tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC October 10, 2017 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
terms of the rape allegations make the new york times story that more important. we're going to have joey kanter here tomorrow night. we'll hear more on reported out versus when it was going to be an open secret that people knew about but didn't discuss. i want to say we'll have more on that tomorrow. thanks for being with us tonight. we'll see you tomorrow. another extraordinary and moving hour of television. i want to update you on the weinstein company during your hour, issued a statement, and this is from the remaining board members, a bunch of them have quit. but there is a group left. and they said these alleged actions are antithetical to human decency. these allegations come as an utter surprise to the board. any suggestion that the board had knowledge of this conduct is false.
and boy, rachel, the reporting in "the new york times" and ronan farrow's extraordinary reporting indicate that the knowledge was very widespread in that company. >> well, and, i mean, the fact that we now have to parse what was a joke, what was a rumor, what was witnessed, what was known about, what was covered up, that level -- the level of complicity and knowledge is quite a number in terms of how close people were to the story and how breakable it was before it finally made its way into print. so this is a story that obviously is a story about harvey weinstein. but it's also a story about everybody who had contact with these allegations from when they started, and why it took this long for it all to come out. >> and there was massive cover-up system built within the company in aiding and abetting system built within the company, even bigger than the descriptions of what we roughly know about how things worked in fox news. >> and the thing that i find that makes me want to do additional reporting on this, and actually specifically makes me want to talk to the reporters
who have now broken this story, i'm looking forward tomorrow night to talking to jody kantor to hear about whether or not the times also experienced during their reporting some of what ronan described here in terms of the threats he said he got and that his sources got. these women coming forward eastbound now, the women inside the company coming forward even now getting incredible pressure and him getting incredible pressure as a reporter to not do this. that means the system for thut shutting this stuff down has been operating as recentlies that week. so if the new yorker and the times had to fight that in their own way in order to get this stuff published, that means this isn't stuff like i heard this years ago and let it slide. that means the cover-up is still active. and that's a different type of culpability in terms of people saying they had no idea. >> and the "new york times" knows how to work its way through these kinds of threats. when you're a reporter for "the times," you have massive protection system around you there is a point in this process where ronan farrow is essentially a freelancer bringing this in to the new
yorker, and he was under very serious threat. thanks to him being on your show, i got a chance to shake his hand in the hallway and talk to him a bit on the way out of the building. and there threat he was under the legal threat, the weinstein money will bury you in court threat, even if this never gets to court. just the threat of suing someone is so financially frightening in a situation like that. >> and imagine getting that threat as somebody who is bringing it to light. but then compound that by imagine being one of the women who is helping bring this to light, who is in the industry and who is talking about something that happened to them personally, who already dealt with the physical threat of what she alleges happening to her, and then imagine those legal threats on top of that, in terms of the pressure these women are under for coming forward. i don't care how famous some of these actors are who are coming forward. the amount of pressure they had to endure, the amount of stress and the bravery that i can tates for them to speak out, even now, even alongside all the other women making allegations, it's almost unfathomable. the bravery of the women to come out right now, it's really something.
>> and this is in direct service to women who are entering this business right now this year. think of the college graduates who have come out of their colleges this year who have headed off to companies similar to the weinstein company and places like that in hollywood, in new york, around here. they now have this document. and ronan's reporting is so invaluable because it puts them in the room with the person like this as they read it. and they read, they can identify what the choices that these women make in the room and some of the heroic choices roseanna arquette, for example, basically smacks down harvey weinstein and gets out of that room. there is so much for young women entering the workforce to study in ronan's article especially. >> but the roseanna arquette please is also illustrative for the opposite reason. one of the things she is coming out about is saying, listen, i
got away, and i said no, and i smacked this down as best i could. and then my career, i paid for it forever after. and yeah, i paid a major price for it. and that's part of what it cost me to stand up and do it. for me, one of the heartbreaking things about this, particularly in the follow-up story in the "times" today is to read the stories of these women who were 22, 23, 24 and entering the industry, and promising talents and wanted this. this was their dream and this is what they were pure pursuing. that's why they got in the room with harvey weinstein. not only were they attacked allegedly, the end result for them is they got out of the industry. >> yes. >> they left. they became -- they dropped that dream and did something else when they realized that this is what it took in order to get ahead in that particular part of american life and american culture. and that's on everybody whoever knew about it and tolerated.
>> i'll be watching tomorrow night as i was watching tonight, rachel. really extraordinary evening. >> appreciate it, my friend. thanks. well, for two whole days and nights, president trump mysteriously held his fire against republican senator bob corker after a twitter fight with corker on sunday morning in which senator corker got the last word on donald trump with this tweet. "it's a shame the white house has become an adult day-care center. someone obviously missed their shift this morning." and donald trump did not fire back at bob corker. someone in the white house must have been urging the president to do something he has never done. just put the phone down and walkway from a twitter fight, and he did. for two whole days and nights. possibly the most difficult days and nights of the presidency for donald trump. adult day-care center? bob corker says donald trump is in adult day care, and donald trump says nothing?
until finally this morning donald trump couldn't take it any longer. and with two days of agonizing over how to respond to adult day care, donald trump came up with this. the failing "new york times" set little bob corker up by recording his conversation, was made to sound a fool, and that's what i'm dealing with. it was an historic tweet for trump. not just because it took him two full days to come up with an attack tweet against someone who had hit him hard, but because for reasons trump scholars could not figure out today, the insult spelling of liddle has changed. liddle was simply little marco rubio, the lightweight no show senator from florida is set to be the puppet of the special interest koch brothers.
little, little with two ts, little marco is now a vote. donald trump has been able to rely on in the senate even when it comes to take away health care coverage for 20 million people. it might be that in what bob corker believes is the unstable mind of donald trump, the word little as an insult belongs to senator marco rubio. forever. trump might need it again as soon as senator rubio stands in opposition to the president on something. on anything. and to changing the ts in little to ds might make a certain sense to donald trump. but no one has yet offered a credible theory about the apostrophe. the apostrophe. liddle. but there had to be a very, very good reason for changing the spelling of that word and putting an apostrophe at the end.
because the president of the united states took 48 hours of presidential time to think about it. and there is no indication that the president was thinking about anything else during that time period. and, of course, as with most donald trump tweets, the president had no idea what he was talking about. recording senator corker's conversation with "the new york times" was senator corker's idea. and "the new york times'" idea. here is bob corker telling "the new york times" that he is having his staff record the conversation. >> i know they're recording it and i hope you are too. >> yeah, i am. >> the times released that audio after donald trump tweeted his lie about bob corker being tricked into being recorded in that conversation. donald trump did not tweet anything about what senator corker actually told "the new
york times," including we could be heading toward world war iii thanks to donald trump, and i know for a fact that every single day at the white house it's a situation of trying to contain him. and "he concerns me. he would have to concern anyone who cares about our nation." and "the president has us on the path to world war iii." donald trump apparently believes that height really is the measure of a man that is because donald trump is himself over 6 feet tall and a simple on the. "the new york times" reported today in labeling mr. corker liddle, the president was apparently returning to a theme mr. corker for secretary of state during the transition after last year's election, but was reported to have hold associates that mr. corker at 5'7" was too short to be the nation's top diplomat. well, our first secretary of state thomas jefferson was 6'2", which nicely matched the height of his boss, george washington, was also 6'2". but thomas jefferson did not
think that his height set a mandatory precedent for future secretaries of state. when jefferson's turn came to choose a secretary of state, president jefferson chose james madison, who was 5'4". three inches shorter than bob corker. and of course donald trump has no idea how tall james madison was or anything else about james madison other than he might be the guy who madison avenue is named after. which of course he is. multiple reports indicate that president trump was fuming about bob corker for days after the senator said this about secretary of state rex tillerson. >> i think secretary tillerson, secretary mattis, and chief of staff kelly are those people that help separate our country from chaos. >> senator corker said that right after rex tillerson was
reported to have referred to the president as a moron in a meeting of senior administration staff at the pentagon. the president talked about being called a moron in an interview published by forbes today. the questioner said there are reports out today over the last couple of days about you calling him a moron privately. has he talked, reached out to you than? do you believe that? do you believe that he said that? trump said, "well, we may -- we may have to if he did that, which he says he didn't, by the way. he said he didn't. and they announced with the state department that he didn't. i think it's fake news. but if he did that, i guess we'll have to compare iq tests, and i can tell you whose going to win." of course with any trumps than is five sentences long like that
one, there is bound to be at least one lie. and of course rex tillerson never said that he didn't call the president a moron. that's a very important part of this story. rex tillerson has had many opportunities to say that he did not call the president a moron. and it is true that these state department experiences said that rex tillerson did not call the president a moron. but she was not in the room when rex tillerson reportedly called the president a moron. and no one who was in that room has gone public and insisted that rex tillerson did not call the president a moron. and perhaps more importantly, no one in washington, no one in that room, no one in the trump administration has bothered to even attempt to defend the president against the accusation that he is a moron. until today. it fell to president trump himself to defend his intelligence against the accusation that he is a moron and he did that with that trumpian self-contradictory
answer that he gave to the moron question. at first the trump position is he says he didn't. by the way, he says he didn't. and then the president goes on to say, but if he did. that's how confident the president is that rex tillerson did not call him a moron. he is so confident that rex tillerson did not call him a moron that he immediately entertained the possibility that rex tillerson did call him a moron. and he entertains that possibility to the point that he come once a plan to prove that rex tillerson is wrong and that donald trump is not a moron. he says if he did that, i guess we'll have to compare iq tests. in his meeting with former secretary of state henry kissinger today in the oval office, the president did not challenge kissinger to an iq test. not just because the world knows that the 94-year-old former
harvard professor and secretary of state would beat donald trump in an iq test in his sleep, but because presidents just don't challenge people to iq contests. that's easy to forget during the trump administration. and at least one compartment of donald trump's brain seems to know that. because look at what he said with henry kissinger sitting right beside him. when he was asked about his boast that he has a higher iq than rex tillerson. >> did you undercut the secretary of state today with the iq comment? >> no, i didn't undercut anybody. i don't believe in undercutting people. >> "i don't believe in undercutting people" says the man whose true religion is undercutting people. the man who called the chairman of the senate foreign relations committee today liddle bob corker. that is what pathological lying looks like.
i don't believe in undercutting people, on the day when he publicly undercuts people. there is not a person in the world who does not know that donald trump is lying when he says "i do not believe in undercutting people." and donald trump knows that you know he's lying, but he cannot stop himself. you have never seen that before in a president. you've never seen a president who publicly proves he's telling a lie on the very same day he's telling that lie. and that is why senator corker believes this president does not have the stability or the competence. those are his words, stability or competence to fulfill the duties of the presidency. and as a result, we are on the path to world war iii. >> mr. president, is senator corker right that you're putting
the u.s. on the path to world war iii? >> we were on the wrong path before. all you have to do is take a look. if you look over the last 25 years through numerous administrations, we were on a path to a very big problem, a problem like this world has never seen. we're on the right path right now, believe me. >> "believe me." in the same interview session where the president offered the lie "i don't believe in undercutting people." when he was asked if he was putting the united states on the path to world war iii, he gave an answer that was a meaningless jumble of words without a hint of knowledge, wisdom or reassurance, ending with the two words "believe me." the only people who can believe donald trump at this point are the people who believed him when he first started lying about president obama's birth.
and according to the chairman of the senate foreign relations committee, bob corker, what's at stake now in the president's lying thanks to the president who publicly begs to be believed in one breath while telling provable lies in the next breath is nothing less than world war iii. joining us now are ron klain, former chief of staff to vice presidents joe biden and al gore and senior aide to president obama. also david frum, senior editor for "the atlantic." david frum, i want to go to you on this point of bob corker warning the world that this president is risking putting us on the path to world war iii. the president is asked about it today. and the answer contains absolutely nothing that is even relevant to the question. >> so you flipped us all out
tonight. and i'm a little flipped out. i would just point out that along with we recently mourned the loss of monty hall. along with the door number one, which behind is world war iii, there is a door number two, which presents another, according to bob corker, not quite as immediately terrifying but still troubling alternative, which is bob corker said the thing that is saving us from world war iii is that the senior officials of the trump white house, the secretary of defense, the secretary of state, the chief of staff, are not doing what the president says. they are repressing him and containing him. and that's our salvation. and obviously that's a palace coup like that is a very alternative than world war iii. but it's not constitutional. it's not the way the american system of government is supposed to work. it's not supposed to be that the president makes decisions and the secretary of state and the secretary of defense say mmm, don't think so. so we have the risk of war that you so powerfully depicted. we also have the ongoing reality of the government of the united states defying presidential
authority to cope with him and setting in motion some anti-constitutional proceedings. >> and ron klain, we have the wojtyla, conservative "wall street journal" editorial board coming out, an editorial saying of course bob corker is right. we have "the washington post" coming out with an editorial of course bob corker is right. and that leaves washington with the question of what can we possibly do if this depends simply on the mood management of the president of the united states to avoid world war iii? >> yeah, i mean, david's very scary tonight. this is the feud between bob corker and donald trump is just what every parent sees in the back seat of their minivan every day between 10-year-olds when they're fighting over who is going to day care and who is too short and who is not all the and all these things, other than the fact that one of those 10-year-old series equipped with nuclear weapons. this is not a new concern. you'll remember, lawrence, that last year during the campaign,
for the first time ever, men and women who operate nuclear silos signed a statement saying they were scared that donald trump would become the commander in chief and might order them to fire nuclear weapons. so this is a concern that we knew about during the campaign, that we're seeing bubble to the surface. and i agree with the antidote to this is a constitutional crisis where senior civilian officials, where military officials refuse to follow the president's orders. it looks like the good scenario at this point in time. >> go ahead, david. >> they're not refusing to follow. they just are saying they're developing a lot of hearing troubles. and they're trying to prevent it coming to the point where the president gives the order. and that is the thing that bob corker talked about. anthony scaramucci back in july complained about this. he said there are people inside the trump white house who see it as their job to protect the united states from donald trump. and god bless them and thank them for their service, but it is not the constitutional way to run the government of the united states.
>> let's listen what republican charlie dent said about this. >> we've had a lot of these emperor has no clothes moments. and i'm glad that senator corker has brought voice to this. we are concerned. my colleagues, my republican colleagues in the house i know and senate are concerned by much of the dysfunction and disorder and chaos at the white house. >> ron klain, there are real cracks in the wall now. there. >> are cracks, lawrence, and i think the question is will other people step up and say what bob corker said and what john mccain said when he voted against the health care bill and be republicans who speak out against this president. there are cracks, but they're only cracks. i think the question is will this come undone in time to save the rest of us from the rest of the trump presidency. and, you know, i hope that other people of good conscience will follow senator corker's lead, will follow congressman dent's lead and call this out and stand up to president trump.
and point out what's really going on here, which is a horrible crisis of our constitution and our presidency. >> david, bob corker has been very careful to not go out against donald trump until he found the spot where he felt he simply must. he actually supported donald trump at many turns in the road here. he has been reported to be very friendly with president trump prior to august, anyway of this year. so he built his credibility among republicans as someone who wasn't for their taste, in washington, anyway, just quickly or reflexively anti-trump. it took him a ways, a while to get here. but now that he is here, we have never heard more condemning language from the united states senator about the president of the united states. >> look, bob corker is no hero of conscience. but i think as the story
unfolds, there is a kind of sick, perverse dynamic which is people who really are heros of conscience, they don't matter because they speak up early. people who are less heroic, they're next. the tipping point is always the people who are the biggest opportunists. when you lose the opportunists, then you're really in trouble. what you'll have is republicans of ever worse character standing up later and later. and i think if that's what it takes to save us from the monty python alternatives of curtain number one, world war iii, curtain number two, palace intrigue and palace coups, that's what it takes. >> the line of the night, when you lose the opportunists. beautifully put. ron klain, david frum, thank you both for joining us. really appreciate it. >> thank you. coming up, the president versus the iran deal. what will the president do? when will he do it? ambassador wendy sherman will join us. she helped negotiate the iran deal that the president is now threatening. wendy sherman says the president is playing with fire.
i don't want to sound paranoid, but d'ya think our recent online sales success seems a little... strange? na. ever since we switched to fedex ground business has been great. they're affordable and fast... maybe "too affordable and fast." what if... "people" aren't buying these books online, but "they" are buying them to protect their secrets?!?! hi bill. if that is your real name. it's william actually. hmph! affordable, fast fedex ground.
you're going to see very soon. thank you, sir. >> in tweets over the weekend, the president blamed senator bob corker for the iran deal. if you listen to the trump white house, you would never know that senator corker voted against the iran deal. >> senator corker worked with nancy pelosi and the obama administration to pave the way
for that legislation and basically rolled out the red carpet for the iran deal. and those are pretty factual. >> in an op-ed in "the new york times" today, as the president moves towards decertifying the iran deal, former undersecretary of state wendy sherman, who participated in the negotiations on the iran deal said "the president and the republican-controlled congress are not only playing with fire, they are lighting it themselves." joining us now, ambassador wendy sherman, an nbc news and msnbc global affairs contributor. ambassador sherman, tell us is the essential points you're making in "the new york times" today. what is their version of playing with fire? >> well, it's very interesting, lawrence. what the president is going to do is say that he is not going to certify that iran is complying with the deal, even though the international atomic energy agency has certified eight times that they have complied completely.
and all of our partners in the negotiation, including our european partners believe that iran is complying with the deal. then he is going to toss to it congress and abdicate responsibility and say to the congress, well, now you've got under the review legislation that the president was talking about that senator corker helped design. you're going to have 60 days whether to snap back sanctions and blow up the entire nuclear deal. the president is going to say it's not in our vital national security interests, and they're not staying with the spirit of the deal. what he's really saying is that somehow or other, allowing iran to go back to seeking nuclear weapons is in our vital national security interests. and that just seems absurd on its face. in addition, quite frankly, i think the thing that he is really upset with about senator corker is the review legislation which was meant to hold an administration i think probably thinking would be a clinton administration's feet to the fire every 90 days, the
president has to say this deal is working. and the president of the united states today has said so many times it's a bad deal that having to do this every 90 days is driving him completely mad. and that's what he is really mad with bob corker about. >> the president apparently had a phone call with the united kingdom's prime minister theresa may tonight. and that is the british read-out of that phone call. the prime minister reaffirmed the uk's strong commitment to the deal alongside our european partners, saying it was vitally important for regional security. the prime minister stressed that it was important that the deal was carefully monitored and properly enforced. >> i couldn't agree with her more. i would say, you know, the president is going to talk about all the actions that iran is taking to destabilize the middle east. and there is no question that iran is really involved in behavior in the middle east. but we have lots of tools to deal with that.
we have sakes on iran for virtually every activity. the congress just passed additional sanctions against iran. we can work with our partners. we can preserve the security of israel. we can attend to the concern, legitimate concerns of the gulf countries. but we don't need to urge north korea, it's all the same, melding together we don't have to urge iran to going back to seeking nuclear weapons to do that. that's just absurd. >> quick before we go, do you have a sense if this is thrown to congress that voting might be different? for example, senators have had some time to watch this deal in action. and some senators who are posed to it in the past could be in favor of continuing it now? >> indeed. we've seen senator schumer and cardin who voted against it say the deal should stay in place. we've seen the republican chairman of the house foreign affairs committee ed royce say he thinks the deal should stay in place. jeff flake said now may not be the time to decertify this deal.
so we've got plenty of people who understand that we are doing what we're supposed to do, which is stop iran from having a nuclear weapon, which could project even more power into the region and deter us from the actions we need to take with our allies and our partners. >> ambassador wendy sherman, thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> thank you. coming up, the polls for president trump get worse and worse and worse. and now he is losing the crucial swing states that won him the electoral college. and that could all mean big wins for democrats in the elections next year. and later, the games the trump team is playing with robert mueller's investigation. this guy is upping his game by listening to an audiobook on audible. and this guy is just trying to get through the day. this guy feels like he can take on anything. this guy isn't sure he can take it anymore.
unwavering self-confidence. stuck in a 4-door sedan of sadness. upgrade your commute. ride with audible. dial star star audible on your smartphone to start listening today. take 5, guys. tired of your bladder always cutting into your day? you may have overactive bladder, or oab. that's it! we really need to get with the program and see the doctor. take charge and ask your doctor about myrbetriq (mirabegron) for oab symptoms of urgency, frequency and leakage. it's the first and only oab treatment in its class. myrbetriq may cause serious allergic reactions. if you experience swelling of the face, lips, throat or tongue, or difficulty breathing, stop taking myrbetriq and tell your doctor right away. myrbetriq may increase blood pressure. tell your doctor right away if you have trouble emptying your bladder or have a weak urine stream. myrbetriq may affect or be affected by other medications. before taking myrbetriq, tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems.
common side effects include increased blood pressure, common cold symptoms, urinary tract infection, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness and headache. okay, time to do this! don't let your bladder always take the lead. ask your doctor if myrbetriq is right for you. and visit myrbetriq.com to learn more. i'll have the langoustine lfor you, sir?i. the original call was for langoustine ravioli. a langoustine is a tiny kind of lobster. a slight shellfish allergy rules that out, plus my wife ordered the langoustine. i will have chicken tenders and tater tots. if you're a ref, you way over-explain things. it's what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance you switch to geico. sir, we don't have tater tots. it's what you do. i will have nachos!
67%. that is the astronomical disapproval rating president trump has in the latest ap poll. 67%. that's what the trump chaos presidency has earned. and that was before trump ally steve bannon promised even more chaos in the republican party. >> remember, i said i'm going after the republican establishment. and we're going to go after them. we're going to challenge -- >> give me the states there. >> is a coalition coming together that is going to challenge every republican incumbent except for ted cruz. >> there are very few political analysts who are even capable of tracking all house and senate elections, and there might be only one who is consistently good at it. the analyst we all turn to for questions of what's going to happen in congressional election
series of course charlie cook, editor and publisher of the cook political report. and now charlie cook believes that donald trump and the republicans have made democratic control of the house and senate within reach in the next election. he writes, "the party needs to subblim mate its divisions, get mainstream republicans to the polls and persuade the trump base to cast ballot for non-trump republicans. that's a tall order and it's why last week's news reduced the odds of the gop retaining its majority from a good bet to even money." joining us now is charlie cook. charlie, what about this week's news of steve bannon trying to bring chaos to the republican reelection campaigns of all the senators running for reelection except ted cruz? >> you know, this is all just so terribly self-destructive. it was as if they're trying to lose at least their majority in the house, if not the senate. and, you know, i kind of wonder, what are these people thinking? you know, how much fun would bit for president trump to hand over the power to subpoena to house democrats?
i mean, are they thinking about this? i'm just sort of baffled when i watch some of this behavior. and, you know, how in the world does steve bannon think the president's agenda would get through if republicans lose one, two, or even the three senate seats that would tip the senate over. and that's entirely possible when it's like a cannibalization going after jeff flake in arizona and dean heller in nevada, and now going after other people. wow. i'm just standing back and watching in disbelief. >> the -- have we ever seen a president come back in a year from a 67% disapproval rating? he's got less than a year, really, when you consider voting in the next congressional elections to get that disapproval rating into some kind of manageable territory for his party.
>> well, that 67 is a little hard to disprove than other polls. but just take last week's gallup poll, for example. it was 38 approve and 56 disapprove. the average for presidents, newly elected presidents at this point is 62% approve and president trump has a 38% approve. and you look at his numbers among republicans. he got 88% of the republican vote. he's got about 82% approval rating among republicans. okay, that's fine. but he got 46% of the independent vote. now his approval rating, the gallup is 31% among independents. and 9% among democrats. this is not a recipe for being able to hold on to congress. when you think of why do parties have disastrous midterm elections, and four of the last six midterm, the party in the white house lost their majorities either in the house, the senate or both.
it's a president with low approval ratings. it's a divided -- they're a party being badly divided. or it's having a congress that hasn't delivered much. well, those are the -- you know, it's check, check, check for all three of those boxes this time. so this is looking -- look, we got 13 months. but gosh, this is what it looks like when the wheels start coming off a bus. >> you published some stunning numbers in analyzing midterms since 1966, showing that if the president's approval number is under 50%, that means that his party will lose an average of 40 seats in the house and lose an average of five senate seats. if the president's approval is under 50, you didn't even publish a number, charlie, for what happens if it's under 40. >> yeah, well, this is new territory here. yeah, and now the thing is there are some factors that would partially mid gate it. congressional district boundaries since the 2011 redistricting benefit
republicans some, and natural population patterns where democratic vote is concentrated in urban areas. but let's just say take that 40 number. okay. knock it down by 25% to 30. that's still losing the house. anything 24 or over is losing majority in the house. so even with the district boundaries and population patterns, the chances of republicans losing 24 or more are going up. and but you're right. when a president has approval rating of 50 or over, they've typically either picked up seats or just lost a dozen or 15 seats. but when it's under 50, it starts getting really awful. and 38, good gosh. >> the raison. charlie cook, thank you very
you nervous? ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ people spend less time lying awake with aches and pains with advil pm than with tylenol pm. advil pm combines the number one pain reliever with the number one sleep aid. gentle, non-habit forming advil pm. for a healing night's sleep. your privacy makes you myt number 1 place to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. febreze air effects doesn't just mask, it cleans away odors. because the things you love the most can stink.
throughout my career, i've been fortunate enough to travel to many interesting places. i've always wanted to create those experiences for others. with my advisor's help along the way, it's finally my turn to be the host. when you have the right financial advisor, life can be brilliant. ameriprise tonight the associated press is reporting that president
trump is being advised to go on the attack against russia investigations special prosecutor robert mueller. the ap reports that long-time friends and allies are pushing trump to fight back, fighting concerns that his lawyers are naive to the existential threat facing the president. trump supporters and associates inside and outside the white house see the conciliatory path as risky to the maverick president's tenure. instead they want the street fighting tweeter to criticize mueller with abandon. because, you know, that always works with special prosecutors. president trump spoke to "forbes" magazine about the russia investigation in a new interview. he says the senate intelligence committee has found, quote, that there has been absolutely no collusion. they just said that yesterday, two days ago, senate there has been no collusion. it would have been really big news if that happened, right? it didn't. here is what the chair of the senate intelligence committee actually said.
>> the issue of collusion is still open, that we continue to investigate both intelligence and witnesses. and that we're not in a position where we will come to any type of temporary finding on that until we've completed the process. >> and there are some new developments in the house investigation. congressman devin nunes, the republican chair of the house intelligence committee who recused himself from the russia investigation has suddenly subpoenaed the partners of fusion gps, the firm that produced the trump russia dossier. those subpoenas were issued without consulting any of the democrats on the house intelligence committee. coming up, with the issue of collusion still open, as chairman bird just said, what could the special prosecutor's next move be? and how will donald trump and his lawyers deal with the special prosecutor? [burker] at farmers, we've seen almost everything
so we know how to cover almost anything. even a "red-hot mascot." [mascot] hey-ooo! whoop, whoop! [crowd 1] hey, you're on fire! [mascot] you bet i am! [crowd 2] dude, you're on fire! [mascot] oh, yeah! [crowd 3] no, you're on fire! look behind you. [mascot] i'm cool. i'm cool. [burke] that's one way to fire up the crowd. but we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ no, i'm scheduling time to go to the bank to get a mortgage. ugh, you're using a vacation day to go to the bank? i know, right? just go to lendingtree dot com. get up to five loan offers to compare side by side for free. wow, that's great. wait, how did you get in my kitchen? oh, i followed a raccoon in through your doggie door. [gasps] get a better mortgage on your schedule. not the bank's. lendingtree. when banks compete, you win. just think of 'em as a big cat. with rabies.
if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston, 1,200 workers are starting their day building on over a hundred years of heritage, craftsmanship and innovation. today we're bringing you america's number one shave at lower prices every day. putting money back in the pockets of millions of americans. as one of those workers, i'm proud to bring you gillette quality for less, because nobody can beat the men and women of gillette. gillette - the best a man can get. throughout history,
the one meal when we come together, break bread, share our day and connect as a family. [ bloop, clicking ] and connect, as a family. just, uh one second voice guy. [ bloop ] huh? hey? i paused it. bam, family time. so how is everyone? find your awesome with xfinity xfi and change the way you wifi. we're going in the wrong direction, and we are at risk of having a flat earth report come out of the house intelligence committee. if we have a report on the senate side with one set of findings and then a bizarro report out of the house republican side, i think that helps the russians perpetuate their narrative that this was just something that was made up. >> joining us now, barbara mcquaid, former federal prosecutor and professor of law. she is now an msnbc and nbc
contribut contributor. we just heard eric swalwell say there is a problem with the chairman suddenly issuing subpoenas without consulting the democrats. the senate intelligence committee seems to be working much more smoothly, but then, quietly, with no one taking the temperature on a daily basis is the special prosecutor, who is unaffected by all of this. >> yeah, i'm sure, robert mueller, this is his m.o. go quiet about your business, keep your head down. no media is good media, just do your work. the fact that things are quiet is just the way robert mueller likes it. i have no doubt he is keeping that team of 16 lawyers very busy around the clock chasing down every lead and getting their arms around this investigation. >> and what do you make of these reports this week? first there was a report indicating that the trump legal team has decided to go on the charm offensive with the special prosecutor, and then you have
these advisers outside of the team telling the president, no, no, no, you've got to be in an angry twitter war with the special prosecutor. it seems to me that neither one of these approaches will make any difference with real federal prosecutors. >> yeah, i think whenever you're a high-profile public figure like president trump, you have to really fight the battle on two fronts. there is the legal battle, of course, and then there's also the battle that's being fought in the court of public opinion. and you have to kind of figure out how you want to play that. but with respect to the legal battle, i agree with you. i don't think any of this is going to matter to robert mueller. he's going to get what he wants to get one way or another. if you can make witnesses available voluntarily, you can
provide requested documents voluntarily, or you can fight robert mueller and require him to use subpoenas and litigate them in court. but ultimately he will get what he wants and it will only dictate the pace of the investigation. i think it's in the interest of the american people to speed things along. if you're donald trump and you believe you've done nothing wrong and you want that exoneration, you should cooperate to get there. >> carter page said he will not testify before the senate intelligence committee. this is somebody who is available to just about every tv talk show who would invite him on, and he became a stranger and stranger witness for himself on television. do you think he might be getting legal advice that now is the time to start being quiet? >> it could be if robert mueller, for example, wants to use him as a witness, and if he wants to cut a deal with robert mueller, for example, in exchange for leniency, he would testify against others that conducted more egregious misconduct than others, he wouldn't want to blow that deal. that could be one potential reason he wouldn't want to be talking to other committees or even the media. >> barbara mcquaid, thank you
for joining us tonight. >> thank you, lawrence. tonight's last word is next. five years ago, on any given night, almost 75,000 veterans experienced homelessness. we have reduced those numbers by almost half, but despite the great progress that we have achieved, there are still too many veterans who still need a place to live. this project is a comprehensive rehabilitation of the center's facility here in downtown boston to create permanent supportive housing, transitional housing and service spaces, a facility that really delivers on society's commitment to people who have served in the military. citi® was the financial partner because they were able to come with the resources, both the capital resources and also the human resources, the experts in their fields, and without citi's partnership we probably would not be here where we are right now. the goal for us at this project is to be more effective in the services that we provide
why would you -- you'll find out? you'll find out. >> what the [ bleep ] is wrong with this guy? what is wrong? why would you -- you'll find out? you'll find out. a cliffhanger surrounded by military people, you'll find out. will trump give humanity the rose? will civilization make it to the fantasy suite? and calm before the storm, is that what he was saying, calm before the storm? how the [ bleep ]? calm before the storm? how is all this not the storm? this is all the storm. and what kind of a sociopath would use that terminology while people are still literally cleaning up from storms?
>> jon stewart gets tonight's last word. "the 11th hour with brian williams" is next. members of his own party and his administration as he goes after senator corker's height and secretary tillerson's iq. also following the president's national security meeting today on north korea and after he declared this the calm before the storm, tonight we get a rare look inside from a journalist just back from there during a time of foreboding. plus the rolling tragedy in california. the death toll is growing and 2,000 structures just gone. a live report tonight as "the 11th hour" gets underway. >> good evening once again from our nbc headquarters here in new york. day 264 of the trump administration. and tonight this