting for fuel to keep generators runs because that's the only power. but if -- what if those powers are the only power source in a hospital? right?
in a hospital keeping the diesel generators running quickly becomes a question of life and death. and that's happening on the ground not just in remote areas in puerto rico but capital city of san juan, which is a densely populated place. according to fema, of the 69 hospitals on the island, 58 of them lack sufficient power and fuel to keep operating. at one hospital fuel deliveries are being made by armed guards because fuel is so precious, they are worried about the risk of looting. on monday, the generator at one san juan hospital did run out of fuel. when it did, two patients in the intensive care unit died. those deaths are being attributed to the generator running out of fuel so life support stopped running. according to san juan's mayor we have seen going from house to house in waders and by boat trying to do her best to help her city survive the catastrophe.
i enthusiasm mention they are a competing news organization but hats off to cbs which had a remarkingly movable interview. >> two people died yesterday because there was no diesel in the place they were at. >> where? >> san juan. >> where? >> a hospital. >> they died in a hospital because there wasn't diesel? >> no diesel and life support system. i don't know how else to scream and shout and, you know, say it. this is the time for action. let's not talk about the debt, the freaking debt. let's talk about the deaths that will not happen if things do not get into people's hands now. >> joining us now from san juan is the mayor of that city carmen julian cruise. thank you for joining us. i know you have the world on your shoulders tonight. thank you for being here. >> thank you very much for giving me an opportunity to put a voice to thousands of people
out there that may think that we are in the brink as you mentioned, that we are in the midst of a terrifying humanitarian crisis that is taking lives and if things are difficult in san juan, the conditions are horrific outside of the metropolitan san juan area. there are s.o.s. mayday calls. i'm getting texts every day saying if anyone can read this, if anyone can hear me, cries for help. when we get to today three retirement homes and as you walked in, people would jump and shout from the windows asking for help. these are people left alone. they cannot walk. the elevator isn't working, the water isn't pumping because there is no energy. they cannot cook they have had no water since yesterday.
we transferred 20 different people from different retirement centers and ask yourself, there are boots on the ground. i see the fema people working hard in meetings and getting log logistics together but those boots need to walk and we need to start getting the supplies, food and water. something as simple as drinking water. electricity will not be here for another six months and it is true. the power grid was very weakens before that, but we have no power grid at this point. so we are running from one place to another canvassing and making sure that we find people alive before it is too late and that is not a hyperbole. it is a fact of life in san juan and the rest of puerto rico. >> you raised the alarm today what is the condition in the hospitals. there are several dozen hospitals on puerto rico and fema saying that dozens of them, most of them do not have
sufficient power or fuel to power generators. obviously, the worry with the overall humanitarian concern that could become, those could become mass casualty situations if people confined in the hospital aren't able to -- aren't able to rely on the machines and power keeping them alive. is there any sort of crisis plan about at least fueling the hospitals? >> well, i was told today by some fema employees that came to visit san juan, which i really appreciate all they are doing and we have a group of 25 logistics and firemen from new york city that mayor bill de blasio and melissa saying we got aid from chicago. mayor ron emanuel and congressman gutierrez, what is happening and i was told by one of the children's hospital that deals basically with cancer patients, small children's hospitals says that the army informed them while we were on a
way to put fuel on their tanks that they were taking over the process of putting fuel in every hospital tank. so that is really good. ourselves, we energize with four generators today and another hospital just to make sure, you know, the lines get really blurred here. the red tape has to be riffed -- ripped off as if it was a band aid. people keep asking for memos. write me a memo. for heaven's sake, write me a memo? ask me for what do you need? i'm going to tell you what we need. we need diesel. we need gas. we need running water. we need some sort of way for people to find their way around and we need our hospitals not to become death traps. so this is a big s.o.s. for anybody out there and i thank you so much, ms. maddow you're giving me the opportunity.
we need to be less occupied and become more occupied do what we need to do to get these boots on the ground, doing what they love to do and supporting the people the way they want to support the people. you can see it in their faces. their frustration as they want to move ahead and do what they have to do. but somehow that isn't happening. >> mayor cruz, let me make sure i understand where you're saying the problem is in terms of the federal response and responders that have turned up. you're saying essentially you've got good people on the ground who are trying to do this work, but the chain of command is kind of clogged, there is something happening in terms of people getting deployed and orders to get out there and do the work? >> absolutely. they are here. they want to do -- i had 80 health and human services doctors and medics h.h.s. and the next day another 80 at the coliseum and stood there for two days waiting for their marching orders. they are great people. their commanding officers were
experienced people. profession people, committed people. they are just waiting for the orders to start moving, and we need -- this isn't an issue of being poetic. or trying to paint a picture of something horrific. this is a call to action, a plea for this help that is right here to get moving and get to where it supposed to be. >> san juan mayor carmen julian cruz, i really, really appreciate the time you took to talk to us. we will do whatever we can to echo and enlarge what you are saying. please keep us apprised. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. all right. wow. more ahead here tonight, stay with us. (sigh) ( ♪ ) dad: molly! trash! ( ♪ ) whoo!
you know, we still don't know what the trump inauguration committee plans to do with the enormous slush pile of money we believe they have left over from the inauguration. we know they raised way, way, way more money than they needed for the trump inaugural. by our estimate, they raised a minimum of $50 million over and above what they actually spent. and we know that from comparing it to the obama 2009 inaugural, which also overraised. but you know what? that obama inauguration in '09 set a record, both in terms of the size and the expense of that inauguration, but also in terms of how much money they raised to pull it off. they raised $50 million. and that ended up being even more than they could spend on the biggest inaugural event in u.s. history.
but then the trump inaugural more than doubled the obama record in terms of fundraising. they raised so much more money than they needed for a much smaller inauguration. likely tens of millions of dollars extra. so what happened to the leftover money? the trump inaugural committee has said that the money would all go the charity. nothing has gone to charity. they also said the money has been audited. though no one has been able to find any record of the audit. the only thing they will admit to doing with the money so far is some redecorating at the white house and at the vice president's house, which i'm sure is very nice. in terms of what we've been able to figure out about this fund we do have one direct statement from vice president mike pence's lawyer telling us in no uncertain terms that the inaugural money is not being used to pay mike pence's russia legal fees. so we know that. as to whether or not that money is funding anybody else's russia legal fees so, far all we've got is still that no comment from the presidential inaugural
committee. we call every day to try to get a fresh new comment, but they just left was the first one. it is genuinely difficult to find out anything at all about what we believe is a giant slush fund sloshing around within arm's reach of the president with very little legal restriction on what he can spend it on. why did they raise so much extra money than they needed? why did they raise twice as much as anybody ever raised before for an inauguration? and if they were so far over what they really needed to raise, why do they appear to have still been so desperate to raise even more money that they apparently ended up offering some sketchy incentives to get further donations? we previously reported months ago on what appeared to be at least one instance of pay for play for a donor to the inaugural fund. a donor gave a lot of money to the inauguration. and then that donor have quickly got high level white house meetings. like really high level staff, including senior advisers to the president and members of the
national security council. we learned about that apparent pay for play situation. months ago but as far as we knew that seemed like a one off. now reporter sam stein at the daily beast reported it was not apparently a one-off. he has found another one. joining us sam stein, politics editor for the daily beast. it's great to see you. >> hey, rachel. great being here. >> can you walk us through what you found, please? >> okay. this was a peculiar case because it wasn't the greatest feat of investigative journalism. this guy, julio gonzalez who is the ceo of engineer tax services. it's a specialty tax firm that bill itself as the largest specialty tax firm in america boasted in a public press release put on pr web that he had hosted a white house summit on tax reform. and that white house summit featured top administration officials as well as a top economic advisers to the vice president as well as a top rnc official as well as the u.s. treasurer where they talked
about interests that are directly impacting his own business. now this was odd because he posted this himself. he was boasting about hosting this meeting. what was even odder, though, it wasn't paid for by the white house apparently. what he said was that his own family trust, his own family enterprise, a private business designed to help his own private business is the one that hosted the event. which is highly irregular. usually you don't have a family trust, a family office in this case host these events. but in this public press release, julio gonzalez said that was the case. >> and julio gonzalez was a significant donor to the inaugural fund? >> well, if you look at in the grand scheme of thing, 100-plus million raise, he was a modest donor. he gave $25,000. but that's a significant enough donation to get yourself some access. he also conspicuously has started giving to chairman kevin brady, who runs the committee that is tasked with, drum roll, please, tax reform.
so he is clearly in the game of trying to make sure that he at least has the ear of the very people who are responsible for tax reform. probably because engineer tax services has a stake in the tax reform debate. >> sam, do you have any sense from reporting out this story -- and again, i take your point that they put out a press release about it which was a good breadcrumb. do you have any sense in trying to figure out this inaugural fund and sort of taking care of donors who may have contributed to it. do you have any sense that there is a point person on that, or that there is any continuing attention to that donor's list or to this fund within the white house? >> oh, sure. we've been sifting through the list of donors. and we've seen similar cases before. and i don't want to get into them because we're reporting them out. but this doesn't make necessarily the trump administration all that unique from prior administrations. there is a long history of previous administrations taking care of the people who live them big checks. i remember back when i was with "the huffington post" reporting
on the obama white house trying to make sure that a ceo of a private college felt like he had access in the white house. that ceo had given to the inaugural committee. what makes this situation different is twofold. one is that trump ran on a pledge that his own personal wealth essentially immunized him from conflicts of interest. you didn't have to play this insider washington game because he was so wealthy. and two is absent a pr web news press release, we don't really know who is going in and out of the white house. the white house has famously or infamously declined to release their visitor logs, whereas the obama administration released those logs. those logs were somewhat difficult to follow, but at least they did it. the trump white house has not taken that step towards transparency. >> and the other difference of course is we have no idea what they're doing with the money. sam stein, politics editor for the daily beast. great to see you. thank you. we'll be right back. stay with us. over the course of 9 days...
that provide all-day comfort to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. let's get the lady of the house back on her feet. and help her feel more strength and energy in just two weeks. yaaay! the complete balanced nutrition of ensure with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. ensure. always be you.
ltry align probiotic.n your digestive system? for a non-stop, sweet treat goodness, hold on to your tiara kind of day. get 24/7 digestive support, with align. the #1 doctor recommended probiotic brand. also in kids chewables. as we wrap up tonight, i want to underscore what we heard moments ago from the mayor of san juan, puerto rico. she told us that even in san juan that has more resources and aid than anywhere else on the island, she told us nursing homes are at a point of crisis. officials finding elderly people living in nursing homes not just without electricity, but without running water and without the means to prepare any food. the mayor told us they had to transport 20 people out of different nurse homes in the last 24 hours. this is clearly a situation that is going to get worse with each passing hour, let alone each passing day. she told us tonight that as far
as she can tell, the first responders on the ground, the resources on the ground are well meaning but are very much hampered by bureaucracy. she says the chain of command is clogged. she said people keep asking her to write them a memo. >> good evening, rachel. and the mayor is really the one, from what i've been hearing from puerto rico who is really delivering the message about what's really needed. we're going hear more of what she had to say later in our